Iran denies having forces in Syria to support Assad

Share:

iran revolutionary guardsIran, the strongest supporter of the Syrian regime, denied on Friday that it had forces in war-torn Syria supporting embattled President Bashar al-Assad.

Iran’s statement came a day after nations gathering at the Friends of Syria meeting in Amman called for an immediate withdrawal of fighters belonging to the Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah and Iran from Syria.

“The true enemies of Syria make up these accusations to provoke the people of this country,” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Araqchi said, quoted by Iranian state television.

On Wednesday, Iranian Ambassador to Turkey Alireza Bikdeli also downplayed the question when asked by Today’s Zaman to comment on Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s claims that suggested Iran is participating in the fighting in Syria with the forces loyal to Assad.

Speaking on his return from a visit to the US, the prime minister said on Tuesday that Hezbollah and others are involved in fighting alongside forces loyal to Assad and slammed his critics for turning a blind eye to that.

Erdoğan’s statement came as Hezbollah fighters joined the Syrian soldiers and militiamen loyal to Assad during fighting over the weekend in the opposition stronghold of Qusair, a town close to the Lebanese border.

The downfall of Assad’s regime in Syria is expected to deal a critical blow to the Syria-Iran-Hezbollah axis. Hezbollah in Lebanon would have much greater difficulty obtaining Iranian military and financial support, while Iran would be disconnected from a valuable ally in Lebanon.

Hezbollah, which in the past has received military and financial support from Syria and Iran, has strongly supported the Assad regime politically, as has Iran.

Iranian politics have been influential in Syria, especially through Hezbollah.

 

WT

Share:

Comments

13 responses to “Iran denies having forces in Syria to support Assad”

  1. Guest Avatar

    Iran’s Quds Force appears to be in Syria these days. It is interesting that this force is named after Jerusalem given that Mecca, Medina, Najaf, Karabala, Qom, etc. are more important Shiite holy cities than Jerusalem. Also, this force has been in Syria and Lebanon as part of the resistance but it has not been in Jerusalem despite its name. It’s Iranian smoke and mirrors.

  2. Guest Avatar

    Iran’s Quds Force appears to be in Syria these days. It is interesting that this force is named after Jerusalem given that Mecca, Medina, Najaf, Karabala, Qom, etc. are more important Shiite holy cities than Jerusalem. Also, this force has been in Syria and Lebanon as part of the resistance but it has not been in Jerusalem despite its name. It’s Iranian smoke and mirrors.

    1. HaniibalLouti Avatar
      HaniibalLouti

      indeed the only ones who went to quds were the king of saudi arabia and hariri to pay israel to help them get rid of the rafida kouffars

  3. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    So did Nastyrallah … deny, deny, deny … oops. Were they not all ‘technicians helping’ ??
    ‘Well, we don’t control who goes across a border, after all … not our doing.’
    (where’s that excuse list … damn … put it here somewhere …)

  4. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    So did Nastyrallah … deny, deny, deny … oops. Were they not all ‘technicians helping’ ??

    1. HaniibalLouti Avatar
      HaniibalLouti

      i checked oxford, nastyrallah word is not present; on the other hand i find your nasty text inappropriate and meaningless

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar
        5thDrawer

        Well you can’t accuse me of a personal attack on anyone then, can you?
        But I’m happy you looked up ‘nasty’. Dork.

  5. Patience2 Avatar
    Patience2

    Lying is ingrained in the make-up of the rulers of Iran. Has been for 1400 years, or so.

  6. Patience2 Avatar
    Patience2

    Lying is ingrained in the make-up of the rulers of Iran. Has been for 1400 years, or so.

    1. HaniibalLouti Avatar
      HaniibalLouti

      i think history proves you wrong since the persian empire by far exceeded arabic sunnism in academic scientific and litterary domains

      1. Patience2 Avatar
        Patience2

        Maybe, before the advent of Islam, but, then truth went out the window, and, ever since, even up to now. What was it, Taqiyya … of Sunni origin but brought to perfection by the Shia (you know, ol’ fuzzy-face and his likes) that makes it impossible to believe/deal-with any of these ‘fruit-flies’. Just listen to them spinning their BS and try to carry on.

Leave a Reply