Sectarian divide hampers U.S. effort to build anti I.S. coalition

A conference to discuss how to combat the Islamic State is under way in Paris. Made up of 26 countries, including the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Russia, it aims to show a united front on fighting the militant group.
A conference to discuss how to combat the Islamic State is under way in Paris. Made up of 26 countries, including the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Russia, it aims to show a united front on fighting the militant group.

U.S. efforts to build a broad coalition to combat Islamic State on Monday ran straight into the sectarian chasm that has divided the Middle East for centuries, with Arab allies disagreeing over whether Iraq’s neighbors—particularly Iran and Syria—should have a role in any military campaign.

A group of 26 countries gathering in Paris—including the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Russia—vowed to back the fight against the Sunni extremist organization “by any means necessary, including appropriate military assistance.”

But a day after the U.S. said Arab states were willing to participate in airstrikes, Arab countries attending the Paris meeting gave no sign they were ready to join the military campaign. The U.S. also faced criticism from Russia, Syria’s top international ally, which insisted airstrikes on Syria must be coordinated with Damascus and Tehran.

After the international meeting concluded, the U.S. military said Monday night it made its first airstrike in Iraq targeting Islamic militants as part of the expanded mission announced last week. The airstrike hit a single fighting position set up by Islamic State militants that was firing on Iraqi security forces southwest of Baghdad, officials said.

Previously, the military was limited to strikes designed to assist with humanitarian missions, such as driving militants from Sinjar, to defend Iraqi infrastructure, or to protect U.S. personnel and facilities.

The hesitancy of many of the Middle East’s major Sunni leaders, including in Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates, to back military operations is driven, in part, by a belief American airstrikes against the Islamic State will benefit the region’s three main Shiite-dominated governments in Iran, Iraq and Syria, according to U.S. and Arab officials involved in the deliberations.

That debate highlighted how the Obama administration’s plans to lead the international coalition against Islamic State have plunged it more deeply into a regional feud between Sunni and Shiite states.

Sensitive to Sunni Arab states’ concerns, Secretary of State John Kerry and other U.S. officials have publicly ruled out in recent days cooperating militarily with Tehran and Damascus in rooting out Islamic State, though Washington acknowledged private discussions have been held with Iran’s rulers.
Such a stance raises the possibility that Iran’s Islamist rulers and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime could attempt to sabotage U.S. military operations, as they did in Iraq in the years following the George W. Bush administration’s overthrow of Saddam Hussein in 2003.

Iraq's President Fuad Masum, left, with Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal, center, and Iraqi Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari. Michel Euler/Reuters
Iraq’s President Fuad Masum, left, with Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal, center, and Iraqi Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari. Michel Euler/Reuters

In recent days, leaders of Iraqi Shiite militias close to Tehran, including Kata’b Hezbollah and the Mahdi Army, have publicly warned Washington that U.S. soldiers could be targeted if the White House pushes ahead with its military offensive against Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL.

“If you come back, we will be back too,” radical Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who commands the Mahdi Army, said in a televised statement Monday.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei put the Obama administration on the defensive ahead of the talks by publicly claiming his government has rejected numerous overtures from Washington to jointly cooperate against Islamic State.

Iraq’s new leaders reprimanded the U.S. and its European and Arab allies for not inviting Iran to attend the Paris conference.

“We had insisted for Iran to be there and we regret their absence,” Iraqi Foreign Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari said in Paris, adding that Tehran had provided his government with “significant support” in fighting Islamic State.

Mr. Kerry acknowledged private discussions with Iran about Iraq and said the U.S. remained open to future discussions, including next week at the annual United Nations General Assembly in New York.

But the American diplomat ruled out any military cooperation with Iran in Iraq and Syria and intelligence sharing. He also acknowledged that his opposition to Tehran attending the Paris conference was driven, in part, by threats made by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to boycott the meetings if Iranian officials attended.

“We’re not coordinating with Iran, but as I said, we’re open to have a conversation at some point in time if there’s a way to find something constructive,” Mr. Kerry said Monday.

The role of the Assad regime in combating Islamic State is also presenting a dilemma for the Obama administration.

U.S. officials have rejected Syrian overtures to coordinate military strikes against Islamic State.

But Mr. Assad’s allies, particularly Russia, warned on Monday that excluding the Syrian government risks fueling more conflict in the region.

“One cannot but feel concerned by publicly stated intentions to attack the [Islamic State] positions in Syria’s territory without interaction with the Syrian government,” Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in Paris. “Syria, as well as Iran, are our natural allies in the fight.”

Mr. Kerry, as in the case with Iran, offered somewhat contradictory statements on the U.S. positions toward Syria. He ruled out cooperation, but also said the U.S. would “communicate’ with Mr. Assad’s government to avoid any potential clashes with Syrian forces as the campaign against Islamic State gathered momentum.

“There are all kinds of ways of communicating to avoid mistakes or disasters,” Mr. Kerry said.

Administration officials said at a briefing in Washington later Monday that American forces would respond if Mr. Assad used antiaircraft weapons against U.S. planes.

Current and former U.S. officials and Arab diplomats worry the buildup of the military campaign against Islamic State risks mirroring Washington’s interactions with Tehran and Damascus in the months both before and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

At the time, the Bush administration held extensive talks with Iranian officials to discuss the creation of a stable Iraq in the wake of Hussein’s fall. U.S. officials also discussed Iraq with Mr. Assad’s government, particularly concerning the flow of foreign fighters.

As the U.S. occupation of Iraq dragged on, however, Iran and Syria actively worked to undermine the U.S.’s goals of creating a stable and democratic government in Iraq, according to current and former U.S. officials. Iran and Syria have denied supporting extremist groups in Iraq.
U.S. officials said so far, Iran’s government hasn’t attempted to interrupt American military operations against the militants.

One U.S. official said intelligence showed that the commander of the Revolutionary Guard’s overseas operations, Gen. Qasem Soleimani, has explicitly ordered Iraqi Shiite militias not to target American personnel, arguing the weakening of Sunni militant groups was in Tehran’s interest.

Still, U.S. officials have voiced concerns that Iran could change its stance if they view American military operations in Iraq and Syria as posing a threat to Iran’s core objectives and the rule of Mr. Assad.

Mr. Khamenei on Monday indicated that this could eventually be the case.

“I said we will not accompany America in this matter because they have got dirty intentions and hands,” Iran’s most powerful figure said in a televised address. “They see pretexts to interfere in Iraq and Syria, just as they did in Pakistan, where [the U.S.] can commit any crime it wants.”

At Monday’s session, key U.S. allies, particularly those in the Middle East, gave no sign they were ready to commit to a military campaign in Iraq or Syria.

Even the U.K., one of Washington’s most reliable allies, is hesitant. U.K. Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond said his country would play a “leading role” in the fight against Islamic state but conceded: “We haven’t made a decision yet about how we will best contribute to the coalition.”

French President François Hollande, who hosted Monday’s conference, said Syria’s “democratic” rebel forces “must be supported by all means.”
So far, France has answered Washington’s call for military intervention. The French began to mobilize their Air Force on Monday, deploying reconnaissance jets over Iraq, French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said.

“Get ready to intervene,” Mr. Le Drian told French forces gathered at the Al Dhafra air base in the United Arab Emirates.




19 responses to “Sectarian divide hampers U.S. effort to build anti I.S. coalition”

  1. As always America make up bad stories on ISIS.As always they will blaming first before they are going to killing and destroyed people.America advocate Jews Protocol…We will tell bad story every days and people will eccept.America now fully at the hand of Zionist Jews.But Arab now is the most ignorant people in the world.They know nothing a bout bad plan that created on them in White House.It is easy too fooling an ignorant people.They are doing well in protecting their crown.Their greediness on politic among themselves lead to their fall.The worse they are not protecting their religion.They even corrupted that religion in order to gain politic power,including Syiah..All Arabs now already dead.

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      You may have a point there Zabada … but I think it’s more like:
      ‘Oh yes, we all agree that we have to stop these particular megalomaniacs. Yes, yes.’
      (‘psssstt … sotto voce … let the Yanks do it, then if some things don’t work we can blame them again, and as usual Israel too.’)

      1. sweetvirgo Avatar

        It’s really pathetic that zabada sympathizes with ISIS. He should go join them.

        1. ISIS is enough..if i join..American and all Arab politicians will piss on their guns.Khah..khah..khah.

          1. 5thDrawer Avatar

            LOL … you’ve got a comic streak in you … One Up. ;-))

        2. $89733098 Avatar

          its just as pathetic that u sympathize with hezbsatan. Repeat after me H Y P O C R I T E!
          End of lesson for today.

    2. sweetvirgo Avatar

      ISIS is the one that corrupted their own religion. Your disdain for America has blinded you to what’s really going on…the true murderer’s such as ISIS. I can’t believe you sympathize with them that much?? It’s really sad.

      1. As I said at their situation,they have no choice.I not sided any body.I sided to democracy.But people at the area is not understand democracy.Their leaders planted on them dictatorship before.Hence they will prolong that kind of politic.Sunni can,t live side by side with syiah.Syiah is an oppressor political religion, a cult.They will fight syiah to the end.You still not understand.

        1. sweetvirgo Avatar

          So the only choice ISIS has is to kill?? Rape?? Force people to convert?? Pay a tax?? Behead innocent people and post it on youtube?? This is the only choice they have or is it what they want to do??

          1. All the story are always America is using Jews Protocol tactic…..We will tell lies story every days..and people will accept..many of the stories no picture to proven.when America deserve to killing alqaida,Osalama Laden they are faking his speech.Osama himself denied .He not involve on 9 11.Now there are no News on brutal Assad.America not intervene in syria, even Assad do more atrocities,condone ethnics cleansing,using chemical weapons in war.even so America not intervene in Syria .America is going to prolong the a war in order to destroy Arabs on behalf of Israel.You are not genius to know secrets of world affairs .You are non senses.

          2. Innoncent people..? after America dethrone Saddam,,sunni fate is worse in the hand of Syiah..i m not going to tell you what Syiah have to them.I m not America whocreated false story in order to destroy others.Syiah is sn oppressing religion and people,even among themselves.

          3. $89733098 Avatar

            funny how u don’t show the same outrage when others kill. hypocrisy at its finest.

      2. You ask God him self for what your claim and talk.Pray to him only.

  2. lebanesesam Avatar

    I don’t understand this, why are there groups or countries out there that are opposing on hitting ISIL/Da3esh? I thought everyone is against their ideology from Islam, Christian, Shia, Druze, Sunni etc.. Are those groups/countries hiding something? Was ISIL/Da3esh created by them? Are they funding them?

  3. 5thDrawer Avatar

    Obama trying to rally Congress “before lawmakers leave town Friday for an almost two-month recess” … it says in the article I can’t comment on. But if he doesn’t, we know the military will be ‘in charge’ for the next two months. Nice timing. 😉

  4. … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

Leave a Reply