Iranian official blames Maliki and Assad for ISIS creation

Mohammad Ali SobhaniIn an unprecedented development the Iranian Foreign Ministry adviser, Mohammad Ali Sobhani, yesterday blamed the Iraqi regime of  Nouri al-Maliki, and the Syrian regime of Bashar al Assad for the creation of the islamic State of Iraq  and Syria  ( ISIS)

In an interview with a local Iranian website «telltale News» Sobhani said  the sectarian policies during the reign of former PM Maliki   led to the formation of an incubator for the«Daash» or ISIS  organization .

Sobhani said that the economic and social problems that plagued Iraq, in addition to sectarian policies practiced  by the al-Maliki  regime led to the formation of a popular base for the emergence of ISIS  in the region.

Sobhani said that ISIS  benefited from the weakness of the state’s authority and from  injustices suffered by the  Sunni people which  forced them to  support ISIS  who promised to  take «revenge».

Sobhani also  criticized  the Assad regime, saying: «The Syrian people all  across the country  initially protested  peacefully  for  legitimate demands , but the Assad regime  tried to suppress the demonstrations with excessive force which led to the emergence of armed groups later, pointing out that the Syrian regime justifies it by saying« if not for  suppressing  the demonstrations the events  could have taken  a different course », stressing that he does not agree with this view, saying that« if the Syrian government has taken steps at the beginning of the demonstrations to meet the legitimate demands of the protesters  , the situation would not be like it is  today ».

It is worth mentioning that Mohammad Ali Sobhani  is a former Iranian ambassador to Lebanon during the rule of former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami between years (1997-2005). He was appointed as an  adviser to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs following the  election of the current Iranian President Hassan Rohani in 2013.

  • zabada

    That is america who created sectarians there.America dethrone Saddam with false flag that he have wmd ,America know Syiah will massacred sunni when they favor politic to syiah,and Sunni will revolt on new Syiah government.America know Syiah and Sunni is an old enemies to one another for centuries before and their know well political and religious feud by the two.That why america is not dethrone Assad,otherwise they are intervene on isis with limited strike.Why?…American is going to prolong the war that created by them.These colonial nation will not stop bullying and dividing and killing and enslaving others.The worse,now they are at the hand of Zionist Jews bankers who are great enemies to all muslims and mankind.

    • wargame1

      Documents Revealed: ISIS Caliphate working for America and Israel.

      The former NSA and CIA agent Edward Snowden revealed that the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi was trained in Israel.

      Snowden added that the American CIA and the British Intelligence collaborated with the Israeli Mossad to create a terrorist organization that is able to attract all extremists of the world to one place, using a strategy called “the hornet’s nest”.The “Hornet’s nest’’ strategy aims to bring all the major threats to one place in order to track them, and mostly to shake the stability of the Arab countries. The NSA documents revealed that the ISIS “Calif”, Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi went trough intense military training in the Israeli intelligence “Mossad”.Besides military training, Al Baghdadi studied communication and public speaking skills in order to attract “terrorists” from all the corners of the world.

      • arzatna1

        This is known as the snowdon hoax. Time traced the hoax to Iran’s official Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA), which Time accused of “concocting an obviously fictional fake Snowden interview to bolster the narrative.”

        • wargame1

          Those Hoax news are coming to whitewash the true leak. How about this guy on this very news ? Isnt he an Iranian telling the truth? I dont need to hear the truth from the mouth of snoden or this Iranian guy. Its obvious that Iran Muri Malik Assad regime sponsor Al-Qaeda/Daesh against the sunnis.

      • zabada

        They said that to prevent muslims to join ISIS and harm Israel.The west playing many games to win.You know nothing.

        • wargame1

          Kobani is not in Israel. Get a GPS

          • zabada

            The west is not favor them (Kurdish) territories at the past.Ask the west why thy are not favor Kurdish a sate to live in,like they favored to Jews in Palestine.Hnece kurdish will fight for their sate and created instability there.It is the west wrong doing.The west condone many wrong doing.That why always chaos in middle east..the west who are mapping midlle east.Not the arabs.

          • wargame1

            The west and others work for their interest. Why do you bring this when I have been asking you again and again to post the hadis and support your claim? Show me the hadis that Al-Mahdi will come from Iraq. You are a liar and you wont be able to prove it. You know why? The hadis says Al-Mahdi will be a people of Medina. Those people who you call Wahabi. Are you ready to accept Al-Mahdi from saudi Arabia?

        • wargame1

          They Said? Who are they? ISIS isant attacking Israel , it is attacking the main syrian rebel , helping Assad and Iran. Noe ISIS went to invade the Kurdish oil field.ISIS doesnt want to attack Iran either. Bagdadi is talking about attacking Saudi Arabia in favour of Iran

        • wargame1

          You are using the same rubbish as Iran does. They all talk about attacking Israel but end up attacking the sunnis in Syria in Lebanon and let the Israeli invade more Palestinian Land. Daeshdogs are attacking Israel??? sounds convincing to me but where is Israel? Is it in Kobani? How about attacking Assad ? Did Assad go to Kobani?

          • zabada

            you not a great politicians..you know nothing.the worse you are not Syiah..nor sunni..nor wahabi..i don,t know who you are..may be you created you own mazhab…and have some followers ?.

          • wargame1

            You are an asshole. Now tell me who are the wahabi and what they follow ? Quote some from their book

          • 5thDrawer

            Barbara Lee dropped a good link in another post here, wargame ….
            http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.ca/2012/11/confessions-of-british-spy-and-british_27.html

          • Reasonableman

            Sorry to invite myself to the conversation, I just finished the first page of the link you have posted.
            call me the village idiot if you may but this agents ambition to split up the muslims has not wavered and judging from the first page his mission is ongoing.
            He talks about gaining trust so he writes about some truths and then half baked truth with some historical facts in order one trust his judgement.

            Then he goes on to talk about how wonderful islam sunnis are and how attatched he became to them whilst also claiming the shiites were close minded but correct. <—- this alone sets the stage for sectarianism and magnifying the differences and importance for sunnis and shias to close doors of reconciliation.

            Again he talks about how he would commit sodomy and to disassociate the limbs holding the islamic ummah apart if it were his countries best interest.

            So breifly has tried
            1. Magnify difference between shias and sunnis
            2.magnify difference between the races and mosques (turks syrian saudis egyption alaazhar)
            3.portrayed muslims as emotionally retarted and inept.

            I believe anything this man says is compramised and only for his benifit and beliefs for muhammed peace be upon us told us arabs are not better than white or black or non arabs we are all equal and only better in piety and we can all achieve piety by obeying allah most high.

          • guest

            Brother, The Rules of Thumb when it comes to Shits, Zionists, Islamophobes, and Hypocrites:

            – Never Believe what they Say
            – Never Trust them or their propaganda
            – Never Rely on them or their sources
            – Always believe the Opposite to be TRUE of what they Show or Say

          • guest

            The Islamophobes from any religion or with no religion are so typical and predictable !

            They won’t think twice to show n spill their hatred towards Islam and Muslims even if they have to side n befriend Shits, Zionists, etc. for that !

            No wonder they are no different or any better than them Shits, Zionists, etc. !

            Here was a classic example of that !

            Sunnis should see n realize that !

          • Reasonableman

            Its all a test of faith from allah.

            Those who do plot plot wallahi allah is the best of planners.

            Those who physically harm us wallahi allah is greater than them.
            Doesn’t matter if they are thousands or millions their is no running away from the justice of allah on yawm al qiyama where they will eat thorns which does not make them full nor nurture them.

            Our religion is about intention, advise and manners. We can advise in the best manner and should not be upset if they reject our advice. Shayton makes pride look like a priority and people will fall in error some will repent and look back and thankyou for your advice and make dua for you to enter jannah while some will keep falling like riding a slippery slide.

            barakallahu fik I enjoy reading your posts.
            Personal question why don’t you have a name? There has been occasions people copy others names so it would be much easier to identify you.

          • guest

            Appreciate it, Likewise Brother. Please watch the videos and other posts Exposing the Infallible Shits from their own books, fatwas, husseiniyats sermons, Majalis speeches, Ayatoilets, etc.!

            http://yalibnan.com/2014/11/20/saudi-arabia-urges-un-to-designate-hezbollah-as-a-terrorist-group/

            http://yalibnan.com/2014/11/15/islamic-state-sets-sights-on-saudi-arabia/

            http://yalibnan.com/2014/11/24/amid-talks-israel-weighs-action-against-iran/

            http://yalibnan.com/2014/11/26/iranian-official-blames-maliki-and-assad-for-isis-creation/

            True but not all “guest’s” would Expose the Infallible Shits with such Accuracy and Consistency. That should help in Differentiating!

            Living among them helped a great deal in Seeing, Experiencing, Knowing, Reading, and Learning the Real them! Hope the World does too!!!

          • Reasonableman

            Some kinky videos didn’t think shiits could go any lower then shit, its true you learn something everyday. Just gotta take the shit with the sweet. <—- such a shitty thing to say.

            Have a great weekend brother

          • man-o-war

            Glad to see you’ve made a new friend. Someone who thinks on your level. The level thats lower than shit. You’re friend guest hates shit, because he’s a fuck. Now we know you’re a fuck as well.

          • Guest

            You don’t seem glad you seem preetty shitty. Ill tell you what though im glad all this shiit entertains you to the point your joining in.

            As for fuck. Only with girls champ I dont swing for the other shiit team.

          • Reasonableman

            You sure your glad? Coz you seem pretty shitty. I’m glad though that all this shit entertains your shiit sense of humor and your joining in.

            As for fuck. No thanks I only do women.

            I learned another thing, full-o-shit (manowar) swings for the other team.

          • man-o-war

            First, nobody invited you for a fuck. I just simply stated that you and guest are fucks that think alike.

            keep up the classy work. Show to the world your hatred for shit. Continue demonizing a religion you don’t agree with, what’s new? We’re all going to hell fire! You and guest will be in paradise suckling NUTella from each other’s… Shits vs fucks!

          • Reasonableman

            Cry my a river. Just let it go bud. Btw nice self portrait.

          • man-o-war

            Tell your lover to let it go, he spends lots of time trying to show us how evil shits are and how oppressed his Sunnis are

          • guest

            Embarrassed Already Twelver Shit !?
            Hang in there n Enjoy the ride, lots more fun to come straight from your very own Books, Fatwas, Sermons, Husseiniyats, Majalis’s, Mouths of Ayatoilets!
            Hey can’t let it go now as Its people’s demand as they have become fond of you Shits that they want more to have a good laugh at you Shits stupidity. No one can blame them to want more as you Shits are Hilarious !

          • man-o-war

            Thanks for the comedy! now go get closer to God, please hurry!

            The fucks need your help! Fight!!

          • guest

            What you think was happening !? This is all for the love of Shit-Fucks like YOU who are in dire need of HELP !!! The World at last is taking notice to you Shits and your deceptions, treacheries, lies, religious falsehoods a.k.a stupidity / comedy, … !!! No wonder you Shits nowadays are getting n being Exposed left n right !!!
            Sucks to be a Shit, no wonder why Farq (Pro ISIS) always denies being a Shit !!!

            Btw, You are most welcome !

            Hang in there pal, lot’s more to come. Heck Ya, get yourself one laugh too at your own Shits stupidity or may be you have been laughing all along while pretending to be disgruntled, upset, angry, disturbed, psyched, frustrated, jealous, traumatized,… !!!

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            Did you say “manners” please look up the meaning. Kah kah kah kah he he

          • Reasonableman

            Gotta have a sense of humor. Otherwise you end up like manowar taking selfies eating bacon and eggs off his own ass.

          • man-o-war

            Not my ass mate, mine is much more hairy. I would stoop lower and say I was eating bacon and eggs off your wife’s ass, but who am I kidding, her ass is hairier than mine. Lol

          • Reasonableman

            Ahhh thats some scary shiit you daydream of hairy asses wouldn’t expect anything more then family insults from ‘peices’ of ‘shiit’. Lol

            Maybe you and ASSad are brothers.

          • man-o-war

            Haha, only a simple minded fuck like you gets offended when his wife’s hairy ass is brought into the convo. It’s not my fault you want her all natural. That way when you go down on her it reminds you of making out with ASSir.

            You and guest need to work on your insults. It’s like talking to a mentally challenged ape.

            Why are you living in Australia again? The caliphate needs more fluffers. You and guest are in high demand these days. Go and do your jihadi duties, instead of hiding out in a western country that you despise. After all, Australia joined the coalition and are supporting the oppression of your peeps.

          • guest

            You are right, Who can be better in Insults, Abuses, Curses, Whining, Venting, Crying, … than the ORIGINALS, the evil satanic deceptive SHITS !?

            No wonder why you Shits are so fond of Homosexuality, it runs in your filthy cult doctrines and carries great rewards upto getting Heaven !!!

            Hey, thanks for mentioning an APE….have exactly one for you Shits, please watch it and have a blast !!!

            Btw, FYI – Whole World is God’s Creation and you can live wherever you chose to. It’s people like you who makes it despiseful, despicable, evil, filthy, dirty, Un-Godly, and non-habitable !!!

            Tell that to Iran / ASS ad and Shits / Khawarij’s who are running that evil inhumane dogs of hell fire, your very own n beloved…The ISIS !!! They have been doing a great job for you Shits in bringing the whole humanity to the door step of destruction !!! Bravo Shits Bravo !!!

          • man-o-war

            oh ok, keep up your comedy. Jesus was a Muslim, right? Lol

            I disagree, it’s intolerant people like you that makes the world less peaceful and a bit more foul smelling. You fucks want to move to a western country and expect everyone to respect your freedom of expression, freedom of religion, but you fucks can’t be bothered when non-Sunnis want the same freedoms.

            Look at your fucks in the UK, France, Australia, Germany,… And the list goes on. Sharia this sharia that. Don’t drink alcohol on our street, don’t dress in a mini skirt near our mosque, and so on. I say fuck you and your fucking religion.

            You can’t live in England and expect people to give up their freedoms so you feel more comfortable. There is a perfect country for all you religious fucks, Saudia Arabia or Iran if you’re a shit. Now get back to your goat…ummm I mean wife.

          • guest

            Lol…didn’t know your WIFE was a GOAT !!!
            Why it wasn’t shocking, reason Beastality is permissible and carries great rewards upto getting Heaven in Shitism !? You Shits are stupidly hilarious. It’s like come n mock us, please !!!

            Look who’s talking, the creator of Daesh, the dogs of hellfire !? Was he not !? How can you agree, you are a Shit…remember…A GOAT Banger… !?

            FYI, I love getting back to Shit-Fucks like you and your hilarious cult. One can never get tired of Exposing you Shit-Fucks.

            Talking to you Shit-Fucks is like talking to an APE or a CHIMP atleast they are more receptive and smart than you stupid Shit-Fucks….hey btw, those CHIMP videos were for you and at your request !!! Hope you enjoyed them !!!

            Thank you for asking for more, it’s always a pleasure to HELP a Shit-Fuck !!!

          • man-o-war

            “Lol…didn’t know your WIFE was a GOAT !!!” , hahaha!!

            Mmmmm…Ass bacon

          • guest

            Me neither until you told yourself that Your Wife was A Goat, can you get any smarter you dumb stupid Shit-Fuck !?
            Actually you are a sorry sight and waste of Time. So long, Wombat Shit Goat Lover !!!

          • man-o-war

            Sorry sight and waste of time! Your life described in one sentence, lol.

          • guest

            “Sorry sight and waste of time! Your life described in one sentence, lol.”

          • Hind Abyad

            Your religion is about intention, advise and manners? I wish so..it’s a dignifying thing to say about your religion. I see no manners in the person you admire however.. he used to be manjuice, Majoos, then Guest, barabie’s faithfull shadow, now he’s YaLibnan shitt spammer in chief… makes one want to run away from religion…as far as his legs can take him.

          • guest

            Look who’s talking !? Who !? What Hypocrite !? Check yourself first before talking about others !

            If you are upset then please take it out at your Ayatullahs who said n wrote all that crap not at a peace seeking messenger who just relayed it so the world know the Real Shiism ! First tell them not to write or say Perverted Shit before taking out your anger at honest messengers as they are just mere Truth Tellers ! It makes two of us to run away from your deceptive cult of a religion !

            BTW, what you n your kind do here anyways, if not for Exposing others n their beliefs which are different than yours !? So why this biased one-sided Hypocrisy !?

            Who are you anyways to tell people what to do n what not to do !?

            So stop your self righteous BS which you like to force on others beside yourself !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            Mistaking identity, i never met an ayatullah.. this or that.. Missing some vocabulary?
            Shiiitts, Perverted Shit, BS…Oh what’s a Perverted Shitt? Does God know what your shitty talk is about.

          • guest

            You should know very well or trying to pretend that you don’t !?

            Everything was straight from your books, fatwas, sermons, husseiniyats / majalis speeches, and mouths of your own imams n Ayatullahs. TRUE REAL n ORIGINAL !!!

            If you didn’t read or watched then do it right away and all your smart questions will be answered !
            If you don’t like then please take it out with them and not with honest truth tellers !!!

          • man-o-war

            Your books and hadith are way better. Can you post more videos and sermons that I won’t watch, but someone might. Keep spreading the truth about how ignorant you are. Now your butt buddy is claiming you never said they were Muslim.

            Everyone one knows the only true Muslims are the Sunni. Anytime Sunni are portrayed in a negative light you can blame it on Israel or Shi’ite, how nice. You guys are so pure and innocent.
            Take beer! Take beer!
            Abu bakr fo life!

            Mmmmm…Ass bacon

          • Hind Abyad

            i know nothing of what you’re saying..

          • guest

            i know nothing of what you’re saying..nobody does, did, or ever would.. “Maaloom yistiflou, bas haida akbar hmar, akbar kazab maal ell saoudieh. why you and your fellow hypocrite idealogues took total control of blogs to talk among yourselves.” ufff… “ma bahref, mahomry shif nass mtloun.” “Its not only the blogs you and your fellow hypocrite idealogues , hameeer and kazabein are many better to not feed them.” “We can’t educate you and your fellow hypocrite idealogues who have hearts of stone and shit for brains. Ashbudik fiyoun, trikiyoun God made sheep and goats some have horns and some don’t. It’s wise to let you and your fellow hypocrite idealogues choose yistiflou.”

          • Hind Abyad

            Big difference, i never ever meddle in your conversations.
            I read authors like Dostoevsky..Flaubert..Truman Capote, Khalil Gibran etc…no-things to do with Moslems or Hubris, no-thing about religion fanatic Moslems sects and Settlers, both brains manufactured in close circuits, they are a society’s mosquitoes.
            As for me i only read excerpts of the Bible at catechist classes..God forbid to read the Koran, Torah.
            Stop following me you’re obsessed, you’re loosing your time with me “Hameer and kazabein” are foreign accents.Why you refused to pronounce Jesus when you were parroting me..We talk among ourselves, not argue 30 posts per page with 150 youtub sectarian grotesque videos about shitt and feces..too much is too much, you people take the whole space. it’s a Lebanese site, not a Moslem meditative religious site .

          • guest

            Big difference, i never ever meddle in your conversations.
            I read authors who propagate Peace etc…no-things to do with Shits or Hubris, no-thing about religion fanatic Shit sects and Settlers, both brains manufactured in close circuits, they are a society’s mosquitoes.
            As for me i only read excerpts of the Peaceful Books at Peace classes..God forbid to read the Tahrirolvasyleh, Al-Kafi.
            Stop loosing your time with me.
            -Say the name of Mehdi.
            Stop following me you’re obsessed, you’re loosing your time with me “Hameer and kazabein” are foreign accents.Why you refused to pronounce Mehdi when you were parroting me..We talk among ourselves, not argue 30 posts per page with 150 youtub sectarian grotesque videos about shitt and feces..too much is too much, you people take the whole space. it’s a Lebanese site, not a Shit meditative religious site .

          • Hind Abyad

            Ok. Mehdi. Say the name of Jesus, then scram away I’m busy.

          • guest

            Now admit you are Shiite.. then scram away, I’m busy. Btw, why you keep on asking when you already know and said Jesus (pbuh) is one of among many Muslim Messengers sent by God ?!!!

          • Hind Abyad

            -Hind Abyad to man-o-war 2 days ago

            The sectarian mad Salafi, flattering nagy like Lucifer flattering Jesus on Mount of Olives.
            —–
            -guest to Hind Abyad 2 days ago

            the sectarian mad Majoosi, flattering other Majoos like Lucifer flattering God on Mount of Olives.
            —-
            -Hind Abyad to guest 2 days ago

            Jesus never said he was God. you Christian haters.
            —–
            -guest to Hind Abyad 2 days ago

            Mehdi always said he was God. you Shia haters.
            —–
            -Hind Abyad to guest 2 days ago

            Who’s Mehdi..
            —–
            -guest to Hind Abyad 2 days ago

            Your God !!!
            —–
            Now scram, it’s Christmas season for me.

          • guest

            ..?

          • Hind Abyad

            ..authors who propagate Peace? You don’t even know them it’s not your culture, it’s literature, not religion.
            I said scram away.

          • guest

            ..authors who propagate Peace? You don’t even know them it’s not your culture, it’s literature, not religion.
            I said scram away.

          • Hind Abyad

            When rattlesnake doesn’t know what to say he rattles..
            Instead of playing the Salafi parrot why don’t you talk about Literature? Cause closed circuits brains don’t want to scram, they want to convert..ha ha…

          • guest

            When rattlesnake doesn’t know she rattles.. instead of playing the Khawarij Takfiri Shit Majoos parrot why don’t you talk about Shit Literature.. cause closed circuits brains don’t want to scram away, they want to convert..ha ha…

          • Hind Abyad

            Hmar and kazzab, insignificant human being..find a hobby

          • man-o-war

            I think he thinks you’re a Shi’ite. Obviously anyone who opposes him and his intolerance is a Shi’ite.

          • Hind Abyad

            i’m sad, you ruined this place nobody comes anymore you’re a disgrace.

          • guest

            i’m sad, you ruined this place nobody comes anymore you’re a disgrace.

          • Hind Abyad

            cry me a river idiot..

          • Reasonableman

            I don’t know if im missing a chapter but guest never said “they” were muslim.

            For all I know “they” are exposing all the hidden shit that even shits didn’t know that this shit is from their shit books and scholars. Guest is doing a great job presenting “facts” and evidence to remove the stinking shiits.

            You have your right to question who guest is but ill stick to believing something which is proven.

          • man-o-war

            What is proven is you’re a moron. You should leave Australia and preform jihad against the Shi’ite. How can you sit in your comfort while so many of your Sunni brothers and sisters are under attack? You will be held accountable in front of God on judgement day for being a coward.

            Mmmm…Ass bacon

          • Reasonableman

            Naww shithead coming from you thats so sweet. You always have been a retard in expressing your feelings and end up talking shit. Fuck you right back 😉

            Go hit your head on a wall you headbanging shitface and wake up in 1000years time with your twelth imam from ahlul dinosaur.

          • man-o-war

            Shit talking seems to be the only thing you fucks understand.

          • guest

            You see their Hypocrisy, when they or their kind say perverted things then no one among them says Shit but if some one who is not them tries to relay Truth straight from their revered books, fatwas, sermons, husseiniyat / majalis speeches, … they get all angry n start abusing, calling names, cursing, venting, intimidating n try to stop him from showing the Truth !
            No wonder they are enemies of Islam n Muslims disguised as well wishers…!

            TheUSequalsTheIS guest
            8 hours ago
            mohammad was a pedophile for sure, mohammad raped small girls for sure too.
            he was most likely gay too and most likely had sex wid dead ppl while he most likely was a transsexual person.

            TheUSequalsTheIS wargame1
            8 hours ago
            islam is nasty, allah is nasty, mohammad is nasty

          • man-o-war

            Haha, you’re upset about all the hate directed at your religion. Allah knows Muslims have nothing but love and peace in their heart. Unless you have no heart, because it was ripped out of your chest and eaten to prove how peaceful Muslims are.

            Islam, the religion of peace. A piece here, a piece there, pieces everywhere!

          • 5thDrawer

            Well Reasonable .. you can inject, it’s ok with me. Personally, as you know, I think most of the ‘belief’ business is weird anyway. 😉

          • zabada

            it is too many in here..you can read it…too long to write in here.I is also a political movement in Arabia..Jaziratul arab…likely to Syiah..also a political movement..covered with religion..their followers are deluding that way.They are not an expert in religion..otherwise they teaching religion..their heart eyeing on politic and worldly life.hence they deluding many of the exact teaching of Islam.That all.

          • wargame1

            You do not need to post all the hadis , Just post that hadis where Al-Mahdi will supposedly come from Iraq. Whats your problem ? Cant find anything in the hadis book you liar?

          • zabada

            if you not believe ..it is your bussiness..it is not harm me a bit…You see as a liar?.

          • wargame1

            I do not support those Daesh Khawarij Dogs of the hell fire. These animals need to be destroyed with their followers

          • zabada

            They are using same word up to you.you are not acknowledge that sunni make 80% of all muslim..most of new convert in the west,thousands of them is sunni.Sunnis brotherhood is the stronger among all believers,many of them will host isis,bring their expert in Iraq ,rebuilt infrastructure and rebuilt Iraq to a strong country.Isis will remain strong for many decades in future and Assad days is numbered.Syiah only make about 10%.Sunni now make 90% of all muslims..Syiah eventually can,t defeat them..Syiah will lose Iraq forever..how the syiits can win with this small population..Even i m sunni I m remain neutral.But i give true analysis.May be you are one Sabiha..the worse humankind in the earth.

          • wargame1

            I am talking about the Daesh Khawarij Dogs of the hell fire. The sunnis are 93% worldwide and the rest 7% are Shia , Sufi ,Khawarij, Kaadiani, Alawite, Ahamadi, Ismaeli etc. No Muslim Scholar support those daesh dogs. The main Syrian sunni resistance group boot those Khawarij dogs out when they exposed the Khawarij agenda of Daesh

          • zabada

            you ask god they are really in hell fire..?.you must place you self nearer to god on this issue..to know the exact fate..believe..prophecies..and ect…I guess you are not a very religious people..by your word..even your knowledge make some sense.

          • wargame1

            How about you ? are you having a daily communication with God? Bring one single reference from any Muslim Scholar who support these Daesh Khawarij dogs

          • zabada

            if you love him..he love ..you..that is Allah..only the god…if you ask him..he will answer you…that is in quran and hadith…otherwise you abandon him on your ways…hence he will abandon you..and left you without any guidance by him.He is higher than knowledge….you must place your knowledge after him.That is only the way to find the truth.You must learn sufism..even wahabi dosen,t like this…you must read Ibnu Arabi..Abdul kadir jailani..ibnu rumi and ect..it is difficult to find the truth..not all can see it..many great sufis and saint are suffer too much..you can,t take that suffer..even me..to achieve some state.I m not at any state.I happy i m a sayfie sunni..as isis was.

          • wargame1

            Post hadis you liar . Show me that Al-Mahdi is coming from Iraq. Which hadis says that?

          • zabada

            I must go back to library to find the book…it is not easy to find.

          • wargame1

            Yeah go back to the library

          • zabada

            i m not your not slave.

          • zabada

            see imran Hosein in you tube.

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            You can see marilyn manson on you tube also.

          • guest

            You can also see some honest Christian Scholars debunking today’s Christianity and Bible!

          • 5thDrawer

            Which makes them believable ? I mean, as Atheists? 🙂 Agnostics have a better handle on it perhaps … because no-one really knows. Right?
            Honestly, the best any can say, is that ‘males’ wrote a lot stuff about gods … and allowed females to write MUCH less. :-))

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            You can see all sorts on the tube, depends what your looking for.

          • guest

            True, the ones which interests you, especially the ones Debunking Today’s Christianity n the so called Christians !

          • wargame1

            Imrah Hossain is a mini Dajjal. Do you know his background? He is a sufi and a Iranian Bitch. All the sufis are allied with the Shia. This guy preach hadis out of context and then twist it according to his agenda. Who listen to Imran Hossain ? Most of the Shias and the sufis. When a wicked person bring news for you then verify. This is the reason you failed to post any hadis supporting your fairy tale. We are not able to see what is ahead of us in one second. So when you talk about future events then say it what ever you have found in the hadis. Be it weak no problem because those hadis were compiled by the sunni scholars in the past.

          • zabada

            you are too arrogant.what kind of muslim you are…sound like nonmuslim.

          • TheUSequalsTheIS

            those scholars were all persians… no arabs among them

          • guest

            Were they Majoosi or Sunni Muslims !?

            Btw, any luck with the 4 eyed dog, majoosi the slave of Shits !? Did your master, the Shits of Iran lifted the ban !?

          • TheUSequalsTheIS

            u r so funny 😀

          • wargame1

            Shias are less than 7%. The Sunnis are 93% world wide. The rest 7% are shia Sifi Alawite Ismaeli Khawarij and others and among these 7% minority the shias are more. So the Shias are less than 7%. Most of them live in Iran. The Muslims under the leadership of Al-Mahdi will attack Iran jointly with the Romans and defeat them

          • zabada

            no..Syiah will assimilate them selves to sunni,,even now in Iran..there are 40% sunni..who covert from Syiah..also most christian will convert to Islam when Jesus.. (isa a.s) appeared..even now many Christian convert to sunni islam in the west..Israel..america,,may be U.K will be destroyed by world coalition..Russian and many countries will sided sunni..believe or not ..it will take place in future..see propecies in Daniel..(bible)..Psalm..83…also the hadith,,authentic hadith,..All religous people in three major religion believe this.islam..Christian..Judism. Find it by yourself..don,t ask me to write.The prophet said some of Jews and Christians information..their holy books..are true.Some are false..since bible is written too long ago,at the past.It is deleted and added by many priest.Christians scholars on Bible also agree on this issue.Peace.

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            Zabada you are a very clever specimen.

          • guest

            You saying, more than you!

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            What would i know?

          • guest

            True !

          • wargame1

            You are trying to sell your snake oil but again there is no reference to the hadis. What a nonsense you write ….”Russian and many countries will sided sunni..believe or not”
            The Muslims in Syria at this time suffering from russian oppression through their Iranian and Alawite stooges. So why Russia will side with the sunnis? To attack Iran and Assad? You eat what ever that Imran Hossain shit. Where is the proof from the hadis?

            The Romans and the Muslim will make a truce and together they will attack Iran. They have attacked the soviet Union together and disintegrated them if you may recall. Russia is the main supporter of Israel. All the Ashkenazim Jew are 100% Russian origin.

          • man-o-war

            Who are the Romans?

          • wargame1

            The Romans are the descendant of Esau i.e. the twine brother of Jacob (Peace be upon him) . Esau didnt get the prophet hood but he had some great qualities in governance. They are also called Banu Al-Asfar i.e. Red/Yellow people. Esau was born with that appearance and his progeny resemble to him. So today the Romans are the Europeans. Some Romans have paternal side with a daughter of Ishmael (peace be upon him) . Her name was Basemath who was one of the wives of Easu(according to the Bible) . In the Bible they are called Edomites. Edom means Red. There are some prophesy about the Romans.

          • wargame1

            Here is how we learn about the Roman Qualities in the hadis:
            Muslim narrated from al-Mustawrid al-Qurashi that he said: “I heard the Messenger of Allah (Peace be upon him) saying: “The Hour will come when the Romans are the majority of people.”
            So ‘Amr ibn al-‘As said to him: “Watch what you say.” He said: “I say what I heard from the Messenger of Allah [sallallahu ‘alayhi wa-sallam].”
            He said: “If you say that, it is because they have four qualities: they are the most able of people to cope with tribulation, the quickest of them to recover after an affliction, the readiest of them to return to battle after fleeing, and the best of them to the poor, the orphan and the weak. And they have a fifth good quality: they are the strongest of them in resisting the oppression of kings.” (Sahih Muslim)

            NOW: You may compare with these Qualities with the European/American people. See how they govern the country and they also are tolarant to other religion and rights. They are not very religious though but they uphold the right to worship in other religion.

          • wargame1

            Persian Roman comparison
            Nu’aym ibn Hammad narrated from Ibn Muhayriz that he said: “The Messenger of Allah (Peace be upon him) said: “Persia will only take one or two thrusts, and then there will be no Persia after that. But the Romans will have many generations: whenever one generation goes, another one will take their place.”

            ——————————————————————-
            We can see this prophesy fulfilled. The great Persian Empire demised when the Arabs conquered Persia. since then if we compare them with the Romans then Persia is with no match. They are confined within their borders but successfully managed to installed some stooges i.e. Bashar Al-Qaeda in Syria, Hezbushaitan in Lebanon etc

          • wargame1

            Psalm..83 is not a prophesy but its a kind of prayer , no one knows who wrote that.

          • wargame1

            Do you know who fought with their Blood to save the Ashkenazim Jew in Germany during the second world war ? Its their brother the Russian red Army who fought the Germans in order to save their Russian Jew brothers. Why do you think Russia has a base in Syria? Its because they want to protect the “Little Russia” next to Syria.

          • zabada

            At the times,Russian are under Jews influence.

          • wargame1

            Here is a youtube video where Putin and Netaniahu side by side talking about friendship. You will see how Putin is recalling his support of their Ashkenazim Jew brothers.
            /watch?v=eB7vqHqDGU0

          • zabada

            all politician do that kid.

          • wargame1

            Ehud Barak noted “improving relations” between Russia and Israel, and thanked Russia for its fight against fascism during World War II.
            “We know the truth: the state of Israel would not exist if the Red Army had not defeated fascist Germany,” Ehud barak said

          • wargame1

            According to a statistics on 2000 “Three out of every four of the newcomers in Israel are from the former Soviet Union” Almost a sixth of the 6.1 million population in Israel are Russian speakers. watch the following youtube video on Russia and Israel sign military agreement

            /watch?v=JSMpj3zXyEI

          • wargame1

            MOSCOW, Sept 6,2010:Russia Boosts Military Ties With Israel

            “We have signed a long-term agreement on military cooperation,” said Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov after the meeting with his Israeli counterpart Ehud Barak, quoted by Russian news agencies.“We are ready to continue sharing experience with the Russian military on fighting terrorism and ensuring security, including by using air drones,” Ehud Barak said. Russia and Israel sign military agreement

          • zabada

            Nonsense news.Russian hate israel..Russian suffered too much at the times of Bolshevik revolution..there is an university in Ukhrine studied Jews History and how jews do their crime.Even now Russia sided Assad and Iran,enemies of israel.

          • wargame1

            The Sunnis dont care whether Russia hates Israel. We know that Russia Iran India Assad regime Israel are on the same side. Who support Russia ? The Shiats and the Sufi like that cracl pot Imran Hussain

          • wargame1

            Does Russia support the Syrian sunni rebel or they support the Shia stooge Bashar Al-Qaeda in Syria? Who are you trying to fool boy?

          • wargame1

            The Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) said: “Allah will never allow my Ummah to unite upon misguidance and incorrect beliefs. Allah’s mercy, blessings and protection are with the largest group of Muslims. And he who deviates from this largest group of Muslims will be thrown into Hell.” (Sunan Al Tirmizi Vol.2 Pg.39)

          • wargame1

            “Those who have caused schism (splitting or division) in their religion and they have become Shia (sects or groups), you (Prophet Mohammad) are not one of them in any way. Their case (for judgment & punishment) is up to Allah. Then, He (Allah) will tell (confront) them about what they used to do.” (Quran6:159) Allah is telling the Prophet about those who break away from Islam and a lesson for us that they would never form a sect if they like the Quran and sunnah.

          • wargame1

            Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) said:“For every Ummah there are Magians (Zoroastrians) The Magians of this Ummah (Muslim nation) are those who reject the Qadr (pre-destination). If anyone amongst them dies do not attend their funeral and if anyone amongst them becomes sick don’t visit them. They are Shia of the Dajjal and it is the right of God to join them with the Dajjal.” (AbuDawud4072) The Shia reject the concept of Qadar and instead have adopted the Mutazalite school of thought which rejects Qadr. The Khawarij in Haroriah in Iraq also adopted the Mutazalite School of thought thus they has good relations with the Abbasid Khelafa

          • wargame1

            Al-Tirmidhi (2152) narrated that: Ibn ‘Umar said: “I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace be upon him) say, ‘Among this ummah those who disbelieve in the divine decree (“al-qadr” i.e.pre-destination) will be swallowed up by the earth, transformed into monkeys and pigs or pelted with stones.” (Al-Tirmidhi 1748)

            The Khawarij , The Shias, Sufis do not believe in Al-Qadr.

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            Less than 7% and look what they are doing with you guys. You better call on the Romans asap.

          • guest

            Let’s call the Zionists, why bother already messed up Romans!

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            The zionists are already with the iranians, you missed out man.

          • guest

            You seem not updated, they are sworn enemies who dish out hot air threats against each other…Forgot !?

          • wargame1

            Why do they have to do what they are doing? Isnt it peaceful not to meddle with Syria where 80% are sunnis. I would like to see a Sunni Leader in Iran instead of those shits

          • wargame1

            Post some hadis instead of your moronic analysis. I am still waiting to hear from you as you claimed that Al-Mahdi will come from Iraq. Post that hadis if you possibly can. And if you hear if from someone then challenge him to produce the proof. Any way so who is youre Mahdi? Do you consider Abu dua Bagdadi as your Mahdi since he is from Iraq??

          • zabada

            Bagdadi he is not is not almahdi.Almahdi name.. is Muhammad ibnu Abdullah.It is in Bukhari Muslim.

          • zabada

            I bet i read alhadith long years ago…in authentic hadith..i have many books..some i borrowed its from state library…almahdi will appear in a mosque in Iraq…4000 soldiers of alfasiqin..bad muslims haunt him..almahdi ran to mecca to hiding in…ather story you can read on web,,too many hadith there..authntic and weak hadith,,even it is a weak hadith,,it is not a false,hadis,,,so is is can be true..ulemas of alhadith created very strict method in order to find very authentic hadith..hence many hadith was classified as a false hadith by them.Even so, they are not classified that weak hadith as a false hadith,Hence the hadith is remain as “can be true” even by themselves.That all.

          • wargame1

            Hey asshole post those hadis , I am not interested in your shit

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            Whats the difference between his moronic remarks and the remarks in the hadis?

          • guest

            Lol…someone seems bored, need some thrill !? What’s the difference between different versions of Bible and why the quotes different from each !? Even the one’s written by your beloved Fruits! The Christianity and Bible of today seems to be so blessed!

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            Hadthis, talmuds, moronic remarks all the same. They all preach the same hate, happy days.

          • guest

            How about the concocted perverted verses n quotes from any version of Bible !?

          • wargame1

            You would understand that provided you has brain instead of Shit

          • guest

            The Islamophobes from any religion or with no religion are so typical and predictable!
            They won’t think twice to show n spill their hatred towards Islam and Muslims even if they have to side n befriend Shits, Zionists, etc. for that!
            No wonder they are no different or any better than them Shits, Zionists, etc.!
            Here was a classic example of that!

          • man-o-war

            We get it already! You’re the best, to hell with the rest. Now go and get closer to God. Take beer! Abu Bakr fo life!

          • guest

            Ya Khomeini Ya Khamenei Ya Fatso Ya Ass ad Ya Daesh Ya Halesh Ya Abu lu lu Ya Zionists Ya Ayatoilets Ya Imams Ya Mehdisaurus / Dajjal fo life !!!

          • man-o-war

            Haha!

      • doron

        “various Iranian sources reported”..and here is where i stopped reading 🙂
        i mean, it might be true and might not be, but as long as it comes from an Iranian source it holds no credibility

        • wargame1

          Iran is trying to come out clean so they are barking against ISIS more than the others. But when you see the real attack , its Saudi Arabia who are bombing the ISIS and Iran is slowly backing off. Snowden is not from Iran

          • doron

            true but the quotes comes from an Irani source- it says so in your post.
            if Snowden himself or impartial body would say that i will believe it, not going to argue with a credible report but when a report comes from Irani source ,which many hold accountable for harboring EQ/IS leaders for long times, it’s hard to believe that it is Israel and not Iran that trained them.

          • wargame1

            I quoted the newspaer where the news stated in that way. Many other papers hosted that news. So I am going to bring other source from other country then

          • wargame1

            Google the following and you will find many newspaper around the world hosted that information
            ——————————————————
            FORMER CIA AGENT: “THE ISIS LEADER ABU BAKR AL BAGHDADI WAS TRAINED BY THE ISRAELI MOSSAD”

        • wargame1

          That news broke at Morrocan times and Global research and many other webpage. Iran has a easy way to blam Israel as it is the most effective propaganda to fool the sunnis. The Palestinian are 98% sunnis and due to Israeli atrocities the sunnis around the world are naturally angry against the Israeli government. When Hezbushaitan murdered Rafic Hariri they immidiately blamed on Israel!! so do not bother what Iran shit says

  • guest

    Strange, Master punting it (ISIS creation) on it’s Slaves – ?

    Part 1:
    Iranian Foreign Policy and Religious Doctrines: The Facts and Benefits

    Reality: Fact and Truth
    The question to ask is this: Who really benefits from the unfolding ISIS spectacle?
    – Aren’t the big winners sitting within the Assad regime and the ones supporting him!?

    Propaganda: Demonizing Sunnis
    – At first glance, this might look untenable as the ISIS is propagandized to be a Sunni extremist group which makes it ideologically averse to the Shi’ite extremist Islamic Republic. Past this, why would an Islamic Republic that already has Iraq in its tight grip want to destabilize Iraq? In order to answer that question, one must look back at the history of the Islamic Republic, especially at its foreign policy and religious doctrines.

    Iranian Foreign Policy and Religious Doctrines: The Apparent Truth
    – The nature of the Islamic Republic to have a tendency towards crisis creation and crisis management. It feeds upon crisis and exploits it to advance its agenda. The more than three decades of the history of the Islamic Republic is dotted with blatant instances of using that method to gain leverage in the international arena. The Iran Hostage Crisis in 1979, the Beirut Barracks Bombings in 1983, and the notorious nuclear program that is still going on are only a handful of those instances.

    – It’s hatred towards Sunnis and Arabs.
    – It’s dream of wielding power and hegemony all over Middle East.
    – To be the sole voice and authority in the whole region.
    – To create a platform for it’s false messiah (Mahdi/Dajjal).
    – To fulfill the Shiite prophecies as per their book of prophecies “Al Jafr”.
    – To create Shiite crescent and Persian empire.
    – To take over Saudi Arabia and the two Holy Sites.
    – To convert all Sunnis to Shiites.

    Part 2:
    ISIS an Iranian Tool: Behind it’s creation

    – The former head of the British Army said that the West should sit down and negotiate with Assad to get rid of ISIS, but what if ISIS was created by Assad and his ally Iran, which has members of the elite Republican Guard in parts of Syria?

    – As crazy as it sounds, that would explain why Nouri Al-Maliki’s Iraqi army fell away so easily in the face of ISIS leaving behind a massive arsenal of weapons for the militia to use. It is virtually inconceivable for a trained fighting force to leave all of its kit behind before doing a runner, just as it’s virtually inconceivable that a crack fighting force like ISIS could emerge from a rag tag bunch of ill-disciplined rebel fighters buoyed-up by disaffected youngsters from Europe and beyond.

    – Make no mistake, ISIS’s domination of Iraq is nothing short of breath-taking; it has achieved in a matter of weeks what the US and its allies failed to do in 10 years of occupation. This hasn’t happened by accident; military victories on this scale take strategic planning and inside help. So who, exactly, is behind ISIS?

    – ISIS is a tool being used by the Iranians and the Syrian regime, and it does not hesitate to murder, slaughter, and terrorize.

    – The strange absence of Hezbullah and other Shiite terror militant groups from the scene. As these terror groups not too long ago fought FSA and the patriotic Syrian freedom fighters to save the evil regime of Ass ad.

    Part 3:
    The Quds Force behind ISIS: Training and Equipping Them

    – The Quds Force, which is the special-ops unit of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) of Iran, under the leadership of the Qasem Soleimani, by taking advantage of the situation managed to replace the multi-national force.

    – Dozens of comprehensive reports published in the past couple of years show that Soleimani has been wielding considerable power in Iraq and been enjoying a privileged position behind the political scene in that country. As it seems, he has under his thumb both Nouri al-Maliki, the Prime Minister of Iraq, and Masoud Barzani, the President of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region. By exploiting his immense clout in Iraq, he has been tirelessly setting up numerous Shi’ite militia bands and training and equipping them, not only to enhance his influence and maintain his empire in Iraq but also to keep the road to Syria, where many pro-Islamic Republic contingents fight for the Assad regime, secure.

    – However, it is possible that Soleimani also contributed to the forming of and having a hand in controlling the ISIS, albeit via indirect means and methods. In fact, Abdul Halim Khaddam, the former vice-president of Syria, told Asharq Al-Awsat that Iran brought ISIS to Syria. No one has any doubts about that. Iran is a main part of the fighting in Syria. There are the Shi’ite organizations, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and Hezbollah, fighting alongside Assad. The fall of Assad will [be] a painful blow to the Iranian regime. If Assad’s regime falls, Iran’s presence in Iraq will be over and Hezbollah’s role in Lebanon will weaken, or shall we say, vanish.

    – As such, the only reasonable way to explain the newly-found might of the ISIS is that it was Soleimani who equipped them or at least facilitated their access to heavy arms and mechanized weapons. Coincidentally, drawing upon a report by an IRGC-affiliated website. Soleimani has been sighted in Iraq. As the report indicates, he seems to have been there before the insurgency flared up and is still there. Therefore, as things might not be what they seem to be at first glance, one will be well-advised to judge carefully or to postpone judgment until all becomes clear.

    Part 4:
    ISIS, Iran’s bargaining chip: Putting Pressure and Keeping It’s Hold on Syria

    – Now, imagine a crisis-friendly Islamic Republic that has so far gained if not everything but many things it has wanted from the international community through use of sheer force and extortion. Today this Islamic Republic is likely to need the ISIS for a number of reasons. One seems to be putting pressure on the West. It should not be taken for nothing that the hitherto dormant ISIS all of a sudden becomes active while the Islamic Republic is caught in the middle of rigorous negotiations over its nuclear program with the West. This crisis can loosen the West’s strictures on the Islamic Republic, i.e. the guardian of Iraq, as it might be thought to help contain the situation in Iraq.

    – In addition, the crisis in Iraq can instill fear in the hard-pressed Iranian people so that they won’t be willing to do anything in the way of opposing or toppling the regime. By putting the horrors of sectarian war before the people’s eyes, the regime can convince them that the Islamic Republic is their only protector in the face of this fierce Sunni insurgency. In this situation, playing on the Iranians’ sense of patriotism can bolster the regime’s position. As the Islamic Republic is mobilizing its troops in the west of Iran, the regime’s propaganda machine has already begun to capitalize on that patriotic message throughout the social media.

    Part 5:
    Using ISIS to Penetrate Saudi Arabia: The Deceptions and Propaganda

    – However, if one still finds it difficult to entertain the possibility that the Islamic Republic could be behind the ISIS, a simple lesson in geopolitics would do. It has been reported that the ISIS militias have demonstrated significant firepower and have even been using choppers, which shows that they are well-equipped. Had this happened in any southern provinces of Iraq like Anbar, which is, close to the border with Saudi Arabia, the regional power usually presumed to be behind the ISIS, the claim that Saudi Arabia is involved would have been tenable.

    – However, the area overrun by the ISIS, encompassing parts of Ninawa and Salahaddin provinces, lies to the other extreme of Iraq, far away from Saudi Arabia. In fact, it is enclosed between the road to Syria to the south – which is completely controlled by the Quds Force, cutting off the area under insurgency from Saudi Arabia, the Turkish border to the north, and the Syrian border to the west. Now, a crisis-ridden Turkey is not in a position to want to meddle with the Islamic Republic. President Rouhani’s trip to Ankara that was much coveted by an almost bankrupt government in Turkey makes that clear. On the other hand, the eastern regions of Syria are under the influence of the Kurds who are not amenable to the ISIS.

    Conclusion:
    – The Creator is the Benefactor.

    • wargame1

      You have asked the very good question as who benefits . But they wont touch that subject

      • 5thDrawer

        One thing for sure … it won’t be ‘The People’. The ones who first asked for some say in how things could work, better and with some equality, for them.

        • wargame1

          The term “wahabi” was first introduced by the French to demonize the sunnis and later the Shits of Iran used that term till to date. I want you to listen to a lecture from a Muslim Scholar of Lebanon i.e. Abdul Rahman Dimashqiah
          Here is a youtube video link explaining this wahabi thing. Please watch it
          /watch?v=96dMvaFoVE4

          • guest

            Along with the term “Wahabi”, the Shits other favorite propaganda terms to demonize Sunnis are “Salafi” and “Takfiri”.
            Whereas the Fact is they are the Real and the Original “TAKFIRIS” and “KHARIJIS”, which you would know IF you read their real history since their evil inception, instead of blindly following and believing their propaganda!

            The Rules of Thumb when it comes to Shits, Zionists, Islamophobes, and Hypocrites:

            – Never Believe what they Say
            – Never Trust them or their propaganda
            – Never Rely on them or their sources
            – Always believe the Opposite to be TRUE of what they Show or Say

          • man-o-war

            Ok, so don’t trust a shit, don’t rely on a shit, and never believe what a shit says. Does this also apply to fucks? You know, fucks like you. If I can’t trust a shit, how can I possibly trust a fuck?

          • guest

            Yes “Shit-Fucks” like you and rest of your kind! You can’t and should never!
            Thanks for enjoying the post!

          • man-o-war

            haha, did you get butthurt?

          • guest

            It’s not about hating or being upset or any filthy thing you and your kind think or assume but it’s about TRUTH which needs to be EXPOSED so the naive World know the REAL them!

            Let me tell you an open secret which I bet you already know so let’s tell the audience. If you want to know the REAL Belief’s, Practices, Deceptions, etc. of “Shit-Fucks” then JUST READ their Books, Fatwas, Sermons, ATTEND their Majlis, and SEE them in their natural habitat with just them and their kind then you will get the TRUE un-adulterated and non-Taqiyah version and not the FAKE Taqiyahful version which they dish out to World on “Shitty” regularity.

            BTW, That’s you and your “Shit-Fucks” kind occupation. Bet it hurted like “Shit” initially but am sure you got used to and Loving it NOW. Anyways what you and your “Shit-Fucks” kind have been doing is a great deed and comes with great rewards. Please for your heavens sake keep getting “Butthurt”!

            Hey did you happen to see the wonderful videos? If you liked this post bet you would love them Videos! Enjoy, more to come!
            It’s always a pleasure to Expose “Shit-Fucks” even though they are doing a great job themselves of getting Exposed left n right!
            You have to give it to them for being so boastful and filthily honest with no Taqiyah in their Books, behind the closed doors Majlis and Speeches. That’s one great advantage being among them to See, Read n Learn the Real them! It makes it “Shit” lot easier to Expose them! Thank you dear, “Shit-Fucks”!

          • Anti ISIS

            Hahahaha, you want truth, then go and see what your Sunni brothers are doing in Iraq and Syria. The only ones who have been exposed are you Sunnis. You can post a million biased video clips, it wont matter. What matters is what you animals are doing to innocent people for not following your satanic veiws. And the world is watching very closely.

          • guest

            Was wondering where the other brain dead Shit was and here we are!

            BTW, Shit-Brainless everything which was posted was right from the books, fatwas, sermons, majalis, and mouths of your very own SHITS n SHITISM – ALL REAL, TRUE N ORIGINAL!

            THAT’S WHY YOU OR OTHER SHITS DIDN’T JUMP TO DENY ANY OF THAT AS IT CAME STRAIGHT FROM YOUR OWN BOOKS, FATWAS, SERMONS, SOURCES, and MOUTHS OF YOUR VERY OWN HIGHLY REVERED SHIT-TOILETS! YOU CAN’T DENY THE TRUTH, CAN YOU !? OR WILL SAY IT’S ALL FROM SUNNI BOOKS AND SUNNI IMAMS !?
            THAT PROVES ALL WHICH YOU SHITS TRY SO HARD TO HIDE AND DENY AS NOTHING BUT EMBARRASSING N BITTER TRUTH!

            May be you never cared to learn or know your own shitty cult or just shit embarrassed to admit!

            It’s Okay, people are there who LEARNED, READ, KNOWS, LIVED, SAW, and LOVES to EXPOSE “SHITISM” and “SHITS”!

            Hang in there WOMBAT, more to come! You Shits have the habit of assuming everyone who EXPOSES your evil satanic filthy CULT to be Sunni(s)!? So Shit-Typical!

          • Anti ISIS

            You really are a moron, hello, anybody home. obviously not. I’ll spell it out for you again animal, I’M NOT A SHIITE. In saying that, i would rather be a Shiite than an jihadi pig like you and your kind. Now go an issue another fatwa relating to sex. Especially the ones that allow you boys to bang eachother whilst at war. You sick mother fuckers. Or maybe another one that allows a man to have sex with his wife within 6 hours after she dies. And you Sunnis have the nerve to call the Shiites infidels. lol. Now don’t forget to takebeer takebeer.

          • guest

            WHATTTTTT OH YOU ARE NOT A TWELVER SHIT BUT AN ALAWI SHIT!

            Wish you were a Twelver Shit and tried to refute your own books, fatwas, husseiniyats sermons, Majalis speeches, words from your own Ayatoilets mouths, etc., that would have been Hilarious!

            Oh you need more, hang in there ISIS lover and enjoy the ride as there are tons of Shit fatwas glorifying mutah, group sex, sodomy, beastality, incest, Necrophilia, Pedophilia, homosexuality, trans-sexuality, …
            The Twelevers Shits fade away when it comes to Alawi Shits and their Shitty belief’s.
            No wonder even the Twelvers Shits call you dumb fucks LA-DEEN or INFIDELS, imagine that!

            BTW, Since when Alawi-Shits stopped being called Shits !? Embarrassed n Ashamed !? What you Alawi Shits are being called nowadays !?

            Good names you got their Alawi Shit – Moron, Animal, Pig, Piglet, Boy Banger, Sick Mother Fucker, Dead Wife Banger, Infidel, Brain Dead Shit, Wombat, ISIS Lover, Dumb Fuck….sorry mate, the list seems endless but the ones above should do it ! But If you have more then please pass on so I can honor you with them! Don’t worry they all will Fit you like a T! You must be one proud Alawi Shit to have such honorable names!

            You mean Ya Ass ad, Ya Nasty, Ya Daesh, Ya Halesh, Ya Ayatoilets, Ya Dajjal !!!!

          • zabada

            I guess he is not a muslim..Such believe….It is in Hindu website..who wrote that….he is not a muslims…Many said they are muslims,but they are not by their word…..it waste our times to argue with bad mouth unbelievers.

          • Hind Abyad

            hey guests..you like shouting..

          • Hind Abyad

            You can’t understand ISIS if you don’t know Wahhabism.

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alastair-crooke/isis-wahhabism-saudi-arabia_b_5717157.html

          • wargame1

            Huffington post is not the text book where you learn wahabism. You need to identify their religious book and then quote from there. There is no such thing as wahabi. Its the Iranian shits took this concept from the French. The correct term is sunni

          • Hind Abyad

            Saudi Family history is linked to Wahhabism.. what are you saying: Ther’es no such thing as Wahabi? http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/loc/sa/saud_wahhabi.htm

          • wargame1

            If the wahabis exist then why dont you quote from their holy books? You cant bring some fairy tale. Quote from their books and then we can compare those with the Quran and hadis

          • Hind Abyad

            Don’t forget who created Saudi Arabia ..
            http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/loc/sa/wahhabi.htm

          • wargame1

            Allah created Saudi Arabia and those who rule Saudi Arabia are the Guradian of the Kaaba. They will be there as long as Allah want them to be there.

          • Hind Abyad

            http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/medina-saudis-take-a-bulldozer-to-islams-history-8228795.html Saudis bulldozed Medina.
            Allah created Saudi Arabia?? Ibn Al Saud conquered Arabia with British help not God, stop using the name of God for whatever you want, it was Treason and oil deals Standard Oil- British Petroleum- Rothschild.
            The British used Laurence to convince Sheriff Hussein in uniting the Arabs (first and last time they “united”), to oust the Turks against promesses of independence to all Arabs (including Palestinians knowing Rothschild plans for Palestine:)), when it was done, the British back stabbed Sheriff Hussein for deals and greed, they helped Al Saud conquer Arabia from the Nobel Hashemite family, the rulers of Arabia for 900 years. Ibn al Saud raped his wife and made him Watch it.. that’s the cruelty of Wahhabism, the rest was Oil deals with the Rothschild till today.

            After Iraq oil it’s Syria, Rothschild already bought oil and gas shares from Netanyahu in occupied Golan Heights, in 2009. Nothing is done for honourable causes.

          • wargame1

            Ibn Al Saud conquered Arabia and since then they are in charge of the country. So what is your problem? They didnt apply for a Job in Saudi Arabia. That was the order of the day. Was there a election back then? You need to withdraw your dirty nose in Arab matters. Its the people of Saudi Arabia who should be concerned not you stupid

          • Hind Abyad

            Don’t make me laugh..”there was no election back then” That’s a good one.
            I said it was Treason and Greed, the Hashemite family were the guardians for 900 years that’s not “nothing”, they never named Arabia after their family.. It’s like House of Jacob (Israel), Saudi Arabia is like the house of Saoud. they are the only countries named after one family. the other side of same coin.
            Yes I’m an Arab it should concern me!!
            Let the People of Saudi Arabia be concerned in their own country, but Saudis diktat goes beyond it englobes the whole Middle East, it’s from US military bases in Saudi Arabia that plains fly to destroy other Arab countries.

            We have nothing further to discuss thank you, good buy.

          • wargame1

            Dont laugh then. Saudi Arabia is like any other country in the world where there is a ruler and the people obey the ruler. So who you filthy majoos to poke your dirty nose there? Go get some muta bang from your ayatollahs and feel good

          • Hind Abyad

            Pray your Sunni God, be the same vulgar old rag as you’re now.. don’t hide.

          • wargame1

            WHO CAN BE THE GUARDIAN OF THE KAABA?
            The kaba is the house of Allah and you think any tom dick and harry will be appointed there? Allah is all knowing and all seeing. Imagine the Iranian Shits become the guardian of Kaba and then crawling towards the grave of the prophet. Now you need to understand the wisdom of Allah. Take an example of Abu Talib the uncle of the prophet. Abu Talib was the leader of the Idol worshipers. Didnt Allah appointed him to be the guardian of the prophet? Abu Talib never accepted Islam but he took care of the prophet in the best possible manner. Now the Al-Saud family can be not religious but when it comes to govern the country they do it well. When it comes to arrange the yarly Hajj pilgrimage then they do it in a best possible manner. We dont want any filthy grave worshipers in Saudi Arabia to make the place dirty

          • Hind Abyad

            That was not the question, trying to have a rational discussion with fanatic Salafists (i don’t know what you are), it’s like trying to discuss with that other side of the same coin, Zionist Settlers.

          • wargame1

            Let the people of Saudi Arabia solve there problem if they have any. There are millions of people around the world go to Saudi Arabia for Hajj and they have no complain. Now you have some problem you grave worshiper. You know why ? You want those hajj pilgrimage crawl like cockroaches but I am sorry its not going to happen there. If you like to low crawl like a cockroach then start your journey towards Karbala.

          • guest

            SHIISM EXPOSED: SISTANI

            By the time you finished watching this documentary, you will have known the reality of the SHIA.

            http://www.alburhan.com/docs/sistani/
            (I am not sure if the link is working like in the past)

            But here is a brief summary of what it’s about:

            The Safavid Shiite Iran (aka Rafidha: rejectionists of the great companions Abubakar and Umar radhiyallahu anhumaa) has set a plan called the 50s in which the strategic spreading of Shiism in the Sunni world has been defined as:

            1. Overcome and destroy the Sunni dominion

            2. Attack the Sunni Scholars

            3. Ayatullah Ali Sistani is the highest Shiite cleric who succeeded AlKhoei who died in the year 1413H. Sistani is an Iranian, who does not speak Arabic at all, and lives in Najaf/Iraq.

            4. He is the highest Iraqi Shiite authority who issued Fatwa for the Sadr army to massacre the Iraqi Sunnis, mutilate them, rape their women and displace them from their homes by force.

            5. He is the religious authority who endorsed the Shiite books which defile and satirize Abubakar, Umar, Uthman, Aisha and Hafsa ( radhiyallahu anhum ).

            6. He is the religious authority who gave Fatwa, on his website, NOT to give the poor Sunni of the due charity ( Zakaat ).

            7. He is the religious authority who gave Fatwa that a Shii can’t pray behind a Sunni in Sunni Masajid.

            8. He is the religious authority who gave Fatwa on his website that whoever does not believe in the Imamate ( the Twelf Imam ) is a disbeliever who will dwell in hellfire (Jahannam) forever .

            9. He is the religious authority who gave Fatwa that smoking only three cigarettes are allowed for the fasting smoker who can’t withstand it.

            10. He is the religious authority who gave Fatwa that it’s must to drink the sand from the graveyard of Imam Hussein (radhiyallahu anhu) provided it’s diluted with little water.

            11. He is the religious authority, on his website, who gave Fatwa that a prayer performed in the Masjid of Imam Ali ( Radhiyallahu anhu ) is better than a prayer performed in the Masjid of Rasuulullah ( salallahu alaihi wasallam ).

            12. He is the religious authority who gave Fatwa of many issues with perversion and lewdness as did his ex-leader Khomeini.

            Now some other Shiite clerics opposed his views and teachings such as Assayid Kadem Shariati Madari who died in the year 1406H in house arrest after he opposed the guardian of the jurist principle, Sabah Al Musawi also declared his opposition to the black-turbaned Mullahs in Iran, Sheikh Muhammad Taher AlKhadhani was arrested who died after seven years in house arrest for his advocacy for the equal opportunity between the Arabs and Persians in Iran.

            Muhammad Al-Sherazi was put in house arrest, his children killed and many of his followers were arrested due to his demand for the council of Jurists instead of guardian of the jurist which Khomeini invented to come to power. Sh. Hussein Ali Muntaderi who was deputy leader of the Khomeini revolution, was put in house arrest for more than ten years and anyone who contacted or supported him was arrested.

            Assayid Muhammad Hussein Kadhimini Boujardi is still in prison by just rejecting the Iranian revolutionary Mullahs’ use of religious tricks to maintain power.

            What’s the whole story about the Guardian of the Jurist. The Shiites believe that no leadership can be established before the hidden Imam ( a fairy tale which says he hid himself in a hole underground in which even a rat can’t hide ) and it’s only he who can lead the Shiites when he comes back!

            Now Khomeini was hungry for power, what should be done?. He cunningly invented the term “guardian of the jurist” which means guardian of the position of the Imam until he comes back.

            Then all those other Shiite clerics who opposed his insidious plan were either removed from power and put in house arrest, prisoned and tortured or killed.

            Khomeini had a plan to wage devastating war of eight years with Iraq in which Sunni Muslims would be exterminated.

            The purpose of the black-turbaned Shiism is NOT love and support for Imam Ali ( radhiyallahu anhu ), it’s rather a return to the Safavid Persian Zoroastrian Dynasty. It was Ameerul Mu’meneen Umar Ibnul Khattab ( radhiyallahu anhu) who liberated them from the religion of Zoroastrianism, worshiping the fire, which the Shiites still boast and remember as Nowruz (the Persian New Year’s Day.

            Zoroastrianism’s, the seventh feast of obligation, devoted to fire, the seventh creation), that’s the reason why they hate beloved Umar radhiyallahu anhu. We were once, despite being Zoroastrian, powerful nation ( Persian empire ) rivaling the Roman empire, how come Umar radhiyallahu anhu came and turned us to Islam.

            However the Iranian Safavid Shiites invented a trick of their own to overlap their hate for the companion (ridhwanullahi alaihim) with other historical myth in order to prepare the Shiite public emotion.

            These are the basic principles upon which today’s shiism is based.

          • wargame1

            The video link does not work. Possibly the Shits deleted the video

          • guest

            Yes, they have been removing, censoring, blocking,… the links which stored their hate-filled perverted evil books, fatwas, sermons, hussieniyaats speeches, videos, … as their REAL doctrines, beliefs,… were getting EXPOSED and bringing them EMBARRASSMENT !!!

          • guest

            Truth about khomeini EXPOSED BY HIS OWN SHIA COMPANION

            http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TYe30nD5WDc

          • guest

            Ayatollat Khomeini’s funeral

            http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tmMxH1yerXo

          • guest

            Shia Ayatollah: Ayatollah Khomeini is Better Than Prophets of God

            http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SX-jduurOFw

          • wargame1

            This Khomenie is a possible product of British Indian Shikh bang. His mother is a Indian shikh servant banged by a British Guy named William Richard Williamson. Khomeini was well known to have been influenced by Sikh culture and the Sikh religion. I wonder How Did The Sikh Flag Ensignia End Up On The Iranian Flag ?
            The following video is in Farsi about the secret of Khomenie the British agent.
            /watch?v=Llz-JzAgctY

          • zabada

            if he says that..he can turned him self as infidel.

          • guest
          • wargame1

            This Shit also own the biggest condom industry in Iran and in the same breath he encourage the people to have more baby

          • zabada

            Political religion…easy to cheating and deluding people in the name of Religion..

          • guest

            There are tons of Talmudic type evil perverted hate-filled Shit Hadith’s, fatwas, …straight from their own very Books if you sort by Newest and scroll down this page !!!

          • guest

            Here are some Quotes from Shits very own Books with page #s –

            001. Neither we accept such Lord nor do we accept the Prophet of such Lord whose Caliph is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#2, Pg#278 – Published Iran]

            002. None of the Prophets (a.s) had been bestowed with the Prophet Hood until He declared His belief in the fallacy character of ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#265 – Published Iran]

            003. Disclaimer to the doctrines that fate, benediction and vice belong to ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#293 – Published Iran]

            004. The fourteen innocents (Ma’sumeen) are incomparable and unprecedented like ALLAH. (Na’uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#2 – Published Lahore]

            005. There is no difference between ALLAH and Ali (r.a) such as in the virtues for; The master of Khatim-e-Suleman, The Master of Doomsday, The master of Siraat (The Bridge over Hell) and Renaissance Field, The Creator of leaves on the trees, The one who ripens the fruits, The one who continued fountains, The one who made drift in the canals (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

            006. To call ALLAH Omnipresent and Omniscient is against faith (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

            007. Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his descendants are omnipresent and omniscient, and it is only theirs quality, not of ALLAH’s (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

            008. ALLAH when talks about blessings, does so in Persian and when talks about persecution does so in Arabic (Na’uzubillah). [Tareekh-e-Islam, Pg#163 – Published Lahore]

            009. Shiite confession of faith “LA ILAHA IL-ALLAH-U MUHAMMAD-UR RASOOL-ULLAH ALI-UN WALI-ULLAH WASI-U RASOOL-ULLAH WA KHALIFA-TU BILA FASL” (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#10 – Published Lahore]

            010. Wherever Quran referred the word “RABB”, it meant as Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#66 – Published Lahore]

            011. Original Quran will not come into view till the manifestation of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#2, Pg#360 – Published Iran]

            012. Collectors of Quran eliminated virtues of Prophet’s progeny from Surah Al-Ahzab which was about to the length of Surah Al-Bakrah (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#66 – Published Iran]

            013. Usman (r.a) made alteration in Surah Al-Rehman by eliminating words “MINKUM” (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#525 – Published Iran]

            014. Quran has been purposely altered by the drunkard Caliphs {Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a)}; The present Quran is false; It’s the duty of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) to bring it in its original form; When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12thImam) will come, then the Quran will be recited in its original form (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#12, Pg#384 – Published India]

            015. “ILAA AJALIN-MUSAMMA” has been removed from the Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Muta’h Aur Salahuddin A’ybi, Pg#60 – Published Karachi]

            016. Quranic verses were not arranged by Abu-Bakr (r.a) in the same order as that in which it was revealed {hence Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran and present day Quran is incorrect} (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#134 – Published Karachi]

            017. After the death of Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) original Quran was in the possession of Ali (r.a) which he brought before Abu-Bakr (r.a) but He refused to prevail such version that is why Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#138 – Published Karachi]

            018. To provide reasoning to “WATI-FIL-DUBR” changes were made in the Quranic comprehension (Na’uzubillah). [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#415 – Published Iran]

            019. The present (false) Quran doesn’t mentions the name of “Pakistan” however ours (SHIAs) true Quran even have the name of “Pakistan” (Na’uzubillah). [Hazar Tumhari Das Hamari, Pg#554 – Published Karachi]

            020. Shiites scholars believe that Ali (r.a) and all his innocent patriarchs are superior to all Prophets (a.s) except Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#70 – Published Iran]

            021. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will come out of his cave he will be naked like a newborn and the first person who shall take the oath of allegiance on his hands will be the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 – Published Iran]

            022. The greatest slander upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) of sexual intercourse… (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#119 – Published Iran]

            023. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) used to perform Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#118 – Published Iran]

            024. On the night of consummation of marriage of Ali (r.a) and Fatima (r.a), Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) instructed them not to start their work (sexual intercourse) until He arrives their (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#251 – Published Multan]

            025. Ali (r.a) and other Ahlul Bayt (r.a) are equal in the rank with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and are superior to all other Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]

            026. After ALLAH and Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) only Holy Descendants (r.a) reached the height of saintliness, rest all other Prophets (a.s) and Angels (a.s) lie below their ranks (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#29 – Published Lahore]

            027. Jibrael (Gabriel) used to talk with Fatima (r.a) {after the death of Muhammad (s.a.w.w)} (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#198 – Published Multan]

            028. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his Holy Descendants (r.a) are not the offspring of Adam (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]

            029. Adam (a.s)’s prayers were accepted on the mediation of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), Ali (r.a), Fatima (r.a), Hasan (r.a) and Hussain (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#92 – Published Lahore]

            030. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) had some purpose to acquiesce Usman (r.a) with Himself otherwise that man was of no use to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#129 – Published Karachi]

            031. Adam (a.s) became Infidel due to His jealousy(Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#428 – Published Iran]

            032. Ali (r.a) possesses same rights as were kept by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#380 – Published Iran]

            033. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) taught Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) to Abu-Zar Ghaffari (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#92 – Published Karachi]

            034. The rank of Imams (12 Imams) is higher than every Prophet (a.s) and every Angel (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Hakumat-e-Islamiah, Pg#52 – Published Iran]

            035. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s house was like that of dirge player’s house (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]

            036. What was the compulsion on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) that He used to do intercourse with Ayesha (r.a) during her menses? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]

            037. What the lady “Zulekhah”, Ayesha (r.a) had got that Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) despite having coeval wives or other young ladies, married with a nine years old little mother at His age of fifty (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#64 – Published Lahore]

            038. Slander to Ali (r.a) to declare rape as a dogmatic matrimonial (Na’uzubillah). [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#5, Pg#467 – Published Iran]

            039. One who does not consider Ali (r.a) as the first Caliph (successor) is an apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#3, Pg#264 – Published Iran]

            040. To marry Umm-e-Kulsoom (r.a) with Umar (r.a) was a subterfuge on the part of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#1, Pg#81-82 – Published Iran]

            041. Penis proclaimed the Imamate (patriarchate) of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Aasar-e-Haidery, Pg#557 – Published Lahore]

            042. When the last era will come, Ali (r.a) will appear(Na’uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#603 – Published Lahore]

            043. Ali (r.a) is Dabat-ul-Arz (a cattle who will arise from earth before the Doomsday) (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#602 – Published Lahore]

            044. Ayesha (r.a) was an American Lady or any European Madam? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#64 – Published Lahore]

            045. Hafsa (r.a), a bad natured woman, was accepted by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)… She was a pig-faced woman (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#124 – Published Lahore]

            046. Ali (r.a) is Dabat-ul-Arz (a four-legged animal) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#336 – Published Iran]

            047. When Imam Mehdi will appear, he will first dig out Ayesha (r.a) from Her grave and will reprehend her (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 – Published Iran]

            048. Curse upon Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) who gave poison to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#700 – Published Iran]

            049. Ayesha (r.a) and Shiites Imam performed Muta’h (a form of temporary marriage regarded as illegitimate in Islam) (Na’uzubillah). [Jawaz-e-Muta’h, Pg#78 – Published Bhakkar]

            050. Jealousy, hatred and resentment were the attributes of Ayesha (r.a)’s nature (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#40]

            051. Ayesha (r.a) use to misbehave, oppose, talk louder, babble and slander on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#70]

            052. The youth of this misfortune {Ayesha (r.a)} would have spoil the old age of Mua’zzamah (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#88]

            053. Ayesha (r.a) used to babble and fight with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#53]

            054. On not arriving of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), Ayesha (r.a) suffered with the fits of madness and passion (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#54]

            055. After the death when Angels of grave start questioning then Maula’s {Ali (r.a)} chair is being brought and sins are pardoned only after recognizing him (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

            056. Sheikheen (r.a) {Abu-Bakr (r.a) & Umar (r.a)}, Hafsa (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a) gave poison to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#28, Pg#894 – Published India]

            057. Ayesha (r.a) for the first time initiated the war customs (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#275 – Published Karachi]

            058. Ayesha (r.a) was a malicious and short-tempered woman (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#289 – Published Karachi]

            059. Abu-Moosa Asha’ri (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a) had become apostate by narrating forged Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#475 – Published Karachi]

            060. Ayesha (r.a) used to say that kill the Na’sal {Usman (r.a)} because he has become a Infidel (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#Preface – Published Karachi]

            061. Ayesha (r.a)’s heart was blacked-out (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#30 – Published Karachi]

            062. Ayesha (r.a) had such an opposition with Usman (r.a) that she ordered for his murder (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#31 – Published Karachi]

            063. Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) played a cunning game like fox upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#69 – Published Lahore]

            064. O Sunnis! Is Ayesha (r.a) a woman or a female monkey? (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#67 – Published Lahore]

            065. Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will resurrect Sheikheen (r.a) {Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a)} and punish them by hanging on the tree (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#361 – Published Iran]

            066. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will appear, before other nonbelievers, he will kill Ahl-e-Sunnah and Ahl-e-Sunnah scholars (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#527 – Published Iran]

            067. Imams used to say Salam to each other while taking bath (Na’uzubillah). [Hulya-tul-Muttaqeen, Pg#118 – Published Iran]

            068. Imams are not born through the womb of their mothers but they are born from the sides of their mothers (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#474 – Published Lahore]

            069. Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) recited Holy Quran and called Salam in the womb of his mother (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#475 – Published Lahore]

            070. Imams are also innocent like the Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#28 – Published Lahore]

            071. Abdullah Ibn-e-Saba was the first who declared the faith in Imamat and that Ali (r.a) is the true God (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#2, Pg#234 – Published Iran]

            072. We (Imams) among ALLAH’s creatures are His eyes and among His servants (human being) the people of command (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#260 – Published Iran]

            073. In the early Islamic period due to Taqiyyah (subterfuge), Shiites scholars used to hide the Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#92 – Published Iran]

            074. To weep on the vulnerability of Imams and to hide the secrets is like Holy crusade (Jihad) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#283 – Published Iran]

            075. World cannot exist without Imam (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#233 – Published Iran]

            076. Imams know all what happened earlier and what is about to happen and nothing remains hidden to them (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#10 – Published Iran]

            077. Without knowing the Imam, God cannot be proved (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#331 – Published Iran]

            078. Imam knows the time of his death and dies by his own will (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#23 – Published Iran]

            079. Imam has greater qualities than the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#299-300 – Published Iran]

            080. Imams are equal in the status with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#287 – Published Iran]

            081. Imam get revelations (WAHI by ALLAH) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#329-330 – Published Iran]

            082. In the state of Taqiyyah (subterfuge) whatever Imam says just obey him and act accordingly (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#72 – Published Iran]

            083. The Angels reveal upon Imams in the Shab-e-Qadr (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#569 – Published Lahore]

            084. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will appear there will be only forty perfect believers (Mo’min) in the world (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#571 – Published Lahore]

            085. All Angels, Jibrail (a.s) {Gabriel (a.s)} and Mikail (a.s) will take the oath of allegiance upon Imam Mehdi’s (SHIAs 12th Imam) hand (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#594 – Published Lahore]

            086. After Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s death all his disciples except four became apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#1, Pg#81 – Published Iran]

            087. Umar (r.a) told to Satan that he had invaded the Caliphate of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#1, Pg#82 – Published Iran]

            088. Ali (r.a) imprecated Talha (r.a) and Zubair (r.a) to ruin in life and thereafter (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#189 – Published Iran]

            089. The first three Caliphs (r.a) and other Sahabah (r.a) became apostate due to the denial of Ali (r.a)’s prophecy (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#184 – Published Iran]

            090. Mua’wiyah (r.a) can be associated with whole vice (Na’uzubillah). [Ay As As, Pg#35 – Published Karachi]

            091. Sahabah (r.a) brought disgrace upon Islam in Uhad War (Na’uzubillah). [Ay As As, Pg#21 – Published Karachi]

            092. Ja’far Sadiq (r.t.a) never stood up from the prayer mat unless he had not sent curse upon Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a), Mua’wiyah (r.a), Ayesha (r.a), Hafsa (r.a), Hind (r.a) and Umm-ul-Hakm (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [A’yn-ul-Hayat, Pg#599 – Published Iran]

            093. After the death of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), except three all the Sahabah (r.a) have become apostate (Na’uzubillah). [A’yn-ul-Hayat, Pg#3 – Published Iran]

            094. The first after Satan who had accepted his religion is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#18 – Published Lahore]

            095. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was of the same belief which was founded by Satan (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#22 – Published Lahore]

            096. We have only La’nat (curse) and Tabbarah (imprecation) for Abu-Hurairah (r.a) like narrators (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]

            097. Mua’wiyah (r.a) was a disgraced character (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#65 – Published Lahore]

            098. Mua’wiyah (r.a) and Abu-Hurairah (r.a) were infidels and apostates (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#79 – Published Lahore]

            099. Sahabah (r.a)’s testimonial cannot save them from imprecation (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#32 – Published Lahore]

            100. Sahabah (r.a) were not blessed according to the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#68 – Published Karachi]

            101. Some Sahabah (r.a) performed evil deeds; they did the acts of stealing, rape and telling a lie (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#64 – Published Karachi]

            102. Ayesha (r.a) use to compare Usman (r.a) with a Jew named Na’sal and say that he should be killed (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#584 – Published Lahore]

            103. The caliphate of first three caliphs is like the penis of donkey (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#72 – Published Lahore]

            104. Sahabah (r.a) made innovations in the religion after Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), cut Islam into pieces and minced the Shari’ah (Islamic Jurisprudence) (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]

            105. Sodomy was very common among various Sahabah (r.a); for e.g. Waleed bin Mugha’irah, Umar (r.a)… (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]

            106. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a) will enter into hell through a special door (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#500 – Published Iran]

            107. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a) and Mua’wiyah will be persecuted severely than other hellish people (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#503 – Published Iran]

            108. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a), Mua’wiyah (r.a), Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) are the worst creatures (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#519 – Published Iran]

            109. Abbas (r.a) and Aqeel (r.a) were weak believers and men of mean spirit (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#618 – Published Iran]

            110. There is no difference in the faith of Abu-Bakar and in the faith of Satan (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#93 – Published Lahore]

            111. Abu-Hurairah (r.a) was the greatest liar who associated false Hadiths to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#442 – Published Lahore]

            112. Mua’wiyah (r.a) was apostate, the greatest non believer and a corrupt man (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#306 – Published Lahore]

            113. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was a puppet in the hands of Umar (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#92 – Published Lahore]

            114. Mua’wiyah (r.a) is being burnt inside a coffin beneath the interior most part of the hell and if Pharaoh (Firo’un) would have not said “INNA RABBI-KUM-UL-A’LA” there would be no one below Mua’wiyah (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#316 – Published Lahore]

            115. Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s mother and granny were prostitutes (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#301 – Published Lahore]

            116. Usman (r.a) protested against Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and disobeyed him (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#30, Pg#934 – Published India]

            117. Quran does not show the superiority of Abu-Bakr (r.a) but the infidelity of Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Manazarah Hussainiyah, Pg#47 – Published Lahore]

            118. Zubair bin Al-Awam (r.a) is the breed of Muta’h (temporary marriage illegitimate according to Islam) (Na’uzubillah). [Muta’h Aur Salahuddin A’ybi, Pg#24 – Published Karachi]

            119. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a cunning person (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#339 – Published Karachi]

            120. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) made naked himself… (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#148 – Published Karachi]

            121. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a liar and a miser (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#147 – Published Karachi]

            122. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a)’s mother was a big liar. [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#146 – Published Karachi]

            123. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a cheater. [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#245 – Published Karachi]

            124. Abu-Moosa Asha’ri and Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) were hypocrites and traitors (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#474 – Published Karachi]

            125. The history of the first three Caliphs was full of ignorance, stupidity, brutality, bribery and sinfulness (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#252 – Published Karachi]

            126. How unfortunate are these Talha (r.a), Zubair (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a)! (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#63 – Published Karachi]

            127. Mua’wiyah used to feign and wile (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#421 – Published Karachi]

            128. The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) himself passed the orders of Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s murder (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#108 – Published Karachi]

            129. Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s all army men were foul-natured, bastards, wile and non-believers (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#473 – Published Karachi]

            130. Mugha’irah bin Shaiba (r.a) himself and his father were hypocrites and imps (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#775 – Published Karachi]

            131. Mugha’irah bin Shaiba (r.a) was very unfortunate in faith and Islam and he left this world in the same state (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#258 – Published Karachi]

            132. Rural-ship of a villager is better than the piety of Sahabah (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#432 – Published Karachi]

            133. Talha (r.a) and Zubair (r.a) were seditious, vicious and dissentious persons who could commit any crime for wealth and power (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#443 – Published Karachi]

            134. Among a few extremely remorseful and shameful characters of the world, one is of Zubair (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#48 – Published Karachi]

            135. Usman (r.a) reaped whatever he sew (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#108 – Published Karachi]

            136. Usman (r.a)’s mother was a prostitute (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#18 – Published Karachi]

            137. I dare say that today’s Iranic Nation is far better than the people of Hijaz (Sahabah) in Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s era (Na’uzubillah). [Sahifah-e-Inqalab {Khomeini’s last will and testament}, Pg#46]

            138. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was habitual of using foul-mouth and giving abuses (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#148 – Published Karachi]

            139. Abu-Bakr (r.a) used to abuse very often (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#21 – Published Karachi]

            140. Abu-Bakr (r.a) had no religious status (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#8 – Published Karachi]

            141. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was like Halaku and Changez (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#10 – Published Karachi]

            142. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was only curious about the money in his Caliphate (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#142 – Published Karachi]

            143. Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a) were culpable and unforgiving (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#159 – Published Karachi]

            144. Mua’wiyah (r.a) killed Ayesha (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#32 – Published Karachi]

            145. Umar (r.a) not even liked Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and His daughter (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#94 – Published Karachi]

            146. Starting from the day first, Umar (r.a) is responsible for the hostilities and blood-shedding among the Muslims (Na’uzubillah). [Waqi’a Qirtas Aur Kirdar-e-Umar, Pg#63 – Published Karachi]

            147. Umar (r.a) passed humiliating sentences upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s sayings (Na’uzubillah). [Waqi’a Qirtas Aur Kirdar-e-Umar, Pg#67 – Published Karachi]

            148. Abbas (r.a)’s false allegations upon Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Wohi Mujrim Wohi Munsif, Pg#75]

            149. Umar (r.a) was sent to Hell on 9th Rab’i-ul-Awwal (Na’uzubillah). [Zaad-ul-Mua’d, Pg#404 – Published Iran]

            150. Curse upon Ayesha (r.a) and Umar (r.a); Mua’wiyah (r.a) was sent to Hell on 22nd Rajab so this day must be celebrated (with Koondas) (Na’uzubillah). [Zaad-ul-Mua’d, Pg#34 – Published Iran]

            151. Last diet of Umar (r.a)’s was Vine (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#241 – Published Lahore]

            152. Umar (r.a) belonged to such family in which mothers and sisters are made as wives (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#306 – Published Lahore]

            153. Umar (r.a) is the lock of Hell, it was better if he would be the gate (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#430 – Published Lahore]

            154. Umar (r.a) and Waleed Bin Mugha’irah (r.a) were she-gay (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#246 – Published Lahore]

            155. Nikkah is valid without the witnesses. [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#5, Pg#387 – Published Iran]

            156. Quran can be recited in toilet (Na’uzubillah). [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#6, Pg#502 – Published Iran]

            157. By hiding the private parts with only hand, Sattr can be achieved. [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#6, Pg#501 – Published Iran]

            158. What so ever the Ahl-e-Sunnah scholar tells about some query, to do its opposite is SHIA religion. [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#3, Pg#55 – Published Iran]

            159. According to SHIA scholars, Ahl-e-Sunnah are worse and dirtiest infidels than the Jews or Christians or Majoos (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#2, Pg#306 – Published Iran]

            160. Taqiyyah (concealing the facts) is the true religion. [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#332 – Published Iran]

            161. Taqiyyah (concealing the facts) is the part of belief. [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#328 – Published Iran]

            162. By not reciting “ALI-UN-WALI-ULLAH”, Ahl-e-Sunnah are not Mo’min (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#13 – Published Lahore]

            163. ALLAH produces 70 Angels from the couple who perform Muta’h which keep on praying for them (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

            164. Ahl-e-Sunnah (Nasibi) are worse than dog in front of ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#516 – Published Iran]

            165. Black dress is the dress of people of Hell (Na’uzubillah). [Hulya-tul-Muttaqeen, Pg#8 – Published Iran]

            166. Leavings of Ahl-e-Sunnah’s are as Haram then any other Non-Muslim. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#8 – Published Iran]

            167. Niece and Aunts can remain in Nikkah at a time. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#260 – Published Iran]

            168. Donkey’s flesh is Halal. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#213 – Published Iran]

            169. Black dress is the dress of Firo’un. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#163 – Published Iran]

            170. No witness is required in the Nikkah as GOD Himself is. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#251 – Published Iran]

            171. Present Azaan is correct, curse be upon Mafoodha who innovated “ALI-UN-WALI-ULLAH” in Azaan. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#188 – Published Iran]

            172. There is no right for Ahl-e-Sunnah in Islam so Nikkah with them is also Haram. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#3 ,Pg#258 – Published Iran]

            173. Istinja (washing of private parts) with Saliva is legitimate. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#41 – Published Iran]

            174. Announcement of SHIA Kalimah; reciting “LA-ILAHA-ILL-ALLAHU-MUHAMMAD-UR-RASOOL-ULLAH” is not the sign of Iman. [Shia Mazhab Haq Hai, Pg#3 – Published Lahore]

            175. Neither Fasting is spoiled nor Bath (Ghusl) is subjected by doing un-natural things with a women. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#460 – Published Iran]

            176. Own female servant can be given to someone temporarily for Muta’h practices. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#244 – Published Iran]

            177. Muta’h can also be done with Non-Muslims. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#256 – Published Iran]

            178. A man can even take benefit (by doing Muta’h) from a woman for about an hour or so. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#266 – Published Iran]

            179. Muta’h (illegitimate temporary marriage) has no accountability; it can be done with 1000 even. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#258-259 – Published Iran]

            180. Imams use to order openly for Muta’h. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#253 – Published Iran]

            181. Ahl-e-Sunnah are infidels (Kafir) so Nikkah with them is illegitimate. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#302 – Published Iran]

            182. Ahl-e-Sunnah are infidels (Kafir) so Nikkah with them is illegitimate and their slaughtered animals are also Haram. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#303 – Published Iran]

            183. Muta’h (illegitimate temporary marriage) is legitimate even for the sake of a piece of wood. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#267 – Published Iran]

            184. MEHRAM male and female can see each other’s body. [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#292 – Published Lahore]

          • guest

            Hateful Shia Beliefs from their Books – Video

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvtP-BlXS2Y

          • wargame1

            The wickedness of the Shits at its best

          • guest

            Here are some more Quotes from Shits very own Books with page #s –

            Shiites scholars believe that Ali (r.a) and all his innocent patriarchs are superior to all Prophets (a.s) except Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#70 – Published Iran]

            When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will come out of his cave he will be naked like a newborn and the first person who shall take the oath of allegiance on his hands will be the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 – Published Iran]

            The greatest slander upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) of sexual intercourse… (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#119 – Published Iran]

            Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) used to perform Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#118 – Published Iran]

            On the night of consummation of marriage of Ali (r.a) and Fatima (r.a), Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) instructed them not to start their work (sexual intercourse) until He arrives their (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#251 – Published Multan]

            Ali (r.a) and other Ahlul Bayt (r.a) are equal in the rank with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and are superior to all other Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]

            After ALLAH and Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) only Holy Descendants (r.a) reached the height of saintliness, rest all other Prophets (a.s) and Angels (a.s) lie below their ranks (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#29 – Published Lahore]

            Jibrael (Gabriel) used to talk with Fatima (r.a) {after the death of Muhammad (s.a.w.w)} (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#198 – Published Multan]

            Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his Holy Descendants (r.a) are not the offspring of Adam (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]

            Adam (a.s)’s prayers were accepted on the mediation of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), Ali (r.a), Fatima (r.a), Hasan (r.a) and Hussain (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#92 – Published Lahore]

            Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) had some purpose to acquiesce Usman (r.a) with Himself otherwise that man was of no use to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#129 – Published Karachi]

            Adam (a.s) became Infidel due to His jealousy (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#428 – Published Iran]

            Ali (r.a) possesses same rights as were kept by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#380 – Published Iran]

            Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) taught Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) to Abu-Zar Ghaffari (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#92 – Published Karachi]

            The rank of Imams (12 Imams) is higher than every Prophet (a.s) and every Angel (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Hakumat-e-Islamiah, Pg#52 – Published Iran]

            Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s house was like that of dirge player’s house (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]

            What was the compulsion on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) that He used to do intercourse with Ayesha (r.a) during her menses? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]

            What the lady “Zulekhah”, Ayesha (r.a) had got that Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) despite having coeval wives or other young ladies, married with a nine years old little mother at His age of fifty (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#64 – Published Lahore]

            After Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s death all his disciples except four became apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#1, Pg#81 – Published Iran]

            Umar (r.a) told to Satan that he had invaded the Caliphate of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#1, Pg#82 – Published Iran]

            Ali (r.a) imprecated Talha (r.a) and Zubair (r.a) to ruin in life and thereafter (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#189 – Published Iran]

            The first three Caliphs (r.a) and other Sahabah (r.a) became apostate due to the denial of Ali (r.a)’s prophecy (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#184 – Published Iran]

            Mua’wiyah (r.a) can be associated with whole vice (Na’uzubillah). [Ay As As, Pg#35 – Published Karachi]

            Sahabah (r.a) brought disgrace upon Islam in Uhad War (Na’uzubillah). [Ay As As, Pg#21 – Published Karachi]

            Ja’far Sadiq (r.t.a) never stood up from the prayer mat unless he had not sent curse upon Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a), Mua’wiyah (r.a), Ayesha (r.a), Hafsa (r.a), Hind (r.a) and Umm-ul-Hakm (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [A’yn-ul-Hayat, Pg#599 – Published Iran]

            After the death of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), except three all the Sahabah (r.a) have become apostate (Na’uzubillah). [A’yn-ul-Hayat, Pg#3 – Published Iran]

            The first after Satan who had accepted his religion is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#18 – Published Lahore]

            Abu-Bakr (r.a) was of the same belief which was founded by Satan (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#22 – Published Lahore]

            We have only La’nat (curse) and Tabbarah (imprecation) for Abu-Hurairah (r.a) like narrators (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]

            Mua’wiyah (r.a) was a disgraced character (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#65 – Published Lahore]

            Mua’wiyah (r.a) and Abu-Hurairah (r.a) were infidels and apostates (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#79 – Published Lahore]

            Sahabah (r.a)’s testimonial cannot save them from imprecation (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#32 – Published Lahore]

            Sahabah (r.a) were not blessed according to the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#68 – Published Karachi]

            Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will resurrect Sheikheen (r.a) {Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a)} and punish them by hanging on the tree (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#361 – Published Iran]

            When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will appear, before other nonbelievers, he will kill Ahl-e-Sunnah and Ahl-e-Sunnah scholars (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#527 – Published Iran]

            Imams used to say Salam to each other while taking bath (Na’uzubillah). [Hulya-tul-Muttaqeen, Pg#118 – Published Iran]

            Imams are not born through the womb of their mothers but they are born from the sides of their mothers (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#474 – Published Lahore]

            Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) recited Holy Quran and called Salam in the womb of his mother (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#475 – Published Lahore]

            Imams are also innocent like the Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#28 – Published Lahore]

            Abdullah Ibn-e-Saba was the first who declared the faith in Imamat and that Ali (r.a) is the true God (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#2, Pg#234 – Published Iran]

            We (Imams) among ALLAH’s creatures are His eyes and among His servants (human being) the people of command (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#260 – Published Iran]

            In the early Islamic period due to Taqiyyah (subterfuge), Shiites scholars used to hide the Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#92 – Published Iran]

            To weep on the vulnerability of Imams and to hide the secrets is like Holy crusade (Jihad) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#283 – Published Iran]

            World cannot exist without Imam (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#233 – Published Iran]

            Imams know all what happened earlier and what is about to happen and nothing remains hidden to them (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#10 – Published Iran]

            Without knowing the Imam, God cannot be proved (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#331 – Published Iran]

            Imam knows the time of his death and dies by his own will (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#23 – Published Iran]

            Imam has greater qualities than the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#299-300 – Published Iran]

            Slander to Ali (r.a) to declare rape as a dogmatic matrimonial (Na’uzubillah). [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#5, Pg#467 – Published Iran]

            One who does not consider Ali (r.a) as the first Caliph (successor) is an apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#3, Pg#264 – Published Iran]

            To marry Umm-e-Kulsoom (r.a) with Umar (r.a) was a subterfuge on the part of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#1, Pg#81-82 – Published Iran]

            Penis proclaimed the Imamate (patriarchate) of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Aasar-e-Haidery, Pg#557 – Published Lahore]

            When the last era will come, Ali (r.a) will appear (Na’uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#603 – Published Lahore]

            Ali (r.a) is Dabat-ul-Arz (a cattle who will arise from earth before the Doomsday) (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#602 – Published Lahore]

            Ayesha (r.a) was an American Lady or any European Madam? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#64 – Published Lahore]

            Hafsa (r.a), a bad natured woman, was accepted by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)… She was a pig-faced woman (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#124 – Published Lahore]

            Ali (r.a) is Dabat-ul-Arz (a four-legged animal) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#336 – Published Iran]

            When Imam Mehdi will appear, he will first dig out Ayesha (r.a) from Her grave and will reprehend her (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 – Published Iran]

            Curse upon Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) who gave poison to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#700 – Published Iran]

            Ayesha (r.a) and Shiites Imam performed Muta’h (a form of temporary marriage regarded as illegitimate in Islam) (Na’uzubillah). [Jawaz-e-Muta’h, Pg#78 – Published Bhakkar]

            Jealousy, hatred and resentment were the attributes of Ayesha (r.a)’s nature (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#40]

            Ayesha (r.a) use to misbehave, oppose, talk louder, babble and slander on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#70]

            The youth of this misfortune {Ayesha (r.a)} would have spoil the old age of Mua’zzamah (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#88]

            Original Quran will not come into view till the manifestation of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#2, Pg#360 – Published Iran]

            Collectors of Quran eliminated virtues of Prophet’s progeny from Surah Al-Ahzab which was about to the length of Surah Al-Bakrah (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#66 – Published Iran]

            Usman (r.a) made alteration in Surah Al-Rehman by eliminating words “MINKUM” (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#525 – Published Iran]

            Quran has been purposely altered by the drunkard Caliphs {Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a)}; The present Quran is false; It’s the duty of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) to bring it in its original form; When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12thImam) will come, then the Quran will be recited in its original form (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#12, Pg#384 – Published India]

          • guest

            Here are some more Quotes from Shits very own Books with page #s –

            “ILAA AJALIN-MUSAMMA” has been removed from the Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Muta’h Aur Salahuddin A’ybi, Pg#60 – Published Karachi]

            Quranic verses were not arranged by Abu-Bakr (r.a) in the same order as that in which it was revealed {hence Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran and present day Quran is incorrect} (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#134 – Published Karachi]

            After the death of Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) original Quran was in the possession of Ali (r.a) which he brought before Abu-Bakr (r.a) but He refused to prevail such version that is why Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#138 – Published Karachi]

            To provide reasoning to “WATI-FIL-DUBR” changes were made in the Quranic comprehension (Na’uzubillah). [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#415 – Published Iran]

            The present (false) Quran doesn’t mentions the name of “Pakistan” however ours (SHIAs) true Quran even have the name of “Pakistan” (Na’uzubillah). [Hazar Tumhari Das Hamari, Pg#554 – Published Karachi]

            Neither we accept such Lord nor do we accept the Prophet of such Lord whose Caliph is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#2, Pg#278 – Published Iran]

            None of the Prophets (a.s) had been bestowed with the Prophet Hood until He declared His belief in the fallacy character of ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#265 – Published Iran]

            Disclaimer to the doctrines that fate, benediction and vice belong to ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#293 – Published Iran]

            The fourteen innocents (Ma’sumeen) are incomparable and unprecedented like ALLAH. (Na’uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#2 – Published Lahore]

            There is no difference between ALLAH and Ali (r.a) such as in the virtues for; The master of Khatim-e-Suleman, The Master of Doomsday, The master of Siraat (The Bridge over Hell) and Renaissance Field, The Creator of leaves on the trees, The one who ripens the fruits, The one who continued fountains, The one who made drift in the canals (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

            To call ALLAH Omnipresent and Omniscient is against faith (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

            Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his descendants are omnipresent and omniscient, and it is only theirs quality, not of ALLAH’s (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

            ALLAH when talks about blessings, does so in Persian and when talks about persecution does so in Arabic (Na’uzubillah). [Tareekh-e-Islam, Pg#163 – Published Lahore]

            Shiite confession of faith “LA ILAHA IL-ALLAH-U MUHAMMAD-UR RASOOL-ULLAH ALI-UN WALI-ULLAH WASI-U RASOOL-ULLAH WA KHALIFA-TU BILA FASL” (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#10 – Published Lahore]

            Wherever Quran referred the word “RABB”, it meant as Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#66 – Published Lahore]

            The present (false) Quran doesn’t mentions the name of “Pakistan” however ours (SHIAs) true Quran even have the name of “Pakistan” (Na’uzubillah). [Hazar Tumhari Das Hamari, Pg#554 – Published Karachi]

            After the death of Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) original Quran was in the possession of Ali (r.a) which he brought before Abu-Bakr (r.a) but He refused to prevail such version that is why Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#138 – Published Karachi]

            Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) used to perform Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#118 – Published Iran]

            On the night of consummation of marriage of Ali (r.a) and Fatima (r.a), Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) instructed them not to start their work (sexual intercourse) until He arrives their (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#251 – Published Multan]

            Ali (r.a) and other Ahlul Bayt (r.a) are equal in the rank with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and are superior to all other Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]

            Jibrael (Gabriel) used to talk with Fatima (r.a) {after the death of Muhammad (s.a.w.w)} (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#198 – Published Multan]

            Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his Holy Descendants (r.a) are not the offspring of Adam (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]

            Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) had some purpose to acquiesce Usman (r.a) with Himself otherwise that man was of no use to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#129 – Published Karachi]

            Adam (a.s) became Infidel due to His jealousy (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#428 – Published Iran]

            Ali (r.a) possesses same rights as were kept by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#380 – Published Iran]

            Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) taught Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) to Abu-Zar Ghaffari (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#92 – Published Karachi]

            The rank of Imams (12 Imams) is higher than every Prophet (a.s) and every Angel (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Hakumat-e-Islamiah, Pg#52 – Published Iran]

            Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s house was like that of dirge player’s house (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]

            What was the compulsion on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) that He used to do intercourse with Ayesha (r.a) during her menses? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]

            Slander to Ali (r.a) to declare rape as a dogmatic matrimonial (Na’uzubillah). [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#5, Pg#467 – Published Iran]

            One who does not consider Ali (r.a) as the first Caliph (successor) is an apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#3, Pg#264 – Published Iran]

            To marry Umm-e-Kulsoom (r.a) with Umar (r.a) was a subterfuge on the part of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#1, Pg#81-82 – Published Iran]

            Kashf ul Gama Page #149
            Almost the same is recorded in Alaam alwari page#159 through Kashf Al Asrar page # 26

            Ibn Babawaih al-Qummi reports in his book: “Manlaa Yahdurhul-Faqeeh” (For Him Who Has No Access to A Scholar), vol.4, page 418, narration # 5914, the following:

            Reported Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Sa’eed al-Kufi saying: Narrated to us Ali b. al-Hasan b. Fidaal, from his father from Abul-Hasan Ali b. Musa al-Ridha [as] saying:

            There are nine signs for the Imam:

            1- He’s the most knowledgeable of all men.
            2- And the wisest of all (men).
            3- And the most righteous of all (men).
            4- And the most forbearing of all (men).
            5- And the most courageous of all (men).
            6- And the most generous of all (men).
            7- And the most worshipper of all (men).
            8- Is born circumcised.
            9- And purified.
            10- He sees what is behind him just as he sees what is in front of him.
            11- He has no shadow.
            12- When he falls off his mother’s womb, he falls off on his palms, raising his voice with the two testimonies.
            13- He does not get wet-dreams.
            14- His eyes may sleep but never his heart.
            15- He receives revelations
            16- The armament of the Messenger [saw] fits him perfectly.
            17- No urin or shit of his can be seen, because Allah entrusted the earth to swollow what comes out of him.
            18- His shit is far better smelling than the fragnance of musk
            etc

            The Grand Ayat, Akhond Mulla Zainul-Abideen al-Galbaigani, in his book: Anwaar al-Wilayah, page 440 writes:

            فليس في بول المعصومين ودمائهم وأبوالهم وغائطهم استخباث و قذارة يوجب الاجتناب في الصلاة ونحوها كما هو معنى النجاسة ، ولا نتن في بولهم وغائطهم بـل هـــمــا كالمــسك الأذفـــــــر ، بــــــــــل مــــن شـــــرب بولهم وغائطهم ودمهم يـــــحـرم الله عليه الـــنــار واســتــوجــب دخول الجنّة

            “There’s nothing in the urin of the infallibles: their blood, urins and shit any filth or dirtiness that may cause them to watch off from for the Prayer or the like in the sense of “filth” (Najasah), nor there is any stink in their urin or shit, rather both are like the Musk. Nay, (in fact) whoever drinks and eat their urin, shit and blood, Allah forbids fire on him, and cause him to enter paradise”

            As usual, the filth of Shi’a has no end. In the past we’ve shown examples of what they have attributed to their Imams and scholars, and in this post, their filth is extended to tell lies on the Messenger [saw]:

            محمد بن يحيى، عن محمد بن الحسين، عن محمد بن قبيصة، عن عبدالله النيسابوري، عن هارون بن مسلم، عن أبي موسى، عن أبي العلاء الشامي، عن سفيان الثوري، عن أبي زياد، عن الحسن بن علي عليهما السلام قال: قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله: أطعموا حبالاكم اللبان فإن الصبي إذا غذي في بطن امه باللبان اشتد قلبه وزيد في عقله، فإن يك ذكرا كان شجاعا وإن ولدت انثى عظمت عجيزتها فتحظى بذلك عند زوجها

            (Narrated) Muhammad b. Yahya, from Muhammad b. al-Husain, from Muhammad b. Qubaisah, from Abdullah al-Nisapori, from Haron b. Muslim, from Abu Musa, from Abul-‘Alaa’ al-Shami, from Sufian al-Thawri, from Abu Ziad, from al-Hasan b. Ali [as]: The Messenger [saw] said:

            Feed your pregnant women the gum, for the infant if fed while in his mother’s womb with gum, his heart will be stronger and his intelligence increases. Should

            the (infant) be a boy, he will be brave, and if it was a girl, she will have a big buttocks and subsequently be favord by her husband.

            al-Kafi fil-Furoo3, al-Kulainy, vol.6 Book of Aqeeqah, ch. What is prefered to feed the Pregnant and Nufasaa’, narration 6.

            عدة من أصحابنا، عن سهل بن زياد، عن محمد بن علي، عن محمد بن سنان، عن الرضا عليه السلام قال: أطعموا حبالاكم ذكر اللبان فإن يك في بطنها غلام خرج ذكي القلب عالما شجاعا وإن تك جارية حسن خلقها وعظمت عجيزتها وحظيت عند زوجها

            Several of our fellows (reported) from Sahl b. Ziyad, from Muhammad b. Ali, from Muhammad b. Sinan, from al-Ridha [as]: Feed your pregnant women gum, for if what she has in her womb a boy, he shall have a sound heart, a scholar, and a brave (man). And if what she has is a girl, she shall become well mannered, and her buttocks will be great, and will have a preference with her husband.

            Ibid, narration # 7.

            Imam Ali Ummi? (unlettered)

            According to shia claims that Hz. Ali[ra] was brought up in prophetic household and had privilege of being tutored by Nabi Allah in the knowledge of Deen and Quran, Shia go on to claim that Hz. Ali[ra] was the first person to write Quran as revealed to Nabi Allah[saw] , which was supposedly rejected by the first Khalif Syedna Hz. Abu Bakr[ra]
            But eminent shia scholar Al Muzaffar in his book claims that none of the Imams could read or write.

            Shaykh al-Muzaffar explains the Shí’a position:
            It is clear from the histories of their lives that, like the Prophet, the Imams were not trained or taught by anyone at all, not even in reading and writing, from their childhoods to the maturing of their minds. No author or teacher was seen to instruct one of them, but they were incomparable masters of knowledge.

            Al-Muzaffar, M.R., The Faith of Shí’a Islam, p. 33

            Observation: How was Imam Ali able to write Quran after the death of RasoolAllah[saw] when he was “Ummi”?

            Shia Father can Squeeze Their daughters from Behind

            Allah

            1.) He has the Quality of ‘Badaa’.
            2.) This means he forgets.
            3.) He makes mistakes.
            4.) He plans but this does not take effect.
            5.) He does not know who to appoint as the next message conveyor, the next Imaam.
            6.) “We (shias) do not worship such a god who gives authority to r a s c a l s like Yazid, Mu’awiyyah and Uthmaan.”
            7.) They say “Ali says…..I am the first and I am the last. I am the manifest and I am the hidden and I am the heir of earth.”
            8.) Shias say that the Imaams are the face of Allaah,
            9.) The eyes of Allaah among his creation.
            10.) The tongue of Allaah among his creation.

            References :
            (1.) Usul Kafi- Babul bad’aa – Al- Kafi Vol- 1 -P283 India Ed. ( 2.) Ibid (3.) Ibid .(4.) Ibid. (5.) Ibid. (6.) Kashful Asraar – 107 – Khomeni.. (7.) Rijaal Kashsi . 138. India Print. (8.) Usul- e-Kaafi -83. (9.) Ibid. 10.) Ibid.

            New Kalimah (testimony of faith)

            1.) Laa ilaaha illaahu Muhammadur Rasulullaah -Alli waliyullah, Khomeni Hujjatulillaah
            2.) Laa Illaaha Muhammdur – Rasulullah, Ali waliyullah wazi Rasulullah was Khalifauhu bila Faslein”
            3.) – Shia ‘Islaam’ based on 5 pillars – Salaat, Zakaat, Fasting, Hajj, Wilaayat.
            4.) – Azaan is “Ash Hadu Anna – alian Waliullah Wasu Rasulullah was Khalifatu hu bila faslrin”

            References:
            (1.) Wahdat Islaami – June 84 P1- monthly Iranian Goverment. Periodical. (2.) Ali Waliullah – Abdul Kareem Mushtaq. (3.) Usul- Kafi. 4.) Listen in Arafaat.

            Imaamology

            1.) They believe in 12 Imaams after Rasulullaah .
            2.) First being Ali .
            3.) Last being the 12th Imaam
            4.) Who is in a Cave ‘Surra – Man- Raa’.
            5.) Imaams they believe are Masoom- innocent.
            6.) They can make Halaal- Haraam and Haraam – Halaal .
            7.) They can change Deen- Sharia.
            8.) They are born of their mothers thighs.
            9.) They have the knowledge of the Unseen.
            10.) They say Imaams are higher in status than the Ambiyaa including our Nabi.
            11.) No concession regarding Wilaayah- (absolute necessary belief).
            12.) If one does not accept Imaams then one is a Kaafir.

            References:
            (1.) Usul -e – Kafi. (2.) Usul -e – Kafi. (3.) Usul -e – Kafi. (4.) Usul -e – Kafi. (5.) Usul -e – Kafi Vol 1 P225 / Kafi – Kitaabul Hujjuah. (6.) Usul -e – Kafi Vol 1 P225. (7.) Ibid. (8.) Ibid /Haqqul Yaqeen P126.(9.) Usul -e – Kafi Vol 1 P225. (10.) Ibid / Al Hukumatul – Islaamiyaa – 52 Khomeni. Hayaatul Qutoob Vol 3, P10 /Ibid Vol 2. P787. Footnote. (11.) Usul -e- Kafi Vol 2. P278. (12.) Usul -e- Kafi Vol 1. P225.

            The 12th Imaam

            1.) When he comes he will bring the original Quraan.
            2.) He is in hiding, in a cave.
            3.) He is alive observing the world, in totallity.
            4.) When he comes, he will be naked. Rasulullaah will swear Allegiance to him. (Allaah protect us).
            5.) He will first dig the grave of Abu Bakr and Umar ,then hang them on a stake – for all sins of mankind.
            6.) He will remove the body of Ayesha and implement the same punished for Zina.
            7.) He will then kill the Sunni Scholars.
            8.) Punish the Muslim Ummuah.
            9.) First kill Ahle – Sunnah, then Ulama, then Kuffar.

            References:
            (1.) Usul-e- Kafi. (2.) Islaamic Goverment P42/ Usul -e- Kafi P340. (3.) Hukumatal Islaamia -P52. (4.) Haqqul Yaqeen 2/227- 2/347. (5.) Haqqul Yaqeen P 361/2. (6.) Also Vol 2 P 611/ Haqqul Yaqeen – P 347/ Mullah Baqir Majlisi. (7.) Furoo Kafi – Kitaabul Raudah – P 527 also Tafseer Majmanul Bayan/ Hayaatul Qulub Vol2 P 611. (8.) Hayaatul Qulub Vol2 P 611.( 9.) Haqqul Yaqeen- Vol 2. P 527 ASlo Maj Manul Bayaan.

          • guest

            Khomeini’s book of Perversions “Tahrirolvasyleh” –

            TahrirolVasyleh, fourth edition, Qom, Iran, 1990.

            Khomeini wrote extensively on Islamic Jurisprudence. A two-volume book, which was published originally in Arabic, was called ‘Tahrir al Wasilah’. Translated into Farsi, the book is called “Tahrirolvasyleh.” khomeini also had another treatise on Islamic rules for living, called in English, “The Little Green Book.”

            In his book TAHRIR AL-WASEELA, Khomeini about whom many in the Muslim world were once deceived as a hero, teaches lewdness and perversion. This is the man, Shias until today consider as their spiritual founder, renovator of the deen ( In fact he was an innovator ) and take their deen from him.

            This book was written whilst Khomeini was in Turkey. The book in Persian, TAHRIROLVASYLEH, comes in two volumes.

            It is useful to understand what a so called esteemed Islamic leader such as the Ayatollah teaches his followers. Here are some excerpts from “Tahrirolvasyleh” which Shias probably don’t want you to know about:

            A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable. If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl will not count as one of his four permanent wives and the man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister… It is better for a girl to marry at such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house, rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven. [“Tahrirolvasyleh”, fourth edition, Qom, Iran, 1990]

            A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, but selling the meat to a neighbouring village is reasonable.

            If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrement become impure and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed as quickly as possible and burned.If a man sodomises the son, brother, or father of his wife after their marriage, the marriage remains valid.

            During sexual intercourse, if the penis enters a woman’s vagina or a man’s anus, fully or only as far as the circumcision ring, both partners become impure, even if they have not reached puberty; they must consequently perform ablutions.

            A woman who has contracted a continuing marriage does not have the right to go out of the house without her husband’s permission; she must remain at his disposal for the fulfilment of any one of his desires, and may not refuse herself to him except for a religiously valid reason. If she is totally submissive to him, the husband must provide her with her food, clothing, and lodging, whether or not he has the means to do so. A woman who refuses herself to her husband is guilty, and may not demand from him food, clothing, lodging, or any later sexual relations; however, she retains the right to be paid damages if she is repudiated.

            If a father (or paternal grandfather) marries off his daughter (or granddaughter) in her absence without knowing for a certainty that she is alive, the marriage becomes null and void as soon as it is established that she was dead at the time of the marriage.

            It is not illegal for an adult male to ‘thigh’ or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her. [“The Little Green Book”]

            If a man commits adultery with an unmarried woman, and subsequently marries her, the child born of that marriage will be a bastard unless the parents can be sure it was conceived after they were married. A child born of an adulterous father is legitimate.Ali [son in law of Mohammed], having cut off the hands of two thieves, treated their wounds and offered them his hospitality, and this affected them so much that they became utterly devoted to him; or again when he heard that the marauding army of Muawiyah had abused a woman of one of the tribes, he was so upset and moved to pity he declared: “If a man died after such an occurrence, no one could blame him.” And yet, despite a nature as sensitive as that, Ali bared his sword and hacked the perpetrators to pieces. This is the meaning of justice.- “The Sayings of Ayatollah Khomeini, Political, Philosophical, Social and Religious” ISBN number 0-553-14032-9.

            Paedophilia legal in Iran

            In June, 2002 Iranian authorities approved a law raising the age at which girls can marry without parental consent from 9 to 13. The elected legislature actually passed the bill in 2000, but the “Guardian Council”, a 12-man body of conservative clerics, vetoed it as contradicting Islamic Sharia law.

            Iran’s clerical establishment insists that the marriage of young girls is a means to combat immorality. The Expediency Council, which arbitrates between the elected parliament and the theocratic Guardian Council, timidly passed the measure. The law however does not change the age at which children can get married (nine for girls and 14 for boys), but says that girls below the age of 13 and boys younger than 15 need their parents’ permission and the approval of a “Righteous Court.” Reformists state that the new law does not protect children, since most of those who marry at such a young age do so by force.

            A religious decree by Khomeini ordered that girl prisoners who are virgins must be raped before execution, to prevent them from entering heaven. A Guard conducts the rape the night before execution. The next day, a marriage certificate is issued by a mullah, who sends it to the girl’s family, along with a box of chocolates as a wedding gift.

            It is quite common in Iran for older men to marry children, as long as they pay the appropriate bride-price to the girl’s family.

            This basically means that a father can sell his daughter to whomever he wants, whilst the mad mullahs see this as a means of maintaining purity. We prefer to call this child prostitution and rape, especially given that Iran’s clerics approve of the ‘tradition’ of ‘temporary marriage’ (Mut’a) , which can last less than 24 hours and may be repeated as many times as desired. This form of exploitation is widespread and legitimises sex with young children. The man may even visit his temporary wife every weekend at her father’s house, for about $10 per visit.

            Khomeini on prostitution and Mut’a (temporary marriage)
            “It is permissible to do Mut’a with an adulteress, but with aversion, particularly if she is a well-known prostitute. If Mut’a is done with her, she should be told to give-up her profession.”

          • wargame1

            The Shit doctrine came mostly from the Talmud , thats why we see this type of wired doctrine .

          • TheUSequalsTheIS

            my assssss is the house of allah 🙂

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            You still trying to educate the ones with hearts of stone and shit for brains. Ashbudik fiyoun, trikiyoun God made sheep and goats some have horns and some don’t. Let them choose yistiflou.

          • Hind Abyad

            Maaloom yistiflou, bas haida akbar hmar, akbar kazab maal ell saoudieh. they took total control of blogs to talk among themselves.

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            Its not only the blogs that they have taken over, hameeer and kazabein are many better to not feed them.

          • Hind Abyad
          • Hind Abyad

            ma bahref, mahomry shif nass mtloun.

          • wargame1

            What is wahabism? Quote from their book with reference. If you do not know what the belief of the wahabis then why are you making yourself as an utter stupid? Tell me what is wahabism ? If you ask me about the Shias , Christians , Jews , Hindus or any other religion I can always bring reference from their books. Now tell me about the wahabis quote from their books

          • Hind Abyad

            It’s Sheikh ibn Abdul Wahhab of Najd.
            Wahhabism is this man’s vision of Islam the Saudi family adopted, say.. why don’t you ask Saudi King what’s Wahhabi, not me. http://historyofislam.com/contents/resistance-and-reform/shaykh-ibn-abdul-wahhab-of-najd/

            Taliban religious doctrine inspired by Saudi Wahhabism, i don’t read this, just answering the reference from their books.. ex:
            http://www.afghanistannewscenter.com/news/2001/september/sep24w2001.html

            ..and the Islamic Supreme Council.
            (that explains the presence of Khazar Moslems in Middle East), as if we didn’t have enough of Khazar Jews IN Israel, both have no genetic links to the Middle East. They came to kill Arabs in their lands, Arabs were always Arabs worst enemies..
            The mad Arab Calif is killing Arabs..That’s why Arabs will always be losers. Jews don’t kill each other even if they are from different Jewish religious beliefs.

            http://www.islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/anti-extremism/7-islamic-radicalism-its-wahhabi-roots-and-current-representation.html

          • wargame1

            I asked you to quote some doctrine from the wahabi book if it exist

          • Hind Abyad

            As quoted by Muhamad your Prophet.. https://najd2.wordpress.com/

          • guest

            – You see their Hypocrisy, when they or their kind say perverted things then no one among them says Shit but if some one who is not them tries to relay Truth straight from their revered books, fatwas, sermons, husseiniyat / majalis speeches, … they get all angry n start abusing, calling names, cursing, venting, intimidating n try to stop him from showing the Truth !
            No wonder they are enemies of Islam n Muslims disguised as well wishers…!

            TheUSequalsTheIS guest
            8 hours ago
            mohammad was a pedophile for sure, mohammad raped small girls for sure too.
            he was most likely gay too and most likely had sex wid dead ppl while he most likely was a transsexual person.

            TheUSequalsTheIS wargame1
            8 hours ago
            islam is nasty, allah is nasty, mohammad is nasty

          • guest

            Levelling Graves – “Wahhabi Extremism” as per Shiite Claims?
            [Levelling Graves – “Wahhabi Extremism” as per Shiite Claims or True Islamic Orthodoxy?]

            Following on the from recent relocation of the tomb of the Prophet (saw) debacle vociferously promoted by various Shia groups and outlets such as Press TV, Ahlul Bayt TV, “Hidayat” TV and numerous others who latch on to anything anti-Saudi, have a read of the following narrations on the topic:

            “The Messenger of Allah (saw) said: Don’t take my grave as qiblah nor as mosque, because Allah cursed the yahood when they took graves of their prophets as mosques.” [1]

            “And Samah ibn Mihran asked him about visiting graves and building mosques upon them. And he said: As for visiting graves, there is nothing wrong with this, but do not build it near mosques.” [2]

            “The Messenger of Allah (saw) forbade praying upon graves, or to sit upon them or build upon them.” [3]

            Ali (ra) said: The Messenger of Allah (saw) sent me to tear down the graves and break the images. [4]

            Ali (ra) said: The Messenger of Allah (saw) sent me to Madina, and said: Do not leave an image but that you have effaced it, nor a grave but that you have levelled it, nor a dog but that you have killed it. [5]

            And from Ali b. Ibrahim, from his father, from ibn Abi Umayr, from Hammad b. Uthman, from Abi Abdullah [Ja’far Al Sadiq] (as) said: My father [The INFALLIBLE according to Shi’a] said to myself in a day of illness: When I die bathe me and shroud me, and raise my grave by four fingers, and sprinkle with water. [6]

            (In explaining the above narration): “Graves should be four fingers above the ground, no dirt other other than the dirt of the grave should be placed on it.” [7]

            Abu Abdillah (Ja’far As-Sadiq) – ‘alayhis-salam said,” Do not build upon the graves and dont decorate the roofs of houses because the Messenger of Allah – sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam – hated this. [8]

            ‘Ali bin Ja’far asked our 7th Imaam about building upon graves and sitting (by them). He said: One cannot build upon it, and sit, and plaster, and “clay” it over [9]

            ——–
            You’re probably expecting these to be found in Bukhari, Muslim or quoted in the writings of Ibn Taymiyyah or Muhammad ibn ‘Abdil Wahhab, but no, believe it or not these are found in Shi’a books and attributed to the Prophet (saw), Ali (ra) and their (infallible as they claim) Imams.

            [1]. Sheikh As-Saduk “Man la yahduruhul fagih” vol 1, p 178, hadis# 532;
            Allama Majlisi “Biharul Anwar” vol 79, p 20;
            Allama Majlisi “Biharul anwar” vol 80, p 313
            [2]. Man Laa Yahdurul Faqih – As-Saduq 1/187
            [3]. Tahdheeb Al-Ahkaam – At-Tusi 1/461
            [4]. Al-Mahaasin – Al-Barqi narrates from An-Nawfali 8/6614
            [5]. Al-Mahaasin – Al-Barqi narrates from An-Nawfali 8/6615
            [6]. Wasail Ash-Shi’a – Al-Hurr Al-‘Aamili
            [7]. Al-Mabsoot Fi Fiqhil Imaamiyyah – At-Tusi derives this ruling from the narration of Ja’far As-Sadiq in [6]
            [8]. Al-Mahaasin – Al-Barqi narrates from his father from An-Nadr bin Suwaid. Also another chain from Yusuf bin ‘Aqeel, from Muhammad bin Qais who narrated it from Abu Ja’far 9/6616
            [9]. Al-Toosi, Tahdheeb Al-aHkaam, vol. 1, ch. 23, pg. 461, hadeeth # 148
            Al-Toosi, Al-IstibSaar, vol. 1, ch. 128, pg. 217, hadeeth # 1
            Al-Aamilee, Wasaa’il Al-Shee’ah, vol. 3, ch. 44, pg. 210, hadeeth # 3426
            Al-Majlisi, Bihaar Al-Anwaar, vol. 3, ch. 12, pg. 79
            ‘Alee ibn Ja’far (brother of 7th Imaam ), Masaa-il ‘Alee ibn Ja’far, pg. 212, hadeeth # 460
            Grading: Al-Majlisi said this hadeeth is Muwaththaq KalSaHeeH (Reliable (taken as a) Saheeh (hadeeth)) –> Milaadh Al-Akhyaar, vol. 3, pg. 298
            The reason why it is considered Muwaththaq (Reliable) is mainly because of ‘Alee ibn Asbaat, he is 100% thiqah, but people have differed on his madhhab. However, Al-Khoei said that ‘Alee ibn Asbaat is a Shi’ah Imaami and his madhhab is good. (See: Al-Khoei, Mu’jam Rijaal Al-Hadeeth, vol. 11, pg. 260, under person # 7923).

            ——–

            So surprise surprise, it turns out the mainstream Shi’a stance as reported by multiple narrations from the giants of Shiaism, on building over graves and levelling them is exactly the same as that of Ahlus-Sunnah! So why now do you allow the building of gigantic wasteful shrines made of gold over the Imams and every random deceased Shiite personality when you have been commanded to not do so? Why the pilgrimages, the monetary offerings, the calling out to deceased imams for your needs when all such routes to polytheism have been cut off? In fact the wordings of your narrations are exactly the same as ours in Bukhari, so how will you then claim that these teachings are from “narrow-minded, literalist, extremist, Saudi Wahhabi teachings” when it is the mainstream orthodox Islamic position on graves?

            Press TV and Ahlul Bayt TV are constantly streaming news reports of levelled graves as the actions of the “Wahhabi movement following a twisted interpretation of Islam.” Well O Shia, will you now accuse your own scholars and religion of being a twisted interpretation as the SAME narrations and position on graves are found in your so-called “School of Thought” and your scholars? No of course not, because Shiaism is now a polytheistic grave business of extremism, in which the Imams are deified as gods regardless of warnings of Shirk and Quranic injunctions.

            A senior Shi’a scholar from Bahrain when confronted with one of these narrations, and his weak excuse as he worms out of the natural question of “…then why such massive, wasteful golden shrines?”

            Keep this in mind next time the inevitable article lambasting “Wahhabis” and promoting the “wonderful spirituality” of Shia grave worship and building of tombs is hypocritically brought up and shared. Keep this in mind when “Wahhabi destruction of graves in Baqee'” is once again decades on brought up by the Shi’a, and challenge them on these deceitful, hypocritical claims.

          • wargame1

            All the grave worshipers hate the sunnis. They like that low crawl towards a dead Arab’s grave.

          • man-o-war

            Do you hate the grave worshipers?

          • wargame1

            No I do not hate them for that. I hate when they make that worship as if its a doctrine of Islam. As a Muslim we know clearly that calling to the dead or worship their grave is forbidden in Islam. So if someone attribute this practice as coming from Islam then I will try to expose tham. BUT people who worship Idol grave , cockroaches , Snake, Tree etc not subject to punishment because they do it simply because they learn it from their ancestors. It is strictly prohibited to attack ANY places of worship by the Muslims. We know that they are worshiping something other than Allah so our duty is to convey the message of the oneness of Allah in a best possible manner. If they do not return then thats their right given by Allah. The culprits are those who use the name of Islam and then practice evil and Islam gets the bad name. I hate those frauds

          • man-o-war

            Couldn’t they just be paying their respect to the deceased? Saying a prayer to God not the deceased.

          • wargame1

            They can do what they like when it has become their religious rituals but not in the name of Islam when the companion of the prophet and the prophet himself never did such thing. Innovation is dangerous. Islam allow the freedom of religion but A Muslim will need to safe guard the religion of Islam from innovation. The Christian and the Jews divided themselves with more than 70 sect and today the Muslims are also divided more than the Christians and the Jews.

          • man-o-war

            Well, easy solution. Muslims should only live in a Muslim country. Everyone is happy and nobody will feel that their religion is being threatened with innovation

          • wargame1

            Muslims doesnt threaten other religion. Its not started by those Daesh dogs. Islam was started in Arabia and it spreaded far and wide. When you see the majority are Muslims in many countries then you know that their popular choice was Islam. Those people didnt fall from the sky as a ready made Muslim. They were reverted to Islam.

          • TheUSequalsTheIS

            islam is nasty, allah is nasty, mohammad is nasty

          • guest

            Really, Zoroastrianism / Majoosism, Ahura Mazda, Zarathushtra / Zoroaster is NASTY !?

            Thanks Majoosi, the slave of Shits for letting the world know !!!

          • TheUSequalsTheIS

            ok

          • wargame1

            To you.

          • TheUSequalsTheIS

            plus a lot of others 😉

          • zabada

            isis is not wahabis..only one or two of them…Most of them are pure sunnis.

          • Hind Abyad

            Top ISIS leaders are from the Caucase. Georgian and Chechen, like the ginger head with Arab name Shishani- http://www.chechensinsyria.com/?p=22986#more-22986

          • wargame1

            Who are the wahabis ? What book they read? What are their doctrine?

          • wargame1

            ISIS are the Khawarij Dogs of the hell fire. Why do you call them sunni where there is no support for them from any sunni scholars? The biggest Syrian rebel group expelled these Daeshdogs from their rank long before.

    • wargame1

      Very strong writing. Mashallah. I would like to suggest that you break it down in few parts. Its then easy to read and keep the concentration. I know its sometimes difficult to make short but if you divide it point by point then its possible to make them short.

      • guest

        Hope this helps.

      • zabada

        America destroysunni glory in Iraq..and favor politic to syiah..The prophet said..on you with the majority..syiah only about 10%..Wahabi less than that.so which one you must convert to. Syiah is a political movement from the beginning at the times of umar alkattab.When Persian fall at the hand of islam..Persian find many ways to claim their glory back..so they planted political doctrine in islam..That why wilayah alfiqh is one of their believe pillars ..it is not in Quran or alhadith.They made up the pillar in order to gain politic.At the past people are using swords to gain politic.So they engage in many wars on sunni at the past ..Sunni fight back..to plant instability at the times.Syiah celebrated the day of the killing on Hussain..otherwise Syiah is nor celebrated the day of killing on Umar and ,Uthman.The two also had been killed.Why..because they are going to planted hatred to Sunni side because it is sunni who killing Hussain..( bad sunnis)..as other there are bad sunnis.Syiah take advantage by that incident to enrage muslims to fight sunni at the time.Many people drove to them.,since there are too many ignorant people at the time,even now.The hatred to sunni side at the time divided muslims in two Syiah and Sunni.Syiah continue to plant too many weird believe in islam..deluded islam to a cult..since there are not a single great scholar among them at the beginning of their revolt on sunni..all Syiah twelve Imam is sunni and not a Syiah…Mut,ah…cutting their back and head…likely to Hinduism..who do the same…to show their grief..also it is not in any authentic verses..they made up this all in order to deluding people.Syiah is a rebels religion at the past.Their hard life as rebels incubate their bad believe and bad behave and they are prolong this bad believe behave till now.You see how Assad Syiah are killing sunnis in Syria..even before sunnis revolt on Syiah in Syria.Syiah always curse Abu Bakar,umar,Uthman,They even called the three as great idol of Qurais and a kafir..non muslims otherwise .sunni pay great respect to Umar,Abu Bakar and uthman..if you see all the events..how can sunni and syiah can live togethe..side by side..?That why sunni can,t live beside Syiah who are an oppressor,having weird behave,..and their behaveand their believe is nothing to do with islam..all great scholars in sunni regard Syiah is an infidels…if Shiits are not going to eradicate too many weird believe and eradicate their bad behave..and they are not..so sunni can,t accept them and revolt on them to protect their family,to protect teir believe, from Syiah bad believe and bad behave ..who are turn as infidel from the beginning….at the times of Umar alkattab..till now .Persian left their former religion,Majusi and convert to their bad ulema,s religion ,who made up many bad believe ,who deluded people in order to gains politic and deluded people for their lust..That is Syiah.It is nothing to do with Islam.Syiah is really an infidel…That sunni revolt on syiah in Iraq.America dethrone saddam in order to palnt instabilty in Arab world on behalf of israel.They know sunni will revolt after America favor politic to Syiah..hence there are wars and killing to the end….and Israel survive.That why America try to evolve Iran Syiah and Turkey to fight Isis in order to prolong wars and bring the wars in full scale among muslims.And again israel survive for many decades in future,America take advantage on tribalism in Arab world to destroy them.The west is in the hand Zionist Jews movement who turned whites western people to white Zionist,ready to fight and die for their master,Zionist bankers in the west.Even so, not all of them advocate this new religion,Zionism.Many of European is loyal people and really a good people.These whites oppose and hate Zionist movement.That all.

        • wargame1

          There is no such thing call wahabi. Its a derogatory term used by the Shia and the Sufis in order to identify the sunnis. Shia religion was invented by a Jew and their doctrine is mostly from the Talmud. They cover it with Islam to fool the Muslims. Now why are you posting this off topic? I asked you to bring proof about your claim that Al-Mahdi will supposedly come from Iraq. Bring it on and stop posting off topic.

          • zabada

            wahabi is exist..no word if there are no object.Many of them now turn to sunni..left only some of them.in Saudi it is 15% of them.Muhammad Abdul wahab,from Najad is their refomer..mujaddid.In sunni he is an apostate.Google out Horn of satan from Najad ..Invented a cult in 18 century in Saudi Arabia.But Wahabis have eradicate many of Muhammad Abdul wahab,s teaching.They have assimilate themselves to sunnis. Hence and they are still muslims.

          • wargame1

            The term wahabi exist among the Shia and the Shit eating sufis like you. Once you use that term shows your hate towards the sunnis. Muhammad Abdul Wahab was a great sunni scholar. The Najd is in Iraq and the Horn of Shaitan will appear from Iraq, Najd means high ground and back then there were 13 places called Najd. So we know from the other hadis that Najd where the horn of Shaitan will rise is in Iraq. Again you twist the hadis

          • wargame1

            Whoever badmouth against Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab are those Shit eating Sufis and Shias because both of these cockroaches worship grave and Muhammad Abdul Wahab exposed them. Bring some thing against him from his doctrine and then we will verify it with the hadis. If his teaching contradicts the hadis and the Quran then he can be wrong but if his teaching are supported by Quran and hadis BUT oppose the Shia/Sufi teaching then we know why you have problem with wahabis

          • zabada

            Now I identified you..you are pure wahabi..it is o.k ..they are still Muslims.May god pardon some of their ignorance and arrogant.Peace.

          • wargame1

            I dont have any problem if I am called an wahabi. This is a compliment for me as Muhammad Abdul Wahab was a great sunni scholar and its the Shias and the Sufis oppose the teaching of Islam but they cant directly oppose the teaching of the Prophet so they use some terms and go indirectly to demoze the sunni Islam. I have asked you over and over again to bring some reference about the supposed wahabi but you have failed. There is no such reference. The term wahabi was used by the French to identify the sunnis and then the Shit/Sufis adopted that term.

          • zabada

            heh..heh..heh.Google wahabi..horn of Satan..sorry if you still angry.I ll try to show you the solid truth.

          • wargame1

            I want to prove your claim of Najd from the hadis. If you fail to prove it then I will bring hadis to prove that Najd is in Iraq. So post those hadis which supposedly say najd is in Iraq

          • zabada

            once more you can,t help you self.Read on web.it is too long to write in here.I m not one of Huffaz.

          • wargame1

            I want to see where the teaching of Muhammad Abdul wahab went against the Quran and the sunnah. Show me that

          • zabada

            you pray solat hajat..ask god where he is now..Pray solat hajat..who are wahabis..God is the first teacher to all human kind, even animals.Full stop.

          • wargame1

            Muta son of a bitch tell me some wrong teaching of Muhammad Ibn Wahab. If you cant find it then you know nothing about him just parroting the Shiat and Sufi claim. What is the problem that you cant prove any single thing?

          • wargame1

            WHO CLAIM THAT NAJD IS IN SAUDI ARABIA? ONLY THE SHITS AND THE SUFIS
            The Messenger of Allaah (Peace be upon him) said, “O Allaah bestow your blessings on our Shaam. O Allaah bestow your blessings on our Yemen.” The people said, “O Messenger of Allaah, and our Najd.” I think the third time the Prophet, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, said, “There (in Najd) will occur earthquakes, trials and tribulations, and from their appears the Horn of Satan.” (Sahih Bukhari)
            NOW WHERE IS THIS NAJD WHERE THE HORN OF SAITAN APPEARS?

          • zabada

            So Najad is Siberia ?.

          • wargame1

            We will find it out from the hadis. Lets see whether the hadis says it in Siberia according to your claim.

          • wargame1

            Amongst the scholars that are mentioned who referred the hadeeth on Najd to Iraq were: al-Khattaabee, al-Kirmaanee, al-Aynee, an-Nawawee, ibn Hajr etc. The reasons behind this are numerous and clear:

            1.The generality of the hadeeth pertaining to the fitna coming from the east.

            Al-Bukhaaree includes this hadeeth in the chapter: “The affliction will appear from the East”

            NOW THAT MINI DAJJAL IMRAN HUSSAIN pointed his finger to Great Britain as East!!! But the direction of East from Medina is Iraq Iran etc. So We have to concentrate on those countries which are in the East. i.e. Iraq Iran

          • wargame1

            From the father of Saalim: The Prophet (Peace be upon him) stood up besides the pulpit (and pointed towards the EAST) and said: “Afflictions are there! Afflictions are there! From where appears the horn of Satan” or he said, “the horn of the Sun”

            From ibn Umar that he said: I heard the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu alyahi wa sallam, saying while facing the east: “Indeed Afflictions are there, from where appears the Horn of Satan.”

            The hadeeth of Najd under discussion as the Location is in the EAST i.e. Iraq Iran. Similar hadeeth can be found in Saheeh Muslim (volume 4 no.’s. 6938). Hadeeth that give the same meaning can be found in Saheeh Muslim (volume 1 no.’s 83+)

            NOW WHERE IN THE EAST???????????

          • wargame1

            The early trials and tribulations arose from the east, many of them actually in Iraaq itself. The Rafida Shits of Iran separated themselves which are one of the greatest FITNAH among the Muslims. SO TURN YOUR NECK TOWARDS EAST
            Ibn Hajr al-Asqalaanee said after quoting the words of al-Khattaabee explaining the meaning of Qarn (horn), “and others have said that the People of the East were disbelievers at that time and the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, informed us that the trials and tribulations would arise from that direction and it was as he said. And the first of the trials that arose, arose from the direction of the east and they were the reason for the splitting of the Muslim ranks, and this is what Satan loves and delights in. Likewise the innovations appeared from that direction.” [Fath al-Baaree 13/58 in commentary to the hadeeth of Najd]

          • wargame1

            Amongst the trials that arose in Iraq and the east was the martyrdom of Ali Ibn Abu Talib, the martyrdom of the grandson of the Prophet, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, the first battle between the Muslims occurred in Iraq, The Khawarij in Haruriah in Iraq, the Mongol invasion in Iraq and then US invasion in Iraq and many many more fitnah. So why the Shits and the sufis ignore this and point their dirty finger towards Saudi Arabia? Because they get inspiration from Shaitan

          • wargame1

            Imaam Nawawee mentions that one of the greatest trials to appear from the East will be the appearance of the Dajjaal. We can verify this from the Hadis in Sahih Muslim.

          • wargame1

            From the innovations that appeared in the east and specifically Iraq, was many of the early deviant sects amongst them the Qadariyyah , the Jahmiyyah and their offshoots etc…. If you are a Sufi or a Shit then you will love this group.

          • wargame1

            At the time of the Prophet, (Peace be upon him) there were 13 places known as Najd [according to ‘Najd Qarnu ash-Shaytaan’] depending on where one was. This because Najd means a raised/elevated land. Therefore the Arabs referred to lands that were elevated with respect to them as Najd. One of the most commonly referred to areas at that time as Najd was Iraq.But we will not immediately conclude Najd in Iraq or Saudi Arabia rather we will look for evidence in the hadis

          • zabada

            The Prohet said..”Beware sheikh from Najad..he is syaitan”.So who are sheikhul Islam in iraq that originated in Najad ?.It is only Muhammad Abdul Wahab from Najad who pointed by Ibnu saud to be Syeikhul islam in Saudi Arabia.None of any Ulemas who had been Syeikhul islam in Saudi except Muhammad Abdul wahab and he is really from Najad.If not Muhammad Abdul Wahab,so who are that Syeikhul Islam that called Syaitan by The Prophet pbuh.Name me that skheikhul islam?,And he must be from najad.You post too many hadith.Now find who are Sheikh of Syaitan?.

          • wargame1

            The Najd for those people living in Madeenah in the direction of the East would be Iraq.
            Ibn Hajr said: “al-Khattaabee said: ‘the najd in the direction of the east, and for the one who is in Madeenah then his Najd would be the desert of Iraq and it’s regions for this is to the east of the People of Madenah. The basic meaning of Najd is that which is raised/elevated from the earth in contravention to al-Gawr for that is what is lower than it. Tihaamah [the coastal plain along the south-western and southern shores of the Arabian Peninsula] is entirely al-Gawr and Mecca is in Tihaamah.’” We will investigate further and we will find out the truth and the deception of the Shits and the Shit eating Sufi

          • wargame1

            Al-Muwatta Hadith Hadith 54.30
            Concerning the East

            Malik related to me that he heard that Umar ibn al-Khattab wanted to go to Iraq, and Kabal-Ahbar said to him, “Do not go there, amir al-muminin. There is nine-tenths of sorcery there and it is the place of the rebellious jinn and the disease which the doctors are unable to cure.”

            SO Iraq was always the place of Fitnah and there are many historical evidence.

          • zabada

            Muawiyah also using hadith to deluding people when he fought Ali kw.I not believe on wahabis.

          • wargame1

            The hadeeth in Saheeh Muslim [4/1505 no.6943]
            Saalim bin Abdullaah bin Umar said: O people of Iraaq, how strange is it that you ask about the minor sins but commit the major sins? [The killing of al-Husayn] I heard my father, Abdullaah bin Umar narrating that he heard the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, saying while pointing his hand to the east: “Indeed the turmoil would come from this side, from where appear the horns of Satan and you would strike the necks of one another…”
            The variations in wording of the hadeeth of Najd that leave no doubt whatsoever as to what it refers to. NO WONDER WHY THE SHITS AND THE SUFIS POINT THEIR FINGER IN ANOTHER DIRECTION

          • wargame1

            THE HADIS CONNECTING IRAQ NAJD AND HORN OF SATAN
            The hadeeth of ibn Umar Reported by Abu Nu’aym in al-Hilya (6/133), “O Allaah bestow your blessings on our Madeenah, and bestow your blessings on our Mecca, and bestow your blessings on our Shaam(Syria), and bestow your blessings on our Yemen, and bestow your blessings in our measuring (fee saa’inaa wa muddinaa).” A person said, ” O Messenger of Allaah and in our Iraq” and so he turned away from him and said, “there will occur earthquakes, trials and tribulations and there will appear the horn of Satan.”

            SO THE HORN OF SATAN APPEARS IN IRAQ !! NOW POINTING YOUR SUFI FINGER IN SAUDI ARABIA IS FUTILE

          • wargame1

            NAJD HORN OF SATAN AND IRAQ
            The hadeeth of ibn Umar reported in at-Tabaraanee in ‘al-Awsat’ that the Messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam prayed Fajr and then faced the people and said, “O Allaah bestow your blessings on our Madeenah, O Allaah bestow your blessings in our measuring, O Allaah bestow your blessings in our Shaam and our Yemen.” A person said, “And Iraq O Messenger of Allaah?” He said, “from there arises the horn of Satan and the trials and tribulations would come like mounting waves.”
            Ibn Hajr al-Haythamee says in his ‘Mujma az-Zawaa’id’ (3/305 – chapter ‘collection of du’aas made for (Madeenah)’): ‘its narrators are trustworthy and precise.’

          • wargame1

            HORN OF SATAN NAJD AND IRAQ
            The hadeeth of ibn Abbaas reported by at-Tabaraanee in ‘al-Kabeer’ that the Prophet, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, supplicated and said, “O Allaah bestow your blessings on our Shaam and Yemen.” A person from amongst the people said, “O Prophet of Allaah and Iraq?” He said, “indeed there is the Horn of Satan, and the trials and tribulations will come like mounting waves, and indeed harshness/coarseness is in the east.”
            Al-Haythamee says: “it’s narrators are trustworthy and precise.”

          • zabada

            Horn of Satan s in Najd.Not Iraq.I read the hadith too many times.

          • wargame1

            The virtues of Bani Tameem OF SAUDI ARABIA. Bani Tameem constitute the majority of the inhabitants of the Najd that is in Saudi Arabia. HERE IS THE TROUBLE OF THE SHITS AND THE SUFI

            The hadeeth of Saheeh BukhaRI reported by Abu Hurayra (RA): “I have loved the people of the tribe of Bani Tameem, ever since I heard three things the Messenger of Allaah , sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, said about them. I heard him saying, ‘these people (of the tribe of Bani Tameem) would stand firm against the Dajjaal.’ When the Saddaqat from that tribe came, the Messenger of Allaah , sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, said, “these are the Saddaqat (charitable gifts) of our folk.” Aa’ishah had a slave girl from that tribe, and the Prophet , sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam, said to Aa’ishah, ‘manumit her as she is a descendant of Ismaa’eel, alayhis salaam.’”[Hadeeth no. 2543, 4366 of al-Fath] Ibn Hajr al-Asqalaanee said, “this hadeeth also contains a clear mention of the excellence and superiority of Bani Tameem.” [Fath 5/217]

            NOW YOU SHITS AND SUFIS HAVE BEEN BADMOUTHING THE PEOPLE OF SAUDI ARABIA WITHOUT ANY PROOF. MAY THE WRATH OF ALLAH FALL ON TO THE LIARS

          • zabada

            That why wahabis collaborated with the west to take najad from King Husain who rule Mecca at the time.

          • zabada

            Wahabis is not from Bani Tamim..most of them are Badween.

          • wargame1

            WHY THE FOLLOWER OF DAJJAL THE SHITS AND THE SUFI BADMOUTH AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF SAUDI ARABIA OF BANU TAMIM WHO PRECISELY LIVE IN NAJD IN SAUDI ARABIA???????
            The hadeeth of Ikrimah from one of the Companions reported in the Musnad of Imaam Ahmad and in it occurs, “do not say of Bani Tameem anything but good, for indeed they are the severest of people in attacking the Dajjaal.”
            Al-Haythamee says: “its narrators are those of the Saheeh.” [Mujma 10/48 chpt: What is reported concerning Bani Tameem]

            It is not strange that Bani Tameem would be the most severe against the Dajjaal, because the tools required to combat him are none but a correct and firm belief and proper beneficial knowledge. Alhumdulillaah many of the scholars of Saudi are from the most noble and skilled scholars on the face of this earth today, firmly upon the way of our noble Messenger, sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam. SO YOU LOSER CANT BRING ANY PROOF AGAINST THEM BUT LOVE TO BADMOUTH AGAINST THEM.

          • zabada

            The followers of Dajjal (Western people)is Ibnu Saud and Muhammad abdul wahab who collaborated with the west in order to gain politic in Jaziratul Arab at the past.They killed many Sunnis at the times.Or you write your version of history books ,likely to Syiah have done,in order to deluding people to sided on your Wahabi doctrines.

          • gst

            Who will be the Followers of Dajjal, will they be the Shiites, Zionists, etc. ??

            Here are some bitter facts from Shiite’s own Books and Sources which most non-muslims, Sunnis, and even Shias aren’t aware of. Hopefully this will clear the air as to who are and will be on the side of Dajjal upon his arrival.

            The hypocrites, liars, impersonators, etc. which we usually see here and everywhere else will keep propagating falsehoods and fitna as they are the Agents and Followers of Dajjal who sold their souls for the un-Godly desires, beliefs, etc. they pursue.

            Lets examine what do Shia’s books say about what Shia’s Imam Mahdi will do after he appears?

            1. Shia’s Mahdi kills and does not accept repentance

            ان القائم امر ان يسير بالقتل ولا يستتيب احدا

            “The Qa’im (Shia’s Mahdi) has been ordered (by God) to go forth killing (people) and does not ask for or accept repentance of anyone.” (Al-Numani, Al-Ghaiba , p. 153 and Baqir Al-Majlisi’s Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, page 353)

            ان الامام المهدي (ع) سوف يضع السيف في كل المنحرفين …فيستاصلهم جميعا ولا يقبل اعلانهم التوبة

            “Al-Imam Al-Mahdi will strike with the sword all those who deviate (meaning deviate from Shiism or the new religion he will be spreading) … and will eradicate all of them and will not accept the declaration of repentance.” (Al-Sadr, Tarikh ma ba’d Zuhur (History of After the Emergence) p. 558 )

            2. Shia’s Mahdi will be cruel towards defenceless people

            القائم له أن يقتل المولي ويجهز على الجريح

            الغيبة للنعماني ص121

            “It is permissible for Al-Qa’im to kill Al-Mawla (the captive person) and finish off (kill) the wounded person.” (Al-Numani Al-Ghaiba, p. 121)

            3. Shia’s Mahdi is sent as a Vengeance

            : عن عبد الرحمن القصير عن أبي جعفر عليه السلام

            إن الله بعث محمدا رحمة وبعث القائم نقمة : قال

            Abd-Rahman Al-Qaseer reported that Abi Ja’far (a. s.) said:

            “ Allah sent Mohammad (p) as a Mercy, and sends Al-Qa’im (Mahdi) as a Vengeance (Revenge).” (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 314-315)

            Imam Mahdi will take revenge against all the sins (meaning the sinners) since Adam (a.s). (Muhammad ibn Hasan al-Saffar, Bashairu al-Darajat, p. 83)

            4. Shia’s Mahdi will persecute the Sunni Muslims

            فإذا قام قائم عرضوا كل ناصب عليه فإن أقر بالإسلام وهي الولاية وإلا ضربت عنقه أو أقر بالجزية فأداها كما يؤدي أهل الذمة

            52/357 بحار الأنوار , تفسير فرات ص 100

            “ When Qa’im (Shia refer to their Mahdi as Al-Qa’im) appears, they (the Shia) will bring every Nasib (a term used by Shia to refer to Sunnis) to him (Shia’s Mahdi). If he (the Nasib) accepts Islam, and it is recognition of Al-Wilaya (meaning Imam Ali is Representative of God), he will be freed; otherwise his head will be cut off. Alternatively, if he accepts jizyah (penalty tax), he will be required to pay as a Zhimmi (Zhimmi is a status given by Islam to Christians & Jews).. ( Baqir Al-Majlisi’s Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, page 373 and Furat ibn Ibrahim’s Tafseer , page 100)

            According to Shia’s book, Baqir Al-Majlisi’s Haq Al-Yaqeen, page 527, Imam Mahdi will kill all Sunni Scholars:

            يناكحوننا ويوارثوننا الى ان يظهر المهدي حيث يبدا بقتل علماء اهل السنة ثم عوامهم
            “They (Sunnis) may marry from us and inherit from us until the Mahdi emerges. He starts by killing the scholars of the Sunnis and then ordinary Sunnis.” (Baqir Al-Majlisi’s Haq Al-Yaqeen)

            According to Shia’s book, Al-Kulaini’s Al-Rawdah min al-Kafi, Vol. 8, page 160, the Sunnis who do not accept his teachings of Shiism will be beheaded.

            In a narration attributed to Imam Abu Abdullah [a.s.], (Shia’s 6th Imams), he says: “As mankind realize what is going to be done by Al-Qaim (Shia’s Mahdi) when he appears, most people will prefer not to see him because of the killings he will do to mankind, it makes most mankind say: ‘ He is not from the House of Muhammad, if he were from the House of Muhammad, he would certainly have compassion.’ ” (Baqir Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, page 353)

            Nuaim bin Hammad’s Kitab Al-Fitan mentions a variation of this narration, but says “from the progeny of Fatima” (Prophet Mohammad’s daughter and wife of Imam Ali), instead of “from the House of Muhammad”.

            Sayid Sadr states: “Indeed, most the killings (by the Mahdi & his followers) that happen to mankind will be directed against the Muslims. Then, he (Shia’s Mahdi) will distribute a copy of his book (a new scripture, not the current Quran)…” (Sayyid Husein Al-Musawi, Li Allah Thumma Li Tarikh, p.137)

            ما لمن خالفنا في دولتنا نصيب إن الله قد أحل لنا دماءهم عند قيام قائمنا

            بحار الأنوار 50/373

            “For those in our (Shia’s) State who differ with us, there is a punishment. God has made their blood Halal (permissible to be shed) when our Qa’im (Shia’s Mahdi) emerges.”( Baqir Al-Majlisi’s Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 50, p. 373)

            مال الناصب وكل شيء يملكه حلال

            وسائل الشيعة للحر العاملي 11/60 , تهذيب الأحكام للطوسي 2/48

            “ The money of the Al-Nasib (the Sunni) is Halal (permissible to be stolen) and every thing he owns is Halal.” ( Al-Tusi, Tahzeeb Al-Ahkam, Vol. 2, p. 48 and Al-Hur Al-Amili, Wasil Al-Shia, Vol. 11, p.60)

            خذ مال الناصب حيثما وجدته وأدفع إلينا الخمس

            وسائل الشيعة للحر العاملي 6/340 , السرائر لابن أدريس ص 484 , تهذيب الأحكام للطوسي 1/384

            “Take the money (meaning by stealing or rip-off) of Al-Nasib (the Sunni) wherever you find it and pay to us Al-Khums (one fifth of the money).” (Al-Tusi,Tahzeeb Al-Ahkam, Vol. 1, p. 384, Ibn Idriss, Al-Sarair p. 484, and Al-Hur Al-Amili, Wasil Al-Shia, Vol. 340, p.6)

            5. Shia’s Imam Mahdi will be an Anti-Arab bigot who will massacre the Arabs

            The following is some of what Shia books say their Mahdi’s massacres of the Arabs:

            ما بقي بيننا وبين العرب إلا الذبح

            الغيبة للنعماني ص155, بحار الأنوار 52/349
            “There will be nothing left between us and the Arabs, except slaughter.” (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 349 and Al-Numani, Al-Ghaiba, p. 155)

            “Al-Muntazar (the Awaited One, meaning Shia’s Mahdi) will walk amongst the Arabs and kill them.” (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 318)

            منهم أحد اتق العرب فإن لهم خبر سوء أما إنه لم يخرج مع القائم

            52/333 بحار الأنوار , الغيبة للنعماني ص254

            “Fear the Arabs because there will be very bad news for them, which is that none from amongst them will come out with Al-Qa’im (Shia’s Mahdi).” (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 333, and Al-Numani, Al-Ghaiba, p. 254) This Shia narration is warning the Arabs of bad things that will happen to Arabs because none of the Arabs, including Shia Arabs, will follow the Mahdi.

            يروي المفيد عن أبي عبدالله أنه قال

            إذا قام القائم من آل محمد عليهم السلام أقام خمسمائة من قريش فيضرب أعناقهم ثم خمسمائة أخر حتى يفعل ذلك ست مرات

            In a Shia narration attributed to Imam Abi Abdullah (Shia’s 6th Imam), he say: “When the Qa’im (Shia’s Mahdi) from the family of Mohammad (peace be upon him) rises, he will resurrect five hundred from Quraish (dead people of Prophet Mohammad’s tribe) and cut off their necks, then another five hundred, until he does this (action) six times.” (Al-Mufeed Al-Tusi, Al-Irshad)

            6. Digging up the graves of the Prophet’s Sahabahs (Companions)

            وأجيء إلى يثرب فأهدم الحجرة وأخرج من بها وهما طريان فآمر بهما تجها البقيع وأمر بخشبتين يصلبان عليهما

            بحار الأنوار ج 53/104-105

            “(When Shia’s Mahdi) Will come to Yathrib (Medina’s old name), and destroy the Al-Hujra Al-Nabawiyya (the Room of Aisha in which Prophet Mohammad (s.a.w.) was buried and later Abu Bakr and Omar were also buried there) and will dig out who is in it while they are lean and will order them to be sent to Al-Baqi and order two pieces of wood to be crucified on them…” (Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, Vol. 53, p. 104 -105)

            The graves of Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq (r.a.) and Umar bin al-Khattab (r.a.) (Prophet Mohammad’s companions and successors as Caliphs) are to be dug up, and they are to be crucified and flogged in front of the crowds. Both of them will be resurrected to receive their sentences. (Ni’matullah Al-Jazairi, Al-Anwar Al-Numaniyah, Vol.2, p. 85 and Baqir Al-Majlisi, Haq al-Yaqeen, Vol. 2, p. 242)

            : عن عبد الرحمن القصير عن أبي جعفر عليه السلام

            إلى القائم ؟ فكيف أخر الله ذلك :قلت ردت إليه الحميراء حتى يجلدها الحد ، وحتى ينتقم لأمه فاطمة ، أما لو قام قائمنا

            إن الله بعث محمدا رحمة وبعث القائم نقمة : قال

            Abd-Rahman Al-Qaseer reported that Abi Ja’far (a. s.) said: “When our Qa’im (Shia’s Mahdi) rises, Al-Humaira (Aisha, Prophet Mohammad’s wife) will be returned (resurrected) so that he flogs her according to the law of hudud, and takes revenge for the Umma (nation or people) of Fatima (meaning the Shia).”

            So, I (Abd-Rahman Al-Qaseer) said: “How come Allah (God) delays this punishment to (be performed by) the Qa’im (Mahdi) ?”

            He said: “ Allah sent Mohammad (p) as a Mercy, and sends Al-Qa’im (Mahdi) as a Vengeance (Revenge).” (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p.314-315)

            7. Shia’s Mahdi will destroy the Ka’bah and the two Holy Mosques of Mecca and Medina

            القائم يهدم المسجد الحرام حتى يرده إلى أساسسه ومسجد الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم وإله إلى أساسه

            بحار الأنوار 52/338 , الغيبة ص 282

            “Al-Qaim (Shia’s Mahdi) will demolish Haram Mosque (in Mecca) down to its foundation and the Messenger’s Mosque (Prophet Mohammad’s s.a.w. Mosque in Medina) down to its foundation.” (Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, vol. 52, p. 338, and Al-Tusi, Al-Ghaibah, p. 282)

            … إذا قام المهدي هدم المسجد الحرام
            الغيبة للطوسي ص282 , الإرشاد للمفيد ص411

            “When Imam Mahdi rises up, he will demolish Al-Haram Mosque ( in Mecca) …’” (Al-Mufid, Al-Irshad. p. 411 and At-Tusi, Kitab al Ghaibah, p. 282)

            أول ما يبدأ به يخرج هذين هل تدري أول ما يبدأ به القائم

            ويكسر المسجد رطبين غضين فيحرقهما ويذريهما في الريح
            بحار الأنوار 52/386

            “Do you know what the Qa’im (Shia’s Mahdi) will start with? What he will start with is that he will dig up/out the graves of these two (Abu Bakr al-Siddiq r.a. and Umar bin al-Khattab r.a., Prophet Mohammad’s companions and successors as Caliphs) while they are still wet and fresh and burn/cremate them and throw them (their ashes) into the wind. And he will break/destroy the Mosque (meaning the holy Al-Haram Mosque of Mecca).” (Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 386)

            8. At the time of Shia’s Mahdi, the Shia will be gathered from all over the World

            This is similar to the notion that the Jews will gathered from around the World, according to Jewish beliefs as well as the Quran)

            عن أحد موالي أبي الحسن عليه السلام قال

            {أينما تكونوا يأت بكم الله جميعا } سألت أبا الحسن عليه السلام عن قوله تعالى

            وذلك والله أن لو قد قام قائمنا يجمع الله إليه شيعتنا من جميع البلدان : قال

            – بحار الأنوار –

            A follower of Imam Abu Al-Hasan (Shia’s 7th Imam) asked him about his interpretation of (verse 148 of Sura Baqara) {From wherever you are, Allah will bring forth (or gather) all of you…}.

            Imam Abu Al-Hasan said: ” When our Qa’im (Imam Mahdi) rises up, Allah will gather for him our Shia from all countries.” (Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar) Please note that the Sunni classical interpretation of this verse is that it pertains to God’s gathering people around the time of the Day of Resurrection.

            9. Jews & prominent Prophets will be among the followers of Shia’s Mahdi

            According to the Shia, the Jews will also be among the followers of Imam Mahdi:

            عن المفضّل بن عمر عن أبي عبد الله قال

            يخرج مع القائم عليه السلام من ظهر الكوفة سبعة وعشرون رجلا من قوم موسى، وسبعة من أهل الكهف ويوشع بن نون وسليمان وأبو دجـانة الأنصاري والمقداد ومالك الأشتر فيكونون بين يديه أنصارا

            الإرشاد للمفيد الطوسي ص402

            Sheikh al-Mufeed has reported in his Al-Irshaad based on al-Mufadhaal ibnu Umar that Imam Abu Abdullah [as] said: “With the Qa’im twenty seven men from the people of Moses (meaning Jews or Israelites), seven from Ahl Al-Kahf (People of the Cave), (prophet) Joshua bin Nun, (prophet) Solomon, Abu Dajana Al-Ansari, Al-Miqdad, Malik Al-Ahtar will come out and they will be his supporters.” (Al-Mufeed Al-Tusi, Al-Irshaad p.402)

            10. Shia’s Imam Mahdi will bring the compete, original Quran

            – “ …The Qur’an which we have in our hands today, has suffered some changes after the Messenger of Allah [pbuh]. Those who collected it after him, dropped and deleted many words and verses, and that the protected Qur’an from such changes and agreeable to the (true & original) revelation of Allah (Ta’ala) is the one which was collected by Ali [as] and guarded until it reached his son Al-Hasan [as] and so on until it ended in the possession of Al-Qa’im (Imam Mahdi) who has it with him today…” (Hashim At-Tubari Al-Bahrani’s Al-Burhaan fi Tafseer al-Qur’an, Introduction: the second premise, Volume 1, p.36, and last paragraph, p. 49)

            The Quran has been purposely altered by the drunkard Caliphs {Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a)}. The present Quran is false; It is the duty of Imam Mehdi to bring it in its original form. When Imam Mahdi comes, the Quran will be recited in its original form. (Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chapter 12, p. 384 & p.479 – Published in India)

            Original Quran will not be known until the manifestation of Imam Mahdi. (Ni’matullah al-Jazairi, Al-Anwar Al-Numania, Vol. 2, p. 360 – Published in Iran)

            The present Quran is abridged (an an abbreviated version) whereas the Original Quran is kept by Imam Mahdi.” (Hazaar Tumhari Das Hamari, p. 553)

            The original Quran (which was compiled by Imam Ali (r.a) will be brought by Imam Mahdi when he appears before the Day of Judgment. (Usul Kaafi, Vol. 2, p. 123)

            11. Shia’s Mahdi will bring and rule based on a New Book of Scriptures

            عن أبي جعفر أنه قال
            فوالله لكأني أنظر إليه بين الركن والمقام يبايع الناس بأمر جديد شديد ، وكتاب جديد ، وسلطان جديد من السماء

            الغيبة للنعماني 107 ص

            A narration attributed to Imam Abi Ja’far (Shia’s 5th Imam): ” By Allah, as if I see him (Imam Mahdi) between Rukn & Maqam (of Kaba, Mecca), people are declaring allegiance (to the Mahdi) based on a new, powerful matter, a new Book (scripture), and a new authority from Heaven.” (Al-Numani, Kitab al-Ghayba, p. 107)

            “Imam Mahdi will bring new Sharia (divine law) and commandments.” (Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 10, p. 597)

            “Al-Qa’im (Imam Mahdi) will bring a new teaching, a new book and a new law.” (Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 354 )

            12. Shia’s Mahdi will declare himself to be a prophet

            Imam Mahdi will declare himself to be a prophet. (Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 10, p. 550)

            13. All angels will swear allegiance to Shia’s Mahdi

            All angels will swear allegiance to Imam Mahdi. (Syed Najmul Hasan, Chodah Sitaray, p. 594)

            14. Shia believe Prophet Mohammad (p) will return and be the first person to pledge of allegiance to Shia’s Imam Mahdi

            The first disciple to take a pledge of allegiance (bay’a) to him will be Prophet Mohammad ( Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 348)

            The Shia believe Prophet Mohammad (p) and many of the early Muslims will come back to life at the End Times and they call this “Raj’ah” meaning the “Return”.

            15. Shia’s Mahdi was born before God created human beings

            مهدي الشيعة خلق قبل خلق الخلق (بحار الأنوار 51/144)

            According to Al-Majlisi’s Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 51, page 144, Shia’s Mahdi was born before God created human beings.

            16. Mahdi’s Shia does not have a shadow

            مهدي الشيعة ليس له ظل (بحار الأنوار 52/322)

            According to Al-Majlisi’s Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, page 322, Al-Mahdi does not a shadow.

            17. Mentioning the name of the Shia’s Mahdi is not permissible

            مهدي الشيعة لا يحل ذكر اسمه ومن سماه ملعون (بحار الأنوار 51/33)

            According to Al-Majlisi’s Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 51, page 33, it is not permissible to mention the name of the Shia’s Mahdi and whoever refers to him by his name shall be cursed.

            18. Shia’s Mahdi will Rule according to the Law of David

            محمد بن أحمد عن محمد بن خـالد عن النَضر بن سويد عن يحي الحلبي عن عمران بن أعين عن جعيد الهمداني عن عليَ بن الحـسين عليه السَلام قال:

            روح القُدُس به تلقَانا شيء فإن أعيانا بحكم آل داود، قال سألته بأي حكم تحكمون ؟

            Muhammad ibn Ahmad attributes to Jaeed al Hamdani asking Ali ibn Al-Hussein [a.s.] (Shia’s 4th Imams): “I asked him by which law will you (the 12 Imams) rule?” Ali ibn Al-Hussein [as]: said: “By the ruling (law) of the family of David, and if we encounter something perplexing, Ruh Al- Quds ( Holy Spirit, meaning Angel Gabriel ) will solve it for us.” ( Al-Kulayni , Al-Kafi, Vol. 1, p. 397)

            … جعفر عليه السلام: عن أبي عبيد الحذَاء قال

            قال يا أبا عبيدة إذا قام قائم آل محمد عليه السلام حكم بحكم داود وسليمان ولا يُسأل بيننة

            Abu Obeida Al-Hazza attributed to Imam Abu Abdullah [a.s.] (Shia’s 6th Imam) saying: “O Abu Obeida when Qa’im (Imam Mahdi) of the House of Muhammad (s.a.w.) rises up, he will rule according to the law of David and Solomon and he will not be asked for evidence.” (Al-Kulayni, Usul Al-Kafi, Vol. 1, p. 397 , Al-Mufeed Al-Tusi, Al-Irshad, p. 413, and Alam Al-Wara, p. 433 )

            Note what this narration says, “he will not be asked for evidence.” Islam emphasizes that in order to make a fair judgment, you need to rely on evidence. So, Imam Mahdi will break that rule of fairness. In other words, the Mahdi is above the laws of Islam. He will not follow the Quran, but rather he will follow Jewish laws.

            19. The source of Shia’s knowledge is from the Israelites, most probably, the Talmud

            The Imam (a.s.) remained silent for a while and then said, “(Held) With us, there is Al-Jifr (the parchment). Do you know what Al-Jifr is?” I then asked, “What is Al-Jifr ?” The Imams (a.s.) said, “It is a container made of leather that contains knowledge of the prophets and the executors of their wills and theknowledge of the scholars of the past from the Israelites.” (Al-Kulayni, Al-Kafi, Vol. 1, Chapter 40, p. 635)

            20. Shia’s Mahdi will call God by God’s Hebrew name

            العبراني دعا الله باسمه إذا أذَن الإمام : للنعماني الغيبة في كتاب

            Al-Mufadhal ibn Umar is reported to have said that Abu Abdullah [a.s.] (Shia’s 6th Imams) said: “When the Imam (Mahdi) makes a call (for prayer), he will supplicate to God using God’s Hebrew name…” (Al-Numani, Al-Ghayba , p.326)

            21. When Shia’s Imam Mahdi appears, Shia’s Taqiyyah will be annulled

            Taqiyyah is something compulsory to be practiced by one who is following the Shiism.

            In a narration attributed to the 8th Shia Imam, Ali bin Musa, he said,“ The one who is not wari (pious) has no religion and the one who does not practice Taqiyyah has no Iman ( deep faith).” So he was asked, “O grandson of the Messenger, until when (is one required to practice Taqiyyah)?” He replied, “Until a certain day (i.e. the day Imam Mahdi appears). Whoever does not practice Taqiyyah before the appearance of Imam Mahdi, is not one of us.” (Al-Ardabili, Kashf al-Ghummah , p. 341).

            22. At the time of Shia’s Mahdi, people will rise from the dead

            وروى العاملي عن المفضل بن عمر قال : ذكرنا القائم عليه السلام ومن مات ينتظره من أصحابنا فقال لنا أبو عبدالله عليه السلام : إذا قام أتى المؤمن في قبره فيقال له : يا هذا إنه قد ظهر صاحبك فإن شئت تلحق به فالحق وإن تشأ تقيم في كرامة ربك فأقم

            In a narration attributed to Imam Abu Abdullah, he said: ” When he (Imam Mahdi) rises, he will come to the believer (meaning a Shia) in his grave. The dead believer will asked: ‘ O you, your friend (Imam Mahdi) has emerged. If you wish to follow him, follow him. However, if you wish to stay in the dignity (or honored status) provided by your Lord, you may stay ‘.” (Baha’ Din Al-Amili)

            23. Imam Mahdi recited the Sura Al-Qadr (Chapter 97 of Quran) before his birth. (Jalau Al-Uyoun, Vol. 2, p. 475)

            24. The Sun will rise from the West at the time of Imam Mahdi’s appearance. (Syed Najmul Hasan, Chodah Sitaray, p. 585)

            25. Imam Mahdi will appear when only forty two believing Shia will be left on the face of the Earth. (Syed Najmul Hasan, Chodah Sitaray, p. 571)

            Other Characteristics of Shia Mahdi from Shiite’s Books and Sources:

            1) The Mahdi of Shia is supernatural being

            Shia Mehdi: Supernatural being with powers alive for 1200 years.(“The Imams know when they will die, and they do not die except by their own choice.” (Al-Kafi)

            2) Shia Mahdi will have Supernatural Powers and will have the power to resurrect

            a) “By listening to the voice of a person, the Imams can tell if the person was destined to go to hell or to heaven; they would thus answer his questions accordingly.” (Usool Al-Kafi.)

            b)“The Imams possess all the knowledge granted to the angels, Prophets and Messengers.” (Al- Kulaini, Al-Kafi)

            c) Mullah Baqir Majlisi writes in Haqqul Yaqeen: “When Imam Mahdi arrives, Aisha will be resurrected so that she may be given a prescribed punishment and that Fatima be vindicated.” (Haqqul Yaqeen: 347) see how they curse Ummu Aisha (RA), you still say they are Muslims?

            d) Here we go with another Shia text. The shia also pray (astaghfirullah) that they ressurect Abu Bakr (RA) and Umar (RA) and punish them. Look at their believes about sahaba, He, the Mahdi, will first dig the grave of Abu Bakr (RA) and Umar (RA),then hang them on a stake He will remove the body of Ayesha (RA) and implement the same punished for Zina. He will then kill the Sunni Scholars. Punish the Muslim Ummah. First kill Ahle – Sunnah, then Ulema, then Kuffar , thats what even the dajjal would do. (Al Kafi, Al Kulaini and Usool ul Kafi)

            3) Mahdi of the Rawafidees will rule according to the Laws of David and the family of David.

            (Al-Kulaini reports in his work al-Kafi, volume no.1, p.397-398)

            a) Narrated Ali ibn Ibraheem -from his father-from ibn Abi Umair-from Mansour-from Fadhl al Aour- from Abi Ubaidah who reported: “During the times of Imam Jaffar[as] we used to go around like herds without a caretaker. We met with Salim ibn Abi Hafs who asked me: ”Oh Abu Ubaidullah, who is your Imam?” I replied:” My Imams are from the household of the prophet”. He then stated: “You have perished and so have I for both of us have heared Abu Jafar[as] saying: “One who dies without recognizing his Imam, he dies a death of Jahiliyyah.” Then I affirmed what he said. It was before that three or somewhat close to it(time span) when I entered upon Abu Abdullah[as] and God granted me knowledge. Then I said to Abu Abdullah[as]: “Salim said such and such.” He replied: “Oh Abu Obaidah nobody here will die until he is succeeded by some one who does the same thing as his, and adopts the similar manners of his predecessor, and calls to the same thing as his predecessor did. Oh Abu Ubaidah, it was permitted that whatever was given to David was also provided for Sulaiman.” Then he added: “Oh Abu Ubaidah when the Qaem of the household of the prophet appears, he will rule according to rule of David and Solomon.”

            b) Muhammad ibn Yahya-Ahmad ibn Muhammad- Muhammad ibn Sinaan-Abaan who reported: “I heard Abu Abdullah[as] saying: “The world will not fade away unless a person from us appears who will rule according to the rule of the family of David and he will not ask his house. He will give every one his right.

            c) Ahmad-Ahmad ibn Muhammad-Ibn Mahboob-Hisham ibn Salim-Ammar as Saabati who reported: “I asked Abu Abdullah [as] : “On what will you rule if you are made the rulers.” He replied: “By the rule of Allah and the rule of David. And if we are confronted by a situation which we cannot solve, Gabriel (Ruh al Quds) will reveal it to us.”

            d) Muhammad ibn Ahmad-Muhammad ibn Khalid-Nazr ibn Suwaid-Yahya al Halabi-Imran ibn Oueiyn-Jaeed al Hamdani–Ali ibn al-Hussein[as] said: “I asked him by which law will you rule?” He said: “By the rule of David, and if there is something which we are unaware of, Gabriel(Ruh al Quds) will reveal it to us.”

            e) Ahmad ibn Mahran[ra]-Muhammad ibn Ali-Ibn Mahboob–Hishaam bin Salim-Ammar as Saabati reported: I asked Imam Abu Abdullah[as] :“What is the status of the Aimmah.” He replied : “It is similar to the status of Dhul Qarnain, Ushegh, and Asef the companion of prophet Sulaiman.” Then I asked: “By what will you rule?” He replied: “By the rule of God, by the rule of David, and by the rule of the Prophet Muhammad[saw] and by the revealation of Gabriel.

            4) Mahdi Al-Muntazar will speak in Hebrew.

            Reported to us Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Saeed al Uqdah who said: Narrated to us Ali ibn al-Hasan at- Taymali who said: narrated to us al-Hasan and Muhammad the sons of Ali ibnu Yusuf, from Sa’daan ibnu Muslim, from rajaal, from alMufadhaal ibn Umar who said: Abu Abdullah[as] reported: “When the Imam Mahdi calls out, he will supplicate to God in Hebrew.”[ Shiite source: Al-Ghaybaa of an Numani, p.326]

            Lets see the evidence from the Quran revealing the connection between the Shia and the Anti-Christ:

            The following 2 consecutive verses 158- 159 of Sura Al-Anaam (Chapter 6) provide additional clear evidence that connects the Shia to the Dajjal (Anti-Christ):

            158. هَلْ يَنظُرُونَ إِلاَّ أَن تَأْتِيهُمُ الْمَلَآئِكَةُ أَوْ يَأْتِيَ رَبُّكَ أَوْ يَأْتِيَ بَعْضُ آيَاتِ رَبِّكَ يَوْمَ يَأْتِي بَعْضُ آيَاتِ رَبِّكَ لاَ يَنفَعُ نَفْسًا إِيمَانُهَا لَمْ تَكُنْ آمَنَتْ مِن قَبْلُ أَوْ كَسَبَتْ فِي إِيمَانِهَا خَيْرًا قُلِ انتَظِرُواْ إِنَّا مُنتَظِرُونَ158. They are just waiting for the angels (of torment) to reach them, or your Lord to come (Himself), or some (exclusive) Signs of your Lord to come (perceptibly. Tell them:) ‘The Day when some Signs of your Lord will come (in such an evident way, then accepting) the belief will not benefit someone who had not believed before, or did not earn any good (in the state of) having believed.’ Say: ‘Wait; we (too) are waiting.’159. إِنَّ الَّذِينَ فَرَّقُواْ دِينَهُمْ وَكَانُواْ شِيَعًا لَّسْتَ مِنْهُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ إِنَّمَا أَمْرُهُمْ إِلَى اللّهِ ثُمَّ يُنَبِّئُهُم بِمَا كَانُواْ يَفْعَلُونَ159. Those who have caused schism (splitting or division) in their religion and they have become Shia (sects or groups), you (Prophet Mohammad صلى الله عليه وسلم ) are not one of them in any way. Their case (for judgment & punishment) is up to Allah. Then, He (Allah) will tell (confront) them about what they used to do.

            Verse 158 of Chapter 6 is telling us that once Certain Signs of God occur, believing in God will no longer benefit because God will no longer accept repentance.

            The following Hadith specifies these Certain Signs. One of these signs is the Dajjal (Anti-Christ):

            ثلاث إذا خرجن لم ينفع { نفسا إيمانها لم تكن آمنت من قبل } الآية الدجال ، والدابة ، وطلوع الشمس من المغرب – أو من مغربها
            الراوي: أبو هريرة المحدث: الألباني – المصدر: صحيح الترمذي

            Abu Huraira said: “Three things that once they occur, the soul will not benefit from believing (in God) if it did not believe before … (verse 6:158): the Dajjal (Anti-Christ), Daabba (Beast), and Sun rise from the West.” (Tirmizi and Al-Albani)

            So, we have verse 158 that refers indirectly to the Dajjal and the next verse 159 warns us about the Shia. It seems that God is making in these verse a connection between the Shia and the Anti-Christ.

            Lets examine if Shia’s Imam Mahdi could be the Dajjal (Anti-Christ):

            The Shia are waiting for their Twelfth Imam, sometimes referred to as Imam Mahdi (Mehdi) or Qaem, to appear. The evidence suggests that the person that the Shia will take as their Twelfth Imam could be the Dajjal (the Anti-Christ).

            Jewish Law

            The “Qaem” (Imam Mahdi) of the Shia will rule according to the Laws of David and the family of David, according to the Shia narrations they attribute to their Imams in Al-Kafi, the book most relied upon by Shia scholars out of the four Shia Hadith books.

            All of the following Shia narrations come from the same section in Al-Kafi reported by Al-Kulyani, located in Al-Kafi (Volume 1, p. 387-398):

            1. Ali ibn Ibrahim attributes to Abi Ubaidah saying: “When the Qaem (Imam Mahdi) of the household of the Prophet appears, he will rule according to the ruling (law) of David and Solomon.”

            2. محمَد ين يحي عن أحمد بن محمَد عن محمد بن سنان عن أبان قال : سمعت أبا عبد الله عليه السلام يقول : << لا تذهب الدنيا حتى يخرج رجل مني يحكم بحكومة آل داود ولا يُسأل بيّنة ، يعطي كل نفس حقها.

            Muhammad ibn Yahya attributes to Muhammad ibn Sinan- Abaan saying: “I heard Abu Abdullah [as] (one of Shia's 12 Imams) saying: "The World will not fade away unless a person from us appears who will rule according to the ruling (law) of the family of David.”

            3. محمد عن أحمد بن محمد عن ابن محبوب عن هشام بن سالم عن عمَار الساباطي قال : قلت لأبي عبد الله عليه السَلام : بما تحكمون إذا حكمتم قال << بحكم الله وحكم داود ، فإذا ورد علينا الشَيء الذي ليس عندنا تلقَانا به روح القُدُس .

            Ahmad ibn Muhammad attributes to Ammar AsSaabati saying: “I asked Abu Abdullah [as] (one of Shia's 12 Imams): "On what will you (the 12 Imams) rule if you are made the rulers." He replied: "By the ruling of God and the ruling (law) of David. And if we are confronted by a situation which we cannot solve, Gabriel (Ruh al Quds – Holy Spirit) will reveal it to us.”

            4. محمد بن أحمد عن محمد بن خـالد عن النَضر بن سويد عن يحي الحلبي عن عمران بن أعين عن جعيد الهمداني عن عليَ بن الحـسين عليه السَلام قال: سألته بأي حكم تحكمون ؟ قال << بحكم آل داود، فإن أعيانا شيء تلقَانا به روح القُدُس .

            Muhammad ibn Ahmad attributes to Jaeed al Hamdani asking Ali ibn Al-Hussein [as] (one of Shia's 12 Imams): “I asked him by which law will you rule?” Ali ibn al-Hussein [as]: said: “By the ruling (law) of David, and if there is something which we are unaware of, Gabriel (Ruh al Quds- Holy Spirit) will reveal it to us.”

            5. اًحمد بن مهران رحمه الله عن محمَد بن علىَ عن ابن محبوب عن هشام ين سالم عن عمَار السَاباطي قال قلت لأبي عبد الله عليه السلام : ما منزلة الأئمَة ؟ قال"كمنزلة ذي القرنين وكمنزلة يوشع وكمنزلة آصف صاحب سليمان." قلت : فبما تحكمون ؟ قال : " بحكم الله وآل داود وحكم محمَد صلى الله عليه وسلم ولتلقَانا به روح القُدُس".

            Ahmad ibn Mahran attributes to Ammar AsSaabati saying: “I asked Abu Abdullah [as] (one of Shia's 12 Imams): …‘By how will you rule?’ Abu Abdullah [as] replied: ‘By the rule of God, and by the ruling (law) of David.”

            Supplicate to God using God's Hebrew name

            في كتاب (الغيبة) للنعماني : <>

            Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Saeed al Uqdah attributes to al-Mufadhal ibn Umar saying that Abu Abdullah [as] said: “When the Imam Mahdi makes a call (for prayer), he will supplicate to God using God’s Hebrew name and then his three hundred thirteen friends (followers) will rush to him…” (AnNumani, Al-Ghayba , p.326)

            Jews & prominent Prophets will be among the Followers of the Mahdi

            According to the Shia, the Jews will also be among the followers of Imam Mahdi (Mehdi):

            روى الشَيخ المفيد في (الإرشاد ، عن المفضّل بن عمر عن أبي عبد الله قال <> . الإرشاد للمفيد الطوسي ص402 .

            Sheikh al-Mufeed has reported in his Al-Irshaad based on al-Mufadhaal ibnu Umar that Imam Abu Abdullah [as] said: “ Twenty seven men from the people of Moses, seven from Ahl Al-Kahf (People of the Cave), (prophet) Joshua bin Nun, (prophet) Solomon, Abu Dajana Al-Ansari, Al-Miqdad, Malik Al-Ahtar will come out with the Mahdi and be his supporters.” (Al-Mufeed Al-Tusi, Al-Irshaad p.402)

            Jewish Books

            According to a Shia narration in Al-Kafi, the Imam Mahdi learns from Al-Jafr, which contains the knowledge from the Israelites:

            The Imam (a.s.) remained silent for a while and then said, “(Held) With us, there is Al-Jafr (the parchment). Do they know what Al-Jafr is?” I then asked, “What is Al-Jafr ?” The Imams (a.s.) said, “It is a container made of leather that contains knowledge of the prophets and the executors of their wills and theknowledge of the scholars of the past from the Israelites.” (al-Kafi, Vol. 1, Chapter 40, p. 635)

            Zionist Jews Messiahs and Christians Witnesses:

            Some of the Jews are expecting two Messiahs for them in the End Times. They refer to first Messiah as Son of Joseph and the second Messiah as Son of David.

            Christians are expecting 2 Witnesses in the End Times. They tend to expect one of the witnesses to be Elijah.

            The first Dajjal Messiah, in the End Times, will probably falsely claim to be Son of Joseph of the Jews and Elijah of the Christians. He may claim to also be paving the way for Shia’s Mahdi, if no Shia person emerges. However, it is more likely that a Shia person (such as President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadi Nejjad) will emerge and claim to be paving the way for the Mahdi. The Shia have many narrations about individuals whom they expect to appear and pave the way for Shia’s Mahdi. Most likely, there will NOT be anyone in the beginning of the End Times who will claim to be Shia’s Imam Mahdi, but only claim to be paving the way for Shia’s Imam Mahdi.

            The first Dajjal Messiah will probably NOT claim to be God. Whereas the last Dajjal, son of David, is likely to claim to be God.

            The last Dajjal may also claim to be Shia’s Imam Mahdi.

            In a way, God uses the Dajjal to mock and test the followers of false/corrupted religions of Judaism, Christianity and Shiism:

            (a) Zionist Christians will be following the Anti-Christ, as if he is God, while he will be committing evil things. God will be laughing at them. Jesus in his first life was a good man and prophet, and never claimed to be God. They corrupted the Gospel by making Jesus into a a human God. Now, God is punishing them for this major sin by having Christians face the prospect of following the Anti-Christ, who is an evil man, thinking that he is Jesus/God.

            (b) The Jewish and Shia books portray their Messiah/ Mahdi as someone who does evil things to their enemies. God will be testing the Jews and Shia to see to what extent they are willing to accept the evil-doings of the Anti-Christ who will be acting as their Messiah/Mahdi.

            Faithful Sunni Muslims are less susceptible to be tempted or deceived by the Anti-Christ.

            Conclusions

            All of these narrations from Shia’s books lead us to believe that the Shia’s 12th Imam is actually the Dajjal (Anti-Christ) that the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) warned us about, who would mislead many and create destruction on Earth. This is man who the Shia are waiting for.

            According to the evidence, this is what we know about the Shia’s “Qaem/ Imam Mahdi ”:

            1. Shia’s Imam Mahdi will rule according to the laws of the family line of prophet David, using the Talmud.

            2. Shia’s Imam Mahdi will use Hebrew language in his prayers .

            3. Jews will be among the followers of Shia’s Imam Mahdi (Mehdi).

            4. Shia’s Imam Mahdi learns from the Talmud which is contained in the “Jafr.”

          • wargame1

            I am asking you to prove the wrong teaching which you claim you know. So prove it

          • zabada

            God is superior than me.Ask him to find the very solid truth.Peace.

          • wargame1

            Stupid bitch you then stop your teaching of deception. You dont have the answer

          • wargame1

            WHY THE SHITS AND THE SHIT EATING SUFI TRY TO POINT THEIR FINGER TO SAUDI ARABIA AS NAJD???
            A hadeeth which has been (deliberately) misunderstood by certain groups of people in order that they may spread their misguidance and deceive ignorant Muslims. I am going to punish you with truth now

          • wargame1

            Based upon research and investigation and looking to the words of our early scholars we find that the hadeeth does not refer to the Najd that is famously known in Saudi today, but rather it refers to Iraaq. So we need to combine all hadis to find the Najd among the 13 Najd in different places. So I am going to expose the Shits and the Sufis for their dirty strategy

          • wargame1

            You need to bring the proof against Muhammad Ibn Wahab. You dont need to bring the whole thing, Just bring any single teaching of him contradicts with Quran and Sunnah. You know that you cant prove it. So stop proving yourself as a liar. You cant stand him because of your Shit and sufi belief.

          • wargame1

            Prove from the hadis that Najd is supposedly in Saudi Arabia. If you claim without evidence then its not valid

          • wargame1

            If I google wahabi then there are hundreds of article written against them by the Shit eating sufis and Shias but there is no reference. You also cant bring any reference. If you do bring any reference of his teaching then that will be the same of the teaching of the prophet because Muhammad Ibn Wahab was a great sunni Scholar and he was a hafiz of the Quran and his teaching never contradicts with the sunnah nor with the Quran. Now bring some reference to prove your claim you liar

          • zabada

            read all side..act you are a judge..a judge must hear to both side..to find the truth.Don,t forget to ask god to guide you.

          • wargame1

            I wound not waste my time reading garbage written by the French ,Shits and the Sufis. I read Quran and Hadis and I have read some teaching about Muhammad Abdul Wahab and didnt find it going against the teaching of the prophet and the Quran.

          • wargame1

            Tell me some of the teaching of Muhammad Ibn Wahab and we will compare them with Quran and hadis. Bring it on you liar

        • wargame1

          America is lured in to destroy Iraq by the Iranian Majoos. Iran is more responsible in killing sunnis.

          • zabada

            you not understand.they are not.It is Zionist movement who did that..Syiah also in their list to be kill.

          • wargame1

            No Muslim will ever make unity with those Shits who slander the wives of the prophet and the mother of the believer. Those who advocate the Shia sunni Unity are inspired by Shaitan.If the Zionist kill Shits then thats their problem.

          • zabada

            Even Christian will convert when Jesus..isa pbuh appear in damascus..I guess Syiah will convert at the same times. When Dajjal see Jesus..he melt down..as salt meat in water..means ..they will convert to islam..assimilate them selves to muslims..you are not acknowledge..now 40% sunni already in Iran..they are convert from Syiah.Syiah and sunni in Iran not killing each others..if there are western boots in Iran..I guess Syiah and sunni will fight each others.At the times of saddam syaih and sunni live peacefully..may be they are hating each others,but not like you see in Iraq now,after America invasion.America plant Jews conspiracy in Iraq..to kill both syiah and sunni..both are great enemies to Israelis jews.Jews not let them to unite,for israel survival.

          • wargame1

            Dajjal will be killed by Jesus (peace be upon him)
            You have start your nonsense again….Look what you write
            “When Dajjal see Jesus..he melt down..as salt meat in water..means ..they will convert to islam.”

            Who told you this meaning? Are you on Drugs?

          • zabada

            i guess its..how some one will kill an object that melting down?.

          • wargame1

            Instead of guessing just read those hadis which says everything clearly. Why do you have to guess when there are clear explanation? By guessing like a drunk you confuse yourself and others

          • zabada

            khah..khah..khah..some of dajjal will convert to Islam..that why they are going to melting down..some who are advocate zionist and fight for Israel and not turn back will be kill.That why it is two opposite verses..Dajjal will melting down when he see Jesus..and another verses Isa pbuh will kill Dajjal..It is make sense..brother.All christian pay great respect to jesus..that why when the saw Jesus sided muslim..they will follow him..that is the meaanig Dajjal will melting down…Dajjal is western Christians people..ahli kitab..people of books…open your mind.

          • wargame1

            Dajjal will melt like the salt melt when he See Jesus (Peace be upon him) and Jesus will then chase him through mount afiq and finally he will capture him in lood i.e. a place in Israel near bengorian Airport. So that melting thing doesnt mean that he will convert. Khabish like you make story out of nothing.

          • zabada

            khah..khah..khah.I win.

          • zabada

            he chase another Dajjal..who are still sided Jews,Israel.He will not kill who turn to Islam.it is illegal,Haram.

          • wargame1

            Prove your claim from the hadis. Show us that one Dajjal melts and thats conversion according to you and then another one which is killed. Can you prove it from hadis?

          • zabada

            even now ..many Christians in the west convert to islam..when they saw Jesus..most of them will convert.Most of them are not cruel people..Paulus a Jew who delude them badly.When they saw the truth they will left Christianity behind.

          • wargame1

            We do not know how and who will convert but we know that upon the returning of Jesus (Peace be upon him) there will be no confusion among the Jews and the Christians about his prophethood and his miraculous birth etc. So it is presumed that the Jews and the Christians will accept him as prophet.

          • wargame1

            You sufis have been conspiring against the Saudi government in favor of Iran and those grave worshiping shit eating sufis. So first you called them wahabi but you cant prove anything and then you identify najd in Saudi Arabia but that is nonsense because Najd in the hadis is in Iraq

          • wargame1

            Iran was a sunni majority country in the past. Then the rafida started to kill many sunnis and their scholars and now there is NOT a Single Sunni Mosque allowed in Tehran. If you talk about living in peace then all other religion such as Jews Christians Druze Yazidi and others etc are also need to live in peace. Since you support the Daesh Dogs who have been invading the Kurdish land and driving out the Christians and Yazidis and with the same breath you are advocating peace!! what a Hypocrite.

          • zabada

            Too many pluralism at the area.If you are going to claim you are Mahdi..I guess to can unite them…All of them are waiting for almahdi now.Oh why many people called isis..daesh..what its means ?.

          • wargame1

            Hey you mutta son of a bitch do you need some bitch slap ? Why do you put your dirty word in my mouth ? Did I ever say anything like claiming Mahdi? You dont have any valid argument so you have starting nonsense. You Shit eating sufis guess too much like Imaran Hossein who used to fool many with his guess work and now he only have Shia and Sufi fan and the sunnis throw him in to the loony Bin. Talk rationally and provide sound information. Dajjal is melting doesnt mean he is converting asshole

          • zabada

            khah…khah..khah..unfortunately..your hand can,t reach me.I guess you will not punch out your computer.You have strong word..but you can,t swim deeply as religious person.I m not syiah..i m pure sunni..I guess you are pure wahabi..It is some wahabis in my country..we debate on them..but they are not going to hear..they are dumb.You are nooot.Ofcourse you are not.

          • wargame1

            Why dont you bring some reference from the wahabi teaching? Didnt he aske you not to worship grave? do you like Hu Hu Zikr? No Sahaba nor the prophet ever did that Hu Ha zikr like you shit eating sufi

        • wargame1

          Read the Shia hate preach against the sunnis in their holy book. Please note that they use the term “Nasib” to identify the sunnis. NOW read
          “ When Qa’im (Shia refer to their 12 Imam as Al-Qa’im) appears, they (the Shia) will bring every Nasib (a term used by Shia to refer to Sunnis) to him (Shia’s Mahdi). If he (the Nasib) accepts Islam, and it is recognition of Al-Wilaya (meaning Imam Ali is Representative of God), he will be freed; otherwise his head will be cut off. Alternatively, if he accepts jizyah (penalty tax), he will be required to pay as a Zhimmi (Zhimmi is a status given by Islam to Christians & Jews).. ( Baqir Al-Majlisi’s Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, page 373 and Furat ibn Ibrahim’s Tafseer , page 100)

        • wargame1

          According to Shia’s book, Baqir Al-Majlisi’s Haq Al-Yaqeen, page 527, their hidden 12 Imam will kill all Sunni Scholars:
          “They (Sunnis) may marry from us and inherit from us until the Mahdi (Shia 12 Imam) emerges. He starts by killing the scholars of the Sunnis and then ordinary Sunnis.” (Baqir Al-Majlisi’s Haq Al-Yaqeen)

        • wargame1

          According to Shia’s book, Al-Kulaini’s Al-Rawdah min al-Kafi, Vol. 8, page 160, the Sunnis who do not accept his teachings of Shiism will be beheaded.

        • wargame1

          The Shias are programmed to kill the Muslims in their holy book. Here is one of many such reference
          Sayid Sadr states: “Indeed, most the killings (by their 12 Imam & his followers) that happen to mankind will be directed against the Muslims. Then, he (Shia’s 12 Imam) will distribute a copy of his book (a new scripture, not the current Quran)…” (Sayyid Husein Al-Musawi, Li Allah Thumma Li Tarikh, p.137)
          ——————-
          These are made up prophesy to brainwash the Shias to hate the sunnis.

        • wargame1

          If you differ with Shia religion then you will be a target according to their teaching. READ
          “For those in our (Shia’s) State who differ with us, there is a punishment. God has made their blood Halal (permissible to be shed) when our Qa’im (Shia’s Mahdi) emerges.”( Baqir Al-Majlisi’s Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 50, p. 373)
          ——————–Ever wonder from where those Daesh dogs get their killing/Beheading inspiration???

        • wargame1

          The Shia preach to their people that they can rob the sunnis
          “ The money of the Al-Nasib (the Sunni) is Halal (permissible to be stolen) and every thing he owns is Halal.” ( Al-Tusi, Tahzeeb Al-Ahkam, Vol. 2, p. 48 and Al-Hur Al-Amili, Wasil Al-Shia, Vol. 11, p.60)

        • wargame1

          See how the shia preachers send their thugs to rob the sunnis and share with the shia preachers
          “Take the money (meaning by stealing or rip-off) of Al-Nasib (the Sunni) wherever you find it and pay to us Al-Khums (one fifth of the money).” (Al-Tusi, Tahzeeb Al-Ahkam, Vol. 1, p. 384, Ibn Idriss, Al-Sarair p. 484, and Al-Hur Al-Amili, Wasil Al-Shia, Vol. 340, p.6)

          • zabada

            what is al Khum?.

          • wargame1

            one fifth of the money

          • zabada

            ulemas of money…mut,ah..how happy there were.

        • wargame1

          Look how the shia preach hate against the Arabs
          “There will be nothing left between us and the Arabs, except slaughter.” (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 349 and Al-Numani, Al-Ghaiba, p. 155)

          • zabada

            it is political doctrines,not religion.Otherwise Syiah eyeing this as their religion.Hence their religion not only religion of hates,but religion of killing.

        • wargame1

          The Shias have been killing the sunnis and the same plan is still on. READ
          “Al-Muntazar (the Awaited One, meaning Shia’s 12 Imam) will walk amongst the Arabs and kill them.” (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 318)

        • wargame1

          Look how the Shia religion preach racism
          “Fear the Arabs because there will be very bad news for them, which is that none from amongst them will come out with Al-Qa’im (Shia’s 12 Imam).” (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 333, and Al-Numani, Al-Ghaiba, p. 254)

        • wargame1

          Why the Daeshbags want to destroy the Kaba in Mecca? Its in the Shia holy book. Look here
          “Al-Qaim (Shia’s Mahdi) will demolish Haram Mosque (in Mecca) down to its foundation and the Messenger’s Mosque (Prophet Mohammad’s s.a.w. Mosque in Medina) down to its foundation.” (Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, vol. 52, p. 338, and Al-Tusi, Al-Ghaibah, p. 282)

        • wargame1

          The Shias believe about a creature hiding in a cave they call him 12 Imam. They also call him Mehdi in order to fool the sunnis. Now this creature will supposedly destroy the Kaaba!! Do you recall that the Daeshbags also want to destroy the Kaaba??? Here is a reference
          “When Imam Mahdi rises up, he will demolish Al-Haram Mosque ( in Mecca) …’” (Al-Mufid, Al-Irshad. p. 411 and At-Tusi, Kitab al Ghaibah, p. 282)

        • wargame1

          |The Shias are more dangerous than the Jews. Look what they preach against the companion of the prophet and look at their desire to destroy the Kaaba.
          “Do you know what the Qa’im (Shia’s 12 imam) will start with? What he will start with is that he will dig up/out the graves of these two (Abu Bakr al-Siddiq r.a. and Umar bin al-Khattab r.a., Prophet Mohammad’s companions and successors as Caliphs) while they are still wet and fresh and burn/cremate them and throw them (their ashes) into the wind. And he will break/destroy the Mosque (meaning the holy Al-Haram Mosque of Mecca).” (Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 386)

          • zabada

            Syiits are weird people with weird believe.They are nothing to do with me.

          • Watchdog

            I read you posts..You are very confused..You blame Isreal for every thing . Stop believing in fairy tales…Israel wants peace you don’t want Israel there no matter what they do ..they gave you Gaza ..you thanked them by firing 500 rockets every day..Keep pushing and they will be forced to fire 5000 nukes in the middle east…..

          • wargame1

            The Israelis need to deal with the Arabs. At this time its Iran who invaded Lebanon and Palestine. So you are dealing with fraud

        • wargame1

          You bring America to hide the Iranian/Russian crime against the sunnis. Hey you liar where do you learn that Sunnis killed Hussain? Its the Shias who killed Hussain and thats why they have been crawling like cockroaches towards the grave of Hossain. Why do they cut their heads and boby and call ya Hussain ? Because they are the guilty who killed Hussain. Do not blame the sunnis.

        • wargame1

          When it is well established that the Shias killed Hussain then you Liar is accusing the sunnis for this crime. Now you need to listen the truth from some of the Shias and clear your head from deception. This is a Youtube video where you will learn that its the Shias who killed Hussain from both Shia and sunni scholar. Watch it and stop your deception
          /watch?v=eOR1NYTXwjg

        • wargame1

          The Shia of Kufah Deceived, Deserted, Ambushed and Murdered the Grandson of the Prophet Al-Husayn, His Brothers and His Children and Took Their Women as Captives

          • zabada

            it is Yazid armies who took them as captives..they are bad sunni.Syiah left Ali with only 73 man to fight Yazid armies in karbala.Both side is responsible on Hussain killing.Otherwise Syiah can,t take advantage on this to hate sunni and killing them and rob their land or politic and divided muslims badly.It the past incident.All of us feel so sorry on that killing,not oly Syiah.

          • wargame1

            I gave you the refeence from the Shia historian who also acknowledge that the Shias killed Al-Hussain. The Sunni Scholars know it too. But those wicked Shias and some wicked sufis like to blame the sunnis and make some false claim.

        • wargame1

          The following quotes are all from Shia authorities regarding the Murder of Hussain by the shias. The advice of Muhammad bin al-Hanafiyyah, the brother of al-Husayn, who said to al-Husayn:
          “O my brother, you already know the treachery of the people of Kufah towards your father and brother. And I fear that your affair will be the same as that of he who has already passed.” [al-Malhoof of Ibn Tawoos (p. 39), Aashooraa of al-Ihsaa’ee (p. 115), al-Majaalis al-Faakhirah of Abd al-Husayn (p. 75), Muntahaa al-Aamaal of Abbaas al-Qummee (1/454).]

          Today the Same Khawarij Daesh and Iranian regime have join their hand against the sunnis

        • wargame1

          The saying of al-Husayn about the Shia of Kufah (Coming from the Shia history book
          “O Allaah, judge between us and between a people who requested us to aid us, but who then killed us.” [Muntahaa al-Aamaal of Abbaas al-Qummee (1/535)]

          Stop your deception against the sunnis.

        • wargame1

          The Shia writer, Husayn al-Kawraani writes regarding the Shia treachery against Al-Hussain.
          “The people of Kufah did not suffice with splitting from al-Imaam al-Husayn, but the result of their changing their colours led to a third position which is that they began to prepare to depart to Karbalah in order to wage war against al-Imaam al-Husayn (alayhis salaam). And in Karbala they would hasten (racing each other) to take up their positions, those which pleased Shaytan and which anger al-Rahmaan (Allaah). For example we find that Amr bin al-Hajjaaj who only yesterday was prominent in Kufah as if he was the guardian of the sanctuary of Ahl al-Bayt, and a defender of them, and the one who led an army to save Haani bin Urwah, went on to stomach (gulped) all of his apparent position(s) in order to accuse al-Imam al-Husayn of exiting from the religion, let us reflect upon the following text: “And Amr bin al-Hajjaaj used to say to his companions, ‘Fight the one who exited from the religion and separated from the jamaa’ah (meaning al-Husayn)…’.” Fee Rihaab al-Karbalaa (pp. 60-61)

        • wargame1

          Shia historian al-Kawraani writes regarding the shia back stabbing to hussain:
          “And we find another stance indicating the hypocrisy of the people of Kufah, Abd Allaah bin Hawzah al-Tameemi came in front of al-Imaam al-Husayn (alayhis salaam) and shouted, “Is Husayn amongst you?” Yet he was from the people of Kufah and only yesterday was he from the Shia (party) of Alee (alayhis salaam) and it is possible that he was from amongst those who wrote to al-Imaam (al-Husayn) or from the group of Shabath and others who wrote (to al-Husayn from Kufah)… then he (comes and says) “O Husayn, receive glad tidings of the Fire…”! [Fee Rihab al-Karbalaa (p. 61)]

        • wargame1

          Shia author, Murtadaa Mutahhiree writes, answering the question he asks himself: How did the people of Kufah embark on fighting al-Husayn (alayhis salaam) despite their love of him and their sentimental attachment to him?:
          “And the answer is the awe and fear which had taken root upon the people of Kufah in general since the time of Ziyad and Mu’awiyah, and which increased and grew to alarming proportions upon the arrival of Ubayd Allaah [bin Ziyaad] who upon arrival immediately killed Maytham al-Timaar, Rasheed, Muslim and Haani …” [al-Malhamah al-Husayniyyah (3/47-48)]

          You call yourself a sunni and make false claim against the sunnis.

        • wargame1

          The Shia, Kaadhim al-Ihsaa’ee al-Najafee says:
          “The army that set out to wage war against al-Imaam al-Husayin (alayhis salaam) were 300,000 (in number) all of them were from the people of Kufah. There was not amongst them any Shaamee, Hijaazee, Hindee, Baakistaanee, Sudaanee, Misree, or Afreeqee. Rather, all of them were from the people of Kufah and they had gathered together from many diverse tribes.” [Aashooraa (p. 89)]

        • wargame1

          Shia reference point, Aayat Allaah al-Udhmaa Muhsin al-Ameen said:
          “Then 20,000 from the people of Iraq who had given the pledge of allegiance to al-Husayn acted treacherously to him, revolted against him whilst their pledge of allegiance was around their necks, and killed him.”

          • zabada

            so both of them killed hussain.Saad armies..and syiah (Husssain side at the time.

          • wargame1

            The Shias killed Hussain. This matter is proven from both Sunni and the Shia source.

          • zabada

            be fair to all side.

        • wargame1

          Shia historian Jawaad Muhdithee said:
          “And Imaam al-Hasan was faced by them with treachery, and Muslim bin Aqeel was killed unjustly whilst in their midst and al-Husayn was killed whilst languishing in Karbala, close to Kufah and at the hands of the army of Kufah.”

        • wargame1

          Numerous Shia authorities, from their Shaykhs, quote from Ali bin al-Husayn bin Ali bin Abi Taalib (known as Zayn al-Aabideen) that he addressed the Shia who deserted his father and killed him, reviling them, saying:
          “O people, we implore you by Allaah, do you know that you wrote to my father and you deceived him and you gave him the pledge, the covenant, and you killed him and deserted him? So may you perish for what you have sent forth for yourselves, and for your evil opinionn. With which eye will you look towards the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam) when he says to you, “You killed my family, and you violated my sanctity, so you are not from me.” [Al-Tabarsee in al-Ihtijaaj (2/32), Ibn Taawoos in al-Malhoof (p. 92), al-Ameen in al-Lawaa’ij al-Ashjaann (p. 158), Abbaas al-Qummee in Muntahaa al-Aamaal (1/572), Husayn Kawrani in Fee Rihaab al-Karbalaa (p. 183), Abd al-Razzaaq al-Muqrim in Maqtal Husayn ((p. 317), Murtadaa Iyaad in Maqtal Husayn (p. 87) and Ridhaa al-Qawzeenee in Tadhlim al-Zahraa (p. 262), Abbaas al-Qummee in Nafs al-Mahmoom (p. 360)]

          Do you understand why the ISIS and Iran never attack each other?

        • wargame1

          when Ali bin al-Husayn Zayn al-Aabideen (rahimahullaah) saw the people of Kufah wailing and crying, he rebuked them, saying:
          “You wail and cry for us, so who are the ones who killed us? [Maqtal Husayn of Murtadaa Iyaad (p. 83), Tadhlim al-Zahraa of al-Qazweenee (p. 257) and al-Malhoof of Ibn Taawoos (p. 86), Nafs al-Mahmoom of Abbaas al-Qummee (p. 357)]

        • wargame1

          another narration that Ali bin al-Husayn Zayn al-Aabideen (rahimahullaah) was passing by them(Shias) and he was ill and he said in a weak voice:
          “Are you wailing and crying for us? Who are the ones who killed us? [Abbaas al-Qummee in Muntahaa al-Aamaal (1/570)]

          And in another narration that he said:
          “These people cry over us but who killed us other than them?” [Al-Ihtijaaj of al-Tabarsee (2/29)]

        • wargame1

          Shia sources quoted Umm Kulthum bint Ali (radiallaahu anhumaa) as saying:
          “O people of Kufah, disgrace upon you. What is with you that you deserted Husayn and killed him and you plundered his wealth and inherited it, and you took his women as captives, and you caused him distress. May you perish and may you be annihilated … what burden have you carried upon your backs and which blood have you shed … you killed the best of men after the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa aalihi) and mercy has been snatched from your hearts.” [Nafs al-Mahmoom (p. 262), Maqtal Husayn of al-Muqrim (p. 316), Lawaa’ij al-Ashjaan (p. 157) and others.]

        • wargame1

          the Shia, Asad Haydar quotes from Zaynab bint Ali bin Abi Taalib (radiallaahu anhumaa), which is also mentioned by al-Tabarsee in al-Ihtijaaj (2/29-30):
          “To proceed, O people of Kufah, O people of deception, treachery and desertion … your example is like she who spins (yarn) only to break it after its strength. Is there anything in you but bragging, amazement, rank hatred and lying … do you cry for my brother?! Yes, by Allaah, cry much and laugh little, for you have been put to trial through its infamy … and how do you consider cheap the killing of the descendant of the Seal of the Prophethood.” [Ma’al-Husayn Fee Nahdatihi (p. 295)]

        • wargame1

          Muhsin al-Ameen al-Husaynee al-Aaamilee says in his book “Fee Rihaab A’immah Ahl al-Bayt” (1/9):
          “Zahar bin Qays, he participated in the [battles] of al-Jamal and Siffeen with Ali (alayhis salaam), and Shabath bin Rub’ee and Shammar bin Dhil-Jawshan al-Diyaabee also witnessed [the battle] of Siffeen with him. Then they waged war against al-Husayn(alayhis salaam) on the day of Karbalaa, so it was an evil end (soo’ al-khaatimah) for them and we seek refuge in Allaah from the evil end.”

        • wargame1

          Shammar bin Dhil-Jawshan who personally killed Hussain was a Persian Majoos.

          • zabada

            Saad the Arab Sunni let him to kill hussain..Yazid do nothing to the killers..they are bad sunnis….no syiah at the time..syiah came later years…as a result of the killing. Syiah distorted islam badly till now..of course there are bad believe at the time..but syiah came later years.wahabi emerge in 18 century..also a political movement,covered will religion.

          • wargame1

            The Shia killed Husain. There is no sunni involvement in this matter. There is no such account to be found by both Shia and sunni sources. You invent lie against the Sunnis

          • Reasonableman
          • zabada

            Many of his lecture are true some are false…For me gog magog is Russian..Dajjal is the west.Wahdatul wujud is true..but is allowed by god for a few Muslims…it is a gift.it is the highest state in theology..tauhid…Ibnu arabi is one of saints..Auliaullah..I will not dare to blame them,since Allah sided them.Khidr a.s is their leader..Abdul Kadir jailani is the second of all saints.The prophet married to Aisyah at age 6..and live together at age 9..it is a culture at the time..not an obligation to all muslims..at the time that culture well practiced all over the world.I do believe Syiah is not a muslim..except they eradicate too many weird believe in them.I guess they will assimilate to sunni at the time of almahdi and Isa pbuh in near future..even most Christian will do the same..wahabi still a muslims..but have some false fiqh..false theology..they can assimilate with sunni easily….only few of them….even in Saudi Arabia..I don,t know what will happen to syiah…They are weird people with weird believe…Their ulemas at the past are responsible for their weird believe…Imran hosain on hadith prophecy make sense for me…The prophet did interpreted Islam by his behave….maulid is a sunnah…since sunnah is good things have done, not only by the prophet.but by all muslims.it is a good innovation….A year like a month.and ect….I guess times of dajjal atrocities is short..will be destroyed in near future..I do believe Rum is Rome..and not Russia.That is my humble opinion.

          • Reasonableman

            Wahdat al wujud is the biggest bid’ah in theology.
            Please do some research on this matter. Ibn arabi claimed that he is one with allah astaghfirallah.
            Clearly in surat al ikhlas in the first verse “qul huwa allah hu ahad” say allah is one. Not we are one with allah or allah is everything!

            To claim allah is everything and everything is allah means that you ascribe dunya attributes to allah almighty. Even attributing dirty things like feices astaghfirallah.

            This aqeedah is the same of jahiliyah who used to pray to statues and claim allah is in those statue w ya’uthu billah.

            laysa la mithlahu shay’an fu huwal 3aleem al bassir.

            surat al fatiha “iyaka na3budu w iyaka nesta3een” meaning “it is you we worship and you we seek help” we do not seek help through ibn arabi or jalauldeen al rumi or any of those spinning sufis we have direct meetings with allah which is through salat. The world salat comes from the root word sila which means “to esteblish a connection”.

            I know sufism and ahlul hadith look like brotherhood but brother they are far from the truth ask me because I used to go to their gatherings and honestly it felt like I was in jhanam until some brothers pulled me to the side and taught me aqeeda the way of the salaf and at tabi3een the best of the ummah after muhammed peace be upon him.

          • zabada

            he he he he.So..we live out side Allah.despite Allah is everywhere..and it is impossible for sure.

          • Reasonableman

            Ya akhi ya habibi ya azizi your logic is distorted. You are using the same argument athiests use.

            Can allah create a rock too big for him to carry? The answer is. Allah Creates that which is in continous with his godship. This is allahs wisdom.

            Allah has no begining or end so to associate him with his creations (claiming he is everywhere and everything even feices astaghfirallah) WHICH HAS A BEGINING AND AN END is MAJOR SHIRK. It is rejecting allahs name and attributes (tawheed isma w sifa).

          • zabada

            Your brain can,t fit all big name,s knowledge like Ibnu Arabi,Abdul kadir Jailani,Aljilli,Alhallaj,Ibnu Rumi and many more.These man all a great scholars..it is not their fault..it you who are naive to know and interpreted their secret knowledge.Their name known all over the world,even in the west..and you are not..how can you blame them ?.It is pure Wahabi , who are oppose Sufism and these big name.Even many sunnis are not be able to understand their doctrine and ways,and God will not punish you and them for their ignorant on that highest doctrine,Wahdatul Wujud or Oneness.Peace.

          • Reasonableman

            Now your becoming mystical claiming such a thing as secret knowledge. I think you have been spinning around too long your with the fairies.

            Inallah aleem lguyub(allah is knower of all things hidden) Surat al ma’ida allah says he has completed our religion (islam) and now you claim secret knowledge which even sahaba radiallah w 3anhum did not claim. Itaqallah

          • zabada

            That is regulation and law..divinity is another case..it is to o vast ..to big to know all.Only Sufis can are available to describe the events.That my opinion.It is not fairy tales..it is divinity.Divinity is not a fairy tale.

          • zabada

            innallah aliimul ghuyub..true…but he favor its for of his good slaves,such khidr a.s…Abdul kadir Jailani and there more good people,,even to the The prophet,who knows the future events by his permission.Also khidr a.s know bad future to the kid that he had killed.

          • Reasonableman

            Slow down zabada, khidr alayhi sallam was a chosen prophet of allah. You cannot compare him to the ecstacy munching fairy sufis.

            All prophets had a special attribute to prove to humanity their prophethood. Why? Because allah knows best
            The prophet muhammed peace be upon him was the final prophet and messenger. We seen him alayhisalam perform many miracles. When he passed the miracles stopped and only the quran was left which is a miracle in itself that it has NEVER been changed. Allah tells us

            Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian. (Surat hijr)

          • Reasonableman

            http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2QyeEcAH7Lg
            Sufi black magic (al tareeqa)

            http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bOgV6HqquWA
            Man eating feces to get blessing (taburrak also from sufi tareeqa)

            http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lPYNpBVvumo
            Evil sufi rituals peircing (al tareeqa)

            http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bOgV6HqquWA
            (Sufi wierdos hitting themselves

          • zabada

            Black magic is nothing to do with sufism..where is evidence Ibnu Arabi and others practiced black magic ? Fear god man..there are no great shcolars of the world practice black magic.You are non sense.

          • zabada

            ya habibi..ya akhi..khi..ya maulana..oneness is true .all collide with him tightly, but yau are not aware,Ime also.If not why your breath came and out by your nose without your effort to do that .

          • Reasonableman

            Because allah intends for me to continue breathing. Not because allah is in me or I have a peice of allah astaghfirallah

          • zabada

            ya akhii..ya..uhkti..ya maulaaya..ya habibi..ya habibatii..tanazzulat mean ..all kind of creatures is not God,,.in is makhluk…makhluk came from khalik..the same letter with differences.Before all creatures emerge ,it is only god every where and nothing else and his big is infinity.If all creatures not come from him,so from whom we are came to life and exist,since it is full of him every where,and nothing else exist at the times,only him whoa are exist.

          • Reasonableman

            Really zabada? God is god he does not need something to create something else. Allah is free from need . Humans need something to create something because we are limited allah 3azowajal is not limited.

            Al khaliq is one of allah 3azowajals names but he does not need anything to create something. If you follow this logic it means that allah needed somebody to create him also. Astaghfirallah.

          • zabada

            they know not God is infinity in all his nature..sifat..so they ask wrong question,,God able to create all thing and able to handle all creature ,the biggest or the smallest.no 0 is infity..the greaters number of all numbers. 0 is not 0 it is one 0.By that numbers 1 ,all numbers can be exist,2,3,6,7, thousand..million..billion..to trillion and this number 1 can created all numbers without limit.it is also infinity.That alwahid..God..oneness can create all things without limit,,if he want to..that why he can create the biggest rock in infinity figure..if he want.so in vacancy that exist around you is not a vacancy it is him in it,Without figure or image,,that why idol to dsecribe him is prevented and haraam.Likely to number 0 is not 0..it is one in it.One zero.simple mathematics approach to prove God is exist and how he create all creatures.All numbers from that 0.So all creatures is from him alone.

          • Reasonableman

            Infinity is a theory and does not exist. Has anybody used infinity anything? NO! So don’t use this example

            Numbers is a measuring system created by humans.

            Allah can create as many things as he wants OUT OF NOTHING it does not make them apart of him. Merely his creation.

          • zabada

            that means you know not how big God was.Infinity is a word.and there is no word if its no object to describe.Exist of word mean exist an object first.Words describing every object.Without object there is no word to describe.

          • Reasonableman

            Ofcourse I don’t because picturing how big he was is HARAM. I fear allah 3azowajal because of his attributes which nobody can imagine.

          • zabada

            His big is infinity..not figured that..only know that..hence don,t blame auliaullah..they love god and god love them.You can,t divided the two by your limited knowledge.It is will invite God,s anger on you and we know not that.As small creature we know not many thing..know not who are around us,at the past,now and in future.Hence I will not blame anyone ,including you.Peace.ya akhi..ya azizi..ya maulaya..ya abii..ya ummii..ya ukhtii..ya muslimin muslimat..mukminin ..mukminaat.,,wallahu aklam bissowab.

          • Reasonableman

            Wrong! You cannot explain allah or his creations through infinate theory because infinity is just a THEORY!!!

            Suppose you (zabada) want to walk to close the door. Before you can get there, you must get halfway there. Before you can get halfway there, you must get a quarter of the way there. Before traveling a quarter, you must travel one-eighth; before an eighth, one-sixteenth; and so on.

            This description requires one to complete an infinite number of tasks, which Zeno maintains is an impossibility.

            This sequence also presents a second problem in that it contains no first distance to walk, for any possible (finite) first distance could be divided in half, and hence would not be first after all. Hence, the trip cannot even begin. The paradoxical conclusion then would be that travel over any finite distance can neither be completed nor begun, and so all motion must be an illusion.

          • zabada

            All things are illusion except God,including numbers.But all illusion is a prove the existence of God.It is his attribute.That why some said..nothing exist ..but God….because in creatures sufis seen God in its.But it is not a god.Creatures is something emerge from God him self,but not by birth.So they said nothing else are exist but Allah.Ibnu Ataallah said…who see something..and he is not see god in its..he is a careless person.Its like we saw a car..and we remember and acknowledge its owner..see nothing but its owner..nothing wrong with that..always remember Allah is a great worship..ibadah .Peace.

          • Reasonableman

            Lmao that is so skewed because theory says YOUR god didn’t do shit because YOUR god couldn’t work out where to begin.

            Now your proclaiming a different 3aqeeda altogether that everything is an illusion. Meaning we cannot be one with allah.

            your like an 3aqeeda $ LU+ jumping from one 3aqeeda to another.

            Fear allah the way he should be feared!!

            Please go tweak your mathematics and come back.

          • zabada

            he he he.sufism doctrine is beyond most of people mind..not only you..that is o.k..God will not punish who are not acknowledge this highest doctrine.Otherwise we can,t blame others who are able to acknowledge that.Sufis said..Know God with God…means ..Knows God with helping by God him self..Peace.

          • Reasonableman

            Lek allah yba3dak w ysa3dak

          • zabada

            unite and separation occurs at the same times.It is the relation of the creatures and its creator.Sufis said so,and I see its as true.

        • wargame1

          in the book al-Irshaad of the well-known and famous Shia scholar, al-Shaykh al-Mufeed (2/95-96 onwards) mentions those who set out to fight and kill Husayn:
          “And Umar bin Sa’d arose that morning, and it was the day of Jumu’ah (Friday), and it is said it was Saturday and he mobilized his companions, and then set out with those people who were with him towards the direction of al-Husayn (alayhis salaam), and on his right was Amr bin al-Haaj, and on his left was Shammar bin Dhil-Jawshan, and in charge of the horsemen was Urwah bin Qays and in charge of the infantry was Shabath bin Rub’ee and he gave the flag to Durayd, his mawlaa.”

        • wargame1

          You must be a feces eating Sufi who cleverly conspires against the sunnis in favor of the Shias to hide their crime.
          The sayings of Ahl al-Bayt to the Shia of Kufah, “You wail and cry over us, yet you are the ones who killed us” exposes the fraud, scam and sham that underlies the deen of the Shia which is based upon a ridiculous type of hatred and it is a sign of the lack of intelligence and of simple-mindedness (or otherwise a sign of the deranged maniac-like nature) of those who knowing full well that their own Shia ancestry killed al-Husayn (radiallaahu anhu), harbour the greatest of resentment and hatred towards those who do not share in their simpleton type understanding of history and do not share in their bloodthirsty type of rage, based upon a fake display of anger for the blood of al-Husayn, for they (their Shia ancestors) are the very people who killed al-Husayn after deserting him and being treacherous to him. Then this fake wailing, lamenting and crying became one of the bidahs of the Shia to this day of ours. Refer to the book “Man Qatala al-Husayn” by Abd Allaah bin Abd al-Azeez (Cairo) for further information.

          • Reasonableman

            I reckon this guy is one of those fruit loops who follow only one madhab with or without evidence. Judging by his external he may be pakistani or bangladesh who follow abu hanifa and make takfir on imam bukhari radiallah w 3anhu

          • wargame1

            He sounds like a sufi as he recommended to listen to the lecture of Imran Hussain. This Imran Hossain is a sufi but initially he appeared as a sunni and talk about the end time hadis . He started quoting hadis out of context according to his agenda. Finally he was exposed as a sufi when some people did a back ground check. Now only the Shias are the great fan of Imran Hossain . I asked zabada to bring any reference about the wahabi religion from their book if it exist , but he cant provide any!! The term wahabi is used by the Shia and the sufi against the sunnis.

          • Reasonableman
          • guest

            Or he could be an imposter trying to create Fitna hired by you know who !!!

          • Reasonableman
          • Reasonableman
          • Reasonableman
          • Reasonableman

            http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bOgV6HqquWA

            Sufi tariqa getting tubarruk

    • 5thDrawer

      Logical. And El Supremo just chuckles on …. while all those willing to ‘Die For Allah’ will be fed as fodder to the guns, happily believing in that ‘great promised reward’ in some unseen sky-land, yet never on earth.

  • doron

    such a sweetheart…alienating himself from his puppets.
    Use and dump policy at its finest

  • nagy_michael2

    Finally a man who is telling the truth that many have suspected and the others ignored as silly notions that it was not true. not it could not be true. they forgot that Iran had many Al Qaada leadership before and during the planning of 9/11. It was Syria’s Assad who open the doors for them to flood Iraq to battle American soldiers and even commit suicide against Shiites places of worship. Iran didn’t mind because it wanted Maliki and whatever leadership of Iraq to be weak so it falls back to Iran. again after the american left, Iran instead of supporting the Iraqi Army to bolster its strength against ISIS. It chose Iraqi Militias because the latter will be its own puppets. Assad for a long time didn’t touch ISIS while he was barrel bombing FSA and syrian children. all you M8 and suppoters of these bastard can say that’s it true and accuse Saudi and qatar and everyone else. but the proof was there and you just want to ignore it. May God burn all these evil doers in hell no matter who it’s. I always suspected Iran was the main planner behind 9/11. There is no way Al Qaada would have been able to do such monsterous plan without the backing from a country that is masterful in planning terrorist acts. And Iran is the master of them all.
    yes many say Al Qaada flooded to Syria to fight Assad and Assad had to be brutal. if you really go back to the start it was only syrians getting hunted down by Shabiha and Hezbollah whom they denied total involvement until we verfied dead fighters coming from Syria. even then Assad didn’t want to fight Al Qaada.. had he introduced some kind of democracy in his country, the good Syrian people will not have allowed Al Qaada to step foot in Syria.but Assad, Iran and Hezbollah are good in complicating things in order to save their asses.
    But now they both getting what they deserve. oh what tangled web we weave when we practice to deceive.

  • zabada

    That why America dethrone Saddam Sunni gov to plant instability on behalf of Israel.America know Syiah will massacred Sunni after they favor politic to Syiah..and then Sunni will revolt and massacre Syiah..they know syiah and sunni is an old enemies in politic and theology at the past.They are trying to evolve Syiah Iran,in order to to plant war in full scale,otherwise Syiah refuse to intervene,they konw the game..Then try to bring Turkey to fight and die for Zionist Israel,but Turkey is not fool.Turkey also know the game.They also refuse.America urge Muslims there to kill each others and Israel survive for decades in future.But Zionist eventually make big mistake.Isis growing strong and many are hosting Isis,since there are 90% sunni all over the world.Hence it is difficult to execute them all.All terrorist organization will unite will isis since there have relevant struggle in Iraq and stop to mess in their country such Chehnya,Afghanistan,Libya,Egypt and Saudi.and all over the world,including new whites muslims convert in the west.Zionist plan,s unite them at it best.The hatred to Whites and Jews Zionist not only enrage muslims,but also Syiah and the loyal western people,even Russia.Zionist movement to destroy Arabs just a big mistake.Another big mistake is 9 11,planned also by Zionist,whites Zionist in America are helping them,lead to destruction of Iraq.The world know this and it is take times,nation all over the world will defeat these brutal and unmoral whites Zionist in America,many whites host Zionist there including Israel who robbed Palestine by British mandate.Isis just started uprising and the world will following them except Zionist,whites and Jews and Israel.It,s take times to people of the world to acknowledge these brutal Zionist atrocities on Arabs and to plant new world order all over the world.That why America is fighting all over the world.You guess America and U.K,even Australia is helping others ?.No..they are working for Zionist bankers to enslave all nation.These white Zionist Christian already being slaves to Jews,fighting and dying for their master,Zionist bankers.You kid know nothing..go play something ..or see football on your mum,s t.v.This night Manchester United vs Roma.I sided Roma..how about you?.

    • watch dog

      You are very sick ..You have been brain washed 9/11 people who are full of hate..You are the biggest terrorist blaming everybody but yourself ..you will burn in hell with 78 virgins.

      • zabada

        you are zionist bankers slave.

        • Hind Abyad

          The watching dog gives a copy paste to those he’s watching, i got one too.

        • 5thDrawer

          Yah .. he keeps changing the ‘virgin interest rate’. :-)))))))))))

          • Hind Abyad

            The missing virgins :)..not good watchdog

      • Hind Abyad

        last time it was 71 virgins, before that 72, now it’s 78..

  • guest

    Shiite Imam’s feces and urine smells like musk and are one way ticket to paradise. Whereas a tiny part of imamic saliva will make you speak 70 languages. And if you take teaspoon saliva, then you can speak million languages….Oh boy, Oh boy, surely the rafidah are at lost because their 12th Imam is not willing to offer his feces, urine and saliva to his poor followers.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGBwgzGP6jc

  • guest
  • guest

    Become a Millionaire quick with a Shiite crying doll –

    Do you want to make millions in a short period of time? All you need to do is to buy a crying faced baby doll which will cost you around 800$ / lot. 1 Lot contains 6 dolls. After you get your doll, you need to search for community where rafidis flourish. Put a big sign board saying “Doll crying for Imam Hussein”!! And then place a placard next to your doll with the following points

    1- 10$ for taking picture of the doll.
    2- 30$ for touching the doll to seek barakah and cure.
    3- 50$ for kissing the doll.
    * No mut’ah allowed (this is to save your doll from destruction)

    And you can instantly make millions.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52wsIbANjr4

    • 5thDrawer

      LOLOLOLOL ……
      Teach your child how to beg … nice …

      • wargame1

        That doll looks like Chucky in the “child’s play” movie

  • guest

    The feminine looking shia Imams –

    Extremely shocking video which shows the reality of the Rafidah (Majos in disguise) and how they infiltrated Islam. You will also see in this video how the rafidah majos depict the brave and strong men of the Ahlul-Bait as bunch of transsexuals with feminine looks.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-DItZ79JeM

  • guest

    Shiite Imamic institute for scientific research discovers the cause of unknown diseases and deaths. They have carried out an experiment in Imamic laboratory to support their research.

    All Shiite omelettes must be cooked in accordance with the guidelines in this video. The worst thing you can do is eat a non-shit egg with even sides. Your stomach will implode from the lack of wilaya to El Supremo. (big salavat)

    “An egg that is made from Mutah can cure cancer” Ayatullat Hamoodi Chocolate

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTWGH8XcU2I

    • 5thDrawer

      Nothing more ‘wondrous’ than a Naturopathic salvation, as opposed to vaccinations. :-)))
      And these days, THAT belief is stupidly propagated in many places.

  • guest

    Shia rabbis and priest preach in their husseiniyats that every living and non-living thing is divided into two categories. Namely…Enemies and haters of ahlul-bait (nasibis) and partisan and lovers of ahlul-bait (muwali).

    Even tools, fruits and insects were not spared but included in either of these two categories!!!! So be-careful when you buy fruits because you might end up buying a non-shit watermelon or an apple or orange!!!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEm00-uC9RI

  • guest

    The Mehdisaurus –

    Failing to provide any substantial evidence even from their most authentic hadiths books for the birth or existence of their awaited savior – The 12th Imam – Shia priest Zaman al-Hasnawi tries to come up with strange and new theory to proof that awaited 12th Imam exist. He says that the reason why there is no evidence for his birth is because he was never born to humans. He belongs to other kind of species . . .

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwr7flN_DWw&list=UU2Zh30AueGr3ZgcsZYMMuXw

    • 5thDrawer

      Thanks for the belly laughs … :-))))
      (why do they always need to yell? …)
      I consider that, if I had to spend hours sitting on a floor (falling asleep) while listening to these hugely long discussions/interpretations of humongous volumes of texts which make little sense to the world I see around me, I’d be as confused in the brain as these people.
      Hell, at work I even learned to fall asleep at a computer without moving the mouse in a detrimental manner. Anything like this makes the brain hibernate from the boredom. (here, I can pause it)
      I think if they simply threw out all the Hadiths and Fatwahs and wound it back into a few simple concepts they could yell for 20 minutes max-time, then allowed the folks to only think about it until the next meeting, they would be much better off. It’s no wonder they want to go out and shoot guns at Allah every Friday ‘after Mosque’.
      I consider that the Maoist Chinese used the technique very well for ‘re-education’.
      Hard to inject a ‘free thought’ in the diatribes attempting to ‘prove’ who was right and who was wrong.
      Especially if it doesn’t relate to anything that is ‘right’ in the ‘now’.

      Assuming we are all scholars seeking ‘truth’, is another concept which doesn’t hold up well.
      Let us simply say, ‘the proof is in the pudding’ because you can’t judge the cookbook by the cover.
      What works, and what doesn’t, ‘for’ humans in humanity? One man trying to prove he is more ‘right’ than another – and forcing the model on others – has never worked well.

    • wargame1

      Their Holy book says Shia’s 12 was born before God created human beings!! So that creature is not even a Ahlul Adam…..Ahlul Lizard may be LoL Here is the reference

      According to Al-Majlisi’s Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 51, page 144, Shia’s Mahdi was born before God created human beings.

    • wargame1

      Shia 12 Imam does not have a shadow!! According to Al-Majlisi’s Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, page 322, Al-Mahdi does not a shadow.

  • guest

    Spitting in People’s Food – The Shia Habit

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrthTnf24Rs

    • Anti ISIS

      And not allowing a father to be with his daughter alone is a Sunni habbit. Or should I say part of your religion. After all, you wankers do say that it is a father’s rite to have a go first as he raised her and feed her. And by the way poo jabber, I have heard this first hand from a Sunni girl back in the day that was a professional at using stick if you know what i mean.

      • 5thDrawer

        Assume they just didn’t like the revisions, Anti … :-)))

        • guest

          Yes, they should revise all the Talmudic Shit books as it has been commanded by none other than our angelic Ms. Hind, Mr. 5th !!!

          • 5thDrawer

            AND that STUPID BACKWARD KORAN AS WELL.
            Not to mention all the idiotic ‘Hadiths’ which only lead them (YOU?) back to a future promoting death, in all it’s ‘prophetic wisdom’, by little tin-pot dictators.
            And I’ll jamb some Christians into this lot as well ….

          • guest

            Is that you Mr. 5th with the Satanic Hand Sign !? Trying to communicate with your savior lord, the illuminating Ra / Lucifer / Fallen Angel / Satan / Devil / Iblees / Shit Mahdi / Dajjal / Anti-Christ / Zionist Mashiach /… are we !?

            Please don’t say such hateful things about the teachings n books of Ra, Zionists, Shits, n of course not, Paul’s Bible(s) n his righteous Christians !!!

          • 5thDrawer

            And your ‘alternative’ is …. ????

          • guest

            You know the answer Mr. 5th !!!

          • 5thDrawer

            Not exactly. You are resisting just about everything up there … so much resistance you could be ‘ol Nasty’ himself in a ‘guestly’ form. 😉
            But I was beginning to think you were a ‘Book of Mormon’ type who had failed the ‘song&dance’ classes and was short of a few bucks to do ‘high speed’ on the Salt Flats.
            I’d recommend John Stewart’s book ‘EARTH’ to you, if I thought a smile could help. It’s filled with good notes on the planet and everything. 😉
            But I think in the end I’ll just stick with ‘Anarchist’. You manage to dump on everyone – although your ‘fave’ this week was the shiites for sure.
            I was wondering if you and the ‘IS=US’ guy were bunking together in a ‘survivalist camp’ somewhere in a bush in North Dakota, practicing for the invasion of the ‘body-snatching’ CIA/FBI/IRA conglomerate. Did you get registered for the ‘Health Coverage’ yet?? :-)))
            (naturally, the Aussie outback is a second choice….)

          • Hind Abyad

            Call an ambulance ask to bring the straight jacket…

          • guest

            Call an ambulance ask to bring the straight jacket…

          • Hind Abyad

            Guest lost his tongue..

          • guest

            Hind lost her tongue..

          • guest

            Hind lost her tongue..

      • Hind Abyad

        This looks like a copy of the Talmud: “If a grown man has intercourse with a little girl it means nothing” and so on it continues..Not all Sunnis are of this strange branch, i have friend from Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, wonderful, refined, lovable and kind Sunnis and Christians.

        • 5thDrawer

          Hind .. people living in books of thought from a few thousands years ago can’t be expected to have changed some of the basics, especially when it comes to ‘sex’, since it’s a favourite passion of virtually all humans and driven by the ‘procreation instincts’ which have little to do with societal thinking, although obviously many thought about it a lot – in their weird tribal societies.
          And still do. 😉
          No-one outlawed it completely, did they? It’s only the ‘rules of engagement’ which changed for some of us. :-))

          • Hind Abyad

            I can’t understand it, in the Bible children were beloved, not the same in Talmud..and as i learn here, not only in Talmud.

          • 5thDrawer

            But, you see, we don’t understand it because it isn’t ‘us’ raised by the same standards. It’s the same as ‘them’ not understanding ‘us’. If you are brainwashed from birth to ‘believe’ without question – or forcefully prevented from questioning – you have little else to go by for any comparison.
            This is one of the huge problems that the USA faces, since it hasn’t understood the minds of the Tribes it deals with very well, at all … as it wishes to prompt what it thinks is a ‘better way’, but shoots itself in the foot too often doing it.
            Trying to put yourself into some of the ancient societies really IS difficult … and when we notice the differences, they can be upsetting. But it is what WAS. Be happy you were not stuffed into that – even if you didn’t like snow. 😉
            Also … don’t forget that most of the ‘beloved’ part came in a ‘New Testament’.
            Even if it takes a hundred years or so to change some again, it ‘adapts’ to societal changes. SOME people will never like that sort of thing.

          • Hind Abyad

            everyone back to their country is best, including the West ..they’re gifted in messing up everywhere they go..

          • 5thDrawer

            Naw … it’s just business. That ‘human endeavour’. 🙂
            For example … we can grow a lot of wheat. But eating only bread and Shredded Wheat makes us fat around the middle. And we can’t grow yams. So, we say ‘Let’s trade’ with those guys who have yams.
            And then, there are those who say ‘Let’s make a deal’ … and THAT’S when the fun begins.
            Before long, they even want to trade their citizens. Damn, eh?? :-)))

          • guest

            So that means you will be going back to Iran along with ALL your Stooges !?

            Doron n Mek,… did you hear that !?

            All evil will be in one place and Lebanon, rest of ME, West, Asia….Heck Ya, Whole World would be at Peace, At last !!!

            Please for the sake of World Peace n Humanity, Crawl back to Iran…ASAP !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            Iran occupies your life not mine, what’s with doron and meke..keep doron blease, both of you share same IQ level, when we’re having a discussion you follow to up-vote every pro-Zionist infamy against the Palestinians…. Zionist whore.

          • guest

            What blease !? “Zionist Whore”, changed the sides from Shits to Zionists !? Entertaining n taking Zionist now !? Oh forgot both are the same, sorry !!! BTW, What you Shits have to do with Palestine and Palestinians !? Hadn’t you Shits killed or got them killed enough already by your evil deceptive ploys !? Blease stop this hypocrisy already as it has become outdated, boring, n to the point hilarious !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            Zionist whore, you supported Malmequer, a Zionist who calls Arabs ‘sand niggers’, you support doron Zionist fanaticism, JUST for the kick of it because they hate me, go to hell, you stick around when you’re unwanted, insufferable CRAZY GLUE keep away from me, your hatred is a mental disease.

          • guest

            You did n said all that !? Are you talking about yourself here, ‘stick when unwanted, insufferable CRAZY GLUE my hatred is a mental disease’, “Zionist Whore” !?

          • Anti ISIS

            I get it now ya manyuk, you are so bitter because your ass hurts from all the penis it swallows. I commend you for following in the foot step of Omar. .

          • guest

            No wonder, thanks for describing your sorry Shit state to a T, Ya Manyak !!!
            Go on now and continue doing what that Shaytaan Zindeeq Fruit Khomeini loved to do n commanded all Shits to do as well to gain great rewards n attain heaven !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            You did n said all that !? Are you talking about yourself here, ‘stick when unwanted, insufferable CRAZY GLUE my hatred is a mental disease’, “Zionist Whore” !?

          • guest

            You, Hind described n disclosed your acts to a T !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            You, Hind described n disclosed your acts to a T !!!

          • guest

            Like I said earlier, please take your anger n frustrations to your ayatullahs n imams so they can revise the books and make them according to your liking !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            Like I said earlier, please take your anger n frustrations to your ayatullahs n imams so they can revise the books and make them according to your liking !!!

          • guest

            Exactly, Hind please get that done ASAP for Shits sake !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            Exactly, please get that done ASAP for Shits sake !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            Exactly, Hind please get that done ASAP for Shits sake !!!

          • guest

            Really !??

        • guest

          That’s what the good people have been telling you for long long time, at least you acknowledged Talmud and Shit books have n teach the same things as they are the same they just pretend to be different and show hot air enmity to fool the world and naive good Sunnis !!! Me too I have lots of Shit friends from different places as I am……and not all of them follow that sick perverted teachings of their Shitism and are wonderful, refined, lovable, and kind Shits !!!

      • guest

        So very true poo jabber poo wanker, at least you acknowledged how perverted and sick the Shits are and their Shitism is. So disgusting, yuk….No wonder why Shit women love Mutah so much and are professional you know what and that thing you mentioned, you know what I mean !!!

        • Anti ISIS

          Here is your poo jabber bitch. The one you people worship and call God.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFHPKAPDOck

          • guest

            Poo Jabber Bitch, Did you read and enjoyed what your own Shits websites and books said about the one(s) you love so much and never get tired revering n posting their names !? Oh, may be those Shits are not good Shits like the clown in your video !!!

          • Anti ISIS

            Did i hit a nerve ya penis rider. Don’t get upset, All you need is a good old fatwa from one of you bearded no moustache broom look a like cleric to make you feel good again. Do you why most of you pigs shave your moustache whilst growing a beard, In order to look like your mothers. Bwawawawawa. Now please, go shower you sticky piece of shit. I can smell that shitty beard of yours from here. tfffffff 3a lak wa 3a uslak.

          • guest

            Lol It seems the other way around, no reply hmmm but the truth came n comes out always from your own shits books, websites, scholars,… for the World to see. Lying, cursing, hating, insulting, crawling, stupidity, evilness, proxies, isis, chaos, treacheries, deceptions, vulgarity, filthy acts,….that’s all you piece of Shits penis riders pigs dogs of hellfire are only good for !!! Btw, wonder how your mothers look like with moustaches as you Shits can be born to animals according to your own shitty fatwas so to be born to a man or a woman with a moustache doesn’t really matter, does it !?

          • 5thDrawer

            LOLOLOLOLOL …. worms …. haahahahahahahha … worms and fingers ….. hahahahhaha

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            What a load of trash, people believe this crap.

      • Maborlz Ez-Hari

        Hey Anti once a professional always a professional. You know what i mean. 🙂

    • man-o-war
    • Hind Abyad

      You’re the mad hater, your language is disgusting, it’s filled with violence, your manners are filthy.
      Too bad YaLibnan Moderator allows ilimited access to vent sickening hatred and attack non-fanatics..

      • 5thDrawer

        Yes Hind. A Little overwhelming to get a huge dose of Shiite all at once … even if it’s basically revisions of previous concepts.

        • Hind Abyad

          Such Edification..moral, grace, spiritual, elevated teaching on these pages, don’t you think?

      • guest

        You are the best example of all that. Yes, that would be a long list headed by you and followed by all your sick hatemongers, Islamophobes, Sunni haters, ….!!!

        I am sure Doron, Mek, …. lots of others will concur !!!

        Are you bored nothing to publish…spam…Yalibnan with your hate speeches n mad filthy sick disgusting hate-filled violent fanatic posts, today !?

        • 5thDrawer

          Tsk … not good ‘teaching’ Mr. Guest.

          • guest

            That’s exactly what I tried telling Ms. Hind, Mr. 5th !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            Rather parroting me again like an idiot

          • guest

            Said the Idiot Parrot Herself !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            Said the Idiot Parrot Himself !!!

          • Hind Abyad

            As i just said..these pages are shining lights, illuminating the path to knowledge, teaching to build bridges, to unite people of good will..pfffhhaha….:)))

  • guest
  • guest

    Shiite Ayatullat – We came from Apes n Chimps (Video 1)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhZKfSgLFDo

  • guest

    Shiite Ayatullat – We came from Apes n Chimps (Video 2)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wirs_tE1yKw&list=PLPel1V8z6m417tdOuQbUkgBPo122fzvgf

  • guest

    Best Husseiniyat Chimp Contest –

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FBvuLHWjY0

  • guest

    Beastality is permissible and carry a great reward and considered a divine deed n act in Shiism –

    http://www.sistani.org

    Name: Ali Akbar Mandni

    Subject: Sex with animals

    Question:

    Salam alikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh

    Our master al-Sistani may Allah give you long age and may Allah sanctify your secret and may He make you provision for Islamic Ummah.

    Our Master I have a very embarrassing question. Our master I am unmarried and live in desert, I mean I am a shepherd and bachelor. Everything I need is available like mobile, computer.. but I have too much lust. And there is no one available to have muta’h marriage. With regret I have satanic thoughts in my mind.

    I had sex with two sheeps and a lamb and small calf. And right now I am very afraid because one of the sheep’s stomach became big, and I am afraid it might be pregnant. Is it permissible to have sex with animals our master??

    Because I heard from people its halal. Thank you.

    In his name

    Sex with animals before the mission (Islam) was wide spread and many narrations are narrated that it is halal but makrooh (disliked).

    And on the compulsory precaution one should abandon this practice that may cause self harm. And you must admit this to the owner of the sheep and pay the owner.

    The creed of Shiism and its Shiite Majoos followers are full of Satanic Filth that even other religion would not even vie off. Heres more of Shiism/ Shiite Filth which Shia Majoos are used too.

    Impregnant ANIMALS with Rafidi SPERMS or renting ANIMAL WOMBS to hatch Rafidis in them.

    Source: شبكة السراج في الطريق إلى الله

    339 السؤال:

    لو امكن التلقيح الصناعي علمياً في رحم صناعي أو رحم حيوان .. هل يجوز التقاء المني الحيمن مع بويضة الاجنبية :

    إذا كانا : 1 معلومين 2 مجهولين 3 احدهما مسلما والأخر كافرا ؟

    الفتوى:

    يجوز.

    Translation:

    Question 339:

    If it was scientifically possible to artificially fertilize inside an artificial womb or womb of an animal… is it permissible to mix warm sperms with a foreign (non-mahram) woman’s egg:

    If so happened that:

    1. They (sperm owners) are known

    2. They are unknown

    Fatwah:

    It is permissible.

    Bestiality common in pre-Islamic period but today its DISLIKED (Makrooh)

    الاسم : علي اكبر مندني

    الموضوع : نكاح الحيوانات

    السؤال :

    السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

    مولانا السستاني اطال الله بعمرك وقدس الله سرك وجعلك ذخرا للامه الاسلاميه

    مولانا انا عندي سؤال محرج كثيرا واهوايه يجيني تأنيب الضمير .. مولانا انا غير متزوج واعيش بالصحراء يعني راعي غنم والمعزب موفر كل شيء اريده من موبايل وكمبيوتر .. لكن انا فيني شهوه جدا كبيره

    ولا يوجد مواليه لكي اتزوجها متعه . وللاسف طرا في بالي فكره شيطانيه وانا هوايه متحسف . انا جامعت الخرفان والصخول وعجل صغير . وانا خايف جدا لان احد الخراف بطنها كبير وخايف انها حامل .. هل يجوز نكاح الحيوانات مولانا ؟؟ لأني سمعت من ناس حلال . وشكرا

    بسمه تعالى

    لقد كانت نكاح الحيوانات قبل البعثه منتشره وتروى كثير من الروايات انها حلال لكنها مكروه والاحوط وجوبا ترك هذه العاده التي تسبب الأذى النفسي ويجب عليك الاعتراف لصاحب الاغنام ودفع قيمتها لمالكها

    22 :

    مما يوجب حرمة الحيوان المحلل بالاصل أن يطأه الانسان قبلا أو دبرا و إن لم ينزل ، صغيرا كان الواطئ أو كبيرا ، عالما كان أو جاهلا ، مختارا كان أو مكرها ، فحلا كان الموطوء أو أنثى ، فيحرم بذلك لحمه و لحم نسله المتجدد بعد الوطئ على الاقوى فى نسل الانثى و على الاحوط فى نسل الذكر ، و كذا لبنهما و صوفهما و شعرهما ، و الظاهر أن الحكم مختص بالبهيمة و لا يجري فى وطء سائر الحيوانات لا فيها و لا فى نسلها .

    Issue 22 – Of that which makes a halal origin animal haram is that a human being has sexual intercourse with it, frontally or in back, even if he does not Erupt, whether the doer of the sexual act is a minor or a mature person, knowing or ignorant, choosing (to do it) or compelled, whether the (animal ) that is having sexual intercourse done to it is a steed (male) or female, then by that its meat and the meat of it offspring reborn (?) after the intercourse upon the strongest (view) regarding the offspring of the female and upon the most precautious with regards to the offspring of the male. Likewise is their milk, their wool, and their hair. And what is apparent is that the ruling is specific to the beast (bahima) and does not apply to intercourse with the rest of the animals, not in it and not in its offspring.

    مسألة 23 :

    الحيوان الموطوء إن كان مما يراد أكله كالشاة و البقرة و الناقة يجب أن يذبح ثم يحرق و يغرم الواطئ قيمته لمالكه إن كان غير المالك ، و إن كان مما يراد ظهره حملا أو ركوبا و ليس يعتاد أكله كالحمار و البغل و الفرس أخرج من المحل الذي فعل به إلى بلد آخر فيباع فيه ، فيعطى ثمنه للواطئ ، و يغرم قيمته إن كان غير المالك .

    Issue 23 – The animal which has had sexual intercourse done upon it, if it of (a type) that one wants to eat, like a sheep, and a cow, and a she-camel, then it is wajib to slaughter it then burn it, and the doer of the sexual act is fined its value to its owner if he was not the owner. And if it is of (a type) that one wants to (use) its back to carry (i.e. a beast of burden) or to ride, and its eating is not customary, like the donkey and the mule and the horse, it is taken out of spot in which it was done to another balad (country?) and sold in it. So its price is given for (? Unsure) the doer of the sexual act and he is fined its value if he was not the owner.

  • guest
    • TheUSequalsTheIS

      mohammad was a pedophile for sure, mohammad raped small girls for sure too.
      he was most likely gay too and most likely had sex wid dead ppl while he most likely was a transsexual person.

      • guest

        Really, Zarathushtra was and did all that ! That makes perfect sense why Shit’s Imams look like that and encourage those practices ! No wonder why it looks so obvious that they took a leaf out of Zoroastrianism / Majoosism and Zarathushtra / Zoroaster.
        Thanks Majoosi, the slave of Shits for enforcing the obvious, you were tard (too late) with the confirmation as the whole world beat you by centuries !!!

  • guest

    Eye Opener For All The Naive Followers Of Shiism To Stop Following And Listening To Your False Leaders, Ayatollahs, Imams,… Who Have Brought Nothing But Destruction, Wars, Deceptions, Evil, Chaos,… Not Just To The World But Onto You As Well !!!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnpsxHolKxE

  • man-o-war
  • man-o-war
  • man-o-war
  • man-o-war
  • man-o-war
    • man-o-war

      Women free of menstruation and feces! Awesome

      • 5thDrawer

        Less to spend on Kotex and toilet-paper ….

  • man-o-war
  • man-o-war
    • man-o-war

      This is a good one. Beating your wife etiquette, lol

      • 5thDrawer

        The Acid-throwers are not following the rules, Man-O. :-)))

  • man-o-war
    • wargame1

      Those Pyramids were there long before the advent of Islam and our prophet and his companions never destroyed them. Egypt was under the Islamic rule so if they wanted to destroy the Pyramids they would have done that.

      • Hind Abyad

        What about the historic monuments in Syria.
        http://mic.com/articles/71193/5-historical-monuments-have-been-destroyed-forever-during-syria-s-civil-war
        It serves those who came after the Pyramids?

        • wargame1

          When the Arab Muslims conquered Syria they didnt destroy any historic monuments. Thats why we still see them today. You are pathetic slut looking for every opportunity to demonize Islam

          • Hind Abyad

            The slut is your wife..or wives. How dare you slander me as “demonizing Islam”.
            I have no appetite for sectarianism, doctrines, Dark Ages..I have never, i swear never seen so much Christian bashing mockeries and insults, as those coming from both of you and the Devil’s Guest, or only from Israeli settlers. I know Arab Moslems didn’t destroy historic Monuments when they conquered Syria Irak, i don’t need you to tell me.
            There are FOREIGN Jihads Barbarians from 80 different countries around the World, they invaded 6000 years old Syria and Iraq, they are not Sunni Arabs, not Shia Arabs, not Allawite Arabs, etc…Bright bulb, they are ISIS their ruler is Baghdadi an Arab.
            They also destroyed Sunni historic Mosques and Christians historic Shrines, like Israeli settlers no difference. ISISZionists

          • wargame1

            What is wahabism? What is their doctrine? Have you read their books if you found any biatch?

          • Maborlz Ez-Hari

            They are doing a fine job on their own, she just cares more than others.

    • 5thDrawer

      ‘We’ll dig another river for you’ …. great last line.
      Did they put him in a ‘Nut-House’ after that interview??

  • guest

    Shit Scholars Without Taqiyah – Don’t you just like them for being so honest when they are in their natural habitat !?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CYxa6icenI

  • guest

    Shit Rabbi without Taqiyah – You just can’t stop liking them !

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2eVWS4JLu4

  • guest

    Shit Rabbi caught while lying about Sunnis Books – Why would he do that, we were already beginning to like them !?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ro-VMLNdb4

  • guest

    Shit Grand Ayatollah’s becoming Sunni – Why would they do such a thing !?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SY0MSVlo5x4

  • guest

    Iranian Shit writer becomes Sunni and exposes Shits n Shitism – Why did he do that !?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5n-F6B5oHE

  • guest

    A Shit Ayatollah after being impressed by the True religion starts exposing Shit lies n Shitism – Why !?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syiuhWN77j0

  • guest

    Top Shit Scholars who became Sunni – Why would they !?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HWSekQ1L7I

  • guest

    What Shit rabbis preach in Iran without Taqiyah Hat ON – Why, we already have been believing you since Mehdisaurus times !?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwnFxWl5YzM

  • guest

    In Shit Religion, this is what they Say. All this is from their own Shit Books –

    01. Neither we accept such Lord nor do we accept the Prophet of such Lord whose Caliph is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#2, Pg#278 – Published Iran]

    002. None of the Prophets (a.s) had been bestowed with the Prophet Hood until He declared His belief in the fallacy character of ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#265 – Published Iran]

    003. Disclaimer to the doctrines that fate, benediction and vice belong to ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#293 – Published Iran]

    004. The fourteen innocents (Ma’sumeen) are incomparable and unprecedented like ALLAH. (Na’uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#2 -Published Lahore]

    005. There is no difference between ALLAH and Ali (r.a) such as in the virtues for; The master of Khatim-e-Suleman, The Master of Doomsday, The master of Siraat (The Bridge over Hell) and Renaissance Field, The Creator of leaves on the trees, The one who ripens the fruits, The one who continued fountains, The one who made drift in the canals (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

    006. To call ALLAH Omnipresent and Omniscient is against faith (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

    007. Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his descendants are omnipresent and omniscient, and it is only theirs quality, not of ALLAH’s (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

    008. ALLAH when talks about blessings, does so in Persian and when talks about persecution does so in Arabic (Na’uzubillah). [Tareekh-e-Islam, Pg#163 – Published Lahore]

    009. Shiite confession of faith “LA ILAHA IL-ALLAH-U MUHAMMAD-UR RASOOL-ULLAH ALI-UN WALI-ULLAH WASI-U RASOOL-ULLAH WA KHALIFA-TU BILA FASL” (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#10 – Published Lahore]

    010. Wherever Quran referred the word “RABB”, it meant as Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#66 – Published Lahore]

    011. Original Quran will not come into view till the manifestation of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12 th Imam) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#2, Pg#360 – Published Iran]

    012. Collectors of Quran eliminated virtues of Prophet’s progeny from Surah Al-Ahzab which was about to the length of Surah Al-Bakrah (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#66 – Published Iran]

  • guest

    ARE RAFIDAH SHITS MUSLIMS !?

    WITH REFERENCES FROM THEIR OWN SHIT BOOKS:

    Summary of the Beliefs of the Shits from their own sources –

    They say Allah (swt)
    1.) He has the Quality of ‘Badaa’.
    2) This means he forgets.
    3.) He makes mistakes.
    4.) He plans but this does not take effect.
    5.) He does not know who to appoint as the next message conveyor, the next Imaam.
    6.) “We (shias) do not worship such a god who gives authority to rascals like Yazid, Mu’awiyyah and Uthmaan.”
    7.) They say “Ali says…..I am the first and I am the last. I am the manifest and I am the hidden and I am the heir of earth.”
    8.) Shias say that the Imaams are the face of Allaah,
    9.) The eyes of Allaah among his creation.
    10.) The tongue of Allaah among his creation.

    References :
    (1.) Usul Kafi- Babul bad’aa – Al- Kafi Vol- 1 -P283 India Ed. ( 2.) Ibid (3.) Ibid .(4.) Ibid. (5.) Ibid. (6.) Kashful Asraar – 107 – Khomeni.. (7.) Rijaal Kashsi . 138. India Print. (8.) Usul- e-Kaafi -83. (9.) Ibid. 10.) Ibid.
    New Kalimah (testimony of faith in shiasm)
    1.) Laa ilaaha illaahu Muhammadur Rasulullaah -Alli waliyullah, Khomeni Hujjatulillaah
    2.) Laa Illaaha Muhammdur – Rasulullah, Ali waliyullah wazi Rasulullah was Khalifauhu bila Faslein”
    3.) – Shia ‘Islaam’ based on 5 pillars – Salaat, Zakaat, Fasting, Hajj, Wilaayat.
    4.) – Azaan is “Ash Hadu Anna – alian Waliullah Wasu Rasulullah was Khalifatu hu bila faslrin”

    References:
    (1.) Wahdat Islaami – June 84 P1- monthly Iranian Goverment. Periodical. (2.) Ali Waliullah – Abdul Kareem Mushtaq. (3.) Usul- Kafi. 4.) Listen in Arafaat.

  • guest

    CONTENTS of Al-Kafi : Shits most revered book

    [1] Chapter: The Imams have knowledge of All that was given to the angels and the prophets. ( AlKafi vol.1 p.255 )

    [2] Chapter: The Imams know when they will die, and they only die by their choice. ( AlKafi vol.1 p.258 )

    [3] Chapter: The Imams have knowledge of the past and future; and nothing is hidden from them. ( AlKafi vol.1 p.260 )

    COMMENT: No doubt that these words are clear Kufr (Disbelief) and Shirk (Polytheism), because the knowledge of the unseen is only for Allah alone .. These words with no doubt contradict what Allah said in Surah Luqmaan “Verily, Allah With Him (Alone) is the knowledge of the Hour, He sends down the rain, and knows that which is in the wombs. No person knows what he will earn tomorrow, and no person knows in what land he will die. Verily, Allah is All-Knower, All-Aware (of things)” [Quran 31:34]

    [4] “Obedience to `Ali is true humility and disobedience to him is disbelief in Allah” ( AlKafi vol.10 p.54 )

    [5] “Whoever sets up another Imam besides `Ali and delays `Ali’s caliphate is a polytheist” ( AlKafi vol.10 p.55 )

    COMMENT: These words declare all AhlSunnah as kufaar (Disbelievers) and Mushrikeen (Polytheists), because we -AhlSunnah- do not believe in the Shia Imamate of `Ali ( which is believing that `Ali is Infallible,..etc ) also We -AhlSunnah- believe that Abubakr (r) is the first caliphate, Omar (r) the second and Othman (r) the third, thus, We delay `Ali’s caliphate to be the 4th after Abubakr, Omar, and Othman, thus, Shia declare in their most reliable book that AhlSunnah are Kufaar and Mushrikeen !!!

  • guest

    A simple question for the shits…

    Shias believe that their 12 Imams are Masoom i.e. sin free and free from mistakes…then why is it that Ali (ra) their most sacred Imam married his daughter Kulsoom to none other than Umar Farooq (r). According to the shia beliefs, most of the sahaba’s apostasized i.e. they became Kafir, so how is it that he married his daughter to a Kafir?
    Now a days you will hear and read shias denying that this marriage took place, some would try to confuse you about which ‘kulsoom’ it was who married Umar and would imply that she was not the daughter of Ali (r). However the fact of the matter is that their OWN classical book Al Kafi Fil Furu by their respected Imam Tusi and many other books have mentiond this union, which has become a source of embarrassment to them and so they deny it totally.
    The honest truth is that Ali r loved Abu Bakr and Umar radiallahu Anhum and he EVEN HAD SONS whom he named after them.

  • guest

    The Creed Of Shits From Their Own Sources –

    a. GENERAL POINTS:
    1. The Shia Kalimah is different from the Muslim Kalimah Shahadah. The Shia Kalimah is: La Ila Haa Illallahu Muhammdur Rasoolullahi Aliyun Waliyullahi Wasiyyu Rasulillahi Wa Khalifatuhu Bila Faslin
    2. In the Shia Adhan the words ‘Ashadu Anna Aliyan Waliyullah’ and ‘Hujjatulllah’ are added and also the words ‘Hayya ‘Ala Khayril ‘Amal’ are added
    3. The five pillars of Shiasm are: Wilayat/Imamat, Salat, Fasting, Zakat, and Hajj
    4. One should recite after every Salah: O Allah! Send down your curses upon Abu Bakr, Umar, Othman, Muawiyah, Aishah, Hafsah, Hind, and Ummul Hakam
    5. Lying is extremely meritorious and rewarding
    6. It is extremely important to conceal one’s faith
    7. Deceit and deception is a noble act
    8. Taqiyyah is permissible which is to pretend by doing or saying exactly the opposite of what a person believes or feels. Obfuscation of Shia beliefs is allowed
    9. Nine-tenth of the whole religion lies in Taqiyyah
    10. Looking at private parts of non-Muslims is permissible and it is just like looking at the private parts of an animal
    11. Only the color of the skin has to be covered (if the skin is painted, then a person can walk around without clothes)Imam Baqir appeared without any lower garment and he said it was permissible because he had put lime on his private parts.
    12. Anal sex is permitted
    13. Marriage can be conducted without any witnesses
    14. A person will enter Paradise if they wash and consume a morsel of food which has fallen in excrement
    15. Mutah i.e. temporary marriage/renting out the female body for whatever time period is allowed
    16. The sordid act of Mutah is more rewarding than Salat and Fasting
    17. If Mutah is done once, a person attains the status of Husain, if done twice, the status of Hasan, if done three times, the status of Ali, if done four times, the status of Prophet Muhammed
    18. Whoever does Mutah three times, he will be completely emancipated from the fire of hell
    19. A person is allowed to let someone else benefit from his wife’s private parts
    20. Sunnis are worse than dogs
    21. Sunnis are worse than illegitimate children
    22. Sunnis are not allowed to name their children in Iran with names like Abu Bakr, Umar, Aishah etc.
    23. According to Shia narrations, Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihe Wasallam secretly dictated a manuscript (sahifah) to Ali Radiallahu Anhu that was (upon completion) “seventy feet long”. It contains all the laws of halaal, haraam and everything else a person needs to the extent that it even contains the penalty of a scratch. It is also called the Saheefah of Ali
    24. Jafr is a container made from skin that contains the knowledge of all the Nabis, Wasiys, and Ulema that passed among the Bani Israeel
    25. In a lengthy discussion between Imam Ja’far Saadiq and Abu Basheer, the imam describes the mushaf of Fatimah saying: “A mushaf in which is three times more than your Quran. By Allah, not a single word of it is in your Quran”.
    26. The angels made an error and were in a misunderstanding when Husain (R.A.) was martyred
    27. Feet are not washed in Wudhu. Only Masah and wiping of the feet should be done.
    28. Sajdah Tilawat and funeral prayers are permitted without Wudhu and Ghusl
    29. It is permissible to perform prayers in the direction of the graves of the Shia Imams
    30. Shias break their fast about ten to fifteen minutes after sunset
    31. Tarawih prayers in Ramadhan are not performed by Shias
    32. Mutah Dawriyyah is permissible where ten or twenty men can have sexual relations with one woman in one night
    33. The land of Karbala is better than the Kabah
    34. To ask help from Ali by saying, “Ya Ali Madad”, is not shirk

    b. ALLAH:
    35. The doctrine and quality of Badaa is ascribed to Allah which means that Allah makes mistakes and Allah forgets
    36. In a state of anger, God can not differentiate between friends and enemies
    37. Allah was scared of the companions of Prophet Muhammed Sallallahu Alaihe Wasallam
    38. Allah must judge and decide according to what the human intellect deems beneficial for humans
    39. Allah did not create everything

    c. QURAN:
    40. Quran is incomplete and it has been tampered with interpolated and altered
    41. The Shia Quran is with the final Imam who has been hiding from the age of five in a cave in Iraq since the last 1200 years
    42. Current Quran completely different from Shia Quran
    43. The current Quran right now has more than 6000 verses but the Shia Quran has more than 17000

    d. PROPHETS/SAHABAH:
    44. Prophet Adam (A.S.) is worse than Satan
    45. Accuse Adam (A.S.) of rebellion, jealousy, and malice
    46. Prophets make mistakes which eventually deprives them of Prophethood like Prophet Yusuf (A.S.)
    47. Ismaili Shias believe in the continuation of Prophethood
    48. Prophet Muhammed Sallallahu Alaihe Wasallam was scared of the creation of Allah and did not propagate correctly
    49. Prophet Muhammed Sallallahu Alaihe Wasallam rejected a gift of Allah
    50. Prophet Muhammed Sallallahu Alaihe Wasallam asked for compensation for teaching
    51. Ali (R.A.) had the choice and the option of divorcing the wives of Prophet Muhammed (SAW)
    52. The wives of the Prophet are not considered to be from the family of the Prophet
    53. All the Sahabahs except a few turned apostates and turned away from Islam after the demise of Prophet Muhammed Sallallahu Alaihe Wasaalm
    54. One should dissociate with the 4 idols: Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan, Muawiyya and 4 women Ayesha, Hafsa, Hind, and Ummul Hakam.
    55. One should curse the above after each prayer
    56. Aishah (R.A.) and Hafsah (R.A.) poisoned Prophet Muhammed Sallallahu Alaihe Wasallam
    57. Aishah (R.A.) was a traitor and a hypocrite and she is remembered with the vilest epithets
    58. Aishah (R.A.) committed adultery
    59. Less than ten Sahabah remained on Islam after the Prophet’s death

    e. IMAMAT:
    60. Shias believe in the concept of 12 Imams
    61. The Imams are appointed (mansoos alaih) by Allah just as the Prophets
    62. The 12 Imams are on the same level and are on par with Prophet Muhammed Sallallahu Alaihe Wasallam
    63. The first Imam is Ali (R.A.) and the last Imam is hiding since the age of five in a cave in Iraq
    64. Shia Imams are born from the thighs of their mothers because the private parts are unclean
    65. Shia Imams are Hazir Nazir i.e. they are present everywhere and they are omnipresent
    66. The Imams are ma’soom (i.e. infallible, sinless) like the Prophets
    67. It is compulsory to bring Imaan on the Imams. To reject any Imam is disbelief just as it is disbelief to reject a Prophet
    68. The unconditional obedience of the Imam is compulsory
    69. The Imams receive wahi and revelation
    70. Just as the Ambiyaa and the Prophets are bestowed with certain mu’jizaat and miracles that are proof of their Prophethood, similarly the Imams have been bestowed with certain mu’jizaat that are proof of their Imaamat
    71. The Imams have the right to abrogate any command of the Shariah. It is permissible for them to declare a haraam thing halaal and vice versa
    72. Hazrat Ali Radiallahu Anhu and the rest of the Imams have a greater status than the Prophets
    73. The Imams have more knowledge than the Prophets A.S.
    74. The entire creation including the Prophets were created for the sake of the Imams
    75. A covenant was taken from the Prophets regarding the imaamat of the Imams (that they accepted their imaamat)
    76. The Prophets received prophethood because they had accepted the imaamat of the Imams
    77. Allah Ta’ala had compelled the entire creation including the Prophets to accept, whether willingly or unwillingly, the wilaayat of the Imams
    78. The Ambiyaa gain ‘noor’ and light from the ‘noor’ of the Imams
    79. On the day of Qiyaamah, Ali Radiallahu Anhu will be ahead (in front) of all the Ambiyaa
    80. On the day of Qiyaamah, Ali Radiallahu Anhu’s chair will be on the right of Allah Ta’ala’s throne (arsh) while the chairs of the Ambiyaa will be on the left of the throne
    81. The supplications of the Ambiyaa are accepted through the mediation (tufail) of the Imams
    82. The reason for Aadam Alaihi Salaam not being included among the Ulool Azam Ambiyaa is that he was jealous of the status of the Imams
    83. Ibrahim Alaihi Salaam was first given nubuwwat, thereafter khullat (i.e. he was made the khaleel and bosom friend of Allah) and only then was he given imaamat
    84. Ayub Alaihi Salaam was afflicted with a severe illness because he doubted the imaamat of Ali Radiallahu Anhu
    85. If Moosa Alaihi Salaam was alive it would be compulsory for him to obey the imams
    86. Yunus Alaihi Salaam was swallowed by the fish because he rejected the wilaayat of Ali Radiallahu Anhu
    87. The entire earth belongs to the imam
    88. Shias attribute the following statement to Ali Radiallahu Anhu: “I grant life and death. I am all living and I never die.”
    89. Shias believe that their Imams know whatever is in the hearts of people and they are omniscient
    90. Shias maintain that Rasullullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam told Ali Radiallahu Anhu:
    “O Ali! You are the dayyaan (one who will give reward) of this ummah and you are responsible for their account. You will be the ‘Rukn e A’azam’ of Allah on the day of Qiyaamah. Listen! Certainly the people are going to return to you and you will be responsible for taking their reckoning. The bridge (siraat) will be yours, the scale will be yours and the place of standing (mauqaf) will be yours!”
    91. Many Shia narrations mention Ali Radiallahu Anhu’s title as “Distributor of Jannat and Jahannam”.
    Allamah Baaqir Majlisi has established a separate chapter in his book Bihaar Ul Anwaar entitled: “Certainly he (Ali) is the distributor of Jannat and Jahannam.”
    92. Allamah Baaqir Majlisi the famous Shia scholar writes in his book Hayaatul Quloob : “The status of Imaamat is higher than nubuwwat”.
    93. The imams have knowledge of everything that occurred in the past and everything that will occur in the future and that nothing in the earth and skies is concealed and hidden from them
    94. The imams know when they will die
    95. The imams know the reality of the faith and hypocrisy of every person on earth. They have in their possession a list of all those who will enter Jannat and all those who will enter Jahannam.
    96. The imams know all the different languages of the world and converse in them also
    97. The imams know the languages of the birds and animals
    98. According to Shia narrations, the souls of the imams go on mi’raj on the eve of every Jumu’ah. During this mi’raj they reach the throne of Allah where vast knowledge is given to them.
    99. According to Shia belief, a special book is revealed to the imams every Laylatul Qadr. It is brought to them by the angels and Ar Rooh.
    100. As soon as the Imams are born, they read all the divine books
    101. The Imams are capable of performing all the miracles of the Prophets
    102. Shias do not criticize the quarrels which took place between the followers of their Imams
    103. The companions of the Shia Imams were bereft of truthfulness, trustworthiness, and allegiance
    104. The companions of the Shia Imams did not correctly acquire the knowledge of the Usool (fundamentals) and the Furoo’ (branches) of religion
    105. The final Imam has been in hiding since the last 1200 years in a cave in Iraq. When he will appear, the Prophet and Ali (R.A.) will pledge allegiance to him (Bay’ah)
    106. The final Imam will exhume the bodies of Abu Bakr and Umar and he will hang up their naked bodies and flog them and he will cause them to die 1000 times in a day and night
    107. Aishah will be brought back to life and she will be flogged as well by the final Imam
    108. The final Imam will slaughter all the Sunnis and he will start killing their scholars first
    109. If one does not accept the Shia concept of Imaams then the person is a Kaafir and a non-Muslim
    110. The final imam will appear when there will be 313 sincere Shias

    BIBLIOGRAPHY:
    1. Shi’ite Beliefs, Shaykh Khalid Mahmud, Ph.D, Islamic Academy of Manchester, UK, 20 Pages
    2. Hidayatus Shia, Shaykh Khalil Ahmed Saharanpuri, 844 Pages
    3. Tuhfah Ithna ‘Ashariyyah, Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddith Dehlwi, 826 Pages
    4. Shia kay hazar sawalon ka jawab, Shaykh Hafiz Muhammed Miyanwalwy, 547 Pages
    5. Aqaidus Shia, Muhammed Farooq, 413 Pages
    6. Aayaat Bayyinaat, Shaykh Sayyid Muhammed Mahdi Ali Khan, 360 Pages
    7. Masala tahreefay Quran pur Binori Town ka tahqeeqi fatwa, Mufti Muhammed Inaamul Allah, 213 Pages
    8. Irshadus Shia, Shaykh Muhammed Sarfraz Khan, Maktabah Safdariyyah, 213 Pages
    9. Khomainyism or Islam, Shaykh Dhiyaur Rahman Farooqi, 160 Pages
    10. Shi’ism exposed, Majlisul Ulama of South Africa, 150 Pages
    11. Sunni standpoint on Shias, compiled by Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaat for the Supreme court of Pakistan, 102 Pages
    12. The truth about Shi’ism Part 1, Majlisul Ulama of South Africa, 26 Pages
    13. The truth about Shi’ism Part 2, Majlisul Ulama of South Africa, 21 Pages
    14. Shia Madhab kay chalees bunyadee aqeeday, Shaykh Abdus Shakoor Lakhnawi, 64 Pages
    15. Sunni Shia muttafaqah tarjamh Quran ka azeem fitnah, Shaykh Qadhi Mazhar Husain, 28 Pages
    16. Shia ithna ashariyya or aqeedah tahreefay Quran, Shaykh Manzoor Nomani, 28 Pages
    17. Shia madhab, Shaykh Aashiq Ilahi Bulandshehri, 40 Pages
    18. Taayeed madhab ahlus sunnah tarjamah rad rawafidh, Imam Mujaddid Alf Thani, 92 Pages
    19. Assawaiqul Muhriqah, Shaykh Ibn Hajar Alhaytami, 2 Volumes
    20. The difference between the Shii and the majority of Muslim scholars, Saeed Ismaeel, Carbondale, IL, US, 34 Pages

  • guest

    Shits Creed and Hate filled quotes from their own books with references –

    New Kalimah (Testimony Of Faith)

    1.) Laa ilaaha illaahu Muhammadur Rasulullaah -Alli waliyullah, Khomeni Hujjatulillaah
    2.) Laa Illaaha Muhammdur – Rasulullah, Ali waliyullah wazi Rasulullah was Khalifauhu bila Faslein”
    3.) – Shia ‘Islaam’ based on 5 pillars – Salaat, Zakaat, Fasting, Hajj, Wilaayat.
    4.) – Azaan is “Ash Hadu Anna – alian Waliullah Wasu Rasulullah was Khalifatu hu bila faslrin”

    References:
    (1.) Wahdat Islaami – June 84 P1- monthly Iranian Goverment. Periodical. (2.) Ali Waliullah – Abdul Kareem Mushtaq. (3.) Usul- Kafi. 4.) Listen in Arafaat.

    Imaamology

    1.) They believe in 12 Imaams after Rasulullaah .
    2.) First being Ali (R.A).
    3.) Last being the 12th Imaam
    4.) Who is in a Cave ‘Surra – Man- Raa’.
    5.) Imaams they believe are Masoom- innocent.
    6.) They can make Halaal- Haraam and Haraam – Halaal .
    7.) They can change Deen- Sharia.
    8.) They are born of their mothers thighs.
    9.) They have the knowledge of the Unseen.
    10.) They say Imaams are higher in status than the Ambiyaa including our Nabi.
    11.) No concession regarding Wilaayah- (absolute necessary belief).
    12.) If one does not accept Imaams then one is a Kaafir.

    References:
    (1.) Usul -e – Kafi. (2.) Usul -e – Kafi. (3.) Usul -e – Kafi. (4.) Usul -e – Kafi. (5.) Usul -e – Kafi Vol 1 P225 / Kafi – Kitaabul Hujjuah. (6.) Usul -e – Kafi Vol 1 P225. (7.) Ibid. (8.) Ibid /Haqqul Yaqeen P126.(9.) Usul -e – Kafi Vol 1 P225. (10.) Ibid / Al Hukumatul – Islaamiyaa – 52 Khomeni. Hayaatul Qutoob Vol 3, P10 /Ibid Vol 2. P787. Footnote. (11.) Usul -e- Kafi Vol 2. P278. (12.) Usul -e- Kafi Vol 1. P225.

    The 12th Imaam

    1.) When he comes he will bring the original Quraan.
    2.) He is in hiding, in a cave.
    3.) He is alive observing the world, in totallity.
    4.) When he comes, he will be naked. Rasulullaah will swear Allegiance to him. (Allaah protect us).
    5.) He will first dig the grave of Abu Bakr (R.A) and Umar (R.A),then hang them on a stake – for all sins of mankind.
    6.) He will remove the body of Ayesha (R.A) and implement the same punished for Zina.
    7.) He will then kill the Sunni Scholars.
    8.) Punish the Muslim Ummuah.
    9.) First kill Ahle – Sunnah, then Ulama, then Kuffar.

    References:
    (1.) Usul-e- Kafi. (2.) Islaamic Goverment P42/ Usul -e- Kafi P340. (3.) Hukumatal Islaamia -P52. (4.) Haqqul Yaqeen 2/227- 2/347. (5.) Haqqul Yaqeen P 361/2. (6.) Also Vol 2 P 611/ Haqqul Yaqeen – P 347/ Mullah Baqir Majlisi. (7.) Furoo Kafi – Kitaabul Raudah – P 527 also Tafseer Majmanul Bayan/ Hayaatul Qulub Vol2 P 611. (8.) Hayaatul Qulub Vol2 P 611.( 9.) Haqqul Yaqeen- Vol 2. P 527 ASlo Maj Manul Bayaan.

    Qur’aan

    1.) Not Completed.
    2.) Has 17,000 Aayats.
    3.) Our’s has 6,666.
    4.) Abu Bakr’s opposed the text of the Quraan.
    5.) Original Quraan with 12th Imaam Mahdi.
    6.) Do not produce Haafiz.
    7.) Do not perform Taraweeh.
    8.) Quraan will be read/ learnt when 12th Imaam brings it.
    9.) Ali (R.A) showd original Quraan to Sahabah(R.A) who rejected it.
    10.) Passages mentioning virtures of Ali(R.A) has been purposefully deleted from the Quraan.
    11.) There are 2,000 shiah traditions making many additions and subtractions in Quraan.
    12.) The ‘Murtaddeen’- renegrades have removed the name of Ali (R.A).

    References:
    (1.) Usul Kafi 1:228/ Faslul Kitaab fi Tahrif. Kitaabi Raabul Arbaa of Nuri Tibarsi approved by Khomeni in ‘ Al- Hukumaat -ul- Islamiyaa”. (2.) Usul Kafi P671. (3.) Usul Kafi P671. (4.) Kashful Asraar P111.(5.) Usul Kafi 2-632. (6.) See Iran. (7.) See Iran. (8.) Usul Kafi – p622. (9.) Maqbool – 1067 – Usul Kafi Vol1 P228. (10.)Tafseer Ali Qummi-308 /Usul Kafi 1:416/Footnotes of Maqbool’s translation 637/ Al- Ihtijaj- Tabarsi- 1-254/ Tafseer of Saafi- 1- 32/ Muqaddamah 6 , from Tafseer Saafi P32 Vol -1. (11.) Usul Kafi 1:228/ Faslul Kitaab fi Tahrif. Kitaabi Raabul Arbaa of Nuri Tabarsi.(12.) Surah Muhammad, Ayat 9, Para 26- Molvi Maqbool Dehli P1011.

    Taqiyyah (Essentially Means To Lie To Hide The Truth)

    1.) The believe in Taqiyya.
    2.) This means ‘Holy Deception’.
    3.) To believe in something but express/ say something else.
    4.) They say 9-10th of Deen is Taqiyya.
    5.) They say, he who has no Taqiyya has no deen.
    6.) There is a great reward in Lying.
    7.) They say the great Imams Practised ‘Taqiyya’.
    8.) They say Alli (R.A), Hassan (R.A), Hussain(R.A) practiced ‘Taqiyya’.
    9.) They say Hussein (R.A) practiced ‘Taqiyya’.
    10.) Perorm Jamaah salaat with Sunni’s.
    11.) Visit their sick .
    12.) Perform their Janazah Salaat.

    References:
    (1.) Usul -e- Kafi. (2.) Ibid. (3.) Ibid. (4.) Ibid. (5.) Ibid. (6.) Ibid. (7.) Islaamic Goverment P35/ 133 .(8.) Ibid. (9.) Ibid. (10.) Usul -e- Kafi. (11.) Ibid.(12.) Ibid.

    Sahaabah (Companions)

    1.) They say all Sahabah (R.A) companions except 3 left Islaam after demise of Nabi .
    2.) They say Abu Bakr(R.A) Umar(R.A) and Uthmaan (R.A) robbed Ali(R.A) of his position of being Khalif.
    3.) They say Umar(R.A) was a ‘Original Kaafir’ and ‘Zindiq’-renegrade.
    4.) “Abu Huraira (R.A) was one of the fuquaha, but god knows what judement he falsified for Muaw’iyya and others like him, and what damage He inflicted upon Islaam.”
    5.) They say Abu Huraira (R.A) used to fabricate Ahadith.
    6.) They say Muawiyya (R.A) poisoined Hassan(R.A).
    7.) They say Muawiya (R.A) was a tyrant opressive ruler.
    8.) They say Qazi Shurray (R.A) used to issue judicial pronouncement in favour of the ruling party. He was a sinful wretch occupying position of Judge.
    9.) One should dissociate with the 4 idols: Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan, Muawiyya and 4 women Ayesha, Hafsa, Harid, Umm-al-Hakam.
    10.)One should curse the above after each prayer.
    11.) Pharoah and Hamaan refer here to Abu Bakr and Umar.

    References:
    (1.) Anwaar – No’maan Niyyah – P245. Vol 2. Nimatullah Jafaari./ Furu Kafi, Kitaabul Raudah :15 – Mullah Muhammad bin Yaqoob Kulaini Vol 3 P115/ Usul -e-Kafi Vol 2, P 246 Rijaal Kashsi P504. (2.) Al- Ihtijaaj – Tibrasi 83, 84./Haqqul Yaqeen, P 157. (3.) Haqqul Yaqeen , 551/Kashful Asraar P119. (4.) P 143 – Islam goverment. (5.) Islaamic Goverment (6.) Al-Anwaar un Nomaniyyah – Vol 2. P88-87 Jazaari.(7.) Ibid. (8.) P81, Isl/ gov. (9.) Haqqul Yaqeen- Vol. 2 P519/ Furru Kaafi P342 Vol 3/ Jilaa – ul- Uyoom -P45 – 46/ Hayaatul Quluub P 375. (10.) Ainul Hayaa P559. (11.) Haqqul Yaqeen P342.

    Sahaabah

    12.) Faathima should complain about Ali’s big stomach, no wealth and bad features.
    13.) Abu Bakr and Umar are Kaafirs
    14.) Abu Bakr is calf on Bani Israel.
    15.) Ali is a mosquito and a fly.
    16.) What did the Zuleikha of Makkah, Bibi Ayesha have, that the 50 year old Nabi got moved to her.
    17.) Nabi accepted (in marriage) an uncouth person such as Hafsa. Not withsatanding the fact that she was a widow and facially deformed.
    18.) Imaan refers to Ameerul- Mu’mineen- Alli Kufr refers to Abu Bakr fisq(weakness) refers To Umar isyaan(disobedient) Uthmaan in Surah Hujuraat.
    19.) Umar is an illegeitimate child.
    20.) Abu Bakr and Umar are worse than Shaithaan and they are dwellers of Jahannam.
    21.) “When I entre Makkah and Madinah as the conqueror, my first duty will be to go to the grave of Huzoor and exhume the bodies of the two idols.”
    22.)”We shia’s know the three Sahabah’s(Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthmaan) as being void of Imaan”

    References:
    (12.) Mullah Baqir – Jilal Uyoon- 58 Chapter on Faathima.(13.) Haqqul Yaqeen – P552. (14.) Haqqul Yaqeen – Tafseer Qummi P160. (15.) Tafseer Qummi P29. (16.) Haqeeat Fiqh Hanafi P64 /Ghulaam Hussain Naqui.(17.) Ibid P124.(18.) Usul-e- Kafi P229. Vol 2.(19.) Tazkiratul Aimma – P103-4.(20.) Haqqul Yaqeen – P509 – 510.(21.) Kitaab be Noujawanaan – P8.( 22.) Tajalliyaar-e-Sadaqaat – P201- Muhammed Hussain Dhelvi.

    Mut’a (Temporary Marriage, Legalised Prostitution)

    1.) “It is disliked but permissable to have Mutah with a prostitute, especially( it will be more enjoyable) if she is famous for her prostitution.”
    2.)One time ‘Muta’ reward is Jannat.
    3.)When the couple sit in Solitude, angels protect them.
    4.)Their Speech is Tasbeeh .
    5.)When they touch hands, sins fall from their fingers.
    6.)When they Kiss, reward of Hajj and Umrah for both.
    7.)On bathing – every drop from each hair brings reward of 10 Thawabs, 10 sins drop, stages raised by 10 fold.
    8.)From every drop of water, angels created to make Tasbeeh till Qiyaamat.
    9.)’Muta’ with believing women is like 70 times journey to Ka’aba.
    10.) Contractors of ‘Muta’ will cross the ‘Pul Siraat’ like a flash of lightning.
    11.) After making muta Once – The stage of Hussain is reached. After making muta twice – The stage of Hasan is reached. After making muta thrice- The stage of Ali is reached. After making Muta Fourth- The satge of Rasulullaah is reached

    References:
    (1.) Tahrirul Wasillah Vol-2 P292. (2.) Ujul – e- Hasana P15. (4.) bid.( 5.) Ibid.( 6.) Ibid. (7.) Ibid. (8.) Ibid. (9.) Ujul – e- Hasana P16.(10.) Ujul – e- Hasana P17. (11.) Tafseer Mianjajus Sadiqeen 1:356.

    General

    1.) They have their own Quraan.
    2.) They have their own Ahadith Books(Usul-e-Kafi) etc.
    3.) They do not believe in our Ahadith Kitaabs- Bukhari etc.
    4.) They have their own Fiqh, Fiqh – Jafari.
    5.) They have their own concept about Allaah.
    6.) They believe that Imaams get ‘Wahy’ Divine Revelation.
    7.) Their Aqaaid, Salaat, Azaan, Hajj, Fiqh is different.
    8.) The concept of Ambiyaa (A.S) is different (they failed).
    9.) Their concept of Sahaabah (R.A) is different.
    10.) They Practice ‘Muta’(Temporary Marriages) .
    11.) Terms of Sehri and Iftaar are different.
    12.) Ghusl for the dead is different.

    References:
    (1.) Usul-e-Kafi .( 6.) Usul -e-Kafi .(7.) Usul-e-Kafi Vol2 P278/ Tafseer – al- Waeelah Vol 1 P280.(8.) Ijtihaad – wa- yak- jihati- Khomeni -15/ Islaamic Goverment P37/ Tehtan Times 29 June 1980/ Knomeni Imaam Mahdi Celebration. (11.) Tafseer – al- Waeelah Vol.(12.) Ibid.

    General

    13.) 4 Imaams are dogs.
    14.) Ummah like Swine’s.
    15.) Ayesha and Hafsa are both Hypocrites
    16.) Ayesha and Hafsa – Poisoned Nabi before his death.
    17.) May Allaah curse them (Ayesha/Hafsa) and their fathers (Abu Bakr and Umar).
    18.) Their religion of the state of Iran is Islaam and Jafaari, Ithna Ashaari. This basis is forever, and it is not open to any amendment nor abrogation.
    19.) Everybody, exept us Shites are illegitimate.
    20.) Nasabi group are those who preferred Abu Bakr and Umar over Ali.
    21.) It is true that Allaah has not created anything more despicable than dogs.
    22.) But the Nasibi is even more despicable than dogs in the eyes of Allaah.
    23.) People of Makkah openly refute existence of Allaah.
    24.) People of Madinah 70 times more unclean and polluted than people of Makkah.

    References:
    (13.) Tazkiratul Aimma P102- Baqir majlasi.(14.) Usul-e-Kafi Vol2 P337.(15.) Hayatul Qutub – 2:745- M.B.Majlis.(16.) Maqbool Dehlavi – Imaam Baqir- Surah Ali Imraan : 134.(17.) Ibid.(18.) Constitution . (19.) Furoo – Kafi in Kitaabul Raudah – 135/245.(20.) Haqqul Yaqeen 521.(21.) Ibid 2/516. (22.) Ibid 2/516/ Ilaalus Sharaa P299 – Shaykh Saduuq. Usul-e-Kafi P410 Vol …( 23.) Ibid.

    General Ummah

    1.) Most dirty and polluted left over water is that of a sunni.
    2.) Not permissable to marry sunni because they are Kaafir.
    3.) Cannot eat animal slaughtered by sunni.
    4.) Sunnis created from soul of Jahannam.
    5.) Shia’s created from soul of Jannat.

    References:
    (1.) “Manlaa Yahuruldul Faqiah” – Vol 1. P8.( 2.) Tahdhidul Akaam/ Ibid Vol 3 P258. (3.) Ibid.( 4.) Usul – e- Kafi. (5.) Ibid.

    Fiqh Examples

    1.) Folding right hand on left hend in Salaat breaks Salaat.
    2.) Sex in one’s wifes anus permissible.
    3.) The 9th act which breaks Salaat is saying of ‘Amen’ intentionally after Sura Faatiha. But this, too, is Permissible under Taqaiyyah.
    4.) No cover over the head in Ihraam .

    References:
    (1.) Tafseer – al- Waseelah. (2.) Tafseer – al- Waseelah- Vol.1 P280. (3.) Ibid. (4.) See – Hajj time.

  • guest

    Shits Taqiyyah revealed from their own books with references –

    One other Imami Shia doctrine that must be related is the doctrine of Taqiyyah, or dissimulation, (i.e. calculated deception). In support of this doctrine of deception, the shia attribute the following to Abu Abdullah (Ja’far as-Sadiq):

    “Nine tenths of religion is taqiyyah (dissimulation), hence one who does not dissimulate has no religion.” (Al-Kafi vol.9 p.110)

    “He who conceals his religion has saved it, and he who makes it public has destroyed it.“

    “A believer who does not dissimulate is like a body without a head.” (Tafseer al-Askari)

    “Mix with them (i.e. non-shia) externally but oppose them internally.” (Al-Kafi vol.9 p.116)

  • guest

    Shit Websites and Books Confirm Umm Kulthoom’s Daughter of Ali (ra) Marriage to Umar (ra) – How can that be even possible when Shits hate, curse, insult, … him so much !? Why would Ali (ra) give her Daughter’s hand in marriage to such a man !?

    There are at least four Shia Hadith in Al-Kafi that confirm the marriage of Umm Kulthoom bint Ali to Umar bin Khattab. Here, we provide Shia websites that quote these Hadith.

    The first two Hadith appear under the heading “Chapter of Umm Kulthoom’s Marriage.”

    Al-Shia.com says

    “باب تزويج ام كلثوم
    Translation: Chapter of Umm Kulthoom’s Marriage

    source: http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/al-kafi-5/213.html

    Narration 1

    Al-Shia.com says

    “9536 – 1 – علي بن إبراهيم، عن أبيه، عن ابن أبي عمير، عن هشام بن سالم، وحماد، عن زرارة، عن أبي عبدالله (ع) في تزويج أم كلثوم فقال: إن ذلك فرج غصبناه

    Translation: Ali ibn Ibrahim—from his father—from Ibn Abi ‘Umayr—from Hisham ibn Salim and Hammad—from Zurarah, who narrates that:

    “Abu Abdullah (a.s) said about the marriage of Umm Kulthoom: “That was the vagina that we were forced to give.”

    source: http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/al-kafi-5/213.html

    Narration 2

    Al-Shia.com says

    “محمد بن أبي عمير، عن هشام بن سالم، عن أبي عبدالله (ع) قال: لما خطب إليه قال له أمير المؤمنين: إنها صبية قال: فلقى العباس فقال له: مالي أبي بأس؟ قال: وماذاك؟ قال: خطبت إلى ابن اخيك فردني أما والله لاعورن زمزم(4) ولا أدع لكم مكرمة إلا هدمتهاو لاقيمن عليه شاهدين بأنه سرق ولاقطعن يمينه فأتاه العباس فأخبره وسأله أن يجعل الامر إليه فجعله إليه

    Translation: Muhammad ibn Abi Umayr—Hisham ibn Salim, who narrates that—Imam Jafar as-Sadiq said:

    “When [Umar] proposed to Amir al-Mu’minin, he said, ‘She is a child.’ Then he [Umar] met Abbas and asked him, ‘What is wrong with me? Is there a problem with me?’ Abbas asked, ‘Why?’ Umar replied, ‘I asked your nephew for his daughter’s hand in marriage, and he rejected me. Oh, I swear by Allah, I will fill the well of Zamzam with earth, I will destroy every honor that you have, and I will set up two witnesses to testify that he stole, that I may cut off his right hand.’ Abbas thereupon came to Ali and informed him of what had transpired. He asked Ali to put the matter in his hands, and Ali complied.”

    source: http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/al-kafi-5/213.html

    Then, we read in the foot-note on the same page, in which we read that the Hadith are in reference to Umm Kulthoom bint Ali and Umar bin Khattab:

    Al-Shia.com says

    “ام كلثوم هذه هى بنت امير المؤمنين عليه السلام قد خطبها اليه عمر في زمن خلافته فرده اولا فقال عمر ماقال وفعل مافعل

    Translation: “[Regarding] Umm Khulthum, who is the daughter of Ameer al-Mu’mineen Ali, Umar proposed to Ali for her hand in marriage during his [Umar’s] caliphate, and at first Ali refused him. So then Umar said what he said, and did what he did [i.e compelled Ali by words and force].”

    source: http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/al-kafi-5/213.html”

    Narration 3:

    Al-Shia.com says

    “1) (10902 1) حميد بن زياد، عن ابن سماعة، عن محمد بن زياد، عن عبدالله بن سنان، ومعاوية ابن عمار، عن أبي عبدالله عليه السلام قال: سألته عن المرأة المتوفى عنها زوجها أتعتد في بيتها أو حيث شاء‌ت؟ قال: بل حيث شاء‌ت، إن عليا عليه السلام لما توفي عمر أتى أم كلثوم فانطلق بها إلى بيته

    Translation: Humayd ibn Ziyad—Ibn Sama‘ah—Muhammad ibn Ziyad—Abdullah ibn Sinan—Muawiyyah ibn ‘Ammar—Imam Jafar as-Sadiq:

    “I asked him about a woman whose husband died: ‘Should she spend her ‘iddah in her house, or where she wants to?’ He [the Imam] replied, ‘Where she wants to. When Umar died, Ali came and took Umm Kulthoom to his house.’”

    source: http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/al-kafi-6/85.html

    Narration 4:

    Al-Shia.com says

    “2) (10903 – 2) محمد بن يحيى، وغيره، عن أحمد بن محمد بن عيسى، عن الحسين بن سعيد، عن النضربن سويد، عن هشام بن سالم، عن سليمان بن خالد قال: سألت أباعبدالله عليه السلام عن امرأة توفى زوجها أين تعتد، في بيت زوجها تعتد أو حيث شاء‌ت؟ قال: بلى حيث
    شاء‌ت، ثم قال: إن عليا عليه السلام لما مات عمر أتى ام كلثوم فأخذ بيدها فانطلق بها إلى بيته

    Translation: Muhammad ibn Yahya and others—Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Isa—al-Husayn ibn Sa‘id—an-Nadr ibn Suwayd—Hisham ibn Salim—Sulayman ibn Khalid, who says:

    “I asked him about a woman whose husband died: ‘Should she spend her ‘iddah in her house, or where she wants to?’ He [the Imam] replied, ‘Where she wants to. When Umar died, Ali came and took Umm Kulthoom to his house.’”

    source: http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/al-kafi-6/85.html

    Additionally, the Hadith are narrated through various forms which are available on various Shia websites:

    557) 156 محمد بن يعقوب عن حميد بن زياد عن ابن سماعة عن محمد بن زياد عن عبدالله بن سنان ومعاوية بن عمارعن ابي عبدالله عليه السلام قال: سألته عن لمرأة المتوفى عنها زوجها تعتد في بيتها أو حيث شاء‌ت؟ قال: بل حيث شاء‌ت ان عليا عليه السلام لما توفي عمر أتى أم كلثوم فانطلق بها إلى بيته
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/tahzib-8/a9.html

    (558) 157 وروى الحسين بن سعيد عن النضر بن سويد عن هشام بن سالم عن سليمان بن خالد قال: سألت ابا عبدالله عليه السلام عن امرأة توفي عنها زوجها اين تعتد في بيت زوجها أو حيث شاء‌ت؟ قال: بل حيث شاء‌ت ثم قال ان عليا عليه السلام: لما توفي عمراتى ام كلثوم فاخذ بيدها فانطلق بهاالى بيته.
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/tahzib-8/a9.html

    ثم قال : « إنّ علياً عليه السلام لما مات عمر أتى اُم كلثوم فأخذ بيدها فانطلق بها إلى بيته ….
    http://www.rafed.net/books/aam/aalam-nesa/014.html

    1) (221) 14 فأما ما رواه محمد بن علي بن محبوب عن أحمد بن الحسن عن الحسين عن حماد بن عيسى عن شعيب بن يعقوب عن أبي بصير عن أبي عبدالله عليه السلام قال: النداء والتثويب في الاقامة من السنة.
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/tahzib-2/a9.html

    2) ((6997)) 4 ـ وعنه، عن أحمد بن الحسن، عن الحسين، عن فضالة، عن العلاء، عن محمد بن مسلم، عن أبي جعفر (عليه السلام) قال: كان أبي (عليه السلام) ينادي في بيته بالصلاة خير من النوم،

    وما رواه هو أيضا عن أحمد بن الحسن عن الحسين عن فضالة عن العلا عن محمد بن مسلم عن أبي جعفر عليه السلام قال: كان أبي ينادي في بيته
    بالصلاة خير من النوم
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/books/tahzib-2/a9.html

    عبد الله بن سنان قال سألت أبا عبد الله (ع) عن المتعة فقال لا تدنس نفسك بها
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/ara/boo…ehar100/b19.htm

    علي بن إبراهيم، عن محمد بن عيسى، عن بعض أصحابنا، عن أبي الحسن موسى (عليه السلام) قال: إن الله عزوجل غضب على الشيعة (1) فخيرني نفسي أوهم، فوقيتهم والله بنفسي.
    http://www.alhikmeh.com/arabic/mktb…alkafi01/09.htm

    Ali ibn Abi Talib (رضّى الله عنه) gave his daughter, Umm Kulthoom bint Ali, in marriage to Umar (رضّى الله عنه). This very fact shatters the entire Shia paradigm, and the false idea that the Three Caliphs were enemies of Ali (رضّى الله عنه). The marriage of Umar (رضّى الله عنه) to Umm Kulthoom is documented in Al-Kafi, which is considered the most authentic book of Shia Hadith.

    Conclusion

    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was on very good terms with the Three Caliphs, and they were Sahabah (Companions) one to another. Ali (رضّى الله عنه) served as vizier and top aid to all three Caliphs; therefore, the Shia historical accounts of bad blood between the House of Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and the Three Caliphs is false.

    As can be seen, all of the Three Caliphs (which the Shia insult and call the “three fools”) were linked to Prophet Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) through marriage, blood, or both. That is how close companions the Three Caliphs and the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) were.

  • guest

    Shit Websites and Books Confirm Abu Bakr (ra) and Ali (ra) Related Through Marriage – How can that be even possible when Shits hate, curse, insult….him so much !?

    The Shia propagandists accuse Abu Bakr and Umar of being Nasibis (enemies of Ahlel Bayt). In reality, however, Abu Bakr and Umar were flag bearers and loyalists of Ahlel Bayt, and they were similarly loved by Ahlel Bayt. The Shia claim that Abu Bakr and Umar usurped the Caliphate of Ali. And yet, as is well-known, a point that completely destroys the Shia paradigm is that Ali wed his own daughter, Umm Kulthoom, to Umar. This is confirmed on the Shia website, Al-Islam.org, which admits that Ali wed his daughter to Umar.

    But a point that many laypersons are not aware of is that not only were Umar and Ali thus related by marriage, but similarly were Abu Bakr and Ali related by marriage. Shaykh Ehsan Elahi Zaheer writes:

    Asma bint Umais, as is already mentioned, was the wife of Ali’s real brother, Jafar ibn Abi Talib. When he died, she was married to Abu Bakr. She also gave birth to Abu Bakr’s son named Muhammad. Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) appointed him the governor of Egypt. After the death of Abu Bakr, Ali ibn Abi Talib married her. A son named Yahya was born out of the marriage.

    Shia References:

    (1) Haqq al-Yaqeen, by Majlisi
    (2) Kitab al-Irshad, by Mufid
    (3) Jila ul-Uyoon, by Majlisi
    (4) Majalis-il-Mu’mineen, by Shoshtri

    (ash-Shia Wa Ahlul-Bayt, p. 121)

  • guest

    Shit Websites and Books Confirm Ali ibn Abi Talib (ra) Named His Sons after the First Three Caliphs – How can that be even possible and why would Ali (ra) do such a thing when Shits hate, curse, insult,… the First Three Caliphs !?

    If Ali’s wife was killed by Umar, and if he himself was persecuted by Abu Bakr and Uthman, then why in the world did Ali name three of his sons after the Three Caliphs? It is a historical fact that Ali named three of his own children as Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman.

    This fact is recorded by the classical Shia scholar, Shaikh Mufid, in “Kitab al-Irshad”, pp. 268-269, where these three sons of Ali are listed as numbers 12, 6 and 10 respectively.

    Al-Shia.com excerpts this book and it is viewable here:
    http://al-shia.com/html/ara/books/ershad-1/a10.html

    http://rafed.net/books/hadith/ershad-1/index.html

    Therefore, this is not a matter of debate, since Al-Shia.com itself documents how three of Ali’s sons were named Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman.

    No one, not even the most magnanimous of people, names his son after his enemies who were responsible for the death of his wife and unborn child. That is why one simply cannot find a Shia today named Abu Bakr, Umar or Uthman.

    This fact categorically rejects the Shia paradigm which is based upon the false idea that Ali disapproved of Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman. In fact, not only were they not enemies, but rather they were Sahabah (companions) and friends to each other, so much so that Ali honored them by naming his children after them. This shatters the very basis of Shi’ism which is centered around the supposed oppression of the Ahlel Bayt at the hands of the Sahabah.

    There is no chance that a man today would name his children after the murderers of his wife/child who had the same exact names. Likewise, the Shia accuse Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman of oppressing his family, killing his wife and unborn child; it is therefore highly unlikely that Ali would then name his children after them. Why would a person name one of his sons after the man who killed another one of his sons?

    Furthermore, if Ali named one of his sons after one of the Three Caliphs, then perhaps we could claim coincidence. But rather, Ali named three of his children after the Three Caliphs. Think about it: if Tom, Dick or Harry came into my home and killed my wife/child, do you think I would then name my children after all three of these individuals? Fine, if one of my children was named Tom, then we could claim coincidence. But suddenly when it becomes Tom, Dick, and Harry, it just seems like too big a coincidence.

    Ali had eighteen sons, and there are hundreds of names to choose from. Why in the world would he pick three names after the three people he hated and who oppressed his family? The Shia faith is based around the oppression of the first Three Caliphs and yet here we see that Ali named his sons after them.

    Ali named two of his sons Umar and two of his sons Uthman. Surely, this is not random chance, but rather we see that Ali named his sons after prominent Islamic figures, as many Muslims do today. Maybe one Umar could be a chance, but Ali named two of his sons Umar, and another two he named Uthman, and another one he named Abu Bakr!

    Let us look at the naming scheme chosen by Ali for his sons:

    1. Muhammad ibn al-Hanafia
    2. Muhammad al-Asghar
    3. Muhammad il-Awsat

    4. Abbas “abul-fazil”
    5. Abbas al-Asghar

    6. Jafar al-Akbar
    7. Jafar al-Assghar

    8. Abdullah il-Asghar
    9. Abdullah il-Akbar
    10. Abdullah “Abi Ali”

    11. Uthman al-Asghar
    12. Uthman al-Akbar

    13. Umar al-Akbar
    14. Umar al-Asghar.

    15. Abu Bakr ibn Ali

    16. Al-Hasan
    17. Al-Hussain
    18. Awn

    Is it all coincidence that Ali named the majority of his sons with duplicate names, with names of family and companions? Fourteen of the eighteen sons are named in either duplicate or triplicate. This was not random! It would be an astronomical coincidence. If Ali’s naming scheme was random, why can we not find other common names of Arabia? Like Obaid, Zuhayr, Zubayr, Sufyan, Bilal, Amr, Yasir, Miqdad, Abu Dhar, Faris, Abdul-Rahman, Abdul, and any other of the hundreds of names…

    Ali named three of his sons after the Prophet Muhammad. Muhammad is a common name, and is in fact,the most common name amongst the Muslims. Would it be justified then for someone to claim that perhaps it was another Muhammad after whom Ali was naming his sons after? It is altogether too obvious that Ali named his sons after the Prophet and nobody else.

    Looking at the names of Ali’s sons, we find that all of the names are those of Hashimites or prominent Sahabah (Companions). For example, there is the name Abbas which was the name of the Prophet’s uncle, and then there is Jafar the name of Ali’s brother, and the name Abdullah which is the name of the Prophet’s son. And then we have the name Abu Bakr, two Umars, and two Uthmans. This is surely not a random naming pattern, but rather it is very deliberate indeed.

    Let us look at how astronomical the coincidence is that the Shia are asking us to accept. Ali had eighteen sons. Naming one son, randomly, with the name of someone he hates has a likelihood of happening 1/18 times, or a 5.6% chance. Mathematically speaking, we see that the chance that five of his sons would have the name of someone Ali hates is virtually nil.

    (1/18)x(1/18)x(1/18)x(1/18)x(1/18) = 1/1,889,568 = <0.000001%

    There is less than one percent of a one percent chance that the naming of his sons was random. If the Shia are still not convinced and would like to live in the fantasy world that this is just a coincidence, then there is nothing any rational person can do to convince them.

    When we hear the name Abu Bakr, do we stop and ask “which one?” When we hear Umar, do we stop and ask “which one?” When we hear Uthman, do we stop and ask “which one?” When we look into Shia books and read about how supposedly Ali was oppressed by Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman, do we then question which people we are talking about? Suddenly, when Ali named five of his sons after the Three Caliphs, then it doesn’t refer to that Abu Bakr, that Umar, or that Uthman! This is the double standard of the Shia, and the myopic way in which he views history, oblivious to facts and reality.

    Ali had these children before the completion of the first three Caliphates. Therefore, there was no “order” of Caliphs as of yet. Furthermore, Ali was friends with these three individuals and there is no necessity that he name his children in the order of their rank, since most people do not even know how many children they plan to have! How many Shia parents name their eldest son as Hasan and a younger one as Ali? Does anyone stop them and say “oh, that’s out of order” since Ali was the first Imam whereas Hasan was the second? Surely this is nonsense!

    To completely negate this rather creative (yet insignificant) argument, we shall provide an example very dear to the Shia: we call the reader’s attention to the seventh Imam of the Shia, Imam Musa al-Kadhim, who named his elder son with the name of the sixth Imam of the Shia and named his younger son with the name of the second Imam of the Shia!

    In any case, the coincidence is too large, since Ali named three of his children after all three of the Three Caliphs. The fact–namely that Ali named his sons Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman–shows that the Shia paradigm cannot possibly be a true one and rather it is based on Shia myths and fabrications. The Four Rightly Guided Caliphs were good friends and Sahabah (Companions) to each other. Indeed, Ali was the vizier and top aid of the Three Caliphs during their respective Caliphates. It is up to the reader to either accept the less than 1% chance that it was a coincidence that Ali named his sons with the names of the men who supposedly killed his wife and unborn child, or to accept the more rational conclusion that Ali was on good terms with them and named his sons after them.

  • guest

    Shit Websites and Books Confirm that all their Imams starting from the 1st up until the 10th named their Sons and Daughters after the First Three Caliphs and the Wives of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) which Includes Aisha (ra) – How can that even be possible and Why would they all name their kids after the people whom Shits hate, curse, insult,…!?

    Al-Shia.com excerpts this book and it is viewable here:
    http://al-shia.com/html/ara/books/ershad-1/a10.html

    http://rafed.net/books/hadith/ershad-1/index.html

    The First Imam’s Ali ibn Abi Talib (ra) Children

    This fact is recorded by the classical Shia scholar, Shaikh Mufid, in “Kitab al-Irshad”, pp. 268-269, where these three sons of Ali ibn Abi Talib (ra) are listed as numbers 12, 6 and 10 respectively.

    1. Muhammad ibn al-Hanafia
    2. Muhammad al-Asghar
    3. Muhammad il-Awsat

    4. Abbas “abul-fazil”
    5. Abbas al-Asghar

    6. Jafar al-Akbar
    7. Jafar al-Assghar

    8. Abdullah il-Asghar
    9. Abdullah il-Akbar
    10. Abdullah “Abi Ali”

    11. Uthman al-Asghar
    12. Uthman al-Akbar

    13. Umar al-Akbar
    14. Umar al-Asghar.

    15. Abu Bakr ibn Ali

    16. Al-Hasan
    17. Al-Hussain
    18. Awn

    Is it all coincidence that Ali named the majority of his sons with duplicate names, with names of family and companions? Fourteen of the eighteen sons are named in either duplicate or triplicate. This was not random! It would be an astronomical coincidence. If Ali’s naming scheme was random, why can we not find other common names of Arabia? Like Obaid, Zuhayr, Zubayr, Sufyan, Bilal, Amr, Yasir, Miqdad, Abu Dhar, Faris, Abdul-Rahman, Abdul, and any other of the hundreds of names…Indeed, we see that when a person names multiple sons with the same name, then this becomes clear that it is because he reveres the namesake.

    The Second Imam’s Hasan ibn Ali (ra) Children

    In fact, the descendants of Ahlel Bayt were known for the fact that they most times chose names for their children based on revered and respected figures of the past. For example, let us look at the list of Imam Hasan’s children, as found in Shaykh Mufid’s book (Kitab al-Irshad, pp.289-290):

    1. Zayd
    2. Qasim
    3. Abdullah
    4. Umm Abdullah
    (all are names of the Prophet’s sons)

    5. Ruqayya
    6. Fatima
    7. Fatima
    (all are names of the Prophet’s daughters)

    8. Umm Salama
    (name of the Prophet’s wife)

    9. Umm al-Hasan
    10. Umm al-Husayn
    11. Hasan
    12. Husayn
    (all are names of Prophet’s grandsons)

    13. Talha
    (This child’s mother was Umm Ishaq, the daughter of Talha ibn Ubayd-Allah; in other words, this child too was named after his grandfather, keeping in line with the idea that the Ahlel Bayt named their family after loved ones and revered personas.)

    14. Abdur-Rahman
    15. Umar
    (the names of the Ashara Mubash Shararah, i.e. the ten highest ranking of the Sahabah who were promised Paradise)

    The Third Imam’s Husayn ibn Ali (ra) Children

    The third Imam of the Shia, Husayn ibn Ali, named his children as follows (Kitab al-Irshad, p.379):

    1. Ali
    2. Ali
    (Are the Shia perplexed as to whom these two sons were named after?)

    3. Fatima
    (the name of the Prophet’s daughter)

    4. Abdullah
    5. Abdullah
    6. Abdullah
    (the name of the Prophet’s son)

    7. Sukayna

    8. Abbas
    (the name of the Prophet’s uncle)

    9. Abu Bakr
    10. Uthman
    (the name of the second and third Caliph)

    The Fourth Imam Ali ibn Husayn Children

    The fourth Imam Ali ibn Husayn of the Shia named his children as follows (Kitab al-Irshad, p.391):

    1. Muhammad
    2. Hasan
    3. Husayn
    4. Husayn
    5. Ali
    (Any question as to whom these children were named after?)

    6. Abdullah
    7. Zayd
    (the name of the Prophet’s children)

    8. Umar
    9. Abdur-Rahman
    (the names of the Ashara Mubash Shararah, i.e. the ten highest ranking of the Sahabah who were promised Paradise)

    10. Sulayman
    (a Prophet’s name)

    The Fifth Imam Muhammad ibn Ali Children

    We read the names of the fifth Imam’s children, according to Shaykh Mufid’s book (Kitab al-Irshad, p.406):

    1. Abu Abdullah
    2. Abdullah
    (the name of the Prophet’s son)

    3. Ibrahim
    (a Prophet’s name)

    4. Ubayd-Allah
    (the name of the Prophet’s cousin, i.e. Ubayd-Allah ibn Abbas)

    5. Ali
    (the name of the Prophet’s cousin)

    6. Zaynab
    (the name of the Prophet’s daughter)

    7. Umm Salama
    (the name of the Prophet’s wife)

    The Sixth Imam Ja’far ibn Muhammad Children

    And let us now look at the names of Imam Jafar’s children, i.e. the sixth Imam of the Shia (Kitab al-Irshad, p.430):

    1. Abdullah
    (the name of the Prophet’s son)

    2. Abbas
    (the name of the Prophet’s uncle)

    3. Ali
    (the name of the Prophet’s cousin)

    4. Fatima
    (the name of the Prophet’s granddaughter)

    5. Muhammad
    (the Prophet’s name)

    6. Ismaeel
    7. Ishaq
    8. Moosa
    (names of Prophets…is there any doubt in that when one is named Ismaeel and the other Ishaq?)

    9. Umm Farwa
    (Imam Jafar named his daughter Umm Farwa after his own mother whose name was Umm Farwa as well. Do the Shia propagandists not see how the Imams of Ahlel Bayt named their children after their loved ones? It should be noted that Umm Farwa was the daughter of Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr who was, according to Sunni and Shia alike, a very close friend of Ali ibn Abi Talib.)

    10. Asma
    (Named after the famous Asma bint Umays, who was in fact the mother of that same Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr, i.e. Umm Farwa’s grandmother. The Shia reader would be reminded that this Asma bin Umays is the same who married Jafar ibn Abi Talib as well as Ali ibn Abi Talib.)

    The Seventh Imam Musa ibn Ja’far Children

    The seventh Imam of the Shia (Imam al-Kadhim) named his children as follows (Kitab al-Irshad, pp.457-458):

    1. Ali
    2. Aliyya (feminine version of Ali)
    3. Jafar
    4. Umm Jafar
    5. Ubayd-Allah (after Ubayd-Allah ibn Abbas)
    (the names of the Prophet’s cousins)

    6. Hasan
    7. Hasan
    8. Hasana (feminine version of Hasan)
    9. Husayn
    (the names of Prophet’s grandsons)

    10. Umm Kulthoom
    11. Zaynab
    12. Ruqayya
    13. Ruqayya the younger
    14. Fatima
    15. Fatima the younger
    16. Umm Abeeha (Fatima’s famous epithet)
    17. Zayd
    18. Abdullah
    19. Qasim
    (the names of the Prophet’s children)

    20. Abbas
    21. Hamza
    (the names of Prophet’s uncles)

    22. Hakeema

    23. Muhammad
    24. Ahmad
    (the Prophet’s name)

    25. Khadija
    26. Aisha
    27. Umm Salama
    28. Maymoona
    (the names of the Prophet’s wives)

    29. Amina
    (the name of Prophet’s mother)

    30. Burayha
    (Imam al-Kadhim named this son after his companion Burayha, a man who had converted at Imam al-Kadhim’s own hands. The reader should refer to Lesson 19 of “The Question Of Imamate” by Sayyid Mujtaba Musavi Lari available on Al-Islam.org)

    31. Fadl (the name of Ibn Abbas’s brother whom the Shia claim supported Ali over Abu Bakr)
    32. Lubaaba (name of Fadl and Ibn Abbas’s mother)

    33. Ibrahim
    34. Ismaeel
    35. Haroon
    36. Ishaq
    37. Sulayman
    (names of Prophets)

    The Eighth Imam Ali ibn Musa Children

    The eighth Imam of the Shia, Ali ibn Musa al-Rida, had only one son and his name was Muhammad. (Kitab al-Irshad, p.479) Once again, we ask the Shia: who was this Imam naming his child after? Was it Prophet Muhammad, or could we use the argument that “Muhammad” was such a common name that it doesn’t necessarily mean that it was after the Prophet? Truly this would be a laughable argument, so why do the Shia propagandists further it with the names of the Three Caliphs?

    The Ninth Imam Muhammad ibn Ali Children

    The ninth Imam of the Shia, Imam Muhammad ibn Ali al-Jawad, had four children according to Shaykh Mufid (Kitab al-Irshad, p.495):

    1. Ali
    2. Moosa
    3. Fatima
    4. Imaama

    Other than the name Imaama, we see the same names popping up again and again and again! Surely this is not all coincidence! Lightning is striking a dozen times for the Shia!

    The Tenth Imam Ali ibn Muhammad Children

    As for the tenth Imam of the Shia, he named his children with the following names (Kitab al-Irshad, p.506):

    1. Hasan
    2. Husayn
    3. Muhammad
    4. Jafar
    5. Aisha

    Is it not interesting that the Shia would laugh at us if we said that Hasan was not named after the second Imam, or if we said that Husayn was not named after the third Imam, or if we say that Muhammad was not named after the Prophet, or if we said a similar thing about the name Jafar? Why is it then that suddenly the Shia becomes blinded when he sees the last name in the list and suddenly it is “just chance.” Subhan-Allah the Shia only fool themselves! It is very clear that this Imam of the Shia was naming all his children after the elite Sahabah and heroes of Islam! The only confusion is in the eyes of the Shia who have to sit in their rooms and start thinking up colorful explanations to explain away the facts on the ground.

    The Eleventh Imam Hasan Al-Askari Children

    As for the eleventh Imam of the Shia, the Shia claim that he had a son named Muhammad “The Shia Mahdi” who went into occultation and that he will come out of his occultation one day even though the truth is eleventh imam died without any offspring.

    Anyways we see that all of the Imams of the Shia named their children after the heroes of Islam. We see the names popping up again and again: Hasan, Husayn, Abbas, Abdullah, Qasim, Jafar, Muhammad, etc. In fact, according to Shaykh Mufid’s book, we find that over 90% of the children of the Imams of Ahlel Bayt were named after revered and respected Sahabah. Therefore, the argument that Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman were simply common names of the time falls to the wayside, because this same argument can then be applied to the names Hasan, Husayn, Abbas, etc. If the Shia claim that the names of the Three Caliphs were very common back then, then let us retort that the names of Hasan, Husayn, etc. were far more common yet no Shia would accept that the Imams named their children after any other Hasan or any other Husayn.

    The above lists was taken from revered Shia scholar Shaykh Mufid’s book. It should be noted that not a single name listed in Shia Shaykh Mufid’s book was missed, and so it is clear that over 90% of the children were named after respected ones. This is an undeniable pattern; so when the Imams would name their children as Abu Bakr, Umar, or Uthman, it is highly more likely that they did this after the heroes of Islam instead of simply by chance.

  • guest

    Shit Websites and Books Confirm that Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), and Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) Hated the Shia – How can that even be possible and Why did they Hated Shits that much !?

    Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), and Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) hated the Shia’t Ali, the people who claimed to be their followers. The Shia were barbaric, ignorant, and uneducated Beduins from Iraq (i.e. Kufa) and Egypt who were new converts to Islaam and who mixed the Deen with their pagan beliefs. They were strongly affected by Abdullah Ibn Saba, the heretic who would try convincing the Shia’t Ali that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was divinely appointed and had powers above that of a normal human being. Ibn Saba’s followers were known as the Saba’ites, the ancestors of the modern day Shia.
    Abdullah Ibn Saba knew that if Ali (رضّى الله عنه) or the Caliph found out about this cult that was forming [i.e. the Saba’ites] then the authorities would clamp down on them. So Ibn Saba taught his people to use Taqiyyah (lying to save one’s religion) and Kitman (hiding one’s faith). Due to this fact, both Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and the Caliph had a hard time figuring out who exactly were the Saba’ites. Additionally, most of Ali’s time (رضّى الله عنه) was spent in Mecca and Medinah, far away from Kufa and Egypt where the Shia’t Ali and the cultish Saba’ites were growing. It is narrated that on more than one ocassion did Ali (رضّى الله عنه) find out about a Saba’ite and either kill him or expel him. But for the most part, Abdullah Ibn Saba was successful in getting the Saba’ites to infiltrate the ranks of the Shia’t Ali.

    Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), and Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) would soon hate the Shia’t Ali for their exaggerations, barbarism, and their cowardice on the battlefield. Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), and Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) hated their so-called supporters, and wished to be freed of them. These Shia would claim that they love Ahlel Bayt and yet they would continually betray and backstab Ahlel Bayt, and do things that the Ahlel Bayt forbade. Imam Jafar as-Sadiq (رضّى الله عنه) said the following about the so-called Shia:

    “No one bears greater hatred towards us [the Ahlel Bayt] than those who claim to love us.” [Abdullâh al-Mâmaqânî, Miqbâs al-Hidâyah vol. 2 p. 414 (Mu’assasat Âl al-Bayt li-Ihyâ’ at-Turâth, Beirut 1991) quoting from Rijâl al-Kashshî.]

    Ali condemned the Shia multiple times, and it is all recorded in the Nahjul Balagha, which the Shia consider sacred. Let us examine Sermon 34 in which Ali (رضّى الله عنه) says that his so-called supporters are not really his supporters and that he wants to be rid of them. You can also view the sermon on Al-Islam.org which is the most reliable Shia wesbite on the net.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 34
    During the fight against the people of Syria [Muawiyyah], Ali said to his Shia:

    “Woe to you. I am tired of rebuking you. Do you accept this worldly life in place of the next life? Or disgrace in place of dignity? When I invite you to fight your enemy your eyes revolve as though you are in the clutches of death, and in the senselessness of last moments. My pleadings are not understood by you and you remain stunned. It is as though your hearts are affected with madness so that you do not understand. You have lost my confidence for good. Neither are you a support for me to lean upon, nor a means to honour and victory. Your example is that of the camels whose protector has disappeared, so that if they are collected from one side they disperse away from the other side.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/34.htm
    In the same sermon, Ali (رضّى الله عنه) also condemns the Shia for being trouble-makers and fitnah-mongerers, saying:

    “By Allah, how bad are you for igniting flames of war.”

    Hasan did not trust these Shia either as they were very disloyal. In his book al-Ihtijâj, the prominent Shia author Abu Mansur at-Tabarsi has preserved the following remark of Hasan:

    “By Allah, I think Muawiyyah would be better for me than these people who claim that they are my Shia.” [Abû Mansûr at-Tabarsî, al-Ihtijâj vol. 2 p. 290-291 , Mu’assasat al-A‘lamî, Beirut 1989]

    Distrusting his Shia, Hasan (رضّى الله عنه) made peace with Muawiyyah (رضّى الله عنه) and gave him the Caliphate. His Shia protested at this, and Hasan’s reply (رضّى الله عنه) is preserved in the most important of the Shia books of Hadith, Al-Kafi:

    “By Allah, I handed over power to him for no reason other than the fact that I could not find any supporters. Had I found supporters I would have fought him day and night until Allah decides between us. But I know the people of Kufa. I have experience of them. The bad ones of them are no good to me. They have no loyalty, nor any integrity in word or deed. They are in disagreement. They claim that their hearts are with us, but their swords are drawn against us.”

    (Al-Kafi, vol. 8, p.288)

    Hussain’s cousin Muslim Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) was sold out to Yezid’s men by the Shia. Muslim Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) sent a message to Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) warning him about the Shia of Kufa:

    “Do not be deceived by people of Kufa. They are those same Shia of your father from whom he so dearly wished to part, by death or by being killed. The Kuffans have lied to me and have lied to you, and a liar has no sense.”

    Before being executed, Muslim Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) said about the Shia:

    “O Allah, You be the Judge between us and our people. They deceived us and deserted us.”

    Then, Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) would be betrayed by the Shia of Kufa, who would feed him to Yezid’s men who slaughtered Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) at Karbala. Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) would say before being martyred,

    “Our Shia have deserted us.”

    And the Shia betrayal of the Ahlul Bayt did not stop with Ali, Hasan, and Hussain; indeed, they did not even spare Hussain’s grandson, Zayd ibn Ali ibn Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). The Shia would betray him on the battlefield, defecting against him. Before being martyred, Zayd (رضّى الله عنه) said:
    “I am afraid they have done unto me as they did to Hussain.”
    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) condemned the Shia so many times in the Nahjul Balagha, page after page of how much he reviled the people who claimed to be his supporters. Here, Ali (رضّى الله عنه) says that Allah will destroy the Shia of Kufa if they continue to be decietful, and he asks Allah to change his Shia for other supporters, because he distrusts his Shia who are not really his supporters but rather his enemies:

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 25
    Ali chastises the Shia of Kufa:

    “O’ Kufa, if this is your condition that whirlwinds [of deciet] continue blowing through you, then Allah may destroy you…Your disobedience of your Imam in matters of right and their [the Syrian’s] obedience to their leader [Muawiyyah] in matters of wrong, their [the Syrian’s] fulfilment of the trust in favor of their master [Muawiyyah] and your betrayal, their good work in their cities and your mischief. Even if I give you charge of a wooden bowl I fear you would run away with its handle.”

    Ali invokes Allah against his Shia:

    “O my Allah, they are disgusted of me and I am disgusted of them. They are weary of me and I am weary of them. Change them for me with better ones”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/25.htm%5D
    In the next sermon, Ali (رضّى الله عنه) asks Allah to curse the looks of his Shia because they betray him in the Battle of Siffin.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 183
    Ali says to his Shia at the Battle of Siffin:

    “Keep quiet, may Allah make you ugly, O you with broken tooth. Certainly, by Allah, when truth became manifest even then your personality was weak and your voice was loose. But when wrong began to shout loudly you again sprouted up like the horns of a kid.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/183.htm
    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) talked about how he knew that his supporters were really traitors. He mentions it in this next sermon.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 4
    Ali says about his Shia:

    “I always apprehended from you consequences of treachery and I had seen you through in the garb of the decietful.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/4.htm
    How many times did the Shia betray the Ahlel Bayt on the battlefield? First, they betrayed Ali (رضّى الله عنه) in the Battle of Siffin. Second, they betrayed Hasan (رضّى الله عنه) who refused to even fight Muawiyyah (رضّى الله عنه) after that. Third, they betrayed Hussain’s cousin (Muslim Ibn Aqil) after they swore allegiance on his very hand, and the Shia let the men of Yezid take him away to his execution. Fourth, the Shia betrayed Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) on the battlefield, allowing Yezid’s men to chop him up. Fifth, the Shia betrayed Hussain’s grandson (Zayd ibn Ali ibn Hussain), defecting against him on the battlefield and leading to his death.

    Let us see what Ali (رضّى الله عنه) had to say about the treachorous and cowardly Shia:

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 29
    Ali says to his Shia:

    “O people, your bodies are together but your desires are divergent. Your talk softens the hard stones and your action attracts your enemy towards you. You claim in your sittings that you would do this and that, but when fighting approaches, you say (to war), “turn thou away” (i.e. you flee away). If one calls you (for help) the call receives no heed. And he who deals hardly with you his heart has no solace. The excuses are amiss like that of a debtor unwilling to pay. The ignoble can not ward off oppression. Right cannot be achieved without effort. Which is the house besides this one to protect? And with which leader (Imam) would you go for fighting after me?”

    “By Allah! deceived is one whom you have deceived while, by Allah! he who is successful with you receives only useless arrows. You are like broken arrows thrown over the enemy. By Allah! I am now in the position that I neither confirm your views nor hope for your support, nor challenge the enemy through you. What is the matter with you? What is your ailment? What is your cure? The other party [Muawiyyah’s Syrians] is also men of your shape (but they are so different in character). Will there be talk without action, carelessness without piety and greed in things not right?!”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/29.htm
    In fact, Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was completely exasperated with the Shia and he invoked Allah’s curse upon them:

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 36
    Ali says to his Shia:

    “You are a group whose heads are devoid of wit and intelligence. May you have no father! Allah’s woe be to you!”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/36.htm
    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) could not stand his so-called Shia, and he disparaged them repeatedly.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 39
    Ali says about his Shia:

    “I am faced with men who do not obey when I order and do not respond when I call them. May you have no father! Woe to you! What are you waiting for to rise for the cause of Allah? Does not faith join you together, or sense of shame rouse you? I stand among you shouting and I am calling you for help, but you do not listen to my word, and do not obey my orders, till circumstances show out their bad consequences. No blood can be avenged through you and no purpose can be achieved with you. I called you for help of your brethren but made noises like the camel having pain in stomach, and became loose like the camel of thin back.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/39.htm
    In this next sermon, Ali (رضّى الله عنه) warns the Shia not to become heretics outside the folds of orthodox Islam. And he warns them of their fate if they do this.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 57
    Ali said to his Shia:

    “Storm may overtake you while there may be none to prick you (for reforms). Shall I be witness to my becoming heretic after acceptance of Faith and fighting in the company of the Prophet?! So you should return to your evil places, and get back on the traces of your heels. Beware! Certainly you will meet, after me, overwhelming disgrace and sharp sword and tradition that will be adopted by the oppressors as a norm towards you.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/57.htm
    When Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was fighting Muawiyyah (رضّى الله عنه), he cursed his Shia for being false supporters and cowards. The Shia have always been cowards who have betrayed the Ahlel Bayt consisently.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 68
    Ali admonishes his Shia:

    “How long shall I accord you consideration that is accorded to camels with hollow hump, or to worn clothes which when stitched on one side give way on the other. Whenever a vanguard force of Syria [Muawiyyah’s Syrians] hovers over you, everyone of you shuts his door and hides himself like the lizard in its hole or a badger it its den. By Allah, he whom people like you support must suffer disgrace and he who throws arrows with your support is as if he throws arrows that are broken both at head and tail. By Allah, within the courtyard you are quite numerous but under the banner you are only a few. Certainly, I know what can improve you and how your crookedness can be straightened. But I shall not improve your condition by marring myself. Allah may disgrace your faces and destroy you. You do not understand the right as you understand the wrong and do not crush the wrong as you crush the right.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/68.htm
    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 69
    Ali said about his Shia:

    “I saw the Prophet of Allah appear before me, and I said: ‘O Prophet of Allah! What crookedness and enmity I had to face from my people.’ The prophet of Allah said: Invoke (Allah) to place evil upon them,’ but I said, ‘Allah may change them for me with better ones’”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/69.htm
    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) repudiates the Shia of Iraq for saying that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) shouldn’t go to arbitration with Muawiyyah (رضّى الله عنه). Ali (رضّى الله عنه) declared that Shura is the way, and that he is not divinely appointed by Allah. He condemns the Shia for saying that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was lying when he denied being appointed by Allah.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 70
    Ali said in condemnation of the Shia of Iraq:

    “Now then, O people of Iraq! You are like the pregnant woman who, on completion of the period of pregnancy delivers a dead child and her husband is also dead and her period of widowhood is long while only remote relation inherits her. By Allah, I did not come to you of my own accord. I came to you by force of circumstances. I have come to know that you say ‘Ali speaks a lie.’ May Allah fight you! Against whom do I speak lie? Whether against Allah? But I am the first to have believed in him. Whether against His Prophet? But I am the first who testified to him. Certainly not. By Allah it was a way of expression which you failed to appreciate, and you were not capable of it. Woe to you. I am giving out these measures of nice expression free of any cost. I wish there were vessels good enough to hold them.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/70.htm
    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) said that he feared the oppression of his Shia and their lies against him. And he called the supporters of Abdullah Ibn Saba to be cowards, and he called the Shia to be the worst of supporters.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 96
    Ali said to the Shia of Kufa:

    “People are afraid of the oppression of their rulers while I fear the oppression of my subjects. I called you for war but you did not come. I warned you but you did not listen. I called you secretly as well as openly, but you did not respond. I gave you sincere counsel, but you did not accept it. Are you present like the absent, and slaves like masters? I recite before you points of wisdom but you turn away from them, and I advise you with far reaching advice but you disperse away from it. I rouse you for jihad against the people of revolt but before I come to the end of my speech, I see you disperse like the ike the sons of Saba. You return to your places and deceive one another by your counsel. I straighten you in the morning but you are back to me in the evening as curved as the back of a bow. The sraightener has become weary while those to be straightened have become incorrigible.

    “O those whose bodies are present but wits are absent, and whose wishes are scattered. Their rulers are on trial. Your leader obeys Allah but you disobeyed him while the leader of the people of Syria [Muawiyyah’s men] disobeys Allah but they obey him. By Allah, I wish Muawiyya exchanges with me like Dinars with Dirhams, so that he takes from me ten of you and gives me one from them.

    “O people of Kufa, I have experienced in you three things and two others: you are deaf in spite of having ears, dumb in spite of speaking, and blind in spite of having eyes. You are neither true supporters in combat nor dependable brothers in distress. Your hands may be soiled with earth. O’ examples of those camels whose herdsman has disappeared, if they are collected together from one side they disperse from the other. By Allah, I see you in my imagination that if war becomes intense and action is in full swing you would run away from the son of Abi Talib like the woman who becomes naked in the front.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/96.htm
    Ali (رضّى الله عنه) condemns the Shia for their ideas going astray and for them being heretics. And notice how he says that he wants the Shia to be replaced with the real Muslims.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 115
    Ali says to his Shia:

    “Your ideas went astray and your affairs were dispersed. I do long that Allah may cause separation between me and you and give me those who have a better right to be with me than you.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/115.htm
    And again…

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 118
    Ali says to his Shia:

    “[I] went away from you and would not have sought you so long as North and South differed. There is no benefit in the majority of your numbers because of lack of unity of your hearts”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/118.htm
    And then again…

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 124
    Ali says to his Shia:

    “You are not trustworthy to rely upon, nor are you holders of honor to be adhered to. You are very bad in kindling the fire of fighting. Woe to you! I had to bear a lot of worries from you. Some day I call you and some day I speak to you in confidence, you are neither true free men at the time of call, nor trustworthy brothers at the time of speaking in confidence.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/124.htm
    Again and again…

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 126
    Ali says to his Shia:

    “Certainly you are the most evil of all persons and are those whom Satan has put on his lines and thrown out into his wayless land.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/126.htm
    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 130
    Ali says to his Shia:

    “O people of differing minds and divided hearts, whose bodies are present but wits are absent. I am leading you (amicably) towards truthfulness, but you run away from it like goats and sheep running away from the howling of a lion. How hard it is for me to uncover for you the secrets of justice, or to straighten the curve of truthfulness.”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/130.htm
    The next of Ali’s sermons (رضّى الله عنه) very nicely discusses how the Shia will separate from him and Ali (رضّى الله عنه) will have nothing to do with the Shia.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 179
    Ali says to his Shia:

    “For you there is either death or disgrace. By Allah, if my day of death comes, and it is sure to come, it will cause separation between me and you although I am sick of your company and feel lonely with you. May Allah deal with you! Is there no religion which may unite you nor sense of shamefulness that may sharpen you? Is it not strange that Muawiyya calls out to some rude low people and they follow him without any support or grant, but when I call you, although you are the successors of Islam and the (worthy) survivors of the people, with support and distributed grants you scatter away from me and oppose me? Truly, there is nothing between me to you which I like”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/179.htm
    And perhaps the best of all to summarize with, Ali (رضّى الله عنه) says that the people have sinned by splitting up into Shias (sects), and that they have left Islam and instead gone back to the pagan Beduin ways. He tells the Shia that they will dishonor Islam by breaking the pledge of brotherhood with the Muslim Ummah and insulting the pioneers of Islam.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 191
    Ali says to his Shia:

    “You should know that you have again reverted to the position of the [pagan] Bedouin Arabs after immigration to Islam, and have become different Shias after having been once united. You do not possess anything of Islam except its name, and know nothing of belief save its show. You would throw down Islam on its face in order to defame its honor and break its pledge for brotherhood which Allah gave you as a sacred trust on His earth and a source of peace among the people. Be sure that if you incline towards anything other than Islam. the unbelievers will fight you. Then there will be neither Gabriel nor Michael, neither Muhajirun nor Ansar to help you, but only the clashing of swords, till Allah settles the matter for you…You have broken the shackles of Islam, have transgressed its limits, and have destroyed its commands!”

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/nahjul/191.htm

  • guest

    Shit Websites and Books Confirm that it was Shia who Killed Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), and Hussain’s Grandson (رضّى الله عنه) – How can that even be possible and Why did Shits killed them !? Strange after killing them they cry, beat themselves, do matam, take out processions, blame Sunnis,… Do they do all that because of their own guilt of killing them !?

    The Shia propagandists feel the heat when the Sunnis remind them that it was the Shia of Kufa who betrayed Hussain, and that it was this betrayal that led him to his death. To counter this, Shias starts defending Shi’ism by claiming that the Kuffans were not really Shia. The basic premise of Shias claim that while the Kuffans were called “Shia”, they were not the Shia’t Ali but rather the Shia’t Umar, Shia’t Uthman, or the Shia’t Muawiyyah. Anything other than the Shia’t Ali.

    However, this is a ridicolous interpretation of history, and no historian would claim that Kuffans were anyone other than the Shia’t Ali. But let us provide you with a historical source that the Shia considers authoratative. I kindly refer the reader to “The Origins and Early Development of Shi’a Islam” by SHM Jafri. Establishing this book’s authenticity in the eyes of the Shia is not difficult since it is available on Al-Islam.org, the most reliable Shia website on the internet. The book may be found here: http://al-islam.org/index.php?sid=729406346&t=sub_pages_74&cat=74

    The book “The Origins and Early Development of Shi’a Islam” by SHM Jafri is so authoratative that it is endorsed by the Iranian government. The book is published in Qum with the blessing of the highest scholars (Maraje’) in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Please go to this Shia website http://www.karbala-najaf.org/shiaism/shiaism.html and scroll down to the bottom to confirm this.

    It is also available on Al-Shia.com; you can view this here:
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/history/origins-development-shia-islam/

    Al-Islam.org praised the book:

    Al-Islam.org says
    “For a good source on the effect that Imam Husayn’s sacrifices had on the minds of the Muslims, see: Jafri, The Origins and early Development of Shi’a Islam.
    With salaams and du’as

    Liyakatali Takim

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/AalimNetwork/msg00706.html

    Let us now look at Chapter 5 of this book which is entitled “Kufa: Stage of Shi’i Activities”.

    When we read this chapter, it clearly refers to these individuals as Shia, and followers of Shia Islam. It is not possible to interpret it any other way. This is definitive proof against the Shias.

    Al-Shia.com says
    “The Origins and Early Development of Shi`a Islam
    S.H.M.Jafri

    Chapter 5

    Kufa: Stage of Shi`i Activities

    From the time `Ali moved to Kufa in 36/656, or even earlier, the city became the main centre of Shi`i movements, aspirations, hopes, and sometimes concerted efforts. It was in and around Kufa that so many of the stormy events which make up the early history of Shi’i Islam took place:

    events such as the mobilization of forces by `Ali for the battles of Al-Jamal and Siffin the election and abdication of Hasan, the uprising of Hujr b. `Adi al-Kindi, the massacre of Husayn and his companions, the movement of the Tawwabun, and the revolt of Mukhtar.

    Yet Kufa also proved to be a source of setbacks, disappointments, frustrations, and even treachery and failure in the Shi`i desire to see the house of `Ali in command of the affairs of the Muslim community.

    This chapter, therefore, endeavours to examine in brief the nature and composition of the city of Kufa and the characteristic tendencies of its people.

    source:
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/history/origins-development-shia-islam/

    SHM Jafri, the well-reputed Shia scholar and historian, declares that Kufa became the “center of the Shia movement” and characterized the “history of Shia Islam”. Is there any doubt now which Shia we are talking about here? The clear distinction is made that it is Shia Islam, and not Sunni Islam. Therefore, how can Shias claim that these were Shia’t of anyone other than Ali?

    Shias has tried very hard to deny the fact that it was the Shia’t Ali who betrayed Hussain, but here we read that SMH Jafri says “treachery and failure in the Shi`i desire to see the house of Ali in command of the affairs of the Muslim community.” Clearly, the treachoury is from people who had a desire to see the house of Ali in power. Therefore, it is painfully obvious that we are talking about the Shia here (yes, those Shia).

    Shias says
    “Kufa was a city that was founded by the second khalifa, Arab tribes settled there. No doubt they were loyal to him. They deemed him to be the legitimate khalifa, so much so that Umar deemed Kufa to be the head of Islam…The Kufan Arabs accepted the concept of khilafath that had been established at Saqifa, and expanded by Hadhrath Umar. The Kufans were those that deemed Ali (as) to be the fourth khailfa, which is not the belief espoused by the Shi’a who deem him (as) to be the rightful khalifa after Rasulullah (s).

    Yes, Kufa was definitely founded by Caliph Umar bin Khattab who also adored the city. But this was in 638 AD. After many years, there was a great influx of the Shia’t Ali into Kufa, many of whom came with Ali himself. By 656 AD, Kufa had become the center of the Shia movement. This is recorded in the same Shia historical text written by SHM Jafri.

    Al-Shia.com says
    “The Origins and Early Development of Shi`a Islam
    S.H.M.Jafri

    Chapter 5

    Kufa: Stage of Shi`i Activities

    The city of Kufa was founded in the year 17/638, about three years after `Umar b. al-Khattab assumed the caliphate at Medina…

    …It is against this background that the third and most critical phase of Kufan history began. The first phase had seen the city’s foundation in 17/638 and extended until the death of ‘Umar in 24/644; the second ended with the death of’`Uthman in 35/655; this ushered in the third phase, which was dominated by the rise of `Ali to the caliphate in the same year…

    The Kufan contingent was the first to pay homage to `Ali under the leadership of Malik al-Ashtar…’Ali was thus left with no choice but to leave Medina for Iraq and count on the support of the Kufans, who had shown their inclinations towards him…

    When ‘Ali came to Kufa, there was another influx of newcomers to the city, those who came with ‘Ali himself, and he treated them with equality irrespective of their early domicile…

    He arrived in the neighbourhood of Kufa with about 1,000 men who accompanied him from Medina, and was readily joined by about 12,000 Kufans….

    They formed the main part of his army at the battle of Al-Jamal. The Meccan-Basran alliance was defeated, and ‘Ali was able to bring Basra well under his control and appointed ‘Abd Allah b. ‘Abb~s as his governor.

    ‘Ali then entered Kufa, not to make it his capital, but only to mobilize further support and organize the Kufans for another much more serious encounter with Mu’awiya…

    In order to consolidate his power in Kufa, ‘All had to establish a purely Islamic socio-political system…Leaders such as Al-Ashtar, Hujr, and `Adi, together with their following,
    especially from the newcomers of their tribes, formed the backbone of `Ali’s supporters and were the nucleus of the Shi`i of Kufa.

    …From the time `Ali moved to Kufa in 36/656, or even earlier, the city became the main centre of Shi`i movements, aspirations, hopes, and sometimes concerted efforts.

    source:
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/history/origins-development-shia-islam/”

    There should thus be no doubt that the city of Kufa went through various phases, and the fourth phase–according to SHM Jafri–was the establishment of the Shia movement in Kufa. Therefore, Shia showing us that Umar bin Khattab founded the city or that the Kuffans supported the first three Caliphs is all extraneous and we already accept this as a fact. It was during the time of Uthman’s assassination that Abdullah ibn Saba’s followers began their propaganda in Kufa. Thereafter the beliefs of the Kuffans would shift from the mainstream and many would adopt the Saba’ite beliefs which are the basis of the modern day Shia followers.

    Letters to Hussain

    Shias has tried to imply that it was the Sunnis who sent letters to Hussain to come to Kufa and that they would support him once he got there. However, the truth is that it was the Shia of Kufa who sent him letters asking him to come to Kufa.

    Al-Shia.com says
    “The Origins and Early Development of Shi`a Islam
    S.H.M.Jafri

    Chapter 7

    The Martyrdom of Husayn

    This was emphasized by the leaders of the movement when they wrote:
    “In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate; to al-Husayn b. ‘Ali, from his Shi`a, the faithful Muslims: Further make haste, for the people are awaiting you, as they have no Imam other than you! So haste, and again haste! Peace.”

    This last letter was signed by a number of people and was sent with a delegation consisting of Hani b. Hani as-Sabi’i and Sa’id b. ‘Abd Allah al-Hanafi, the two most trusted Shi`is of Kufa.

    source:
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/history/origins-development-shia-islam/”

    In fact, SHM Jaffri recounts so many different letters written by prominent Shia of Kufa that I think the reader should just read this chapter for himself: http://www.karbala-najaf.org/shiaism/174-221.htm Clearly, we see after reading this, that it was the Shia of Kufa who enticed Hussain to leave his safety in Mecca and come to Kufa instead.

    The Tawwabun

    There can be no doubt that the Tawwabun were the penitent Shia of Kufa. The Shias has tried to claim that these were actually Sunnis. However, the truth is that the predominant element in the Tawwabun were radicalized Shia many of whom had Saba’ite-oriented beliefs. We again use as proof SHM Jafri’s book, in which he clearly says that the Tawwabun helped consolidate Shia Islam:

    Al-Shia.com says
    “The Origins and Early Development of Shi`a Islam
    S.H.M.Jafri

    Chapter 8

    The Reaction after Karbala

    The martyrdom of Husayn was of great religious significance and had a deep heart-searching after-effect upon the Shi’is, giving a new turn to the mode and nature of the Shi’i movement.

    The tragic fate of the grandson of the Prophet stirred religious and moral sentiments, particularly among those of the Kufan followers of the House of the Prophet who had so zealously asked Husayn to come to Iraq to guide them on what they considered to be the path of God. But when Husayn came to Iraq they did not or could not stand with him in the hour of trial.

    Soon afterwards, however, they realized that their inability, or rather weakness, had been the cause of the tragedy. A deep sense of repentance set in, provoking their religious conscience; and in order to expiate their negligence and obtain God’s forgiveness, they thought they must make similar sacrifices. They believed that they could only prove their real repentance by exposing themselves to death while seeking vengeance for the blood of Husayn.

    Hence they named themselves the Tawwabun (penitents) and are known in Islamic history by this self-imposed title. This movement, as will be seen below, proved to be an important step forward in the consolidation of Shi’i Islam.

    source:
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/history/origins-development-shia-islam/

    In a desperate attempt to deny that the Tawwabun were Shia, they made the following argument:

    “The Sahabi Sulayman bin Surad and al Mussayab bin Najabah led the Tawabun

    Shias are trying to say that the Tawwabun were led by Sunnis. But there can be no doubt that Sulayman bin Surad is considered a staunch Shia, according to the Shia themselves. In fact, he is called “Shaikh as-Shia” (the Shaikh of all Shias). Mussayab bin Najabah was also a Shia. SHM Jafri makes this abundantly clear in his book:

    Al-Shia.com says
    “The Origins and Early Development of Shi`a Islam
    S.H.M.Jafri

    Chapter 8

    The Reaction after Karbala

    The (Tawwabun) movement began under the leadership of five of the oldest and most trusted associates of ‘Ali, with a following of a hundred diehard and devoted Shi’is of Kufa, none of whom was below sixty years of age.

    This age factor should particularly be noted, as it indicates the maturity of their religious thinking and behaviour. The five leaders of the movement:

    1. Sulayman b. Surad al-Khuza`i,
    2. Al-Musayyab b. Najaba al-Fazari;
    3. `Abd Allah b. Sa`d b. Nufayl al-Azdi
    4. Abd Allah b. Walin at-Tami,
    5. Rifa`a b. Shaddad al-Bajali)

    had always been in the forefront of all Shi’i activities in Kufa, and were highly respected by the Shi’a for their sincerity of purpose and unshaken devotion to the cause of the Ahl al-Bayt.

    Similarly, the other hundred who joined these leaders of the movement are described as “the most select from among the followers of ‘Ali”. Towards the end of 61/680 they held their first meeting in the house of Sulayman b. Surad….

    Rifa`a b. Shaddad al-Bajali, another senior member of the five leaders, then spoke, appealing passionately to the religious sentiments of those present. After emphasizing further what Al-Musayyab had said, he proposed:

    “Let us give command of our affairs to Shaykh ash-Shi`a, the companion of the Prophet, possessor of priority in Islam, Sulayman b. Surad, the one praised for his intrepidity and for his religion and the one who has been dependable and reliable in his judiciousness and prudence (Hazm).”

    The other three leaders named above spoke in the same vein and seconded the proposal to choose Sulayman as their leader on the same grounds as mentioned by Rifa`a. It is important to note that the qualifications for the leadership of the movement, which was indeed dedicated to the Shi’i cause, were companionship with the Prophet and priority or precedence in Islam (sabiqa).

    This, like many other instances, means that the main emphasis of the Shi’is was to enforce the Islamic ideal, which they thought could only be achieved through the Ahl al-Bayt, the people nearest to the Prophet.

    Sulayman b. Surad, accepting the responsibility of leading the movement, made a forceful speech in which he laid down the severest standards required of those who wanted to participate and emphasized that they should be ready to sacrifice their lives for the noblest task ahead of them.

    …Circumstances took a sudden turn in favour of the movement with the unexpected death of Yazid in 64/683, encouraging the Tawwabun to come out in the open. Some of the leading members urged Sulayman to rise publicly, Oust `Amr b. Hurayth, deputy of ‘Abd Allah b. Ziyad, from the city, pursue those responsible for the blood of Husayn, and call the people to support the Ahl al-Bayt.

    …They said that they would follow only Shaykh ash-Shia Sulayman b. Surad

    source:
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/history/origins-development-shia-islam/
    It therefore abundantly clear that Sulayman bin Surad and Mussayab bin Najabah were Shia, according to the Shia scholarship. Therefore, Shias attempts to pass them off as Sunni is sophomoric at best. The Tawwabun movement was clearly a Shia movement with Shia ideals. In fact, SHM Jafri clearly says just this, that the Tawwabun movement possessed the ideals of Shi’ism.

    “The Origins and Early Development of Shi`a Islam
    S.H.M.Jafri

    Chapter 8

    The Reaction after Karbala

    In all the preceding chapters dealing with the developments from the time of the death of the Prophet till the death of Husayn, the Shi’i doctrinal stand and their religio-political aspirations have repeatedly been pointed out…mission was the same as that of the Tawwabun insofar as the revenge for the blood of Husayn and establishing the rights of the Ahl al-Bayt…

    source:
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/history/origins-development-shia-islam/
    The Tawwabun were definitely Shia because they believed in the concept of Imamah which is distinct to the Shia faith.

    Al-Shia.com says
    “The Origins and Early Development of Shi`a Islam
    S.H.M.Jafri

    Chapter 8

    The Reaction after Karbala

    there are strong indications that they [the Tawwabun] believed that the rightful Imam was now Husayn’s surviving son ‘Ali, later known as Zayn al-’Abidin. There are many factors that support this view.

    source:
    http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/history/origins-development-shia-islam/

    To completely end the debate about wether or not the Tawwabun were Shia, let us refer you to Al-Islam.org which categorically declares that they were indeed Shia movements.

    Al-Islam.org says
    “Question: how did Islam change for the majority of the Muslims, did they still follow Yazid and his companions, or did they realize that Imam Hussain(A.S) was the true calipha?
    Answer:

    …There were 2 main revolts which challenged the Umayyad regime soon after the events in Kerbala – the Tawwabun movement led by Sulayman b. Surad and Mukhtar’s revolt against those who had perpetrated the crimes in Kerbala

    source: http://www.al-islam.org/organizations/AalimNetwork/msg00706.html

    Conclusion

    The bottom line is that it was the Shia who pledged support to Hussain, which caused him to leave Mecca for Kufa. At the last minute, the Shia of Kufa betrayed Hussain and allowed Yezid’s men (who were much fewer in number than the Kuffans) to attack and defeat Hussain’s contingent. The ceremony of Matam can be traced to the Tawwabun, who were the penitent Shia who felt guilty for leading their Imam to his imminent death. This, my friends, is the illustrious history of the Shia.

    The Shia comemmorate the Day of Ashura with great fanfare. What is strange is that although they spend so much energy and passion in taking out parades of people who do Matam, few Shia actually spend time to investigate what is the origin of the Shia rituals of Matam. A simple investigation in the origins of this ritual will shock the Shia.

    The Shia Rituals of Ashura

    Firstly, the Shia do not realize that it was the Shia themselves who were responsible for the death of Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). Furthermore, the Shia of today don’t realize that the rituals that they do during Ashura were invented by the very people who were responsible for the murder of Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). Ashura is probably the most important day of the year for the Shia, much like Christmas is for the Christian. If the Shia minions actually stopped to reflect on the origins of this Shia “holiday”, they would realize the baseness of their entire religion which is based on the very antithesis of the very group (i.e. Ahlel Bayt) that they claim to follow.

    The Story of Karbala

    During his Caliphate, Ali (رضّى الله عنه) shifted the Caliphate from Medinah to Kufa in Iraq. The Kuffans were staunch Partisans of Ali (Shia’t Ali). The Jew Abdullah Ibn Saba found the Kuffans to be very receptive to his claims that Ali was divinely appointed by Allah, and his followers became the Saba’ites. When the Shia’t Ali met the Shia’t Muawiyyah on the battlefield, Muawiyyah (رضّى الله عنه) convinced Ali (رضّى الله عنه) to hold a cease-fire and to use arbitration to decide who will be the Caliph. Ali (رضّى الله عنه) agreed to arbitration. This angered the Kuffan Saba’ites because they held the erroneous belief that Ali had been divinely appointed by Allah, so they believed that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was going against the will of Allah by agreeing to arbitration. In their minds, there could be no negotiation on a matter that was decreed by Allah. Some of these Kuffan Saba’ites rebelled against Ali (رضّى الله عنه), turning on him and calling him an apostate. These people would be known as Kharajites, and they would eventually assasinate their leader Ali (رضّى الله عنه), the same leader they had once claimed so much love for.

    As for the remaining Kuffan Shias who did not become Kharajites, they would later join the forces of Hasan (رضّى الله عنه). However, Hasan (رضّى الله عنه) did not trust these Shia as they were very disloyal. In his book al-Ihtijâj, the prominent Shia author Abu Mansur at-Tabarsi has preserved the following remark of Hasan (رضّى الله عنه):

    “By Allah, I think Muawiyyah would be better for me than these people who claim that they are my Shia.” [Abû Mansûr at-Tabarsî, al-Ihtijâj vol. 2 p. 290-291 , Mu’assasat al-A‘lamî, Beirut 1989]

    Distrusting his Shia, Hasan (رضّى الله عنه) made peace with Muawiyyah (رضّى الله عنه) and gave him the Caliphate, so long as Muawiyyah (رضّى الله عنه) promised that Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) would be made Caliph after Muawiyyah’s death (رضّى الله عنه). Hussain’s Shia protested at this, and Hasan (رضّى الله عنه)’s reply is preserved in the most important of the Shia books of Hadith, Al-Kafi:

    “By Allah, I handed over power to him for no reason other than the fact that I could not find any supporters. Had I found supporters I would have fought him day and night until Allah decides between us. But I know the people of Kufa. I have experience of them. The bad ones of them are no good to me. They have no loyalty, nor any integrity in word or deed. They are in disagreement. They claim that their hearts are with us, but their swords are drawn against us.” [Al-Kafi, vol. 8 p. 288]

    After this reconciliation took place between Hasan (رضّى الله عنه) and Muawiyyah (رضّى الله عنه), the Shia’t Ali remained in Kufa. After the death of Ali (رضّى الله عنه), the ranks of the Saba’ites and their sympathizers amongst the Shia’t Ali increased.

    When Muawiyyah (رضّى الله عنه) ded, however, his son Yezid declared himself the new Caliph, in violation of the agreement settled with Hasan (رضّى الله عنه) which stated that Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) would be Caliph. This angered the Shias of Kufa. So it was that in Ramadan 60 A.H. that the Kuffans sent letter after letter from Kufa to Mecca where Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) was staying after his flight from Medinah. The Kuffans assured Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) of their loyalty and allegiance to him; they had not accepted Yezid as leader whom they resented. On certain days, there would be as many as 600 letters accompanied by messengers describing the overwhelming support of Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) in Kufa.

    Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) decided to send his cousin Muslim Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) to investigate the situation in Kufa. Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) arrived in Dhul Qada where he stayed with Ibn Awsajah al-Asadi. The Kuffans met Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) and pledged the support of 12,000 Shia’t Ali of Kufa. They promised to fight with and to protect Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) with their lives and all they possessed. When the number who pledged support rose to 18,000 Kufans, Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) felt confident enough to dispatch a messenger to Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) informing him of the bayat (oath of allegiance) of the Kuffans, and urged him to proceed from Mecca and relocate his base to Kufa. So Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) and his near ones began the trek to Kufa.

    Rumors of what was happening in Kufa soon reached Yezid in Damascus. He dispatched Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad with 17 men to find Muslim Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) and kill him. When Ubaydullah arrived in Kufa, Muslim Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) called the Kuffans to defend him. It was at this moment of need that the Shia of Kufa deserted Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه), fearful of Ubaydullah’s threats. Muslim Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) hid from Ubaydullah in the house of an old woman. The old woman’s son, a part of the Shia’t Ali, notified Ubaydullah of Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه)’s location, hopeful that this act would prevent Yezid from punishing Kufa. Based on this act of treachory, the Shia’t Ali left Muslim Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) to be captured by Ubaydullah.

    Later that day–the Day of Arafah, the 9th of Dhul Hijjah–Muslim ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه) was taken up to the highest ramparts of the fort. His last words before being executed were:

    “O Allah, You be the Judge between us and our people; they deceived us and deserted us.”

    The Shia of Kufa witnessed his execution, and not a single one of them went to the aid of Hussain’s cousin. It is important to remember that only 17 men were with Ubaydullah, whereas there were 18,000 Shia of Kufa who had pledged Bayat to Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) in front of Muslim Ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه). How could it be that 18,000 men could not stop 17 men from slaughtering the very man they had just pledged support to? Such was the treachory of the Shia of Kufa.

    Meanwhile, Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) had dispatched a mesenger by the name of Qais ibn Mushir to inform the Kuffans of Hussain (رضّى الله عنه)’s arrival. The messenger was captured by Ubaydullah, who ordered him to mount the walls of the fort and publically curse Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) and his father. Instead, Qais ibn Mushir praised Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), telling the Shia of Kufa that Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) was on his way, and he exhorted them to defend him. Upon that, Qais ibn Mushir was executed. Yet another representative of Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) had been killed by 18 men who met no ressistance from the 18,000 Shia of Kufa. A ratio of 1,000 Kufans to each of Yezid’s men.

    Yezid thereupon dispatched 4,000 soldiers to intercept Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). These 4,000 soldiers were actually on their way to fight the Daylamites, but Yezid re-routed them to Karbala. These 4,000 soldiers passed through Kufa. The Kuffans witnessed the departure of this force from Kufa with their own eyes, full well knowing they were headed to Karbala to intercept Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). This would be the Kuffans’ last chance to honor the oaths of allegiance to Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) which they had taken upon the hands of his cousin Muslim ibn Aqil (رضّى الله عنه). This was the final opportunity to rush to the side of the grandson of the Prophet and protect the Ahlel Bayt. It was after all the invitations and assurances of support from the Shia of Kufa that encouraged Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) to abandon the safety of Mecca for Kufa. But once again faithfulness, courage and commitment was found lacking in the Shia of Kufa. Only a handful emerged to join Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) at Karbala. Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) would comment:

    “Our Shia have deserted us.”

    The Shia of Kufa outnumbered Yezid’s men 18,000 to 4,000. Actually, the number was greater than 18,000; 18,000 was simply the number of men who had pledged Bayat (oath of allegiance) to protect Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). Had they wanted to, the Shia of Kufa could have defeated Yezid’s men and protected Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). But instead, they did nothing but watch from afar with cowardice. The Shia of today will eulogize this day and talk about how 71 men fought against 4,000 of Yezid’s troops. Where did the other 18,000 go?

    Al-Tawwabun (The Penitents)

    Four years after the massacre of Karbala, the Shia of Kufa attempted to make ammends for their desertion of Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). They called themselves the Al-Tawwabun, which translates to “the Penitents.” This group went to Karbala to comemmorate Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), and here it was that they began Matam, with loud mourning, lamenting, and self-flagellation. These Tawwabun hit themselves to punish themselves for the cowardice that they had shown that led to their Imam’s death just four years earlier. This is the origin of the Shia ritual of Matam. It is altogether amusing how the Shia never really wonder where this barbaric custom started from or why it started in the first place. Little do they know that it is a testament to this day of how they killed their own Imam, and how their whole religion is centered around a false commitment to the Ahlel Bayt.

    One More Act of Shia Treachoury

    Karbala was not to be the last act of treason by the Shia against the Ahlel Bayt. Sixty year later, the grandson of Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), namely Zayd ibn Ali ibn Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), led an uprising against the Umayyad ruler Hisham ibn Abd al-Malik. Zayd رضّى الله عنه) recieved the Bayat (oath of allegiance) of over 40,000 men, of which 15,000 were from the same Kufa that deserted his grandfather. Just before the battle started, all but a few hundred men deserted Zayd (رضّى الله عنه) en masse. On the departure of the defectors, Zayd (رضّى الله عنه) remarked:

    “I am afraid they have done unto me as they did to Hussain (رضّى الله عنه).”

    Zayd (رضّى الله عنه) and his little army fought bravely and attained martyrdom. Thus, on Wednesday the 1st of Safar 122 AH, another member of the Ahlel Bayt fell victim to the treachery of the Shia of Kufa.

    Conclusion

    To this day, the Shia still commemorate Ashura by doing Matam (self-flagellation). This ritual was passed down the generations by the Al-Tawwabun (the Penitents) showing us that the Shia of today originate from the same Shia of Kufa who betrayed Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). The very reason that the Shia beat themselves is to punish themselves for this betrayal of the Ahlel Bayt.

    The Shia betrayed Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), and Zayd ibn Ali ibn Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). The irony is not lost that the Shia claim to be lovers of the Ahlel Bayt and yet historically they have betrayed them and lead to the deaths of Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), and Hussain’s grandson (رضّى الله عنه).

  • guest

    Shi’ite Beliefs from Shi’ite Sources: Unloaded

    An Exposition to the fallacy of Shi’ite beliefs from their own sources

    By Allamah Khalid Mahmood

    Q – Who is the Grand Mother of Imam Jafar Sadiq?
    A – She is the Grand Daughter of Hazrat Abubakr Siddique. Her name is Asma and name of her daughter is Umme Farwah.

    Q – Who is the Grand Father of Imam Jafar Sadiq?
    A – He is the Grand son of Hazrat Ali and his name is Imam Zainul Abedeen.

    Both these lines are highly respectable.

    The Beliefs of the Shi’ites about the Present Quran:

    Jabir reported that he heard Imam Baqir saying: ‘No one can claim that he has compiled the Quran as Allah revealed except a liar. The only person to compile it and memorise it according to its revelation was Ali ibn Abi Talib and the Imams who succeeded him. (Usul Kafi: 1:228)

    A man said that someone was reciting the Quran in the company of Imam Ja’far. The narrator said that he heard certain verses in the recitation which were not according to the recitation of the people. Imam Ja’far told the person reciting: ‘Do not recite like this. Recite as the people recite until the (promised) Mahdi arrives. When the Mahdi arrives, he will recite the Quran according to its original revelation and the Qu,ran compiled by Ali will be brought forward. (Ibid: 2.622)

    Allah says in Surah Ale Imraan (32):
    “Certainly Allah has chosen Adam, Noah, the family of Abraham and the family of Imraan above the (families of the) worlds.”

    Allamah Ali ibn Ibrahim AI-Qummi – one of the early Shi’ite commentators of the Quran said concerning this verse:

    ‘The Imam said: ‘The words: “The family of Muhammed” were also revealed along with “the family of Ale Imraan.” They (referring to the Companions of the Prophet S.A.W.) removed the words “The family of Muhammad” from the original text (Al-Qummi’s commentary:308). The allegation of removing the words preempts any possibility of abrogation. It is clear that the commentary is accusing the Companions of the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) of distorting the Quran.

    Allah says in Surah Taha (115):
    “And We had given Adam an order before, but he forgot and We did not find any resolve in him (to disobey the order).”

    Imam Ja’far is reported to have said that Allah had revealed this verse with the following words:

    “We had ordered Adam before with some words about Muhammad, Ali, Fatima, Hassan, Hussain and the Imams from their offspring but he (Adam) forgot.” Ja’far said: ‘By Allah, these were the words which were revealed to Muhammad.’ (Usul Kafi: 1:416 and the footnotes of Maqbool’s translation: 637)

    Allah says in Surah Yusuf (49):
    “Then a year will come in which people will be given abundant help and they will press grapes.” In AI-Qummi’s commentary it is reported from Imam Ja’far that someone recited this verse in the presence of Ali. Ali said: ‘What will they press’? Wine?’ The person asked how he should read the verse. Ali replied that the verse was revealed thus: “Then a year will come in which people will he given abundant help and in which they will be given abundant rain. (Al-Qummi’s commentary: 192)

    The word Ya’siroon in the present Quran is in the active voice. According to this commentary it should have been read in the passive voice as Yu’saroon to alter the meaning. In the footnotes to the translation of Maqbool, it is written that this word (Ya’siroon) was changed from the passive voice to the active to suit the fancies of wine-loving khulafa (rulers). (Maqbool’s translation: 479)

    Allah says in Surah Muhammad (9):
    “That is because they resented what Allah revealed, so Allah in turn cancelled their deeds.” AI-Qummi has stated that Imam Muhammad Baqir said that Jibreel had transmitted this verse as: ‘That is because they resented what Allah revealed about Ali.’ But then the apostates removed Ali’s name (from the Quran). (Ibid: 1011)

    Allah says in Surah Waqi’ah (29):
    “And the Companions of the Right Hand. What about the Companions of the Right Hand. They shall be among thornless lote-trees and under clusters of bananas.”

    One person recited this verse in the presence of Ali. Ali said that the word Talh is not.appropriate and should read Tal’a as in Surah Shu’araa (………). Some enquired as why the word should not be changed. Ali replied that it was not the right time to do so because correcting the Quran would only confuse common people. He went on to say that among the Imams, only Imam Mahdi will have the right to reintroduce the Quran as it was during the time of the prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam). (Ibid: 1067)

    Abu Mansur Ahmed Tibrisi, a prominent Shi’ite scholar of the 8th century (H), has written:
    ‘Enumerating the distortions and omissions of this sort (from the present Quran) would become laborious and it will disclose what Taqiyyah (Shi’ite practice to conceal the ‘truth’ for religious purposes) requires me not to disclose: the good qualities of Allah’s friends and the vices of His enemies. (AI-Ihtijaj by Tibrisi: 1:254)

    Mullah Muhsin Kashani, an 11th century Shi’ite scholar comments on the above quoted statement:

    ‘It is clear from all of these traditions and quotations from the Family of the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) that the present Quran is not the complete Quran which was revealed to the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam). In fact, there are verses that contradict that which was revealed; verses that have been distorted and places where omissions have been made such as the names of Ali, the Family of Muhammad (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) and, on several occasions, there were the names of the hypocrites. Moreover, the present order of the Quran is not according to the preferred order of Allah and His Messenger. Ali ibn Ibrahim (a renowned commentator) also holds this opinion.’ (Tafseer of Saafi: l:32)

    The Beliefs of the Shi’ites Regarding Prophethood:

    Allah says in Surah Baqarah (26):
    “Certainly Allah does not disdain from giving a parable of a gnat or something larger.”

    Allamah Ali ibn Ibrahim explains that by the word “gnat” Allah refers to Ameerul Mumineen (Ali) and by the words “or something larger” He means the Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam). (AI-Qummi: 19)

    Sheikh Tusi and Nu’mani both narrate from the 8th Imam, Rida, that the sign of Imam Mahdi’s appearance will be that he will appear naked in daylight. An announcer will announce that here is the Ameerul Mumineen himself who has reappeared. Mullah Muhammad Baqir Majlisi says that the first disciple to take pledge at the hands of the nude Mahdi will be Muhammad (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) himself. (Haqqul Yaqeen: 2:337)

    The leader of the Iranian revolution, Imam Khomeini writes:
    ‘Every prophet came to establish justice on Earth. His aim was also to establish justice but he was not successful. The same is the position of the Seal of the Prophets who came to reform human society and establish justice but failed during his lifetime.’ (Ittihad wa-yak-jihati:15)

    Mullah Fathullah Kashani, a reliable Shi’ite scholar writes about Mut’ah:
    The Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) said: ‘Whoever performs mut’ah once will receive the status of Hussain. Who ever performs mut’ah twice will receive the status of Hasan. Whoever performs mut’ah thrice will receive the status of Ali and who ever performs mut’ah four times will receive my status. (Tafseer Manhajul Sadiqeen: 1:356)

    [Mu’tah is to marry someone for a short period of time (temporary marriage). In this marriage, the woman does not hold the status of a wife. Mut’ah is permissible and virtuous in Shi’ite law but forbidden and sinful in Sunni law.]

    Imam Khomeini writes in his book ‘A1Hukumatul Islamiyah’ (52):
    ‘It is a necessary principle of our faith that our Imams have ranks that exceed those of close angels and the appointed messengers.’

    Shi’ite Beliefs with Regards to Ayesha – the Wife of the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam):

    Mullah Baqir Majlisi writes:
    ‘When Imam Mahdi arrives, Ayesha will be resurrected so that she may be given a prescribed punishment and that Fatima be vindicated.’ (Haqqul Yaqeen: 347)

    The same author writes about Ayesha that “She was a traitor.” (Tadhkiratul Aimmah: 66)

    Again, Mullah Baqir Majilisi comments about Ayesha (R.A.) and Hafsa (R.A.) that: “They were both hypocrites.” (Hayatul Quloob: 2:745)
    Imam Khomeini writes about the prestige and worth of the oft-quoted Mullah Baqir:

    ‘Keep on reading the Persian books written by Majlisi so that you do not fall into any other such stupidity.’ (Kashful Asrar: 121)

    Maqbool Dehlavi, a Shi’ite translator of the Quran, quotes Imam Baqir as saying:

    ‘Two women poisoned the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) before his death. These are the same two women (Ayesha and Hafsa). May Allah curse them and their fathers (Abu Bakr and Omar respectively). (His translation of Surah Ale Imraan: 134)

    What the Shi’ites believe about the Companions of the Prophet (Sallallaahu AlayhiWasallam)?

    Mullah Muhammed bin Yaqoob Kulaini, the most prominent Shi’ite scholar of Hadith, quotes Imam Baqir as saying:
    ‘People became apostates after the death of the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam), except for three people: Miqdad ibn Aswad, Abu Dharr Ghifari and Salmaan Farsi.’ He continues:

    Abu Bakr and Omar did not repent before they parted the world. In fact, they did not even mention what they had done to Ali. So may Allah, His angels and all of mankind curse them. (Furu’ul Kafi: Kitabul Rauda: 115)

    Mullah Baqir writes:
    ‘Regarding the doctrine of’ ‘Tabarri’ we believe that we should seek disassociation from four idols namely, Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman and Mu’awiyah; from four women namely, Ayesha, Hafsa, Hind and Ummul Hakam, along with all their associates and followers. ‘These are the worst creation of Allah. It is not possible to believe in Allah, His Messenger and the Imams without disassociating oneself from their enemies. (Haqqul Yaqeen: 2:519)

    [The doctrine of ‘Tabarri’ means to have no association with the enemies of Allah.]

    Mullah Baqir writes:
    ‘One should say after each prayer: O Allah! Curse Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman, Mu’awiyah, Ayesha, Hafsa, Hind and Ummul Hakam. (Aynul Hayat: 599)

    The Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam), came to a person from the Ansaar and asked him if he had any food. The Ansaari said he had and slaughtered a goat. The man then grilled some meat and presented it to the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) who wished that Ali, Fathima, Hasan and Hussain were present with him. Then Abu Bakr and Omar arrived. Ali also arrived shortly after. Allah then revealed the verse:
    ‘We have never sent any messenger prophet or Muhaddath before except that when ever they desired something, the devil interfered in their desire.’ (The Prophet then said) This is just as the devil has sent his two agents here right now (Abu Bakr and Omar). (The footnotes of Maqbool’s translation: Surah Hajj: 674)

    [Muhaddath is a non-prophet but he is inspired by Allah]

    Mullah Baqir Majlisi writes:
    ‘Pharaoh and Hamaan refer here to Abu Bakr and Omar. (Haqqul Yaqeen: 342)

    The same author also says:
    ‘The references in big books about the illegitimate birth of Omar cannot be discussed in this book. (Ibid: 259)

    Allah says in Surah Nahl (90):
    “And He prevents you from immorality, unlawfulness and rebellion.’

    Ali ibn Ibrahim AI-Qummi comments on this verse:
    ‘These three vices refer to so and so, so and so and so and so.’ (Al Qummi’s commentary: 218)

    Any ambiguity is cleared by the following comment: ‘Immorality refers to the first person (Abu Bakr); unlawfulness refers to the second (Omar) and rebellion refers to the third (Uthman). (Footnotes to Maqbool’s translation: 522)

    Mullah Baqir narrates a story from Imam Zainul Abideen that a man came to the Imam and asked him to inform him about Abu Bakr and Omar. The Imam informed him that they were both non-believers. (Haqqul Yaqeen: 551)

    The Shi’ites Belief Regarding the family of The Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam):

    Mullah Baqir Majlisi writes: ‘Fatima (R.A.) described Ali (R.A.) thus:
    “You are hiding like a malformed foetus in a womb; you have ran home like those who are guilty of being untrustworthy and after having destroyed the strongest men on earth you have been overcome by these wimps.” (Ibid: 203)

    Mullah Baqir also writes:
    After hearing some women talking about Ali (R.A.) Fatima (R.A.) complained about her husband’s features:
    “He is a man with a big stomach. His hands are high and his bones look suppressed. He has a receding hair line, big eyes and shows his teeth all the time. He has no wealth either. (Jilalul Uyoon: 58, in the chapter on Fatima)

    The very same Mullah Baqir comments about a dream that Fatima had and establishes that the devil came to her:
    ‘The dream Fatima had was from a devil whose name is Uhaad. (Ibid: 52)

    The renowned Shi’ite scholar Abu Mansur Ahmed Tibrisi writes:
    ‘Abu Bakr sent Qunfudh to Ali with a delegation who entered Ali’s house without his permission. Ali went for his sword but the group had already taken it away. They captured Ali and tied a rope round his neck. When Fatima tried to intervene, Qunfudh hit her. The delegation dragged Ali to Abu Bakr where Omar, Khalid bin Walid and Abu Ubaidah ibn Jarrah (R.A.) were also present with many other people. Omar severely reprimanded Ali and told him to swear allegiance with Abu Bakr. Ali then took Abu Bakr’s hand and took an oath of allegiance. (Al-Ihtijaj, by Tibrisi: 83, 84)

    Mullah Baqir narrates Fatima’s displeasure with regards to Ali’s attitude about her in the words of Ali:
    “Jibreel came to the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) and said “Allah sends His Salaam upon you and says that Fatima is about to come and complain about Ali. Do not listen to anything about Ali from Fatima.”

    When Fatima came, the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) asked her if she came to complain about Ali. She replied that she had. The Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) said: “By the Lord of the Ka’bah! Go back to Ali and tell him that you are prepared to rub your nose in dust in order to keep him happy. You may do as you please.” (Jailul ‘Uyoon: 61)

    What is the Shi’ites belief about the Ahlus Sunnah Wa’l Jama’ah?

    Muhammad ibn Yacoob Kulaini, the most prominent of all Shi’ite scholars of Hadith quotes Imam Baqir as saying:
    “Everybody, except us Shi’ites, are illegitimate.” (Furoo’u Kafi in Kitabul Raudah: 135)

    Mullah Baqir writes:
    “When Imam Mahdi appears, he will start to execute the Sunni scholars before turning to the non-believers.” Similar words of this hadith has also been quoted in the tafseer Majma’ul Bayan with reference to the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam). (Haqqul Yaqeen: 2:527)

    Mullah Baqir quotes Imam Zainul Abideen:
    A person asked the Imam about Abu Bakr and Omar.

    The Imam replied: “I have been informed that they were both non-believers and any one who befriends them (by thinking they are good) are also non-believers.” (Ibid: 2:522)

    The same author quotes Imam Ali-ul-Naqi:
    Imam Ali-ul-Naqi was asked about identifying the Nasibi group (those who prefer Abu Bakr and Omar over Ali): whether it was sufficient to know that they (the Nasibis) preferred Abu Bakr and Omar over Ali and that they held the Imamate of Abu Bakr and Omar in good standing. T’he Imam replied that whoever believed this was a Nasibi. (Ibid: 521)

    Again, Mullah Baqir writes about these Nasibis:
    The Nasibi (one who prefers Abu Bakr and Omar over Ali) is worse than an illegitimate person. It is true that Allah has not created anything more despicable than dogs. But the Nasibi is even more degenerate in the Eyes of Allah than a dog. (Ibid: 2:516)

    Tbe Beliefs of Allamah Khomeni, the Leader of the Iranian Revolution:

    Nuri Tibiris, one of the most renowned Shi’ite scholars and mujtahids, wrote a book against the present Quran. The book is entitled: ‘Faslul Khitab Fi Tahreefi-Kitabi Rabbil Arbaab’ (The Final Verdict on the Distortion of the Book of the Lord of Lords).
    Allamah Khomeini mentions this scholar with great respect in his own book ‘A1Hukumatul Islamiyah” (The Islamic State). In fact, Khomeini has actually used Nuri Tibiris’s work entitled “Mustadrakul Wasail” to complete his theory of Wilayatul Faqih.

    [Wilayatul Faqih is the Islamic jurist’s right to overrule a ruling that contradicts Islamic law.]

    Khomeini writes about Abu Bakr and Omar (R.A.):
    “Those people who, in their envy to rule, attached themselves to the Deen of the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) and formed their own cliques could not possibly refrain from their actions on the bases of Quranic advice. They had to materialise their aims at any cost.” (Kashful Asraar: 114)

    He also writes:
    ‘Those who had no affiliation with the Quran and Islam except through their desire for the world and power. They had made the Qurun a vehicle to promote their agenda. (Ibid)

    In his book Kashful Asraar, Allamah Khomeni has dedicated a whole chapter to Abu Bakr’s opposition to the Quran and another chapter to the Omar’s opposition. (Ibid: 114 & 117)

    He has then continued to write a chapter on how to answer the critiques of the Ahlus Sunnah W’al Jama’ah with the heading: “An eye on the answers of the foolish.” (Ibid: 120)

    Khomeni writes about Uthman (R.A.):
    “We worship and recognise only that God Whose actions are based on concrete rationalism and Who does not rule against that rationalism. We do not worship a god who creates a building for Divine worship and justice and then strives to destroy that very building himself by giving authority to rascals like Yazid, Mu’awiyah and Uthman. (Ibid: 107)

    These are but a few selected views of Majlisi, Maqbool Dehlavi, Noori and Allamah Khomeini, the leader of the Iranian Revolution. These have been presented to you without any critique or commentary. The reader should judge for himself how much he can accept these beliefs. The reader should also ask himself if the rise of Khomeini in Iran was a political revolution or whether he had an agenda to propagate the Shi’ite beliefs. Or whether it was a challenge to all of the Muslim world, or a threat to the bonafides of the beliefs of Sunnis.

  • guest

    List of Shia scholars and their believe in Tahrif of Quran – Shiites will make you run away from anything good if you really get to know them, read their books n fatwas, listen to their filthy sermons, attend their husseiniyaats, watch their matam, …

    Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi.

    1) Ali al-Milani kept silence when someone said Majlisi belived in tahrif.

    2) Tayeeb Musawi al-Jazairi’s testimony that Majlisi did believe in tahrif.

    3) Majlisi cleary admitted that he believe in tahrif.

    4) Examples of tahrif from his book “Hayatul Qulub”.

    5) Majlisi – Uthman deleted things from Quran.

    Muhammad ibn Yaqub Al-Kulayni.

    1) Tayeeb Musawi al-Jazairi’s testimony that Kulayni did believe in tahrif.

    2) Kashani’s testimony against Kulayni, that he did believe in tahrif.

    3) Abul Hasan al-Amili’s testimony that Kulayni did belive in tahrif.

    4) Majlisi’s testimony that Kulayni did believe in tahrif.

    5) Ayatolla Fani Isfahani’s testimony that Kulayni did believe in tahrif.

    6) Kulayni’s report that Quran contained 17 000 verses, and it’s authentication from Majlisi.

    7) Kulayni’s ahadeth on tahrif.

    8 Real Quran with Mahdi of shias.

    Sheikh Mufid.

    1) Tayeeb Jazairi’s testimony that sheikh Mufid did believe in tahrif.

    2) Majlisi’s testimony that Mufid did believe in tahrif.

    3) Ali al-Milani kept silence when someone said Mufid belived in tahrif.

    Ayatolla Shubbar.

    1) His testimony that narrations regarding tahrif are almost mutawatir.

    Muhammad Salih Mazandarani

    1) His testimony that tahrif is mutawatir.

    Mirza Habibullah al-Khui.

    1) Questioned Quran authenticy.

    2) Second take from ayatullat

    Nematullah Jazairi.

    1) Tahrif is mutawatir.

    2) Other testimony.

    3) Testimony from Fani Isfahani that Jazairi did believe in tahrif.

    4) Jazairi – tahrif is mutawatir.

    5) Another testimony that tahrif is mutawatir.

    6) Testimony of al-Milani about Jazairi.

    Sheikh Wahid Bahbahani.

    1) Narrations testify that change happen in the Quran.

    Fayz Kashani.

    1) Tahrif did happen

    Ali ibn Ibrahim al-Qummi.

    1) Fayz Kashani’s testimony that al-Qummi believed in tahrif.

    2) Tayeeb Jazairi’s testimony that al-Qummi did believe in tahrif.

    3) Abul Hasan al-Amili’s testimony that al-Qummi did believe in tahrif.

    4) Fani Isfahani’s testimony that al-Qummi did believe in tahrif.

    5) Ali al-Qummi attacking authenticy of Quran.

    6) Al-Qummi in the intro to commentary says that Quran was corrupted.

    Allama Abul Hasan al-Amili

    1) Refuting shias which believe tahrif didn’t happen.

    2) Milani kept silence when someone said that this scholar did believe in tahrif.

    3) He says that majority of shia scholars did believe in tahrif.

    Abbas al-Qummi.

    1) New version of ayatul-Kursi with reference to al-Majlisi.

    Sharafutdin Abdulhusayn al-Musawi.

    1) Verse in Quran misplaced – either in error or deliberately

    Sharif al-Murtada.

    1) On tahrif.

    Ayatolla Tabatabai.

    1) There is no certainity that something from Quran isn’t missing.

    Baqir Sharif al-Qurashi.

    1) Uthman omitted verses from Quran.

    Adnan Bahrani.

    1) Tahrif is almost mutawatir.

    al-Barqi.

    1) Testimony of Tayeeb Jazairi that he did believe in tahrif.

    al-Ayashi.

    1) Testimony of Tayeeb Jazairi that he did believe in tahrif.

    2) Ahadeth from book of Ayashi on tahrif.

    3) 900 changed letters in the Quran – hadith from Ayashi.

    an-Nomani.

    1) Testimony of Tayeeb Jazairi that he did believe in tahrif.

    2) Names of 70 people were erased from Quran – hadith from Nomani.

    Furat ibn Ibrahim (al-Koofe).

    1) Testimony of Tayeeb Jazairi that he did believe in tahrif.

    2) Narration from his tafsir on tahrif.

    Ahmad ibn Abu Talib a-Tabrasi, author of “al-Ihtijaj”.

    1) Testimony of Tayeeb Jazairi that he did believe in tahrif.

    2) Testimony by Kashani that he did believe in tahrif.

    3) Hadith questioning Quran from his book.

    4)Abul Hasan al-Amulis testimony about Tabrasi and others.

    al-Hurr al-Amili.

    1) Testimony of Tayeeb Jazairi that he did believe in tahrif.

    2) Hadith questioning present Quran.

    Allama al-Fattuni.

    1) Testimony of Tayeeb Jazairi that he did believe in tahrif.

    Ayatollat Mirza Jawad at-Tabrizi.

    1) Fatwa on the corruption of Quran.

    Hashim al-Bahrani.

    1) Shia version and tafsir of 91 verse from al-Baqarah

  • guest

    Inside Iran: The Most Hated Creatures in Iran

    Since the movie was released in Iran, Iranians used to call Shia Mollahs “Marmulak” (Lizard), the most hated creature in Iran.

    By the way the movie “Marmulak” (lizard) is available all over the Internet (including youtube with english subtitles). There must be truth in it since it forced the Rafidah priesthood in Iran to ban it.

    Hilarious

    The COMPLETE film with ARABIC subtitle: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pM9ODCVev4

    And here with ENGLISH subtitle:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV-5c4zK8Zo&feature=related

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NmNI84xWIEA

  • guest

    How Shiites use Taqiyyah to Hide their Real Beliefs, Books, Fatwas, Hadith’s,… from getting Exposed whilst spewing propaganda by using imposters who are passed as Sunnis to demonize Muslims n Islam !?

    Every now and then Shia polemists try to present to Muslims narrations taken from books, allegedly claimed to be Sunni, in order to prove their beliefs from the books of Ahlul Sunnah wal Jamaa’.

    It is well documented that in the religion of Shias, taqiyya permits that Shias would appear to the public as Sunnis and hide their beliefs. To this effect Al-Khoei says in Al-Tanqeeh , an exegesis of Al-Urwatul Wuthqa [4/332-333]: “

    This is because what is benefited from the narrations about Taqiyya is that it is has only been instituted so that Shia can hide from those who differ with them and that they would not be known to be Shia or Rafidi, and for the concealment from them and complimenting them. It is evident that when the designee shows the madhab of Hanbalis infront of the Hanafi for example or vice versa , then concealment and not appearing as Shia or Rafidi is established with this and compliment happened with them. So if he prayed in the masjid of Hanafis according to the Madhab of Hanbalis then it could be truthfully said that he has prayed in their masjids or with them. The secret in that is that what is obligatory is just Taqiyya with the public (i.e Sunna), concealment (of identity) and complimenting them. None of the previously mentioned proofs makes obligatory the following of their different kinds and there is no proof for the compulsion to follow the madhab of the one being feared, rather what is essential is the concealment and compliment with the public (i.e Sunnis) and hiding Shiasm from them.”

    Muhammad Ibn Al-Hussan Ibn Abdul Samad who is known as Shiekh Bahai (d. 1031) said: “I was in Syria appearing to be a Shafii”. This confession by this under cover Shia was reported by Muhammad Muhammadi Ashtihardi in his book “Ajwad Al-Munatharat” (1/188)

    In this post I will try to point out some such books and authors that are falsely ascribed to Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jamaa’:

    (1) Al-Kanji Al-Shafii:
    The editor of his book: “ Al-Bayan fee Akhbar Sahib Al-Zaman”, who is also a Shiite, said: “ I have not come across a complete biography of Hafidh Al-Kanji Al-Shafi, for he has been ignored by many of his contemporary historians such as Ibn Khilikan in (Wafiyat Al-Ayan) , Abu Shama in (Al-Dhayl ala Al-Rawdatayn) , Al-Yunini in (Mira’at Al-Zaman) , Al-Dhahabi in (Tathkirat Al-Hufadh).”He also said: “ Historians mentioned that Hafidh Al-Kanji was killed in the year 658 , in the Ummayad Jami in Damascus , on the hands of the public who were antagonized by his reclining to Shia. Some others have added another reason for his murder, being that he used to deal with the Tatar and accepted a position that they gave to him as well as the money (molested) from those who were absent from his country.”Ibn Katheer, in Al-Bidaya wal Nihaya, clearly identifies him as a Rafidi: “ In the middle of the Jami, the public killed a Rafidi Shiekh who was helping Tatar over the money of people called Al-Fakhr Muhammad Ibn Yusuf Ibn Muhammad Al-Kanji. He had evil intentions , and was from the East , helping them over the money of Muslims. May Allah disparage him. And they killed a group of hypocrites of his likes, so an end was put to those who transgressed. Al-Hamdullilah”

    (2) Ibn Abi Al-Hadid:
    The author of “Rawdat Al-Jannat” (5/19) referred to him as: “ He is loyal to people of the Household of infallibility and purity (Ahlul Bayt Al-Isma’ wal Tahara) even though he used to appear in the costume of Ahlul Sunnah”In “Al-Kunna wal Al-Alqab”, Al-Qumi outlines the staunch and fanatic Shiite background of Ibn Abi Al-Hadid in Al-Madain and then when he moved to Baghdad his fanaticism reduced and was inclined to Mutazilla.

    (3) Sulayman Ibn Muhammad Al-Qunduzi Al-Hanafi:He is the author of Yanabi’ Al-Mawada. Aga Buzurg Tehrani included his book “Al-Thareea” , which is an Encyclopedia on Shia books. He said [25/290] : “ Even though the Shiasm of the author is not known, but he is Gnostic, and the Book is considered to be one of the books of Shia”

    (4) Ibrahim Ibn Muhammad Al-Juwaini (also called Al-Hamweeni):
    He is the author of “Faraid Al-Simtayn” He has been included in the book “Ayan Al-Shia” , an Encyclodia of Shia prominent figures, by Al-Ameen Al-Amili. Aga Buzurgh Tehrani, in “Thayl Kashf Al-Dhunoon” p. 70, pointed out that the chief of the Mongols, Ghazan, embrassed Islam through him and became a Shiite, and also his brother Shah Khudabanda who made his Shiasm apparent.Amongst the sheikhs that he was taught by, are Ibn Al-Muttahir Al-Hili and Khawaja Nusair Al-Din Al-Tusi. These are two prominent 12er figures.

    (5) Yusuf Fargali, known as the grandson of (Sibt) Ibn Al_Jawzi:
    He is the author of (Miraat Al-Zaman). Al-Dhahabi said: “ He has authored (Miraat Al-Zaman) and included very odd narrations in it (manakir). I do not think he is thiqqa in things he reports rather he exaggerates and goes aside. He then converted to Rafidism , and authored a book to this effect. Shiekh Muhiydin said: When the news of Sibt Ibn Al-Jawzi’s death reached my grandfather, he said: “ May Allah not have mercy on him. He was a Rafidi”

    (6) Nur Al-Din Ali Ibn Muhammad Ibn Al-Sabagh.
    Author of “Al-Fusool Al-Muhima”.His book is included in “Al-Dhareea” [16/246]. Tehrani said: “In the treatise “Shia Shiekhs” he is considered one of them, even though he is one of the great Malikis, this is why in “Kashf Al-Dhunoon” he said: “Some of them attributed the author to Rafidism for what he mentioned in his introduction / khutba.”

  • guest

    Nudity (Exposing Sex Organ) during Shia Salat (Prayer) are allowed in the deen of Shiite Majoosism according to their Hadith –

    Bihar al-Anwar by Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi, under Chapter 1: Covering of Private parts, and private part of the man and woman during salat…

    Majoos Priest Majlisi reported the following narration.

    بحار الانوار:80

    http://www.al-shia.org/html/ara/books/lib-hadis/behar80/117.htm

    “I asked about a man who prayed while his sex organ was outside without his knowledge, does he have to repeat or it’s valid? He said: There is no repetition for him, and his salat is valid.”

    Al-Majlisi continues and says: “Know this that there is no dispute about the obligation to cover awra during salat and the well-known opinion among our companions is that the awra of a man which he must cover during salat and other things is his front and rear. I mean his penis and testicles and anus ring excluding buttocks and thighs.”

    Note: Touching awra does not invalidate prayer in rafidism), as for rear his buttocks are enough.

    A rafidi can expose his buttocks in salat !!! So now we know why did the issue was raised about a man’s sex organ coming out during prayer, maybe he did not place his hand properly to cover his frontal awra.

  • guest

    Having Sex and Ghusl with Dead Shi’a Woman is Permissible in Shiism –

    Heres their revered Shia Ayatollah’s Fatwa regarding having sex and ghusl with dead shia woman.

    ( القسم : أحكام الزواج الدائم )

    السؤال : هل وطئ المرأة بعد وفاتها يوجب تكليفا للاحياء ، إذا كان بعد غسلها بإعادة الغسل أي بتغسيلها للجنابة .. وهل يجوز ذلك بالنسبة إلى الزوج ؟

    الجواب : لا يجب إعادة الغسل ، ولا يجوز ذلك من الزوج ، والله العالم.

    Twelver Shia Fatwa by Ayatullah Khoei:

    Question: Does having Sex with a Woman after her death makes the living Mukallaf of having to re-make the ghusl(washing) because she is in Janabah (Junb) in case this act happened after her washing… and can the Husband do it?

    Answer: It’s not required to re-make the ghusl nor is it allowed for the Husband, Allah knows best.

    Link:http://www.al-khoei.us/fatawa1/index.php?id=2251

  • guest

    Grave & Shrine importance in Shiism and why Shias are told to Grave Worship by their Ayadollars !? – It’s All n Only about Money $$$

    It became almost common knowledge that Imamite Shi’ism (just like extreme Sufism and Hinduism and…) heavily defends and propagates the erection of massive, golden shrines. Unfortunately this is not even restricted to their infallibles only (Ghuluw and Bida’ has not limitations anyways), but not non-Imams, leaders and so forth.

    To give you a TINY small view into the “Shrine-Business” of the Ayadollars (Mafia who strip the people of their intelect AND money in the name of “loving Ahl Al-Bayt”), we are going to present you some facts:

    http://www.photius.com/countries/iran/society/iran_society_religious_institutio~257.html

    Another major religious institution in Iran is the shrine. There are more than 1,100 shrines that vary from crumbling sites associated with local saints to the imposing shrines of Imam Reza and his sister Fatima in Mashhad and Qom, respectively.

    More than THOUSAND shrines of “Imamzadahs”! So they don’t make business with the shrines of their infallibles only, but on top of it with THOUSANDS of descandants of the Imams.

    Let us give you ONE example of THOUSAND:

    Source is a Shia website: Quelle: http://www.imamreza.net/eng/imamreza.php?id=6556

    As you can see, this is the Shrine of “Imamzadah Saleh” one of the alleged endless “descendants” of Imam Musa Al Kadhim (7th Imam). The pictures speak for themselves i.e. this is to what exaggeration leaves to in EVERY pagan cult (Sujud to the grave!) and THIS is why the Sharia (the Sunnah, not the Rafidah) is strictly agains EVERY sort of exaggeration with Prophets – peace be upon them all – let alone with non-prophetic righteouss men.

    It is well known that the Messenger of Allah Muhammad – sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallama – warned his people and Islamic Ummah NOT to exaggerate with him like the pagans did with their leaders.

    Yet we see a people, who went into extreme with the FAMILY of the Prophet and even with the DESCANDANTS of the FAMILY of the Prophet – peace be upon him. The produce of this Ghuluw is more than obvious and just for your information dear reader, this “Shrine” alone is one among more than a DOZEN of shrines just in and around Tehran (among them are: Imamzadeh Qasim, SHAH ABDUL AZEEM, Imamzadeh Hamza, Imamzadeh Tahir, Astana Bibi Shehr Bano, Imam Zadeh Dawoo and many more!

    This is the actual OUTCOME of this heresy:

    They have managed to gather all sorts of deviance in one place! Praying in a Masjid which was SOLELY erected for the grave of Khomeini (a practice accursed by the Prophet), hanging up of Images (Khomeini) INSIDE a Masjid and Shrine (a practice forbidden by the Prophet), doing Sujud on a grave (forbidden by the Prophet), PRAYING next to a grave (a practice accursed by the Prophet in the CLEAREST manner).

    But it gets worse..

    They have even erected Shrines for ZOROASTRIANS i.e. their forefathers. Like for Abu Lo’lo’a the Majoosi/Magician (zoroastrian) MURDRER of Omar Ibn Al-Khattab – radhiyallahu ‘anhu – the very same accursed Majoosi who shamelessly comitted suicide with his own blade after stabbing Omar DURING the Prayer like a coward. Yet this guy deserves an ENTIRE SHRINE in the Rafidite Anti-Islamic Rebuplic of Iran (since their grudge is based on their anti-arab feelings and on the Sahaba and Omar who brought Islam to Iran, under the pretext of “following Ahl Al-Bayt” they curse those who extinguished their Majoosi empire):

    A street banner, showing you the path to “Abu Lo’lo” !!!

    (It’ written:”Peace be upon you, o Abu Lo’lo’!)

    and finally the Mushriks themselves, celebrating the death of Omar (ra) and their hero, the MUSHRIK MAJOOSI Abu Lo’lo’a along with Shia scholars:

    A superstition, a heresy, a Bid’ah is a serious matter, that is why the finaly Deen of Allah, the Sharia of Muhammad – peace be upon him – even shut the TINIEST door which MIGHT led to kufr and exaggeration with righteouss men. The Prophet – peace be upon him – explicitely ORDERED his family AND companions to LEVEL every grave (let alone shrine!) which is higher then……

    If this is the standard set (…) then it is naturally that the Imamite Shia Mafia Scholars (Ayadollars) and their exeggeration has led to the upmost forms of Kufr, Shirk and heresy and superstitions. Allah knows at what point these devils gonna stop, but look, currently the Rafidah and the Rafidi regime are even travelling with MOBILE-SHRINES true the motto: ”If you don’t visit the Shrine, then the shrine will visit YOU!”

    They literally ripp-off INNOCENT Shias (who indeed have good intentions i.e. love for the Ahl Al-Bayt) and as you can see people are encouraged to do “Tawassul” (in fact ISTIGHATHA Bighayri Allah i.e. DUA/WORSHIP to others than Allah UNDER the EXCUSE of Tawassul), throw money INTO the Shrine AND to buy “Nakheels” (green ribbons) to make a wish and knot them BACK to the shrine.

    Again ALL sorts of heresy, paganism and superstition i.e. EVERYTHING Islam came to EXTINGUISH at ONE place, at ONE time, revived by these grave-business charlatans and on top of it in the NAME OF “following the school of Ahl Al-Bayt”!!!

  • guest

    Qiblah of Shias (the GRAVES) !!! Where is the Qiblah of Shia’s !?

    Is it towards Makkah (al-Masjidil Haraam) or towards the GRAVE? Lets see and read what their authentic book Bihaar al-Anwaar says.

    Book: Bihaar al-Anwaar – Al-Jami’ah Li Durar Akhbar Al-Aimmah Al-Athaar
    Author: Muhammad Baqir Al-Majlisi
    Volume 41 p.26

    Sixth: Praying two Rak’ahs for purpose of the visitation after he has completed it. If he was visiting the Prophet, then [he should pray the two Rak’ahs] in the Rawdah, but if [the visit] was for one of the Imams then at his head, and if he prays it in the Masjid of that place, that would be permissible too. A Rukhsah (ruling of permissibility) was narrated in praying them (i.e. these two Rak’ahs) facing the grave even if your back was towards the Qiblah, it would be permitted, although it is not favored except from a distance.

    So shias pray towards the GRAVE based on their own authentic book Bihaar al-Anwaar and it is widely practiced in their holy sites like Karbala, Najaf, Quom.

  • guest

    Taqqiyah free hate filled Shia Hadith’s from their highly revered books – Why they hide such Hadith’s n Books from the World !?

    The reason behind writing this article is not to create hatred for the Shia Community. But, rather to educate everyone including the Shias who due to their ignorance are being fooled by some Shia. They think that brotherhood and unity could be established between Ahlesunnah and Shiites, and Some Shias and undercover Shia agents are taking undue advantage of this view of theirs to weaken traditional and authentic Sunnism by propagating Shia beliefs to such ignorant and lay Sunnis. Thus its necessary and feel it as a duty to reveal before our readers the Taqiyyah-free belief of Shiism regarding Non-Shias. After reading this article, we leave it upon our readers to judge by themselves that, could unity with Shias really be achieved after knowing their Taqiyyah-free beliefs regarding Non-Shias(Sunnis, etc). We expect that after reading this article and the evidences we presented, except the under-cover Shia agents, all our unbiased and sensible readers will accept the fact that unity with Shias, in general is an impossible thing.

    I – Why are Ahlesunnah considered Nasibis and Kafirs by Shiism?.

    Inorder to find the answer let us present some Shia hadeeth of Shia Imams and also statements of esteemed Shia scholars.

    Shia ahadeeth which declares that Ahlesunnah are Kafir:

    1. Ma’ani al akhbaar by Shaikh Sadooq (ra)

    (باب) * (معنى الناصب)
    Section (on the) (Meaning of the [term] nasibi)

    حدثنا محمد بن على ماجيلويه – رضى الله عنه – قال: حدثني عمى محمد بن أبي القاسم، عن محمد بن على الكوفي، عن ابن فضال عن المعلى بن خنيس، قال: سمعت أبا عبد الله عليه السلام يقول: ليس الناصب من نصب لنا أهل البيت لانك لاتجد أحدا يقول: أنا ابغض محمدا وآل محمد، ولكن الناصب من نصب لكم وهو يعلم أنكم تتولونا أو تتبرؤون من أعدائنا، وقال عليه السلام: من أشبع عدوا لنا فقد قتل وليا لنا

    Told us Muhammad b. Ali Majiluwaih (ra) who said: Told me my uncle Muhammad b. abi al Qasim, from Muhammad b. Ali al Kufi, from ibn Fudhaal from al Mu’alla b. Khunais, who said: I heard Aba Abdullah (as) saying: “The nasib is not one who has hatred for us ahlulbayt (as) for indeed you will not find anyone saying: I detest Muhammad (pbuh) and his (pbuh) pure family, but instead the nasib is one who has hatred for you people and he knows that you people love us (as) or hate those from our (as) enemies.” And [Imam (as)] said: “Whoever fed our enemy, then he has killed a friend of ours”.

    2. Thawabul ‘amaal wa ‘aqaabul ‘amaal by Shaikh Sadooq (ra)

    و بهذا الإسناد عن محمد بن أحمد عن إبراهيم بن إسحاق عن عبد الله بن حماد [عبد الله بن سنان] عن أبي عبد الله (ع) قال ليس الناصب من نصب لنا أهل البيت لأنك لم تجد رجلا يقول أنا الناصب [أبغض] محمدا و آل محمد و لكن الناصب من نصب لكم و هو يعلم أنكم تتوالونا و أنكم من شيعتنا
    And from same chains from Muhammad b. Ahmad from Ibrahim b. Ishaq from ‘Abdullah b. Hammad[‘Abdullah b. Sinan] from Abi Abdullah(as) said: “The nasib is not one who has hatred for us ahlulbayt(as) for indeed you won’t find a man say I’m the hater (I detest/loathe) of Muhammad (PBUH) and the pure family of Muhammad(PBUH) but instead the nasib is the one who has hatred for you people and he knows that you people love us and that you people are among our shias.”

    Comment: These ahadeeth shows that, if any Sunni hates a Shia for their cursing of Abubakr(as), Umar(as) or Ayesha(as) or rest of Sahaba(as) or if any Sunni hates a Shia for their enmity towards Sahaba(as) and some wives of Prophet(Saw) then this will make the Sunnis as Nasibis, as per Shiism. From these reports we can clearly see that the complete Ahlesunnah are Nasibis according to Shias, since no true Sunni could avoid hating the Shias, for their insults, cursing and enmity towards Sahaba(as) and mothers of believers(as).

    3.

    الشهيد الثاني من الاطلاع على غرائب الأخبار فذهب إلى أن الناصبي هو الذي نصب العداوة لشيعة أهل البيت (عليهم السلام) وتظاهر في القدح فيهم كما هو حال أكثر المخالفين لنا في هذه الأعصار في كل الأمصار

    Shahid al Thani discerned from the information in strange ahadith, so he adopted the view that the nasibi is the one who holds enmity towards the Shias of ahlulbait and expresses slanders on them, as is the state of our opponents in this period in all the countries.” (Hadaiq al Nadhirah by Shaikh Yusuf al Bahrani,Volume 5, Page 175).

    4. Shia scholar Faydh al-Kashani in his book states:

    And who would reject Imamate of one of them, is like rejected prophecy of all prophets – alaihuma salam.

    And Sadiq (alaihi salam) said: The one who rejected last from us is like rejected first from us.

    And from messenger (sallalahu alaihi wa ali): Who would reject (not believe in) Ali, his Imama after me, is like the one who rejected my prophecy, and who rejected (didn’t believe in) my prophecy is like the one who rejected Allah and His Rububbiyah.( Minhaju Najat, page 44)

    5. It is mentioned in Shia book Haq al-Yaqin that:

    “People wrote to Imam Ali Naqi that are we required to know besides that Nasibi considers Munafiq Awwal (First Munafiq – Sayyiduna Abu Bakar) and Daum (Second – Sayyiduna Umar) to be superior than Janab Amir (Sayyiduna Ali) and believes in their Imamat (Khilafat). Hadhrat replied, ‘Anyone who holds such a belief is a Nasibi’.”(Haq al-Yaqin of Mullah Baqir Majlisi, Vol. 2, p. 521).

    6. Shia sheikh Muhammad Hasan an-Najafi Jawhari in his book “Jawaher al kalam” (6/66) listed 5 types of nawaseeb stating:

    “And third one, those who reject their (imams) superiority when hears them, fourth, those who believes in superiority other than Ali (alayhi salam) upon him, and fifth, those who reject nass on Ali (alayhi salam). (“Jawaher al kalam” 6/66)

    7. It is narrated in Shia book:

    حـدثـنـا مـحـمد بن علي (رحمه اللّه ), عن عمه محمد بن ابي القاسم , عن محمد بن علي الكوفي , عن محمد بن سنان , عن زياد بن المنذر, عن سعيد بن جبير, عن ابن عباس , قال : قال رسول اللّه (صـلـى اللّه عـلـيه وآله ): المخالف على علي بن ابي طالب بعدي كافر, والمشرك به مشرك , والـمـحـب له مؤمن , والمبغض له منافق ,والمقتفي لا ثره لاحق , والمحارب له مارق , والراد عليه زاهق , علي نور اللّه في بلاده ,وحجته على عباد, علي سيف اللّه على اعدائه , ووارث علم انبيائه , عـلـي كـلـمـة اللّه الـعـلـيا, وكلمة اعدائه السفلى , علي سيد الاوصيا, ووصي سيد الانبيا, علي امـيـرالـمـؤمـنـيـن , وقـائد الـغـر الـمـحـجـلـيـن , وامـام المسلمين , لا يقبل اللّه الايمان الا بولايته وطاعته
    Narrated Muhammad bin Ali [rahimahullah] from his uncle Muhammad bin Abil-Qasim, from Muhammad bin Ali al-Kufi, from Muhammad bin Sinaan, from Ziyad bin al-Munthir, from Sa’eed bin Jubair, from Ibn Abbas said: The Messenger [sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam] said: He who disputes with Ali bin Abi talib [alaihi salam] after me is a Kafir and he who joins someone with him is a Polytheist. He who loves him is a believer, and he who hates him is a hypocrite. He who follows him is a follower, and who fights him is an apostate, and who rejects him will perish. Ali is the Light of Allah in His earth and His proof on His servants. Ali is the sword of Allah against His enemies, and the inheritor of the knowledge of His Prophets. Ali is the Upper Word of Allah, and the word of his enemies is the lower. Ali is the Master of the Appointees (Awsiya), and the Appointee of the Master of Prophets. Ali is the Chief of Believers (Amirul-Mu’mineen), leader of “al-Ghurr al-Muhajjalin” and the Imam of all Muslims, Allah does not accept the faith but by accepting his Walayah and (full) obediance to him.”( “Amali”, by Shia shaykh as-Saduq , p.19, Narration 6)

    8. Shia scholar Hussain ibn al-Shaikh Muhammad al-Usfoor ad-Drazi al-Bahrani in his book “Mahasin nafsaniya fi ajwibat masail horasaniya” (p157) said:
    أنه ليس الناصب إلا عبارة عن التقديم على علي غيره
    “As you have learned before term nasib doesn’t mean other thing than favour someone over Ali”. (“Mahasin nafsaniya fi ajwibat masail horasaniya”, p157).

    Comment: From this hadeeth and verdicts of esteemed Shia scholars we find that anyone who considers Abubakr(as) superior to Ali(as) and believes in Imamat(Khilafat) of Abubakr(as) and Umar(as) then they are declared Nasibi, this implies that all the Sunnis are considered Nasibis since Ahlesunnah believe in superiority of Abubakr(as) over Ali(as), as this was the view of Ali(as) himself, which was authentically reported in Sunni books through Mutawattir reports, and Ahlesunnah also believe in Khilafat of Abubakr(as). Moreover, we would like to present a an open verdict of Shia scholar who openly declared what we stated. Shia scholar Husien Aal-‘Asfour states : “… Rather, their narrations [‘Alaihim Al-Salam] are in declaration that the Nasibi is he who is referred to as the Sunni”… “And there is no disagreement that what is meant by the Nasibah in [that narration] are the People of Sunnah (Sunnis). (Al-Mahasen Al-Nafsaniyah fee Ajwebat Al-Masael Al-Khurasaniya”, p. 147)

    Nasibis(label given to Sunnis by Shias) are considered Kafir(disbelievers) as per Shiism:

    As we have proven above that Ahlesunnah are considered Nasibis in the light of Shia narrations, So now let us see what is ruling of Shiism upon Nasibis.

    1. Shia scholar Baqir al-Majlisi says in commentary of a narration in Mir’at al-`Uqul where the word “Nasibi” was used for a man:

    إن كان المراد بالناصب، المبغض المعاند لأهل البيت عليهم السلام كما هو الأظهر فهو كافر، ودمه هدر
    “If by ‘Nasibi’ it was meant the hater and enemy of the Ahl al-Bayt `alayhim al-salam, which is most obvious, then he is a kafir and his blood is to be spilled unavailingly.(Mir’at al-`Uqul , vol 24:page 211)

    2. Shia scholar Ni`matullah al-Jaza’iri says about a “Nasibi”:

    الذي ورد في الأخبار أنه نجس وأنه شر من اليهودي والنصراني والمجوسي، وأنه كافر نجس بإجماع علماء الشيعة الإمامية رضوان الله عليهم ، فالذي ذهب إليه أكثر الأصحاب هو أن المراد به من نصب العداوة لآل بيت محمد (ص)
    “What is reported is that he is worse than the Jew, Christian and the Magian; and he is an impure kafir by the unanimity of the scholars of Shi`a Imamiyya ridwanullahi `alayhim; and what the majority of scholars have opined is that what is meant by nasb [i.e., the trait that makes one Nasibi] is enmity for the progeny of Muhammad sallallahu `alayhi wasallam.” (al-Anwar al-Nu`maniyya(vol 2, page 306).

  • guest

    II – Taqiyyah-free Testimonies of Shia scholars, where Ahlesunnah/Non-Shia were declared as Kafir(disbelievers) and Nasibis..

    1. Esteemed Shia scholar Baqir Majlisi wrote in his book:

    يطلق على من أخل بشي‏ء من العقائد الإيمانية و إن لم يكن ضروريا لدين‏

    الإسلام كالإمامة، و المشهور أنهم في الآخرة بحكم الكفار و هم مخلدون في النار كالمخالفين و سائر فرق الشيعة سوى الإمامية، و قد دلت عليه أخبار كثيرة أوردناها في كتابنا الكبير….

    و أما الأحكام الدنيوية أيضا كالطهارة و التناكح و التوارث فالمشهور أنهم في جميع ذلك بحكم المسلمين، و ذهب السيد المرتضى رضي الله عنه و جماعة إلى أنهم في الأمور الدنيوية أيضا بحكم الكفار، و الذي يظهر من بعض الأخبار أنهم واقعا في جميع الأحكام بحكم الكفار لكن الله تعالى لما علم أن للمخالفين دولة و غلبة على الشيعة و لا بد لهم من معاشرتهم رخص لهم في جميع ذلك و أجرى على المخالفين في زمان الهدنة و التقية أحكام المسلمين و في زمن القائم عليه السلام لا فرق بينهم و بين الكفار، و به يمكن الجمع بين الأخبار

    Whoever does not believe in something required for eeman (true belief), although not essential for Islam (i.e. to be a mere Muslim) such as Imamah, so it is well known that they are considered kuffar (disbelievers) in the akhirah and would reside in hellfire like the non Shias and all the sub sects of Shiaism other than the Imamis (i.e. Twelver Shias). This has been proven by extensive ahadith which we have recorded in our voluminous book….And as for the religious rulings to be applied to them in dunya (i.e. in this world, not the hereafter), such as in issues of taharah (ritual purity), nikah (marriage) and inheritance, so it is popular that they would be treated as Muslims in all those issues, while Sharif al Murtada and a group of scholars adopted the view that they should be treated as kuffar in dunya also. And it does appear from some of the ahadith that they should truly be treated as kuffar in all Islamic affairs, but however, since Allah (swt) knew that the non Shias would rule and prevail over the Shias and therefore the Shias would have no choice but to socialize with them, thus He (swt) made a concession for the Shias on this and established the application of Islamic laws upon non Shias during the period of truce and taqiyya. But when Imam Mahdi (as) appears, there would be no difference between the non Shias and the kuffar. This way it is possible to reconcile between the ahadith (i.e. to reconcile those ahadith which declare non shias to be Muslims and those which declare them kuffar). (Miratul Uqul by Majlisi, Volume 11, Page 190).

    Comment:This confession from high ranking Shia scholar Baqir Majlisi clearly shows that, some Shia scholars declared non-Shias as Muslims due to being in State of Taqiyyah(dissimulation), however the reality is that non shias are considered Kuffar. And when there will be no taqiyyah then non-Shias would be considered Kuffar. So its only the ignorant among the Ahlesunnah who fell into the trap of Shias who claim that they consider Sunnis as Muslims, while the reality is not what Shia scholar Baqir Majlisi exposed.

    2. Views of Esteemed Shia scholars such as Shiekh Mufeed, Shiekh Tusi and Allama ibn Idris al Hilli:

    قال المفيد في المقنعة: ولا يجوز لأحد من أهل الايمان أنيغسل مخالفا للحق في الولاية ولا يصلي عليه

    ونحوه قال ابن البراج. وقال الشيخ في التهذيب بعد نقل عبارة المقنعة: الوجه فيه أن المخالف لأهل الحق كافر فيجب أن يكون حكمه حكم الكفار إلا ما خرج بالدليل.

    وقال ابن إدريس في السرائر بعد أن اختار مذهب المفيد في عدم جواز الصلاة على المخالف ما لفظه: وهو أظهر ويعضده القرآن وهو قوله تعالى: ” ولا تصل على أحد منهم مات أبدا.. ” (١) يعني الكفار، والمخالف لأهل الحق كافر بلا خلاف بيننا

    Shaikh Mufid said in his book “al Muqnia”: “It is not permissible for anyone among the believers to bathe the dead body of an opponent of the truth of wilayah, or to pray upon him.” Qadi ibn al Barraj also said similar to it. And Shaikh Tusi wrote in his book “Tahdhib al Ahkam” after quoting the above mentioned text of “al Muqnia”: “The reason for this is that the opponent of the people upon the path of haqq (truth) is a kafir, thereby deserving the ruling of a kafir, except for the one who is exempted due to proof.” And Allama ibn Idris al Hilli also adopted the view of Shaikh Mufid regarding the impermissibility of praying the funeral prayer of the non shia, he wrote: “It is apparent and supported by the Qur’an. Allah says (al Qur’an 9:84) “And never offer a prayer on any one of them who dies”, which means that they are kuffar. The opponent of the people of truth is a kafir and there is no disagreement among us on this point.” (Hadaiq al Nadhirah by Shaikh Yusuf al Bahrani,Volume 5, Page 175).

    3. Shia scholar Al-Mufeed stated in his book:

    16 – Speech about Innovators and the titles and the rules they deserve:

    Imamia agree that all innovators are Kafir. It is necessary for the Imam, when in power, to make them do repentance, after inviting(dawah) them(to reject biddah) and reasoning with them and providing them evidence. If they repent and return to the straight path, they will be freed, otherwise, on the ground of turning back from the faith, they will be killed. And if anyone of them dies in a state of innovation is from the people of hell. (Awail al-Maqalat., point 16. Page 65)

    4. Ayatullah Naraqi states in his book:

    دليل القائل بالنجاسة: أنهم كفرة ونصاب، وكل أولئك أنجاس

    أما الأول: فلانكارهم ما علم من الدين ضرورة، ولتواتر الأخبار معنى به، ولذا صرح جماعة بكفرهم، كابن نوبخت مسندا له إلى جمهور أصحابنا، والشيخ في التهذيب، والسيد، والحلي، والفاضل في بعض كتبه، وهو الظاهر من المفيد والقاضي

    Reasons adopted by proponents of their (non shias’) najasah (ritual impurity), their being kuffar (disbelievers) and nasibis, and all of them being najis (ritually impure).

    As for the first (reason), so it is due to their rejection of what is known to be among the fundamentals of religion, and due to tawatur of the ahadith implying such. And thus a group of scholars like Ibn Nawbakht (predecessor of Shaikh Sadooq) as well as the majority of the classical Imami scholars, Shaikh Tusi (385 – 460 AH) in Tahdhibul Ahkam, Sharif al Murtada (355 – 436 AH), Ibn Idris al Hilli (543 – 598 AH), and Allama Hilli (648 – 726 AH) in some of his books (in Muntahul Matlab) declared them to be kuffar. And this ruling is also apparent from Shaikh Mufid (336 – 413 AH) and Qadi ibn al Barraj (401 – 481 AH). (Mustanad al Shia by Ayatullah Naraqi, Volume 1, Page 206).

    5. Shia Aytollah Shubbar In his book “Sharhul ziyaratul jamiatul kabira” at page 136 called Hasan al-Basri – the mukhalif (opponent).

    And later he expressed his opinion on these opponents by saying:

    وقد دلت اخبار كثيرة على كفر المخالفين يحتاج جمعها الى كتاب مفرد

    And many narrations proofs disbelief(Kufr) of non-shias, it makes necessary to gather them in book dedicated especially to this.(“Sharhul ziyaratul jamiatul kabira” p 150.)

    6. Shia Shaikh Yusuf al Bahrani states in his book:

    المشهور في كلام أصحابنا المتقدمين هو الحكم بكفرهم ونصبهم ونجاستهم وهو المؤيد بالروايات الإمامية، قال الشيخ ابن نوبخت (قدس سره) وهو من متقدمي أصحابنا في كتابه فص الياقوت: دافعوا النص كفرة عند جمهور أصحابنا ومن أصحابنا من يفسقهم.. الخ. وقال العلامة في شرحه أما دافعوا النص على أمير المؤمنين (عليه السلام) بالإمامة فقد ذهب أكثر أصحابنا إلى تكفيرهم لأن النص معلوم بالتواتر من دين محمد (صلى الله عليه وآله) فيكون ضروريا أي معلوما من دينه ضرورة فجاحده يكون كافرا كمن يجحد وجوب الصلاة وصوم شهر رمضان. واختار ذلك في المنتهى فقال في كتاب الزكاة في بيان اشتراط وصف المستحق بالايمان ما صورته: لأن الإمامة من أركان الدين وأصوله وقد علم ثبوتها من النبي (صلى الله عليه وآله) ضرورة والجاحد لها لا يكون مصدقا للرسول في جميع ما جاء به فيكون كافرا. انتهى. وقال المفيد في المقنعة: ولا يجوز لأحد من أهل الايمان أنيغسل مخالفا للحق في الولاية ولا يصلي عليه

    ونحوه قال ابن البراج. وقال الشيخ في التهذيب بعد نقل عبارة المقنعة: الوجه فيه أن المخالف لأهل الحق كافر فيجب أن يكون حكمه حكم الكفار إلا ما خرج بالدليل.

    وقال ابن إدريس في السرائر بعد أن اختار مذهب المفيد في عدم جواز الصلاة على المخالف ما لفظه: وهو أظهر ويعضده القرآن وهو قوله تعالى: ” ولا تصل على أحد منهم مات أبدا.. ” (١) يعني الكفار، والمخالف لأهل الحق كافر بلا خلاف بيننا

    what is popular among the classical scholars is that the non shias are kuffar (disbelievers), nasibis and najis. This view is supported by shia ahadith. Shaikh ibn Nawbakht who was one of the classical scholars, said in his book “Fas al Yaqoot”: “The ruling of kufr has been advocated by the majority of our companions, while there are some among our companions who consider them sinners……..”. And Allama Hilli explained this text by saying “As for defending the Prophet (pbuh)’s ruling of Ali (as) being the Imam, so most of our companions have ruled upon the non shias being kuffar (disbelievers) since the hadith designating Ali as the Imam is known to be mutawatir, thereby making it a fundamental aspect of the religion. Therefore, one who rejects it is deemed a kafir like one who rejects the obligation of salat (Islamic prayer) or fasting of Ramadan.” And he adopted this view in his book “Muntahul Mutlab” where he wrote in the section on zakat, while explaining the conditions of it being necessary for the receiver to be a believer “Because the Imamate is among the pillars of the religion and its fundamentals, and evidence of its necessity is known from the Prophet (pbuh), its rejector does not affirm collectively what the Prophet (pbuh) came with, therefore he is deemed a kafir….”( Hadaiq al Nadhirah by Shaikh Yusuf al Bahrani,Volume 5, Page 175).

    7. Shia Ayatullah Saleh Mazindrani

    قال الفاضل المولى محمد صالح المازندراني في شرح أصول الكافي:

    ومن أنكرها يعني الولاية فهو كافر حيث أنكر أعظم ما جاء به الرسول وأصلا من أصوله

    Ayatullah Saleh Mazindrani wrote in his commentary of Usul al Kafi: “And whoever denied it, i.e. wilayah, so he is a kafir as he has denied the greatest fundamental principle brought by the Prophet (pbuh). (Hadaiq al Nadhirah by Shaikh Yusuf al Bahrani,Volume 5, Page 175).

    8. Shia scholar Qadi Noorullah Shostri:

    قال الشريف القاضي نور الله في كتاب إحقاق الحق: من المعلوم أن الشهادتين بمجردهما غير كافيتين إلا مع الالتزام بجميع ما جاء به النبي (صلى الله على وآله) من أحوال المعاد والإمامة كما يدل عليه ما اشتهر من قوله (صلى الله عليه وآله) (٢) ” من مات ولم يعرف إمام زمانه مات ميتة جاهلية ” ولا شك أن المنكر لشئ من ذلك ليس بمؤمن ولا مسلم لأن الغلاة والخوارج وإن كانوا من فرق المسلمين نظرا إلى الاقرار بالشهادتين إلا أنهما من الكافرين نظرا إلى جحودهما ما علم من الدين وليكن منه بل من أعظم أصوله إمامة أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام

    Qadi Noorullah Shostri (Aka Shahid Thalith) wrote in his book Ihqaqul Haq: “It is known that the two testimonies alone are not sufficient until they are supplemented collectively with what was brought by the Prophet (pbuh) among the teachings of resurrection and Imamate, as is evidenced by the popular hadith “Whoever died without knowing the Imam of his time, would have died the death of jahilliyah.” And there is no doubt that its denier is neither a Momin (believer) nor a Muslim because even though the Ghulat and Khawarij are listed as Islamic sects due to their professing the two testimonies (shahadatain) but they are still kuffar due to their rejection of what is known to be a part of religion, and from it, in fact from the greatest of religious principles is the Imamate ofAmirul momineen (as).” (Hadaiq al Nadhirah by Shaikh Yusuf al Bahrani,Volume 5, Page 175).

    9. Shia Muhaqqiq abu al Hasan al Sharif ibn al Shaikh Muhammad Tahir stated:

    وليت شعري أي فرق بين من كفر بالله تعالى ورسوله ومن كفر بالأئمة (عليهم السلام) مع أن كل ذلك من أصول الدين؟ إلى أن قال: ولعل الشبهة عندهم زعمهم كون المخالف مسلما حقيقة وهو توهم فاسد مخالف للأخبار المتواترة، والحق ما قاله علم الهدى من كونهم كفارا مخلدين في النار

    Muhaqqiq abu al Hasan al Sharif ibn al Shaikh Muhammad Tahir, , in his commentary upon “Al Kifayah” wrote: “I wonder, is there any difference between disbelieving in Allah and His messenger, and in disbelieving in the Imamate of the Imams even though they are all from the fundamentals of the religion?” He further continued: “And perhaps they are under the impression that the non shia is a Muslim in reality, but it is an invalid delusion which goes against the mutawatir ahadith, and the truth is what has been stated by Sharif al Muratada that they are kuffar who would reside in hell forever. (Hadaiq al Nadhirah by Shaikh Yusuf al Bahrani,Volume 5, Page 175).

    10. Shia scholar Nematullah Jazairi states in his book:

    It was narrated from the Prophet(saw) that the sign of the Nawasib is favoring other than Ali over him (i.e. a Nasibi is anyone that favors anyone over Ali, be it Abu Bakr, Umar, or Uthman) … This can also be returned to the first, [meaning] that what is meant by favoring others over him are those who do it in a manner of firm belief and certainty, in such a way that the imitators and the weak are not included; [That is because] their (i.e. the imitators) favoring of others over him (i.e. Ali) was a result of their imitation of their scholars, fathers, and predecessors, and that they have no means of arriving at [such a conclusion] or even affirming [it with certainty by themselves]. This meaning (i.e. that Nasibi is anyone who favors anyone over Ali) is supported [by the fact that] the Imams [‘Alaihim AlSalam] and their Khawas (close companions) have referred to Abu Hanifa and his likes as Nasibiis. Even though Abu Hanifa was not from among those who demonstrated animosity to Aal Al-Bayt [‘Alaihim Al Salam], rather he used to [love] visiting [and accompanying] them, and used to demonstrate [love,] care and affection towards them. Yes, he did go against their views [in cases], and used to say: Ali said [so-and-so], [and] I say [so-and-so] [So] with that, the view of Al-Sayid Al-Murtada and Ibn Idrees [… their souls] is strengthened, as well as the view of some of our contemporary scholars that all those that oppose us (Al-Mukhalifeen) are Najasah (Filth – unclean). That is based on using the terms Kufr and Shirk to describe them in the Book and the Sunnah, so that term would [also] encompass them when used, and because you have verified that most of them are Nawasib by that meaning.( Book: Anwar an-Nomaniyah. Vol 2, page 308, Author: Nematullah Jazairi.)

    11. Shia sheikh Muhammad Hasan an-Najafi al-Jawhari in his book “Jawaher al-kalam” quoted other shia scholar saying:
    “أن الناصب يطلق على خمسة أوجه: الخارجي القادح في علي (ع)، الثاني ما ينسب إلى أحدهم (عليهم السلام) ما يسقط العدالة، الثالث من ينكر فضيلتهم لو سمعها، الرابع من اعتقد فضيلة غير علي (ع)، الخامس من أنكر النص على علي (ع) بعد سماعه أو وصوله إليه بوجه يصدقه
    The Nasibi title is designated(for a person) over five reasons: For a Khariji who criticizes Ali (as); Secondly for he who attributes something that invalidates uprightness (adala) to any of the Imams, Thirdly, for he who denies a virtue of theirs when he heard it; Fourthly, for one who believes in the superiority of someone other than Ali (over him); Fifthly, he who denied the report of explicit election of Ali after hearing it or its reaching to him in a manner that allows him to confirm it”. (Jawaher al-kalam vol 6, p 66).

    Comment: From the fourth reason all of Ahlesunnah become Nasibi, since they believe in superiority of Abubakr(as) over Ali(as), as this was the view of Ali(as) himself, which was authentically reported in Mutawattir reports.

    12. Shia scholar Hussain ibn al-Shaikh Muhammad al-Usfoor ad-Drazi al-Bahrani in his book “Mahasin nafsaniya fi ajwibat masail horasaniya” (p157) said:
    أنه ليس الناصب إلا عبارة عن التقديم على علي غيره
    “As you have learned before term nasib doesn’t mean other thing than favour someone over Ali”. (“Mahasin nafsaniya fi ajwibat masail horasaniya”, p157).

    Comment: From this definition, all of Ahlesunnah become Nasibi, since they believe in superiority of Abubakr(as) over Ali(as), as this was the view of Ali(as) himself, which was authentically reported in Sunni books through Mutawattir reports.

    13. Shia scholar Husien Aal-‘Asfour states : “… Rather, their narrations [‘Alaihim Al-Salam] are in declaration that the Nasibi is he who is referred to as the Sunni”.

    He then brings a narration to support what he is saying, and comments on it saying:

    “And there is no disagreement that what is meant by the Nasibah in [that narration] are the People of Sunnah (Sunnis), who say that the Azhan was shown to Ubi ibn Kaa’b in a dream. So it became apparent for you that the dispute between those holding these three views [about the definition of the Nasibi] – i.e. those who said that it involves only favoring, carrying hatred to their Shi’ah as was adopted by Muhammad Amin in Al-Fawaed Al-Madaniya, and carrying animosity towards them ‘Alaihim Al-Salam, as is what is chosen by … is only a linguistic dispute, since it is clear how these [three views] are [attached and related] to each other”. (Book: “Al-Mahasen Al-Nafsaniyah fee Ajwebat Al-Masael Al-Khurasaniya”, p. 147).

    Comment: This shia scholar openly declares Sunnis as Nasibis, and as we have proven in our article that as per Shiism, Nasibis are considered Kafir.

    14. Shia scholar Muhammad b. Hasan al Najafi:
    قال محمد بن حسن النجفي في جواهر الكلام : 6/62 : ( والمخالف لأهل الحق كافر بلا خلاف بيننا ، كالمحكي عن الفاضل محمد صالح في شرح أصول الكافي ، بل والشريف القاضي نور الله في إحقاق الحق ، من الحكم بكفر منكري الولاية ، لأنها أصل من أصول الدين

    Muhammad b. Hasan al Najafi wrote in Jawahirul Kalam, Volume 6 Page 62: “And the opponent of the people of truth is a kafir, without any disagreement between us (i.e. the scholars), as has been reported by Fadhil Muhammad Saleh in his exegesis of Usul al Kafi, as well as by Qadi Noorullah Shostri in Ihqaqul Haq wherein he declared the denier of Wilayah a kafir as it is a fundamental principle among the fundamentals of religion.”

    15. Shia scholar Baqir Majlisi stated:

    قال المجلسي في بحار الأنوار: 23/390 ط. بيروت : ( إعلم أن إطلاق لفظ الشرك والكفر على من لم يعتقد بإمامة أمير المؤمنين والأئمة من ولده (ع) وفضل عليهم غيرهم ، يدل على أنهم كفار مخلدون في النار

    “Note that the terms shirk (polytheism) and kufr (disbelief) apply to one who does not believe in the Imamah of Ali (as) or his progeny, and gives precedence to others over them, proving that they are kuffar destined to reside in hell.”( Biharul Anwar, Volume 23 Page 290 ).

    16. Shia scholar Abdullah Shabbar stated:

    قال عبد الله شبر في حق اليقين في معرفة أصول الدين : 2/188 ط. بيروت : ( وأما سائر المخالفين ممن لم ينصب ولم يعاند ولم يتعصب ، فالذي عليه جملة من الإمامية كالسيد المرتضى أنهم كفار في الدنيا والآخرة ، والذي عليه الأشهر أنهم كفار مخلدون في النار

    “And as for the rest of the non Shias among those who do not have nasb (i.e. are not nasibis), hostility and prejudice, so a number of Shia scholars like Sharif al Murtada declared them to be kuffar in this world as well as in the hereafter, and the prevailing ruling is that they are kuffar destined for hell.” (Haqqul Yaqeen fi marifatul usul ad-Din, Volume 2 Page 188).

    17. Shia Ayatollat Sayed Muhammad Shirazi states in his book:

    “As for all the other groups [sects] of the shia – other than the the itnaa ashariyya [The twelvers] : then many texts have proved their disbelief , like the previous narrations which have been mentioned. They prove that ”Whoever denies [rejects / opposes] an Imam : is like one who said : ‘Allaah is one of three.’ “(Fiqh” Kitab at-tahara, vol 3)

    18. Shia scholar Shahid Hussain Fatimi writes in his book Parda Uthta Hai, p.269,

    “History is witness that Abu Bakar, Usman, Aishah, Hafsa, Hassan Basri, Abu Hurayra, Khalid, Muawiyyah, Umar bin A’as, Marwan, ‘Abd al-Rahman…Yazid, Shimar, Abu Hanifah, ‘Abd al-Wahhab Najdi, Bukhari, Shaykh ‘Abd al-Qadir Jilani, and Mirza Hayrat and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadyani all are inspired (gleaners) by Umar in their hatred of Ahl al-Bayt…” (Parda Uthta Hai, p.269)

    Comment: We see that Shia scholar even accuses esteemed scholars of Ahlesunnah such as Shiekh Abd Al-Qadir Jeelani(rah) and Imam Abu Hanifah(rah) for being haters of Ahl al-bayt. Which implies that they are Nasibis and Kafirs as per Shiism, because another Shia scholar Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi states in Mir’at al-`Uqul [24:211] where the word “Nasibi” was used for a man: “If by ‘Nasibi’ it was meant the hater and enemy of the Ahl al-Bayt `alayhim al-salam, which is most obvious, then he is a kafir and his blood is to be spilled unavailingly.”(Mir’at al-`Uqul vol 24, page 211).

  • guest

    III – Ruling of Shiism upon killing Sunnis(whom Shia label as Nasibis), destroying their property and taking over their wealth.

    As it is firmly established that, Shia consider Ahlesunnah(Sunnis) as Nasibis, So let us see the teaching of Shiism regarding killing Sunnis and taking over their property.

    1. In the Shia book Al Hadaiq al Nadhirah of Shaikh Yusuf al Bahrani (1186 AH) Volume 18 Page 156:

    وروى في العلل عن الصحيح عن داود بن فرقد قال: قلت لأبي عبد الله ع: ما تقول في قتل الناصب ؟ قال: حلال الدم ولكن اتقى عليك فإن قدرت أن تقلب عليه حائطا أو تغرقه في ماء لكي لا يشهد به عليك فافعل . قلت فما ترى في ماله ؟ قال: أتوه ما قدرت عليه
    And it is narrated in al Illal from saheeh (chain of narration) from Dawood b. Farqad who said:I said to abi Abdullah (as): “What do you say about killing the nasib?” Imam (as) said: “The blood is halal(permissible) but I fear upon you, so if you are able to bring down upon him a wall or drown him in water so that no one witnesses by it upon you then do so.” I said: “So what do you consider about his property?” Imam (as) said: “Destroy upon it what you are able to.”

    2. In shia book Illal ul Sharai of Shaikh Sadooq (381 AH) Volume 2 Page 601:

    58 – أبي رحمه الله قال: حدثنا سعد بن عبد الله عن أحمد بن محمد عن علي ابن الحكم عن سيف بن عميرة عن داود بن فرقد قال: قلت لأبي عبد الله ع ما تقول في قتل الناصب قال: حلال الدم لكني اتقي عليك فان قدرت أن تقلب عليه حائطا أو تغرقه في ماء لكيلا يشهد به عليك فافعل قلت: فما ترى في ماله قال توه ما قدرت عليه
    58- My father (ra) said: Told us Sa’d b. Abdullah from Ahmad b. Muhammd from Ali ibn al Hakam from Saif b. Umairah from Dawood b. Farqad who said: I said to abi Abdullah (as): “What do you say about killing the nasib?” Imam (as) said: “The blood is halal(permissible) but I fear upon you, so if you are able to bring down upon him a wall or drown him in water so that no one witnesses by it upon you then do so.” I said: “So what do you consider about his property?” Imam (as) said: “Destroy upon it what you are able to.”

    3.
    ومنها – ما رواه الشيخ في الصحيح عن حفص بن البختري عن أبي عبد الله ع قال : (خذ مال الناصب حيثما وجدته وادفع إلينا الخمس
    And from them – what the shaikh narrated in (by) the saheeh/authentic (chain of narration) from Hafs b. al Bakhtari from abi Abdullah (as) who said: “Take wealth of the nasib wherever you find it and send to us the khums (fifth portion).” (Hadaiq al Nadhirah).

    4.
    روى الشيخ في التهذيب في الصحيح عن حفص بن البختري عن أبي عبد الله ع قال : ” خذ مال الناصب حيثما وجدته وادفع إلينا الخمس ” رواه بسند آخر عن معلى بن خنيس عن أبي عبد الله ع مثله
    Narrated the shaikh (Shaikh Tusi) in al Tahdheeb in saheeh/authentic (chain of narration) from Hafs b. al Bakhtari from abi Abdullah (as) who said: “Take wealth of the nasib wherever you find it and send to us the khums (fifth portion).”, narrated by last sanad (chain of narration) Mu’alla b. Khunais from abi Abdullah (as) similar to it.( al Tahdheeb of Tusi).

    5. In Wasail al shia by Shaikh Hurr al Amili it is reported:

    وعن إسحاق بن عمار، قال: قال الصادق عليه السلام: مال الناصب وكل شئ
    يملكه حلال لك، إلا امرأته فإن نكاح أهل الشرك جائز، وذلك أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم
    قال: لا تسبوا أهل الشرك فإن لكل قوم نكاحا، ولولا أنا نخاف عليكم أن يقتل رجل منكم برجل منهم، ورجل منكم خير من ألف رجل منهم، لأمرناكم بالقتل لهم، ولكن
    ذلك إلى الإمام

    And from Ishaq b. Ammar, who said: Imam al Sadiq (as) said: “The wealth of the nasib, and everything he owns, is halal (permissible) for you except his woman for indeed nikah of people of polytheism is legitimate. And that is that Rsool Allah (pbuh) said: Do not abuse the people of polytheism because indeed for every nation there is a nikah, and if I did not fear for you that he murders a man from you with a man from them, while a man from you is better than a thousand men from them, we would have certainly ordered you people to kill them, but that is to the Imam.”(Wasail al shia by Shaikh Hurr al Amili, Volume 11, page 60, Hadith no. 2).

    6. Tahzib al Ahkam of Shaikh Tusi (460 AH) Volume 6 Page 387

    (1153) 274 – أحمد بن محمد عن علي بن الحكم عن فضالة عن سيف عن أبي بكر عن المعلى بن خنيس قال : قال أبو عبد الله ع: خذ مال الناصب حيث ما وجدت وادفع إلينا خمسه
    (1153) 274- Ahmad b. Muhammad from Ali b. al Hakam from Fudhalah from Saif from abi Bakr from al Mu’alla b. Khunais who said: Abu Abdullah (as) said: “Take the wealth of the nasib whereever you found and send to us its fifth portion.”

    7. Shia scholar Nematullah Jazairi states in his book, “Anwar an-Nomaniyah”

    In the Permissibility of Killing them (i.e. Nasibis), and taking over their Money
    You have known that the Ashaab included (or mentioned) the Nasibii with that special meaning [we mentioned] in the chapters of Taharah and Najasah, and his ruling according to them is the same as the Kaffir Al-Harbi (one who fights or is at war with the believers) in most of the rulings; as for what we have mentioned of him of explanation then the ruling would be comprehensive as Al-Saduq [] narrates in Al-‘Ilal …
    I said to Abu ‘Abdillah [‘Alaihi Al Salam]: What do you say regarding killing the Nasibi?
    He replied: His blood is Halal (i.e. it is permissible to kill him), however I fear for you, so if you were able to collapse a wall on him or drown him in water so that there would be no witnesses against you, then do so.
    So I asked: What about his Money (Wealth)?
    He said: Take what you could …”(Anwar an-Nomaniyah, vol 2, page 307).

  • guest

    IV – There Cannot be brotherhood between Shias and non-Shias(i.e Sunnis, etc), as per Shiism.

    1. Esteemed Shia scholar Ayatullah Khomeini states:

    المراد بالمؤمن الشيعة الإمامية الاثني عشرية . وأما الأخبار فما اشتملت على المؤمن فكذلك ، وما اشتملت على الأخ لا تشملهم أيضا لعدم الأخوة بيننا وبينهم بعد وجوب البراءة عنهم وعن مذهبهم وعن أئمتهم ، كما تدل عليه الأخبار واقتضته أصول المذهب…وقال: فإنها في مقام تفسيرها اعتبرت الأخوة فيها ، فغيرنا ليسوا بإخواننا
    What is meant by the term ‘momin’, is Shia Ithna Ash’ari only. As for the ahadith which are applicable on the ‘momin’, so they are meant to be for the Imami shias only. Therefore, the ahadith which mention ‘your brother’ (for example ahadith on backbiting being akin to eating the meat of one’s brother) do not include the non shias (sunnis etc) for there is no brotherhood at all between us Imami shias and the non Shias. In fact, it is absolutely obligatory to do tabarra from them, their schools of thought and their leading scholars, based upon our ahadith which deem it (absolute tabarra from non shias) to be the core of our religion. So whenever brotherhood is implied in religious interpretations, it must be kept in mind that non shias by no means are our brothers.( Makasibul Muhramah by Ayatullah Khomeini, Volume 1 page 250).

    2. Esteemed Shia Ayatullah Khoei states:

    ومن البديهي أنه لا إخوة ولا عصمة بيننا وبين المخالفين
    It is a matter of basic common sense that there is no brotherhood or support/partnership between us shias and the non Shias. (Misbahul fuqahah by Ayatullah Khoei, Volume 1 page 505 )

    3. Esteemed Shia Ayatullah Ali Tabatabai states:

    ودعوى الإيمان والأخوة للمخالف مما يقطع بفساده، والنصوص المستفيضة بل المتواترة ظاهرة في رده، مضافا إلى النصوص المتواترة الواردة عنهم (عليهم السلام) بطعنهم ولعنهم، وأنهم أشر من اليهود والنصارى، وأنجس من الكلاب
    The attribution of iman (belief) and brotherhood towards non-shias is completely invalid. There are explicit and mutawatir ahadith which invalidate this claim, furthermore there are mutawatir ahadith from the Imams (as) mocking and cursing the non shias, as well as calling them worse than Jews and Christians, and filthier than dogs.( Riyadul Masail by Ayatullah Ali Tabatabai, Volume 8 page 68 ).

    4. Esteemed Shia Ayatullah Ahmed bin Muhammad Mahdi AlNaraqi states:

    ودعوى الايمان والأخوة للمخالف مما يقطع بفساده.
    وتؤكده النصوص المتواترة الواردة عنهم في طعنهم ولعنهم وتكفيرهم، وأنهم شر من اليهود والنصارى وأنجس من الكلاب
    The attribution of iman (belief) and brotherhood towards non shias is completely invalid, and this is evidenced by mutawatir ahadith from the Imams (as) mocking, cursing and doing takfeer of the non shias, as well as calling them worse than Jews and Christians, and filthier than dogs.( Mustanad al Shia by Ayatullah Naraqi, Volume 14 page 163)

    5. Esteemed Shia Shaikh Jawahiri states:
    وكيف يتصور الأخوة بين المؤمن والمخالف بعد تواتر الروايات، وتضافر الآيات في وجوب معاداتهم والبراءة منهم» (جواهر الكلام22/62)
    How is it possible to imagine brotherhood between shias and non shias when there are mutawatir ahadith supported by numerous Qur’anic verses that it is obligatory to be hostile to non shias and to do tabarra from them? (Jawahirul Kalam by Shaikh Jawahiri, Volume 22 page 62) .

  • guest

    V – Non-Shias(Sunnis, etc) are worse than Jews and Christians and filthier than dogs, as per Shiism.

    1. Esteemed Shia Ayatullah Ali Tabatabai states:

    ودعوى الإيمان والأخوة للمخالف مما يقطع بفساده، والنصوص المستفيضة بل المتواترة ظاهرة في رده، مضافا إلى النصوص المتواترة الواردة عنهم (عليهم السلام) بطعنهم ولعنهم، وأنهم أشر من اليهود والنصارى، وأنجس من الكلاب
    The attribution of iman (belief) and brotherhood towards non-shias is completely invalid. There are explicit and mutawatir ahadith which invalidate this claim, furthermore there are mutawatir ahadith from the Imams (as) mocking and cursing the non shias, as well as calling them worse than Jews and Christians, and filthier than dogs.( Riyadul Masail by Ayatullah Ali Tabatabai, Volume 8 page 68 ).

    2. Esteemed Shia Ayatullah Ahmed bin Muhammad Mahdi AlNaraqi states:

    ودعوى الايمان والأخوة للمخالف مما يقطع بفساده.
    وتؤكده النصوص المتواترة الواردة عنهم في طعنهم ولعنهم وتكفيرهم، وأنهم شر من اليهود والنصارى وأنجس من الكلاب
    The attribution of iman (belief) and brotherhood towards non shias is completely invalid, and this is evidenced by mutawatir ahadith from the Imams (as) mocking, cursing and doing takfeer of the non shias, as well as calling them worse than Jews and Christians, and filthier than dogs.( Mustanad al Shia by Ayatullah Naraqi, Volume 14 page 163)

    3. Shia scholar Yusuf Al bahrani his book “Hadaiq an-Nadira” states (10/43):

    قد استفاضت الروايات والاخبار عن الائمة الابرار (عليهم السلام) – كما بسطنا عليه الكلام في كتاب الشهاب الثاقب في بيان معنى الناصب – بكفر المخالفين ونصبهم وشركهم وان الكلب واليهودى خير منهم

    “Widespread (or plenty) narrations and stories from righteous imams (alaihuma salam) – as I elaborated in the book “Shihab as-Saqib fi bayan mana an-Nasib” – (testify) disbelief of opponents, their nasibizm, and their polytheism. And Dog and Jews are better than them”. (“Hadaiq an-Nadira” states vol 10, page 43)

    4. Abu Abdallah has been quoted by Shia narrators as saying: “The Nasibi (Shia use this term to refer to a Sunni) is worse than the Jew. It was said: And how is that so, O son of the Messenger of Allah? He said: The Jew denied the status of Prophethood (of Prophet Mohammad), while the Nasibi denied the status of Al-Imamah.” (Al-Naafi’ Yawmal-Hashr: Jamaalud-Din al-Suyuri, p.42)

    5. The Shi’ites narrate regarding Sunni Muslims “Although Allah, the Exalted, has not created a creature worse than a dog, yet a Nasibi(label for Sunni) is worse than even a dog.” (Haqqul Yakeen (Persian) Vol. 2, p. 516).

  • guest

    Is this Mehdisauras or Guilt of Massacring Hussein ibn Ali (ra) n his Family, happy dance !?

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nt4d331hSks

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Hx_LaHOCXmQ

  • guest
  • guest

    Shia Ayatollah: Ayatollah Khomeini is Better Than Prophets of God

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SX-jduurOFw

  • guest

    Ayatollat Khomeini and the finality of Prophethood

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P239hREdwpA

  • guest

    Ayatollat Khomeini’s funeral

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tmMxH1yerXo

  • guest

    Truth about khomeini EXPOSED BY HIS OWN SHIA COMPANION

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TYe30nD5WDc

  • nagy_michael2

    This is from the horse’s mouth one of the top Iranian regime when asked about his opinions about who is in control.
    Basically he is saying that Iran is in charge of Hezbollah and at the same time using it as it pleases in middle east and all over the world. M8 followers you have no shame and no pride. Also please do not accuse M14 of supporting the Takfiris because its so stupid of you accusing Christians especially of being followers of these criminal thugs.
    Here is what Ali Khedery said:
    Ali Khedery, who served as a special assistant to five US ambassadors and a senior adviser to three heads of US Central Command between 2003 and 2009, told The New York Times: “For the Iranians, really, the gloves are off.”

    He highlighted the role of Qassem Suleimani, the head of the Qods Force, the foreign arm of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps. Qods is directing sectarian militias in both Iraq and Syria. At the same time, Suleimani is nurturing the guerilla proxy Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis rebel group in Yemen — in other words, he is controlling powerful Shia proxies all across the Middle East.