U.N. Security Council condemned fighting in the buffer zone between Syria and Israel

Share:
A UN observer looks through binoculars at a lookout point as smoke rises from a Syrian side of the buffer zone
A UN observer looks through binoculars at a lookout point as smoke rises from a Syrian side of the buffer zone

The U.N. Security Council on Thursday strongly condemned fighting in the buffer zone between Syria and Israel and urged the Syrian government and opposition groups to withdraw from the area which is patrolled by U.N. peacekeepers.

A resolution sponsored by Russia and the United States and adopted unanimously Thursday by the U.N. Security Council extends the mandate of the peacekeeping mission known as UNDOF until Dec. 31.

Israel captured the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 Mideast war and subsequently annexed the strategic plateau overlooking northern Israel, but that annexation is not internationally recognized.

UNDOF has patrolled the buffer zone between Syria and Israel since 1974, a year after the 1973 Arab-Israeli war. For nearly four decades UNDOF helped enforce a stable truce between the two countries but the Syrian war spilled into the zone.

The six-year conflict has not only seen some intense fighting in the buffer zone but the abduction of peacekeepers by al-Qaida-linked anti-Syrian government militants, and other attacks that prompted several countries to withdraw their soldiers.

Israel has tried to stay out of the six-year civil war in Syria and refrained from taking sides, but has responded to spillover fire on numerous occasions. The Israeli military said Sunday it attacked a series of targets belonging to the Syrian military, after several projectiles from Syria landed in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights for a second day.

The resolution backed Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’ findings that ongoing military activities in the area of separation have the potential to escalate tensions and jeopardize the cease-fire between Israel and Syria, and pose risks to civilians and U.N. personnel on the ground.

According to the U.N. peacekeeping department, the UNDOF mission has 959 personnel including 828 military.

The resolution condemned the use of heavy weapons, including tanks, by both the Syrian armed forces and armed groups in the area of separation.

It underscored the need for UNDOF to have the sophisticated equipment and technology to effectively monitor the area of separation and cease-fire line including the capability to counter improvised explosive devices and “a sense and warn system, to ensure the safety and security of UNDOF personnel and equipment.”

The Security Council urged secretary-general Gutteres “to accelerate the development of proposals for such technologies.”

© 2017 The Associated Press.

Share:

Comments

160 responses to “U.N. Security Council condemned fighting in the buffer zone between Syria and Israel”

  1. good UN condemned not Israel now. HindBlabla, OmegaHell, Hannibal, learn not condemn Israel

    1. Hannibal Avatar
      Hannibal

      Wash your filthy sewer mouth with detergent and Clorox before mentioning my name zionazi.

      1. пнх идиот nazi is primitive you and your stupid name

        1. Hannibal Avatar
          Hannibal

          NaZion? Better?

          1. Please, Hannibal, i don’t want to see you are corrupted idiot. You can provide something interesting so your name also will be O.K., don’t be like OmegaHell or HindBlabla

  2. Niemals Avatar

    That was good news that the Security Council extends the mandate of the peacekeeping mission until Dec. 31.

    Who said that an resolution can’t be sponsored by Russia and the United States?
    The resolution was adopted unanimously by the U.N..

  3. Niemals Avatar

    The French politician, women’s rights champion and Holocaust survivor Simone Veil has died at the age of 89.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e7a165715ed7195c39850e6e61b53ebfe89be0b2f54747db7ad7b922813f22a5.jpg
    Simone Veil survived Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen
    Ms Veil was France’s minister of health from 1974-79, in which role she made access to contraception easier and fought a long battle to legalise abortion.
    The law which did so, passed in 1975, is known as “la loi Veil”.

    President Emmanuel Macron described her as “inspiring” and the best of France.

  4. Niemals Avatar

    RELIGION OF PEACE:
    Palestinian Nursery Teaches Children How to Prepare for Jihad to Kill Israelis
    http://vidmax.com/video/158618-RELIGION-OF-PEACE-Palestinian-Nursery-Teaches-Children-How-to-Prepare-for-Jihad-to-Kill-Israelis

    1. “According to the laws of Islam, if I feed him at least five times, he will be considered my son, that is, he will become a Jew” http://detaly.co.il/vseh-kto-obvinyaet-izrail-v-aparteide-ya-priglashayu-v-nashu-bolnitsu/

      1. Niemals Avatar
        Niemals

        Shocking, none of the anti-Israel (Anti Zionist) commentators reacted to this video.

        The following commentators; Hannibal, hateful idiot OmegaHell and Hindenburg changed the target of the hatred from the state of Israeli Zionists – The new target are you since you can read their hate vomiting – the rest of Israelis do not care – they are immune to such attacks.

  5. Hind Abyad Avatar
    Hind Abyad

    lal haramine
    No Partition of Eastern Syria; US welcomes Syria destroying Isis there, rules out land grab.

    http://theduran.com/no-partition-us-ok-syria-defeating-isis/

  6. Ignoring for a moment that the Golan Heights belongs to Syria and is internationally recognized as occupied territory by Israel, this is (another) provocation by the Anglo Empire (via its vassal state) to start, what appears to be, an imminent war (with its other vassal state, the US).

    1. Hind Abyad Avatar
      Hind Abyad

      US: No partition of Eastern Syria; US welcomes Syria destroying ISIS there. Rules out land grabs.
      http://theduran.com/no-partition-us-ok-syria-defeating-isis/

      1. Yet the US also stated they won’t withdraw after ISIS is defeated.

    2. Rudy1947 Avatar
      Rudy1947

      Syria has had 50 years to chat with Israel, yet not much interest. I don’t think the Syrians really care.

      1. You may like to yourself but a chat goes both ways.

        1. Rudy1947 Avatar
          Rudy1947

          The initial response from Syria to Israel was NO.

          1. Omega Avatar

            When was the “initial response” and in regards to what?

          2. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            You play the “dumb” role so well I’m beginning to think you are.

          3. Omega Avatar

            It was a honest question.

            Israel started it all in 1967 when it attacked surrounding countries to steal more lands. It then whined it was attacked.

            So, when did Syria say so “no” to Israel and regards to what exactly?

          4. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            A question that you have more knowledge of than the dumb question.

          5. Omega Avatar

            The mess started with Israel, not Syria. There were no subsequent attempts from Israel at resolving anything as they were/are perfectly happy with the outcome: the land grabbing of the Golan Heights.

            Yet, you said Syria said “no”.

          6. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Israel had no one to talk to, Syria said NO.

          7. Omega Avatar

            Did Israel talk to any one? (Hence my initial question to you.)

          8. Omega Avatar

            Edit: if Israel had no one to talk to, how could Syria have said “no” in response?

            In order for Syria to say “no”, Israel must have approached them. If so, when did it happen and in regards to what? (Hence my initial question.)

          9. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            No peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel and no negotiation with Israel.

          10. Omega Avatar

            That is quite different than your fist assertion.

          11. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            How many ways can you say NO.

          12. Omega Avatar

            You need to be clear.

            When you asserted that Syria said “no”, you insinuate that Israel attempted a dialogue – which Syria declined – when it never did.

            Had you initially said Syria has been at war with Israel since day one, I would not have asked you the first question.

          13. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            “insinuated”? Is that like it my be construed as or you suppose?

          14. Omega Avatar

            Why do you pinpoint on trivial typos when you have nothing to say?

          15. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            What typo? You said and spelled the word correctly, “insinuated”.

          16. Omega Avatar

            I did – late here.

            I didn’t and still don’t understand the latter part of your previous comment.

            My point is: you were not clear from the get-go and sounded like Israel attempted dialogue with Syria who declined.

          17. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            They did.

          18. Omega Avatar

            Are you purposely being vague?

            Who they, what did they do and when?

          19. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Syrians nothing, nothing more needs to said. The Syrians said NO.

          20. Omega Avatar

            “Syrians nothing” — What?

            “nothing more needs to said” — About what?

            “The Syrians said NO.” — You already said that. It remains the same: unclear.

          21. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            I’m sorry I confused you.

          22. Omega Avatar

            Believe you me, I am the one who’s confused.

          23. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            That’s what I said.

          24. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            You said nothing

          25. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            You have said nothing as in zilch, zero, nil.

          26. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Itchy?

          27. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            NO.

          28. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            You’re no Arabian League

          29. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Never said I was, but Syria was a member.

          30. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            blabla barbe à papa

          31. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Why you play his nono game?

          32. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            The Arab League did.

          33. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Recognise the gangster that took your house hah ha..!

          34. fake

          35. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Hope it’s the initial and the last with a bullshitter.

          36. Ilami-Gilaki Avatar
            Ilami-Gilaki

            Russia, China, India, the Philippines, North Korea and others successfully repelled/keep repelling Western hegemony.
            Iran and few South American countries somewhat successfully did the same.

            Arabs and Moslems totally failed! The mess, therefore, started with the Arabization of Western Asia and Northern Africa. Had WANA remained Christian, there would be no way in H that the US/Israel could manage to conquer this region.

          37. Omega Avatar

            Simply put: Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful. (Lucius Annaeus Seneca)

            Hence why the rulers have fomented, supported and exploited the worst of Islam in the Middle East in order to fulfill their geo-economical-political agenda. Had the Middle East discovered the oil before the White Man stepped in, I believe it would have been united, prosperous and peaceful.

            Religion is just the given pretext. Take the case of Iraq and Lybia (both were secular): both were on their way to become successful counties (Libya was actually the most successful in Africa) but were taken out when they threatened (and took measures) to drop the petro-dollar. England never liked competition and always made sure to eliminate it. Had Iraq and Lybia been Christian, the very same would have happened.

            You might argue that most of the countries you listed have repelled Western hegemony – and to some/most extend they might have – but all still have a Western Central Bank that is not nationalized (with the exception of North Korea). Libya did not have a Western Central Bank and that is the very first thing that was implemented after Qaddafi was ousted.

          38. Ilami-Gilaki Avatar
            Ilami-Gilaki

            I do agree that the British would have done the exact same thing if this region was Christian. All I’m saying is that Christians are patriotic. Shias are patriotic. Druze are patriotic. Sonnis are not. They are not even loyal to themselves considering what they do to one another and to the rest of us.
            The other day I found out that the Lebanese Christian Shakira had once said that she supports the people of the Middle East. The Coptic Patriarch supports the people of the Middle East. The lebanese christian model Miryam Klink supports Hezbollah and even supported the iranian team during the last world cup.

            Now show me one instance where the Sunnis came out to support any non-Sunni of Middle east?

          39. Omega Avatar

            Where do you read me say otherwise?

          40. Ilami-Gilaki Avatar
            Ilami-Gilaki

            you support for the sunnis is the “otherwise”.

          41. Omega Avatar

            Shedding accuracy on the Palestinian case is not supporting the Sunnis as Christians were involved too.

          42. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Reptilian nonsense..huh..huh..

          43. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Actually s2pid I was telling Omega he had more knowledge. Obviously that went over your head.

          44. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Did you? Wow..

          45. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Gee, I got a wow out of you. Glory be me lass.

          46. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            velcome

          47. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Bullsch’i=lt

          48. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Do you have anything to add other than immaterial cartoons and your waste products?

          49. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Double bull..

          50. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            I’ll take that as a no.

          51. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Take it as you please

          52. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Tom and Jerry

          53. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Always preferred Foghorn and Bugs Bunny:

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Qtgm5g5Gyo

          54. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Guest Matrix parasite admiration is your glory.

          55. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Still worried about Matrix. Poor child.

          56. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Not worried about nuts, worried about your cute IQ.

          57. Niemals Avatar
            Niemals

            Hindenburg Got Matrix Under her Skin, poor baby still haunted by “Matrix”.

          58. Can’t stop laughing, HebBlabla Hind Abyad now again

          59. Niemals Avatar
            Niemals

            She is worried about Matrix for some unclear reason….

      2. Niemals Avatar
        Niemals

        Idiotic, “Syria has had 50 years to chat with Israel”.
        There is a state of war between Syria and Israel, and so it has been the last five decades.

        You can negotiate with the opponent only if you have the power, Syria (Al-Assad) can hardly control his own country.

        Al-Assad has no control over the country, Golan is annexed by Israel and many parts of Syria are ruled by different ‘religious’ bandits.
        You are probably right that “the Syrians really care.”

        When the ‘occupation’ of Syria is over and the Assad clan is still in power, it remains to see if there will be a change in the state of war between Syria and Israel.

        1. Rudy1947 Avatar
          Rudy1947

          We’re talking of the last fifty years, not just the last five or so.

          1. Niemals Avatar
            Niemals

            “There is a state of war between Syria and Israel, and so it has been the last five decades.”.

          2. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            “Al-Assad has no control over the country”

            “When the ‘occupation’ of Syria is over and the Assad clan is still in power”.

            The last five years or so. The other 45 years produced nothing concerning the Golan Heights.

        2. Hind Abyad Avatar
          Hind Abyad

          Guest Matrix gives himself a like..

          1. Hind Abyad fake as usual. i’m upvoted Niemals

    3. Golan now belongs to Israel, Hatay now belongs to Turkey. You can continue masturbate

      1. Omega Avatar

        It doesn’t belong to Israel. It’s internationally recognized as Syrian territory occupied by IsraHell.

        1. Cry river, hateful idiot OmegaHell, peaceful now Golan, home also for Druzes, lost in war, is Israel, masturbate how you want also internationally, idiot

          1. Omega Avatar

            I know that you thugs don’t care much about the law but acquisition of land by war is illegal since WW2.

          2. Orabian, also syrian wars against jews are legal, idiot?

          3. Omega Avatar

            What war? Israel attacked surrounding countries to steal more lands and then whined it was attacked.

            This is old news and acknowledged by both Israel and the West.

          4. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Israel won them though. Now the Arabs have been whining for 7 decades.

          5. Omega Avatar

            Won how? It attacked, stole lands and then lied it was attacked.

          6. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            How?? Brilliant military strategy and guts.

          7. Omega Avatar

            Hahaha!!! You thug, you.

            More like lies, cheat, savagery and an aweful lot of whining – the attributes of the cabbage munching Chabad-Lubavitch vermin you love so much.

          8. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Arabs got their hind quarters whooped, several times. Israel made good decisions militarily and politically, the Arabs didn’t. So irregardless of the diet the Arab policies and decisions didn’t work, failed.

          9. Omega Avatar

            In 1948, the Zionists attacked an unarmed population (Christian and Muslim Palestinians). In 1967, Israel attacked surrounding countries to steal more lands. In early 1970s, Israel shelled the south of Lebanon continuously. From 1982 to 2000, they tried to repeat their modus operandi in stealing up to the Litani River but went back to the land they had previously stolen from another people with their not-so-kosher tail between their legs (thanks to Hezbollah).

            Go ahead and support thugs who have a proven history of terrorism, violence, theft, oppression, whining, lies, cheat and deceit but drop your non-sense that they won anything within the frame of legality and morality.

          10. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Unarmed population….ROFL
            Surrounded by Arab armies and Navies…..brilliant pre-emptive strike.
            Attack by Syrian, Egyptian and Jordan armies…..close, but Israel prevailed
            Countless Palestinian attacks and Israel prevailed.
            The Hizzbillies got a bath…..many were pleased.

            The Arabs have failed militarily….continually……and many Arab countries have gone on about their business until fighting among themselves.

          11. Omega Avatar

            Yes, unarmed. The population the Zionists attacked in the last months of the Bitrish Mandate in 1948 was unarmed – Christian and Muslim Palestinians. Their towns and villages were attacked/seized and upwards of 800,000 civilians were displaced after a killing rampage. The savage Zionists had made 80% of their illegal territory gain before any Arab country was put on alert. The Arab countries did not enter Israel but Palestine to restore peace after the Palestinians had begged them for months. The King of Jordan who had initially planned on conquering the land to share it with Israel decided otherwise after the news of Deir Yassin leaked out.

            Referring to Hezbollah as “Hizzbillies” when the Hilly Billy come from your neck of the wood (you are likely one) is paradoxically silly. Either way, bath you say. Israeli military officials admitted to a humiliating defeat. (I’ll look up the references, not handy at the moment.)

            Sure, keep blaming the “Arabs” without factoring in the nefarious and catalyst input England has had in the region with its two vassal states (Israel and the USA). Your country’s survival is reduced to waging illegal wars on others. Sad, lame ducks.

          12. пнх idiot OmehaHell

          13. Ilami-Gilaki Avatar
            Ilami-Gilaki

            But Arabs are to be blamed. The non-Arab and Christian George Habash was the first one to fight for his land that the alien Arabs had sold to the Jooz.

          14. Omega Avatar

            You take a flawed angle (Habash) and exploit it wrongly ad nauseam. Lands were indeed sold but they represented a tiny fraction of the overall territory.

            You blame the “alien Arabs” (known as Palestinians) but fail to mention that they have inhabited the land for thousands of years, that they descend from the ancient people of the land, that they legally owned 95%+ of the land by 1945, etc.

            The only “alien” to the land are the so-called “Jews” from Europe, Eastern Europe and ROW who had not heard of the word “Palestine/Israel” they were told so.

            Some historical facts:

            – The non-Jewish Palestinians fought along side England to repel the Ottomans from the land (for the promise of an independent land) while the Jews/Zionists did so along side the Central Power against England.

            – In 1937, after rejecting the Peel Commission land sharing proposal (a small part for the Jews and the rest for the non-Jews), the Zionists went on a decade-long terror campaign. It was so bad the British army could not contain it.

            – In 1948, the same Zionists went on another rampage in the last months of the British Mandate, stealing 60% of what was given to the non-Jews by the UN Partition.

            Who’s to blame again?

          15. selected “historical” “facts” convenient for OmegaHell to blame Israel again and again

          16. Omega Avatar

            Selected how exactly? The Jews/Zionists fought along the Central Power, did go on a decade-long terror campaign and did steal over half of the Palestinian partition.

          17. Please, refresh your brain, Palestina is East Shore (Bank?) of Mediterranean Sea, from Sinai to Hatay and even North of Saudian Orabian peninsula is also Palestina. Please try to find Mount Sinai, you can find it also in Sinai, also in Israel, also in NW Saudia

          18. Ilami-Gilaki Avatar
            Ilami-Gilaki

            anyone who doesn’t serve the interests of the middle east is alien hence most sunnis are aliens.

          19. Omega Avatar

            What does this have to do with Sunnis? The Zionists killed, raped and displaced Christians in Palestine alike. Besides, how do they (Jews/Zionists/Israelis) serve the interests of the ME? They keep stealing more lands, foment conflicts/wars and have the US bomb the hell of of it. Quit trolling.

          20. Ilami-Gilaki Avatar
            Ilami-Gilaki

            don’t be surprised when the sonnis start yet another civil war in lebanon.

          21. Omega Avatar

            We know who was behind the bombings of the north and south. It won’t happen. Nobody in Lebanon want another civil war.

          22. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Your dear Palestinians were definitely armed and used those arms whenever they could. When that was not enough several nations joined the battles to include volunteers from even more Arab nations. Those Palestinians who did not fight got out of the way with the hopes of an Arab victory which did not happen. BTW, the Dear Hassan battle took place, but it was not a massacre.

            As long as you and others editorialize the name Israel or Zionists, I will continue to editorialize Hezbollah.

            I will blame the Arabs and will treat them as a group that are capable of making their own decisions…….not sugar coated with other nations.

          23. Omega Avatar

            They are not “my dear”, I am only interested in historical accuracy, not the mainstream/imposed narrative that always portrays the victors as righteous and the victims as otherwise.

            The five Arab armies who entered Palestine (not Israel) on May 15th, 1948 were obviously armed but the Christian and Muslim Palestinian population attacked in the last few months of the British mandate was not. Worth nothing that Ben Gurion stated in his memoir that until the Brits left, no Arab stepped foot in any Jewish settlements.

            I take it you meant Deir Yassin and not Hassan. If so, I don’t know why you keep on insisting that it was a battle and not a massacre of civilians when the Zionists of the time described it as a massacre. I can quote them, again, if you want.

            I didn’t suggest you don’t editorialize Hezbollah. It’s the American reference as Hilly Billy that’s silly.

            Regrouping “Arabs” as one group is abysmal ignorance. Ignoring England and its two vassal states’ negative influence in the region, even more so.

          24. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Prior to May 15th the Arabs already had at 2 militias involved in the fighting so the idea of the unarmed population is bogus.

            Yes I meant Deir Yassan and the reporters of the day confessed in a BBC video that the “massacre” did not happen and also backfired. Instead of the story creating recruits, it created hysteria and fleeing.

            Hizzbilly works just fine for me and I will continue to use the term.

          25. Omega Avatar

            Involved in what fighting? The Zionists waged a decade-long terror campaign (from 1937) on the Palestinians and the Brits in Palestine. There were obviously some resistance coming from the Palestinians.

            Deir Yassin, not Yassan was a planned attack/massacre. You keep on using the BBC video as your sole argument when everything in history shows otherwise:

            The most symbolic incident for Arab Palestinians has been, for many years, the conquest and massacre in the village of Deir Yassin, near Jerusalem, by forces of the Revisionist Etzel (IRGUN) and Lehi {Lochamei Herut Yisrael or “Stern Gang”} groups, on April 9, 1948. At the time, the Jewish leadership did not deny that there had been a massacre, by forces not under its control, and in fact apologized to King Abdullah of Jordan.

            http://www.israel-palestina.info/deir-yassin-the-evidence/

          26. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            That BBC video was with one of the reporters who created the hoax, that does make the video significant.

            You can whine about Irgun, Lehi, Stern Gang forever. The final outcome was they were successful.

          27. Omega Avatar

            How was it a hoax when the parties involved (Irgun, Lehi, etc) admitted to the massacre?

            The outcome is not the topic on hand.

          28. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Admit to the attack, not a massacre. The Arab press created the massacre.

          29. Omega Avatar

            The Jewish Leadership did not deny the massacre and apologized for it. Irgun/Lehi militants admitted to a massacre but according to you, it’s the Arab Press that “invented” the massacre.

            Did the Arab Press also invent the attack and seizing of Palestinian towns and villages that resulted in the theft of 60% of the Palestinian partition, the killing of unarmed civilians and the displacement of upwards of 800,000 Palestinians?

            When you regurgitate/parrot the mainstream narrative (based on lies and distortions), you will be contradicted with historical facts and records. It’s only when you get real and decide to be truthful (that the Zionists committed all sorts of savage crimes in order to make Israel a reality) that you can’t be contradicted.

          30. Idiot, Kingdom Jordan is 60% (70%?) of the Falestinian partition, stop masturbate on jews

          31. Omega Avatar

            I recommend you get your facts in order about the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the Emirate of Transjordan and ancient/old Palestine.

          32. Omega Avatar

            I am aware of the 1920 British Mandate of Palestine map, what is your point? Do you ever make one?

          33. My point it is good thing everyone can live where he/she want. Israel (its creation and existing is miracle, not by “Stalin” but even may be due to Ukrainian ambassador in UN) Israel is a small country-refugee camp, Noah Arc for jews first of all but not only, my wife and so my child are not jews but living here. Can you explain me, why Orabians can live everywhere (also sorry in concentration? orabian? refugee camps) and Jews in “international” opinion can not live in Judea or close to Orabians? Also may be you are intentionally missing point: 21% of Israeli population are equal and respectful Orabians. I’m sure will be peace between Kurdistan , Lebanon and Israel. Syria will not exist as before i think, failed (lol French mandate)

          34. Omega Avatar

            You passed from Jordan to the British Mandate of Palestine to this raving. Like I said, you have no point. All you do is ramble. You claiming to be married with a child takes your nonsense to a whole other level – unless your wife is your sister that is. Something coming among you guys I hear.

            Had the Zionists respected the 1948 UN Partition and waited for the end of the British Mandate in Palestine, there would be no problem today.

          35. هل تفهم اللغة العربية بشكل أفضل؟
            وأعتقد أن لديك مشكلة مع فهم

          36. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Until such time as the reporters confessed to hoax, there was no other version of the story. However, the battles continued and the new nation of Israel born.

          37. Omega Avatar

            At some point in time, scientists also thought the Earth was flat.

            You cherry pick the version of the Deir Yassin incident you like best and insist it’s the only one that is true – despite historical facts and records slicing that version like fresh bread.

          38. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Then the scientists found out they were wrong. Now, like the scientists, the Deir Yassin massacre was just another battle and not a hoax

          39. Omega Avatar

            So is the BBC video wrong now. Historical facts and records confirm it was the massacre of Palestinian civilians by the Zionists.

            You’re a prime example of “You can’t fix stupid.”

          40. Rudy1947 Avatar
            Rudy1947

            Only you could derive that. Totally inane and childish.

          41. Omega Avatar

            Let’s see …

            Your argument: some guy said to the BBC that he was present at the Deir Yassin incident and that there was no massacre.

            Counter-argument: the Jewish Leadership admitted to the massacre and apologized for it. Irgun/Lehi militants admitted to a massacre.

            And I am the inane.

          42. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            vsvsvsvsvsvssvsvsvsvsvsvsvsvsvsy a rien là..

          43. Êtes-vous quelque chose?

          44. Hannibal Avatar
            Hannibal

            There is an idiot in vs

          45. пнх corrupted idiots are Hannibal, OmegaHell and HindBlabla

          46. Hannibal Avatar
            Hannibal

            irked you much? I told you to stop insulting people. ARGUE THE POINT and STOP the personal attacks or I will ban you. We tolerated your kiddish behavior ENOUGH!

          47. Only you allowed to insult? If you will not be corrupted idiot, i will be glad not call you such. I told you idiot is not insult and you are calling me idiot. Please do not threaten me and please, you can better ignore me, i can not see fruitful conversation with like you, OmegaHell, HindBlablah

          48. Hannibal Avatar
            Hannibal

            vs useful conversation: either you agree with me or you’re an idiot… Speaking of an information zionazi.

          49. please, Hannibal, can you ignore me? may be it will be big loss for me, but i will tolerate this loss still hoping you can provide something fruitful

          50. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Block everybody who don’t agree with you and shut up!

          51. i’m never blocking someone. Don’t agree is not point, anyone has own points. You, fool, posting crap most of all so you can safely just shut up without loss for someone, interesting for someone. But we can just ignore anyone. Thank you are not ignoring me and sorry you are masturbating on me not providing something fruitful

          52. Niemals Avatar
            Niemals

            Hannibal is “WE”…. LOL

          53. looks like Hannibal is infofascist

          54. Niemals Avatar
            Niemals

            I bet that this twitter “Hannibal” Trump is frequent reader of the southfront.org as his soul buddy’s, Omega and Hindenburg.
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1bdf79aed29842490436206bfea2f0e8a02883a044b46541e6cc366c15af4385.jpg
            Notice the language used by the commentators in New York Times and AP Finally Retract False Claims on Russia Hacking “NY Times is owned by Jews.”, NOT Zionists….

          55. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            Notice your idiocy Matrix: Many Jews are Zionists…;-)

            ‘Six Jewish Compagnies control 96% of the World’s Media’
            http://tapnewswire.com/2015/10/six-jewish-companies-control-96-of-the-worlds-media/

          56. Hannibal Avatar
            Hannibal

            Haven’t you noticed I do not respond to your bull crap Kraut? But honestly I am not addressing you so mind your own business and stop putting your LONG NOSE into the affairs of others. One more thing:
            Wash your sewer mouth with detergent before uttering my name.

          57. Please, Hannibal, i don’t want sure insult you, i’m just warning you to be O.K. May be you need visit doctor? Are you chief here? Emperor? Please don’t scream and don’t be dirty yourself, i already warned you

          58. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            idiot-retard vice-versa, stupid comments…..;-))

          59. not for you level, fool. please block me or yourself already

          60. Hind Abyad Avatar
            Hind Abyad

            You know what to do fool

          61. Omega Avatar

            Wrong. There is multiple.

          62. Thank you OmegaHell you are not so dirty like Hannibal, but you are both fake and corrupted with also fool Hind. Your abuse is not big problem for me but your own characteristic

          63. liberal fundamentalism waste

          64. Niemals Avatar
            Niemals

            Kannibal expecting that the Ken O’Keefe will do HIS job?
            Kenneth Nichols O’Keefe (What Strange Blend) Is An American-Irish-Palestinian Citizen.
            Furthermore he is holding a Hawaiian citizenship.

            O’Keefe tried to formally refrain from his US citizenship, not the Irish(?)

            PressTV contribution (The debate on press TV. 28 August 2013.);
            https://youtu.be/KmQw6CryE9M

          65. Omega Avatar

            Read my comment again.

      2. Niemals Avatar
        Niemals

        The Golan is annexed by Israel, and the syrian don’t do any negotiations (or military action) to get it back as the Egyptian did with the Sinai peninsula.

        Is it omega crying about the loss?
        Didn’t know he was Syrian…

        1. Omega Avatar

          as the Egyptian did with the Sinai peninsula.

          What negotiation? Israel did not want to return what it stole. The US forced them too.

      3. Niemals Avatar
        Niemals

        Post scriptum;
        There state of war between Egypt and Israel, have been transformed to diplomatic relation between the to countrys, despite the resistance from Muslim Brotherhood.
        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0e7626dd25d994e067f4e4f366180b7048aed1b415ca0e414fb9e4417e6bfdff.jpg
        Israelische Botschaft in Kairo

        If you ask my, I don’t believe in any suche transformation, when it comes to Syria.

  7. 03.07 The command of the Syrian Armed Forces announced the suspension of military operations in southern Syria, including the Kuneitra region, on the border with Israel. The regime of “silence” will remain in force until Thursday, July 6

Leave a Reply