Military intervention may be only solution in Syria: SNC

Share:

The opposition Syrian National Council (SNC) said on Wednesday it was coming to the view that military intervention was the only solution to the nearly year-old crisis that has killed thousands in Syria.

“We are really close to seeing this military intervention as the only solution. There are two evils, military intervention or protracted civil war,” Basma Kodmani, a senior SNC official, told a press conference in Paris.

Kodmani said the SNC was also proposing that Russia, which has vetoed action against the Syrian government in the U.N. Security Council, help persuade Damascus to guarantee safe passage to humanitarian convoys ferrying aid to civilians.

“In order to not militarize, the idea is to ask Russia to exert pressure on the regime not to target humanitarian corridors,” she said. Kodmani said the SNC proposed setting up corridors from Lebanon to the besieged city of Homs, from Turkey to Idlib and from Jordan to Deraa.

The SNC will also urge Egypt, at a Friends of Syria meeting due to be held in Tunis on Friday, to restrict access to the Suez Canal to any ships carrying weapons to the Syrian regime.

Russia: No to humanitarian corridors

Russia said Wednesday it opposed establishing humanitarian corridors for reaching civilians in Syria.

A top official said Russia was not backing a call by France to set up actual humanitarian corridors for delivering assistance to flashpoints such as Homs because these would require support from foreign troops.

“Creating these corridors would hardly be effective,” Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov said.

“This would require special mechanism and forces, and logically speaking, this could lead to the use of force, should things go wrong.”

He said the idea backed by Moscow and the ICRC was to ensure “a humanitarian pause — not humanitarian corridors.”

The Kremlin separately reported that President Dmitry Medvedev discussed the crisis by a telephone with Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdel Aziz.

“Dmitry Medvedev and King Abdullah exchanged views about the situation in the Middle East in the light of the events in Syria,” the Kremlin said without providing further details.

Russia has firmly resisted foreign military intervention in the country and together with China vetoed two UN Security Council resolutions condemning Moscow’s traditional ally Assad for the violence.

Gatilov said Russia was growing increasing concerned by reports that the armed opposition groups were receiving military assistance from abroad.

“That the armed opposition is receiving support is a well-established fact,” he told reporters.

“The shipments that cross the border from Lebanon…. support the armed opposition. We feel this only feeds and escalates the situation.”

Russia has emerged as Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s closest international ally and its support for a truce puts pressure on the regime to open the border to foreign supplies.

But Russia has refused to single out Assad for criticism and on Wednesday again called on both his forces and the armed opposition to end the violence.

Reuters, AFP

Share:

Comments

21 responses to “Military intervention may be only solution in Syria: SNC”

  1. The war drums beating, people get excited and its all done in the name of Humanity and democracy. Just like the democracy we gave Iraq with a few million dead, sectarian strife and Iranian influence over a shia majority all in the name of democracy and finding wmd that never even existed. Do you you really trust your governments any more? Im no fan of Assad but I do understand that every time the west gets involved in our business everything ends up worst than it was before. I feel like this is all a plot to bring us closer to the Albert Pike 3rd world war so humanity can be controlled like cattle.  

    If a politician says that he intends to reduce the national debt by 50% we call him a liar, If he says I’ll reduce your taxes by 90% we call him a liar, If he is in church praying we say he is doing it to get votes and as soon as they say they want to bomb a country we all get excited!!!

    Since when are problems solved with war? What kind of people are we? Why this push in the Middle East now?
    They always act like they need to bomb the hell out of a country for humanity and then they kill 5000 times more people the so called conflict had claimed.

    These dictators were put in power and allowed to stay in power for decades. This is not the first time civilians die in Syria or in the Middle East. I also dont understand why Bahrain is a Iranian project and gets almost no coverage from any media outlets and Syria is a true revolution.

    I am not a regime supporter but Im also mature enough to know that once the U.N and Nato type nations get involved in anything its normally ruined for good.

  2.  Avatar

    The war drums beating, people get excited and its all done in the name of Humanity and democracy. Just like the democracy we gave Iraq with a few million dead, sectarian strife and Iranian influence over a shia majority all in the name of democracy and finding wmd that never even existed. Do you you really trust your governments any more? Im no fan of Assad but I do understand that every time the west gets involved in our business everything ends up worst than it was before. I feel like this is all a plot to bring us closer to the Albert Pike 3rd world war so humanity can be controlled like cattle.  

    1.  Avatar

       I hate to say it, but people in the middle east are already treated like cattle by their regimes and always have been…u dont need to come up with any big elaborate conspiracy theory to see that…also the iraq fiasco and this are worlds apart, cant compare the two, although looking back i’d say the tyrant got what was coming to him. when a govt goes rogue and starts using its military might against its own populace then all lines have been crossed and its open game for the world to do some much needed ass kicking.

      1.  Avatar

         Its not a conspiracy its reality. Im taking about people in the U.S being subjected to fear so our rights and civil liberates can be taken away from us under the idea that its good for our safty. If you think bringing down these dictators will change anything then take a good look a Libya where militias are still running around clashing with one another and refusing to surrender the weapons they have and are each controlled by a warlord and Egypt where the Military witch protected Mubarak simply took over and is refusing to let go of most of the power even after presidential elections in June.

        Sadam may have been a dictator but he was put in place and allowed to stay in place. He asked the U.S ambassador if invading Kuwait would offend the U.S and she said no. Then they declared war on him for doing it in the first gulf war.

        In the end over a million Iraqi people dead…… 

        1.  Avatar

           I agree about the iraq mess…truth is its not up to us what the outcome is in any of these nations. its up to the people what they do after the clean up. Justice should never take a back seat to fear of the outcome. Assad is going down and justice will be served, will Syria be a better place without him? probably not, but thats up to the Syrians to decide…

        2.  Avatar

           Fadi81, I agree its up to the Syrian people not Nato to decide or the SNC witch if you ask most of the protesters on the ground are not really the chosen ones to represent them. After Assad falls Syria will be in chaos for years and more and more people will die as a result of it. Youre telling me that if the U.S wanted to get rid of Assad they could not have had him killed on one of his visits along with his brother. This is a recipe for disaster and will either divide Syria or send the country into civil war and its all done so weapons can be sold to both sides. Do you think Nato just gave the Libyans weapons for free? No they sent them the bill and now a country witched owned its own central bank and had no public debt is not only in chaos but also has a IMF owned central bank issuing currency to the government with interest sinking it deeper into dept and had a few billion dollars in loans and debt already. If they wanted regime change they could bribe a few generals with a coupe of billion dollars or a few bathist party members in Syria and overthrow the Government with the president was on an official visit or have his plane crash…..

      2.  Avatar

        Fadi, atleast with Saddam Hussein Iraq was still 7% Christian, and Christians were allowed to celebrate their holidays. Theres hardly anymore Christians in Iraq nowadays. Plus the Americas created a Shi’ite-Sunni strife. Hate it or love it but forgetting the Mukhabarat and Saddams brutal Baath government, Iraq still prospered economic wise, army wise, and religion wise. If the West gets involved military wise, we are going to have American vs Russian tensions and most likely it will be a repeated Iraq, while all the Sunnis and Alawites are killing each other, while the Christians will be killed by both sides. Let America arm the opposition and screw off, thats what they should have done in Iraq, there was an opposition in Iraq but America didnt arm them. Or America can do the same shit as Iraq in Syria and go kill 1 million innocent civilians again and make them even more hated by the Arab world than they already are. 

        1.  Avatar

          yes I dont disagree that Iraq was a mess, as I stated above. I never supported or agreed with the push for ‘wmd’ and regime change….but I disagree with your statement that the US created sunni shia tension, I believe its always been there and always will be as long as moslems allow it to be so. And as far as Christians in Iraq being safe under Saddam, I dont disagree, but one groups safety over another is unacceptable (Saddam slaughtered many kurds as well as others under his rule). Also if the US did not invade but rather armed the opposition as you say, than I would think the same outcome would be inevitable had the opposition successfuly removed Saddam. The root of the problem is the lack of evolution/civility/education amongst the mass’ in these islamic countries. They are brain washed with ridiculous religious beliefs. People have to know where to draw the line with religion, its ok to have faith and belief in the history of your religion but once it becomes clear that religion is endorsing hate and intolerance towards others it truely becomes the downfall of the people, community and nation..

      3.  Avatar

        Fadi correction there was already Sunni Shiite hate but America gave the spark to the killings. No doubt the killing of Kurds was wrong, good night fadi.

        1.  Avatar

          I agree the US definitely set off the spark and created the conditions for the tensions to amplify…lets hope the Iraqi’s can turn their country around and prove to themselves and the world that all the lives lost were not in vain…Good night to you as well Beiruti

  3. 5thDrawer Avatar

    Open some corridors for a week or two, advertise safe passage especially for women and children and where to go, and let the ones who don’t want to live in a war-zone walk and bus out … then close the doors and let them go to it.
    Enlarge the camps and care for the people. Less bloody and expensive than sending in troops that no-one wants anyway.

  4.  Avatar

    Open some corridors for a week or two, advertise safe passage especially for women and children and where to go, and let the ones who don’t want to live in a war-zone walk and bus out … then close the doors and let them go to it.
    Enlarge the camps and care for the people. Less bloody and expensive than sending in troops that no-one wants anyway.

Leave a Reply