Kurdish militia launches assault to evict Syrian army from the city of Hasaka

Share:

HASAKA SYRIA, MAPThe Kurdish YPG militia launched a major assault on Monday to seize the last government-controlled parts of the northeastern Syrian city of Hasaka after calling on pro-government militias to surrender, Kurdish forces and residents said.

They said Kurdish forces began the offensive after midnight to take the southern district of East Nashwa, close to where a security compound is located, near the governor’s office.

The fighting this week in Hasaka, divided into zones of Kurdish and Syrian government control, marks the most violent confrontation between the Kurdish YPG militia and Damascus in more than five years of civil war. It forms part of a broader battle for control of the long border area abutting Turkey.

After a morning lull in fighting, fierce clashes broke out again across the city, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said. The powerful YPG militia has captured almost all of east Ghwairan, the only major Arab neighborhood still in government hands.

The YPG is at the heart of a U.S.-led campaign against the Islamic State militant group in Syria and controls swaths of the north, where Kurdish groups associated with the militia have set up their own government since the Syrian war began in 2011.

NATO member Turkey, facing a Kurdish insurgency of its own, is concerned about attempts to extend Syrian Kurdish control westward along its border. Turkey is currently allowing a rebel Syrian force under the banner of the Free Syrian Army to assemble on its soil for an attack on an Islamic State-held town, seeking to deny control to the YPG.

The Syrian army deployed warplanes against the main armed Kurdish group for the first time during the war last week, prompting a U.S.-led coalition to scramble aircraft to protect American special operations ground forces.

War planes were seen in the skies above Hasaka again on Monday, but did not drop bombs, the Observatory said.

Syrian state media accused the YPG-affiliated security force known as the Asayish of violating a ceasefire and said its members had torched government buildings in Hasaka.

It accused the Asayish of igniting the violence through escalating “provocations”, including the bombing of army positions in Hasaka, and said the Asayish aimed to take control of the city.

“WE WILL NOT RETREAT”

The YPG denied it had entered into a truce. It distributed leaflets and made loudspeaker calls across the city urging army personnel and pro-government militias to hand over their weapons.

“To all the elements of the regime and its militias who are besieged in the city, you are targeted by our units,” leaflets distributed by the YPG said.

“This battle is decided and we will not retreat … We call on you to give up your weapons or count yourselves dead.”

The YPG, known as the People’s Protection Units and linked to Kurdish rebels who fight the Turkish state, appeared intent on leaving a nominal Syrian government presence confined to within a security zone in the heart of the city, where several key government buildings are located, Kurdish sources said.

The complete loss of Hasaka would be a big blow to President Bashar al-Assad’s government and would also dent efforts by Moscow, which had sought through a major military intervention last year to help Damascus regain lost territory and prevent new rebel gains.

Kurdish forces have expanded their control of the city despite the bombing of several locations by Syrian jets.

Thousands of civilians in the ethnically mixed city, including members of the Christian community, have fled to villages in the countryside as the fighting intensified, residents said.

The confrontation appears to have undone tacit understandings between the YPG and the Syrian army that had kept the city relatively calm.

Hasaka’s governor told state media after the flare-up of violence the military had armed the YPG with weapons and tanks to fight jihadist elements but had not expected them to turn against them.

Hasaka’s population, swelled by displaced Syrians fleeing areas that fell under Islamic State control, is broadly divided along ethnic lines, with Kurds mainly in the city’s eastern neighborhoods and Arabs in the southern parts.

Share:

Comments

58 responses to “Kurdish militia launches assault to evict Syrian army from the city of Hasaka”

  1. There is no reason why the Kurds can’t have their own state. They are certainly more deserving than the useless Palies.

    1. They will never get a state cause the Turks and the Iranian will never agree to that.
      As I wrote before, the Kurds will be sacrificed for ME stability.

      1. Sadly, this might be true. But a de facto stae is better than nothing.

        1. “To all the elements of the regime and its militias who are besieged in the city, you are targeted by our units,” leaflets distributed by the YPG said.
          “This battle is decided and we will not retreat … We call on you to give up your weapons or count yourselves dead.”

          Will Hezbullah be helping with martyrs in Hasaka? Or are they too busy retreating from Aleppo?
          TOW Skittles
          http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bb3_1471989994
          SAA and NDF to leave Hasakah and never come back
          Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=524_1471992135#PGVm56ezbHORXSw9.99
          http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=524_1471992135

          Even with air power, Assad and company are getting their asses handed to them. Ouch.

          Please excuse the snackbars.

      2. Will Israel be sacrificed for ME stability?

        1. It will have nothing to do with ME’s stability but when its oil runs out.

          Got it Oh Yeah?

      3. Hind Abyad Avatar
        Hind Abyad

        Yes, US and Israel supporting Kurd

        “RECENT CHRISTIAN KILLINGS by Kurds”

        Ongoing Kurdish Terror Attacks Against Aramean Christians in Syria. (Hakassah)

        URGENT APPEAL TO MEDIA, POLITICIANS, EMBASSIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS
        http://wca-ngo.org/our-work/238-files/syria-file/547-ongoing-kurdish-terror-attacks-against-aramean-christians-in-syria

    2. Kurds are pawns used by the USA and IsraHell.

      In this conversation James and Sibel discuss Turkey’s battle against the Kurds and how the Kurdish population are being used by the US and Israel as pawns in a complex chess game.

      http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2015/08/13/the-eyeopener-report-sibel-edmonds-on-turkey-syria-the-kurdish-question/

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gezoESK0qX8

      1. Anybody calling himself “The Eyopener” is necessarily a moron and a fraud.

        1. I don’t see “The Eyepener” anywhere.

          1. What would you do without your witty sarcasm, pal? Nah, probably would be just as dumb as you are with it.

          2. Like I said … More insults. More diluting of topic. More trolling.

          3. Yep, “diluting”. And your killer witticisms re: misprints are sure to thicken the brew.

          4. And more diluting, trolling.

        2. Oh Yeah Avatar

          “An Open Letter to James Corbett” – http://youtu.be/vOQvMY0JlwA

          http://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-letter-to-james-corbett/
          “Yeah, people are stupid, aren’t they, James? Thirty-four comments and only one person brought up fakery.
          But hey, in your Pentagon video it took ten times as many commenters to find the one who ‘noticed’ what was really going on, i.e., that you were using NLP to plant the transparent falsehood that a 757 jetliner (American Flight 77, to be specific) struck the Pentagon – not only a falsehood but an impossibility by the laws of physics.”

          1. You see? I never heard of this fella before. And yet I was spot-on. The fail-safe rule is that if “Omega” links to somebody, he must be a worthless piece of shit. 🙂

          2. Oh Yeah Avatar

            Any link of “Omega” is associated with some kind of conspiracy theory, that what he feeds on.
            Without these links, he is nada!

            As you perhaps remember I’m not bothered by his comments because I blocked “Omega”, which in practice means that his eventual comments to me, do not end up in my e-mail basket or are visible when I am logged on.

            However I always can see “Omegas” new comment in “Recent Comments”…..

            * Omega There you go … WikiLeaks, Hillary-Gulen Intimate Ties & How the Clintons Gave Birth to…
            Turkey Targets Gulen-Inspired Projects Around the World · 9 minutes ago
            * Omega WikiLeaks, Hillary-Gulen Intimate Ties & How the Clintons Gave Birth to Mullah Gulen’s…
            Turkey Targets Gulen-Inspired Projects Around the World · 10 minutes ago
            * Omega Jews trying to steal more money. How is that news?
            Victims of attacks in Israel lose U.S. appeal vs Lebanese Canadian Bank · 12 minutes ago
            * Omega US pushes regime change in South Sudan; UN intervenes to protect rebel leader…
            South Sudan opposition leader in Khartoum for treatment, Sudan says · 14 minutes ago

          3. They are conspiracies but not theories. All valid and credible sources.

            Glad to see you can read my comments in “Recent comments”.

            Now, F off wuss.

          4. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Oh yes, look who’s talking about links.. i learned, if one deviates from the script they’re smeared as “Assadist” or paid Kremlin trolls. It’s beyond tedious

          5. Lui, c’est le con des cons.

          6. Oh Yeah sees nothing. He’s stroking you and you love it asking for more – as long as it’s an attempt at discrediting what I post or write. He found the personal blog of a pot-head and even though you would negate such news source, you forced it to be awed.

          7. Nice blog by pot-heat Allan C. Weisbecker. Here he is in a outhouse.

            http://www.banditobooks.com/images/homepage/tobouthouse.jpg

            http://blog.banditobooks.com/about/

            p.s. – your comment says absolutely nothing.
            p.p.s – my post was about Sibel Edmonds
            p.p.p.s – why don’t you address me directly coward?

          8. Nice blog by pot-heat Allan Weisbecker. Here he is in a outhouse.

            http://www.banditobooks.com/images/homepage/tobouthouse.jpg

            About Flight 77 …

            Where are the wings?

            http://i68.tinypic.com/29mq0so.jpg

            Nice back-hole (“back-hole”?! – Y K drools)

            http://i67.tinypic.com/1r2i9u.jpg

          9. Allan Weisbecker seems to confirm my opinion that no airplane hit the Pentagon (due to the laws of Physics and the impossible flight path).

            What is the point of your comment? That James Corbett is a disinformation agent? I can careless as my comment was about Sibel Edmonds; not him.

            About Flight 77 …

            Where are the wings?

            http://i68.tinypic.com/29mq0so.jpg

            Nice back-hole

            http://i67.tinypic.com/1r2i9u.jpg

          10. Rudy1947 Avatar

            http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/compare/c130crash.html

            Like much of the rest of the aircraft, the wings were also destroyed.

          11. Airplane or not, I don’t understand how a novice pilot descended the plane 7,000 feet in 2 minutes while doing a 280 degrees banked turn into the Pentagon or, most importantly, why/how the Air Force failed to defend its HQ?

            What’s interesting with the Aziri C-130 crash is that … a military transport airplane crashed into a 10 story high building (made from regular concrete) and the building stood. Yet, in NYC, on 9/11/01, reinforced concrete/steel skyscrapers that were designed/built to withstand multiples airliner accident/attacks collapsed like a deck of car.

          12. Rudy1947 Avatar

            A novice pilot who’s only concern is to aim a plane, not learning to land or take off, just steer.

            The C-130 was coming in for a landing, much slower than the 757, weighs a third less than a 757 and is over smaller.

            The Twin Towers were not made of solid concrete.

          13. That’s a naive argument. Veteran pilots attested Flight 77’s flight path is impossible to do. Why didn’t the Air Force protects its HQ?

            I know they were not made of solid concrete. WTC 1, 2 should not have collapsed the way they did; even if they were hit by airliners twice the size, weight and speed. The laws of physics don’t add up. WTC 7’s collapsing from WTC 1 and 2 debris and fire is even more non-sensical.

          14. Rudy1947 Avatar

            Before the attack the Pentagon was secured via guards requiring passes to enter. It was not protected by AA.

            The 757 is quite capable of the maneuvers you described.

            Went through this before with you, 15 stories of concrete floors and broken steel will then collapse the 16th floor and the domino effect from there.

          15. You’re being an idiot. How do you expect guards to protect the Pentagon against air attacks? Unauthorized planes, especially in the vicinity of the Pentagon, were and still are a matter of the air force.

            Retired US Navy Top Gun pilots attest the flight path of Flight 77 was impossible but you must know better.

            Commander Kolstad is especially critical of the account of American Airlines Flight 77 that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon. He says, At the Pentagon, the pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying. I have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757s and 767s and I could not have flown it the way the flight path was described. Commander Kolstad adds, I was also a Navy fighter pilot and Air Combat Instructor and have experience flying low altitude, high speed aircraft. I could not have done what these beginners did. Something stinks to high heaven! — U.S. Navy Top Gun pilot, Commander Ralph Solstad

            You went through nothing, you parroted and continue to parrot the forced narrative. The domino effect is only possible is the ground and mid level structure is weakened.

          16. Rudy1947 Avatar

            Prior to 9/11 there was never a threat of an aerial attack nor was one considered. This Arlington, VA, not the ME. At no time did I ever see anything other than security guards nor did anyone see the need.

            As far as the pilots are concerned, they were just outdone by a novice. The are eye witness accounts as to a large aircraft hitting the Pentagon.

            And yes we did go through the falling concrete floors. Obviously you needed to be reminded.

          17. No aerial attack prior to 9/11 but plenty of NORAD exercises in case it happened. Yet, nothing was done. There never was an aerial attack in the ME.

            Retired US Navy Top Gun pilots outdone by notice – do you hear yourself? If an airplane hit the Pentagon, it did not fly the “7,000 feet down in 2 minutes with a 280 degrees banked turn” path.

            Again, we went through nothing. You parroted the forced narrative.

          18. Rudy1947 Avatar

            “There never was an aerial attack in the ME.” LOL, tell me another bedtime story daddy.
            NORAD exercises would be from a military attack, not a commercial airliner.

            Let see turn until with a downward push on the stick and try it again. The pilot was not trying to pass a flight school test or be concerned about safety. His concern was hitting the Pentagon.

            And yes we did go though the collapse of the WTC.

          19. LOL, tell me another bedtime story daddy.

            When was there an aerial attack in the ME? I am talking about attack, not accident.

            “daddy” – I can’t fathom going down that personal hole of yours.

            NORAD exercises would be from a military attack, not a commercial airliner.

            An attack is an attack, regardless it’s coming from a commercial airline, a foreign military jet or a private citizen in his Cessna.

            NORAD exercise had jet crashing into building

            -> http://www.cnn.COM/2004/US/04/19/norad.exercise/

            Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York

            -> https://hcgroups.wordpress.COM/2009/06/14/two-days-before-911-military-exercise-simulated-suicide-hijack-targeting-new-york/

            NORAD Exercise a Year Before 9/11 Simulated a Pilot Trying to Crash a Plane into a New York Skyscraper–The United Nations Headquarters

            -> http://shoestring911.blogspot.CA/2010/07/norad-exercise-year-before-911.html

            Let see turn right with a downward push on the stick and try it again. The pilot was not trying to pass a flight school test or be concerned about safety. His concern was hitting the Pentagon.

            (LAUGHING)

            And yes we did go though the collapse of the WTC.

            Keep repeating that to yourself.

          20. Rudy1947 Avatar

            Let’s see, 6 day war, Yon Kippur war, Libya, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran. I suppose these attacks there were just kites with firecrackers.

            Prior to 9/11 there was little or no concern about commercial airlines being used a guided missiles. In hindsight, they should have. But hindsight is always 20/20 as your blogsights insinuate.
            If you wanted to say the USA was unprepared for such an attack, the answer would be obvious. But prior to 9/11 the Pentagon was not protected with AA.

            Happy to see you finally remember.

          21. They rammed airplanes into buildings in the 6 days war, Yom Kippur, Libya, Lebanon, Iraq and Iran? Show when and where.

            If there was no concern, why did NORAD exercise for it? I posted more than one source, you found something to question in one of them and use that as your argument; lame.

            The entire USA’s airspace was and is protected by the Air Force; before and after 9/11. Flight 93 in PA was shot down by a US military jet. Why not at the Pentagon?

            Where did you read me say I remember?

          22. Rudy1947 Avatar

            “They” fire many weapons upon their enemies, not sure of any suicide attacks, although some what likely.

            The military tries to examine anything plausible, but a commercial airline attack was not considered eminent.

            Flight 93 was not shot down by the AirForce, but the passengers prevented the aircraft from hitting their target.

          23. “They” fire many weapons upon their enemies, not sure of any suicide attacks, although some what likely.

            You said Let’s see, 6 day war, Yon Kippur war, Libya, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran.

            Basically, you made that up. Nobody has ever rammed airplanes into buildings in the ME.

            The military tries to examine anything plausible, but a commercial airline attack was not considered eminent.

            Your government gave that lame excuse and you repeat it, ad nauseam.

            http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-military-drills-of-september-11th-why-a-new-investigation-is-needed/6906

            Flight 93 was not shot down by the AirForce, but the passengers prevented the aircraft from hitting their target.

            That’s the forced narrative, again. Flight 93 was indeed shot down by a US military jet. Eyewitnesses in the area did not see an airplane going down the ground and the debris were spread over 8 miles.

          24. Rudy1947 Avatar

            The wars did occur, there were aerial attacks, and the occurrences are documented many times. Have no idea what you are trying to convince me of.

            No evidence but heresy or fairy tales as far as anyone shooting down flight 93.

          25. When you said “Prior to 9/11 there was never a threat of an aerial attack nor was one considered. This Arlington, VA, not the ME.”, I thought you meant aerial attacks similar to 9/11 happened in the ME. Not sure why you didn’t clarify when I asked and repeated myself but there was a miscommunication.

            Can you explain how debris of Flight 93 were found up to 8 miles away?

          26. Rudy1947 Avatar

            That’s right. The ME has many examples of aerial attacks and many examples of the defensive measures, but not at the Pentagon prior to 9/11. I thought a PhD would understand the term aerial attack. Then again, English verbiage and grammar are not part of the curriculum.

            Check out other photos of airplane crashes at high velocity. It seems that total destruction is unfortunately quite ordinary.

          27. You could have clarified yourself after I kept asking/repeating “ramming an airplane into building” à la 9/11, don’t you think?

            I have; none had debris 8 miles away. None.

          28. Rudy1947 Avatar

            Perhaps a chemical formula would have been better. An aerial attack is an attack from the air.

            8 miles away? OK, gotta see that reference.

          29. Perhaps. I know what an aerial attack is. There was a miscommunication: when you said this is VA not the ME, I thought you said similar attacks happened in the ME. You did not clarify it either after I asked/repeated it – adding to the confusion.

            Reference for the 8 miles away debris:

            http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/attack/flight93site.html

    3. Oh Yeah Avatar

      The only reason why the Kurds can’t have their own state is clearly seen on the map showing the Kurdish-inhabited area.
      In other words the Republic of Iraq, Islamic Republic of Iran, Republic of Turkey and Syrian Arab Republic will have to amputate the areas from its map…..

      It will be too much to swallow for the Arab Umma to have an additional ‘cancerous growth’ in the middle of the Arab Umma.

      1. No idiot, the reason why Kurds never had, don’t have and will never have a land is because they have been lied to by the West since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. Fight and we’ll give you a land was/is the bs they’ve been told all along.

    4. Hind Abyad Avatar
      Hind Abyad

      Shut up with the Palies insufferable Zionist racialism

      1. The US labels them as “moderate” and it’s good to go.

  2. Huge mistake! Kurds can not fight Russian air force and if they believe the US would help as it helps fight IS ,they are wrong.
    The US would not confront Russia for the sake of Kurds.

    1. Sadly, the US currently doesn’t seem ready to confront Russia for the sake of anything or anyone.

    2. I was really hoping to see some F-22 take out a couple Assad airforce. The US has issued warning, I would assume they are directed towards Russia above all, to not fly the friendly skies around US special ops, or, it could be another Obummer red-line.
      How much will Russia sacrifice to get all of Syria for Assad, when he is the biggest part of the problem and why it will never end. I would also hope the US would offer cover for potential Iranian attacks, because they will hate to have neighbors that are not under its thumb.

      1. Hind Abyad Avatar
        Hind Abyad

        Ha Hah…!

    3. Oh Yeah Avatar

      The US would not confront Russia for the sake of Kurds, but they are gladly licking the Turkish ass at the Turkish Parliament – Joe Biden: Exiled cleric will be ‘top of agenda’.

  3. Kurds have been used and abused since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire for the promise of a land somewhere. The Land never come and never will.

  4. Kurds have been used and abused since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire for the promise of a land somewhere. The Land never come and never will.

    In this conversation James and Sibel discuss Turkey’s battle against the Kurds and how the Kurdish population are being used by the US and Israel as pawns in a complex chess game.

    http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2015/08/13/the-eyeopener-report-sibel-edmonds-on-turkey-syria-the-kurdish-question/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gezoESK0qX8

Leave a Reply