IAEA refers Syria to UN over ‘Nuclear reactor’

Share:

Syria suffered a fresh blow to its international reputation on Thursday when the UN nuclear watchdog voted to refer Damascus to the UN Security Council over allegations that it covertly built a nuclear reactor within its borders.

But while the vote by the board of governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency reflected strong western concern over Syria’s nuclear programme, Russia and China voted against the call for the council to debate censuring the Syrian regime.

The 35-nation IAEA board voted in favour of referring Syria to the Security Council, with 17 nations in favour and six – including Russia and China – against. Diplomats said that 11 countries abstained from the vote and one country was absent.

“Because of the Russian and Chinese votes, we can be quite sure that the [Security Council] in New York will refrain from censuring Syria because both those countries will veto such a move,” said a diplomat at the IAEA. “However, the US has managed to persuade the board to express concern over Syria’s reluctance to come clean over how it built such a reactor.”

Israel destroyed the desert site of the alleged reactor – near Deir Alzour in the country’s remote north-east – by bombing it in September 2007. US intelligence reports have said the facility was a nascent North Korean-designed reactor intended to produce plutonium for atomic bombs. Syria denies the charge, saying it was a conventional military site.

The IAEA gave independent backing to the US allegation in a report last month that said it was “very likely” to have been a reactor.

The IAEA began investigating the allegations in June 2008, but Syria has refused to co-operate with its investigation. Thursday’s motion was proposed by the US and its western allies, who had asked the IAEA’s governing body to find Syria in “non-compliance” with its international obligations.

Russia’s vote at the IAEA came as its diplomats strongly indicated their opposition to another vote on Syria at the UN – this time over its suppression of the uprising against Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

“Russia is against any UN Security Council resolution on Syria,” Alexander Lukashevich, Russian foreign ministry spokesman, told journalists at a briefing in Moscow.

“We do not believe the Syrian issue is a subject for consideration by the Security Council, let alone the adoption of some kind of resolution,” he said. “The situation in this country, in our view, does not present a threat to international peace and security.”

Britain, France, Germany and Portugal have floated a new resolution condemning Syria at the UN Security Council as the US and its allies seek to raise the pressure on Syria to end its violent crackdown on anti-government protesters. A vote is expected at the UN on either Friday or Monday.

FT

Share:

Comments

3 responses to “IAEA refers Syria to UN over ‘Nuclear reactor’”

  1. 316909 Avatar

    Tic toc tic toc tic toc…. Time is running out. Russia and China are only waiting to see what the EU and America offer them if they agree. Its only a matter of time. I personally thing that the veto is against all democratic reasoning and basically a vote witch passes by a majority should pass. That would also force rich nations to actually help smaller / poor nations because they will need them. The way it stands now large, strong nations with veto power basically bully little nations into doing what they want. Either way once a Government in exile is announced or the revolt actually get support by a high ranking general and they control an area then declare a new government (like Libya did) the EU and U.S will no longer need the U.N and can basically just recognize the new government and support it. If that fails to happen Insurgents from Iraq will cross into Syria and a Sunni Shia war will start witch will end in victory for the huge sunni majority.  

  2.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Tic toc tic toc tic toc…. Time is running out. Russia and China are only waiting to see what the EU and America offer them if they agree. Its only a matter of time. I personally thing that the veto is against all democratic reasoning and basically a vote witch passes by a majority should pass. That would also force rich nations to actually help smaller / poor nations because they will need them. The way it stands now large, strong nations with veto power basically bully little nations into doing what they want. Either way once a Government in exile is announced or the revolt actually get support by a high ranking general and they control an area then declare a new government (like Libya did) the EU and U.S will no longer need the U.N and can basically just recognize the new government and support it. If that fails to happen Insurgents from Iraq will cross into Syria and a Sunni Shia war will start witch will end in victory for the huge sunni majority.  

  3. Wow, amazing weblog format! How long have you
    been running a blog for? you made running a blog glance easy.
    The entire glance of your website is magnificent,
    let alone the content! You can see similar here e-commerce

Leave a Reply