Russia rejects Kerry’s principles for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations over two-state solution

Share:
US Secretary of State John Kerry and Russia Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov speak to the media after a meeting concerning Syria, at UN headquarters in New York on September 30, 2015 AFP
US Secretary of State John Kerry and Russia Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov speak to the media after a meeting concerning Syria, at UN headquarters in New York on September 30, 2015 AFP

It appears that Russian president Vladimir Putin is again trying to interfere in the US domestic politics by siding with president -elect Donald Trump against president Obama on the issue of Israeli Palestinian  negotiations for two state solution and Jewish settlements   . While Obama is against the settlements , Trump is encouraging the Israelis to build more and has in the past donated funds for their construction. Trump nominated an ambassador to Israel who strongly supports building more settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories of West Bank and Jerusalem. Putin’s immediate aim is to get Trump to end the economic sanctions against Russia , but many observers believe that Putin’s ultimate aim is to undermine western democracies

__________

Amid frantic diplomatic maneuvers ahead of a Wednesday speech by US Secretary of State John Kerry on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,

Russia reportedly rejected a request by United States for the Middle East Quartet to adopt the principles set  in the speech that US Secretary of State John Kerry presented on Wednesday , Israeli  media reported on Wednesday ahead of Kerry’s speech .

According the reports Kerry spoke with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Tuesday night, at which time the Russian foreign minister dismissed the US secretary’s proposal, according to Haaretz.

Lavrov subsequently released a statement urging direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians.

“The two top diplomats exchanged views on the situation in the Palestinian-Israeli settlement and around it,” says a transcript from the call, which appears on Russia’s semi-official Tass news agency.

“Lavrov stressed the necessity of creating conditions for direct talks between the leaders of Israel and Palestine and warned against bringing US’ domestic agenda into the work of the Middle East Quartet and the United Nations Security Council. He stressed that attempts to use these formats in bickering between the Democrats and Republicans are harmful.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly fears that the Middle East Quartet — made up of the US, UN, Russia and EU — could adopt the principles set out by Kerry Wednesday at a Paris summit on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict next month, and then return to the Security Council in the very last days of Barack Obama’s presidency to cement these new parameters in a resolution on Mideast peacemaking.

On Friday, Russia was one of 14 states that voted in favor of a Security Council resolution denouncing Israeli settlements. The decision, which infuriated Israel, was allowed to pass after the US decided to depart from its traditional policy and abstain instead of veto the resolution.

According to a partial account by Haaretz of some behind-the-scenes events before the anti-settlements vote, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had hoped Russia would delay the vote in return for Israel’s acquiescence to a Russian request to skip a UN General Assembly vote days earlier on a resolution that would have allowed for the establishment of a mechanism to investigate allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Syria.

Netanyahu called Russian President Vladimir Putin hours before the vote Friday, according to Haaretz, in an attempt to persuade him to postpone. It seems Putin answered the call: less than an hour before the 15-member council was set to cast votes, Russian Ambassador to the United Nations Vitaly Churkin asked for closed consultations to request a delay on the vote until after the Christmas holiday.

Churkin, according to Western diplomats who spoke to Haaretz, said Russia was not satisfied with the text, which slammed Israeli settlement building and expansion in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and with the timing of the vote — just weeks before a new US administration is set to take power.

But Churkin was rebuffed and the vote passed with the 14 votes in favor, including Russia’s, and the US abstention.

Kerry was originally slated to give his address on Thursday, in the immediate aftermath of the scheduled vote, but canceled the speech after Egypt pulled the resolution at the last minute, apparently responding to pressure from Israel and US President-elect Donald Trump. The measure was reintroduced Friday by New Zealand, Senegal, Malaysia and Venzuela.

Some analysts are of the opinion that Putin is again trying to interfere in the US domestic politics by siding with president  elect Donald Trump against president Obama . While Obama is against the settlements , Trump is encouraging the Israelis to build more and has in the past donated funds for their construction. Trump nominated an ambassador to Israel who strongly supports building more settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories of West Bank and Jerusalem

Share:

Comments

5 responses to “Russia rejects Kerry’s principles for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations over two-state solution”

  1. 5thDrawer Avatar

    Movie Night, for me …. One of my old favourites. About people of freedom relating … together.
    ‘The Tops’ had never understood it – except in the finality of their efforts.
    ‘Vanishing Point’.

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      But one can understand the “diplomatic maneuvers” becoming “frantic ” … as ‘the people’ who reside in the countries are watching more now – of all the suppositions being promoted in various ways – as they have been over the many years of secret ‘deals’ and undemocratic methodologies.
      Very few seem to have been willing to ‘play ball’ for the goals of humanity, truths, or justice – even as they spout the anguished words. And now the webs trapping them are their own – the ‘road-signs’ have moved.

      1. Not “frantic” hysterical Arabesques.. bla bla bla.. political lies and machination shows for fed up public.

    2. ‘Israel’s Settlements Have No Legal Validity, Constitute Flagrant Violation of International Law, Security Council Reaffirms’!
      14 Delegations in Favour of Resolution 2334 (2016) as United States Abstains
      https://www.un.org/press/en/2016/sc12657.doc.htm

  2. Under the UNSC 242, Israel should hand back captured territory and in 1993 the Palestinian Liberation Organization agreed that 242 could serve as a basis for talks (with Jerusalem as capital of two states….).

    But the reality of the UNSC 242 didn’t ‘worked’, Israel has pulled out of Sinai and Gaza, annexed Golan and east Jerusalem and is occupying and settling the West Bank.

    I don’t understand Kerry’s logics when he is insisting that UNSC 242 has been “accepted by both sides” and must be followed, albeit with “mutually agreed equivalent swaps.” when according to Israel’s education minister, Naftali Bennett, the two-state solution will be “taken off the agenda”.

    How can Kerry claim “accepted by both sides” when the reality is faraway from his nonsense.

    With Trump ideology the Palestinian state will be ‘off the table’ since the kind of Bennett intend to annex the West Bank or most of the West Bank.

    Russia rejects Kerry’s principles – do they intend to help the Trump/Bennett solution?
    Only Sergei Lavrov have the answer on this matter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *