French journalist went undercover with ISIS cell

Share:

A French Islamic State cell dismantled in the final stages of planning an attack has yielded a new secret in the first week of May 2016, with the release of undercover footage showing how a group of disaffected petty criminals transformed into a terror network. (AP Photo/Kamil Zihnioglu, File) THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
A French Islamic State cell dismantled in the final stages of planning an attack has yielded a new secret in the first week of May 2016, with the release of undercover footage showing how a group of disaffected petty criminals transformed into a terror network. (AP Photo/Kamil Zihnioglu, File) THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
A French Islamic State cell dismantled in the final stages of planning an attack has yielded a new secret this week, with the release of undercover footage showing how a group of disaffected petty criminals transformed into a terror network.

Filmed by a young French Muslim journalist who infiltrated the group with a hidden camera, the Canal Plus documentary takes an extraordinary inside look at the group, which called itself the Soldiers of Allah. The cell was nominally led by a young ex-convict who called himself Abu Oussama, who speaks dreamily about his coming death, the palace that awaits him in paradise, the winged horse made of gold and rubies, and the women: “I’m not making this up, I swear,” he breathes.

“I got the feeling they’re beyond saving. The programming is so well done, if you will, that you can only be their enemy. There is no discussing with them,” according to the journalist, who took the pseudonym Said Ramzy in the credits and was known to the jihadis as Abu Hamza.

Ramzy told The Associated Press the cell was actually directed by a Frenchman sent home from Syria by the extremist organization to plot an attack. Ramzy was considered valuable because, unlike the other members of the cell, he had no criminal past and had never been identified as a radical.

Abu Oussama had been flagged to police by his father, detained in Turkey trying to reach Syria, and imprisoned in France for five months until authorities determined he was no longer a danger, he tells Ramzy.

“They said since I was deradicalized, since I was quiet …” he says, giggling toward the camera he cannot see. “It’s all part of the ruse, brother.”

Oussama appears to trust Ramzy, but not all of the cell’s nine members had the same faith. One, who went by the name Joseph, warns Ramzy once that he’s been found out, without ever explaining. The others ignore the warning, apparently even after all but Ramzy and the Islamic State fighter sent from Syria were rounded up.

“It’s just you and me,” the man writes in a message to Ramzy as he prepares to hand over a second set of instructions via a mysterious veiled woman who meets the journalist at a school to deliver the envelope.

Islamic State carefully controls its public image via a sophisticated propaganda apparatus and, in at least one case, allowing a crew to film its members in Syria under specifically vetted conditions. A second journalist involved in the documentary, who went by the name Marc Armone, said he and Ramzy wanted to get past an edited version of Islamic State and into the minds of its European recruits.

They went first to French mosques that adhere to the austere Salafi strain of Islam, which many in the French government have linked directly to Islamic State’s claim of religious purity. But there, Ramzy was warned to be on guard against the extremist recruiters – and he later discovered an entire genre of Islamic State propaganda that derides French Salafists.

“They are fundamentalists but they are also opposed to taking political power,” Armone said. For the jihadis, “it’s the Islam of the Internet, of McDonalds and Subway. There are a handful of mosques they go to, but really just a handful.”

The main recruiting grounds are the Internet – specifically the encrypted app Telegram – and prison. And, the film says, this is where the French system seems least equipped to handle them.

The police intelligence unit that searches for jihadi recruitment materials has no Arabic speakers, relying instead on Internet translation programs. The prisons are equally strapped for resources, according to the filmmakers.

Ramzy is drawn into the jihadi web via a Facebook page that turns out to be managed from inside a French prison, by an inmate who goes so far as to send his bank transfer information for donations.

The story accelerates after the Nov. 13 attacks in Paris that left 130 people dead and the city reeling from shock. One of the cell is put under house arrest during the state of emergency, and the others frantically and somewhat ineptly try to obtain a working Kalashnikov and explosives to carry out an attack on a night club ordered by Souleymane, the Frenchman sent by Islamic State from Syria.

By then, Armone said, France’s intelligence services both knew about the cell and knew that a journalist had infiltrated. Ramzy was never arrested, and he cuts off contact when the suspicious cell member sends him a final message after the December sweeps dismantled the group: “You’re finished.”

Ramzy said he was nervous but reminded himself throughout the six-month process of the activists in Raqqa who continue to risk their lives to film life under Islamic State rule. And, he added, the members of the cell “aren’t terribly clever.”

“That makes sense, because to think you’re going to paradise for killing innocent people, you have to be especially stupid,” he added. “And that may yet be what saves us.”

France24/(AP)

Share:

Comments

3 responses to “French journalist went undercover with ISIS cell”

  1. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    Reminds us of the woman who ‘infiltrated’ with the hidden cam, and then had to find a way to extricate herself … and those who seek the truth give up a normal life after filing the reports. Some writers of books had to do the same. Rushdi didn’t use a pseudonym.

  2. SparklingMoon, Avatar
    SparklingMoon,

    Those who possess sight, read the ahadith and ponder over the Holy Qur’an should understand well that the kind of activities practiced by many of today’s barbaric people is not Islamic. Rather, these misguided activities that have spread amongst the Muslims are instigated by nafse-‘ammarah [self that incites to evil] or by a crude desire for Paradise.

    It is a remarkable coincidence that Christians erred with respect to the rights of God, while Muslims erred with respect to the rights of human beings. That is, the Christian faith raised a humble man to Godhood, thereby compromising the obligations due to the All-Powerful, AllSustaining Being Who has no equal in heaven or earth. But Muslims violated human rights by unjustly raising the sword and calling it jihad. In short, Christians adopted one path of violating rights, and Muslims adopted the other. Unfortunately for this era, both of these groups consider their own transgressions to be desirable. Each therefore emphasizes its own doctrine, certain that this alone is the straight path and best way to Paradise.

    Today’s Islamic scholars completely misunderstand jihad and misrepresent it to the general public. The public’s violent instincts are inflamed as a result and they are stripped of all noble human virtues. Muslim clergies who persist in propagating these blood-spattered doctrines are in fact responsible for murders committed by ignorant, egotistical people. They should remember that their understanding of jihad is not at all correct, and that human sympathy is its first casualty. Although ignorant Muslim clergies have instructed the ordinary public in plunder and killing by calling these actions jihad, Christian clerics have also done something similar. They have produced thousands of publications, journals and flyers alleging that Islam was spread by the sword. This literature, which has been distributed by wrongly claims that Islam is synonymous with violence. The people’s penchant for violence has increased as a result of the combined testimony of the Muslim and Christian clerics.

    Islam excels all other faiths in the demonstration it provides of patience, rejecting evil and noble conduct.It would be foolish, unfortunate and wrong for Muslims to abandon this example. May God bring these ignorant maulavis back to the right path.They have misled the populace into believing that the keys to Paradise lie in beliefs that are oppressive, cruel and completely immoral.Can it be a good deed to shoot a complete stranger, intending to kill him while he is absorbed in thought? Is this religiousness? If these are acts of any virtue then animals are more virtuous than human beings.

    Governments should gather the great scholars of religion and convene a discussion on the true nature of jihad. These religious scholars can then educate the public about its errors.In fact, the religious scholars of different countries should compile pamphlets in local languages and make them available to the general public. This type of activity will have a tremendous influence on people. The passions instilled by the ignorant maulavis will gradually subside. They should remember that their understanding of jihad is not at all correct, and that human sympathy is its first casualty. Their belief, that jihad should be lawful today because it was permitted in early Islam, is totally incorrect. (Ruhanikhazain)

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      Say THAT in the wrong place, Dear Sparkle, and you must be prepared to turn the other side of the neck.

Leave a Reply