Syrian opposition chief Moaz al-Khatib quits

Share:

khatib  mouaz syria opposition chiefThe leader of the opposition Syrian National Coalition (SNC), Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib, has resigned.

In a statement on his Facebook page, Mr Khatib said he was leaving the job as he wanted to work with more freedom than an official institution allowed.

He had promised the Syrian people he would resign if what he called certain red lines were reached, he said.

He appeared to criticise the world community for not doing enough to stop two years of bloodshed in Syria.

His resignation comes a day after European Union foreign ministers failed to resolve their differences over whether to exempt Syrian rebels from an arms embargo.

Mr Khatib, who was elected head of the SNC in November 2012, is seen as a respected and unifying figure in Syria.

But he caused controversy by offering talks with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, on condition that 160,000 prisoners were freed.

The opposition had previously insisted President Assad step down before any talks begin.

‘Vicious regime’

Mr Khatib’s resignation comes days after Ghassan Hitto was chosen as prime minister in rebel-held areas, an appointment that he is thought to have objected to.

But he said he would continue to work with colleagues who were seeking the freedom of the Syrian people.

“I announce my resignation from the National Coalition, so that I can work with a freedom that cannot possibly be had in an official institution,” he said in the statement.

“For the past two years, we have been slaughtered by an unprecedentedly vicious regime, while the world has looked on,” Mr Khatib added.

“All the destruction of Syria’s infrastructure, the detention of tens of thousands of people, the forced flight of hundreds of thousands and other forms of suffering have been insufficient for the international community to take a decision to allow the people to defend themselves.”

BBC Middle East analyst Sebastian Usher says a key reason for the international community’s concern is anxiety over divisions within the Syrian opposition itself, and Mr Khatib’s action may only intensify those concerns.

In a separate development, the rebel Free Syrian Army announced that it was refusing to recognise Mr Hitto, saying he had been forced on the opposition coalition and not adopted by consensus.

In last Monday’s vote in Istanbul, Turkey, Mr Hitto won with 35 out of 48 votes, in what coalition leaders described as a “transparent, democratic” election.

But some senior coalition leaders are reported to have withdrawn from the vote in protest over Mr Hitto’s lack of military experience.

BBC

Share:

Comments

4 responses to “Syrian opposition chief Moaz al-Khatib quits”

  1. abdo ajrouche Avatar
    abdo ajrouche

    What a little Bitch can’t even fight for what he believes in next in line please

  2. abdo ajrouche Avatar
    abdo ajrouche

    What a little Bitch can’t even fight for what he believes in next in line please

  3. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    Is a ‘prime minister’ supposed to be a ‘military man’ or a ‘political man’?
    And probably al-Khatib can’t say what he wants to say and be ‘politically correct’ at the same time. But that is not a good reason to throw the hands up and walk away – why can’t he say it?
    Initially they didn’t ‘need’ foreign help … wanted to be revolting on their own. No-one thought Assad would be more revolting. When it turned out he was, ‘the world’ wasn’t ready for the depth of the depravity that happens in a revolting ‘WAR’, or the leap by other revolting factions into the fray for their own ideologies.
    After 2 years it’s a revolting level of humans casting blame here and there … as much as possible ignoring the plight of humans in general.
    And may the person who coined that phrase ‘red line’ be hung by his tongue – or forced to watch YouTube 27/7 (7/24 for arabs) for a year at least.

  4. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    Is a ‘prime minister’ supposed to be a ‘military man’ or a ‘political man’?
    And probably al-Khatib can’t say what he wants to say and be ‘politically correct’ at the same time. But that is not a good reason to throw the hands up and walk away – why can’t he say it?
    Initially they didn’t ‘need’ foreign help … wanted to be revolting on their own. No-one thought Assad would be more revolting. When it turned out he was, ‘the world’ wasn’t ready for the depth of the depravity that happens in a revolting ‘WAR’, or the leap by other revolting factions into the fray for their own ideologies.
    After 2 years it’s a revolting level of humans casting blame here and there … as much as possible ignoring the plight of humans in general.
    And may the person who coined that phrase ‘red line’ be hung by his tongue – or forced to watch YouTube 27/7 (7/24 for arabs) for a year at least.

Leave a Reply