Israel’s Iron Dome

Share:

Israel Iron-Dome
BY SHELLY PALMER
The politics of the conflict between Hamas and the State of Israel are well documented, and I’m sure you have already formed an opinion about who is at fault and what must be done. This article is not about any of that. It’s not about right or wrong, good or bad, politics or religion … it’s about a remarkable technology that is serving both a strategic and tactical purpose in an untenable, unsustainable situation.

In Arthur C. Clarke’s famous essay, “Hazards of Prophecy: The Failure of Imagination” he offers a “law” of prediction that posits, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” If our imaginations don’t fail us, we can predict a defense system “so advanced” that enemy fire cannot penetrate it. Think of common arrows vs. suits of armor, or bombs vs. concrete-reinforced underground bunkers. That is the strategic idea behind Israel’s Iron Dome technology – protect Israel’s citizens and property by destroying enemy missiles in the air. Can Iron Dome technology really do that?

A Brief History

Developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and first deployed by the Israeli Air Force in March 2011, the Iron Dome is a truck-towed mobile air defense system that counters short-range rockets and artillery shell threats. Able to work in any weather condition (including fog, dust, clouds and rain), the Iron Dome protects Israel’s northern and southern borders against rockets aimed at the country’s populated areas. Right now, it’s able to counter threats from about 40 miles away, but Israel wants to bump that up to about 160 miles – and also make it possible to take down missiles coming from two directions at once.

The Iron Dome was developed in the mid-2000s, after nearly 4,000 rockets landed in North Israel during the country’s second war with Lebanon in 2006. More than 4,000 additional rockets fired from Gaza landed in southern Israel between 2000 and 2007. After first coming up with the idea of an air defense system in February 2007, the first version was successfully tested in March 2009. In July 2010, the United States provided $205 million to help expand the effectiveness of the Iron Dome.

How it Works

The Iron Dome is built around three basic elements: radar, a missile firing unit and a battle management/weapon control system. After initially detecting a rocket launch, the Iron Dome monitors the rocket’s path, analyzes the threat and calculates the point of impact. If the rocket is headed for a congested area, the Iron Dome then launches an interceptor to try to detonate the threat over a neutral area.

How the Iron Dome Works

The Iron Dome is made up of “batteries,” which are trucks featuring radar and three launchers. By the end of 2012, Israel had five batteries. In September 2013, the country added a sixth. There are currently eight batteries protecting the country, but weapons scientist Richard Lloyd recently pointed to this number as one of the system’s major flaws – there just aren’t enough batteries to protect all of Israel.

The Iron Dome’s Shortcomings

It’s also unclear just how effective the Iron Dome actually is. In December 2011, The Jerusalem Post said the Iron Dome was successful in downing rockets from Gaza 75 percent of the time. Later, the Jerusalem Post reported that the system had improved to become 90 percent effective.

But then, in November 2012, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) tweeted that it had stopped 302 of the 846 rockets fired from Gaza; this figure far lower than 50 percent, but still effective in keeping out hundreds of missiles. This month, however, the IDF said it had intercepted just 27 percent of the 180 rockets fired at Israel from July 7-9.

Then again, those numbers may not necessarily be accurate. Bloomberg reports that Lloyd and “a handful of other outside experts, including Theodore Postol of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, have been challenging the IDF’s assertions on Iron Dome’s success rate since at least 2012.” Even if the Iron Dome “intercepts” the missile, Lloyd says it may not manage to detonate its warhead in mid-air, meaning it’ll still cause major damage once it lands.

Other Forms of Missile Defense

While the Iron Dome has plenty of room for improvement, Israel has other systems in place to protect its citizens from rocket strikes. The country has a tremendous early-warning system to alert its citizens to incoming missile strikes, and it’s also constructed a network of shelters for its citizens to take cover in. These factors are major reasons why so few Israelis have died from missile strikes (at least, in comparison to the number of rockets Hamas has fired).

It’s this warning system and network of shelters that are saving most Israelis’ lives, according to Theodore Postol, a professor of science technology and national security policy at MIT. Postol estimates the Iron Dome’s success rate is less than 5 percent – far lower than just about every other estimate.

The Iron Dome’s true success rate probably lies somewhere between Postol’s 5 percent estimate and the IDF’s 90 percent figure – but at the time of this writing, statistics are fluid.

Technology, Strategy and Tactics

Today, Hamas is firing relatively unsophisticated short-range missiles at Israel. The strategy is to intercept them in the air. The tactics are to deploy eight mobile defensive Iron Dome batteries along the front and keep the enemy guessing as to their locations while neutralizing as many incoming missiles as possible. In practice, this will work until Hamas obtains more sophisticated weaponry.

One day, a more advanced version of Iron Dome technology may be capable of destroying every single incoming missile. While that day cannot come soon enough, it is sufficiently far enough in the future for us to need a quick, peaceful resolution. For everyone’s sake, I hope that peace finds a way.

SYS-CON

Share:

Comments

12 responses to “Israel’s Iron Dome”

  1. George Plankton Avatar
    George Plankton

    I know the MIT experts report but I don’t know the report of 27% out of 180 rockets though. I’ed be happy for an objective source. Also, presuming the facts are right, it is known that the ID intercepted some of 500 rockets. Simple math will get you to the conclusion that the sum of rockets hits on populated areas should be as high as 1300 hits. Also, we know that within each hit there are at least 10 ppl wounded. In that case there should be at least 13,000 ppl wounded in hospitals – and we know that it is far from being the truth.

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      If the ‘system’ determines the landing spot of the missile/rocket is rather inconsequential and decides ‘why worry about that one’, even as alarms are sounded, is that considered a ‘success’ and counted as such?
      In the ‘numbers game’ it is necessary to have all the numbers related to the actual success of ‘the programme’ and not simply the ones sent on a mission.
      If material and development cost-factors and man-hours are worked into it all, is there an actual ‘plus’ to anything in any programme related to the ‘warring games’? (noting that ‘computer-hours’ are related to ‘man-hours’ by another factor-skewed cost-factor related largely to ‘profit/loss’ games independently calculated in other programmes.)
      Body-count is only an ‘end result’ of programmes, which either fail to work or are wild successes depending on which side of the fence one sits, and only ONE death could still be a significant extrapolation-factor if it’s the ‘body-count’ number which is determining ‘success’ over a long haul.
      Number of wounded is another factor independent from a death (death being a finite number), which also has it’s own ‘success/fail’ adjustments to be made in the over-all factoring … i.e. what %age can function again after a ‘fix-up’ VS a need for lifetime maintenance – a significant cost factor in itself.
      All in all, determining ‘success’ may take another century of computer-hours to determine the correct relativity of the one piece of equipment to the ‘wholeness’ of one life which it can be factually stated to have saved, in the ‘numbers-games’ – dispassionately, of course.

      1. the count for successfull interceptions is the numbers of interceptions per launching.
        incase a rocket is fired to “open field” no Tamir interceptor is launched.

        numbers of wounded is very low cause :
        1. the interceptors are doing a hell of a job
        2. israeli civilians are trained in taking cover and there are safe rooms in almost everywhere

        combination of these to factors brings the casualties count to be as small as it is now

  2. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    For the ‘Science Buffs’ …. another disproportionately huge ‘Radio Signal’ has been received … this one from a spot in the Universe so far away that the planet Earth did not have oxygen in it’s atmosphere when it was sent.
    Attempting to ‘decode’ it will hopefully take less than the 3 Billion years it took to travel here … since it obviously has been made by an unknown energy source, which could prove useful when the oil runs out, or be used in ‘warring games’, perhaps.

    1. Patience2 Avatar
      Patience2

      Maybe ‘Iron Dome’ shot down one of their scout ships by accident??

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar
        5thDrawer

        I may never know … I have to wait for a computer …

    2. MekensehParty Avatar
      MekensehParty

      Another WOW signal?
      Where did you read this?

  3. Goose_Rider Avatar
    Goose_Rider

    Another over hyped piece of crap from the stables of Israel and USA

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      Anyone still riding a goose might be a little behind … :-))))

  4. Tidal wave changed shape of the moon http://lenta.ru/news/2014/07/31/moon/

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      action … reaction

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *