“Time to move Trump out and elect Biden “: Scientific American said in its 1st-ever presidential endorsement

Share:

Sept. 15 (UPI) — For the first time in Scientific American’s 175-year history, the popular science magazine has made an endorsement for president, urging its readers Tuesday to vote for former Vice President Joe Biden.

File photo: A group of former George W. Bush administration officials has pledged to “engage and mobilize disenchanted GOP voters” through a new super PAC formed to elect Joe Biden to the White House. Scientific American said in its 1st-ever presidential endorsement: “Time to move Trump out and elect Biden”

In an editorial published online, the popular science magazine said it is endorsing Biden, the Democratic nominee, for president as he offers “fact-based plans to protect our health, our economy and the environment,” among other proposals.

“We do not do this lightly,” it said.

The editorial, which will also be published in the magazine’s October issue, said the magazine was compelled this year to endorse Biden as President Donald Trump, who is running for re-election as the Republican nominee, “has badly damaged the U.S. and its people” through his alleged rejection of evidence and science.

The magazine rails against Trump in the editorial, calling his response to the coronavirus pandemic, which has killed more than 190,000 Americans, “inept and dishonest” and that his rejection of evidence and public health measures have been “catastrophic” for the nation, blaming his actions for accelerating the spread of the virus.

“His lies encouraged people to engage in risky behavior, spreading the virus further, and have driven wedges between Americans who take the threat seriously and those who believe Trump’s falsehoods,” the editorial said.

“Trump’s reaction to American’s worst public health crisis in a century has been to say ‘I don’t take responsibility at all,’” the magazine added, quoting the president responding to a reporter’s question in March. “Instead, he blamed other countries and his White House predecessor, who left the office three years before the pandemic began.”

Tim Murtaugh, Trump 2020 communications director, defended the president from the accusations in a statement, saying he has listened to medical experts in the fight against the coronavirus.

“The experts agree that the restriction on travel from China saved thousands of American lives,” he said, referring to the restrictions on travel to and from the Asian country Trump imposed early on during the pandemic.

Concerning Biden, the editorial said in comparison to Trump he is prepared with plans to control COVID-19, improve health care, reduce carbon emissions and restore the role of science in policymaking.

“He solicits expertise and has turned that knowledge into solid policy proposals,” it said.

The magazine states it is unclear how many of his ambitious goals he’ll be able to accomplish as much depends upon Congress but that Biden is aware of the importance of to heed science in the recovery from the ongoing crisis.

“Although Trump and his allies have tried to create obstacles that prevent people from casting ballots safely in November, either by mail or in person, it is crucial that we surmount them and vote,” it concludes. “It’s time to move Trump out and elect Biden.”

UPI

Share:

Comments

4 responses to ““Time to move Trump out and elect Biden “: Scientific American said in its 1st-ever presidential endorsement”

  1. Lol. Scientific American media bias rating is Lean Left
    https://www.allsides.com/news-source/scientific-american

  2. Es gibt kein Normalität mehr Avatar
    Es gibt kein Normalität mehr

    Polls indicate that Trump’s approval rating points to one term president.
    An ABC News/Ipsos poll – conducted in September with a 4.7 percent margin of error – showed 65% of those surveyed still disapprove of Trump’s handling of the pandemic.
    Sixty-eight percent of Americans don’t trust what Trump says about the virus and 67% said he acted too slowly.

    1. Idi*t, like Hind obsessed with Jews, you are, copy pasting infosharmuta, obsessed with Trump and Bibi. Why??? Are they under your bed?

  3. The International Criminal Court on Wednesday closed for good the
    case of war crimes allegations against Israel concerning the 2010 Mavi
    Marmara incident in which 10 Turkish citizens were killed during a clash
    with IDF naval commandos.
    The decision by the ICC’s Pretrial Chamber followed a decision by the
    ICC prosecutor to close the case for a third time in December 2019, as
    well as prior rulings by the ICC’s highest body, the appeals chamber,
    which appeared to undermine attempts to force the ICC prosecutor to move
    forward with the case.
    This is the first time that the ICC Pretrial Chamber has thrown in
    the towel after appeals against the ICC prosecutor’s decision to close
    the case.
    In its December 2019 decision, the ICC Prosecution made some of its
    most complimentary statements regarding the IDF and Israeli positions on
    some war crimes issues.
    From a technical perspective, ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda’s third
    consecutive decision to close her preliminary probe of the alleged war
    crimes was nothing new. She and the ICC Pretrial Chamber have been at
    loggerheads over the case since 2014.
    The ICC pushed her three times to open a full criminal investigation,
    and each time she said that there was no basis to move forward.
    But this time was different. Because the latest ICC ruling directed
    Bensouda to accept certain facts, she needed to more deeply analyze the
    IDF’s behavior.
    In her past two decisions to close the case, she merely said that 10
    dead activists who clashed with the IDF are not a high enough number of
    casualties to warrant her office’s attention, which deals mostly with
    genocide or mass killings

Leave a Reply