Lebanon tensions test Hezbollah-Aoun alliance

FILE PHOTO ; Free Patriotic Movement founder General Michel Aoun is shown with Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah during the signing of their memorandum of understanding in February 2006. The collapse of the Lebanese economy and its institutions is reportedly blamed on the alliance . Aoun is the current president of Lebanon . The presidency and the parliament are reportedly controlled by the Iranian backed Hezbollah. Aoun’s son-in-law replaced him as the FPM chief

Maha El Dahan and Tom Perry wrote the following article in Reuters:

Worsening sectarian tensions in Lebanon are testing an alliance between Shi’ite Hezbollah and its Christian ally President Michel Aoun, who may lose ground to their rivals as they step up opposition to the Iran-backed group’s influence.

Analysts believe divisions that have deepened since an outbreak of violence in Beirut last week may play to the political advantage of Aoun’s long-time Christian adversary, Samir Geagea, a Hezbollah opponent with close Saudi ties.

The alliance between the heavily armed Hezbollah and Aoun has been a defining feature of Lebanese politics since 2006: Hezbollah helped Aoun become president in 2016, while Aoun has provided important Christian backing for the armed status of the group, which is more powerful than the Lebanese army.

But strains have been growing, specifically over Hezbollah’s opposition to the investigation into who was to blame for last year’s catastrophic explosion at the Beirut port, which, while killing many Muslims, did most of its damage in Christian parts of the city.

The dilemma facing Aoun sharpened last week when tensions over the investigation ignited Beirut’s deadliest street violence in years, reviving memories of the 1975-90 civil war.

All of the seven dead were Shi’ites, killed in what Hezbollah has called an ambush by the Lebanese Forces, a Christian party led by Geagea.

The LF denies this and blames the other side for provoking trouble by sending supporters into the Christian neighbourhood of Ain al-Remmaneh where it says four residents were wounded before a shot was fired.

The violence began as supporters of Hezbollah and its Shi’ite ally, Amal, began gathering for a protest to demand the removal of Judge Tarek Bitar, who is investigating the blast that killed more than 200 people.

“Today, you have Christians rejecting these scenes of getting back to civil war memories, and at the same time not happy with the way Shia are expressing their opposition to the Judge Bitar process,” said a source familiar with thinking in the Free Patriotic Movement, the party founded by Aoun.

The FPM and Hezbollah had not decided to part ways, but the course of events was separating them, the source said.

FPM officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In his first speech since the violence, Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said the Lebanese Forces saw itself as the protector of Christian blood but Hezbollah was no enemy of Christians.

Nasrallah said the LF had opposed his party’s understanding with the FPM when it was concluded in 2006 because it did not want Christians and Muslims “to open up to each other”.

There was no immediate LF response to Nasrallah’s remarks.

Hezbollah has accused Bitar of bias as he has sought to question some of its allies on suspicion of negligence that led one of the largest non-nuclear explosions ever.

Geagea, who stands by Bitar, has said Thursday’s trouble was begun by Hezbollah and Amal supporters in Ain al-Remmaneh.

“It wasn’t the Lebanese Forces that defended the area… all the people of Ain al-Remmaneh did that,” Geagea said in an interview late on Friday.

The view that Ain al-Remmaneh was attacked was widely shared among Christians, said Mohanad Hage Ali of the Carnegie Middle East Center.

“There is some kind of agreement among Christians on supporting the port blast investigation and the right to self defence – and that Hezbollah and Amal attacked the area before they were attacked themselves,” he said.

“Geagea so far seems to have gained some popularity among Christians.”

Nabil Boumonsef, deputy editor-in-chief of Annahar newspaper, said the FPM had made a mistake by accusing Geagea of the violence and he enjoyed wide sympathy among Christians.

“I see the FPM as the biggest loser,” he told Reuters.

The army initially said gunfire had targeted protesters but later stated there had been an altercation and exchange of fire while protesters were on their way to the demonstration.

A soldier suspected of firing towards protesters is under investigation.

The FPM is the biggest Christian party. In Lebanon’s last parliamentary election in 2018, the FPM, Hezbollah and other parties that support the group’s possession of weapons secured a majority.

Hezbollah’s opponents hope this can be overturned in 2022, with Christian seats seen as the main battleground.

In addition to the port blast, Aoun’s presidency has been overshadowed by a massive financial meltdown that has plunged more than three quarters of the population into poverty.

Gebran Bassil, FPM head and Aoun’s son-in-law, revisited the arguments for the alliance with Hezbollah in a speech on Saturday, including its fight against jihadists at the Syrian border.

He appeared to side with Hezbollah in implying that the Lebanese Forces were to blame for the violence, and echoed some of Hezbollah’s criticism of the port probe.

But Bassil said it was still not clear that Bitar himself was politicised and the investigation should continue. “We will confront those who try to obstruct the file,” he said.




3 responses to “Lebanon tensions test Hezbollah-Aoun alliance”

  1. I guess Aoun the former army chief crowned Nasrallah as the president of Lebanon forever with his Hezbollah deal . What a stupid general he was and still is

  2. Lebanese media report that the Lebanese military court wants to testify against Samir Jaja, the leader of the Lebanese Forces Party, on the issue of the shooting incidents in Beirut about a week ago.
    Samir Jaja in response:
    “If the report is true and I am called to testify, then the military court should summon Hassan Nasrallah to testify before I can testify”

    1. Nasrallah never testified in one court or another.
      Jaja’s demand makes the business interesting

Leave a Reply