2016 World Press Freedom Index ­, shows leaders are paranoid about journalists


journalism freedomMost of the movement in the World Press Freedom Index unveiled today by Reporters Without Borders is indicative of a climate of fear and tension combined with increasing control over newsrooms by governments and private-sector interests.

The 2016 World Press Freedom Index reflects the intensity of the attacks on journalistic freedom and independence by governments, ideologies and private-sector interests during the past year.

180 countries ranked

Seen as a benchmark throughout the world, the Index ranks 180 countries according to the freedom allowed journalists. It also includes indicators of the level of media freedom violations in each region. These show that Europe (with 19.8 points) still has the freest media, followed distantly by Africa (36.9), which for the first time overtook the Americas (37.1), a region where violence against journalists is on the rise. Asia (43.8) and Eastern Europe/Central Asia (48.4) follow, while North Africa/Middle East (50.8) is still the region where journalists are most subjected to constraints of every kind.

Three north European countries head the rankings. They are Finland (ranked 1st, the position it has held since 2010), Netherlands (2nd, up 2 places) and Norway (3rd, down 1). The countries that rose most in the Index include Tunisia (96th, up 30), thanks to a decline in violence and legal proceedings, and Ukraine (107th, up 22), where the conflict in the east of the country abated.

The countries that fell farthest include Poland (47th, down 29), where the ultra-conservative government seized control of the public media, and (much farther down) Tajikistan, which plunged 34 places to 150th as a result of the regime’s growing authoritarianism. The Sultanate of Brunei (155th, down 34) suffered a similar fall because gradual introduction of the Sharia and threats of blasphemy charges have fuelled self-censorship. Burundi (156th, down 11) fell because of the violence against journalists resulting from President Pierre Nkurunziza’s contested reelection for a third term. The same “infernal trio” are in the last three positions: Turkmenistan (178th), North Korea (179th) and Eritrea (180th).

“The climate of fear results in a growing aversion to debate and pluralism, a clampdown on the media by ever more authoritarian and oppressive governments, and reporting in the privately-owned media that is increasingly shaped by personal interests. Journalism worthy of the name must be defended against the increase in propaganda and media content that is made to order or sponsored by vested interests. Guaranteeing the public’s right to independent and reliable news and information is essential if humankind’s problems, both local and global, are to be solved.”

Published annually by RSF since 2002, the World Press Freedom Index is an important advocacy tool based on the principle of emulation between states. Because it is now so well known, its influence over the media, governments and international organizations is growing.

The Index is based on an evaluation of media freedom that measures pluralism, media independence, the quality of the legal framework and the safety of journalists in 180 countries. It is compiled by means of a questionnaire in 20 languages that is completed by experts all over the world. This qualitative analysis is combined with quantitative data on abuses and acts of violence against journalists during the period evaluated.

The Index is not an indicator of the quality of the journalism in each country, nor does it rank public policies even if governments obviously have a major impact on their country’s ranking.

Closer to home:  Lebanon ranked 98th out of 180 countries and scored 31.95 points, while  Israel ranked 101 ,  Iran 169 and Syria 177

Tunisia ranked 96th the best ranking  in the Middle East -North African region . All the other Mid East countries ranked over 100





4 responses to “2016 World Press Freedom Index ­, shows leaders are paranoid about journalists”

  1. Mr Happy Man Avatar
    Mr Happy Man

    Who put this thing together? To say that continental Europe faces a good situation while North America faces a satisfactory situation is rather perplexing. In North America, if you demonstrate your freedom of expression and write disparagingly about a group, someone gets mad. In Europe, if you do this, you get hauled before the so-called Human Rights Court (or whatever it’s called). And certain ideas do get censored in Europe – for example, it is nearly impossible to put forth pro-gun arguments on a European site after a gun tragedy. This is rather easy to do on North American sites.
    Then again, Europe is held up by the elites as the gold standard the rest of us are supposed to live by – even though the standards of living and freedoms that western Europeans possess are lower than that which is available to the average American (and Canadian).

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      Reporters answering questions. They seem to know where they get killed most often…
      “The Index is not an indicator of the quality of the journalism in each country, nor does it rank public policies even if governments obviously have a major impact on their country’s ranking.”

    2. The ridiculousness of New Zealand (who cares?!) being coloured in saintly white, while Australia is suspiciously yellow.

Leave a Reply