Wikileaks cable: Iran Telecom is taking over the country

Share:

A classified cable published by WikiLeaks reveals that the Government of Lebanon told U.S. diplomats in 2008 that “Iran Telecom is taking over the country!”

This took place less than a month before Hezbollah took over Beirut in May 2008 and tried but failed to take over Mt Lebanon .

The uncovering of the network and the demand to shut it down was the main reasons behind the May 2008 attack by Hezbollah.

The US ambassador to Lebanon on Monday condemned the release of diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks as “illegal and irresponsible,” saying they only increased tensions in the turbulent country.

“As a matter of policy we don’t comment on documents that purport to contain classified information, but we would condemn in the strongest possible terms the deliberate and unauthorized disclosure of any classified materials,” Ambassador Maura Connelly said after meeting Prime Minister Saad Hariri.

“Illegal and irresponsible releases like those made by WikiLeaks serve those who want to increase tensions and settle political scores through inaccurate, out-of-context, and deliberate misinterpretations of material that is claimed to be authentic, but cannot be verified.”

Former Communications Minister MP Marwan Hamadeh denied the Wikileaks report and described it as “a story full of slanders and fabrications” .

Here is the cable

Wednesday, 16 April 2008, 16:42

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 04 BEIRUT 000523

SIPDIS

NOFORN

SIPDIS

NSC FOR ABRAMS/SINGH/YERGER, STATE FOR NEA/ELA,

EO 12958 DECL: 04/16/2018

TAGS PTER, ECPS, PINR, LE, IR, SY

SUBJECT: LEBANON: HIZBALLAH GOES FIBER OPTIC

REF: BEIRUT 490

Classified By: Charge d’Affaires Michele Sison for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

SUMMARY

1. (S) Requesting a special meeting with Charge, Telecommunications Minister Marwan Hamadeh decried the establishment of a complete fiber optics network by Hizballah throughout Lebanon. The GOL has been sharing this information widely among friends of Lebanon, to include the governments of France, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and the UAE. Hamadeh sees only two choices for the GOL: approach the UN Security Council, or use the “cover” of March 14-friendly municipalities to cut the lines. However, he questioned whether the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and the Internal Security Forces (ISF) have the “guts” to do so, given that Hizballah already stated to Lebanese security officials that it would view this as equal to an Israeli act of aggression, and would then take action against the GOL. Hamadeh hopes that Saad Hariri, now in Geneva, will return soon to Lebanon so that March 14 can meet to formulate a strategy. End summary.

GOL HAS BEEN SHARING HIZBALLAH FIBER OPTIC MAP, REPORT WIDELY

————-

2. (S) &Iran Telecom is taking over the country!8 were the first words out of the mouth of Minister of Telecommunications Marwan Hamadeh when he met with Charge and Econoff on April 16. He was referring to the discovery of a complete fiber optic system (FiOS) installed by Hizballah throughout Lebanon – reftel. In addition, Hizballah has introduced Wi-Max in Beirut’s southern suburbs. Hamadeh pointed out that although Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation (LBC) television had run a story the previous night about the Hizballah FiOS network, it was already widely known. The LBC story was not planted by the GOL, nor planned, but in Hamadeh’s opinion it was no bad thing to get the story out there. Hamadeh himself has been sharing the news both within the GOL and outside, with &friends,8 which includes the Arab countries, the U.S., France (Sarkozy was &stunned”) and Terje Roed-Larsen of the UN. He briefed Bernard Kouchner, Jean-David Levitte, Boris Bouillon and Michel Barnier while in Paris. In Beirut he spoke to Charge Andre Parent of France and Ambassador Abdul Aziz Khoja of Saudi Arabia. Saad Hariri, when he heard, sent a private plane from Saudi Arabia to pick up a copy of the map, which traces in detail the route of the system, to share with Saudi King Abdullah and Intelligence Chief Prince Mukrin bin Abdul-Aziz. PM Siniora briefed the Jordanians and Emiratis, as well as Arab League SYG Amr Musa on the network during his recent trip around the region, Hamadeh confirmed. Within Lebanon Hamadeh says that the first person he told, after the Prime Minister and Druze leader Walid Jumblatt was Maronite Patriarch Sfeir. Hamadeh described the strategic implications of the Hizballah plan, which he says is targeting the Christian areas, despite a denial of that by Hizballah. In addition to Hamadeh and PM Siniora, Druze leader Walid Jumblatt and Defense Minister Michel Murr have been active in the GL information campaign on the network.

INTERFERENCE IN TELECOMS LINKED TO NETWORK

—————–

3. (S) While the confrontation over the FiOS system was taking place with Hizballah, mobile telecommunications were being subject to interference by Syria in the north, Israel in the south and possibly by the UN at sea, according to Hamadeh. The information about Israeli interference was passed &unofficially8 by UNIFIL, since, in a recurring complaint by Hamadeh during the conversation, the LAF has not reported any problems officially. The Syrian interference is similar to that occurring during the Nahr al-Barid fighting, and highlights the ability of the Syrians to communicate within Lebanon through non-Lebanese mobile systems. Because the system in the part of Syria bordering on northern Lebanon is a private company, MTM, Hamadeh believes that they offer political cover to the Syrian government, who he nevertheless believes is behind the problem. Hamadeh views these events as part of the same strategic interference in Lebanon, both internally and externally. Hamadeh has a map that delineates

BEIRUT 00000523 002 OF 004

the interference, in an arc that runs from the north to the south of Lebanon.

MARCH 14 NEEDS TO MEET, BUT SAAD SHOULD BE THERE

————————

4. (S) Hamadeh said that he, the Prime Minister and Minister of Defense Elias Murr are all danger, but he and Murr will take the biggest risk in exposing the Hizballah FiOS network. Hamadeh told the PM that he could not assume the risk alone for a showdown with Hizballah. He also used the risk of physical harm as a deterrent with Jumblatt, who wanted to hold a press conference to expose the Hizballah system. Hamadeh believes that this is a March 14 issue, and cannot be resolved without the participation of Saad Hariri. Hamadeh complained that there has not yet been either a March 14 meeting or a cabinet meeting to discuss this matter. He says he asked for such discussions in a meeting with PM Siniora April 15, and will raise it again when they meet April 16. Hamadeh also discussed the issue with Larsen, whom he met with recently in Paris, although he did not give Larsen the map. If the GOL decides to raise the issue with the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) he will then provide the map, said Hamadeh.

HIZBALLAH RESPONSE – DON’T TOUCH!

————–

5. (S) Hamadeh reported that LAF G-2 Brigadier General Georges Khoury and ISF Major General Ashraf Rifi saw Wafiq Safa, the Hizballah liaison to the Lebanese intelligence services, together. Khoury asked Safa to take down two parts of the network as a first step; Safa refused. Safa stated that the network is part of Hizballah’s ability to defend Lebanon, and that Hizballah would regard any attack on the network as an act of aggression. However, PM Siniora only got a written report from Khoury ten days after the meeting, Hamadeh complained. Even then, the report was unsigned and thus returned to Khoury for signature. According to their report, Hizballah argued that the PM, Hamadeh and Murr are only raising the issue of the FiOS system in order to bring up the issue of Hizballah weapons. Safa stated categorically that the FiOS system is not up for discussion because it is a key part of the Hizballah arsenal. Safa freely acknowledged to Rifi and Khoury that the network exists. It could only be discussed as part of a defense strategy, he said, adding that the network has no commercial or trade implications. He maintained that it does not penetrate the Christian areas.

HIZBALLAH ASSERTIONS UNTRUE

—————–

6. (S) Hamadeh believes both Hizballah assertions to be untrue. He refutes the Hizballah claim that the system exists solely to give them defensive communications throughout the country, saying that there are &centrales8 or hubs in many villages along the route, and no doubt these have lines running off to other villages and residences. He also believes that Hizballah crews are only waiting for the snows in the Christian regions of Metn and Kswaran to melt before completing penetration of these regions from the east.

WORK DONE UNDER VARIOUS FORMS OF COVER

—————–

7. (S) To complete the installations and at the same time stay below the radar, Hamadeh says that Hizballah has used the municipalities to issue local permits. For example, in Sidon they are working under the cover provided by Abdel Rahman Bizri, the mayor. In another case the Ministry of Energy issued a permit for work that was &to reinforce energy lines,8 although Hamadeh says that was clearly not true. Hamadeh says that the whole of the Bekaa valley was done with local permits, and installations were done by different groups, each unaware of what the others were doing. However, he also says that some of the work was done with the knowledge of resigned Minister of Energy Fneish, a Hizballah member.

DISCOVERY AND REPORT

——————–

8. (S) The first official report was from the region of

BEIRUT 00000523 003 OF 004

Chouifat, which reported installation of an unknown fiber optic system, and asked the Minister of the Interior to stop it. No one did anything because, in Hamadeh’s opinion, they &had no guts.8 At the time of the earlier exposure of the Hizballah telephone lines running through Beirut, and even along the wall of the French embassy, the GOL asked Hizballah to remove those lines, which Hizballah did, and Hamadeh said that he believed at the time that would be the end of the network in the south. The full Ministry of Telecommunications report on the system was compiled by engineers in the ministry and othersXXXXXXXXXXXX who Hamadeh believes could be in great danger because of the report. Once again Hamadeh pointed out that there were no official reports yet from ISF Major General Rifi or LAF G-2 Brigadier General Khoury.

FUNDING FROM IRAN

—————–

9. (S) The current installations, as per the map Hamadeh has given us, shows lines running from Beirut, around both sides of the airport, into the south below the Litani and back up through the Bekaa valley to the far north. It covers the Palestinian camps, and the Hizballah training camps in the Bekaa, and is penetrating deep into the Christian Metn and Ksarwan areas. Although Hamadeh says he has &a few names,8 he did not list the companies who are responsible for the installation, but said that information would be made available shortly. He cited the Iranian Fund for the Reconstruction of Lebanon as the source of the funding. This same group has been rebuilding roads and bridges since the July 2006 war with Israel, and has been accused before of installing telecommunications lines in parallel with new roads. Hamadeh said that he wants to get the list of companies involved and black list them with the GOL.

STRATEGIC VICTORY

—————–

10. (S) Hamadeh highlights the system as a strategic victory for Iran, since it creates an important Iranian outpost in Lebanon, bypassing Syria. He sees the value for the Iranians as strategic, rather than technical or economic. The value for Hizballah is the final step in creating a nation state. Hizballah now has an army and weapons; a television station; an education system; hospitals; social services; a financial system; and a telecommunications system. As a sign of its confidence Hizballah official Safa told Khoury and Rifi that any move against the FiOS system would be taken as &an Israeli attack8 and dealt with accordingly. When Khoury and Rifi pointed out that the people in the area might not accept this and might show hostility to Hizballah in this case, Safa replied, &We don’t care; we will accept hostile reactions.8 At that point, according to Hamadeh, the GOL decided it needed to inform its friends and make a decision on the next steps to be taken.

HAMADEH PREPARES INTERNAL CAMPAIGN

—————–

11. (S) Meanwhile, Hamadeh is preparing a &very strong8 internal campaign. This campaign, he said, has the potential to &destroy8 Aoun and mobilize Christians, as well as influence those Shia who are already beginning to worry about Hizballah. He is waiting for a March 14 meeting to discuss this campaign. Saad has apparently traveled to London and Geneva this week, and is expected to be back in Riyadh by 4/20. Saad has been out of Lebanon for some several weeks and it is not known when he will return. Hamadeh sees only two choices for the GOL: approach the UN Security Council directly, or take on Hizballah by cutting lines. But do the Lebanese security forces have the “guts” for that, or are they frightened by Safa’s statement that those actions would be considered an act of aggression, he wonders.

12. (S) Comment: Last year, when Hamadeh’s telecommunications ministry “discovered” the well-known Hizballah telephone system, including the line strung along the wall of the French embassy, he maintained that the GOL would not tolerate the erosion of its “last monopoly” by Hizballah, However, aside from the ceremonial cutting of the French embassy line, there was no further action. This time around, it appears that by sharing as widely as possible the details of the plan, the GOL may hope that someone else will take on the challenge. End comment.

BEIRUT 00000523 004 OF 004

SISON

Guardian

Share:

Comments

27 responses to “Wikileaks cable: Iran Telecom is taking over the country”

  1. Hannibal Avatar

    A state within a state is no country…

    1. NAGDELLA Avatar

      I hope you’re not referring to Lebanon as a “country”..
      President: Maronite
      Prime Minister: Sunni
      Speaker: Shia

      State within a state or states within a state?

      1. Hannibal Avatar

        For once I do agree with you 😛 LOL
        OK States within a state…
        I still believe though that drastically changing to a secular system will not work. We need a buffer period whereby ALL the sects rotate the offices. I think in such a scenario confidence will be built and the feudal system would cease.

        1. PROPHET.T Avatar

          Hannibal,Rotating offices among Lebanon’s various sects may be a good idea, only, and only if it is coupled with a roadmap to a more democratic system. A road map that would outline the changes needed for our election system, justice system, employment practices and so on.Rotating is a short term solution, if put in practice, can easily be manipulated and abused by Lebanese leaders and sects.
          I still prefer a system where the office of the president is still held by a maronite where he is elected directly by the public. I also advocate giving the president more power than he enjoys now. I can understand your fears that non Christians will decide who the president is (it is happening now anyway). Initially , it may be true, but with other changes to the electoral system, non sectarian political parties would emerge, and play an important role in alliances among other parties.You can still rotate other offices while reforms are being made. Reforms require determination, laws, and will, but more importantly, a roadmap with a time table.It will take time to teach the public democratic principles.It will take time to convince religion institutions to stick to what they are supposed to do.This might be the hardest one to achieve.This might give people like you and me a chance to start a non sectarian movement that can grow, and become effective, lol

        2. PROPHET.T Avatar

          Hannibal,Rotating offices among Lebanon’s various sects may be a good idea, only, and only if it is coupled with a roadmap to a more democratic system. A road map that would outline the changes needed for our election system, justice system, employment practices and so on.Rotating is a short term solution, if put in practice, can easily be manipulated and abused by Lebanese leaders and sects.
          I still prefer a system where the office of the president is still held by a maronite where he is elected directly by the public. I also advocate giving the president more power than he enjoys now. I can understand your fears that non Christians will decide who the president is (it is happening now anyway). Initially , it may be true, but with other changes to the electoral system, non sectarian political parties would emerge, and play an important role in alliances among other parties.You can still rotate other offices while reforms are being made. Reforms require determination, laws, and will, but more importantly, a roadmap with a time table.It will take time to teach the public democratic principles.It will take time to convince religion institutions to stick to what they are supposed to do.This might be the hardest one to achieve.This might give people like you and me a chance to start a non sectarian movement that can grow, and become effective, lol

        3. PROPHET.T Avatar

          If I may add one more thing. A strong atheist president might still be a good idea during the transition period, lol

        4. PROPHET.T Avatar

          If I may add one more thing. A strong atheist president might still be a good idea during the transition period, lol

  2. Hannibal Avatar

    A state within a state is no country…

    1. NAGDELLA Avatar

      I hope you’re not referring to Lebanon as a “country”..
      President: Maronite
      Prime Minister: Sunni
      Speaker: Shia

      State within a state or states within a state?

  3. A state within a state is no country…

  4. A state within a state is no country…

    1.  Avatar

      I hope you’re not referring to Lebanon as a “country”..
      President: Maronite
      Prime Minister: Sunni
      Speaker: Shia

      State within a state or states within a state?

      1. For once I do agree with you 😛 LOL
        OK States within a state…
        I still believe though that drastically changing to a secular system will not work. We need a buffer period whereby ALL the sects rotate the offices. I think in such a scenario confidence will be built and the feudal system would cease.

        1. PROPHET.T Avatar

          Hannibal,Rotating offices among Lebanon’s various sects may be a good idea, only, and only if it is coupled with a roadmap to a more democratic system. A road map that would outline the changes needed for our election system, justice system, employment practices and so on.Rotating is a short term solution, if put in practice, can easily be manipulated and abused by Lebanese leaders and sects. I still prefer a system where the office of the president is still held by a maronite where he is elected directly by the public. I also advocate giving the president more power than he enjoys now. I can understand your fears that non Christians will decide who the president is (it is happening now anyway). Initially , it may be true, but with other changes to the electoral system, non sectarian political parties would emerge, and play an important role in alliances among other parties.You can still rotate other offices while reforms are being made. Reforms require determination, laws, and will, but more importantly, a roadmap with time table.It will take time to teach the public democratic principles that are not controlled by religion institutions.This might give you and me a chance to start a non sectarian movement that can grow, and become effective, lol

        2. PROPHET.T Avatar

          If I may add one more thing. An atheist might still be a good idea during the transition period, lol

  5. PROPHET.T Avatar

    US embassy cables: Saudi Arabia urges US and NATO to invade Lebanon.

    guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 7 December 2010 21.30 GMT
    Wednesday, 14 May 2008, 09:24
    S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 RIYADH 000768
    SIPDIS
    EO 12958 DECL: 05/12/2018
    TAGS IR, IS, IZ, LE, MASS, MCAP, MNUC, MOPS, PGOV, PINR,
    PREL, SA
    SUBJECT: LEBANON: SAG FM SAYS UN PEACE KEEPING FORCE NEEDED
    NOW
    Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Michael Gfoeller for reasons 1.4
    (b) and (d)
    1. (S) SUMMARY. S/I Ambassador David Satterfield and an MNF-I/Embassy Baghdad team met with SAG Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal on May 10. While Iraq was the main topic discussed, Saud brought up events taking place in Beirut and emphasized the need for a “security response” to Hizballah,s “military challenge to the Government of Lebanon.” Specifically, Saud argued for an “Arab force” to create and maintain order in and around Beirut, which would be assisted in its efforts and come under the “cover” of a deployment of UNIFIL troops from south Lebanon. The US and NATO would need to provide movement and logistic support, as well as “naval and air cover.” Saud said that a Hizballah victory in Beirut would mean the end of the Siniora government and the “Iranian takeover” of Lebanon. END SUMMARY.
    Lebanon: A “Military” Problem with a Military Solution
    ——————————————— ———
    2. (S) Opening a discussion with S/I Satterfield focused largely on Iraq, Saud first turned to Lebanon and stated that the effort by “Hizballah and Iran” to take over Beirut was the first step in a process that would lead to the overthrow of the Siniora government and an “Iranian takeover of all Lebanon.” Such a victory, combined with Iranian actions in Iraq and on the Palestinian front, would be a disaster for the US and the entire region. Saud argued that the present situation in Beirut was “entirely military” and that the solution must be military as well. The Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) were too fragile to bear more pressure; they needed urgent backing to secure Beirut from Hizballah’s assault. What was needed was an “Arab force” drawn from Arab “periphery” states to deploy to Beirut under the “cover of the UN” and with a significant presence drawn from UNIFIL in south Lebanon “which is sitting doing nothing.” The US and NATO would be asked to provide equipment for such a force as well as logistics, movement support, and “naval and air cover.”
    3. (S) Satterfield asked what support this concept had from Siniora and from other Arab states. Saud responded that “Siniora strongly supports,” but that only Jordan and Egypt “as well as Arab League SYG Moussa” were aware of the proposal, lest premature surfacing result in its demise. No contacts had been made with Syria on any Beirut developments, Saud said, adding, “what would be the use?”
    An “Easier Battle to Win”
    ————————-
    4. (S) Saud said that of all the regional fronts on which Iran was now advancing, the battle in Lebanon to secure peace would be an “easier battle to win” (than Iraq or on the Palestinian front). Satterfield said that the “political and military” feasibility of the undertaking Saud had outlined would appear very much open to question. In particular, attempting to establish a new mandate for UNIFIL would be very problematic. Satterfield said the US would carefully
    RIYADH 00000768 002 OF 002
    study any Arab decision on a way forward. Saud concluded by underscoring that a UN/Arab peace-keeping force coupled with US air and naval support would “keep out Hezbollah forever” in Lebanon.
    5. (U) Ambassador Satterfield has cleared this cable. FRAKER

    1. Thank you Wikileak for proving how dumb the Lebanese and the Arab governments are …. As I read more WikiLeak cables I get more conversed that the only semi smart person in Lebanon is H. Nassralla even though I disagree with some of his actions. The Arab countries come crying to some low level US diplomats like my kids used to do. Grow up Arabs and grow some balls. The Saniora government was a disgrace for all the Lebanese. I encourage everyone to read all the cables that came from Beirut and you’ll see how childish are the Lebanese leaders from Junblatt to Murr to Saniora and on.

  6. PROPHET.T Avatar

    US embassy cables: Saudi Arabia urges US and NATO to invade Lebanon.

    guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 7 December 2010 21.30 GMT
    Wednesday, 14 May 2008, 09:24
    S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 RIYADH 000768
    SIPDIS
    EO 12958 DECL: 05/12/2018
    TAGS IR, IS, IZ, LE, MASS, MCAP, MNUC, MOPS, PGOV, PINR,
    PREL, SA
    SUBJECT: LEBANON: SAG FM SAYS UN PEACE KEEPING FORCE NEEDED
    NOW
    Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Michael Gfoeller for reasons 1.4
    (b) and (d)
    1. (S) SUMMARY. S/I Ambassador David Satterfield and an MNF-I/Embassy Baghdad team met with SAG Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal on May 10. While Iraq was the main topic discussed, Saud brought up events taking place in Beirut and emphasized the need for a “security response” to Hizballah,s “military challenge to the Government of Lebanon.” Specifically, Saud argued for an “Arab force” to create and maintain order in and around Beirut, which would be assisted in its efforts and come under the “cover” of a deployment of UNIFIL troops from south Lebanon. The US and NATO would need to provide movement and logistic support, as well as “naval and air cover.” Saud said that a Hizballah victory in Beirut would mean the end of the Siniora government and the “Iranian takeover” of Lebanon. END SUMMARY.
    Lebanon: A “Military” Problem with a Military Solution
    ——————————————— ———
    2. (S) Opening a discussion with S/I Satterfield focused largely on Iraq, Saud first turned to Lebanon and stated that the effort by “Hizballah and Iran” to take over Beirut was the first step in a process that would lead to the overthrow of the Siniora government and an “Iranian takeover of all Lebanon.” Such a victory, combined with Iranian actions in Iraq and on the Palestinian front, would be a disaster for the US and the entire region. Saud argued that the present situation in Beirut was “entirely military” and that the solution must be military as well. The Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) were too fragile to bear more pressure; they needed urgent backing to secure Beirut from Hizballah’s assault. What was needed was an “Arab force” drawn from Arab “periphery” states to deploy to Beirut under the “cover of the UN” and with a significant presence drawn from UNIFIL in south Lebanon “which is sitting doing nothing.” The US and NATO would be asked to provide equipment for such a force as well as logistics, movement support, and “naval and air cover.”
    3. (S) Satterfield asked what support this concept had from Siniora and from other Arab states. Saud responded that “Siniora strongly supports,” but that only Jordan and Egypt “as well as Arab League SYG Moussa” were aware of the proposal, lest premature surfacing result in its demise. No contacts had been made with Syria on any Beirut developments, Saud said, adding, “what would be the use?”
    An “Easier Battle to Win”
    ————————-
    4. (S) Saud said that of all the regional fronts on which Iran was now advancing, the battle in Lebanon to secure peace would be an “easier battle to win” (than Iraq or on the Palestinian front). Satterfield said that the “political and military” feasibility of the undertaking Saud had outlined would appear very much open to question. In particular, attempting to establish a new mandate for UNIFIL would be very problematic. Satterfield said the US would carefully
    RIYADH 00000768 002 OF 002
    study any Arab decision on a way forward. Saud concluded by underscoring that a UN/Arab peace-keeping force coupled with US air and naval support would “keep out Hezbollah forever” in Lebanon.
    5. (U) Ambassador Satterfield has cleared this cable. FRAKER

    1.  Avatar

      Thank you Wikileak for proving how dumb the Lebanese and the Arab governments are …. As I read more WikiLeak cables I get more conversed that the only semi smart person in Lebanon is H. Nassralla even though I disagree with some of his actions. The Arab countries come crying to some low level US diplomats like my kids used to do. Grow up Arabs and grow some balls. The Saniora government was a disgrace for all the Lebanese. I encourage everyone to read all the cables that came from Beirut and you’ll see how childish are the Lebanese leaders from Junblatt to Murr to Saniora and on.

  7. PROPHET.T Avatar

    I bet many people would have loved to see the Saudi elite forces taking on HA fighters. What makes them think they’d do better then the Israelis? lol

  8. PROPHET.T Avatar

    I bet many people would have loved to see the Saudi elite forces taking on HA fighters. What makes them think they’d do better then the Israelis? lol

  9. PROPHET.T Avatar

    I bet many people would have loved to see the Saudi elite forces taking on HA fighters. What makes them think they’d do better then the Israelis? lol

  10. PROPHET.T Avatar

    I bet many people would have loved to see the Saudi elite forces taking on HA fighters. What makes them think they’d do better then the Israelis? lol

  11. Wow, awesome blog layout! How lengthy have you been running a blog
    for? you make blogging look easy. The full glance
    of your website is wonderful, as smartly as the content material!
    You can see similar here sklep internetowy

  12. Its like you read my mind! You appear to know a lot
    about this, like you wrote the book in it or something.
    I think that you can do with some pics to drive the message home a little bit, but
    instead of that, this is wonderful blog.

    A fantastic read. I will definitely be back. I saw similar here: Ecommerce

  13. Superb blog you have here but I was curious if you knew of any forums that cover
    the same topics discussed in this article? I’d really like to be a part of community where
    I can get comments from other knowledgeable individuals that share the
    same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know.
    Bless you! I saw similar here: Dobry sklep

  14. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied
    on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us
    something enlightening to read? I saw similar here: Ecommerce

Leave a Reply