British intelligence chiefs blast Edward Snowdon

Share:

Edward SnowdenBritain’s intelligence chiefs used their first ever joint public appearance to complain that documents by former U.S. intelligence operative Edward Snowden had put secret operations at risk and were being “lapped up” by al Qaeda.

In an unprecedented evidence session before parliament that local media likened to a scene from a James Bond film, the heads of Britain’s three main intelligence agencies said Snowden’s disclosures about the mass surveillance they undertake had prompted them to consider being more open about what they do.

But they said parts of their work had to remain secret for national security reasons and that the data leaks, which detailed Britain’s close cooperation with the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), had caused huge damage.

“The leaks from Snowden have been very damaging, they’ve put our operations at risk,” John Sawers, the head of MI6, Britain’s foreign intelligence service, told parliament.

“It’s clear that our adversaries are rubbing their hands with glee, al Qaeda is lapping it up.”

The robust nature of his comments underlined how angry intelligence chiefs are about Snowden and what they believe is the irresponsible way some newspapers published his information despite warnings not to do so.

The leaks have put intelligence chiefs under pressure to be more open about what they do and have prompted a debate about the balance between security and privacy which has led to calls for greater oversight of the agencies’ work.

Andrew Parker the head of M15, John Sawers the head of M16 and Iain Lobban GCHQ director (L-R) are seen attending an Intelligence and Security Committee hearing at Parliament, in this still image taken from video in London November 7, 2013. REUTERS/UK Parliament via REUTERS TV
Andrew Parker the head of M15, John Sawers the head of M16 and Iain Lobban GCHQ director (L-R) are seen attending an Intelligence and Security Committee hearing at Parliament, in this still image taken from video in London November 7, 2013. REUTERS/UK Parliament via REUTERS TV

Iain Lobban, the director of GCHQ, Britain’s electronic eavesdropping agency, told lawmakers that intelligence chiefs were “actively considering” whether more information should now be shared with the public as a result.

Visibly emotional, he argued however that “certain methods” should remain secret and cited what he said were specific examples where the Snowden data leaks had harmed Britain’s national security.

“We’ve seen terrorist groups in the Middle East, in Afghanistan and elsewhere in south Asia discussing the revelations in specific terms,” he said.

“We have actually seen chat around specific terrorist groups who, even close to home, discuss how to avoid what they now perceive to be vulnerable communications methods, or how to select communications which they now perceive not to be exploitable.”

VEIL OF SECRECY FALLS

The fact that the three intelligence chiefs even appeared in public – the head of MI5, Britain’s domestic security service, was also present – was a first in Britain.

In the past, such hearings have been behind closed doors and it was not until 1992 that the name of the head of MI6, formally known as the Secret Intelligence Service, was publicly known.

Sawers, the current head of MI6, wore a green tie, a nod to a quirky tradition which means that the person doing his job writes in green ink and is known internally as “C”.

The hearing, which lasted about 90 minutes, was televised, albeit with a short delay for security reasons.

Civil liberties groups, parts of the media and lawmakers from all parties have argued that Snowden’s disclosures about the scale of GCHQ’s monitoring activities show it has become too powerful and needs to be reined in.

Prime Minister David Cameron has rejected calls for greater oversight, arguing that it is already subject to proper scrutiny and that its work needs to be kept secret to protect national security.

Angered by Snowden’s disclosures, Cameron has accused the American and British newspapers that have published his information of assisting Britain’s enemies by helping them to avoid surveillance by its intelligence agencies.

He has also threatened to stop future publications if necessary.

Reuters

Share:

Comments

10 responses to “British intelligence chiefs blast Edward Snowdon”

  1. 5thDrawer Avatar

    The backlash from it all could become the opposite of what Wikileakers profess to wish for.
    If it goes back to WWII levels of security, most of you won’t be around to hear what happened.
    You’ll need to be satisfied with knowing only that Sharmainly did it with Bobbo and Shirleness.
    And isn’t that what makes the biggest headlines anyway??
    Twits.

  2. 5thDrawer Avatar

    The backlash from it all could become the opposite of what Wikileakers profess to wish for.
    If it goes back to WWII levels of security, most of you won’t be around to hear what happened.
    You’ll need to be satisfied with knowing only that Sharmainly did it with Bobbo and Shirleness.
    And isn’t that what makes the biggest headlines anyway?? Twits.

  3. Reasonableman Avatar
    Reasonableman

    Interesting thought.
    They worry about terrorists in the middle east and so on being a threat to security.
    Why are they a threat to security? How did they become a threat to security? Why are people living in britain feeling ripped off? Who are the real terrorists?
    I guess the wests security and privacy laws are the threat and terrorists of humanity and to themselves not who they claim to be the threat and terrorist.

    1. master09 Avatar

      The issue is every person on this earth has an evil mind and thinks about doing things to benefit only themselves.. so tell me why does COCA COLA not tell the world what goes into that bottle or what is in the secret herb and spice that KFC has. We all have something to hide for many reasons so why is the government any diff be it for the reason to protect humanity or to make a lot of money out of it….Look at the way Russia and China treat and control the people is that any DIFF, or how HA in Lebanon spy on people with the phone lines…THEY ALL DO IT IT,S JUST USA IS THE POWER SO EVERYONE POINTS FINGERS AT THEM…..SIMPLE would you put your bank details on the net for the world to see…..?????

      1. Reasonableman Avatar
        Reasonableman

        I know the issue my issue is maybe certain people have certain things to hide which doesnt concern anybody either. What gives the government or anybody the right to INTENTIONALLY eavesdrop?
        The western security and privacy laws is the inside disease or bug (no puns inteded) which will eat away it popularity.
        Cost effective way for those “scary terrorists” to win popularity 😉
        If we use the logic that the government eavesdrops because they velieve everybody is evil and are waiting for a mistake then all this causes is hate and irrelivant suspicions.
        Its all about control 09 not about security. People cannot be controlled by force they are not robots. Everybody has a brain for a reason. eventually the leak will make a brigger crack and lead to a flood.

  4. Reasonableman Avatar
    Reasonableman

    Interesting thought.
    They worry about terrorists in the middle east and so on being a threat to security.
    Why are they a threat to security? How did they become a threat to security? Why are people living in britain feeling ripped off? Who are the real terrorists?
    I guess the wests security and privacy laws are the threat and terrorists of humanity and to themselves not who they claim to be the threat and terrorist.

    1. master09 Avatar

      The issue is every person on this earth has an evil mind and thinks about doing things to benefit only themselves.. so tell me why does COCA COLA not tell the world what goes into that bottle or what is in the secret herb and spice that KFC has. We all have something to hide for many reasons so why is the government any diff be it for the reason to protect humanity or to make a lot of money out of it….Look at the way Russia and China treat and control the people is that any DIFF, or how HA in Lebanon spy on people with the phone lines…THEY ALL DO IT IT,S JUST USA IS THE POWER SO EVERYONE POINTS FINGERS AT THEM…..SIMPLE would you put your bank details on the net for the world to see…..?????

      1. Reasonableman Avatar
        Reasonableman

        I know the issue my issue is maybe certain people have certain things to hide which doesnt concern anybody either. What gives the government or anybody the right to INTENTIONALLY eavesdrop?
        The western security and privacy laws is the inside disease or bug (no puns inteded) which will eat away it popularity.
        Cost effective way for those “scary terrorists” to win popularity 😉

  5. nigel cairns Avatar
    nigel cairns

    more fear-mongering and no evidence

  6. nigel cairns Avatar
    nigel cairns

    more fear-mongering and no evidence

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *