Israel calls Iran nuclear deal a ‘historic mistake’

Share:

netanyahu-under-fireThe Israeli government called the deal reached with Iran over its nuclear program a “historic mistake,” saying it only slows a nuclear program that will still be capable of producing a bomb.

Speaking to his Cabinet on Sunday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the agreement endangered Israel, adding the nation is not bound by the international community’s nuclear deal and reserves the right to defend itself.

“What was reached last night in Geneva is not a historic agreement, it is a historic mistake,” Netanyahu said. “Today the world became a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world made a significant step in obtaining the most dangerous weapons in the world.”

“We’re worried about the agreement but our job is to keep up the warnings,” said Yair Lapid, Israel’s Minister of Finance and part of Netanyahu’s coalition government. “We’re not comfortable but this warning needs to be done. We have six months until there is (hopefully) a better agreement.Voicing what he called Israel’s right to self-defense, he said, “I want to clarify that Israel will not let Iran develop nuclear military capability.”

“We may be the only child in the room saying the king has no clothes but that’s what we must do.”

An official in the Prime Minister’s office said the agreement “gives Iran exactly what it wants: a significant easing of sanctions and allows Iran to keep the most significant parts of its nuclear program. The agreement allows Iran to continue enriching uranium and leaves it the centrifuges that enables it create (fissile) material to create nuclear weapons. Likewise, the agreement doesn’t lead to dismantling the Arak reactor. The economic pressure on Iran would have led to a much better agreement that would have dismantled Iran’s nuclear capability.”

The White House said the interim deal limits Iran’s existing stockpiles of enriched uranium, which can be turned into the fissile core of nuclear arms. The accord curbs the number and capabilities of the centrifuges used to enrich and limits Iran ability to “produce weapons-grade plutonium” from a reactor in the advanced stages of construction.

Iran’s nuclear program will also be subject to “increased transparency and intrusive monitoring.” In return, the White House said economic sanctions on Iran imposed to get it to curtail its nuclear activity will be eased.

Uri Savir, a former Israeli ambassador and president of the The Peres Center for Peace, called the deal an “historic agreement,” saying it will go a long way to limit Iran’s nuclear program for six months and could also jump start progress on Syria and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. He lauded Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, “who despite opposition advanced global peace diplomacy.”

Nafatali Bennett, the Minister of Economy and Commerce, said on Army Radio that world powers could have used the talks in Geneva that led to the deal to force Iran to give up its nuclear program rather than freeze it at a point where it can resume work at any time.

“Iran was on the mat because of the sanctions, but then the West picked it up and gave it something to drink. Israel does not have to be a party to this agreement and has the right to defend its security,” he said, alluding to possible military action. “The whole Middle East is affected but the danger to Israel is unique.”

In early-morning Facebook posts, Israelis compared the deal to the one made by former British prime minister Neville Chamberlain, who brokered an agreement with Nazi Germany in 1938 that did nothing to prevent a world war as promised.

Josh Hasten, who hosts a political radio show, told USA TODAY that, “There is no doubt that the leaders in Iran are smiling this morning as they have been given a pass by the world community to maintain the option of building a nuclear weapon.”

He described the deal as an appeasement that will leave the entire world and not just Israel at risk of a nuclear Iran.

“It’s truly a major step in the wrong direction,” he said.

USA Today

Share:

Comments

32 responses to “Israel calls Iran nuclear deal a ‘historic mistake’”

  1. man-o-war Avatar

    Some would argue that Israel is a “historic mistake”

    1. IraniAngel Avatar

      hahahaha

    2. Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel Avatar
      Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel

      Yes, but most of those people admire the Nazis.

      1. man-o-war Avatar

        Nice!! You had to pull the Nazi card! I think Palestinians have a right to feel that way with out being labeled Nazi admirers.

        I remember always hearing crazies saying Hollywood and US congress was full of Israeli spies working for Mossad. Followed by people like you calling them Nazis and anti-semitic, running their names through the mud and ruining careers. Turns out the crazies were onto something. Have you heard of Arnon Milchan the Hollywood producer behind hits such as Pretty Woman, LA confidential, and Fight Club? Ok, so slightly off topic, but appropriate considering the name calling and timing.

        1. Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel Avatar
          Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel

          I didn’t say that everyone who thinks so is a Nazi but most are definitely prejudiced against Jews. Oh, a relative of mine works for that producer. He’s Israeli but not all Israelis are in the Mossad πŸ™‚

          1. man-o-war Avatar

            Prejudiced against Jews? Is it possible to think the creation of the state is a “historic mistake”, and not be prejudiced against Jews?

            Haha, just like not all Sunni Muslims are suicide bombers ; )
            It just happens to be that 93% of suicide bombers are Sunni.

          2. 5thDrawer Avatar

            … that we know of … πŸ˜‰

  2. man-o-war Avatar

    Some would argue that Israel is a “historic mistake”

    1. IraniAngel Avatar

      hahahaha

    2. Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel Avatar
      Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel

      Yes, but most of those people admire the Nazis.

      1. man-o-war Avatar

        Nice!! You had to pull the Nazi card! I think Palestinians have a right to feel that way with out being labeled Nazi admirers.

        I remember always hearing crazies saying Hollywood and US congress was full of Israeli spies working for Mossad. Followed by people like you calling them Nazis and anti-semitic, running their names through the mud and ruining careers. Turns out the crazies were onto something. Have you heard of Arnon Milchan the Hollywood producer behind hits such as Pretty Woman, LA confidential, and Fight Club? Ok, so slightly off topic, but appropriate considering the name calling and timing.

        1. Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel Avatar
          Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel

          I didn’t say that everyone who thinks so is a Nazi but most are definitely prejudiced against Jews. Oh, a relative of mine works for that producer. He’s Israeli but not all Israelis are in the Mossad πŸ™‚

          1. man-o-war Avatar

            Prejudiced against Jews? Is it possible to think the creation of the state is a “historic mistake”, and not be prejudiced against Jews?

            Haha, just like not all Sunni Muslims are suicide bombers ; )
            It just happens to be that 93% of suicide bombers are Sunni.

          2. 5thDrawer Avatar

            … that we know of … πŸ˜‰

  3. Constantin7 Avatar
    Constantin7

    Just shut-up Netanyahu and stop making a fuss about Iran’s nuclear capabilities for no reason. Everyone knows that even if Iran acquires the nuclear bomb, which I don’t believe the western world would allow it, it will never ever strike Israel with a nuclear bomb. Why ? For the simple reason of the size of Israel. Any inhabited place in Israel is within maximum 50 km from any Palestinian town or city. So if Iran wants to “eliminate” Israel with a nuclear bomb strike, it will automatically eliminate the palestinian population in Israel and Palestine and most probably destroy the holy city of Jerusalem. For this reason Iran will never strike against Israel, but Israel with its foollish paranoia may strike against Iran and there I don’t know what would be the consequences !

    1. IraniAngel Avatar

      im pretty sure you are right on that one.

    2. Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel Avatar
      Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel

      You think they care about a few million Sunnis if they can destroy Israel??? You think even most Arabs wouldn’t sacrifice a few million to destroy Israel???

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Yes … Constantin sees it from an ‘other-side’ perspective only, as do too many … while history shows that the El Supremos of the world have never been shy of doing ‘what must be done’ and convincing people of the need to ‘sacrifice for the better ‘good”; when the whole concept was about changing societies to a specific line of thought. And the most effective tool for convincing humans of that has been religion … the second most effective has been economics.
        Considering how many languish in jails everywhere for not ‘toeing a line’ of thought (In Iran for example, the ‘Green Ones’ – in the USA, the druggies – in Russia, the bad-music-singers), it’s necessary to know as much as possible about general human failings if one is expected to make rational decisions for self-preservation.
        When there was lots of land for oneself, it was up to you alone what you were willing to put up with to live as long as possible, or whether or not you wanted to ‘end it all’.
        These days, try to find a quiet spot to run naked in the wind. There will at least be someone watching through a long-range lens saying ‘he should be shot’ – if not a dork on a balcony in the vertical society 2 feet away. Humans decided that to live together was better for self-preservation, and then gave up some personal freedom to ‘adjust’ to the crowd.
        Which ‘crowd of thought’ they choose – after reading history – is about the education. But if all the choices are not known, the individual may well be convinced that ‘ending it all’ for a god is the greatest thing he can do. And eliminating several thousand is fine, in many minds, since they were told that their ‘souls’ will be in a better place … and certainly living in constant danger of starvation, because the crowd is too big anyway, leads to dreams of something ‘better’ … people CAN be convinced to ‘go out with a bang’ – and taking a few with them is ok because it’s like doing them a favour. Even if others don’t know it, they will thank you ‘on the other side’ of that lovely cloud.
        The El Supremos – who may very well have convinced themselves there is a ‘better place’ – are happy enough to have made their own space, and have food always on the table. That it would all be irradiated is something they hadn’t been educated to consider.

      2. They (Iran and friends like Assad and Hezbollah) are already killing so many Sunnis in Syria and they are still making excuses by blaming Israel. If Iran liberated Palestine, do you really think that the Sunnis would be better off than those in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon who are suffering under the Shia Iranian/Assad/Hezbollah boot there? Who are they fooling? Their resistance against Israel is a cover and excuse for the Shia Iranian oppression of Sunni Arabs in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, etc.

  4. Constantin7 Avatar
    Constantin7

    Just shut-up Netanyahu and stop making a fuss about Iran’s nuclear capabilities for no reason. Everyone knows that even if Iran acquires the nuclear bomb, which I don’t believe the western world would allow it, it will never ever strike Israel with a nuclear bomb. Why ? For the simple reason of the size of Israel. Any inhabited place in Israel is within maximum 50 km from any Palestinian town or city. So if Iran wants to “eliminate” Israel with a nuclear bomb strike, it will automatically eliminate the palestinian population in Israel and Palestine and most probably destroy the holy city of Jerusalem. For this reason Iran will never strike against Israel, but Israel with its foollish paranoia may strike against Iran and there I don’t know what would be the consequences !

    1. IraniAngel Avatar

      i pretty sure you are right on that.

    2. Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel Avatar
      Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel

      You think they care about a few million Sunnis if they can destroy Israel??? You think even most Arabs wouldn’t sacrifice a few million to destroy Israel???

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Yes … Constantin sees it from an ‘other-side’ perspective only, as do too many … while history shows that the El Supremos of the world have never been shy of doing ‘what must be done’ and convincing people of the need to ‘sacrifice for the better ‘good”; when the whole concept was about changing societies to a specific line of thought. And the most effective tool for convincing humans of that has been religion … the second most effective has been economics.
        Considering how many languish in jails everywhere for not ‘toeing a line’ of thought (In Iran for example, the ‘Green Ones’ – in the USA, the druggies – in Russia, the bad-music-singers), it’s necessary to know as much as possible about general human failings if one is expected to make rational decisions for self-preservation.
        When there was lots of land for oneself, it was up to you alone what you were willing to put up with to live as long as possible, or whether or not you wanted to ‘end it all’.
        These days, try to find a quiet spot to run naked in the wind. There will at least be someone watching through a long-range lens saying ‘he should be shot’ – if not a dork on a balcony in the vertical society 2 feet away. Humans decided that to live together was better for self-preservation, and then gave up some personal freedom to ‘adjust’ to the crowd.
        Which ‘crowd of thought’ they choose – after reading history – is about the education. But if all the choices are not known, the individual may well be convinced that ‘ending it all’ for a god is the greatest thing he can do. And eliminating several thousand is fine, in many minds, since they were told that their ‘souls’ will be in a better place … and certainly living in constant danger of starvation, because the crowd is too big anyway, leads to dreams of something ‘better’ … people CAN be convinced to ‘go out with a bang’ – and taking a few with them is ok because it’s like doing them a favour. Even if others don’t know it, they will thank you ‘on the other side’ of that lovely cloud.
        The El Supremos – who may very well have convinced themselves there is a ‘better place’ – are happy enough to have made their own space, and have food always on the table. That it would all be irradiated is something they hadn’t been educated to consider.

      2. They (Iran and friends like Assad and Hezbollah) are already killing so many Sunnis in Syria and they are still making excuses by blaming Israel. If Iran liberated Palestine, do you really think that the Sunnis would be better off than those in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon who are suffering under the Shia Iranian/Assad/Hezbollah boot there? Who are they fooling? Their resistance against Israel is a cover and excuse for the Shia Iranian oppression of Sunni Arabs in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, etc.

  5. Maborlz Ez-Hari Avatar
    Maborlz Ez-Hari

    The most significant historical mistake in recent times occurred in 1948.

    1. Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel Avatar
      Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel

      Yes, when five Arab armies attacked Israel.

    2. It occurred in 1916 with the Great Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Empire.

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Or, we could all have been Romans ….
        Recent antiquity finds, with bit’s of accumulated history notes, and more knowledge of weather anomalies, bring better light onto HOW ‘the barbarians’ of Germanic persuasion eliminated 3 Well-equiped Roman Legions (an impossibility of that era) in the forests of central Europe during a three-day battle in a really bad storm of a type that tends to blow in from the Atlantic on occasion. A disaster of civilization, one might say, that created a ‘red-line’ beyond which Civilized Rome dared not go, out of basic fear of the ‘gods’ they did not know. They also did not realize that ONE man had managed to unite the barbarians ONE time against them, because he had been ‘conscripted’ from his mother’s arms and educated in Roman ways – which ticked him off for life. The ‘Perfect Storm’ occurring at the right time was an ‘Omen’ to Rome.
        (People like Wargame would have loved the prophecies … πŸ˜‰
        And thus ‘the barbarians’ – actually never united again for another few centuries – had unwittingly kept Rome from further conquests in that direction, and from spreading their ‘civilization’ in a direction which may never have produced a ‘Hitler’ or a ‘Stalin’ (or many other European ‘greats’) if the Romans had simply taken another shot at it.
        History is filled with ‘What Ifs’ … but it IS the past.
        Why some people keep trying to have it come back is the Greatest Mystery of All.
        Going Back to a Future is a nice story – makes money for movie producers.

  6. Maborlz Ez-Hari Avatar
    Maborlz Ez-Hari

    The most significant historical mistake in recent times occurred in 1948.

    1. Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel Avatar
      Adam Yonatan Ben Yoel

      Yes, when five Arab armies attacked Israel.

    2. It occurred in 1916 with the Great Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Empire.

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Or, we could all have been Romans ….
        Recent antiguity finds, with bit’s of accumulated history notes, and more knowledge of weather anomalies, bring better light onto HOW ‘the barbarians’ of Germanic persuasion eliminated 3 Well-equiped Roman Legions (an impossibility of that era) in the forests of central Europe during a three-day battle in a really bad storm of a type that tends to blow in from the Atlantic on occasion. A disaster of civilization, one might say, that created a ‘red-line’ beyond which Civilized Rome dared not go, out of basic fear of the ‘gods’ they did not know. They also did not realize that ONE man had managed to unite the barbarians ONE time against them, because he had been ‘conscripted’ from his mother’s arms and educated in Roman ways – which ticked him off for life. The ‘Perfect Storm’ occurring at the right time was an ‘Omen’ to Rome.
        (People like Wargame would have loved the prophecies … πŸ˜‰
        And thus ‘the barbarians’ – actually never united again for another few centuries – had unwittingly kept Rome from further conquests in that direction, and from spreading their ‘civilization’ in a direction which may never have produced a ‘Hitler’ or a ‘Stalin’ (or many other European ‘greats’) if the Romans had simply taken another shot at it.
        History is filled with ‘What Ifs’ … but it IS the past.
        Why some people keep trying to have it come back is the Greatest Mystery of All.
        Going Back to a Future is a nice story – makes money for movie producers.

Leave a Reply