Obama’s legacy falls apart

Share:

BESTPIX Obama Speaks On The Affordable Care Act In White House Briefing RoomBy John Podhoretz

Deep into the seventh year of his tenure, Barack Obama is thinking about his post-presidential legacy. We know this because he’s telling us so.

In an interview this week with The Atlantic about the potential deal with Iran regarding its nuclear program, the president sought to use the fact of his relative youth and his consciousness about how history might judge him to his advantage: “Look, 20 years from now, I’m still going to be around, God willing. If Iran has a nuclear weapon, it’s my name on this. I think it’s fair to say that in addition to our profound national-security interests, I have a personal interest in locking this down.”

In one sense, this is what we want presidents to worry about. We want them to be restrained by the cautionary examples provided by history and by the fact that history will judge them.

But what if the desire to tip the scales of history’s judgment in his favor leads a president to take dangerous risks?

In fact, we know that is what Obama has done with the Iran deal because his aides have told us so.

His deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, put it this way last year to a roomful of liberal activists when talking about the initial November 2013 agreement to begin talking about Iran’s nuclear program: “Bottom line is, this is the best opportunity we’ve had to resolve the Iranian issue diplomatically … This is probably the biggest thing President Obama will do in his second term on foreign policy. This is health care for us, just to put it in context.”

But this “opportunity” didn’t just emerge organically — which is actually where “opportunities” are supposed to come from. It did not result from changing conditions that opened a new possibility of finding common ground.

Iran’s behavior didn’t change, and its pursuit of nuclear weapons didn’t change. Obama manufactured what Rhodes called an opportunity by pursuing a deal with Iran and dangling all kinds of carrots in front of the mullahs.

And why? Because he wants a foreign-policy legacy to match the size and scope of his key legacy in domestic policy.

And who can blame him? After the failure of the Arab Spring, the collapse of Libya, the failure to act on his self-imposed “red line” in Syria, Russia’s seizure of Crimea from Ukraine and the terrifying rise and forward march of ISIS, the only unmitigated positive on his foreign-policy spreadsheet remains the killing of Osama bin Laden.

Look, the guy will need something impressive to fill the exhibition space at his brand-new presidential library in Chicago.

Obama’s asking us to trust him because, he says, you can’t think he would want to look like the man who allowed Iran to go nuclear at some point in the future.

So what explains the president’s own unprompted comments in an NPR interview in April that, under the terms already announced, Iran would have the right to go nuclear by 2028 — when he will, God willing, be a mere 67 years of age?

“A more relevant fear,” he said, “would be that in year 13, 14, 15, they have advanced centrifuges that enrich uranium fairly rapidly, and at that point, the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero.”

Obama offered an answer. “The option of a future president to take action if in fact they try to obtain a nuclear weapon is undiminished,” he said.

So it will be up to his successors to bail him out in the eyes of history and make it appear as though his legacy wasn’t the nuclear destabilization of the Middle East!

Speaking of legacies, how’s that key domestic-policy legacy going? Not so hot.

ObamaCare remains unpopular; far more Americans oppose than favor it.

People still remember the disaster of the October 2013 rollout, which still casts a shadow over the program today.

Those hard feelings were deepened last year by the discovery of a series of talks by key ObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber in which he bragged that it had been falsely marketed to the American people to take advantage of their stupidity.

Its defenders say the program is beginning to work, in the sense that it’s covering more people — but it’s not covering as many as the administration said it would by this time.

They tout the fact that the cost of the program is lower than it was supposed to be by now.

But that’s an inconsistent claim; it’s only less expensive because it isn’t meeting its target numbers, not because cost savings have suddenly materialized from the ether.

Meanwhile, at some point over the next month, the entire policy may be thrown into terminal chaos when the Supreme Court issues its judgment in a case called King v. Burwell — which challenges the legality of a central component of ObamaCare.

In the latest Real Clear Politics polling average, 62 percent say the country is on the wrong track — more than seven years after Obama moved into the White House.

Obama still has 18 months to go, and presidents have staged remarkable turnarounds in public opinion in such a time frame. Bill Clinton did it before his re-election in 1996, which seemed like a ludicrous prospect in early 1995.

Ronald Reagan was at low ebb in mid-1987 and left office on a triumphant high in early 1989.

But we’ve also seen the opposite. Indeed, we’ve seen the opposite more recently. George W. Bush was in bad shape in mid-2007, unquestionably — worse than Obama, because he’d lost the confidence of some Republicans, while Obama seems not to have lost any of his base.

But in 2008, the bottom fell out when a financial crisis that began in the spring turned into a total meltdown by the fall. Bush left office with one poll showing his approval rating at 22 percent.

Right now, would you bet on things getting substantially better for Barack Obama, or substantially worse? Does it look like we’re going to triumph over ISIS?

Does it feel like the economy is going to improve or that ObamaCare will suddenly gain public support? Does it seem like the deal with Iran is a good one?

If you answer these questions in the affirmative, then you are likely to be the sort of person who’s kept your 2008 Obama “Hope” poster on your wall and your 2012 Obama bumper sticker on your car.

Alas for America and the world, a poster and a bumper sticker do not a legacy make.

NY Post

Share:

Comments

18 responses to “Obama’s legacy falls apart”

  1. MekensehParty Avatar
    MekensehParty

    Same old refrain from the same pro-bibi propagandists
    18 months left and 46% approval, that’s not bad at all for a two terms president
    Again calling for the President to do what exactly? Go to war with Iran?
    Why doesn’t the writer send his own kids ahead?

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      And what was Bibi’s actual percent of total voters even after the ‘fabulous’ turn-around?
      You just gotta love ‘pollsters’.

    2. shloime Avatar
      shloime

      do? nothing. just leave the sanctions in place, when they were working, and let the iranians make an offer, like dismantling a few thousand of their centrifuges.

      after all, they don’t really need them for “peaceful” purposes…

      1. MekensehParty Avatar
        MekensehParty

        They did, under the agreement they will bring down the number of centrifuges, lower the percentage of enriched uranium and allow walk in inspections of all their sites even the military ones. AND the sanctions are to be removed gradually.
        the plan that you’re proposing is the plan in place
        And it’s working so what’s the fuss about?

        1. shloime Avatar
          shloime

          no, they agreed to reduce the number of centrifuges OPERATING, but not to remove, dismantle or destroy a single one. which means they will be in place, just not switched on.

          and according to the ayatollah khamenei, who does have the last word, as reported just yesterday, there will be no unscheduled inspections and no access to parchin.

          1. MekensehParty Avatar
            MekensehParty

            That’s even worse for them, that’s a ton of money spent on unused centrifuges. They’d better dismantle them because it will cost billions to keep them dust free.
            According to the same ayatollah, only this time in a speech not meant for Iranians, inspectors will be allowed to tour any military facility and interview nuclear experts any time any place.
            Finally, the military threats on Iran’s head pre-agreement are the same as post-agreement. At any point Iran breaks the deal it can expect bombs raining from the skies. Nothing has changed on that front.

  2. IDF Air Force in response to a rocket attack launched a series of strikes on the Gaza Strip

  3. Heat waves in India killed more than 1,100 people

  4. arzatna1 Avatar
    arzatna1

    Obama’s desperation for a deal with Iran is clouding his image and his legacy and Iran loves it . They could end up treating him like they treated Carter before him. Obviously there is no love lost between America and Iran’s Ayatollahs so even if a deal is reached , America will remain Iran’s enemy no 1

  5. Mostafa Ahmed Awwad, 36, of Yorktown, Virginia, pleaded guilty to
    charges of attempted espionage relating to his attempt to provide
    schematics of the nuclear aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford to Egypt
    while serving as a Navy engineer https://www.fbi.gov/norfolk/press-releases/2015/navy-civilian-engineer-pleads-guilty-to-attempted-espionage

  6. … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: yalibnan.com/2015/05/26/obamas-legacy-falls-apart/ […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *