67th Lebanese Independence: A Cruel Joke

Share:

By Ghassan Karam

Sovereignty and independence, you cannot have one without the other. These two ideas form the basis upon which states are formed.  Unfortunately there is no international standard that requires a state to demonstrate that it meets the prerequisites of statehood if it wishes international recognition and if it wishes to be entitled to the privileges that accrue with such recognition.

Lebanon, within its current borders, was created by the French mandate in 1926 and was ultimately declared an independent nation on November 22, 1943 upon the release of the Lebanese detainees from Rashia. Yes Lebanon is 67 years young today and deserves to recognize this day if for nothing else but managing to survive through the past 67 tumultuous years. But survive is barely what it has done.

Right from the first moment of its inception as an independent state Lebanon found a way to institutionalize, implicitly, its sectarianian structure. What looked at the time as a wise and accommodative decision on the part of the President and Beshara Al Khoury and the PM Riad Al Solh has evolved to be a great historical error that has prevented Lebanon from ever attaining any of its potential. It is a sad occasion indeed when a country celebrates its 67th anniversary of independence while it has no independence, no sovereignty and no state to show for its efforts.

Where have the last 67 years gone? They have been wasted in squabbles, conflicts, civil wars and in paying fealty to political feudal lords and religious leaders. Lebanon has spent every second of its existence so far trying to maintain the illusion that there is a state when in reality what we have become is nothing more than a sectarian federation of residents with no allegiances to a state.

Lebanon has failed to grow the idea of citizenship among its residents who are willing and anxious to do the bidding of any state as long as it is not Lebanese under the mistaken and deadly rationale of sectarian balance. Yes we have managed to keep a sectarian balance of sorts but we have failed to create a state. “No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other.”  You cannot devote your life to the promotion of a sect at the expense of the state. Religion, faith, sectarian wellbeing should be a private affair and must never be allowed to dictate national policy. When we let that happen, which is exactly what we have done for 67 years, then we become what we are, a nation of pretenders.  We pretend to be free, we pretend to be independent, we pretend to be sovereign we pretend to have a state.

All is not lost. We can still redeem ourselves but our first act must be to take an oath of allegiance to an idea, to freedom, democracy, human rights and total unquestioning allegiance to a state that is not based on sectarian principles and discriminatory practices. We can still actualize our dream of establishing a state worthy of the name but in order to do that we have no choice but to relegate religious leaders to their spiritual roles only. We have to forge an identity that is not primarily defined by our religious faith but by our civil rights. We have to shout it from the roof tops that the emperor has no clothes.

If we are to save the Lebanese experiment then we have no choice but to establish the power of the state all over the land and to elect the best and the brightest to positions of power no matter what god they pray to or even whether they pray at all. The last thing that we need to hear tomorrow (today) is an empty rhetoric from a president who was unconstitutionally elected praising accommodations with a party that acts as a state within a state and whose major concern is the appeasement of our neighbourly dictator or land or absolute monarch.

The Lebanese experiment has is still alive after 67 years but barely so. We are on life support, in all fields. Unless we come back to our senses in order to renounce all the traditional leaders and reject sectarianism then we should not complain once this essentially noble experiment comes crashing down.  It is not too late to save the day but such drastic action requires more than wishful thinking. Are we up to it? Time will tell but don’t forget that time is running out.

Share:

Comments

54 responses to “67th Lebanese Independence: A Cruel Joke”

  1. Lebanon is a paradoxical state ever since its birth in November 22, 1943.

    Today we are celebrating Lebanon’s 67th birthday and this comes in a time of deep political divisions and crisis threatening the breakup of Lebanese fomula.
    The sectarian elites of Lebanon have always resorted to the so called “consensus formula” and this has become a norm whenever the country faces existential crises relating to the current existing social order.
    As we know in the past both Egypt and France were the main patron states of Lebanon their role was not only to dominate the political facade of the country but also to defuse buildup tensions. Later after the post-Taef accords this privilege was bestowed to Syria and Saudi Arabia.
    This shows that Lebanon has never evolved to the stage of political maturity and the prospects for the future seems very bleak.
    Now allow me to highlight the internal contradictions that have become discernible among journalists and all those who have visited and studied about Lebanon.
    Back in 1974, I was told that Lebanon just prior to the civil war the country was witnessing the peak of tourism and economic boom.
    The simple paradox at that time was although some part of Lebanon was busy enjoying themselves while watching the famous Egyptian Belly dancer Nadia Jamal the other part of Lebanon was arming themselves and preparing for a long vicious war.
    Moreover, let me also mention this the GNP in 1974 was one of the highest in the region Lebanon was just behind Kuwait and yet most ordinery Lebanese who were living in the periphery and shanty towns were systemically marginalized and repressed.

    Now after some 36 years later we find ourselves stuck with the same politicians and the same the social and economical paradoxes. The question is it worth continuing the same destructive path.
    Finally, Mr.Karam, time is running out indeed. At the moment, the ongoing problems in Lebanon seem very much irrevocable due to the nature of this country which this includes the presence of traditional leaders and a system that can neither be reformed nor changed under the present status quo. It can only be abolished and that seems a utopian dream under the present circumstances.
    Sebouh Akharjalian

    1. Ghassankaram Avatar
      Ghassankaram

      As rotten as things are in Lebanon I do not think that the alternative ; accomodations with Syria; is any better. Maybe that is the only reason not to pull the plug.

      1. Once upon a time there was, is, will be Lebanon; a land that is sandwiched between conflicts and world and regional interests, and that essential Lebanese had nothing to with, and nor able to force or change themselves for a new status. I believe the map of the MEA is being redrawn, again, as we speak, since the old map as described by Mr. Karam would be different soon. When that will be? it is determined by big players as they see fit ( days months, but not years) Eurasia is the focus, and Lebanon is a variable in this equation. I pray that LBN will not be another Iraq.

    2. Ghassankaram Avatar
      Ghassankaram

      As rotten as things are in Lebanon I do not think that the alternative ; accomodations with Syria; is any better. Maybe that is the only reason not to pull the plug.

      1. Once upon a time there was, is, will be Lebanon; a land that is sandwiched between conflicts and world and regional interests, and that essential Lebanese had nothing to with, and nor able to force or change themselves for a new status. I believe the map of the MEA is being redrawn, again, as we speak, since the old map as described by Mr. Karam would be different soon. When that will be? it is determined by big players as they see fit ( days months, but not years) Eurasia is the focus, and Lebanon is a variable in this equation. I pray that LBN will not be another Iraq.

  2.  Avatar

    Lebanon is a paradoxical state ever since its birth in November 22, 1943.

    Today we are celebrating Lebanon’s 67th birthday and this comes in a time of deep political divisions and crisis threatening the breakup of Lebanese fomula.

    The sectarian elites of Lebanon have always resorted to the so called “consensus formula” and this has become a norm whenever the country faces existential crises relating to the current existing social order.

    As we know in the past both Egypt and France were the main patron states of Lebanon their role was not only to dominate the political facade of the country but also to defuse buildup tensions. Later after the post-Taef accords this privilege was bestowed to Syria and Saudi Arabia.

    This shows that Lebanon has never evolved to the stage of political maturity and the prospects for the future seems very bleak.

    Now allow me to highlight the internal contradictions that have become discernible among journalists and all those who have visited and studied about Lebanon.

    Back in 1974, I was told that Lebanon just prior to the civil war the country was witnessing the peak of tourism and economic boom.

    The simple paradox at that time was although some part of Lebanon was busy enjoying themselves while watching the famous Egyptian Belly dancer Nadia Jamal the other part of Lebanon was arming themselves and preparing for a long vicious war.

    Moreover, let me also mention this the GNP in 1974 was one of the highest in the region Lebanon was just behind Kuwait and yet most ordinery Lebanese who were living in the periphery and shanty towns were systemically marginalized and repressed.

    Now after some 36 years later we find ourselves stuck with the same politicians and the same the social and economical paradoxes. The question is it worth continuing the same destructive path.

    Finally, Mr.Karam, time is running out indeed. At the moment, the ongoing problems in Lebanon seem very much irrevocable due to the nature of this country which this includes the presence of traditional leaders and a system that can neither be reformed nor changed under the present status quo. It can only be abolished and that seems a utopian dream under the present circumstances.

    Sebouh Akharjalian

    1.  Avatar

      As rotten as things are in Lebanon I do not think that the alternative ; accomodations with Syria; is any better. Maybe that is the only reason not to pull the plug.

      1. Once upon a time there was, is, will be Lebanon; a land that is sandwiched between conflicts and world and regional interests, and that essential Lebanese had nothing to with, and nor able to force or change themselves for a new status. I believe the map of the MEA is being redrawn, again, as we speak, since the old map as described by Mr. Karam would be different soon. When that will be? it is determined by big players as they see fit ( days months, but not years) Eurasia is the focus, and Lebanon is a variable in this equation. I pray that LBN will not be another Iraq.

  3. PROPHET.T Avatar

    Ghassan,
    I command you for not giving up. I just wonder where you get this optimism from .
    The task ahead is tremendous, but the tools are so little. The will does not exist.
    Nations are built by leaders who have visions. Structuring a national identity requires many tools; Leaders, laws, and most importantly, loyalty to the nation being built.
    None of these factors are in place. Lebanese have yet to agree on a definition of the nation they are supposed to be loyal to.
    Although, they may have had the best of intentions, early builders of Lebanon were wrong. They loved the idea of building an independent nation, but they applied, as you described, rotten, and outdated tools, and we end up with a rotten dysfunctional state.
    I wish I could be as optimistic as you are. I don’t see a promising leadership that would lead the hard work of building on such a noble idea, nor do I foresee it in the future. All I see is; the same leadership that inherited this rotten system, creating more of it, and passing on the rotten torch to their miracle children.
    Religious leaders will never give up the power they have. Every day they use scare tactics, to ensure the loyalty and support of the followers.
    I share your dream of having a true independent Lebanon where everyone’s loyalty is to the state instead of the sect or the leader. But I ‘m afraid this will always be a dream. I can’t imagine this dream becoming true any time soon, not in my life time at least, lol

    1. Ghassankaram Avatar
      Ghassankaram

      Prophet,
      It would be difficult to imagine a country that is more divided and more dysfunctional than Lebanon has been . That in a sense is a positive development since it shows that the conflict between the major parties is at a very high level of tension. Usually such conditions result in a resolution that would be a movement in the right direction. Is this going to happen? when is it going to happen?and how far would the changes go is the proverbial $64 million question? 🙂

      1. All due respect this vision is myopic and lacks the thinking outside the box. PROPHET.T has a good point passing on the rotten torch to their miracle children and would add illiterates about nation building.

      2. PROPHET.T Avatar

        Well, I’m not holding my breath, I’ll pass on my dream.
        I may have a better chance of hitting the mega pot and win $64 million ,than seeing this dream becomes reality in my life time ,lol
        I wish you had not included this picture of the “protectors of the nation” with your article. I had to turn off the TV this morning, when they showed them standing on the podium.They have no shame.

      3. We must continue to hope and to have dreams!One of the poet says that we must hold fast to dreams for life without dreams is like a frozen field where nothing grows!We all dream to have an ideal state where there is separation of religion and politics,where there is loyalty to the state only and not to groups that are struggling for power and after their own political interests at the expense of the welfare of the people!We dream to have states built on justice and equality for all,that have governments that act in accordance with the needs of their people ,protect their freedoms ,all freedoms,provide security and social needs.We must continue to dream a

        1. Ghassankaram Avatar
          Ghassankaram

          Fauzia,
          I am very conflicted when dreams are discussed. this might be a semantical divide but I do believe that one cannot base future visions on a pure dream only. We must have a plan of action otherwise dreams will be only that, dreams. As I have said before, no matter how hard I wish it pigs just don’t fly. Dreams must be anchored in reality to have the chance of making an impact. I am not certain that we are in disagreement but I feel that it must be made clear that our dreams are not simply utopian ideas but are made up of concepts that can be achieved.

        2. Our dream only happens when all the bad apples get eradicated from LBN political system and replaced with such a vision; of all man created equally, no favoritism at all level for any group, religion, sect, believe, etc.,.

    2. Ghassankaram Avatar
      Ghassankaram

      Prophet,
      It would be difficult to imagine a country that is more divided and more dysfunctional than Lebanon has been . That in a sense is a positive development since it shows that the conflict between the major parties is at a very high level of tension. Usually such conditions result in a resolution that would be a movement in the right direction. Is this going to happen? when is it going to happen?and how far would the changes go is the proverbial $64 million question? 🙂

      1. PROPHET.T Avatar

        Well, I’m not holding my breath, I’ll pass on my dream.
        I may have a better chance of hitting the mega pot and win $64 million ,than seeing this dream becomes reality in my life time ,lol
        I wish you had not included this picture of the “protectors of the nation” with your article. I had to turn off the TV this morning, when they showed them standing on the podium.They have no shame.

    3. Prophet, I agree with you on all accounts

  4. PROPHET.T Avatar

    Ghassan,

    I command you for not giving up. I just wonder where you get this optimism from .

    The task ahead is tremendous, but the tools are so little. The will is not there.

    Nations are built by leaders who have visions. The idea of structuring a national identity requires many tools; Leaders, laws, and most importantly, loyalty to the nation being built.

    None of these factors are in place. Lebanese have yet to agree on a definition of the nation they are supposed to be loyal to?

    Although, they may have had the best of intentions, early builders of Lebanon were wrong. They loved the idea of building an independent nation, but they applied, as you described, rotten, and outdated tools, and we end up with a rotten dysfunctional state.

    I wish I could be as optimistic as you are. I don’t see a promising leadership that would lead the hard work of building on such a noble idea, nor do I foresee it in the future. All I see is; the same leadership that inherited this rotten system, creating more of it, and passing on the rotten torch to their miracle children.

    Religious leaders will never give up the power they have. Every day they use scare tactics, to ensure the loyalty and support of the followers.

    I share your dream of having a true independent Lebanon where everyone’s loyalty is to the state instead of the sect or the leader. But I ‘m afraid this will always be a dream. I can’t imagine this dream becoming true any time soon, not in my life time at least, lol

    1.  Avatar

      Prophet,
      It would be difficult to imagine a country that is more divided and more dysfunctional than Lebanon has been . That in a sense is a positive development since it shows that the conflict between the major parties is at a very high level of tension. Usually such conditions result in a resolution that would be a movement in the right direction. Is this going to happen? when is it going to happen?and how far would the changes go is the proverbial $64 million question? 🙂

      1. All due respect this vision is myopic and lacks the thinking outside the box. PROPHET.T has a good point passing on the rotten torch to their miracle children and would add illiterates about nation building.

      2. PROPHET.T Avatar

        Well, I’m not holding my breath, I’ll pass on my dream.

        I may have a better chance of hitting the mega pot and win $64 million ,than seeing this dream becomes reality in my life time ,lol

        I wish you had not included this picture of the “protectors of the nation” with your article. I had to turn off the TV this morning, when they showed them standing on the podium.They have no shame.

      3. PROPHET.T Avatar

        Well, I’m not holding my breath, I’ll pass on my dream.

        I may have a better chance of hitting the mega pot and win $64 million ,than seeing this dream becomes reality in my life time ,lol

        I wish you had not included this picture of the “protectors of the nation” with your article. I had to turn off the TV this morning, when they showed them standing on the podium.They have no shame.

    2.  Avatar

      Prophet, I agree with you on all accounts

  5. Lebanon is not ready for your ideas that are in theory correct and ideal…in fact too ideal that it scares everyone who is currently in power.

    There is one solution for Lebanon to become a real state…..it should be ruled by a dectatore through for few years , martial law should be enforced during te reign of this dectatore. In other words this dectatore’s main role would be to put new formulas that structures and form the new state…. who said democracy is what lebanon needs by the way….why does every damn analyst keeps on repeating that lebanon should be a democracy and lebanon should be ARABIC.

    Explain something, how willl you have a proper democracy in a country like lebanon that is divided socially, politically and demographically based on a sectarian ideolgy?

    The Lebanese are not ready for real democracy and that is the ugly and harsh truth. Get a dectatore….fast

    1. Should that dictator be Moslem? Shia? Sunni? Durzi? Christian? Orthodox? Maronite? Syriac? Atheist? That dictatorship formula won’t work. Besides the ruling majority is pretty much a dictatorship now. Is that working? Will Hezbollah let them operate? Obviously no work is getting done because of that monopoly. Here is a suggestion that would work. Vote for a list and all the list should rule by rotating sectarian pretty much like Switzerland. Every year the offices are rotated amongst the list members. That way all sects get a chance at “ruling” to build the confidence needed before we transition to a full democratic non sectarian system.

      1. I like this suggestion, but I would still go for a dectatore for the first few years so he can filter the people and re evaluate the entire goverment BY FORCE if necessary. We have a lot of corruption of the mind, that can only be eradicated by force and fear….we need a butcher.

        The dectatore could be of any religion or sect, it is irrelevant, his main quality should be that he has the ablility to lead with a clear vision and wouldnt hesitate to use force against those who oppose his vision to establish a real state with a real independence and sovreignty

        1. kareemthehippy Avatar
          kareemthehippy

          JadM, you’re quite the Hobbesian. Should the dictator be aligned to any political party or destroy all the political parties? Wouldn’t the dictator also be a catalyst to the US invading Syria and/or Iran, therefore harming Lebanon in the process? Choices, choices, choices…I’d personally have Fairuz as an artistic dictator.

      2. I like this suggestion, but I would still go for a dectatore for the first few years so he can filter the people and re evaluate the entire goverment BY FORCE if necessary. We have a lot of corruption of the mind, that can only be eradicated by force and fear….we need a butcher.

        The dectatore could be of any religion or sect, it is irrelevant, his main quality should be that he has the ablility to lead with a clear vision and wouldnt hesitate to use force against those who oppose his vision to establish a real state with a real independence and sovreignty

      3. PROPHET.T Avatar

        My choice would be an atheist to the dictatorship. He can’t be worse than those who claim to be holly. He’s likely to have more mercy on the people .He won’t have to appease the religious leaders who have so much power over the politicians , and over the public. They use , and abuse their power everyday to ensure the continuation of their power.An atheist would annoy and scare the hell out of them to the point , where they might start dedicating their time for prayers , so God would get rid of the atheist. At lease they would be doing what they are supposed to.LOL

        1. funny lol

        2. PROPHET.T Avatar

          Now I know I ‘d get arrested at the airport, for this comment.

      4. PROPHET.T Avatar

        My choice would be an atheist to the dictatorship. He can’t be worse than those who claim to be holly. He’s likely to have more mercy on the people .He won’t have to appease the religious leaders who have so much power over the politicians , and over the public. They use , and abuse their power everyday to ensure the continuation of their power.An atheist would annoy and scare the hell out of them to the point , where they might start dedicating their time for prayers , so God would get rid of the atheist. At lease they would be doing what they are supposed to.LOL

        1. funny lol

        2. PROPHET.T Avatar

          Now I know I ‘d get arrested at the airport, for this comment.

  6. Lebanon is not ready for your ideas that are in theory correct and ideal…in fact too ideal that it scares everyone who is currently in power.

    There is one solution for Lebanon to become a real state…..it should be ruled by a dectatore through for few years , martial law should be enforced during te reign of this dectatore. In other words this dectatore’s main role would be to put new formulas that structures and form the new state…. who said democracy is what lebanon needs by the way….why does every damn analyst keeps on repeating that lebanon should be a democracy and lebanon should be ARABIC.

    Explain something, how willl you have a proper democracy in a country like lebanon that is divided socially, politically and demographically based on a sectarian ideolgy?

    The Lebanese are not ready for real democracy and that is the ugly and harsh truth. Get a dectatore….fast

  7. Lebanon is not ready for your ideas that are in theory correct and ideal…in fact too ideal that it scares everyone who is currently in power.

    There is one solution for Lebanon to become a real state…..it should be ruled by a dectatore through for few years , martial law should be enforced during te reign of this dectatore. In other words this dectatore’s main role would be to put new formulas that structures and form the new state…. who said democracy is what lebanon needs by the way….why does every damn analyst keeps on repeating that lebanon should be a democracy and lebanon should be ARABIC.

    Explain something, how willl you have a proper democracy in a country like lebanon that is divided socially, politically and demographically based on a sectarian ideolgy?

    The Lebanese are not ready for real democracy and that is the ugly and harsh truth. Get a dectatore….fast

    1. Should that dictator be Moslem? Shia? Sunni? Durzi? Christian? Orthodox? Maronite? Syriac? Atheist? That dictatorship formula won’t work. Besides the ruling majority is pretty much a dictatorship now. Is that working? Will Hezbollah let them operate? Obviously no work is getting done because of that monopoly. Here is a suggestion that would work. Vote for a list and all the list should rule by rotating sectarian pretty much like Switzerland. Every year the offices are rotated amongst the list members. That way all sects get a chance at “ruling” to build the confidence needed before we transition to a full democratic non sectarian system.

      1. I like this suggestion, but I would still go for a dectatore for the first few years so he can filter the people and re evaluate the entire goverment BY FORCE if necessary. We have a lot of corruption of the mind, that can only be eradicated by force and fear….we need a butcher.

        The dectatore could be of any religion or sect, it is irrelevant, his main quality should be that he has the ablility to lead with a clear vision and wouldnt hesitate to use force against those who oppose his vision to establish a real state with a real independence and sovreignty

        1.  Avatar

          JadM, you’re quite the Hobbesian. Should the dictator be aligned to any political party or destroy all the political parties? Wouldn’t the dictator also be a catalyst to the US invading Syria and/or Iran, therefore harming Lebanon in the process? Choices, choices, choices…I’d personally have Fairuz as an artistic dictator.

      2. I like this suggestion, but I would still go for a dectatore for the first few years so he can filter the people and re evaluate the entire goverment BY FORCE if necessary. We have a lot of corruption of the mind, that can only be eradicated by force and fear….we need a butcher.

        The dectatore could be of any religion or sect, it is irrelevant, his main quality should be that he has the ablility to lead with a clear vision and wouldnt hesitate to use force against those who oppose his vision to establish a real state with a real independence and sovreignty

      3. PROPHET.T Avatar

        My choice would be an atheist to the dictatorship. He/She can’t be worse than those who claim to be holly. He’s likely to have more mercy on the people .He won’t have to appease the religious leaders who have so much power over the politicians , and over the public. They use and abuse this power everyday to ensure the continuation of their power.An atheist would annoy and scare the hell out of them to the point , where they might start dedicating their time for prayers , so God would get rid of the atheist. At lease they would be doing what they are supposed to.LOL

        1. PROPHET.T Avatar

          Now I know I ‘d get arrested at the airport, just like what you think happened to poor Tony,lol

  8. We must continue to hope and to have dreams!One of the poet says that we must hold fast to dreams for life without dreams is like a frozen field where nothing grows!We all dream to have an ideal state where there is separation of religion and politics,where there is loyalty to the state only and not to groups that are struggling for power and after their own political interests at the expense of the welfare of the people!We dream to have states built on justice and equality for all,that have governments that act in accordance with the needs of their people ,protect their freedoms ,all freedoms,provide security and social needs.We must continue to dream a

    1. Ghassankaram Avatar
      Ghassankaram

      Fauzia,
      I am very conflicted when dreams are discussed. this might be a semantical divide but I do believe that one cannot base future visions on a pure dream only. We must have a plan of action otherwise dreams will be only that, dreams. As I have said before, no matter how hard I wish it pigs just don’t fly. Dreams must be anchored in reality to have the chance of making an impact. I am not certain that we are in disagreement but I feel that it must be made clear that our dreams are not simply utopian ideas but are made up of concepts that can be achieved.

  9.  Avatar

    We must continue to hope and to have dreams!One of the poet says that we must hold fast to dreams for life without dreams is like a frozen field where nothing grows!We all dream to have an ideal state where there is separation of religion and politics,where there is loyalty to the state only and not to groups that are struggling for power and after their own political interests at the expense of the welfare of the people!We dream to have states built on justice and equality for all,that have governments that act in accordance with the needs of their people ,protect their freedoms ,all freedoms,provide security and social needs.We must continue to dream a

    1.  Avatar

      Fauzia,
      I am very conflicted when dreams are discussed. this might be a semantical divide but I do believe that one cannot base future visions on a pure dream only. We must have a plan of action otherwise dreams will be only that, dreams. As I have said before, no matter how hard I wish it pigs just don’t fly. Dreams must be anchored in reality to have the chance of making an impact. I am not certain that we are in disagreement but I feel that it must be made clear that our dreams are not simply utopian ideas but are made up of concepts that can be achieved.

    2. Our dream only happens when all the bad apples get eradicated from LBN political system and replaced with such a vision; of all man created equally, no favoritism at all level for any group, religion, sect, believe, etc.,.

  10. ,,,,,and have a dream.I share my dream with all those who have a dream and may it come true one day for all !

  11.  Avatar

    ,,,,,and have a dream.I share my dream with all those who have a dream and may it come true one day for all !

  12. We can still achieve our dream, the establishment of a truly national, but in order to do so, we have no choice but to give it to religious leaders, their only role of the spirit. We have forged identities, not primarily our religious beliefs, but our definition of civil rights. We must shout from the roof of the emperor has no clothes.

  13. We can still achieve our dream, the establishment of a truly national, but in order to do so, we have no choice but to give it to religious leaders, their only role of the spirit. We have forged identities, not primarily our religious beliefs, but our definition of civil rights. We must shout from the roof of the emperor has no clothes.

Leave a Reply