FILE : Dan Sullivan and Mary Peltola
- A federal judge dismissed DOJ’s Alaska Senate election lawsuit after finding the government failed to establish the redressability requirement for Article III standing.
- DOJ sought to delay certification only if Sen. Dan S. Sullivan lost and reallocating every Daniel J. Sullivan vote to him would change the ranked-choice result.
- The dismissal is without prejudice because the court lacked jurisdiction, but Judge Sharon Gleason denied leave to amend as futile; DOJ says it will appeal.
- A federal judge on Sunday dismissed the Department of Justice’s extraordinary lawsuit seeking to delay certification of the Alaska Senate election if incumbent Republican Dan Sullivan loses because of possible voter confusion from another candidate with his name on the ballot.
- The ruling came two days before Election Day, and two days after the U.S. Attorney for Alaska said there were ongoing criminal and civil investigations into the non-incumbent Dan J. Sullivan’s decision to run for the Senate.
- The campaign of Democratic nominee Mary Peltola, state election officials and outside advocacy groups had asked Judge Sharon Gleason to dismiss the DOJ’s lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Anchorage.
- The Department of Justice quickly filed a notice of its intention to appeal the decision to the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
- Peltola is locked in a tight contest with Sen. Dan Sullivan in the election, whose winner will be determined by a ranked-choice system.
- The outcome of the race is one of several contests that determine which party has a majority of the Senate, where Republicans currently hold a narrow majority.
- Neither the other Sullivan nor the fourth candidate on the ballot, Gerald Heikes, is considered to have a chance of winning.
- But voters who rank them as a first choice could swing the outcome by ranking Peltola or Sen. Sullivan second.
- Peltola’s campaign has been accused of soliciting the retired school teacher Dan Sullivan to run for the Senate against the incumbent Sen. Dan S. Sullivan and Peltola.
- Her campaign has denied those claims.
- “No sham investigation or baseless lawsuit from a weaponized Department of Justice is going to stop Alaskans from electing Mary on November 3rd so she can lower costs for Alaska’s working families,” Peltola’s campaign said in a statement after Sunday’s ruling.
- “Alaskans will choose their next U.S. Senator – not Dan Sullivan or his DC allies,” the campaign said.
- In her 20-page decision, Gleason did not resolve whether another Sullivan had been recruited to confuse voters.
- Instead, she said the federal government had failed to establish that it had legal standing to file a civil complaint to postpone certification of the election if Sen. Sullivan lost.
- In that event, the DOJ wanted an investigation into voter intent and possible confusion from having two Dan Sullivans on the ballot.
- “The absence of any explanation from the United States as to how its requested relief could redress its alleged injury while simultaneously maintaining the secrecy of the ballot is telling,” Gleason said in her ruling.
- She noted that early voting in the state was already underway, and that ballots already cast have been commingled in a way that would prevent officials from linking individual ballots to voters.
- “More fundamentally, the United States provides no workable plan as to how it proposes to segregate ballots cast for Daniel J. Sullivan on Election Day and then conduct a court-ordered unspecified ‘investigation’ of those ballots in a manner that would preserve voter secrecy,” Gleason wrote.
- The judge also cited a Supreme Court decision that established the so-called Purcell principle, which “strongly cautions” against courts altering election rules on the eve of election.
- She noted that DOJ claimed it was not seeking to alter the “time, place or manner of Alaska’s election.”
- But at the same time, Gleason said, the DOJ was asking her for an order “preventing the State from certifying the election if certain circumstances occur; a court order requiring the State to segregate and preserve certain ballots; and a court order permitting the United States to conduct an investigation into the intent of those voters who cast ballots for Daniel J. Sullivan.”
- “These requests certainly involve the time, place, and manner of Alaska’s election, which are the responsibilities of the State, not the executive branch of the federal government,” Gleason said.
- The judge said she would not allow the DOJ to amend the lawsuit, which was revised last week to add a new legal claim under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution to the first claim under the National Voter Registration Act. The amended complaint also added details of a New York Times article about the alleged recruitment of the second Sullivan.
- “The Court finds that further amendment would be futile because this Court lacks the authority to order that certain ballots cast by Alaskans be segregated so that federal law enforcement officials can conduct an unspecified investigation of the voters who cast them,” Gleason said.
