“Only skeletons with yellow skin “remain in a sieged Syria camp

Share:

Skeleton  with yellow skin, syriaChildren, the elderly and others displaced by Syria’s civil war are starving to death in a besieged camp where women brave sniper fire to forage for food just minutes from the relative prosperity of Damascus.

The dire conditions at the Yarmouk camp are a striking example of the catastrophe unfolding in rebel-held areas blockaded by the Syrian government. U.S. and Russian diplomats said Monday the warring sides are considering opening humanitarian corridors to let in aid and build confidence ahead of an international peace conference on Syria.

Interviews with residents and U.N. officials, as well as photos and videos provided to The Associated Press, reveal an unfolding tragedy in the sprawling camp, where tens of thousands of Palestinian refugees and displaced Syrians are trapped under an intensifying yearlong blockade.

Forty-six people have died since October of starvation, illnesses exacerbated by hunger or because they couldn’t obtain medical aid, residents said.

“There are no more people in Yarmouk, only skeletons with yellow skin,” said 27-year-old resident Umm Hassan, the mother of two toddlers.

“There are no more people in Yarmouk, only skeletons with yellow skin,” said 27-year-old resident Umm Hassan, the mother of two toddlers.

“Children are crying from hunger. The hospital has no medicine. People are just dying,” she told the AP by telephone, adding that her 3-year-old daughter and 2-year-old son were rapidly losing weight from lack of food.

The dead include Isra al-Masri, an emaciated toddler who passed away on Saturday swaddled in a woolen sweater, her eyes sunken, her skin darkened, her swollen tongue wedged between her lips. The child was filmed minutes before her death, slowly blinking as she was held by an unidentified woman in a video sent to the AP by a 25-year-old resident, Sami Alhamzawi.

“Look at this child! Look at her!” the woman in the video shouts, thrusting the child before the camera. “What did she do to deserve this?”

hunger at Yarmuk campOther deaths suggest the extent of desperation among residents: Teenager Mazen al-Asali hung himself in late December after returning home without food to feed his starving mother. An elderly man was beaten to death by thieves who ransacked his home, looking for food and money.

Deaths have also been reported by opposition groups, activists and the United Nations.

Similar casualty figures were reported by the British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which documents Syrian casualties through a network of activists on the ground. The U.N. confirmed 15 deaths, but spokesman Chris Gunness said it was impossible to know the real toll because of restricted access.

“There is profound civilian suffering in Yarmouk, with widespread malnutrition and the absence of medical care,” Gunness said. “Children are suffering from diseases linked to severe malnutrition.”

The camp and other blockaded areas pose a stark challenge for Syria’s government and the opposition, who agreed to consider opening humanitarian access in the run-up to a peace conference next week in Switzerland that would bring the sides together for the first time.

Speaking in the midst of a two-day series of meetings in Paris, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said they were also pressing for a cease-fire and prisoner exchange between the warring sides.

But hopes appear slim.

The U.N. humanitarian chief said last month that an estimated 250,000 people in besieged communities in Syria were beyond the reach of aid. The government has kept outside aid sharply limited. Key humanitarian routes are increasingly cut off by the fighting, and kidnappings of aid workers are on the rise. Both Assad’s forces and rebels have used blockades to punish civilians.

Repeated efforts to bring food into Yarmouk have failed. Most recently, on Monday, six trucks loaded with U.N.-donated food to feed 10,000 people had to turn back after gunmen fired on the convoy, resident Alhamzawi said.

Some 160,000 Palestinians once lived in Yarmouk, a strategic prize for rebels and Assad forces for its close proximity to Damascus. They remained mostly neutral when the uprising began against Assad’s rule in March 2011.

But clashes erupted between pro- and anti-Assad Palestinian gunmen in December 2012, and most residents fled. The poorest, some 18,000 people, remained behind, according to U.N. estimates, along with tens of thousands of Syrians displaced from rebel-held areas that were seized back by the regime.

Pro-Assad Palestinian factions set up checkpoints around Yarmouk and progressively tightened a blockade of the area. By September, they banned residents from leaving, or food from entering.

It also meant residents couldn’t reach U.N. aid that was distributed outside the camp. The U.N. stopped operating inside Yarmouk in December, because of the fighting.

As months have passed, Yarmouk’s poorest have run out of food, according to residents and the U.N.

Families now dissolve spices in water and feed it to their children as soup. Some found animal feed, but residents suffered food poisoning after eating it.

A woman desperate to feed her children sneaked into a field surrounded by Syrian snipers to forage for mallow, a green herb. She was shot in the leg and hand, she said in a video uploaded by activists.

Lying on a bed, the woman’s bloodied hand shook as she wept, recounting how her children pleaded for food. She rushed into the field but heard gunfire and fell to the ground, bleeding and wounded. “For some mallow,” she wept. “To save us from death.”

The videos appear to be genuine and consistent with AP reporting on Yarmouk.

Within the camp, misery lives amid fear and defiance. Civilians shrink into their homes at dusk, as armed gunmen roam the streets.

Earlier this week, thieves beat up an elderly resident, who later died in a hospital, Alhamzawi told the AP by telephone. They stole his money – and his food. “It’s chaos,” he said.

Merchants bribe gunmen to sneak in food, but sell it at exorbitant prices. A kilo (2 pounds) of rice costs $50 – about half a month’s wage, residents said.

Despite the hardship, parents are still sending their famished children to school, where they are taught by hungry teachers, Umm Hassan said.

“Officials said we should stop because the children are dizzy and falling down, but we refused,” she said.

In recent months, local truces have partly resolved blockades in other rebel-held areas, with gunmen agreeing to disarm in exchange for allowing in food for residents.

The Yarmouk blockade appears to be the harshest yet, and the most intractable. Months of negotiations for rebels to disarm have failed, residents said.

An official of a pro-Assad Palestinian faction imposing the blockade said it wouldn’t be lifted until an estimated 3,000 rebels disarmed.

“The regime forces won’t remove the siege on the camp as long as the militants are staying in it, and the militants won’t leave,” said the official, Husam Arafat.

In the meantime, Palestinians in the West Bank have been running a campaign to raise awareness of the siege.

Protesters gathered outside the office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the West Bank city of Ramallah, demanding he find a solution.

“History will curse us if you allow Yarmouk’s people to die of hunger,” one sign read.

Share:

Comments

30 responses to ““Only skeletons with yellow skin “remain in a sieged Syria camp”

  1. 5thDrawer Avatar

    The ‘Warsaw Ghetto’ of Syria.

  2. 5thDrawer Avatar

    The ‘Warsaw Ghetto’ of Syria.

  3. The price of freedom is high , the price of giving up is higher.

    1. Hannibal Avatar

      What freedom? They were supposed to be back home in Palestine… The Syrian civil war is none of their business the same way it is none of the business of any Lebanese to interfere in Syria.
      We never liked the Syrians to interfere in our country why on Earth should we interfere in theirs? Palestinians should stay out of the conflict like they should have stayed out of the Lebanese civil war.

  4. The price of freedom is high , the price of giving up is higher.

    1. Hannibal Avatar

      What freedom? They were supposed to be back home in Palestine… The Syrian civil war is none of their business the same way it is none of the business of any Lebanese to interfere in Syria.
      We never liked the Syrians to interfere in our country why on Earth should we interfere in theirs? Palestinians should stay out of the conflict like they should have stayed out of the Lebanese civil war.

  5. Ali Harfouch analyses whether Syria’s rebel factions are able to unite against Bashar al-Assad or continue infighting, which could possibly hinder the effort to overthrow him.

    As the world’s powers and some Syrian rebel groups gather for the Geneva 2 talks, the Syrian revolution over the recent months has became all the more difficult to understand as differences between the array of rebel groups have grown.

    Discerning “who is who” was made increasingly complicated when a rift grew between the leaderships of the Jihadist factions in Syria. Jabhat an-Nusra and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) have received global attention and have eclipsed many of the other rebel factions who have long battled with the al-Assad regime.

    What is the relationship between these Jihadist factions with the indigenous factions? Why is there a rift between them? To understand these issues and other related matters, a handful of key developments need to be understood.

    Jabhat an-Nusra and ISIL/ISIS

    Around six months ago, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the “Islamic State of Iraq” released an audio statement in which he announced that Jabhat an-Nusra was to be dissolved back into the group from which it had (according to Baghdadi) originated – the Islamic State of Iraq. His organisation became known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (the Levant), or ISIS.

    The announcement sent shockwaves across the the world, but more so, amongst the leadership and rank-and-file within Jabhat an-Nusra. Within days, Abu Muhammad al-Joulani, the head of Jabhat an-Nusra rejected the proposal and “reaffirmed” his allegiance to Dr Ayman Al-Zawahiri who, for Joulani, represented the global Emir of Jihad whereas Baghdadi represented the cause in Iraq. As a result, a number of soldiers belonging to Jabhat an-Nusra renounced their affiliation with the organisation and joined the nascent and rapidly growing Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIS).

    Dr Ayman al Zawahiri and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

    In response to this divisive act, and in an attempt to quell the unrest and confusion amongst the mujahideen within both organisations, Al-Zawahiri sent letters to both Baghdadi and Joulani. In both letters, Zawahiri called upon Jabhat an-Nusra to remain autonomous and that the so-called “Islamic State of Iraq” should remain in Iraq. He repudiated Baghdadi for not having “consulted us”. Baghdadi, all the more defiant, responded with an outright rejection of Zawahiri’s compromise and stated that the “State would remain, and we will not bargain with it or back down from it until Allah the Almighty raises it above or we die without it”.

    Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri
    For Baghdadi, Zawahiri’s decision was not merely a strategic miscalculation, it was far graver; “As for the message that was attributed to Sheikh Ayman Al-Zawahiri, may Allah preserve him, we have … several shariah and method-based issues (with it), and the worshipper was given the choice between the command of His Lord and the command that opposes Allah’s command.”

    The implications of this insubordination were drastic; having defied Zawahiri, al-Baghdadi had essentially declared himself autonomous of al-Qaeda as a global organisation and of the global Jihadi movement – both of which were symbolically and organisationally represented by Zawahiri.

    As a result, two poles of leadership now exist in the Arab world; that of Zawahiri and that of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the latter of whom asserted himself as “Amir al-Mu’mineen” (the Leader of the Believers). Most political figures and movements have generally sided with one of the two camps.

    Position of scholars

    The three most prominent Salafi Jihadi scholars; Abu Muhammad Asim al-Maqdisi (Isam Muhammad Tahir al-Barqawi), Abu Qatada al-Filistini (Omar Mahmoud Othman) and Abu Basir at-Tartusi (Abd-al Mun’em Mustafa Halima) have repudiated the ISIS for their arbitrariness and exclusivity. Other prominent figures like Dr Iyad al-Qunaybi also critiqued the ISIS and urged the organisation to engage in a set of reforms which included changing the organisation’s name.

    More so, in a recent development most Jihadi factions in Syria including Ahrar ash-Sham, Suqur ash-Sham, Jaysh al-Islam and others formed a united front called al-Jubhat al-Islamiyyah (the Islamic Front). Soon after, a leaked letter written by Abu Muhammad Asim al-Maqdisi called for Islamic movements including the Muslim Brotherhood, Hizb ut-Tahrir and the Salafi Jihadi movement to unite in the face of the Egyptian government’s aggression against Morsi and his supporters. In contrast to calls for unity, the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIL) adopt a more exclusivist discourse.

    Rift

    The rift between Jabhat an-Nusra and its supporters on one hand, and the ISIS on the other is due to three fundamental reasons:

    Ambiguous Vision

    There is a confliction between the rebel factions regarding who the greater enemy is – the US or Assad.
    The Jihadi movement and its various factions are divided in their vision, with some of its key ideologues calling for an insurrection against the “close enemies” – the authoritarian regimes, while others calling for a global Jihad against the United States i.e. the “far enemy”. Accordingly, different strategies are employed by different movements all of which operate without an overarching framework held together by a coherent vision. Abu Musab az-Zarqawi’s “Four-Step” strategy, presented to al-Qaeda’s leadership 2004, is a prime example of conflicting strategies between al-Qaeda and its “local branches”.

    Unity

    The local branches of al-Qaeda across the Arab world were either direct products of al-Qaeda’s leadership, usually operatives sent by the leadership to lands of conflict and tasked with setting up the organization in a particular region, or local Jihadi movements which originated independently of al-Qaeda’s leadership but later joined the organisation by swearing allegiance to the late Osama bin Laden or Zawahari.

    In both cases, al-Qaeda’s leadership faced a paradox; for the local leaders to succeed within their volatile environments, they needed a great deal of autonomy – it was precisely this greater autonomy, however, that led to an impasse between al-Qaeda’s leadership and its local commanders. Paradoxically, one major reason that al Qaeda affiliates are not getting along is the great many opportunities before them. The turmoil in the Arab world has created security vacuums that Zawahiri has sought to exploit by calling on his local affiliates to set up shop. As they move in, they often disagree about who should be in charge.

    Infiltration

    Regional security services like those in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Syria have been known for heavily infiltrating Jihadi factions. Most recently, officials in Algeria, for example have admitted that it was indeed involved in several of the massacres attributed to the Jihadi factions in Algeria.

    A similar strategy has been employed by the Syrian regime towards al-Qaeda, in both its pre-Syrian revolution and post-revolution phase. According to Abu al-Baraa of the Revolutionary Military Council in Aleppo, “the Syrian regime is using an intelligence strategy against the rebels. One of its primary methods is to recruit elements to infiltrate areas under our control”.

    Assassinations of FSA members, rebel “infighting” and other similar acts have been attributed to these infiltrations. Perhaps the November airstrike against the high-level rebel commander Abdul Qadir Salih, whilst in a confidential meeting with other key and high-level rebel commanders indicates how far up these infiltrations have reached.

    Infighting

    The past two weeks have witnessed the most intense, wide-scale clashes between the ISIS and other revolutionary fronts. Clashes have erupted across Aleppo and Idlib following an attempt by the ISIS the city of al-Atarib, an attempt which came after the body of an Ahrar ash-Sham leader was found severely disfigured leading to subsequent protests against the ISIS.

    Around 40 brigades mentioned under Jaysh al-Islam were already under the umbrella of Liwa al-Islam.
    Soon after, a newly formed front called Jaysh al-Mujahideen published a statement demanding the dissolution of the ISIS and gave foreign fighters one of two options – leaving Syria within 24 hours or joining one of the existing factions within the Syrian Revolutionary Front. Significantly, the powerful Islamic Front, which makes up the bulk of fighters in Syria also published a statement albeit with less profound demands; the immediate withdrawal of the ISIS from the city of al-Atarib.

    Unmet demands were followed by raids, led by Jaysh al-Mujahideen and factions from the Islamic Front against various ISIS locations, leading to the expulsion of the ISIS from key locations as well as the the death or arrest of dozens of ISIS fighters.

    Abu Muhammad al-Joulani soon stepped in, releasing a statement in which he proposed a series of actions aiming at mediating between the rivaling factions. Al-Joulani began by noting that “Many aggressions have taken place in the field by factions against each other and the incorrect policies that the Islamic State (ISIS) follows in the field has greatly contributed to the exasperation of the conflict.” citing the arrest of JN’s amir in Raqqa after the ISIS accused him of apostasy as an example of such transgressions.

    For close observers of politics in the Muslim world, the JN-ISIS split is no anomaly but rather part of a larger pattern which the Arab Spring has brought to the surface. In fact, similar scenarios emerged in North Africa with Mokhtar Belmokhtar who defied Zawahiri’s orders and al-Qaeda’s “Libya Strategy” by creating his own domestic brigades. A counter-letter sent from the al-Qaeda leadership in North Africa to Belmokhtar’s brigade admitted; “And now, to the heart of the topic. Calling on God’s help, we say: Know, friends, that your letter clearly expressed your main wish, that is the desire for independence, separation and cutting of ties with the leadership of al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb”.

    Unsurprisingly, the content of the article is starkly similar to those sent to Zarqawi and al-Baghdadi: after all, they were dealing with the same problem. The main question on the minds of most now is whose voice will be the loudest amongst the Jihadi leadership in the “post-Arab Spring”? More importantly, who speaks in the name of the movement?

  6. Ali Harfouch analyses whether Syria’s rebel factions are able to unite against Bashar al-Assad or continue infighting, which could possibly hinder the effort to overthrow him.

    As the world’s powers and some Syrian rebel groups gather for the Geneva 2 talks, the Syrian revolution over the recent months has became all the more difficult to understand as differences between the array of rebel groups have grown.

    Discerning “who is who” was made increasingly complicated when a rift grew between the leaderships of the Jihadist factions in Syria. Jabhat an-Nusra and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) have received global attention and have eclipsed many of the other rebel factions who have long battled with the al-Assad regime.

    What is the relationship between these Jihadist factions with the indigenous factions? Why is there a rift between them? To understand these issues and other related matters, a handful of key developments need to be understood.

    Jabhat an-Nusra and ISIL/ISIS

    Around six months ago, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the “Islamic State of Iraq” released an audio statement in which he announced that Jabhat an-Nusra was to be dissolved back into the group from which it had (according to Baghdadi) originated – the Islamic State of Iraq. His organisation became known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (the Levant), or ISIS.

    The announcement sent shockwaves across the the world, but more so, amongst the leadership and rank-and-file within Jabhat an-Nusra. Within days, Abu Muhammad al-Joulani, the head of Jabhat an-Nusra rejected the proposal and “reaffirmed” his allegiance to Dr Ayman Al-Zawahiri who, for Joulani, represented the global Emir of Jihad whereas Baghdadi represented the cause in Iraq. As a result, a number of soldiers belonging to Jabhat an-Nusra renounced their affiliation with the organisation and joined the nascent and rapidly growing Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIS).

    Dr Ayman al Zawahiri and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

    In response to this divisive act, and in an attempt to quell the unrest and confusion amongst the mujahideen within both organisations, Al-Zawahiri sent letters to both Baghdadi and Joulani. In both letters, Zawahiri called upon Jabhat an-Nusra to remain autonomous and that the so-called “Islamic State of Iraq” should remain in Iraq. He repudiated Baghdadi for not having “consulted us”. Baghdadi, all the more defiant, responded with an outright rejection of Zawahiri’s compromise and stated that the “State would remain, and we will not bargain with it or back down from it until Allah the Almighty raises it above or we die without it”.

    Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri
    For Baghdadi, Zawahiri’s decision was not merely a strategic miscalculation, it was far graver; “As for the message that was attributed to Sheikh Ayman Al-Zawahiri, may Allah preserve him, we have … several shariah and method-based issues (with it), and the worshipper was given the choice between the command of His Lord and the command that opposes Allah’s command.”

    The implications of this insubordination were drastic; having defied Zawahiri, al-Baghdadi had essentially declared himself autonomous of al-Qaeda as a global organisation and of the global Jihadi movement – both of which were symbolically and organisationally represented by Zawahiri.

    As a result, two poles of leadership now exist in the Arab world; that of Zawahiri and that of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the latter of whom asserted himself as “Amir al-Mu’mineen” (the Leader of the Believers). Most political figures and movements have generally sided with one of the two camps.

    Position of scholars

    The three most prominent Salafi Jihadi scholars; Abu Muhammad Asim al-Maqdisi (Isam Muhammad Tahir al-Barqawi), Abu Qatada al-Filistini (Omar Mahmoud Othman) and Abu Basir at-Tartusi (Abd-al Mun’em Mustafa Halima) have repudiated the ISIS for their arbitrariness and exclusivity. Other prominent figures like Dr Iyad al-Qunaybi also critiqued the ISIS and urged the organisation to engage in a set of reforms which included changing the organisation’s name.

    More so, in a recent development most Jihadi factions in Syria including Ahrar ash-Sham, Suqur ash-Sham, Jaysh al-Islam and others formed a united front called al-Jubhat al-Islamiyyah (the Islamic Front). Soon after, a leaked letter written by Abu Muhammad Asim al-Maqdisi called for Islamic movements including the Muslim Brotherhood, Hizb ut-Tahrir and the Salafi Jihadi movement to unite in the face of the Egyptian government’s aggression against Morsi and his supporters. In contrast to calls for unity, the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIL) adopt a more exclusivist discourse.

    Rift

    The rift between Jabhat an-Nusra and its supporters on one hand, and the ISIS on the other is due to three fundamental reasons:

    Ambiguous Vision

    There is a confliction between the rebel factions regarding who the greater enemy is – the US or Assad.
    The Jihadi movement and its various factions are divided in their vision, with some of its key ideologues calling for an insurrection against the “close enemies” – the authoritarian regimes, while others calling for a global Jihad against the United States i.e. the “far enemy”. Accordingly, different strategies are employed by different movements all of which operate without an overarching framework held together by a coherent vision. Abu Musab az-Zarqawi’s “Four-Step” strategy, presented to al-Qaeda’s leadership 2004, is a prime example of conflicting strategies between al-Qaeda and its “local branches”.

    Unity

    The local branches of al-Qaeda across the Arab world were either direct products of al-Qaeda’s leadership, usually operatives sent by the leadership to lands of conflict and tasked with setting up the organization in a particular region, or local Jihadi movements which originated independently of al-Qaeda’s leadership but later joined the organisation by swearing allegiance to the late Osama bin Laden or Zawahari.

    In both cases, al-Qaeda’s leadership faced a paradox; for the local leaders to succeed within their volatile environments, they needed a great deal of autonomy – it was precisely this greater autonomy, however, that led to an impasse between al-Qaeda’s leadership and its local commanders. Paradoxically, one major reason that al Qaeda affiliates are not getting along is the great many opportunities before them. The turmoil in the Arab world has created security vacuums that Zawahiri has sought to exploit by calling on his local affiliates to set up shop. As they move in, they often disagree about who should be in charge.

    Infiltration

    Regional security services like those in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Syria have been known for heavily infiltrating Jihadi factions. Most recently, officials in Algeria, for example have admitted that it was indeed involved in several of the massacres attributed to the Jihadi factions in Algeria.

    A similar strategy has been employed by the Syrian regime towards al-Qaeda, in both its pre-Syrian revolution and post-revolution phase. According to Abu al-Baraa of the Revolutionary Military Council in Aleppo, “the Syrian regime is using an intelligence strategy against the rebels. One of its primary methods is to recruit elements to infiltrate areas under our control”.

    Assassinations of FSA members, rebel “infighting” and other similar acts have been attributed to these infiltrations. Perhaps the November airstrike against the high-level rebel commander Abdul Qadir Salih, whilst in a confidential meeting with other key and high-level rebel commanders indicates how far up these infiltrations have reached.

    Infighting

    The past two weeks have witnessed the most intense, wide-scale clashes between the ISIS and other revolutionary fronts. Clashes have erupted across Aleppo and Idlib following an attempt by the ISIS the city of al-Atarib, an attempt which came after the body of an Ahrar ash-Sham leader was found severely disfigured leading to subsequent protests against the ISIS.

    Around 40 brigades mentioned under Jaysh al-Islam were already under the umbrella of Liwa al-Islam.
    Soon after, a newly formed front called Jaysh al-Mujahideen published a statement demanding the dissolution of the ISIS and gave foreign fighters one of two options – leaving Syria within 24 hours or joining one of the existing factions within the Syrian Revolutionary Front. Significantly, the powerful Islamic Front, which makes up the bulk of fighters in Syria also published a statement albeit with less profound demands; the immediate withdrawal of the ISIS from the city of al-Atarib.

    Unmet demands were followed by raids, led by Jaysh al-Mujahideen and factions from the Islamic Front against various ISIS locations, leading to the expulsion of the ISIS from key locations as well as the the death or arrest of dozens of ISIS fighters.

    Abu Muhammad al-Joulani soon stepped in, releasing a statement in which he proposed a series of actions aiming at mediating between the rivaling factions. Al-Joulani began by noting that “Many aggressions have taken place in the field by factions against each other and the incorrect policies that the Islamic State (ISIS) follows in the field has greatly contributed to the exasperation of the conflict.” citing the arrest of JN’s amir in Raqqa after the ISIS accused him of apostasy as an example of such transgressions.

    For close observers of politics in the Muslim world, the JN-ISIS split is no anomaly but rather part of a larger pattern which the Arab Spring has brought to the surface. In fact, similar scenarios emerged in North Africa with Mokhtar Belmokhtar who defied Zawahiri’s orders and al-Qaeda’s “Libya Strategy” by creating his own domestic brigades. A counter-letter sent from the al-Qaeda leadership in North Africa to Belmokhtar’s brigade admitted; “And now, to the heart of the topic. Calling on God’s help, we say: Know, friends, that your letter clearly expressed your main wish, that is the desire for independence, separation and cutting of ties with the leadership of al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb”.

    Unsurprisingly, the content of the article is starkly similar to those sent to Zarqawi and al-Baghdadi: after all, they were dealing with the same problem. The main question on the minds of most now is whose voice will be the loudest amongst the Jihadi leadership in the “post-Arab Spring”? More importantly, who speaks in the name of the movement?

  7. In recent days, many media have once again focussed attention on the worsening plight of Muslims in the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp on the outskirts of Damascus, which has been besieged by the forces of the merciless Syrian regime for the last six months who have prevented food, medicines, or fuel from reaching its residents. The consequence has been severe malnutrition and starvation amongst its people, resulting in many deaths, including of women and children. The current state of the camp has been described by one journalist as resembling a ‘World War 2 ghetto’, and its 20,000 Muslim men, women, and children now face the prospect of a slow death from hunger.

    Other towns of the country face the same plight, including in Moadamiya that has been under a one year siege by the regime, resulting in the deaths of many children from starvation. It has become known as ‘the town of the starving’. Women and children rummage through garbage to find scraps of food to survive the day, but even then find nothing to sustain them. Amnesty International recently published a first-hand account from one of its residents who said, “Moadamiya’s children have learnt to differentiate between the flavours of different tree leaves – bitter, sweet or sour – in the same way children in other parts of the world differentiate between the flavour of pizza and meat slices with gravy and the taste of chocolate from crisp biscuits.” Pictures of emaciated bodies of young infants are rife on social media. Activists in the town describe children who just before dying cry and beg their mothers for food but their mothers are only able to watch helplessly. All this is an evolving genocide to add to the 130,000 who have already been killed in this brutal war.

    Comment:

    While the conscienceless Assad regime uses starvation as a weapon of war against thousands of innocent Muslim women and children, the despicable rulers and governments of the Muslim world have been engaging in and squandering millions of dollars of the Ummah’s wealth in Christmas and New Year celebrations, rather than mobilising and financing the Muslim armies to liberate Syria’s Muslims from their horrific ordeal. Dubai burnt $6 million worth of the Ummah’s wealth in a huge New Year Day’s fireworks display; in Abu Dhabi, a jewel-encrusted Christmas tree worth $11 million was put on display; and on New Year’s Eve, a Western female singer was reportedly paid $1.5 million to perform in a private celebration for the son of the Sultan of Brunei. Furthermore, representatives from the Arab League, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Jordan, Qatar, Indonesia, the UAE, and Iraq are to attend the Geneva 2 Conference on January 22nd that seeks to establish an agreement between the murderous Syrian dictatorship and the opposition. This will include the creation of a transitional government that will undoubtedly lead to the installing of the next Karzai-Maliki puppet ruler and regime that will implement a Western secular system and serve the selfish interests of its Western masters, at the expense of the people. The regimes of the Muslim world are therefore accomplices in a confederation of conspirators that seeks to steal and derail the sincere revolution of the Syrian Muslims who have paid a heavy cost and sacrificed their pure blood and that of their families in order to replace a secular dictatorship with guardianship under the rule of Islam and the Khilafah. Truly, the betrayal of the rulers of the Muslim world is beyond criminal and knows no bounds! They have not one iota of shame or humanity. It is high time that they be placed in the dustbin of history and replaced by a sincere ruler who embodies Islam and will be a shade to the oppressed.

    O Dear Sisters of Syria who inspire us with your courage, patience, and strength of iman! Your horrific plight tears our hearts apart. We cannot sleep for the pain we feel over your unbearable suffering. A deep sense of fear consumes us over the heavy accounting from our Rabb if we have been neglectful of our great responsibility to lift you from your oppression. We say to you that your brothers and sisters in Hizb ut Tahrir work tirelessly, day and night to establish the Khilafah state with urgency, the shield and protector of the Muslims that will bring your oppressors to their knees and end your nightmare. O dear sisters, stay sincere and steadfast to your revolution for Islam, and reject Geneva 2 and any other Kufr-inspired solutions for the future of Al-Sham that seek to usurp and crush your Islamic aspirations for your land. Know that your struggle for the Khilafah has inspired your Ummah the world over and by the Will of Allah سبحانه وتعالى, the victory that you seek is near.

    O Sincere Sons of the Muslim Armies! How can you bear to witness this genocide against your brothers and sisters in silence? How will you answer to your Lord for the negligence in protecting their lives? Rise to your Islamic duty of uprooting this dictatorship now and defending your Ummah! Sever your allegiance to your cowardly leaderships who have forsaken the Muslims and your Deen, chained you down while your brothers and sisters bleed, and conspired with Western governments to crush the Islamic uprising in Syria. Give victory to your Deen by giving your Nusrah (material support) to Hizb ut Tahrir urgently to establish the Khilafah that will mobilise you without hesitation or delay to protect the blood of this Ummah and liberate it from its oppressors.

    «‏إِنَّمَا الْإِمَامُ ‏‏جُنَّةٌ ‏ ‏يُقَاتَلُ مِنْ وَرَائِهِ وَيُتَّقَى بِهِ»

    “Indeed the Imam (Khalifah) is a shield from behind whom (one) would fight and one would protect oneself”.

    Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

    Dr. Nazreen Nawaz

    Member of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      (Wouldn’t be my ‘doctor of choice’ …) ;-)))

    2. Hannibal Avatar

      There are Christian Palestinians, Moslem Palestinians and non-believers Palestinians in Yarmouk… But you turn it into a holly war for Moslems yet again.

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Just one thing Hannibal … please … I have been trying to get this changed, but no-one is listening … and they’re all doing it … for God’s sake can we separate the plant from the religions and make that HOLY … not holly.? My eyes can’t take any more … :-)))))

  8. In recent days, many media have once again focussed attention on the worsening plight of Muslims in the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp on the outskirts of Damascus, which has been besieged by the forces of the merciless Syrian regime for the last six months who have prevented food, medicines, or fuel from reaching its residents. The consequence has been severe malnutrition and starvation amongst its people, resulting in many deaths, including of women and children. The current state of the camp has been described by one journalist as resembling a ‘World War 2 ghetto’, and its 20,000 Muslim men, women, and children now face the prospect of a slow death from hunger.

    Other towns of the country face the same plight, including in Moadamiya that has been under a one year siege by the regime, resulting in the deaths of many children from starvation. It has become known as ‘the town of the starving’. Women and children rummage through garbage to find scraps of food to survive the day, but even then find nothing to sustain them. Amnesty International recently published a first-hand account from one of its residents who said, “Moadamiya’s children have learnt to differentiate between the flavours of different tree leaves – bitter, sweet or sour – in the same way children in other parts of the world differentiate between the flavour of pizza and meat slices with gravy and the taste of chocolate from crisp biscuits.” Pictures of emaciated bodies of young infants are rife on social media. Activists in the town describe children who just before dying cry and beg their mothers for food but their mothers are only able to watch helplessly. All this is an evolving genocide to add to the 130,000 who have already been killed in this brutal war.

    Comment:

    While the conscienceless Assad regime uses starvation as a weapon of war against thousands of innocent Muslim women and children, the despicable rulers and governments of the Muslim world have been engaging in and squandering millions of dollars of the Ummah’s wealth in Christmas and New Year celebrations, rather than mobilising and financing the Muslim armies to liberate Syria’s Muslims from their horrific ordeal. Dubai burnt $6 million worth of the Ummah’s wealth in a huge New Year Day’s fireworks display; in Abu Dhabi, a jewel-encrusted Christmas tree worth $11 million was put on display; and on New Year’s Eve, a Western female singer was reportedly paid $1.5 million to perform in a private celebration for the son of the Sultan of Brunei. Furthermore, representatives from the Arab League, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Jordan, Qatar, Indonesia, the UAE, and Iraq are to attend the Geneva 2 Conference on January 22nd that seeks to establish an agreement between the murderous Syrian dictatorship and the opposition. This will include the creation of a transitional government that will undoubtedly lead to the installing of the next Karzai-Maliki puppet ruler and regime that will implement a Western secular system and serve the selfish interests of its Western masters, at the expense of the people. The regimes of the Muslim world are therefore accomplices in a confederation of conspirators that seeks to steal and derail the sincere revolution of the Syrian Muslims who have paid a heavy cost and sacrificed their pure blood and that of their families in order to replace a secular dictatorship with guardianship under the rule of Islam and the Khilafah. Truly, the betrayal of the rulers of the Muslim world is beyond criminal and knows no bounds! They have not one iota of shame or humanity. It is high time that they be placed in the dustbin of history and replaced by a sincere ruler who embodies Islam and will be a shade to the oppressed.

    O Dear Sisters of Syria who inspire us with your courage, patience, and strength of iman! Your horrific plight tears our hearts apart. We cannot sleep for the pain we feel over your unbearable suffering. A deep sense of fear consumes us over the heavy accounting from our Rabb if we have been neglectful of our great responsibility to lift you from your oppression. We say to you that your brothers and sisters in Hizb ut Tahrir work tirelessly, day and night to establish the Khilafah state with urgency, the shield and protector of the Muslims that will bring your oppressors to their knees and end your nightmare. O dear sisters, stay sincere and steadfast to your revolution for Islam, and reject Geneva 2 and any other Kufr-inspired solutions for the future of Al-Sham that seek to usurp and crush your Islamic aspirations for your land. Know that your struggle for the Khilafah has inspired your Ummah the world over and by the Will of Allah سبحانه وتعالى, the victory that you seek is near.

    O Sincere Sons of the Muslim Armies! How can you bear to witness this genocide against your brothers and sisters in silence? How will you answer to your Lord for the negligence in protecting their lives? Rise to your Islamic duty of uprooting this dictatorship now and defending your Ummah! Sever your allegiance to your cowardly leaderships who have forsaken the Muslims and your Deen, chained you down while your brothers and sisters bleed, and conspired with Western governments to crush the Islamic uprising in Syria. Give victory to your Deen by giving your Nusrah (material support) to Hizb ut Tahrir urgently to establish the Khilafah that will mobilise you without hesitation or delay to protect the blood of this Ummah and liberate it from its oppressors.

    «‏إِنَّمَا الْإِمَامُ ‏‏جُنَّةٌ ‏ ‏يُقَاتَلُ مِنْ وَرَائِهِ وَيُتَّقَى بِهِ»

    “Indeed the Imam (Khalifah) is a shield from behind whom (one) would fight and one would protect oneself”.

    Written for the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir by

    Dr. Nazreen Nawaz

    Member of the Central Media Office of Hizb ut Tahrir

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      (Wouldn’t be my ‘doctor of choice’ …) ;-)))

    2. Hannibal Avatar

      There are Christian Palestinians, Moslem Palestinians and non-believers Palestinians in Yarmouk… But you turn it into a holly war for Moslems yet again.

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Just one thing Hannibal … please … I have been trying to get this changed, but no-one is listening … for God’s sake can we separate the plant from the religions and make that HOLY … not holly.? My eyes can’t take any more … :-)))))

  9. Fauzia45 Avatar

    Children are always the victims of dirty politics!!!!!!

  10. Fauzia45 Avatar

    Children are always the victims of dirty politics!!!!!!

  11. man-o-war Avatar

    “Palestinian minister on Tuesday accused “terrorists” fighting to topple Syrian President Bashar al-Assad of blocking aid access to the Yarmuk refugee camp in southern Damascus.”

    From a Daily Star article

    1. This is so sad

      1. man-o-war Avatar

        Agreed, hopefully whoever is blocking aid puts an end to the insanity soon.

        1. Yup (18,000th comment, LOL)

          1. ...some guy Avatar
            …some guy

            So you just wanted turn the comment meter from 17999 to 18000 but did not really mean what you said? let me know so I cab flip the arrow back down.

          2. A hundred comments difference between my first and second comments (Im posting on CNN now)

  12. man-o-war Avatar

    “Palestinian minister on Tuesday accused “terrorists” fighting to topple Syrian President Bashar al-Assad of blocking aid access to the Yarmuk refugee camp in southern Damascus.”

    From a Daily Star article

    1. cook2half Avatar

      This is so sad

      1. man-o-war Avatar

        Agreed, hopefully whoever is blocking aid puts an end to the insanity soon.

        1. cook2half Avatar

          Yup (18,000th comment, LOL)

          1. So you just wanted turn the comment meter from 17999 to 18000 but did not really mean what you said? let me know so I cab flip the arrow back down.

          2. cook2half Avatar

            A hundred comments difference between my first and second comments (Im posting on CNN now)

Leave a Reply to Hannibal Cancel reply