HRW implicates Syrian leadership in attacks against civilians

Share:

syrian bakery bombedSyrian government forces have bombed bakeries and hospitals and indiscriminately carried out air attacks against civilians, Human Rights Watch said in a newly released report. Such strikes violate the laws of war and should be prosecuted as war crimes, it stated.

Scores of interviews with witnesses and victims of government airstrikes revealed that the Syrian air force had frequently and sometimes deliberately attacked ordinary people, the rights group said.

The air attacks “clearly and irrefutably implicate the senior leadership,” Human Rights Watch researcher Ole Solvang told The Times via email. “Pilots cannot take off with their planes and repeatedly commit war crimes without the knowledge of the senior leadership.”

Hospitals and bakeries were bombarded repeatedly, suggesting they were targeted on purpose. One Aleppo bakery was bombed at least three times in August, twice while people were waiting in line for bread. Two hospitals had been struck seven times by the time Human Rights Watch visited.

“We had just finished surgery and moved to the second floor when the rockets hit,” a doctor at Dar Shifa Hospital in Aleppo told the group. “If they had hit just minutes before, we would have all been dead.”

Even if rebels were in or around that hospital, as Syrian state media and two people interviewed by the group suggested, “the attacks were disproportionate,” the rights group wrote.

Besides the attacks on bakeries and hospitals, Human Rights Watch listed dozens of other cases in which Syrian forces were waging war indiscriminately. For instance, Syrian government forces have used cluster bombs that explode in midair, sending smaller, deadly bomblets over vast areas that can kill anyone in their path, the rights group said.

In November, a jet unleashed cluster bombs on a field where children were playing in Deir Assafeer, killing at least 11 of them, residents told Human Rights Watch. “It sounded like fireworks but of course louder,” one witness said. “Then I heard people screaming and running toward the playground.”

Syria has repeatedly rejected accusations that its forces have committed human rights abuses and says it is taking justified steps to flush out terrorists armed and funded from abroad. Last year, it denied using cluster bombs, calling such assertions “baseless.”

There were 152 civilians slain in the strikes documented in the report, Human Rights Watch said. It found no evidence that any opposition fighters were killed.

Human Rights Watch also criticized Syrian rebels for not doing everything they could to avoid endangering civilians. In earlier reports, it has called on the armed opposition to halt torture and summary killings.

The number of killings chronicled in the new report are a fraction of the deaths reported in Syria by opposition activists. More than 4,300 civilians have been killed by airstrikes since July, according to the Violations Documentation Center, which gathers reports of human rights violations from local activists. Human Rights Watch investigations on the ground were limited to areas held by the Syrian opposition because the government has denied access to other parts of the country.

LA Times

Share:

Comments

28 responses to “HRW implicates Syrian leadership in attacks against civilians”

  1. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    Accuracy of ALL reports still impossible to verify. But there’s a reason for the numbers of refugees …

    1. AntiFSA Avatar

      Yes 5th, most people have fled because what these animals the FSA are doing to them. Like raping woman and children. If you were in their shoes would you hang around. ?

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar
        5thDrawer

        I wouldn’t head for the Congo … OR Burma.

  2. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    Accuracy of ALL reports still impossible to verify. But there’s a reason for the numbers of refugees …

    1. Yes 5th, most people have fled because what these animals the FSA are doing to them. Like raping woman and children. If you were in their shoes would you hang around. ?

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar
        5thDrawer

        I wouldn’t head for the Congo …

  3. Yefim_Feldman Avatar
    Yefim_Feldman

    No, condemnation from the U.N.

  4. Yefim Feldman Avatar
    Yefim Feldman

    No, condemnation from the U.N.

  5. Prophettttt Avatar
    Prophettttt

    Over a million Syrian refugees in Lebanon already.That is equivalent to 7 million Mexicans crossing the border into the united states in the event of an internal Mexican war ,or in the event of any Mexican national disaster. I wonder if the US government,in the name of humanitarian assistance, would allow that to happen. What do you guys think?

    1. AntiFSA Avatar

      Prophet, the US is more than happy to shit anywhere in world as long as it doesn’t land on their front door step. And as long as the rich get richer and poor get poorer.

    2. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      Well, actually, they probably already have. :-)) Just over a longer period of time than a year or two. And let’s face it … somebody NEEDS to pick fruit … who’s doing it in south Liban? Not ‘the resistance’, I’m sure … 😉
      Of course, if people stopped having so damn many kids, they wouldn’t need so many fruit trees. And then even Lebanon could stick with cedars … AND NUTS !!
      Oh … the olives for Martini’s too … :-))

      1. libnan1 Avatar

        OK 5th, don’t be messing with the NUTS … I got them right here. Olives are good for olive oil as well, that is what make a Mankouch so tasty. It is useful for lubrication when needed…..

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar
          5thDrawer

          mmmmmaaasssaggge ,,, yes … the oil 😉
          (extra-virgin, of course .. 😉
          Best nuts anywhere are at ‘Al Rifai’ … and they export. 🙂

  6. Prophettttt Avatar
    Prophettttt

    Over a million Syrian refugees in Lebanon already.That is equivalent to 7 million Mexicans crossing the border into the united states in the event of an internal Mexican war ,or in the event of any Mexican national disaster. I wonder if the US government,in the name of humanitarian assistance, would allow that to happen. What do you guys think?

    1. Prophet, the US is more than happy to shit anywhere in world as long as it doesn’t land on their front door step. And as long as the rich get richer and poor get poorer.

    2. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      Well, actually, they probably already have. :-)) Just over a longer period of time than a year or two. And let’s face it … somebody NEEDS to pick fruit … who’s doing it in south Liban? Not ‘the resistance’, I’m sure … 😉

      1. libnan1 Avatar

        OK 5th, don’t be messing with the NUTS … I got them right here. Olives are good for olive oil as well, that is what make a Mankouch so tasty. It is useful for lubrication when needed…..

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar
          5thDrawer

          mmmmmaaasssaggge ,,, yes … 😉

  7. AntiFSA Avatar

    Hello, Hello, calling the Human Rights Watch, any criticism towards the FSA terrorist, Qatar, Saudi Arabia or Turkey for arming and sheltering these animals. Or just the Assad government as usual.

    1. Prophettttt Avatar
      Prophettttt

      Anti, Yalibnan copied the entire story from LA Times,and decided to give it a different title. lol
      The LA Times story was titled:”Civilian deaths in Syria documented by rights group”,but yalibnan, as usual, decided to sugar coat the story with some propaganda and give it a twist so that it read; “HRW implicates Syrian leadership……..”

      1. AntiFSA Avatar

        I have an idea Prophet, However it will need some support from other bloggers like yourself. I want to put together a petition which will be asking this blog to change it’s name from Yalibnan to Anti Assad. What do you think, Do I have a chance at succeeding. lol

        1. Prophettttt Avatar
          Prophettttt

          No, You have no chance because that would limit the site to one propaganda campaign when it has many others on its agenda..lol

          1. AntiFSA Avatar

            Ah well, it was just an idea.

  8. Hello, Hello, calling the Human Rights Watch, any criticism towards the FSA terrorist, Qatar, Saudi Arabia or Turkey for arming and sheltering these animals. Or just the Assad government as usual.

    1. Prophettttt Avatar
      Prophettttt

      Anti, Yalibnan copied the entire story from LA Times,and decided to give it a different title. lol
      The LA Times story was titled:”Civilian deaths in Syria documented by rights group”,but yalibnan, as usual, decided to sugar coat the story with some propaganda and give it a twist to read; “HRW implicates Syrian leadership……..”

      1. I have an idea Prophet, However it will need some support from other bloggers like yourself. I want to put together a petition which will be asking this blog to change it’s name from Yalibnan to Anti Assad. What do you think, Do I have a chance at succeeding. lol

        1. Prophettttt Avatar
          Prophettttt

          No, You have no chance because that would limit the site to one propaganda campaign when it has many others on its agenda..lol

          1. Ah well, it was just an idea.

Leave a Reply