Analysis: Obama sets his own pace in a world of crisis


obama seriousobamaBy Karen DeYoung and Dan Balz

Short of world war, it’s rare that a chief executive goes through a foreign policy month like President Obama’s August.

U.S. warplanes struck in Iraq for the first time in years, as U.S. diplomats struggled to establish a new government in Baghdad. Islamic State militants beheaded an American journalist in Syria and spread their reach across the Middle East.

War raged between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. In Afghanistan, U.S. plans for an orderly exit at the end of the year teetered on the brink of disaster. Russia all but invaded Ukraine and dared Obama to stop it. Libya descended into violent chaos.

As events cascaded, Obama juggled rounds of vacation golf with public statements addressing the conflicts. But his cool demeanor, and the split-screen imagery of a president at play and at work, seemed ill-matched to the moment.

Then came a Thursday news conference and a comment that only reinforced criticism of a president neither fully engaged nor truly leaning into world problems. Speaking of the Islamic State, he said, “We don’t have a strategy yet.”

The statement may have had the virtue of candor, as Obama weighs the military and diplomatic components of a U.S. response and seeks support from other nations. But it hardly projects an image of presidential resolve or decisiveness at a time of international turmoil.

Republicans pounced on the statement. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), speaking Friday in Texas, said, “If the president has no strategy, maybe it’s time for a new president.” He said in a later e-mail that he would call a joint session of Congress to seek authority “to destroy ISIS militarily,” using another name for the Islamic State. Texas Gov. Rick Perry accused Obama of “lurching from crisis to crisis, always one step behind.”

White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said Obama will continue to move at his own speed to respond to these crises, regardless of criticism. “There’s no timetable for solving these problems that’s going to meet the cable news cycle speed,” he said. “It’s not a tenable thing. We’d much rather do this right than do it quickly. We tried the opposite [during the Bush years] and it worked out very poorly.”

This week, Obama will have an opportunity to show global leadership at a crisis-packed summit with European allies. Immediately afterward, Secretary of State John F. Kerry will travel to the Middle East, where potential partners, waiting to see whether Obama has the capacity to chart a clear, decisive course, are hoping for direction.

As the administration heads into those meetings, Kerry offered crisp and forceful marching orders. “Airstrikes alone won’t defeat this enemy,” he wrote in a Saturday op-ed article in the New York Times. “A much fuller response is demanded from the world. We need to support Iraqi forces and the moderate Syrian opposition, who are facing ISIS on the front lines.”

The world Obama now confronts is far different from the one he inherited when he came into office almost six years ago, and it is testing equally whether the style and substance of his leadership can win supporters and prevail against enemies.

In the first years of his presidency, Obama’s principal foreign policy goals were far less reactive and were more dependent on his initiative and sense of timing.

With a schedule for Iraq withdrawal already set, he developed policies for ending the then-faltering war in Afghanistan. In a pattern that would repeat itself on other issues, he deliberated for months, and then split the difference by simultaneously announcing a surge of troops and the timing of their departure.

But as he tried to engage the world on his terms, Obama quickly found out that the world had thoughts and plans of its own. Far from the reset Obama sought with Russia, President Vladimir Putin sought a new balance of power through aggression in Ukraine. While Obama offered a fresh start for the United States in the Muslim world, the Arab Spring headed toward destabilization rather than democracy.

Six years later, events seem to have spun out of his control, and Obama must react to the actions of others. Putin’s aggression in Ukraine has sparked the greatest East-West crisis since the Cold War. Islamic State advances have swallowed up a large swath of the Middle East and threaten a global upheaval far beyond the shock of al-Qaeda’s 2001 attacks.

Obama now must contemplate what could be a lengthy and messy recommitment of U.S. military might in a region that continues to defy his efforts to create stability. Having promised respectful relations among the big powers, he must prove that the non-military tools of power — diplomacy and economic pressure — will eventually force Russia back within its own borders.

Historian David Kennedy of Stanford University noted that Obama has struggled throughout his presidency to articulate a large and integrated vision in both domestic and foreign policy and contrasted that with the rhetorical and communications skills of Candidate Obama in 2008.

But he said Obama faces something of “devil’s brew” as he deals with a world of proliferating aggressors and the palpable exhaustion of the American people for military engagement. “There’s an expectation especially since World War II that the United States and president in particular can command events,” he said. “That’s not true and less true today than ever.”

Presidential advisers argue that Obama’s foreign policy management has born fruit, from getting the Syrians to give up their chemical weapons to bringing Iran to the negotiating table over its nuclear program to engendering the trust and credibility with other leaders to get European nations to support sanctions against Russia and rebuild a global coalition to deal with the Islamic State threat.

A senior official called Obama’s Iranian policy “a perfect example of a disciplined response that potentially leads to a good outcome.” Yet even former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton has expressed skepticism that Iranian negotiations will reach a successful conclusion and has been vocal in disagreeing with Obama’s earlier decisions not to intervene more directly to support rebel forces in Syria.

Officials across the government spent Friday trying to clean up after Obama’s Thursday news conference. They insisted that his “no strategy” remark had been misinterpreted and that what was being portrayed as hesitation and delay was instead a sign of due diligence and a sharp focus on developing an effective long-term plan.

Earlier statements by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, about the overall threat posed by Islamic State militants and the necessity of eventually taking the fight into Syria, coupled with reports that the United States had launched surveillance flights over Syria, prompted speculation of potentially imminent military action.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest denied a contradiction. “I think the president was pretty explicit that he is determined to make sure that every element of his national security strategy is thought through,” he said.

As Obama sought to nudge the debate back into his deliberative comfort zone, others urged him toward action. Ryan Crocker, who has served as U.S. ambassador in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria, pleaded with the president to stop deliberating and start acting. “I don’t think we have an alternative to swift, decisive military action to degrade ISIS in both Iraq and Syria. Give them no safe place to plan further attacks,” he said in a CNN interview Friday.

U.S. officials rejected the notion that they are not acting. They emphasized that Obama moved quickly in Iraq with airstrikes and said that this month’s operations there are the first step in a larger strategy against the Islamic State. They indicated that they will not be pushed into an immediate response to recent events in Syria.

“The dynamic that you want, that I think is possible, is that [Islamic State] has overreached and overextended itself, both in terms of the territory it’s tried to claim, and the number of enemies it’s managed to make,” a senior administration official said.

Limited airstrikes in Iraq, and the formation of a more inclusive version of Iraq’s Shiite-led government, will encourage Sunni Arab states to work together, under U.S. leadership, in ways that have eluded them thus far, the official said.

He added that the “international outrage in countries like Britain, France, Australia and Canada” over militants’ brutality, and the threat from Western passport holders within the Islamist organization, will make those countries more willing to participate in military and other operations against the militants in response to a patient and well-conceived U.S. strategy.

U.S. allies say they have a residual well of confidence in Obama despite what they saw as the failure of U.S. leadership over the past year in Syria.

“What I do regret,” said a senior European official, is that the Islamic State organization has become “exactly what we feared” last year, when Obama held back in arming moderate rebel forces in Syria and reversed course on U.S. military action there.

The Syria airstrikes, planned last August to punish President Bashar al-Assad for using chemical weapons and to destroy his weapons program, might have avoided the current mess by sending a message to Syrians and U.S. allies that Obama was engaged and recognized the growing Islamist threat, said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid publicly criticizing the president.

But the official believes that this summer has been different. Obama’s taking the lead on sanctions against Russia — and pressing reluctant Europeans to join — and the airstrikes this month against Islamic State in Iraq have gone some distance in restoring allied confidence in the president.

“It’s not my job to defend the administration,” the official said. “But they have acted, more than I expected.”

Obama addressed the global angst during a Friday fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee in Purchase, N.Y. He said that anyone watching the nightly news might feel that “the world is falling apart.” He acknowledged these are challenging times and that an unsustainable “old order” that had been in place for decades in the Middle East was destined to come apart.

“What we are seeing is the old order not working, but the new order not being born yet — and it is a rocky road through that process, and a dangerous time through that process,” he said.

American leadership “has never been more necessary, and there’s really no competition out there for the ideas and the values that can create the sort of order that we need in this world. . . . Our values, our leadership, our military power but also our diplomatic power, the power of our culture is one that means we will get through these challenging times just like we have in the past,” he said.

Jim Lindsay, senior vice president at the Council on Foreign Relations, said Obama’s inability to inspire confidence among critics has more to do with the complexity of the problems than the president’s leadership style. “He has a sort of perfect storm of messy problems, lousy options, ambivalent allies and a skeptical public,” he said.

Obama’s attempt at reassurance begged the question not only of exactly what course of action he will decide to take, but whether those policies will be too little, too late.

The crises in Ukraine and Syria-Iraq have overshadowed equally turbulent situations where the administration’s track record has not been encouraging. This summer’s war between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip continued for weeks, despite repeated U.S. efforts to stop it, until a tentative cease-fire was agreed upon under Egyptian auspices last week.

Despite two emergency visits by Kerry in the past several weeks, Afghanistan appeared headed toward a political train wreck, as the two candidates vying to replace President Hamid Karzai continued to dispute the results of this summer’s election. With the withdrawal of U.S. combat forces in December fast approaching, it remains uncertain whether there will be a government to agree to Obama’s plan to leave nearly 10,000 troops there for training and counterterrorism missions.

Kennedy, the historian, said that Obama, in dealing with multiple crises, also is trying to change perceptions of what U.S. leadership and any president can realistically accomplish. “It’s difficult virtually to the point of impossibility to have a grand strategy in a world that is so fluid and in which we no longer yield the power we once had. In a sense that is Obama’s strategy, a recognition of that fact. So that rhetorically as well as in reality, he’s trying to diminish the expectation that we can control events.”

Washington Post



13 responses to “Analysis: Obama sets his own pace in a world of crisis”

  1. MekensehParty Avatar

    It’s not that the US can’t control events around the world, with the bombers that we have we can control every event by force at least.
    It’s more the “will” to control events that is missing and that lack of will is not only apparent in the White House but in every American house.
    Endless and contrasting criticisms of US policies, a growing anti-US sentiment around the world (especially among allies that we directly support) and the feeling of no matter what we do they’ll keep hating America turned the majority of the population into semi or full isolationists.
    There is a ton of beautiful places to visit inside the US where you don’t get the feeling that the waiter spit in your drink because you’re American. We have a booming economy and far more jobs than the majority of countries around the world. There is justice and a legal system that surpasses in efficiency the rest of the world. We have a military that has a sizable edge on all other militaries… Those are the main reasons why Americans care little for the rest of the world and those same Americans voted and re-voted for Obama.
    It is not the USA that needs to be afraid today that it “lost” (by choice) its leading position in the world, it is the world who IS afraid today that the USA is not calling the shots. Mostly because they got used to sit back and criticize the US no matter what it does. Europeans became so critical but at the same time so dependent on the US to protect them and their interests that their laziness was suddenly slapped by the threat of Russian tanks rolling (again) into European capitals. Simple proof is the Ukrainian crisis and how they are still incapable of taking strong stances against a bullying Putin. The Arabs on the other hand are paying for these decades of anti-US propaganda that turned their populations into monsters the likes of ISIS/Qaeda or Hezbollah/Basij with these fanatics threatening to turn the middle east into a graveyard of beheaded corpses.
    What is great about Obama’s foreign policy is that it gave a taste to the world of what the world would look like if the Americans reciprocate the feeling and stop liking the rest of the world.
    The result is plain for all to see: friends and foes alike are begging for the US to come back and hold their hand. Whoever denies the results of such a grand and global end-strategy is not worthy of writing for the Washington Post.

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      Very good, Mekenseh.
      Always felt it was a strange love-hate relationship people had, for something that basically works for a majority of it’s people, even when I felt that system was in need of some tuning.
      Any country that managed to put together over 350 million souls who wanted something better than the places they came from, and basically gave it to them, shouldn’t be dumped on ALL the time … the little inconsistencies can be worked on.
      What country doesn’t have those?
      There was jealousy elsewhere when some tried to emulate it, obviously.
      Giving ‘your people’ suffrage isn’t as easily done elsewhere, and they hate you for it.
      Now, if we can only keep working on you to think like Canadians … what a wonderful world it will BE in The West. :-)) And to hell with the rest of them if they can’t be anything but always running with dictators. (And really, I know. Lobbyists are not the same as dictators. ;-))

      And by the way folks … if you’re living life in the middle of an Idaho Potatoe field, or a Prairie Wheat-field, the rest of the world is VERY VERY far away … just like Washington or Ottawa is. (I’m not advertising … just saying … you don’t have to come. )
      The good thing … these have the ‘feeling’ of ‘one country’ to us … because of realistic laws for it’s people, made by it’s people … and until they decide to change those, because they become antiquated, they live by them.
      Actually the Brits do too … and amazingly there’s no place further from the oceans in Britain than 76 miles. In North America, that’s often only about half-way to a weekend retreat. 😉
      And no-one shoots at you along the way. (well, maybe Texas … but you get the idea …)

      1. $89733098 Avatar

        Wow so u r just a dirty old man hoping to buy love in tripoli.

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar

          Or Australia, sexy. 😉
          I know the feeling of driving for days through ‘an outback’ … even alone.
          (Come to think of it, in a decent canoe too … ;-))
          Two can increase some pleasures …. maybe. :-))))))

          By the way, How much of Australia have you actually been IN.?

          1. $89733098 Avatar

            I’ve got u figured out. Very nasty of u to label me sunni and not have the decency nor courage to explain yourself.

          2. 5thDrawer Avatar

            You told me (us) you were Agnostic. I didn’t think that related to sex at all.
            Survival is another matter … of course. In THAT, I admit to age. And yes, age relates to decreased income. However, I HAD the experiences. 😉
            I don’t pay for Viagra … if there’s no-one to share the extension of time with.
            And ‘LOVE’ is a mis-used 4-letter word, too often to imagine the implications of when it is mis-used … especially by the young.
            ‘Sex’, on the other hand … a completely different topic.

            Now, back to topic. Don’t you Love Australia??
            Mekenseh and I stood up.

          3. $89733098 Avatar

            your comment was “your sunni side”. I asked you to explain yourself and you conveniently ignored my comment. Don’t play games with me, I don’t appreciate games.

          4. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Must have been a typo … Old song; ‘On The Sunny Side Of The Street’.
            Yours is in shade most of the time, I’d guess ….
            No games … although I had assumed you liked a game of Chest on occasion …

          5. $89733098 Avatar


          6. $89733098 Avatar

            speaking of old. i thought it said OVER 70

          7. $89733098 Avatar

            Shame ur pension can’t cover the cost of a love. Even in the outback

          8. $89733098 Avatar

            Does Viagra work at ur age great grandpa?

      2. MekensehParty Avatar

        You’ve never been to Texas 🙂
        you should, they’re the nicest and friendliest as soon as you tell them you were shooting communists in your youth. lololol
        Jokes apart, the model is indeed between the US and Canada. Both are great Human experiences away from the dogmas of the old world. I’d add Australia to them but not until they strip barabie of the nationality and send her back to Mosul.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *