Russian FM: “We Are not Friends or Allies of Assad.”

Share:

MUNICH — With the United States and the European Union imposing unprecedented economic sanctions against Iran, and the lingering threat of an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, it was expected that Iran would be a big issue here at the annual Munich Security Conference that opened on Friday.

Hardly a word.

This was despite the presence of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was expected this weekend to try to persuade her Russian counterpart, Sergey Lavrov, to support more sanctions against the Islamic Republic, but behind the scenes.

But what hit the top of the agenda here was Syria.

In her speech to the conference, Mrs. Clinton said she was trying to win wide support from the international community for the U.N. proposal, initiated by the Arab League, to end the violent crackdown by President Bashar al-Assad’s security forces and arrange a transition of power.

Hours later, Russia and China vetoed that proposal. But before that happened, Mr. Lavrov delivered a rather polemical speech. The question and answer period was dominated by Syria.

Why, asked participants, wouldn’t Russia support the Arab League proposals? Why was Russia still supplying arms to the Syrian regime? Why was Russia supporting President Assad?

Mr. Lavrov took the questions in his stride. The veteran diplomat said from early on Russia had supported calls by the Syrian people for change.

But while it was all very well to ask the security forces to stop the violence and return to their barracks, he said, what about asking the armed groups who were causing mayhem to disarm? They were not being criticized at all, Mr. Lavrov said.

As for Russia supporting the Assad regime, Mr. Lavrov denied that. “We are not friends or allies of Assad,” he said — despite Moscow’s decades-long political and military support of Damascus.

“Whether we sold weapons to Syria did not change the balance in the Middle East. Whatever we sell to Syria does not affect the international balance,” Mr. Lavrov said.

Senator John McCain was having none of it. “It’s time to stop the talking. It’s time to demand Assad’s departure, and now,” he said. The audience applauded.

After the Russian and Chinese veto, Mrs. Clinton held a press conference. She said she had spoken to Mr. Lavrov. Then, she asked, “Are we going to be complicit in the violence and bloodshed in Syria?”

Reports circulated Saturday night that Mr. Lavrov would head to Damascus next week for talks.

IHT

Share:

Comments

  1. MeYosemite Avatar
    MeYosemite

    With this veto, I think Russia and China just dug Assad’s grave, knowingly or unknowingly.

  2.  Avatar

    With this veto, I think Russia and China just dug Assad’s grave, knowingly or unknowingly.

  3. 5thDrawer Avatar

    As I said before, there were no ‘armed groups’ causing mayhem until the numbers of tortures, beatings and maiming and deaths of all ages of people, and deaths to children with bullets through heads – picked off like turkeys at random – got to a point of feelings for the NEED of self-presevation, and eventual armed rebellion.
     For the Russian to even give mouth to the propaganda of Assad is ludicrous.
     Assad’s people stripping skin off children in a hospital or prison is the atrocity, and it was not the protesting-peacefully people looking for some form of democracy who were doing the shooting. Assad created the eventual need for those ‘armed groups’, and those ‘armed groups’ will be happy that some neighbours were willing to take them in and save their lives. To give them a chance.
    And WHEN there is a new democracy in Syria, it will not be those ‘armed groups’ who are still beating and killing people in places where some democracy and freedom of thought is desired. Those who suffer most also know when to stop the suffering.
    Iranians did not have the chance before they were beaten down. It is a hope in Syria still.
    And it seems like the American revolution bloodbath, and French revolution bloodbath, they will need to do it on their own. Perhaps they will be stronger in mind and character for having done it basically on their own.
    And Russia may have just lost it’s naval base ….

    1. 5th you either get up really early or go to bed really late if you are in tripoli time zone lol. you are correct that the damage is done and irreversable without things getting much worse, personally i believe the innocent pay the heaviest price in any war and i dont wish it upon syrian peole or any people for that matter but it would be hard to believe that people are capable of backing down after the mind altering violence they are subjected to and especially in homs,, 200 dead yesterday is nothing to sneeze at, i dont believe he is capable of beating his subjects into obedience this time.

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Hi Geo. At my age, sleep is when it happens. 🙂
        And yes … the violence often lives on in minds … revenge is potent … but there is hope for a government that will not propagate it.
        And in Syria there IS hope.

      2. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Hi Geo. At my age, sleep is when it happens. 🙂
        And yes … the violence often lives on in minds … revenge is potent … but there is hope for a government that will not propagate it.
        And in Syria there IS hope.

  4.  Avatar

    As I said before, there were no ‘armed groups’ causing mayhem until the numbers of tortures, beatings and maiming and deaths of all ages of people, and deaths to children with bullets through heads – picked off like turkeys at random – got to a point of feelings for the NEED of self-presevation, and eventual armed rebellion.
     For the Russian to even give mouth to the propaganda of Assad is ludicrous.
     Assad’s people stripping skin off children in a hospital or prison is the atrocity, and it was not the protesting-peacefully people looking for some form of democracy who were doing the shooting. Assad created the eventual need for those ‘armed groups’, and those ‘armed groups’ will be happy that some neighbours were willing to take them in and save their lives. To give them a chance.
    And WHEN there is a new democracy in Syria, it will not be those ‘armed groups’ who are still beating and killing people in places where some democracy and freedom of thought is desired. Those who suffer most also know when to stop the suffering.
    Iranians did not have the chance before they were beaten down. It is a hope in Syria still.
    And it seems like the American revolution bloodbath, and French revolution bloodbath, they will need to do it on their own. Perhaps they will be stronger in mind and character for having done it basically on their own.
    And Russia may have just lost it’s naval base ….

    1. 5th you either get up really early or go to bed really late if you are in tripoli time zone lol. you are correct that the damage is done and irreversable without things getting much worse, personally i believe the innocent pay the heaviest price in any war and i dont wish it upon syrian peole or any people for that matter but it would be hard to believe that people are capable of backing down after the mind altering violence they are subjected to and especially in homs,, 200 dead yesterday is nothing to sneeze at, i dont believe he is capable of beating his subjects into obedience this time.

      1.  Avatar

        Hi Geo. At my age, sleep is when it happens. 🙂
        And yes … the violence often lives on in minds … revenge is potent … but there is hope for a government that will not propagate it.
        And in Syria there IS hope.

      2.  Avatar

        Hi Geo. At my age, sleep is when it happens. 🙂
        And yes … the violence often lives on in minds … revenge is potent … but there is hope for a government that will not propagate it.
        And in Syria there IS hope.

  5. Patience2 Avatar

    Lying Russian bastard.

    1.  Once again I am in complete agreement

    2.  Once again I am in complete agreement

  6.  Avatar

    Lying Russian bastard.

    1.  Once again I am in complete agreement

Leave a Reply