Analysis: Saudi switch against Syria’s Assad is blow to Iran

Share:

Saudi Arabia, self-appointed guardian of Sunni Islam, is deeply wary of popular uprisings that have convulsed the Arab world, but it has lost patience with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s violent attempts to crush a mainly Sunni protest movement.

Saudi-Syrian relations were rarely warm, with Riyadh riled by Syria’s alliance with its Shi’ite regional rival Iran, and they chilled further after the 2005 assassination of Lebanese statesman Rafik al-Hariri, a friend of the Saudi royal family.

But until this week Saudi King Abdullah had kept silent on the violence in Syria, which human rights groups say has cost more than 1,600 civilian lives in five months of turmoil.

Now the Saudis have taken a stand, perhaps deciding that Syria’s diplomatic isolation and the bloodshed unleashed by its minority Alawite rulers on their majority Sunni opponents have made Damascus a ripe target of diplomatic opportunity.

“They realize the regime in Syria is facing a serious, nationwide, deep rebellion and is therefore vulnerable,” said Beirut-based Middle East analyst Rami Khouri.

The kingdom, which brooks no dissent at home and helped Bahrain crush Shi’ite-led protests in March, recalled its ambassador from Damascus on Monday and denounced the violence in Syria, which Assad blames on armed gangs with foreign backing.

The Saudi decision was announced in a statement in the name of King Abdullah, who warned Syria it faced ruin over the crackdown, among the bloodiest in Arab uprisings that have already brought down the rulers of Tunisia and Egypt.

Analysts suggested that Saudi Arabia sees in Assad’s woes a chance to strike a blow at Iran, even at the cost of undermining an established ruler, with a chance of chaos — or even representative government — in a nation at the heart of the Arab world.

“The benefits of hitting the Iranian connection outweigh the negatives of a new democracy in Syria,” should one emerge in a post-Assad Syria, Khouri said.

IMPACT ON THE STREET

The Saudi shift was prefigured in the regional political blocs over which the kingdom casts a long shadow, and mirrored by the countries and institutions for which its oil wealth and claim to religious rectitude are persuasive.

The Saudi-led Gulf Cooperation Council — which includes Bahrain — on Saturday expressed its “concern and regret” over Syria’s crackdown, echoing Western calls for political reform.

A day later, the Arab League, whose new head had visited Assad soon after taking office, called for an immediate halt to violence against demonstrators during military operations in Hama, Deir al-Zor and elsewhere in Syria.

The king’s warning to Syria, said one Saudi commentator, has paved the way for more states to pile pressure on Syria’s rulers while leaving some margin for them to avoid downfall.

“The statement wasn’t isolated from the worldwide movement to put pressure on the Syria regime. Saudi Arabia is important when it comes to future decisions, actions taken to pressure the regime,” said Jamal al-Khashoggi.

“For Saudi Arabia to come out criticizing the regime will no doubt have an impact on the Syrian street. It will fuel the tension, fuel the anger … It will create pressure on Syria to recognize its position for what it is.”

The move has had the immediate effect of cranking up the chorus of condemnation surrounding Syria, already facing sanctions from the United States and Europe.

Bahrain and Kuwait recalled their ambassadors from Damascus hours after the king’s message, and Sunni Islam’s most venerable institution of learning, al-Azhar in Cairo, called the Syrian assault on protesters an unacceptable “human tragedy.”

SECTARIAN RISKS

The latter voice echoes the Sunni bonds Saudi Arabia was invoking by moving against Syria during the holy Muslim month of Ramadan, on the heels of a tank assault against a rebellious, largely Sunni city, Hama, where Assad’s father killed thousands to put down an Islamist armed revolt in 1982.

The Assads’ Alawite sect is deemed heretical by Saudi Arabia’s austere brand of Sunni Islam.

Videos posted on YouTube after the king’s message appear to show Syrians in Saudi Arabia cheering the defense of his co-religionists in Syria.

“I don’t think it’s a coincidence that this happened during Ramadan,” said Gregory Gause, a political science professor at the University of Vermont.

“There is a heightened sense of the importance and role of religion, and people in Syria, an overwhelmingly Sunni country, were sure to read it in a sectarian way,” he said.

“They (the Saudis) increasingly see Iran and the Arab upheavals as requiring them to play their hole card: We’re Sunnis, they’re Shi’a, and there are more of us than there are of them.”

Msnbc, Reuters

Share:

Comments

16 responses to “Analysis: Saudi switch against Syria’s Assad is blow to Iran”

  1. Leborigine Avatar
    Leborigine

    It seems that syria and HA got involved in things way bigger than they can handle. Could they both be that stupid not to realise that killing al-marhoom Hariri that they would actually arise some sleeping giants?

  2.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    It seems that syria and HA got involved in things way bigger than they can handle. Could they both be that stupid not to realise that killing al-marhoom Hariri that they would actually arise some sleeping giants?

  3. RichardNYCT Avatar
    RichardNYCT

    The Saudis should realize “the regime in Syria is facing a serious, nationwide, deep rebellion and is therefore vulnerable” since they are most likely funding those radical elements in the population that are responsible for the harmful behavior that is tainting those who truly desire democratic reforms with their own blood in an attempt to gain an Islamic Theocracy. Let the Saudis and Iranians stop using Syria as their battleground for Shiite or Sunni superiority.

    In life, everything that goes around comes around. Let us see in a few years when the loyalty of the Saudi people themselves will no longer be bought with the patrimony of the monarch and those people demand democracy.

  4.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    The Saudis should realize “the regime in Syria is facing a serious, nationwide, deep rebellion and is therefore vulnerable” since they are most likely funding those radical elements in the population that are responsible for the harmful behavior that is tainting those who truly desire democratic reforms with their own blood in an attempt to gain an Islamic Theocracy. Let the Saudis and Iranians stop using Syria as their battleground for Shiite or Sunni superiority.

    In life, everything that goes around comes around. Let us see in a few years when the loyalty of the Saudi people themselves will no longer be bought with the patrimony of the monarch and those people demand democracy.

  5. leb_expatriate Avatar
    leb_expatriate

    It is about time you’ve spoken in regards to Syria king doofus.

    That’s right Shiites there are more of us than there are of you. You might have usurped power in Lebanon but the Sunnis are going to reclaim what is rightfully theirs in Syria.

    The new Middle East is going to look something like the following

    Shiites will dominate southern Iraq, Bahrain and will have a big say in Lebanon.

    We will see the independence of Kurdistan in northern Iraq and and north east Syria.

    The Sunni heartland of Iraq might opt to secede and join to the now Sunni dominated republic of Syria.

    Iran will be seething at the losses it has incurred. It will be left with little state-lets which it can influence. Little state-lets too many to say the least.  I say its only natural that the majority in the region contain the minority not the other way around.

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      Opinion from BBC …
      “To stand up and promote secular credentials will not be easy. Revolutionary socialism is no longer an ideology that might attract votes.
      Parties representing the left as a whole have never enjoyed broad support among Arabs, and those associated with business will have little appeal, given the tarnished reputations of wealthy tycoons adopted by the ruling cliques in Cairo, Damascus and elsewhere.But there appears to be at least one crumb of comfort for liberal and secular parties: the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the Nahda in Tunisia insist they are not seeking to dominate political life and envisage being partners in coalition government.The Brotherhood, for its part, plans to contest only half the seats in the Egyptian parliamentary elections. Perhaps these gestures reflect a genuine desire for political inclusivity. Or perhaps the Islamist groups fear the economic challenges ahead and want to duck exclusive blame for the expected hard times. Either way, it seems that secular parties are set to play a role of some kind in the immediate post-revolutionary period.But in the longer term, if these parties are to hold their ground they will need formulate an ideology that espouses democratic and liberal ideals, while accommodating the undoubted yearning of millions of Arabs for Islam’s role in society to be respected. Achieving such a balance will take time.In the short term, therefore, it would be surprising if the first free and fair elections in the Arab world did not see Islamist groups cashing in on the revolutions that were galvanised by motives unconnected to religion.”

      1.  Interesting. However, BBC is usually very far off when it covers stories of the the Middle East. Nahda and MB have already expressed their extreme views but publicaly they pretend to be ‘moderate’.  This has worked so well that other groups are also thinking of practicing this deception, including some of the MB’s most distinguished offspring: Hamas.
        It has already started with Tunisia and Egypt is next.  The MB not only has an ‘unofficial’ presidential candidate and much of parliament but had formed a broad coalition (yes even with secular and democratic parties) in hopes of still waging influence even if it did poorly in elections.

  6.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    It is about time you’ve spoken in regards to Syria king doofus.

    That’s right Shiites there are more of us than there are of you. You might have usurped power in Lebanon but the Sunnis are going to reclaim what is rightfully theirs in Syria.

    The new Middle East is going to look something like the following

    Shiites will dominate southern Iraq, Bahrain and will have a big say in Lebanon.

    We will see the independence of Kurdistan in northern Iraq and and north east Syria.

    The Sunni heartland of Iraq might opt to secede and join to the now Sunni dominated republic of Syria.

    Iran will be seething at the losses it has incurred. It will be left with little state-lets which it can influence. Little state-lets too many to say the least.  I say its only natural that the majority in the region contain the minority not the other way around.

    1.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      Opinion from BBC …
      “To stand up and promote secular credentials will not be easy. Revolutionary socialism is no longer an ideology that might attract votes.
      Parties representing the left as a whole have never enjoyed broad support among Arabs, and those associated with business will have little appeal, given the tarnished reputations of wealthy tycoons adopted by the ruling cliques in Cairo, Damascus and elsewhere.But there appears to be at least one crumb of comfort for liberal and secular parties: the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the Nahda in Tunisia insist they are not seeking to dominate political life and envisage being partners in coalition government.The Brotherhood, for its part, plans to contest only half the seats in the Egyptian parliamentary elections. Perhaps these gestures reflect a genuine desire for political inclusivity. Or perhaps the Islamist groups fear the economic challenges ahead and want to duck exclusive blame for the expected hard times. Either way, it seems that secular parties are set to play a role of some kind in the immediate post-revolutionary period.But in the longer term, if these parties are to hold their ground they will need formulate an ideology that espouses democratic and liberal ideals, while accommodating the undoubted yearning of millions of Arabs for Islam’s role in society to be respected. Achieving such a balance will take time.In the short term, therefore, it would be surprising if the first free and fair elections in the Arab world did not see Islamist groups cashing in on the revolutions that were galvanised by motives unconnected to religion.”

      1.  Interesting. However, BBC is usually very far off when it covers stories of the the Middle East. Nahda and MB have already expressed their extreme views but publicaly they pretend to be ‘moderate’.  This has worked so well that other groups are also thinking of practicing this deception, including some of the MB’s most distinguished offspring: Hamas.
        It has already started with Tunisia and Egypt is next.  The MB not only has an ‘unofficial’ presidential candidate and much of parliament but had formed a broad coalition (yes even with secular and democratic parties) in hopes of still waging influence even if it did poorly in elections.

  7.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    It is about time you’ve spoken in regards to Syria king doofus.

    That’s right Shiites there are more of us than there are of you. You might have usurped power in Lebanon but the Sunnis are going to reclaim what is rightfully theirs in Syria.

    The new Middle East is going to look something like the following

    Shiites will dominate southern Iraq, Bahrain and will have a big say in Lebanon.

    We will see the independence of Kurdistan in northern Iraq and and north east Syria.

    The Sunni heartland of Iraq might opt to secede and join to the now Sunni dominated republic of Syria.

    Iran will be seething at the losses it has incurred. It will be left with little state-lets which it can influence. Little state-lets too many to say the least.  I say its only natural that the majority in the region contain the minority not the other way around.

  8. antar2011 Avatar
    antar2011

    he looked quite p***d off on tv!

  9.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    he looked quite p***d off on tv!

  10.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    he looked quite p***d off on tv!

Leave a Reply