Islamists claim win in Tunisia’s Arab Spring vote

Share:

Moderate Islamists claimed victory on Monday in Tunisia’s first democratic election, sending a message to other states in the region that long-sidelined Islamists are challenging for power after the “Arab Spring.”

Official results have not been announced, but the Ennahda party said its workers had tallied the results posted at polling stations after Sunday’s vote, the first since the uprisings which began in Tunisia and spread through the region.

“The first confirmed results show that Ennahda has obtained first place,” campaign manager Abdelhamid Jlazzi said outside party headquarters in the center of the Tunisian capital.

As he spoke, a crowd of more than 300 in the street shouted “Allahu Akbar!” or “God is great!” Other people started singing the Tunisian national anthem.

Mindful that some people in Tunisia and elsewhere see the resurgence of Islamists as a threat to modern, liberal values, party officials said they were prepared to form an alliance with two secularist parties, Congress for the Republic and Ettakatol.

“We will spare no effort to create a stable political alliance … We reassure the investors and international economic partners,” Jlazzi said.

Sunday’s vote was for an assembly which will sit for one year to draft a new constitution. It will also appoint a new interim president and government to run the country until fresh elections late next year or early in 2013.

The voting system has built-in checks and balances which make it nearly impossible for any one party to have a majority, compelling Ennahda to seek alliances with secularist parties, which will dilute its influence.

“This is an historic moment,” said Zeinab Omri, a young woman in a hijab, or Islamic head scarf, who was outside the Ennahda headquarters when party officials claimed victory.

“No one can doubt this result. This result shows very clearly that the Tunisian people is a people attached to its Islamic identity,” she said.

REVOLUTION INSPIRED UPRISINGS

Tunisia became the birthplace of the “Arab Spring” when Mohamed Bouazizi, a vegetable seller in a provincial town, set fire to himself in protest at poverty and government repression.

His suicide provoked a wave of protests which, weeks later, forced autocratic president Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali to flee to Saudi Arabia.

The revolution in Tunisia, a former French colony, in turn inspired uprisings which forced out entrenched leaders in Egypt and Libya, and convulsed Yemen and Syria — re-shaping the political landscape of the Middle East.

Ennahda is led by Rachid Ghannouchi, forced into exile in Britain for 22 years because of harassment by Ben Ali’s police.

A softly spoken scholar, he dresses in suits and open-necked shirts while his wife and daughter wear the hijab.

Ghannouchi is at pains to stress his party will not enforce any code of morality on Tunisian society, or the millions of Western tourists who holiday on its beaches.

He models his approach on the moderate Islamism of Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan.

The party’s rise has been met with ambivalence by some people in Tunisia. The country’s strong secularist traditions go back to the first post-independence president, Habiba Bourguiba, who called the hijab an “odious rag.”

Outside the offices of the commission which organized the election, about 50 people staged a sit-in demanding an investigation into what they said were irregularities committed by Ennahda. Election officials said any problems were minor.

“I really feel a lot of fear and concern after this result,” said Meriam Othmani, a 28-year-old journalist. “Women’s rights will be eroded,” she said. “Also, you’ll see the return of dictatorship once Ennahda achieves a majority in the constituent assembly.”

SECULAR PARTNERS

Ennahda’s preferred coalition partners may reassure some opponents. Ali Larayd, a member of the party’s executive committee, said it was ready to form an alliance with the Congress for the Republic and Ettakatol, both secularist groups respected by Tunisia’s intelligentsia.

The Congress is led by Moncef Marzouki, a doctor and human rights activist who spent years in exile in France. Ettakatol is a socialist party led by Mustafa Ben Jaafar, another doctor and veteran Ben Ali opponent.

The only official results released were from polling stations abroad, because they voted early.

The election commission said that out of 18 seats in the 217-seat assembly allocated to the Tunisian diaspora, 9 went to Ennahda. Its closest rivals were Marzouki’s Congress on four seats and Ettakatol, which won three.

The highest-profile secularist challenger to Ennahda, the Progressive Democratic Party (PDP) conceded defeat. It had warned voters that modern, liberal values would be threatened if the Islamists won.

“The PDP respects the democratic game. The people gave their trust to those it considers worthy of that trust. We congratulate the winner and we will be in the ranks of the opposition,” a party statement sent to Reuters said.

Ennahda’s win was a remarkable turnaround for a party which just 10 months ago had to operate underground because of a government ban and which had hundreds of followers in prison.

In a slick and well-funded campaign, the party tapped into a desire among ordinary Tunisians to be able to express their faith freely after years of aggressively enforced secularism.

It also sought to show it could represent all Tunisians, including the large number who take a laissez-faire view of Islam’s strictures, drink alcohol, wear revealing clothes and rarely visit the mosque.

Secularist opponents say they believe this is just a cleverly constructed front that conceals more radical views, especially among Ennahda’s rank and file in the provinces.

The party’s final election rally last week was addressed by one of Ennahda’s candidates, a glamorous woman who does not wear a hijab.

On the fringes of the same rally, stalls sold books by Salafist authors, followers of a strict interpretation of Islam who believe women should be covered up and that the sexes should be segregated in public.

Reuters

Share:

Comments

26 responses to “Islamists claim win in Tunisia’s Arab Spring vote”

  1. Sebouh80 Avatar

    Wow. Another blow to the  so called Arab spring.

    Wherever I look I see reactionary and conservative forces with new names preparing to take over .

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      It is the ‘nature’ of humans, after difficult or tumultuous times, to seek peace and order. Time will tell just how ‘moderate’ and ‘democratic’ any Islamist group can possibly be after this almost bloodless change in Tunisia. Perhaps watching their neighbours has made them a little thankful for an era of enforced secularity – oppressive as it was in other ways.
       Although moderation in all things is often noted to be better for one’s health when it comes to food and exercise, the concept does not hold a place in many ‘religions’ … or follow in people’s minds (often filled with superstitions too) … if the politics, by use of sensible laws for all types of humans, cannot be kept apart from the ideologues.
      The French were not there long enough to entrench ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity’ in the minds of all society. We will see, I suppose.

      1. Sebouh80 Avatar

        I disagree with you in this respect.

        There is a  famous Lebanese saying called “Maktoub Beinara min anwanu”. This alone summarizes my conviction.

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar

          THE LETTER IS READING FROM HIS SUBJECT ??  Hmmm … well … perhaps things can reverse themselves … but only if the people wish it.

    2. prophettt Avatar

      Even though I share your concern regarding extremist groups filling in the political vacuums left by the deposed dictators,I tend to believe that giving religious political groups opportunities to be part of a political process is much better than pushing them underground,and giving some of them them excuses to become more extremists ,and resort to violence. Despite all doubts,some might have about turkey’s experience with religious group, It did prove that religious group can be part of a democratic process,and can become more moderate and more tolerant,but definitely not the liberal minded parties you and I would prefer. As far as I know,no one had predicted Egypt or Tunisia to turn into western-like democracies ,but rather realistic people hopped for civil societies to replace oppressive police states ,and that enough changes to take place where people can choose their own representatives in a fair political system along with freedom of expression , and protection of civil and human rights.
      Non of the countries , where revolution swept away the ruling dictators, had  true legitimate political parties with any credibility, and non had any functioning political life to begin with. Most opposition parties,in Egypt and Tunisia, were really a decor which had been approved by the regimes to justify their own ‘elections” and “democratic processes”.The opposition-at least the majority of them – parties opposed the fact that they were not in power,but not the political structure itself. In other words,the leaders of those opposition parties would have been very happy to be the dictators themselves.

      What concerns me the most,and what we should keep our eyes on ,are the processes these countries are putting in place. If the process of election is fair and legitimate,then,I’m willing to accept the result.The results will and can change as the political parties are developed. I hope I’m not being too optimistic,but at least we will know and understand what the people of these countries want,and based on that we can Judge  them. The late Sayed Fadlallah,known to have been very open minded , had urged all religious Muslim groups and parties to study the Turkish experience. Our dream of secularizing the Muslim world in the near future,at least, is really a waste of time. Legitimate elections will give people options,and hold them accountable next time election is held,I hope.

  2.  Avatar

    Wow. Another blow to the  so called Arab spring.

    Wherever I look I see reactionary and conservative forces with new names preparing to take over .

    1.  Avatar

      It is the ‘nature’ of humans, after difficult or tumultuous times, to seek peace and order. Time will tell just how ‘moderate’ and ‘democratic’ any Islamist group can possibly be after this almost bloodless change in Tunisia. Perhaps watching their neighbours has made them a little thankful for an era of enforced secularity – oppressive as it was in other ways.
       Although moderation in all things is often noted to be better for one’s health when it comes to food and exercise, the concept does not hold a place in many ‘religions’ … or follow in people’s minds (often filled with superstitions too) … if the politics, by use of sensible laws for all types of humans, cannot be kept apart from the ideologues.
      The French were not there long enough to entrench ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity’ in the minds of all society. We will see, I suppose.

      1.  Avatar

        I disagree with you in this respect.

        There is a  famous Lebanese saying called “Maktoub Beinara min anwanu”. This alone summarizes my conviction.

        1.  Avatar

          THE LETTER IS READING FROM HIS SUBJECT ??  Hmmm … well … perhaps things can reverse themselves … but only if the people wish it.

        2.  Avatar

          THE LETTER IS READING FROM HIS SUBJECT ??  Hmmm … well … perhaps things can reverse themselves … but only if the people wish it.

    2.  Avatar

      Even though I share your concern regarding extremist groups filling in the political vacuums left by the deposed dictators, I believe that giving religious group a chance to be part of a political process is much better than pushing them underground,and giving them the excuse they seek in order to become more extremists . With all the questions, people might have about turkey’s experience with religious group, It did prove that religious group can be part of a democratic process,and can become more moderate ,and tolerant.
      Non of the countries that got rid of its dictators had  true political parties with any credibility. Most opposition parties,in Egypt and Tunisia, were really a decor which had been approved by the regimes to justify their own ‘elections” and “democratic processes”.

      What concerns me the most,is the kind of processes these countries are putting in place. If the process of election is fair and legitimate,then,I’m willing to accept the result.The results will change as the political parties are developed. I hope I’m not being too optimistic,but at least we will know and understand what the people of these countries want,and based on that we can Judge  them. The late Sayed Fadlallah,known to have been very open minded , had urged all religious Muslim groups and parties to study the Turkish experience. Our dream of secularizing the Muslim world in the near future,at least, is really a waste of time. Legitimate elections will give people options,and hold them accountable next time election is held,I hope.

  3. master09 Avatar

    This is the problem with the basic thinker, 90% of people think the Arab Spring was going to turn the ME into a new world.
    Think again we are talking about ARABS YES ARABS enough said.

    From where does freshness come?

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      Difficult to shake out all the sand unless the robes come off completely … although, that can be just as refreshing in the middle of a clean sandy desert as at the right beach. If one never tries it, one never knows. 🙂

  4.  Avatar

    This is the problem with the basic thinker, 90% of people think the Arab Spring was going to turn the ME into a new world.
    Think again we are talking about ARABS YES ARABS enough said.

    1.  Avatar

      Difficult to shake out all the sand unless the robes come off completely. 🙂

  5. Constantin7 Avatar
    Constantin7

    Let Annahda rule in a coalition with the 2 secular party and let’s see their performance. I doubt that they are going to deny the people its freedom, its “relative” modernism, its civilized laws (very similar to European laws). Tunisia is the only Arab country where polygamy is illegal. Tunisians and any Arab countries (other than Lebanon) have never known any democracy so their first reaction to elect any party is to elect a religious party which “appears” to be less apt for corruption than the other parties, which they have not voted for in the past. So Tunisia and the rest of the Arab world are on the road of learning democracy and applying it. Hopefully, all these new Arab governments will be transparent and accountable for their people and any corruption or wrong doing from their part will be highlighted in the media and followed up by the legal system. 

  6.  Avatar

    Let Annahda rule in a coalition with the 2 secular party and let’s see their performance. I doubt that they are going to deny the people its freedom, its “relative” modernism, its civilized laws (very similar to European laws). Tunisia is the only Arab country where polygamy is illegal. Tunisians and any Arab countries (other than Lebanon) have never known any democracy so their first reaction to elect any party is to elect a religious party which “appears” to be less apt for corruption than the other parties, which they have not voted for in the past. So Tunisia and the rest of the Arab world are on the road of learning democracy and applying it. Hopefully, all these new Arab governments will be transparent and accountable for their people and any corruption or wrong doing from their part will be highlighted in the media and followed up by the legal system. 

  7. antar2011 Avatar

    i am discusted by the racist comments from some posters on this site.
    what is wrong with moderate muslims?
    what is wrong with being arabs?
    poeple are judging others based on mere assumptions.

    to rub your noses in the sand….without ‘arabs” and ‘muslims”, european would have still been living in the dark ages…like it or not.
    i am glad to be an arab…AND  a muslim and alhamdulilah for the first time after so much oppression [from foreigners first then from our own fellas] in our own lands, time to remind those racist p***, we are humans too.

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      Apologies Antar if I seemed to be one of ‘those’ … while I have enjoyed an occasional roasted pig, I would not consider myself racist, and do enjoy friendships with people of many different skin-colours. But we are all ‘allowed’ to discriminate when it comes to choosing friends. Perhaps only the blind do not base their initial assessment of others on first sight, however unfortunately, and that comes from a biological need for defense more than anything. I agree it should not be the only reason to shun or malign anyone.
      Arabs – as a race – have contributed as much as any other to the human experience of this ‘age’, and in earlier times perhaps more, since the development of the species – especially in the ‘social’ sense – grew from near that part of the planet. No-one should or would deny that. It is one of those mundane ‘facts’ which can’t be ignored. Just as the histories of societal development can’t be ignored in places like India or China, it has a long presence of existence.
      As mankind walked the earth, however, his societal development was impeded by various factors – usually related to survival. In the northern climates, it took most of a human’s efforts and time simply to prepare for winters which can take your breath away – and this most readily explains a slower development of those peoples and their societies. Yet what the Romans and others determined were Barbarians, were in fact societies of humans too. They had banded together in the need to help each other in that survival and gradually improve their circumstances – as had more southern peoples – but at a slower rate. There simply wasn’t the time to sit and contemplate all the wonders of the universe.
      Well … not quite the same way.
      And they ended up with a variety of ‘gods’ – as had the peoples of the Mediterranean zones, or India and China, before the ‘more advanced’ societies began to peg us with the ‘one god’ theory. And then, politics got into the act.
      Those road-building Romans helped advance progress of the northern ‘tribes’ and also the export of the one-god theory. I prefer to think the northern tribes picked one that worked best with a life-style necessary for the societal survival techniques they had learned … while at the same time picking the brains of the then-more advanced southern tribes … although there ARE still a lot of superstitions in the minds of humans.
      And that brings me to at least some of the differences now in the ‘one-god’ theories.
      It’s mind-boggling.
      There is nothing wrong with ‘moderation’ … in fact it’s what we strive for. And if we’re all going to believe the ‘one-god’ concept, then we should be allowing various ‘others’ to have their own thoughts on how it applies to their own lives – which DO vary as greatly as the minds which have different life-learning experiences as well as fragments of superstitions.
      If we could learn to move within each other’s societies without trying to change them or being made to feel we could not become a part of them for the benefits they all undoubtably have, there would probably be much less ‘type-casting’.
      Although there would still be the occasional ‘joke’ fired at any of us too … even friends do that, don’t they?
      The ‘political animals’ are the ones who place us at odds with one another – by using ‘religion’ and superstitious beliefs as a tool for hatred and oppression. If we don’t let them do that, it will be better for us all.
      I know it’s not good for my health to eat it every day … but I’m having bacon and eggs this morning. MY choice.
      Wish you a good day. 🙂

    2. master09 Avatar

      Antar I apologies as well if I am seen as that, Racist. But let me tell you first I am a million miles from that and I was also born in the ME and have nothing against THE PEOPLE in general or the Muslims , 70% out of  of my friends are Muslims.
      But what I am against is the leaders who have,  are and will always control the way people will live and want to live for what to make a lot of money and keep the others poor, in the dark and hungry. 

      If these leaders are for the people than let them choose in a REFERENDUM, not just the way a small group of people want.
      Is that not what the Arab Spring was all about…….? 

      On another subject what will happen to the Christians in those countries that are persecuted and  have no say on what happens in their life or religion, is that not racist. Can they not have a say in these countries.

      I will tell you a story, in a western country a group of Muslim women complained that they could not swim in a public pool because of western men and women swim in the same pool, so the council spent $30,000 to put a screen to make them happy and have that space  for them to swim in.     I not sure what that means is that not……….??   

      I want to ask a ? do you think the new people in power across the ME and the ones who will be put in power, will they treat their people like HUMANS including females with some equal rites and if you think so how do you know this will happen ?.

      So again I apologies but the words are not directed to Muslims or the people.

      Good day to you.

  8.  Avatar

    i am discusted by the racist comments from some posters on this site.
    what is wrong with moderate muslims?
    what is wrong with being arabs?
    poeple are judging others based on mere assumptions.

    to rub your noses in the sand….without ‘arabs” and ‘muslims”, european would have still been living in the dark ages…like it or not.
    i am glad to be an arab…AND  a muslim and alhamdulilah for the first time after so much oppression [from foreigners first then from our own fellas] in our own lands, time to remind those racist p***, we are humans too.

    1.  Avatar

      Apologies Antar if I seemed to be one of ‘those’ … while I have enjoyed an occasional roasted pig, I would not consider myself racist, and do enjoy friendships with people of many different skin-colours. But we are all ‘allowed’ to discriminate when it comes to choosing friends. Perhaps only the blind do not base their initial assessment of others on first sight, however unfortunately, and that comes from a biological need for defense more than anything. I agree it should not be the only reason to shun or malign anyone.
      Arabs – as a race – have contributed as much as any other to the human experience of this ‘age’, and in earlier times perhaps more, since the development of the species – especially in the ‘social’ sense – grew from near that part of the planet. No-one should or would deny that. It is one of those mundane ‘facts’ which can’t be ignored. Just as the histories of societal development can’t be ignored in places like India or China, it has a long presence of existence.
      As mankind walked the earth, however, his societal development was impeded by various factors – usually related to survival. In the northern climates, it took most of a human’s efforts and time simply to prepare for winters which can take your breath away – and this most readily explains a slower development of those peoples and their societies. Yet what the Romans and others determined were Barbarians, were in fact societies of humans too. They had banded together in the need to help each other in that survival and gradually improve their circumstances – as had more southern peoples – but at a slower rate. There simply wasn’t the time to sit and contemplate all the wonders of the universe.
      Well … not quite the same way.
      And they ended up with a variety of ‘gods’ – as had the peoples of the Mediterranean zones, or India and China, before the ‘more advanced’ societies began to peg us with the ‘one god’ theory. And then, politics got into the act.
      Those road-building Romans helped advance progress of the northern ‘tribes’ and also the export of the one-god theory. I prefer to think the northern tribes picked one that worked best with a life-style necessary for the societal survival techniques they had learned … while at the same time picking the brains of the then-more advanced southern tribes … although there ARE still a lot of superstitions in the minds of humans.
      And that brings me to at least some of the differences now in the ‘one-god’ theories.
      It’s mind-boggling.
      There is nothing wrong with ‘moderation’ … in fact it’s what we strive for. And if we’re all going to believe the ‘one-god’ concept, then we should be allowing various ‘others’ to have their own thoughts on how it applies to their own lives – which DO vary as greatly as the minds which have different life-learning experiences as well as fragments of superstitions.
      If we could learn to move within each other’s societies without trying to change them or being made to feel we could not become a part of them for the benefits they all undoubtably have, there would probably be much less ‘type-casting’.
      Although there would still be the occasional ‘joke’ fired at any of us too … even friends do that, don’t they?
      The ‘political animals’ are the ones who place us at odds with one another – by using ‘religion’ and superstitious beliefs as a tool for hatred and oppression. If we don’t let them do that, it will be better for us all.
      I know it’s not good for my health to eat it every day … but I’m having bacon and eggs this morning. MY choice.
      Wish you a good day. 🙂

    2.  Avatar

      Antar I apologies as well if I am seen as that, Racist. But let me tell you first I am a million miles from that and I was also born in the ME and have nothing against THE PEOPLE in general or the Muslims , 70% out of  of my friends are Muslims.
      But what I am against is the leaders who have,  are and will always control the way people will live and want to live for what to make a lot of money and keep the others poor, in the dark and hungry. 

      If these leaders are for the people than let them choose in a REFERENDUM, not just the way a small group of people want.
      Is that not what the Arab Spring was all about…….? 

      On another subject what will happen to the Christians in those countries that are persecuted and  have no say on what happens in their life or religion, is that not racist. Can they not have a say in these countries.

      I will tell you a story, in a western country a group of Muslim women complained that they could not swim in a public pool because of western men and women swim in the same pool, so the council spent $30,000 to put a screen to make them happy and have that space  for them to swim in.     I not sure what that means is that not……….??   

      So again I apologies but the words are not directed to Muslims or the people.

      Good day to you.

  9. Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel Avatar
    Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel

    Oh great the Islamists won…….

  10. Oh great the Islamists won…….

  11. Oh great the Islamists won…….

Leave a Reply