Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi presents himself at Mosque as caliph Ibrahim


Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi mosul mosque

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State, emerged from the shadows to lead Friday prayers at Mosul’s Great Mosque this week, the first time the notoriously secretive jihadi has made such a public appearance.

The head of the jihadist group chose the first Friday prayer service of Ramadan to make an audacious display of power in the city that the Sunni Islamists have now controlled for three weeks.

Speaking from the balcony of the mosque, al-Baghdadi urged the world’s Muslims to flock to the Islamic caliphate across Syria and Iraq declared by his organisation last week.

Under his direction, the Islamic world would be returned to “dignity, might, rights and leadership”, announced the self-anointed “Caliph Ibrahim”.

“I am the wali (leader) who presides over you, though I am not the best of you, so if you see that I am right, assist me,” he said, dressed in a black turban and robe.

“If you see that I am wrong, advise me and put me on the right track, and obey me as long as I obey God in you.”

Al-Baghdadi hailed the jihadi “victory” which he said had restored the caliphate after centuries.

“God gave your mujahedeen brothers victory after long years of jihad and patience… so they declared the caliphate and placed the caliph in charge,” he said.

“This is a duty on Muslims that has been lost for centuries.”

In the speech – which spread rapidly across jihadi websites with translations in multiple languages, al-Baghdadi also discussed practical matters pertaining to the caliphate. He called for doctors, judges, engineers and experts in Islamic jurisprudence to join the cause.

It was a bold move from a man who has turned his breakaway al-Qaeda faction, until recently known as Isis, into the world’s richest terrorist group but all the while carefully kept himself out of the public view.

There are only two known photographs of al-Baghdadi, one dating from his 2005-2009 imprisonment in a US detention camp in Iraq. On his release, to be handed over to Iraqi control, he reportedly remarked to US officials: “I’ll see you in New York”. And with that parting shot, he disappeared from sight – until now.

His appearance in Mosul came just as Iraqi officials claimed that he had been severely injured in a raid by government forces in Anbar province and had since fled to Syria. The decision to come out of hiding may have been aimed at disproving such claims, as well as at demonstrating the might of the Islamic State in the territories it has wrested from Baghdad’s control.

On Saturday, leading Sunni Muslim scholar Yusef al-Qaradawi denounced the Islamic State’s declaration of a caliphate, saying that it was in violation of sharia law.

Mr al-Qaradawi, a Qatar-based scholar who is regarded as a spiritual guide of the Muslim Brotherhood in his native Egypt, said in a statement that the declaration had “dangerous consequences” for Iraqi Sunnis and the conflict in Syria.

“We look forward to the coming, as soon as possible, of the caliphate,” he said, referring to the form of pan-Muslim government last seen under the Ottoman Empire.

“But the declaration issued by the Islamic State is void under sharia and has dangerous consequences for the Sunnis in Iraq and for the revolt in Syria,” he added.

He said the declaration, and the nomination of al-Baghdadi as caliph, by a group “known for its atrocities and radical views” fail to meet strict conditions dictated by sharia law.

The title of caliph, he said, can “only be given by the entire Muslim nation”, not by a single group.

Since last Sunday, other leading Muslim figures have queued up to denounce the declaration by the Islamic State, which was previously known as the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (Isis).

Al-Azhar, the most senior authority of Sunni Islam, “believes that all those who are today speaking of an Islamic State are terrorists,” a representative, Sheikh Abbas Shuman, told AFP earlier this week.

“The Islamic caliphate can’t be restored by force. Occupying a country and killing half of its population… this is not an Islamic state, this is terrorism,” he said.

Rebels in Syria, who have turned on the jihadists that hijacked the uprising against Bashar al-Assad and appalled many by their brutality, have branded the caliphate announcement as “null and void”.

Jordanian Al-Qaeda cleric Issam Barqawi, known as Abu Mohammed al-Maqdessi, also denounced it, warning it will only lead to more violence.

The Telegraph



96 responses to “Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi presents himself at Mosque as caliph Ibrahim”

  1. nagy_michael2 Avatar

    Lol he looks like the priest in my hometown. This guy is Bashar no#1 friend and where is Bashar planes when this was given sermon and asking people to obey him at the mosque for hours. where are the Iranians shooting him down. The Caliph is Iran and Hezbollah biggest friend and they love what he is doing in Iraq and Syria. he is killing muslims sunnis more than shiites and also eliminating Assad enemies in Syria. Now what more Bashar can ask.. really..

    1. TheUSequalsTheIS Avatar

      is this what they tell u in the ghetto?

  2. 5thDrawer Avatar

    Amazing they didn’t destroy that Mosque … I guess he needed a platform for his more Supreme Supremo-ness to flow from. Nice to see Al-Azhar is still thinking, while al-Qaradawi who still wants a Caliphate thinks this could be a poor choice since it wasn’t done Democratically.
    What a pack of nuts.

    1. MekensehParty Avatar

      Qardawi is pissed because he wants to be Caliph instead of the Caliph
      but “he’s no good”

    2. wargame1 Avatar

      Islamic Khalifa was there in the past. In Arabic the word “Khalifa” means successor or ruler who govern the country. There were series of Khaliph in the past and four of the early Khalifs were rightly guided. There were many bad Khalifa too such as Khalifa Mamun in Iraq during the Abbasid Khelafa. Mamun made the “Mutazilites” as state religion. Mutazilites are the Shias Sufis who reject the concept of Al-Kadr i.e. pre-destination. After the first four rightly guided Khalifa the subsequent Khalifas have good and bad in them. Every country has rulers i.e. Khalifa . Some of them can be called King , President , Prime minister , Sultan etc. So when the Muslims use the word Khalifa then it simply means ruler. Some may follow the Islamic guidance others may follow their own way in the name of Islam.

      There is another way to explain the meaning of Khelafa when it comes to world governance. The Almighty God will appoint the Khalifa in world governance too. He gives this power to whom ever he wishes. In the past the Aad and Samud nation (Mentioned in the Quran) were given the Khelafa (Inheritance or absolute power over all people) but when they became tyrant they were punished and destroyed. In the past the Israelites were given the Khelafa too. Khelafa will be given to many nations in the past and it will continue. Currently the world Khalifa is certainty USA but as they are becoming tyrant and unable to govern the world. Thus their Khelafa will be revoked and another nation will replace them. The Umayeds Khelafa were the biggest in the past.

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        So Wargame …, what you’re saying is that the basic ‘instinctive’ laziness and stupidity of humans (what they are born with) just keeps going around and around unless they are taught otherwise. I agree on that.
        They eventually end up picking one dolt who is going to be the absolute WORST to lead them in any way, shape, or form. 🙂
        Perhaps it’s why ‘Solomon’s’ Kingdom vanished … they couldn’t find anyone like him to replace him with, so they closed the mines and walked away. :-))))

        1. wargame1 Avatar

          I didnt say any of the thing you attribute on me

          1. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Well … in a sense, you did. However ….
            If you also say that ‘the concept of Al-Kadr i.e. pre-destination’ … I would think ‘Al-Kadrists’ could get along with the Dali Llama better than anyone in the world. Maybe we should all listen to Him who is ‘pre-destined’. ??

      2. Btru2u Avatar

        caliph is the ruler and khilafah is the state. I have not heard of a non muslim khilafah.

        1. wargame1 Avatar

          Khelafa means inheritance on earth who are given absolute power. They can be a muslim nation or a non Muslim nation. Khalifa means successor who rules. He also can be a muslim or a non Muslim. The term “Khalifa upon the way of the prophethoos” are the rightly guided Khalifa and they are Muslims. Adam( Peace be upon him) was a Khalifa appointed by Allah. The Aad and Thamud nation (Non Muslim Khelafa) were given the Khelafa but they disobeyed the command of Allah thus they were destroyed. Khalifa is a Arabic word and it means a Ruler. A king is a Khalifa a President is a Khalifa , A sultan is a Khalifa. Now you dont find the word “President” in Arabic because its a English word. Khalifa is a word with meaning. The meaning is “Ruler”

          USA is a non Muslim Khelafa as you can see they are given the absolute power on Earth. We have such powerful nations in the past. As soon as you understand the meaning of Khelafa then you will realize how those power hungry Khawarij mis use this word Khelafa to fool the people. They will never have the Khelfa nor Bagdadi is the prophesised Khalif of the Muslims. They can do their ruling as long as Allah want them before their destruction. I have read prophesy that Banul Abas will have a perishing end who are carrying the Black flag from Iraq

    3. wargame1 Avatar

      “And remember how He made you inheritors after the ‘Ad people and gave you habitations in the land: ye build for yourselves palaces and castles in (open) plains, and carve out homes in the mountains; so bring to remembrance the benefits (ye have received) from Allah, and refrain from evil and mischief on the earth.” (Quran 7:74)

      The above verse is about the Thamud Nation who were given the Khelafa when the previous Khelafa of Ad were destroyed due to their transgression. And then the Thamud Nation were also destroyed for the same reason. Now the word “Khelafa” means Inheritance of the Earth or absolute power etc. When a Khalif rule within a boundary of a country then his power is limited to that country but the same Khalifa can also rule the world if he is given that power. This is not a easy or straightforward thing as we see how Russia China North Korea Iran India etc are competing of that absolute power. USA and its allies of Europe are undoubtedly the current Khalifa of the world. Al-Qaeda monopolized the word “Khelafa” in such a way that it is supposedly a sacred thing and they were supposedly given the absolute right to establish it. The reason of their emphasis on the word Sharia Khelafa is to fool the people. There are many prophesy about the advent of a “rightly guided Khalifa” in the end of time. So it is normal that many party who have political aspiration will use the word Sharia Khalifa and the Black Flag to manipulate the masses.

  3. MekensehParty Avatar

    The newest addition to the cartoon like characters leading the Muslim world

  4. Fauzia45 Avatar

    What folly?I do not think that anyone in his right mind would want to live under this ^rule^!!They are death and destruction !!They are cruel and bloody !They are blind fanatics that are full of hate for the present and what exists now!

  5. Btru2u Avatar

    Even though there are sincere Muslims fighting oppression with Isis. I believe that the ISIS leadership is a product of the CIA to further divide the region and hijack the revolution , preying on the vulnerable minds of sincere jihadists. Here some of the reasons for this belief .
    1: JUBHAT AL NUSRA, , fought and beat Assads troops in Syria, then ISIS moved in declaring victory and demanding allegiance from NUSRA. 
    2: ISIS has shed the blood of the Muslim rebels including NUSRA , to forcibly impose their will on them, but ISIS not yet taken on not yet fought Assads troops.
    3. There is something fishy when you see 30000 fully armed Maliki troops flee and leave their weapons for 1000 ISIS troops.
    4: How can a khilafah state be declared when , no capital cities have been taken and secured for the the caliph and it’s people to move around freely and with security.
    5: He does not have the full support the majority of the people , and cannot move around safely .
    6: He declare that ISIS and NUSRA are united when no such agreement was made, and he has not even contacted or spoken to anyone.
    7: The caliphate was not established in the way of the prophet.

    1. master09 Avatar

      Why don’t we stop this bullshit that everyone is an agent or the works of someone else and just say these wankers are from hell.

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Always seem to manage to get the CIA into it somehow, don’t they?
        Naughty America again.
        I cannot recall ANY time that the original Syrian people, wanting more say in running their country, OR the FSA, EVER said they ‘wanted’ a ‘Caliphate’ again. Wasn’t the idea to have some democratic freedom and less fear from despots?
        Not that Btru2u wants that exactly … either … 😉

        1. master09 Avatar

          These clowns sit on a lounge watch Hollywood crap and see that CIA crap and really think that’s how simple things are. Action scene 200 ok car bomb. Lol Jews America and the Christians are to blame for world problems.

          1. wargame1 Avatar

            Who are to blame for Iraq Afghanistan Libya invasion?

          2. master09 Avatar

            The CIA yes your rite good work you uncovered the facts. Clap, clap clap. Lets all sleep well now that you gave us the facts. Lol

          3. master09 Avatar

            That’s how it has been in all of living time the most powerful do what they want. Who would you rather China. Lol

          4. 5thDrawer Avatar

            5 Billion of them and already moved everywhere you can think of. :-)))

          5. MekensehParty Avatar

            You are!

        2. barabie Avatar

          Another Murderous Milestone: 60 Years of Carnage
          Chris Floyd

          But the CIA raids that culminated in the bombing of the Springfjord unnerved the Guatemalan army command, who withdrew their support from Arbenz. By the evening of 27 June he’d resigned.
          Our 21st century intervention in Iraq has killed far more people much more quickly, of course. But as we gear up for yet another round of slaughter in the country we have recently demolished, it’s good to be reminded that none of this is new or unusual; it is, very simply — and quite horribly — the way the bipartisan American elite do business. Violence is their profession, their religion, their guiding light. They use violence to advance their agenda, then use more violence to deal with the inevitable horrific consequences spawned by their violence, on and on in an endless cycle.


          1. 5thDrawer Avatar

            We know them. Which is why Canadians are always wary of ‘them’ … although the ‘anti-socialist’ rhetoric often flows across the border and is emulated by some on this side for sure.
            Because of people, like Stalin, who took socialism to a ‘new level’ beyond the ‘social’ concepts, in the American Mind (like a religion) it became equated with Communism. And while ‘Power of A Few’ under Communism wasn’t enjoyed, virtually the Same thing in America flies with the right propaganda, AND the FACT that ‘the people’ actually DO have a chance to rise above a poverty-line AND have the freedom to read those bits of history … when they come out … and actually COULD effect a difference IF they all hit the polls like Iraquis tried to do. Dumbing-down education helps a lot, of course. 😉
            AND Until recently, of course, Americans (and others) could also get on a plane and fly for a vacation without ANY hassles.
            We know what ‘thinking’ screwed that idea.
            I believe they can still drive across their country without a permit. 😉

          2. MekensehParty Avatar

            Stay wary my friend, just like you were wary of the king’s anger 250 years ago.
            btw, are you guys still “subjects” of the queen, or did socialism free you to become subjects of your government?
            As docile subjects you Canucks can align with any verb, and we know which country is the land of the verb, it’s where the new rhetoric is coming from…
            Love your apples :-))))

          3. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Apple a day keeps the Doctor away. 🙂 But we also know where Johnny Appleseed began spreading the good medicine.
            And yes, we ‘changed’ the role of Monarchy in the politics .. those ARE ours … but we LOVE the symbolism from the country which invented parliaments and free speech, and began all that by telling the Monarch to sit quietly to perform the duties OF the state.
            Republicanism always seems a little daft to me. But the USA and France seem to love it. Oh well. Love your Presidents.:-))

      2. wargame1 Avatar

        Meaningful discussion is beneficial to everyone but when you write some cheap word to make your comment with some impact then it becomes annoying. Bullshit ,wanker from hell etc doesnt make any sense. I just read two comments of Nagymichael and Btruetu and both of them are good to read. You can make your counter argument with some evidence or rhetoric which can help others to think rationally.

        1. master09 Avatar

          It’s all bullshit crap that is toooo the point all that u guys rite is conspiracy theory bullshit that makes no sense at all. Tha facts is these clowns do not believe in life but death to those who do not follow them. Is that a meaningful discussion for you or should I put on the coffee or ice the scotch. Feh. Where do you get your facts from google or the cousin who knows a cousin who heard a man talking in a cafe about this other Man U call that facts. No one knows the real facts NO ONE.

      3. MekensehParty Avatar

        Please, some respect for hell, we might have Satanist in the community

    2. wargame1 Avatar

      Hezbut tahrir, ISIL, Muslim Brotherhood, Al-Qaeda, Islamic Jihad, Al Muhajirun, Boko Haram etc are the movement of the Khawarij. Their call of Sharia Khelafa is pure innovation. They are the key to the foreign invasion of Iraq Afghanistan. Their taking responsibility of 911 and London 7/7 attack gave the perfect pretext to the occupation force. They indeed work for Israel and Iran. The Khawarij are the Dogs of the hell fire. There could be some naive Muslims fighting for them. Its their freedom.

      1. Btru2u Avatar

        Thanks for your opinion. Khilafah state is obligotary in accordance to quran and sunnah.
        Which do you think is worse, segregation based on belief or a line on the sand?
        If the Islamic State has pure intentions, Allah (swt) will give them this life and the Akhira, we can only be patient and see. Don’t let the propaganda settle, don’t let a box in your living room define what is right and wrong, in this month of Ramazan, pray that the Islamic State benefits the Ummah.

        1. wargame1 Avatar

          There is no such obligation in Islam in forming a Khalifa state. The obligation for a Muslim is to Pray five times a day, Pay Zakat, Pilgrime and fasting. Muslims can do it any where on earth. Now show me the proof where Allah and his messenger ask the Muslims to establish Islamic state.

        2. wargame1 Avatar

          You are falling for the propaganda because NEVER the prophet and his companion ever talk about the forming a Islamic State. This concept of forming a Islamic State is coming from the Khawarij the Dogs of the Hell fire. NOW I want you to clarify precisely about your claim i.e. ” Khilafah state is obligotary in accordance to quran and sunnah”
          You need to bring proof from the Quran and hadis and NOT from those cult reference like Hezbuttahrir, Sayeed Qutb, Taqiuddin Nabahani etc. Bring it on from the Quran and from the hadis.

          1. Btru2u Avatar

            The Arabic word “ummah” as it is used in these verses means: “people united by faith”. This particular meaning for the word “ummah” is often see in the Qur’ân. For instance, Allah says: “Humanity was a single ummah and Allah sent Messengers with glad tidings and warnings…” [Sûrah al-Baqarah: 213]

            “This ummah of yours is a single ummah, and I am your Lord, so worship me.” [Sûrah al-Anbiyâ’: 92]

          2. wargame1 Avatar

            OK fine , so where do you get the obligation to form a Islamic State? By proclaiming a Islamic State like a dictator only divide the ummah.

          3. Maborlz Ez-Hari Avatar
            Maborlz Ez-Hari

            You guys still competing for accolades about who is smarter? Let me tell the both of you to get a move on, life is short be smart and make friends not enemies.

          4. wargame1 Avatar

            Mind your business and dont poke your filthy nose in a topic where you have no interest.

          5. Maborlz Ez-Hari Avatar
            Maborlz Ez-Hari

            The topic is on a public domain, I’m interested in your culture, I don’t share your beliefs, however I am amused. Please, allow me to donate my 2cents maybe you can wipe my nose while your at it.

          6. wargame1 Avatar

            Ask your mama and she will do it for free including your ass wipe

          7. Btru2u Avatar

            Indeed, Allah loves those who fight in His cause in a row as though they are a [single] structure joined firmly.
            (Meaning a united force)

          8. wargame1 Avatar

            So where do you find Islamic State?

          9. wargame1 Avatar

            It is prescribed to fight against the oppression and we saw the FSA was doing and then this Khawarij came in and start calling for a Islamic state. I want you to show proof that our prophet ever ask his umma to form a Islamic State

          10. wargame1 Avatar

            Ok Joined family sounds good. But ISIL from the beginning were creating discord among the rebel and now they just call for Khelafa like a dictator. Where are the other candidates of the Khalifa ?

          11. Btru2u Avatar

            Like I said I am sceptical, but cautiously optimistic, before I condemn a powerful muslim. Like I said I pray that there will benefit for the Umma from him.
            His khutbah was impressive ,flawless and appropriate, as was his statements.
            If a khilafah seizes power by force we should still follow him, as it better than the fitnah of many rivals.
            Muslims are attracted to success in battles which he is achieving, but he needs to make a lot more massive territorial gains, and has to answer some questions.
            Pakistan is an important player in our unity, and if generals the biggest Muslims armies can pull off a coup and unite, this will send shock waves throughout the world, and then they will know we mean business.

          12. wargame1 Avatar

            Khalifa means successor King president Prime minister Sultan etc. Overall he is a ruler. Alah gave Khefa to Aad and Thamud nations too. So the word Khelafa is not a sacred thing. BUT Khalifa upon the way of the prophethood is the one who are rightly guided i.e. The first four Khalifa and in the end of time Al-Mahdi. All in between had both good and bad in them but NONE of them were “Rightly guided Khalifa”

          13. wargame1 Avatar

            You gave a opinion that “If a khilafah seizes power by force we should still follow him, as it better than the fitnah of many rivals.”

            This applies to all the rulers in every country. But the Al-Qaeda/Khawarij doctrine wants to overthrow all the rulers as they think they are Kafir!! So in conclusion The Al-Qaeda believes IF their version of Khalifa seizes power then every one should follow that Khalifa!! Well it is far from the reality. A Khalifa will be chosen by the majority and a true Khalifa is not hungry for power. I will bring all the hadis regarding the “Khalifa upon the way of the Prophethood” after few hours or tomorrow.

          14. Btru2u Avatar

            very good then sounds logical.

          15. wargame1 Avatar

            Dont forget that you need to bring evidence from the Quran and from the hadis that it is supposedly obligatory to establish Islamic State. I would like to know from where you get your inspiration. So far what you are saying resembling the ideology of Sayeed Qutb Taqiuddin Nabahani Hezbuttahrir and Al-Qaeda. But these groups are from the sufis and they dont have much approval in the sunnis community.

          16. Btru2u Avatar

            It is in Hadith – Narrated by Imam Ahmed (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) in his Musnad, from Al-Nu’man Ibn Bashir (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) , who said: “We were sitting in Masjid-e-Nabawi (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم), and Bashir was a man who did not speak much, so Abu Tha’labah Al-Khashnee (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) came and said: ‘Oh, Bashir bin Sa’ad (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ), have you memorized the words of the Messenger of Allah (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) regarding the Rulers?’ Huthayfah (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) replied, ‘I have memorized his words’. So Abu Tha’labah ( رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) sat down and Huthayfah (رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ) said:
            قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: تكون النبوة فيكم ما شاء الله أن تكون، ثم يرفعها الله إذا شاء أن يرفعها، ثم تكون خلافة على منهاج النبوة فتكون ما شاء الله أن تكون، ثم يرفعها الله إذا شاء أن يرفعها، ثم تكون ملكًا عاضًا فيكون ما شاء الله أن يكون، ثم يرفعها إذا شاء الله أن يرفعها، ثم تكون ملكًا جبرية فتكون ما شاء الله أن تكون، ثم يرفعها الله إذا شاء أن يرفعها، ثم تكون خلافة على منهاج النبوة، ثم سكت

            Meaning –

            “The Messenger of Allah (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) said: Prophet-hood will be amongst you as long as Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی) wishes, then He will lift it up when He wishes to lift it up.

            Then there will be Caliphate (خلافة) on the way of the Prophet-hood (Khilafat-e-Rashidah) and it will be as long as Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی) wishes, then Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی) will lift it up when He wishes to lift it up.

            Then there will be Inheritance Rule (Kings Rule) (ملكًا عاضًا), and it will last as long as Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی) wishes, then Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی) will lift it up when He wishes to lift it up.

            Then there will be Coercive Rule (Dictatorships) (ملكًا جبرية), and it will last as long as Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی) wishes, then Allah (سبحانہ و تعا لی) will lift it up when He wishes to lift it up.

            Then there will be Caliphate on the way of Prophet-hood ( خلافة على منهاج النبوة صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم). Then he (Prophet – صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم ) was silent.” (Ahmed – Hadith # 18430).
            Salafis cannot deny the above Hadith as their trusted scholar Al-Bani has described it as Sahih.

          17. wargame1 Avatar

            No one denying the above hadis except the Al-Qaeda Khawarij. Khelafa upon the way of the prophethood will be under a man who is a descendant of the prophet through the line of Al-Hasan. There are many hadis connected to this matter and many signs also. One of the signs is the current self proclaimed Khalifa of Iraq and they are from Banul Abbas. Allah will destroy them on due time. Allah appoints the Leader which is a guided one i.e. Al Mahdi he will revive the sunnah of the prophet. But no hadis ever mentioned that he will form a Islamic State. Now I will talk about that guided leader and his advent from the hadis. This Bagdadi is not him nor his Al-Qaeda/Khawarij/ISIS is that party. Those beheaders of Muslims are the Dogs of the hell fire.

          18. wargame1 Avatar

            I asked you to bring proof from the hadis and from the Quran the Obligation of forming a Islamic State. So kindly do not beat around the bush and get to the point.

    3. sweetvirgo Avatar

      Your mind can only be vulnerable if you allow it to be.

      1. Btru2u Avatar

        That’s funny coming from someone who believes everything that is reported by mainstream media.

        1. sweetvirgo Avatar

          How do you know that?? I gave you my opinion about the “vulnerable mind” and you come up with that?? I see you are not equipped with opinions that dont’ reflect yours. It’s your personal problem. Hopefully you can over come it.

          1. Btru2u Avatar

            I read your history

  6. Btru2u Avatar

    A righteous caliph is not a hard man but a lenient man .
    Why are not the original revolutionary rebel groups , working with the new so called caliphate . Because he will kill anyone that does not agree with him.
    CIA is allowing him to be the so called Sunni leader so as to divide the region once more .
    Muslims have been fooled , just as Gamel Addel Nasser fooled the Muslims with his moving speeches , only to betray the umma with his authoritarianism , human rights violations and leave Egypt to future dictatorial governance without even establishing any civil institutions.
    HIZB AT TAHRIR predicted that once the west sees the threat of an United Islamic khilafah state being established , they will beat them to it and fund the establishment of their own puppet caliphate first.
    All the puppet rulers in the region seem to be content with this outcome.
    So everyone can have their own piece of the pie.
    THE WEST PLANS BUT ALLAH (swt) is the best of planners.

    1. wargame1 Avatar

      Hezbut tahrir are the party of Khawarij. It doesnt matter what they say. Taqiuddin Al Nabahani who was their boss was a sufi and he was also a baath party member. This whole movement is pro Iranian. The current “Khalifa” of Iraq is also supported by Hezbuttahrir. There is no concept of a united Islamic state of Khelafa EVER prescribed by the prophet or his companions. This is pure innovation by the Khawarij and this movement endangered the ordinary sunni people all over the world. Their head group Muslimbrotherhood are also a pro Iranian group infiltrated among the sunni youth. Sayeed Qutb Aiman Zawaheri Bin Laden etc are the followers of the Khawarij
      Here is a youtube video for you about this group


    2. wargame1 Avatar

      The current Iraqi Khalif and his party represent the Abbasid Khelafa. They havent identified themselves officially because during Abbadis Khelafa in the past the Muslims experienced all kind of innovation. According to prophesy Banul Abbas will emerge from Iraq with Black Flag who will create Fitnah (Tribulation) in Syria Iraq etc. Allah will destroy them in the end. From all the hadis it is clear that the ISIL is infact Banul Abbas but I didnt have any contemporary proof. But I have found from a Audio tape of that Anwer Al Awlaki (A khawarij or a follower of the Khawarij) . Here is the youtube Audio/Video link where you will learn about ISIL from one of their own

    3. man-o-war Avatar



  7. Bootylicious Avatar

    Stop with conspiracy theories, this is a sign of the end of times, soon there will be more bloodshed, and no one can do anything about it

  8. wargame1 Avatar

    “Say: “O Allah. Lord of Power (And Rule), Thou givest power to whom Thou pleasest, and Thou strippest off power from whom Thou pleasest: Thou enduest with honour whom Thou pleasest, and Thou bringest low whom Thou pleasest: In Thy hand is all good. Verily, over all things Thou hast power.

    “Thou causest the night to gain on the day, and thou causest the day to gain on the night; Thou bringest the Living out of the dead, and Thou bringest the dead out of the Living; and Thou givest sustenance to whom Thou pleasest, without measure.” (Quran 3:26-27)

    It is not befitting in Islam to have political aspiration to rule over others. It is necessary to have a ruler in a country and it is necessary to have an authority who will rule over the world but when he covets for it and fights for it then its wrong. A genuine and rightly guided ruler will never wish to be in that place until people oblige him to be there. A self proclaimed Khalifa with few acceptance from people will never be a good Khalifa. Dictators like Assad Nuri Al Maliki Gaddafi etc are the example of this who constantly need to repress their people in to submission in order to remain in power. Bagdadi is no different.

  9. wargame1 Avatar

    “Allah has promised, to those among you who believe and work righteous deeds, that He will, of a surety, grant them in the land, inheritance (of power), as He granted it to those before them; that He will establish in authority their religion – the one which He has chosen for them; and that He will change (their state), after the fear in which they (lived), to one of security and peace: ‘They will worship Me (alone) and not associate aught with Me. ‘If any do reject Faith after this, they are rebellious and wicked.” (Quran 24:55)

    Islam teaches people to be righteous and the religious practice was prescribed in a simple way that people can practice it all over the world with or without a Muslim Khalif. There are millions of practicing Muslims around the world who have no problem in practicing their religion under Khalifa of different faith. To have a Islamic Khalifa is NOT a prerequisite for a Muslim to remain as Muslims. So those Al-Qaeda Khawarij are fooling the people because they covet money and power and their best strategy is to call for a Islamic Khelafa where people become non-plused and benumbed to challenge their wrong doing and their ulterior motive. Al-Qaeda tries to make people belief as they are supposedly the chosen people of God for a divine mission. Unfortunately this concept of establishing Khelafa doesnt exist in Islam. Its a pure innovation by the Khawarij. Here is a Youtube video sample of those group

  10. xx`^` Avatar

    Is it a coincidence that ISIS suddenly emerged in Syria, at a time when the collapse of Assad’s regime seemed definite? The emergence of ISIS saved the Syrian regime by threatening the world with an alternative terrorist regime that would replace Assad’s and by fighting against the armed opposition.
    The same scenario happened in Iraq. Nouri al-Maliki, who is the closest to Iran, was on the verge of ending his term as prime minister, especially that Sunni, Shiite and Kurds leaders unanimously refused to renew his term. Suddenly again, ISIS emerged. It seized Mosul, the second largest and most heavily guarded city. And so, Maliki was brought back to the forefront, imposing himself as the needed leader to face the Sunni terrorists.
    Instead of ISIS fighting its obvious opponents, Assad and al-Maliki, the group mobilized its men towards the northern borders of Saudi Arabia with Iraq. It has also waged a battle on the southern borders between Saudi Arabia and Yemen.
    Iran was the enemy in their religious propaganda, and was secretly their ally. It was home for some al-Qaeda cells since the nineties, led by Egyptian fundamentalist Saif al-Adel. After al-Qaeda’s escape from Afghanistan, Iran has become a refuge for many more cells. Bin Laden sent half of his children and one of his wives to Iran, and after his death, they were handed over to Syria and then to Saudi Arabia. There are still a huge number of al-Qaeda’s Saudi and Arab leaders and soldiers in Iran. Al-Qaeda has never targeted Iran, despite its ideology and incitement against Shiites!

    It seems these zionist heretic kuffar (bad) shiites (not all of them) are oblivious to the fact and have become so arrogant and DUMB due to their historical success in deceptions, deceits, false flags, treacheries, etc. that they honestly believe they can play this game forever and fool the naive, weak, and helpless ones!

  11. xx`^` Avatar

    Open and Hidden goals of Hizbusatan:
    The openly-declared goals of the Hizbusatan in Lebanon are that it is an organization opposed ot the Israeli occupation of Lebanon and that it wishes to liberate the sanctified place of Palestine (Bayt al-Maqdis), but this is simply a means of deceiving the Muslims, to blind them and divert them (the Muslims) away from their (the Shia’s) real goals, and to make them (the Muslims) inclined towards them, and this they achieve through a policy of serving social and human needs in the society with support from Iran.

    As for the true and real hidden goals they are to spread Shi’ism in Lebanon, to maintain a permanent Shia presence and to take control over all elements of strength in the country (political, social, military, economical). And this is part of an overall agenda to prepare the region for the advancement of Iran and its religous and political objectives.

  12. xx`^` Avatar

    The Amazing and Heroic Hizbusatan:
    In 1985 the Harakah Amal al-Shi’iyyah’s forces besieged the Palestinian refugee camps in South Lebanon (and were aided by some Christian factions). This was supported by the Nusayri Baatinee leader of Syria, al-Assad, who did not want the presence of Palestinians in the south to invite any major invasion from Israel and also because he wanted the area to be dominated by the Shia. The battles became known as “the war of the camps” and the Shia committed great atrocities against the Palestinians in the camps. They killed old men, women and children in refugee camps, they also killed some Palestinians in the hospitals of Beirut, slitting their throats (reported in the Sunday Telegraph 27/5/1985), and their militias gathered tens of wounded into the camps and killed them, and witnesses also reported that they saw the militias of Harakah Amal kill more than forty-five wounded in the Gaza Hospital and its surrounding areas. These militia, after taking over the refugee camp of Sabra, went into the streets of Western Beirut on 2/6/1985 chanting, “Laa ilaaha illallaah, al-‘Arab a’daa Allaah” (…the Arabs are the enemies of Allaah…). And Kuwaiti News (4/6/1985) and al-Watan (3/6/1985) both reported that the Militia of Harakah Amal kidnapped twenty-five Palestinian girls from around the camps of Sabra.
    And Subhee al-Tufaylee in his meeeting with al-Sharq al-Awsat newspaper (25th September 2003 / 29th Rajab 1424H) said that when the Israeli army entered Lebanon and destroyed the Palestinian factions (in the South) with participation of the Shia, the Shia of South Lebanon stood to receive the Zionist Israeli troops, and this is confirmed by Hasan Nasr Allaah as documented in the book Sajal al-Noor (p. 227) issued by Hizbollah itself.
    All of the above indicates that the Harakah Amal al-Shi’iyyah major objective was to get rid of Palestinian Sunni presence in the region, and there was understanding and co-operation between the Jews and the Shia from years prior.

    1. wargame1 Avatar

      the shias are the Donkeys of the jews- the jews ride on them in every fitna(fake islamic revolution) Youtube video link bellow

      1. Anti ISIS Avatar
        Anti ISIS

        And the Sunni’s are the Shiites donkeys. Actually, the Sunni’s are pretty much everybody’s donkeys. Just look at all the Sunni leaders around the world and who they bow down to.

        1. wargame1 Avatar

          You should get out of the sunni majority country and then lecture. The sunnis drive you any way sooner or later due to your treachery

      2. xx`^` Avatar

        What are Alavis called then? When checked last time they were called infidels and ladeen by their very own masters the great infallible shias.

    2. 5thDrawer Avatar

      Nice rescourcing …

  13. GrapeLeaves Avatar

    Well, now that his photo is public, Obama will likely be sending a drone over for a “visit.”

    And really, announcement at a “prayer service.” How about praying for peace and STFU about a caliphate that will never exist.

  14. xx`^` Avatar

    The Infallible Hizbusatan:
    Hizbusatan is probably the world’s largest, most sophisticated, wealthiest and most militarily capable terror organization. Created, trained, funded and deployed as a proxy of the Iranian government, with operations spanning Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Americas, the Shi’ite group has effectively taken over the Lebanese government and the beautiful Lebanon.

    No way, they are so infallible that they can be into organ trading of helpless Syrian Sunni refugee’s, drug trafficking, money laundering, arms smuggling, prostitution, extortion, sectarian blood sheds, playing victim games, invoking the so called takfiri boogie man/men when its convenient and when their true evil designs are to be uncovered, false terror attacks, terrorist acts, or holding beautiful Lebanon and Lebanese hostage to further their evil agendas!

  15. xx`^` Avatar

    Why Hizbusatan, Assad, Maliki, Khamenei, and other evil Zionists are not attacking or will not attack IS?
    Iran and Hezbollah view the Syrian civil war not only in a strategic context, but in a prophetic one. In their belief, the radical Sunnis will conquer Syria for a short period of time and then Iranian forces will intervene on their way to destroying Israel.
    The unnamed reporter points out that Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah is, like Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, “known for being a strong believer” in the Shiite prophecy that Iran will lead an End Times war against Islam’s enemies. At that time, the Mahdi (Dajjal) will “reappear” and defeat the infidel.
    Iran and Hezbollah rely upon a book of prophecies called Al-Jafr to guide them. It was passed down to Jafar al-Sadiq, for whom the Jafari school of Shiite jurisprudence is named after. Teachers of this book say that the Syrian leader (Assad?) will be killed in a civil war during the End Times.
    A Sunni leader (from IS?) will take over Syria and persecute Shiites, Allawites and Christians. The persecution will continue until an Iranian army invades Syria via Iraq, killing this Sunni leader on the way to capturing Jerusalem. Once Jerusalem is taken, the Mahdi will appear. Interestingly, in a modern context, this means that Hezbollah is fighting to preserve the regime of a man (Bashar Assad) that they believe will be killed.
    In July 2010, a senior Iranian clericsaid that Khamenei told his inner circle that he had met with the Mahdi (Dajjal), who promised to “reappear” during his lifetime.
    A very similar eschatological viewpoint is articulated in a 2011 documentary produced by the office of then-President Ahmadinejad. The film, titled “The Coming is Upon Us.”
    The arrival of Jews in Palestine from the West and the birth of the state of Israel, the conquering of Arabia by the Al-Sauds and the global dominance of the U.S. and the West are all clearly foretold, it claims.
    An Allah-blessed revolution will take place in Iran led by a man based out of Qom. The narrators point to the 1979 Islamic Revolution as a clear fulfillment. After this happens, a series of vague and specific “signs” are to follow.
    The most specific “signs” are related to Iraq. The Iranian video claims that prophecy requires the invasion of Iraq by infidels from the south with heavy use of aircraft, as happened in 2003. The infidel will cause tribal divisions and the evil dictator of Iraq (Saddam), will be killed.
    After Assad is killed and replaced by a vicious Sunni leader (from IS?), Iranian forces are to invade Syria from Iraq. The withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq and the Iraqi government’s slide into the Iranian orbit are undoubtedly seen as dramatic “signs.”
    Other signs include the Westernization of Muslim youth (with the 2009 Green Revolution offered as evidence), the Iran-backed Houthi rebellion in Yemen and the overthrow of Egyptian President Mubarak.
    Iran and Hezbollah are first focused on assembling an anti-Western Arab coalition. The Coming is Upon Us film specifically cites the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood as a step towards this, even if Iran and the Brotherhood are on opposite sides in Syria.
    This stage includes fomenting internal strife in Bahrain, a Shiite-majority country governed by a pro-American Sunni monarchy. A representative of Khamenei said in 2011 that Bahrain presents “the best opportunity to begin setting the stage for the emergence of the 12th imam, our Mahdi.”
    The development that Iran is eagerly awaiting is the death of the Saudi King Abdullah, which will trigger internal strife throughout Saudi Arabia. It is probable that this is when Iran hopes to begin a rebellion in the Shiite-majority Eastern Province where 90% of the country’s oil is.
    Once an Arab coalition is formed and Syria is invaded, Jerusalem is to be captured by the Iranian-led forces. At this point, the Mahdi (Dajjal) is to reappear and final victory will come that includes a Nasrallah-led march to Mecca.

    Analysis of these prophecies helps us see the future through the eyes of the evil heretic kuffar majoos zionist Hezbollah and the Iranian regime. You also will be able to see the real TRUTH behind what is being downplayed, projected, and propagandize in the social media to demonize naive, weak, and helpless Sunnis, who (NWO puppets – zionist, neocons, west, nato, big satan, etc.) is with them, who is waiting for the Anti-Christ, The King…a.k.a Dajjal, and who is letting this all happen!
    No wonder the Shia Mahdi…The Dajjal will come from Isfahan, Iran!

    No wonder when Jesus (P.B.U.H) and the real Mahdi arrives they will get rid of these NWO zionist imbeciles, their followers, their created non-religious acts, liberties, freedoms, practices and innovations, and bring PEACE and JUSTICE to the people of the world!

    What you say is happening or will happen after reading it?

  16. man-o-war Avatar

    Who wants to live under this caliphate? I want to be free to eat a double bacon cheese burger and drink an ice cold beer. For dessert I want to munch on some bacon chocolate chip cookies. All while at the beach flirting with the bikini clad Lebanese women. Will this or any other caliphate tolerate this?

    1. Honeysuckle Avatar

      I do

      1. man-o-war Avatar

        More bacon, beer, and women for me ; )

        1. Honeysuckle Avatar

          Ban alcohol. Too much obesity in our society, I only eat fruit and vegetables and occasionally dairy products. Sex is good though lol

          1. man-o-war Avatar

            Ban alcohol? You’re crazy! You can go live with wargame, btru2u, and humptydumpty. BACON, BEER, BOOBS!
            TAKE BEER!!

          2. Honeysuckle Avatar

            Never had it, I prefer honey and a nice suck 😛

          3. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Then you’re missing some fine dark ales ….
            By the way, A fine Scotch used as an after-shave is less expensive per ounce than the perfumed stuff and just drives some women wild. 😉
            I think it’s the ‘woody’ thing … Oak, that is … but maybe certain Peat … hmmm … as always, experiment, since different skins produce different by-products.
            (Have also noticed that Vegans have the WORST-smelling farts.)
            (Along with how to fry Grasshoppers, I attempt to impart experienced wisdom of the really important things one should know. The ‘Theories’ will just make one insane.)

    2. MekensehParty Avatar

      Very educated definition of freedom…

      1. man-o-war Avatar

        Thanks! It means a lot coming from you.

  17. xx`^` Avatar

    Those brainwashed, naive, ignorant, and oblivious to the real history supporters who support the zionist Shia and their stooges and believe they (Shia) the infallible’s are victims and suffered for hundreds of years at the hands of the Sunni’s. These zionist shia’s have been successful in fooling the masses with the VICTIM and OPPRESSED game for centuries since it’s ugly and unholy inception. But all their Taqiyah (deception) has been and is being uncovered and will keep uncovering.
    Here are some excerpts of the proud history of these infallible Shia’s and their treacheries, deceptions, deceits, lies, alliances, allegiances, etc.

    Shi’ite Treachery In Islamic History

    What follows is a brief sketch of Shi’ite intrigues against Islam and Muslims during a few representative periods of Islamic history, past and present, for, to mention all would require a whole book in itself. These are the most notable incidents covered.

    We may encounter the view that a few shia do not represent the whole and this too is not our view. However, it should be known that the shia movement since inception has the ultimate goal of dividing Muslims.

    Before the historic recollection of shia treachery is read, please be aware that Abdullah ibn Saba caused and instigated many upheavals in the ummah since the first Khilafah. The campaign took effect during the khilafah of Sayyiduna Uthman Radhiyallahu anhu which led to much in fighting. Notable treachery became evident in Kufa among the followers of ibn Saba who now were Shi’ite Ali due to his khilafah. This treachery is recorded shamelessly in Nahjul Balaagha, a work on Sayyiduna Alis advices. Ultimately, this treachery saw the Ahlul bayt being persecuted by rebels within the Muslim community and well known shia.

    Let’s move along. …

    During the period of the fourth and fifth Faatimid caliphs, al-Azeez billaah and al-Haakim bi amrillaah (966-1020 CE), Muslims under their rule experienced unimaginable affliction. Both of these caliphs gave the reigns of power to Jewish administrations who spread corruption and tyranny throughout the Muslim realm. And when their Shi’ite governor in the well fortified city of ‘Asqalaan surrendered to the Crusaders, the soldiers and the towns people, unable to bear Shi’ite treachery any longer, revolted and killed the governor in the year 995 CE.

    In the fifth century of the Hijrah during the rule of the Shi’ite Buwayhid clan over Iraq, the Jews were allowed to become very powerful and oppressive. As a result the people of the region revolted against the Buwayhids in the year 1031 CE and burnt the houses of the Shi’ites as well as the houses of the Jews.

    Shi’ites were largely responsible for the Mongols’ sacking of Baghdad in the 7th century. The most noted Shi’ite scholar of the time, an-Naseer at-Tusi rode alongside Hulagu at the head of the Mongol hordes and oversaw with him the slaughter of countless innocent Muslims. The Shi’ite cheif minister (Wazeer), Ibn al-‘Alqamee, also played a major role in that tragedy.

    The tenth century of the Hijrah witnessed Ghayyaath Khudaabundah Muhammad, the Mongol who had converted to Shi’ism, make an alliance with the Crusaders while massacring and terrorizing Sunni Muslims.

    The Jews also attained a very prominent position in the Shi’ite Safavid dynasty during the 10th century of the Hijrah. This Shi’ite dynasty entered into an alliance with the Portuguese against the Ottoman state. However, the Ottoman Sultan replied by killing nearly 30 thousand of them in a single day, teaching them a very severe lesson. He declared them to be merely a group of worthless heretics wearing red turbans with twelve folds.

    12th century: split the Muslim world by breaking Egypt away from the Khilafah and establishing the Fatimid state. This was in the middle of the Crusader period and instead of waging jihad against these foreign occupiers the Shias engaged in a jihad against the Muslims. Alhamdulillah Salahuddin Ayyubi destryoyed these vermin and reunited Egypt with the Muslim lands.

    13th century: aid and abet the Mongol invasions. Collude with them to butcher the Muslims and especially the Ulema. In fact, Iran prior to this time was overwhelmingly Muslim but after the Muslim ulema were butchered the only ‘scholars’ left were Rafidah who succeeded in misleading the population into kufr.

    16th-18th centuries: constant attacks by the Safavids (Shias) upon the Uthmani Khilafah which was storming Europe and bringing Islam to the Balkans and even as far as the gates of Vienna. In fact one of the Austrian kings stated that he was grateful to the Safavids as had it not been for them then the Quran would have been recited in Vienna.

    The stance of most Shi’ites, scholars and laymen alike, towards the Islamic governments throughout history has been, if the government was powerful and well-established, to honour its leaders in con-
    sonance with their tenet of taqiyah, for the purpose of material gain. If, however, the government is weak, or is under attack by enemies, they side with its enemies against it. This is precisely what they did during the last days of the Umayyad dynasty when the Abbasids revolted, under the instigation of the Shi’ites of that era. ln a later time, they took the same criminal stand against the Abbasids who were threatened by the raids of Hulago and his pagan Mongol followers against the Caliphate of Islam and its glorious capital of science and civilization .
    An example of this is seen in the behavior of the Shi’ite philosopher and scholar An-Naseer At-Toosi. He composed poetry in praise of Al-Musta’sim, the Abbasid Caliph, then in 65 A.H. executed a complete turn about, instigating revolution against his patron, thereby hastening the catastrophe which befell Islam in Baghdad, where he headed the butcher Hulago’s blood-letting procession. In fact he personally supervised the slaughter of Muslims, sparing none, not even women, children, or the aged. This same At-Toosi also approved of wholesale dumping of valuable texts of Islamic literature in the Tigris River; its waters ran black for days from the ink of the innumerable manuscripts. Thus vanished a great treasure of the Islamic heritage consisting of works in history, literature, language and poetry, not to mention those in the Islamic religious sciences, which had been passed down from the pious of the first generation of Muslims, and which could be found in abundance until that time when they were destroyed in a cultural holocaust the like of which had never been seen before.

    If these incidents have been forgotten there is always the unforgettable crime of the century wherein the Shi’ite Yahya Khan surrendered the Muslim lands of East Pakistan to the Hindus to do as they pleased. This heinous act led to the formation of the truncated state of Bangladesh.

    And, in Lebanon the Shi’ite betrayal of Muslims and their alliance with Maronite Christians, whom they consider their true friends, cannot be forgotten.

    What have the Shi’ites contributed to the Mujahideen of Afghanistan besides criticism of their Jihad and belittlement of their opposition to the forces of atheism? And, why have the Shi’ite students at the University of Kuwait joined with the communists and other leftists against Sunni Muslim students in the student elections of 1981?

    Lastly, what about the unholy alliance between the Iranian revolution and Nusayri Syria – between Iran and Libya – Iran and Algeria – Iran and South Lebanon?
    Is it because all of them share with the Shi’ites the rejection of some or all of the Sunnah?

    Was it not expected that the “revolution of the opressed” would stand by the opressed in Syria? Is this the reward for kindness? Yes, the reward for the Syrian Mujahideen’s open support for the Iranian revolution was first to be snubbed, then to be criticised for their Jihad. How else are we to understand Ayatullaah Khalkhaali’s public statement against the Syrian Mujahideen, or Khomeini’s representative declaring Syrian Mujahideen disbelievers while he was in London in 1980?

    Why did Shi’ite members of the Kuwaiti National Assembly vote in favour of Hafiz Asad against the Syrian Mujahideen during the vote for sending 48 million dinars to Syrian deterrant forces?

    Current day, Grand Shia Priest Sistani (la) orders the Shia to co-operate with the non Muslim occupation troops and not to rebel or wage jihad against them. Zero or minimal support given by the rafidah to the Muslims who are waging a fierce revolution against tyrant rulers at overwhelming odds.

    We are seeing in the current day Syrian, Iraqi, Lebanese chapter where the shia got and getting clearly uncovered, naked and exposed as Muslim enemies.

    1. man-o-war Avatar

      ABU BAKR FO LIFE! Down with Ya Hussain Obama!


  18. Andre Avatar

    Interesting comments and discussions. Remove religion out of the mix, and there will be a lot less stupidity to spread around the world, and contaminate it with lies. Ignorance (and religion) is nothing to be proud of.

    Establishing a caliphat…what a joke, do these idiots know it’s the 21st century!

    1. Hannibal Avatar

      NOPE! Islamism is an advanced civilization that discovered time travel… They can go back in time at will… 😉

  19. Andre Avatar

    Sisi the opposite of ISIS 🙂 Hmmm!

  20. Alexander Tchaikovsky Avatar
    Alexander Tchaikovsky

    Caliph Ibrahim is the Anti-Christ.

  21. stjohnofthevatican Avatar

    This man is a Kharij! He will cause trouble, which they have been doing since the time of Caliph Ali! The division of Sunnis and Shiites was made worst by Khawarij.

Leave a Reply