Russia vowed to veto sanctions against Syrian regime over use of chemical weapons

Share:

un security council meeting gazaRussia vowed Friday to use its veto to block a proposed UN resolution drafted by the United States, France and Britain that would impose sanctions on the Syrian regime  for the use of chemical weapons.

The trio are pushing for a vote early next week on the measure that would slap sanctions on 11 Syrians and 10 entities linked to chemical attacks in the nearly six-year war.

“I just explained our position very clearly to our partners. If it is tabled, we will veto it,” Russian Deputy Ambassador Vladimir Safronkov told reporters following a closed-door meeting of the Security Council.

Safronkov rejected the measure as “one-sided,” saying it was based on “insufficient proof” and contradicted “the fundamental principle of presumption of innocence until the investigation is over.”

Russia has used its veto six times to shield its Damascus ally from any punitive action by the Security Council.

The draft resolution follows a UN-led investigation which concluded in October that the Syrian military had carried out at least three chlorine attacks on opposition-held villages in 2014 and 2015.

The joint panel of the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) also found that Islamic State jihadists had used mustard gas in an attack in 2015.

US Ambassador Nikki Haley said she was not swayed by the Russian arguments.

“How much longer is Russia going to continue to babysit and make excuses for the Syrian regime?” she said.

“People have died by being suffocated to death. That’s barbaric.”

“You are either for chemical weapons or you are against it,” she added.

The fresh clash with Russia came as a new round of peace talks in Geneva struggled to get off the ground, with Syrian government and opposition delegations haggling over the format of meetings.

– US rejoins France, Britain –

The vote expected Monday or Tuesday would mark the first major council action by the new US administration of President Donald Trump, who took office on January 20 seeking warmer ties with Russia.

Britain and France had circulated the draft text weeks ago, but held off on action to give the Trump administration time to study it.

The vote would see the Trump administration joining old allies France and Britain to confront Russia over its support for the Syrian regime .

“We now have clear evidence that chemical weapons have been used in Syria against civilian populations and converging indications that such weapons continue to be used in this country,” said French Ambassador Francois Delattre.

“On the scale of threats to peace and security, we are at 10 here,” he said.

British Deputy Ambassador Peter Wilson added: “We absolutely intend to move forward with this resolution in the coming days.”

The draft text, seen by AFP, would impose a global travel ban and assets freeze on 11 Syrians, mostly military officials, and 10 entities linked to chemical weapons development.

It would also ban the sale, supply or transfer of helicopters and related materiel, including spare parts, to the Syrian armed forces or the government.

The UN-OPCW panel found that Syrian air force helicopters dropped chlorine barrel-bombs on the villages of Qmenas, Talmenes and Sarmin in 2014 and 2015.

Chlorine use as a weapon is banned under the Chemical Weapons Convention, which Syria joined in 2013 under pressure from Russia.

The Syrian government has repeatedly denied using chemical weapons in the war that has killed 310,000 people since March 2011.

YAHOO

Share:

Comments

8 responses to “Russia vowed to veto sanctions against Syrian regime over use of chemical weapons”

  1. Syria better be ready to add cabbage to their falafel.

    1. and Yankees better be ready to add shit to their burgers.. open wide

  2. the chem weapons was a lie in 2011.. they’re pulling it again lol? dumb fooks… Russia will show u bitches.

    1. Fri Oct 11, 2013 ‘Syrian rebels killed 190 civilians in August dawn raid: HRW’
      http://www.reuters.com/article/us-syria-crisis-killings-idUSBRE99A03520131011

  3. OCTOBER 10, 2013

    “You Can Still See Their Blood”

    Executions, Indiscriminate Shootings, and Hostage Taking by Opposition Forces in Latakia Countryside

    https://www.hrw.org/report/2013/10/10/you-can-still-see-their-blood/executions-indiscriminate-shootings-and-hostage

    1. liberal fundamentalism
      HRW https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2011/03/24/6336-zaschita-prav-lyudoeda-ili-liberalnyy-fundamentalizm

      (GT) Francis of Assisi made a vow eternal poverty and preached to the birds. But under his successor Franciscan Order became one of the richest and not disinterested institutions in Europe. On the human rights movement by the end of the XX century was the same as with the Franciscan order.

      The
      oldest and well-known human rights organization, Human Rights Watchs,
      was created by Robert Bernstein in 1978, to ensure that both the USSR
      performs Helsinki Accords. But in 1992 the Soviet Union collapsed, and HRW is still alive. Moreover, it only increased; a budget of tens of millions of dollars, has offices in 90 countries.

      A 19 October 2009 there was a huge scandal: the octogenarian founder
      of HRW spoke to The New York Times article, which HRW blamed of
      betraying the principles and consistent support of Hamas and
      “Hezbollah”, under constantly biased and unfair attitude towards Israel.

      Two reception that HRW uses constant criticism of Israel, are very simple. First – this is a departure from the study of the causes of the conflict. “We do not study the causes of the conflict – said the HRW – we learn how parties to a conflict respect human rights.”

      Great! Imagine that you – a woman, which was attacked by a maniac in the woods, and you were able to shoot him. From the point of view of human rights defenders from HRW, and you’re to blame.

      The position of “we do not study the cause of” deliberately puts
      terrorist aggressor, have fewer resources, in an advantageous position
      in comparison with the state, which responds to terror.

      The second method is even simpler – a distortion, omission and lies. Thus,
      in the 2007 report, HRW said that “Hezbollah” no habit “to use the
      population as human shields,” and at the same time stated that it has
      evidence that the Israeli army “did deliberately targeted the civilian
      population.” When
      in 2002 an epidemic of Falestinian suicide bombings peaked, HRW
      published a press release on the Israeli human rights violations. HRW took another 5 months to release a report on suicide bombers, and 5
      years to release a report on the Israeli shelling from Gaza.

      In 2009, HRW went to Saudi Orabia, where he collected money for anti-Israeli statements. The matter of human rights in Saudi Orabia is somewhat worse than in Israel. In addition, Saudi Orabia is the largest state sponsor of terrorism. But HRW is not confused.

      This
      same position is occupied by HRW in Sri Lanka, where government forces
      are fighting against the “Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam” brutal
      terrorist organization that killed tens of thousands of people and using
      the Tamils ​​as human shields. Any attempt to attack government troops immediately HRW claims that government forces inflict strikes on civilians

Leave a Reply