Scholars rank Kerry dead last in terms of effectiveness, survey

Share:
Kerry Kissinger
Secretary of State John Kerry with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger during a meeting in Washington , DC to seek his advice one day prior to visiting Russia , September 11, 2013 . International relations scholars rated Kissinger the most effective Secretary of State and Kerry the least effective

By Al Kamen

Secretary of State John Kerry, working diligently on some extraordinarily difficult foreign policy issues — China, neo-Soviet Russia, Islamic State, Iran, etc — isn’t getting even a tiny bit of credit these days from the tweedy, elbow-patched, wing-chair crowd.

Foreign Policy magazine this week announced the results of its 2014 Ivory Tower survey of 1,615 international relations scholars from 1,375 U.S. colleges.

One question they were asked was: “Who was the most effective U.S. secretary of state of the past 50 years?

The winner? Nobel Peace Prize winner Henry A. Kissinger, who was secretary for four years during the Nixon and Ford administrations. Since the Vietnam thing didn’t turn out so well, the scholars must have been grading him on openings to China and the Soviet Union when he was at the National Security Council?

Kissinger got 32.21 percent of the vote, extraordinary in such a large field.

“Don’t Know” came in a relatively distant second, with 18.32 percent.

James Baker — who was actually the most effective secretary in the last 50 years — came in third at 17.71 percent, just behind Dr. Know.

Madeleine Albright and Hillary Clinton tied for fourth at 8.70 percent.

George Shultz was sixth with 5.65 percent.

Dean Rusk, who served in the Kennedy-Johnson years, came in seventh at 3.51 percent.

Warren Christopher got 1.53 percent, tying Cyrus Vance for eighth place

Colin Powell was picked by 1.07 percent for tenth place.

Condoleezza Rice got the nod from 0.46 percent putting her in 11th place.

Lawrence Eagleburger came in 12th place with only 0.31 percent.

Then, dead last, is John Kerry. He also got a total of only five votes and tied Eagleburger’s 0.31 percent, but the magazine lists him at 13th.

This is all truly odd. Loop Fans may recall Eagleburger was only secretary of state for six weeks, from Dec. 8, 1992 to Jan. 20 1993. To be sure, he was acting secretary for three months before that, but it’s hard to say he left a huge diplomatic footprint.

(On the other hand, we always marveled at Eagleburger’s unerring ability to keep from blowing himself up as he alternated an inhaler in his right hand and a cigarette in his left.)

Odder still, the survey apparently forget that Nixon’s first secretary of state was William P. Rogers.

Well, Kerry’s only been at Foggy Bottom for only a couple years, so he’s got plenty of time to boost his standing. Nowhere to go but up with this scholarly crowd.

 

Washington Post

Share:

Comments

6 responses to “Scholars rank Kerry dead last in terms of effectiveness, survey”

  1. arzatna1 Avatar

    Nowhere to go but up !

    Kerry, your only chance to beat Kissinger
    1- Defeat Isis
    2- Get rid of Assad in Syria
    3- Make sure Iran does not get the bomb
    4- Finalize the 2 state solution for Israel and Palestine
    5- Keep Russia’s Putin at bay

    1. MekensehParty Avatar
      MekensehParty

      That’s a superman list 🙂
      If he can pull off a couple of the above he would have done good

  2. MekensehParty Avatar
    MekensehParty

    It certainly is a retrospect question. Kerry has been on the job for a couple of years and still has a couple ahead to mark his legacy.
    Kissinger saved the world from WWIII
    Doubtful anyone can rank higher until we make peace with the invading betelgueusians in 2177, but Kerry still has time to prove his worth, if any.

    1. Open Your Eyes Avatar
      Open Your Eyes

      Do you think Kerry gives a damn about some obscure survey?

  3. 5thDrawer Avatar

    Stupid ‘Surveys’ ….

  4. 5thDrawer Avatar

    SO …. A Survey With 1.17 ‘scholars’ input per ‘high education’ institute.
    There’s an ‘Ivory Tower’ somewhere, for sure ….

    WHY AM I READING THIS???

Leave a Reply