US sends messages to Syria, Congress with diplomacy

Share:

The Obama administration sent two distinct messages by dispatching the U.S. ambassador to Syria to meet anti-regime protesters in a besieged city. To Syrian President Bashar Assad: reform now. To domestic critics of its engagement policy: stop complaining.

Greeted by demonstrators with roses and cheers, the envoy, Robert Ford, on Friday finished a two-day trip to the restive city of Hama aimed at driving home the message that the United States stands with those in the Syrian streets braving a brutal government crackdown.

The visit prompted fierce reaction from the Syrian regime and a renewed American warning that Assad was failing to stabilize his country by satisfying the democratic yearnings of his people.

Ford “had a chance to talk to lots of average citizens — these were shopkeepers, people out on the street, young men,” reported Victoria Nuland, the State Department spokeswoman. “When he got into the city, the car was immediately surrounded by friendly protesters who were putting flowers on the windshield, they were putting olive branches on the car, they were chanting ‘Down with the regime!’ It was quite a scene.”

So far, the U.S. government has refused to call for the end to Assad family’s four-decade dynasty. The government’s harsh repression of dissent has escalated the crisis with protesters increasingly calling for Assad’s ouster after 11 years full of promises of democratic reform but little change from the iron-fisted rule of his father.

The Obama administration has been trapped between looking indecisive or looking weak. It has grown increasingly disgusted with the violence in Syria that has now claimed the lives of some1,600 people and 350 members of security forces, but has been unable to muster sufficient international outrage to secure either a U.N. condemnation of Assad’s government or a unified global demand that he step down.

And the administration can’t press too hard by itself because the threat of military action would not be taken seriously while it is trying to wind down wars in neighboring Iraq and in Afghanistan, and struggling to justify its participation in an international coalition against Moammar Gadhafi in Libya.

The solution has been to balance stinging criticism of the Assad regime’s conduct with continued pleas for it to lead a democratic transition. But the measured approach has been difficult to project amid clamoring at home and in Syria for even tougher action.

Ford’s place in the U.S. strategy has been most ambiguous. Unable to secure a Senate vote on his nomination, the administration sent him to Damascus in January when Congress was out of session as a limited-term recess appointment. The post had been left unfilled for the five previous years in protest of alleged Syrian involvement in the assassination of a Lebanese politician who had criticized Syrian domination of his country.

Republican members of Congress have vociferously challenged Ford’s continued presence in the country, calling it an unwarranted reward to Assad’s often pro-Iran and anti-U.S. government stance, and untenable in light of recent violence against civilians. And the administration itself has struggled for weeks to point to any concrete accomplishments under Ford’s tenure.

Ford’s participation in a Syrian government-organized trip to the country’s north last month did not help. The State Department said at the time that Ford’s outing to the abandoned town of Jisr al-Shughour allowed him to “see for himself the results of the Syrian government’s brutality.” However, he mostly encountered deserted streets and buildings that, in and of themselves, wouldn’t prove the existence of a foreign conspiracy to destabilize Syria, as the government claims, or mass atrocities, as Western governments and human rights groups allege.

Ford also has been rebuffed in several attempts to speak directly with senior Syrian officials.

“Any continued presence of a U.S. ambassador will either be used by the regime for propaganda purposes or just plain ignored,” Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen said last month. The Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said Ford’s participation in the government trip “compromised U.S. credibility with freedom and pro-democracy advocates within Syria.”

U.S. officials nevertheless insist that Ford is serving a vital role in making American concerns known to the Syrian government and providing assessments to policymakers back in Washington. Beyond that, he is providing moral support to protesters, officials say.

“A U.S. ambassador in Syria can send a very potent signal to the Syrian people by a visit to a place where they are simply trying to express their free will to demonstrate peacefully,” Nuland said Friday. “By standing with them, he was representing not only U.S. values, but also the importance of having an ambassador and an embassy in Damascus at this time.”

Ford’s trip — undertaken independently this time — allowed him to see firsthand the lies of the Syrian regime, Nuland told reporters. While the government blames foreign instigators or armed gangs for unrest, Ford “witnessed average Syrians asking for change in their country,” she said.

In recent days, Hama residents have largely sealed off their city, setting up makeshift checkpoints with burning tires and concrete blocks to keep security forces away. The government seized on Ford’s visit to insist that foreign conspirators lay behind the unrest and called it proof the U.S. was inciting violence in the Arab nation. The U.S. is trying to “aggravate the situations which destabilize Syria,” the state-run news agency said Friday.

Nuland called the claim “absolute rubbish.”

“The reason for his visit was to stand in solidarity with the right of the Syrian people to demonstrate peacefully,” she said, confirming that a video uplinked on YouTube was indeed of Ford’s car traveling through the Hama protesters.

Nuland also disputed the Syrian argument that Ford’s trip was unauthorized, explaining that the U.S. embassy informed the government of plans ahead of time. She noted that Syria’s ambassador to the United States can travel freely outside of Washington, and said Ford was allowed to pass through checkpoints run by the military and residents of Hama to reach the city Thursday.

“They really need to focus their attention on what their citizens have to say, rather than on spending their time picking at Ambassador Ford,” Nuland said, adding that it was “interesting that he had no difficulties with average Syrians in Hama — in fact, he was warmly welcomed.”

Ford left Hama during Friday prayers ahead of what are usually the week’s largest protests. He returned to Damascus safely Friday afternoon. He met France’s ambassador in Hama during his stay, but their trips to the city were coincidental and not planned in concert, Nuland said. AP

Share:

Comments

10 responses to “US sends messages to Syria, Congress with diplomacy”

  1. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    Another article to read and understand.

  2. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    Another article to read and understand.

  3.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Another article to read and understand.

  4. antar2011 Avatar
    antar2011

    well this certainly was a suprise after the quitening down in the last two weeks of US, France, Britain and Turkey.

    wonder how Asaad will react…later on…probably ask the ambassador to leave.

    on another note….althogh i understand the pple’s need for aid..any aid… to help them get rid of Assad…it was not easy to swallow seeing the pple of Hama cheering the US ambassador…this is just not right…*looking at the ailing Arab league*

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      As for being quiet, I think we have to understand the people of ‘western thought’ are listened to by their governments, which change through free elections, and they are getting tired of being castigated when their governments are doing or not doing – both at the same time usually – when they attempt to ‘help’ somewhere.
      The west has a lot of it’s own problems too, which are affecting things they care about more at the moment – jobs, the economy, the pollution, world food supply on an over-populated earth, the wild animals … or space-travel and our expected longevity in the evolving universe. Stuff like that. Difficult for most of them to imagine living under a dictator.
      And for the young people of Syria (or other Arab states) to see there IS at least recognition by the world at large of their problems and unjust treatment  – after months of a deadly struggle to be heard (which could not be done for Iranians, yet they were heard too)  – provides a huge relief for them, and I’m sure that’s the reason for the cheers. And, in a human sense, it IS right for them to cheer – as they realize their own suffering is actually working for them as ‘a people’.
      The despots hate this ‘ethernet’. I guess the world is opening up … I couldn’t have said this to you 25 years ago. 🙂

      1. syroman15 Avatar
        syroman15

        I believe this is the time for Syrians to be free to pursue”liberty and the pursuits there of”.  If the a***hole Assad is killed or captured so much the better.` I as a veteran salute the Syrian people for their bravery and pursuit of democracy as Americans did years ago……………….Zebra100

  5.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    well this certainly was a suprise after the quitening down in the last two weeks of US, France, Britain and Turkey.

    wonder how Asaad will react…later on.

    1.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      As for being quiet, I think we have to understand the people of ‘western thought’ are listened to by their governments, which change through free elections, and they are getting tired of being castigated when their governments are doing or not doing – both at the same time usually – when they attempt to ‘help’ somewhere.
      The west has a lot of it’s own problems too, which are affecting things they care about more at the moment – jobs, the economy, the pollution, world food supply on an over-populated earth, the wild animals … or space-travel and our expected longevity in the evolving universe. Stuff like that. Difficult for most of them to imagine living under a dictator.
      And for the young people of Syria (or other Arab states) to see there IS at least recognition by the world at large of their problems and unjust treatment  – after months of a deadly struggle to be heard (which could not be done for Iranians, yet they were heard too)  – provides a huge relief for them, and I’m sure that’s the reason for the cheers. And, in a human sense, it IS right for them to cheer – as they realize their own suffering is actually working for them as ‘a people’.
      The despots hate this ‘ethernet’. I guess the world is opening up … I couldn’t have said this to you 25 years ago. 🙂

      1.  Avatar
        Anonymous

        I believe this is the time for Syrians to be free to pursue”liberty and the pursuits there of”.  If the a***hole Assad is killed or captured so much the better.` I as a veteran salute the Syrian people for their bravery and pursuit of democracy as Americans did years ago……………….Zebra100

    2.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      As for being quiet, I think we have to understand the people of ‘western thought’ are listened to by their governments, which change through free elections, and they are getting tired of being castigated when their governments are doing or not doing – both at the same time usually – when they attempt to ‘help’ somewhere.
      The west has a lot of it’s own problems too, which are affecting things they care about more at the moment – jobs, the economy, the pollution, world food supply on an over-populated earth, the wild animals … or space-travel and our expected longevity in the evolving universe. Stuff like that. Difficult for most of them to imagine living under a dictator.
      And for the young people of Syria (or other Arab states) to see there IS at least recognition by the world at large of their problems and unjust treatment  – after months of a deadly struggle to be heard (which could not be done for Iranians, yet they were heard too)  – provides a huge relief for them, and I’m sure that’s the reason for the cheers. And, in a human sense, it IS right for them to cheer – as they realize their own suffering is actually working for them as ‘a people’.
      The despots hate this ‘ethernet’. I guess the world is opening up … I couldn’t have said this to you 25 years ago. 🙂

Leave a Reply