Odierno says Iran is funding extremists in Iraq

Share:

The commander of U.S. forces in Iraq says Iran is fueling instability in neighboring Iraq by funding and training Shi’ite extremist groups in the country.

General Ray Odierno told CNN on Sunday that Iran does not want Iraq to become a strong democratic country. He said Iran would rather see Iraq become a “weak governmental institution.”

Odierno also said it would take a “complete failure” of Iraq’s security forces for the U.S. to resume combat operations there. He said Iraqi forces have done so well for so long that he finds their failure unlikely.

Meanwhile, the U.S. military says an American soldier was killed in southern Iraq’s Basra province on Sunday.

The soldier was the first fatality among U.S. troops in Iraq since the last American combat brigade left the country last Thursday.

Smaller U.S. combat units remain in Iraq but are scheduled to leave by the end of this month.

About 50,000 U.S. troops will stay in Iraq until the end of 2011 as a stability force.

Their focus will be training Iraqi soldiers and performing counter-terrorism operations, but they will be fully capable of fighting if they are attacked or if Iraqi forces need help.

More than 4,400 U.S. military personnel have been killed in Iraq since war began in March 2003 with a U.S.-led invasion that eventually toppled Iraq’s Saddam Hussein.

Late Saturday, Iraqi police in the city of Nasiriya used water cannon to disperse stone-throwing demonstrators angry about severe shortages of electricity.

Officials say at least nine protesters and six police were hurt in the clashes.

Public anger at power shortages has increased in June, July and August as summer temperatures regularly reach 50 degrees Celsius.

Violent protests in Nasiriya and Basra in June left two protesters dead and wounded a number of police and civilians. VOA

Share:

Comments

26 responses to “Odierno says Iran is funding extremists in Iraq”

  1. If only this would happen in Irak…

  2. what about the US and israel? with all due honesty, under Saddam (MHRIP) iraqi women at least had their rights and could walk safe at night. the kurds, shiite, sunis were all living fine.

    if the idiot and his sons werent such lunatics, the people might have actually defended him when the US came barging in.

    well aint karma a witch.

    1. “under Saddam (MHRIP) iraqi women at least had their rights and could walk safe at night. the kurds, shiite, sunis were all living fine”

      you must have be living in lala land.

    2. “under Saddam (MHRIP) iraqi women at least had their rights and could walk safe at night. the kurds, shiite, sunis were all living fine”

      you must have be living in lala land.

  3. Tarie Al Fanarie Avatar
    Tarie Al Fanarie

    Iran is been doing that all along. Everyone can and easily accuse the US of aggressions. But when Iran is doing it between iraqis its ok its not considered aggression i suppose. Accuse the US all you like but Syria and Iran are not acting in the best interest of the Iraqi people. They pit them against each other. Even Iran helps Al Qaada and train them to kill Shiites in order to fuel further the shiites-sunnis strife. those who say Iran would not gain anything from it is either naive or ignorant. WHy wouldn’t iran get the shiites also to overrun the Sunnis and take over the Oil fields? Especially now if US forces withdrew out of site. Then Iran will have no use of the Sunnis who attack these forces and they could careless if shiites overrun the sunnis. Its time to blow Iran into pieces..

  4. tarie i laugh at your posts at times. do you really think before you type? do you think the US is acting in iraq’s best interest? bush has signed an agreement in iraq that allows americans to do business in iraq like iraqis.

    you really talk out of your bung hole at times.

    iran and syria came in after saddam was ousted to protect their interests from what the US is trying to destroy.

    you’re really very naiive at times. you have no idea of the damage the US has done to iraq and how much of this is israel’s great plan of establishing the greater map of israel.

    1. Tarie Al Fanarie Avatar
      Tarie Al Fanarie

      No Tony I never said the US is thinking of Iraqis interest. But at least those nations who claims the US being the aggressor are no different than the US…

      1. true but always look at who opened the door man. its all i’m saying.

        when saddam was in power, iran and syria couldnt get in could they?

        as soon as saddam was changing all oil transactions into euro, they moved in quickly cos that would have beeen the end of the US. their CIA agent defected so he had to be removed.

      2. true but always look at who opened the door man. its all i’m saying.

        when saddam was in power, iran and syria couldnt get in could they?

        as soon as saddam was changing all oil transactions into euro, they moved in quickly cos that would have beeen the end of the US. their CIA agent defected so he had to be removed.

      3. Prophet Avatar

        Tarie, do you remember in 2003 when Bush and Rumsfeld were saying Syria and Iran were next? What makes you think that Iran and Syria were going to make Bush’s life easy in Iraq? Had Bush had it easy in Iraq, the US most likely would have attack Iran or Syria or both. Yes Dirty politics cost many lives. But Nations look for survival at any cost. National interests are always priorities for countries that respect themselves. I wish one day we have a nation that respects its people and its interests.

      4. Prophet Avatar

        Tarie, do you remember in 2003 when Bush and Rumsfeld were saying Syria and Iran were next? What makes you think that Iran and Syria were going to make Bush’s life easy in Iraq? Had Bush had it easy in Iraq, the US most likely would have attack Iran or Syria or both. Yes Dirty politics cost many lives. But Nations look for survival at any cost. National interests are always priorities for countries that respect themselves. I wish one day we have a nation that respects its people and its interests.

  5. tarie i laugh at your posts at times. do you really think before you type? do you think the US is acting in iraq’s best interest? bush has signed an agreement in iraq that allows americans to do business in iraq like iraqis.

    you really talk out of your bung hole at times.

    iran and syria came in after saddam was ousted to protect their interests from what the US is trying to destroy.

    you’re really very naiive at times. you have no idea of the damage the US has done to iraq and how much of this is israel’s great plan of establishing the greater map of israel.

  6. about iran help al-qaada ano mab5abrak ade 3am bed7ak hala2 qaada has been created by the US in 1979 to fight soviet troops ano shu 5as toz b mar7aba iran support mahdi army im with you but al-qaada go kill urself

  7. Tarie Al Fanarie Avatar
    Tarie Al Fanarie

    Tony now you’re contradicting what you say before. You won’t to forget the past but this timeyou won’t. We all know the US do not care about Iraq. But we don’t expect Iran and Syria and even Al Qaada to act in more brutal ways. the US is withdrawing and even though leaving troops behind. But at least it withdrew. It took 30 yrs to get Syrian troops out of lebanon and it took even world pressure to withdrew besides the Cedar revolution. But for Iran to continue to fuel the fires in Iraq is not acceptable anymore. if you think you’re then me, then why are you acting like me?

  8. Tarie Al Fanarie Avatar
    Tarie Al Fanarie

    Tony now you’re contradicting what you say before. You won’t to forget the past but this timeyou won’t. We all know the US do not care about Iraq. But we don’t expect Iran and Syria and even Al Qaada to act in more brutal ways. the US is withdrawing and even though leaving troops behind. But at least it withdrew. It took 30 yrs to get Syrian troops out of lebanon and it took even world pressure to withdrew besides the Cedar revolution. But for Iran to continue to fuel the fires in Iraq is not acceptable anymore. if you think you’re then me, then why are you acting like me?

  9. lol tarie. you’re missing the point. the US has gotten what it wanted out of iraq with its oil and business law.

    you’re missing my point that they were the ones who opened the doors for syria and iran to feed on defenselss iraqis. i am all against their motives tarie.

    the us got what it wanted and it could care less what syria and iran does now

  10. lol tarie. you’re missing the point. the US has gotten what it wanted out of iraq with its oil and business law.

    you’re missing my point that they were the ones who opened the doors for syria and iran to feed on defenselss iraqis. i am all against their motives tarie.

    the us got what it wanted and it could care less what syria and iran does now

  11. Prophet Avatar

    The usa has only one goal, which to protect its own interests. If you read the US constitution, it’s always about the interests, freedom, liberty, rights, and prosperity of US citizens. Every elected American official takes an oath to abide by the constitution, and therefore work to accomplish the goal of protecting those interests. Any policy, whether it works or not, the usa adopts is designed to do any or all of the above. The usa doesn’t always get it right. Here are two good example; Iraq, and Ghaza. I’ll leave Ghaza for another day.

    They invaded Iraq in order to ,control the oil fields of the gulf, and secure the flow of oil the us , and the industrial world, and to bring democracy to Iraqis. They adopted a cover story that they are there to get rid of Saddam and “his chemical and biological weapons”. Saddam’s dirty weapons evaporated in the heat of the deserts.

    First goal of the policy worked. The USA is in control of the oil fields. Though , many people are saying now, they could paid enough money to Saddam, and and accomplish the mission at a much cheaper financially, and humanly.

    Iraq’s democracy turned out to be a sectarian Lebanese failed democracy. Millions of Iraqis dead, millions displaced, destroyed economy, shattered society, dysfunctional institutions, and more to come.

    And now tarie wants to blame Iran .lol

    1. Tarie Al Fanarie Avatar
      Tarie Al Fanarie

      Prophet Iran also has benefit in lebanon by supplying weapons to hezbollah and using it at its own will. The US is protecting the oil but there is no doubt about it. But iran is feeding al qaada and shiites weapons while they both attack the US. It also encouraging Al Qaada to attack Shiites. so what the difference here? the us withdrawing from Iraq and it wants it to remain intact. Unlike Iran it seems they want to divide it. If the US wants to control alltogether it would have attacked Libya who was more menace than Saddam himself. You guys keep blaming the US and west. But you ignore syria who hardly built anything other than hezbollah. Its easy to criticize the US but no one dares to say anything against syria and iran. Iran is killing its own people what make you think it cares about the iraqis. Even if the US started the whole thing, there is no need for Syria and Iran to keep fueling the fires or Iraq..

    2. Tarie Al Fanarie Avatar
      Tarie Al Fanarie

      Prophet Iran also has benefit in lebanon by supplying weapons to hezbollah and using it at its own will. The US is protecting the oil but there is no doubt about it. But iran is feeding al qaada and shiites weapons while they both attack the US. It also encouraging Al Qaada to attack Shiites. so what the difference here? the us withdrawing from Iraq and it wants it to remain intact. Unlike Iran it seems they want to divide it. If the US wants to control alltogether it would have attacked Libya who was more menace than Saddam himself. You guys keep blaming the US and west. But you ignore syria who hardly built anything other than hezbollah. Its easy to criticize the US but no one dares to say anything against syria and iran. Iran is killing its own people what make you think it cares about the iraqis. Even if the US started the whole thing, there is no need for Syria and Iran to keep fueling the fires or Iraq..

  12. Prophet Avatar

    The usa has only one goal, which to protect its own interests. If you read the US constitution, it’s always about the interests, freedom, liberty, rights, and prosperity of US citizens. Every elected American official takes an oath to abide by the constitution, and therefore work to accomplish the goal of protecting those interests. Any policy, whether it works or not, the usa adopts is designed to do any or all of the above. The usa doesn’t always get it right. Here are two good example; Iraq, and Ghaza. I’ll leave Ghaza for another day.

    They invaded Iraq in order to ,control the oil fields of the gulf, and secure the flow of oil the us , and the industrial world, and to bring democracy to Iraqis. They adopted a cover story that they are there to get rid of Saddam and “his chemical and biological weapons”. Saddam’s dirty weapons evaporated in the heat of the deserts.

    First goal of the policy worked. The USA is in control of the oil fields. Though , many people are saying now, they could paid enough money to Saddam, and and accomplish the mission at a much cheaper financially, and humanly.

    Iraq’s democracy turned out to be a sectarian Lebanese failed democracy. Millions of Iraqis dead, millions displaced, destroyed economy, shattered society, dysfunctional institutions, and more to come.

    And now tarie wants to blame Iran .lol

  13. Prophet Avatar

    Tarie, I never said they should. All I Was saying is that Nations do what is in their interests. It’s just an analysis .Iran felt the heat , and decided to do whatever it needed to keep Bush occupied, and not give him chance to attack Iran

  14. Prophet Avatar

    Tarie, I never said they should. All I Was saying is that Nations do what is in their interests. It’s just an analysis .Iran felt the heat , and decided to do whatever it needed to keep Bush occupied, and not give him chance to attack Iran

  15. Mark Thompson Avatar
    Mark Thompson

    I have aquestion for the great mind of Tony . Who would Iraq sell its oil to or any of the other Arab oil producing states , even if the Us didn’t have contracts with them ? The US should leave the whole area alone , they would all end up killing themselves .

    1. hey mark the problem with the iraq-US comunication breakdown was not the fact that iraq didnt wanna sell the US oil.

      its to do with the fact that iraq at one point was asked by kuwait to pay its debts off and iraq’s argument was the fact that kuwait used to be a part of iraq and the kuwaiti pipeline is actually on iraqi soil due to its angling.

      so the US was pressuring iraq to pay and iraq refused thus threatening to sell its oil in exchange for euro.

      thats why iraq was given the green light to invade kuwait cos the US had to come by invitation only to the gulf so that it doesnt seem like they’re invading.

      of course, the rest is the present.

      the arabs have no choice but to sell to the US as its the highest consumer per capita even though china is competing heavily cos its just as bad.

      my problem with the whole oil thing is that its all to do with greed.

      if oil is to be used for medicine, clothing, etc and the world can live off hyfro, solar, wind and even the perpetual motion engine which is never allowed to be marketed, we’d be truly in heaven and in the garden of eden.

      but i’m not running this planet am i?

  16. prophet how many army personnel did the usa lost in iraq they would died in the state in one year between someone went mad and shoot people or car crash or plain crash the important the usa get a lot of money of the arab to remove saddam so it did please the arab and the israels as saddan was a big treat to israel lus he was giving the suicide bomber family 25000 dollars each so he was treating isreal plus the get a lot of oil from iraq so the invasion was a winning paper for the american

Leave a Reply