Putin labels U.S. support for Syria rebels illegal

Share:

putin madRussian President Vladimir Putin on Sunday branded U.S. support for rebel forces in Syria as illegal and ineffective, saying U.S.-trained rebels were leaving to join Islamic State with weapons supplied by Washington.

In an interview with U.S. networks recorded ahead of a meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama, Putin said Syrian President Bashar al-Assad deserved international support as he was fighting terrorist organizations.

Obama and Putin are scheduled to talk on Monday after Putin addresses the United Nations, although White House and Kremlin officials have disagreed on what the two leaders will discuss and even who initiated the meeting.

“In my opinion, provision of military support to illegal structures runs counter to the principles of modern international law and the United Nations Charter,” he said in an excerpt of an interview with U.S. television networks CBS and PBS released by the Kremlin.

Russia has stepped up its military involvement in Syria in recent weeks, with U.S. officials accusing Moscow of sending combat aircraft, tanks and other equipment to help the Syrian army.

Russia’s sudden military build-up this month in support of Assad and a refugee crisis that has spilled over from the region into Europe have lent new urgency to attempts to resolve the Syria conflict.

The new U.S. tack on Syria could bring together Russia, Saudi Arabia and countries such as Turkey and Qatar, which support Syrian opposition groups.

U.S.-Russian relations have slumped to a post-Cold War low over the Ukraine crisis, though the two sides shares concerns about the threat posed by Islamic State, while disagreeing on the approach.

Putin says Damascus should be included in international efforts to fight (IS), a demand the United States rejects, and he criticized U.S. plans to train up to 5,400 Syrian rebels to fight Islamic State.

“It turns out that only 60 of these fighters have been properly trained, and as few as four or five people actually carry weapons,” he said. “The rest of them have deserted with the American weapons to join ISIS,” he said referring to Islamic State.

Critics have urged Obama to be more decisive in the Middle East and Syria, where the United Nations has said 250,000 people have died after four years of conflict, and say lack of a clear American policy has given Islamic State opportunities to expand.

Putin said Russia’s support for the Assad government was based on the U.N. Charter.

“We have been providing assistance to legitimate government entities only,” he said. “As of today it has taken the form of weapons supplies to the Syrian government, personnel training and humanitarian aid to the Syrian people.”

REUTERS

Share:

Comments

11 responses to “Putin labels U.S. support for Syria rebels illegal”

  1. nagy_michael2 Avatar
    nagy_michael2

    Wait til Trump takes over he will maul you like a dog you are..

    1. $10 Bagel Avatar

      Nobody, not even Trump, is going to outsmart Putin.

      1. If you are paying $10 a bagel then you’re not very smart

        1. $10 Bagel Avatar

          Don’t be upset that you can’t afford a good bagel.

          1. Price doesn’t determine quality.
            If you want to pay $10 For something, most can get for $1 and It’s equal or better quality.
            So please explain how you are smart?

  2. Reasonableman Avatar
    Reasonableman

    PUTIN IS PRAGMATIST, NOT ANTI ZIONIST.

    http://nonalignedmedia.com/2015/09/mixed-signals-from-moscow-putins-russia-israel-and-the-middle-east/

    Those salivating over the introduction of Russia with engaged military forces in Syria, this has nothing to do with supporting the Arabs right to self-determination or containing Zionist aggregation against Syria or vent the support of the Palestine cause.
    An insightful article “Mixed Signals from Moscow: Putin’s Russia, Israel and the Middle East” by Brandon Martinez.
    “Russia under Putin’s leadership has pursued a delicate balance between ideological support as well as economic and military cooperation with Israel on the one hand, and cashing in on lucrative oil, gas, nuclear energy and military contracts with several Arab/Muslim states on the other.
    Despite living in Israel, many of these Russian-Israelis vote in Russian elections, and a good number of them cast their ballot for Putin. At a 2011 dialogue conference featuring organizations representing the major religious and ethnic groups in Russia, Putin stated that Israel is “a special state to us” because it is “practically a Russian-speaking country.”[5] Russian-speaking Israelis form the base of the ultra-Zionist Israel Beiteinu political party[6], headed by Israel’s former foreign affairs minister Avigdor Lieberman who recently called for “disloyal” Arab citizens of Israel to be “beheaded.”[7]
    During a 2013 joint press conference, Putin and Netanyahu both affirmed that ties between Russia and Israel are getting ‘stronger and stronger.’[8] Putin said that “our relationship with Israel is both friendly and mutually beneficial.” He stressed that Russia and Israel cooperate in a “wide variety of areas,” including political, cultural, economic and military.

    Russia has fuelled Israel’s war economy, purchasing more than $550 million of Israeli drones since Putin became president.[9] In 2010, Russia and Israel signed a five-year military contract that boosted “military ties between the two nations to help them fight common threats, such as terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.”[10] Increased cooperation and information sharing between Russian and Israeli intelligence services was one result of the agreement.
    In 2013, Putin’s Gazprom oil and Gas Company signed a 20-year deal with the Israeli firm Levant LNG Marketing Corp. to exclusively purchase liquefied natural gas from Israel’s Tamar offshore gas field.[11] Plans are also in the works for Russia to develop Israel’s Leviathan gas field. According to Debkafile, in August of 2015 Putin offered to heavily invest in, as well as safeguard, Israel’s gas fields, thereby dissuading hostile forces from confronting Israel.[12]Russia and Israel do billions in trade each year, and in 2013 negotiated a free trade agreement.[13]
    If Putin were truly “anti-Zionist” he would not have any relations with Israel whatsoever and would support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. Offering to safeguard Israel’s security with Russian investment in its economy is hardly a gesture of hostility. And signing a 20-year gas deal with Israel evidently signifies that Putin’s Russia believes the Jewish state will continue to exist 20 years in the future.
    Syria and Iran
    Russia’s support of Syria and Iran is a major talking point for those who wish to portray Putin as an ally in the struggle against Zionism. However, they ignore the driving factors behind said support and project motives onto Putin that aren’t there.
    Putin’s support of Syria and Iran, however mild and restricted that backing actually is, does not in any way prove that he is ideologically anti-Zionist. What it does illustrate is that he is a pragmatist who seeks stability in the region to secure markets for Russian big business. His position on Iran and Syria is not based on moral or ideological grounds, but practical ‘realpolitik’ motivated solely by self-interest.
    In a television interview with Russia Today, Putin condemned the Iranian government’s principled stance against Zionism, stating that “Iranian threats made towards [Israel] are absolutely unacceptable and counterproductive,” citing the falsely translated “wipe Israel off the map” quote attributed to Ahmadinejad. When challenged on the falsity of that quote, Putin retorted: “It doesn’t matter.”[18]
    So we can see Putin’s support for Iran begins and ends on the business front. Putin knows that the Iranian regime is not going anywhere absent a foreign invasion or engineered coup. And provided that Iran is a major client for Russian nuclear power technology and arms, Putin is inclined to have cordial relations with any government in Tehran, whether it is pro-Zionist (think the Shah) or anti-Zionist. Philosophically speaking, Putin is at odds with the Islamic Republic, and would probably favour an Iranian government less keen on ethical opposition to Zionism and Israeli imperialism. But business is business, and Putin doesn’t let the ideological leanings of his clientele get in the way of it most of the time.
    Ditto with Syria. Russia has a naval base on the Syrian coast and has many profitable military contracts with Damascus. Despite this, however, Russia sat on the sidelines for four years as Western/Israeli/Saudi-sponsored insurgents and terrorists have overrun Syria, destroying much of the country. Some portray Russia’s aggressive mediation that led to Syria’s compliance in surrendering its chemical weapons arsenal in 2013 as a victory for Syria insofar as it dissuaded the West from conducting airstrikes against Damascus which they were gearing up for at the time, using the WMD pretext to justify it.
    So the Russians have been double-dealing this whole time, posturing and manoeuvring against Assad behind the scenes, while publicly championing him. The Kremlin would not be that upset if Assad fell, so long as the regime to replace his is not hostile to Russia. Therefore, Russia’s support of Assad, insofar as we take the sincerity of it at face value, cannot be attributed to an ideological impetus, but rather economic, as with Iran and every other country that Moscow ostensibly “supports.”

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      Support The Pocketbook, and Communists are happy. Always.

      1. Patience2 Avatar

        The Oligarchs, actually. (Putins supporters)

  3. Maborlz Ez-Hari Avatar
    Maborlz Ez-Hari

    He looks like he’s about to growl an ass hole.

  4. 5thDrawer Avatar

    “In my opinion, provision of military support to illegal structures runs counter to…” our Ukraine buddies.

  5. Patience2 Avatar

    Once again, Putin shows just what a turd he is, Even though Assad has murdered well over five times the number of people his father had, Putin values Assads purchasing power more. Babushkas? Syrians?? What do they matter?

Leave a Reply