Saudi king snubbing Obama over policies on Iran

Share:
President Barack Obama visited Riyadh in January to express condolences to Saudi Arabian King Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud on the king’s father’s death.
President Barack Obama visited Riyadh in January to express condolences to Saudi Arabian King Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud on the king’s father’s death.

Saudi Arabia announced Sunday that its new monarch will not attend meetings at the White House with President Barack Obama or a summit at Camp David this week, in an apparent signal of its continued displeasure over U.S. relations with Iran.

As recently as Friday, the administration said King Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud would be coming to “resume consultations on a wide range of regional and bilateral issues,” according to Eric Schultz, a White House spokesman.

But on Sunday, the state-run Saudi Press Agency said the king would instead send Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, the Saudi interior minister. The agency said the summit meeting would overlap with a five-day cease-fire in Yemen that is scheduled to start Tuesday to allow for the delivery of humanitarian aid.

Arab officials said they viewed the king’s failure to attend the meeting as a sign of disappointment with what the administration was willing to give as reassurance that the U.S. would back its Arab allies against a rising Iran.

A senior administration official said White House officials did not believe that Salman’s absence was because of any disagreement.

“We look forward to the attendance of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, with whom the president has met on several occasions, including in the Oval Office in December 2014 and January 2013, as well as Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who the president met when he traveled to Riyadh in January,” a White House official said.

Jon Alterman, senior vice president with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said Salman’s absence is both a blessing and a snub.

“It holds within it a hidden opportunity,” he said, “because senior U.S. officials will have an unusual opportunity to take the measure of Mohammed bin Salman, the very young Saudi defense minister and deputy crown prince, with whom few have any experience.”

But he added it “sends an unmistakable signal when a close partner essentially says he has better things to do than go to Camp David with the president, just a few days after the White House announced he’d have a private meeting before everything got underway.”

Secretary of State John Kerry met Friday in Paris with his counterparts from the Arab nations that were invited to the summit — Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman — to discuss what the Arab nations were expecting from the meeting, and to signal what the U.S. was prepared to offer at Camp David.

But administration officials said the Arab officials had pressed for a defense treaty with the U.S., pledging to defend them if they come under external attack. That was always going to be difficult, as such treaties — similar to what the U.S. has with Japan — must be ratified by Congress.

Instead Obama is prepared to offer a presidential statement, one administration official said, which is not as binding and which future presidents may not have to honor.

The Arab allies are also angry, officials and experts said, about comments Obama recently made in an interview with The New York Times, in which he said allies like Saudi Arabia should be worried about internal threats — “populations that, in some cases, are alienated, youth that are underemployed, an ideology that is destructive and nihilistic, and in some cases, just a belief that there are no legitimate political outlets for grievances.”

At a time when U.S. officials were supposed to be reassuring those same countries that the United States would support them, the comments were viewed by officials in the Gulf as poorly timed, foreign policy experts said.

In Paris on Friday, Kerry said that the U.S. and its Arab allies were “fleshing out a series of new commitments that will create between the U.S. and GCC a new security understanding, a new set of security initiatives that will take us beyond anything that we have had before.”

The king is the latest top Arab official who will not be attending the summit meeting for delegations from members of the Gulf Cooperation Council.

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates will both send their crown princes to the meetings, the officials said. The Emirati president, Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, was never expected to attend, because of health reasons, U.S. and Arab officials said. The sultan of Oman, Qaboos bin Said, also will not be attending because of health reasons, officials said.

Yousef Al Otaiba, the United Arab Emirates ambassador to the U.S., declined to say exactly what his government was pushing for from the United States when he spoke at a conference in Washington on Thursday.

“The last thing I want to say is ‘Here’s what we need,’” he said at a panel discussion sponsored by the Atlantic Council in Washington. “That’s not the right approach. The approach is, ‘Let’s come here, let’s figure out what the problems are, how we can work together to address our needs.’”

Salman’s decision to skip the summit meeting does not mean that the Saudis are giving up on the U.S. — they do not have many other options, said Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

“As upset as the Saudis are, they don’t really have a viable alternative strategic partnership in Moscow or Beijing,” Sadjadpour said.

But, he added, “there’s a growing perception at the White House that the U.S. and Saudi Arabia are friends but not allies, while the U.S. and Iran are allies but not friends.”

The New York Times

Share:

Comments

15 responses to “Saudi king snubbing Obama over policies on Iran”

  1. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    Oh Sub THIS, idiot speculating theorists. ANY representative of his county is representing it’s ‘Top Guys’ if sent on the mission … and considering there’s a battle going on in Saudi South, the King is staying where he should be. Getting the #2 isn’t any ‘sign’ of anything from the gods, especially for a ‘meeting’ of theoretical ‘Great Minds’ about Summitting. Why do Americans think Camp David is the top of the mountain??

    1. Caribbean Avatar
      Caribbean

      The Saudi’s should show some respect for our black president

      1. Is rouhani black!?

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar
          5thDrawer

          Certainly … especially in summer.

      2. 5thDrawer Avatar
        5thDrawer

        Hawiians never looked black to me … maybe lighter than a Rouhani in winter. ;-))

    2. Reasonableman Avatar
      Reasonableman

      Ali abdullah saleh just hours before talks of any truce officially made public his allience with his houthis.
      America has done it’s job and snatched yemen off of the brits.
      After that announcement is when talks of any truce were made.

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar
        5thDrawer

        At this point, the Brits are probably quite happy for that. 🙂

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar
          5thDrawer

          You’ll enjoy this one, Reasonable. The POOR will join anything just to eat.
          “Or, to be more precise, a face with distinctly Asian features. Many of those Afghans that have been sent into battle come from the Hazara, a Shia minority that are the poorest of the poor in Afghanistan.”
          http://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/politics/2015/5/12/syrian-regime-turns-to-foreigners-to-fight-its-battles#sthash.cIO45dbQ.dpuf

          1. Reasonableman Avatar
            Reasonableman

            Funny enough poor could only be measured by the subject, most people who are very wealthy feel they are average or below average because they measure themselves amongst their peers(or TV) and more than often spend there money on brand names and other costly things thus feeling like they don’t have enough.

            While the poor refuse to admit they are poorer then the average and compare themselves to people in worse situations.

            My 2cents is aslong as you continue to want, is aslong as you keep living in poverty.

          2. Reasonableman Avatar
            Reasonableman

            t is becoming increasingly obvious that colonialism-as we have come to
            know it during the last two hundred years cannot be identified with only
            economic gain and political power. In Manchuria, Japan consistently lost
            money, and for many years colonial Indochina, Algeria and Angola, instead
            of increasing the political power of France and Portugal, sapped it. This did
            not make Manchuria, Indochina, Algeria or Angola less of a colony. Nor did
            it disprove that economic gain and political power are important motives for
            creating a colonial situation. It only showed that colonialism could be
            characterized by the search for economic and political advantage without
            concomitant real economic or political gains, and sometimes even with
            economic or political losses. – Ashis Nandy

          3. 5thDrawer Avatar
            5thDrawer

            That’s true enough … and when you get older you may realize what we are most ‘poor’ on is Time. 😉 One thing for sure, the body tells you about poor things you did to it in earlier years while bashing it around. :-)))) At that point, one accepts being ‘rich’ in memories … and happy to have coffee. No-one can spend their way backward in Time – although many try – it’s where much money goes for those who have it. ;-)))
            But I talk about a culture, there too. Culture of the ‘Beauty-shop’ … hehehe
            It has often been noted the ‘lowest average income’ Province here puts in the most/per.capita to the charities. Perhaps expecting the least all the time – born into it – heightens the awareness when hearing that there are others in worse conditions.
            ‘Poor’ is when there’s no warmth when it snows, and no food on the blanket. ‘Hard life’.
            Excluding the bullets flying by, and walls blown in, the hardest adjustment for friends has been to actually realize they ARE poor – to know they have been made that by ‘others’ – and by ‘fate’ – at a moment in life-times when they should, by ‘all expectation’, been going ‘up’ in the world instead of down. The BIGGEST LOSS is ‘Time’. It’s the one thing that no-one can get back – even if there’s an expectation of ‘change’ to again be going up.
            When ‘things’ were slightly improving from ‘first downs’ and the thought that there was improvement, to being in one instant on a street with none of the poor possessions accumulated to that point, is to know defeat in life, even when not actually dead.
            That is what War ‘creates’. Sometimes it’s too difficult to retrieve an impoverished spirit.
            UNLESS ‘someone else’ reaches down to lift it up. ‘Belief’ can strengthen.
            Even then, the ‘Time’ can never be returned. Not even God can do that.

        2. Reasonableman Avatar
          Reasonableman

          LOL in the world of politics but what’s in the hearts only they and god know

  2. Rascal Avatar

    Does anybody really know what Obama’s foreign policy regarding Iran is? I certainly hope Obama is playing his middle-east cards right, but it doesn’t show very well that he has a clear direction.

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      For a President to need to state that ‘you can keep your doctor’, simply shows how little the public understands their own ‘system’, and how much they believe the fear&panic mongers who ‘pop up’ with the wild theories. There’s a lot of those it seems.

Leave a Reply