McCain blasts U.S. policy on Syria, says Assad won’t end war

Share:

mccain brooking instituteSyrian President Bashar Assad will not end the two-year-old civil war that has killed more than 80,000 Syrians as long as he is winning on the battlefield, and anyone who thinks otherwise is “delusional,” Sen. John McCain said Thursday.

In a major foreign policy speech at the Brookings Institution in Washington, Mr. McCain called on the Obama administration to renew U.S. leadership in the Middle East and develop a credible Syria strategy.

“The longer we wait to take action, the more action we will have to take,” the Arizona Republican said, while conceding that there are no easy options to ending the war in Syria.

Mr. McCain said he favors a negotiated end to the war, but “anyone who thinks that Assad and his allies will ever make peace when they are winning on the battlefield is delusional.”

An international peace conference, backed by the U.S. and Russia and scheduled to be held in Geneva this month, has been postponed to July. The Assad regime says it will attend the conference; the Syrian opposition says it will not.

The regime’s military, supported by Lebanese Hezbollah militants, dealt a significant blow Wednesday to the rebels by seizing the strategic town of Qusair near the Lebanon border.

Mr. McCain said Syria’s civil war is stoking sectarian conflict across the region, a dangerous situation that Iran is exploiting.

“A sectarian battle line is being drawn through the heart of the region — with Sunni extremists, many allied with al Qaeda, dominant on one side, and Iranian-backed proxy forces dominant on the other,” he said. “The entire Middle East is now up for grabs, and our enemies are fully committed to winning … The only power that is not fully committed in this struggle is us.”

Last week, Mr. McCain visited Yemen, Jordan and Turkey, and became the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit Syria since the start of the war in March 2011.

In Syria, he met with the rebels’ top military commander, Gen. Salim Idris, and more than a dozen senior Free Syrian Army commanders in southern Turkey and northern Syria. He said they all told him: “Assad has turned the tide of battle on the ground. His foreign allies have all doubled down on him. Iran is all in. Russia is all in. Shia militants are flowing into the fight from Iraq. And Hezbollah fighters have invaded Syria by the thousands.”

“Every day this conflict grinds on, these extremists are marginalizing moderate leaders like the commanders I met last week — Syrians who don’t want to trade Assad for al-Nusrah,” he said, referring to the al Qaeda-affiliated terrorist group that is fighting against the regime’s forces inside Syria.

Mr. McCain said the U.S. must do more to help the rebels, but that doesn’t mean deploying U.S. troops to Syria or destroying all of the Assad regime’s network of air-defense systems.

Instead, cruise missiles could destroy the regime’s aircraft and ballistic missile launchers; a safe zone could be established on the ground, protected by Patriot missiles, from where the opposition could govern; and a full-scale effort could be launched to train and arm the rebels, he said.

“Would any of this immediately end the conflict? Probably not. But could it save innocent lives in Syria? Could it give the moderate opposition a better chance to succeed? And could it help to turn the conflict in Syria into a strategic disaster for Iran and Hezbollah? To me, the answer to all of these questions is yes,” he said.

France said this week it had evidence that the nerve agent sarin gas has been used in the conflict. The United Nations reacted cautiously to the French claims citing the “absence of convincing evidence of the chain-of-custody of the data collected.”

Mr. McCain said it is clear that President Obama’s “red line” on the use of chemical weapons inside Syria has been crossed.

“If the United States now signals that it is unwilling or unable to meet its own stated commitments and enforce its own declared red lines, that message will be heard loud and clear, far beyond the Middle East,” he said. “It will demoralize our friends, embolden our enemies, and make our world a far more dangerous place for us.”

“If the United States now signals that it is unwilling or unable to meet its own stated commitments and enforce its own declared red lines, that message will be heard loud and clear, far beyond the Middle East,” he said. “It will demoralize our friends, embolden our enemies, and make our world a far more dangerous place for us.”

Washington Times

Share:

Comments

14 responses to “McCain blasts U.S. policy on Syria, says Assad won’t end war”

  1. Hesperian Avatar
    Hesperian

    Senator McCain
    Maybe the red line he meant is a different Red than the one we know…
    How on a earth this paper tiger think that a Syria and Lebanon controlled by Iran and the other himirs
    Is better off than radical Muslims which is not the case anyway!!!!!!!
    I voted democrat but will not again..

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      McCain is not Democratic ??? :-))))

      1. wargame1 Avatar
        wargame1

        I have a question but I am not looking for a immediate answer. As you know Al-Nusra is Al-Qaeda and inspired by Iman Al Zawaheri. After reading his current speech please tell me What role would Al-Qaeda play in Syria? You better take your time to answer this.

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar
          5thDrawer

          (hmmm … a bottle takes a week (unless it’s a special day) … I have 2 bottles … now … ummm)
          Ok. Catch ya later 😉

  2. Hesperian Avatar
    Hesperian

    Senator McCain
    Maybe the red line he meant is a different Red than the one we know…
    How on a earth this paper tiger think that a Syria and Lebanon controlled by Iran and the other himirs
    Is better off than radical Muslims which is not the case anyway!!!!!!!
    I voted democrat but will not again..

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      McCain is a Democrat ??? :-))))

      1. wargame1 Avatar
        wargame1

        I have a question but I am not looking for a immediate answer. As you know Al-Nusra is Al-Qaeda and inspired by Iman Al Zawaheri. After reading his current speech please tell me What role would Al-Qaeda play in Syria? You better take your time to answer this.

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar
          5thDrawer

          (hmmm … a bottle takes a week (unless it’s a special day) … I have 2 bottles … now … ummm)
          Ok. Catch ya later 😉

  3. wargame1 Avatar
    wargame1

    Iman Al Zawaheri is a Iranian stooge . Lets see his carefully crafted message of Yesterday.The recording came one day after Syrian government forces, backed by Lebanese Hezbollah fighters, captured the border town of Qusair from rebels.

    1. Zawahiri warned Syrians not to play into the hands of the US, which, he said, wanted to turn their Jihad into a “western tool against Iran.”

    2. Ipac Al-Zawaheri said Lions of the Levant, unite around this honourable goal and rise above sectarian affiliations,” .

    3. Zawaheri says….“America, its agents and allies want you to shed your blood and the blood of your children and women to bring down the criminal Baathist regime, and then set up a government loyal to them and to safeguard Israel’s security,”

    4. the conflict in Syria had “revealed the ugly face of Iran” .“There is no solution for Palestine except jihad,” Zawahiri added.

    5. “Every free Muslim in Palestine should unite with his Muslim brothers to implement Sharia (Islamic law) and rule by it, and make it a reference above all references, and to liberate Palestine in order to set up an Islamic state, even if the West hates that and calls it terrorism and extremism,”

    ———————

    So his main concern is Iran whereas Iran is invading Syria and protecting its stooge.”Lions of the Levant” referring to Hezbushaitan asking them to unite ! He is not accusing Hezbushaitan at all knowing full well that they are fighting in Syria. The third point is about America and its agent and they are the one who is fighting Bashar Al-Qaeda and that means the one protecting bashar are good! No mention of Russia Iran and Hezbushaitans direct involvement.He pretty much asked to support Assad regime , according to his saying fall of this regime would bring up another regime loyal to Israel!! So it means this regime is not Loyal to Israel? He also talk about the ugly face of Iran ,well we all have seen it but then why are you suporting Iran? as he said that the USA wanted to turn their Jihad into a “western tool against Iran.” Iran should simply get the hell out of Syria, the Syrian rebels are not fighting in Iran.

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      It’s the never-ending confusion of the relgio-ideology with politics. Ideology never makes good government for ‘all’ peoples if they don’t have the mentality of monks.
      Breaking Syria up into little monasteries with their own bits of turf, like it was before the British gave the place to the French who in turn allowed a forced amalgamation under Baaaathists, might be the best idea … and then let the people decide which ‘sect’ they want to ‘believe’ is best to live with, and they can in turn let the religious despot of the day figure out which other monastery to do trade with … etc, etc, etc.
      Back to the Ottoman’s perhaps, who actually had everyone paying their taxes.
      In 2013 there is a necessity of eliminating a bunch of human bodies to achieve this – and levelling a few towns to clear the space – which also incidentally creates easy rubble to build new monasteries with.
      They are working on it.

      1. wargame1 Avatar
        wargame1

        This will end. The revolution is not a cake walk. This Ipac Al-Zawaheri follow a certain doctrine called “Qutubism” these are sufis and they are placed to destroy the image of the sunnis. You see clearly that he support Iran even after this big mess in Syria. But all along the world media portray this Al-Qaeda as sunni group. It was necessary because the sunnis are resisting the occupation in Afghanistan and in Iraq. Therefore its better to identify the enemy ,so my effort is to clear the smoke screen as I do not like to be blamed for a crime which I didnt commit plus I denounce that crime too. The speech pattern of Ipac al-zawaher is called “reverse Psychology ”

        Reverse psychology is a technique involving the advocacy of a belief or behavior that is opposite to the one desired, with the expectation that this approach will encourage the subject of the persuasion to do what actually is desired: the opposite of what is suggested. This technique relies on the psychological phenomenon of reactance, in which a person has a negative emotional reaction to being persuaded, and thus chooses the option which is being advocated against. Now google “reverse Psychology ” you will find it interesting when read the Zawaheri statement again

  4. wargame1 Avatar
    wargame1

    Iman Al Zawaheri is a Iranian stooge . Lets see his carefully crafted message of Yesterday.The recording came one day after Syrian government forces, backed by Lebanese Hezbollah fighters, captured the border town of Qusair from rebels.

    1. Zawahiri warned Syrians not to play into the hands of the US, which, he said, wanted to turn their Jihad into a “western tool against Iran.”

    2. Ipac Al-Zawaheri said Lions of the Levant, unite around this honourable goal and rise above sectarian affiliations,” .

    3. Zawaheri says….“America, its agents and allies want you to shed your blood and the blood of your children and women to bring down the criminal Baathist regime, and then set up a government loyal to them and to safeguard Israel’s security,”

    4. the conflict in Syria had “revealed the ugly face of Iran” .“There is no solution for Palestine except jihad,” Zawahiri added.

    5. “Every free Muslim in Palestine should unite with his Muslim brothers to implement Sharia (Islamic law) and rule by it, and make it a reference above all references, and to liberate Palestine in order to set up an Islamic state, even if the West hates that and calls it terrorism and extremism,”

    ———————

    So his main concern is Iran whereas Iran is invading Syria and protecting its stooge.”Lions of the Levant” referring to Hezbushaitan asking them to unite ! He is not accusing Hezbushaitan at all knowing full well that they are fighting in Syria. The third point is about America and its agent and they are the one who is fighting Bashar Al-Qaeda. No mention of Russia Iran and Hezbushaitans direct involvement.He pretty much asked to support Assad regime , according to his saying fall of this regime would bring up another regime loyal to Israel!! He also talk about the ugly face of Iran ,well we all have seen it but then why are you suporting Iran? as he said that the USA wanted to turn their Jihad into a “western tool against Iran.”

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      It’s the never-ending confusion of the relgio-ideology with politics. Ideology never makes good government for ‘all’ peoples if they don’t have the mentality of monks.
      Breaking Syria up into little monasteries with their own bits of turf, like it was before the British gave the place to the French who in turn allowed a forced amalgamation under Baaaathists, might be the best idea … and then let the people decide which ‘sect’ they want to ‘believe’ is best to live with, and they can in turn let the religious despot of the day figure out which other monastery to do trade with … etc, etc, etc.
      Back to the Ottoman’s perhaps, who actually had everyone paying their taxes.
      In 2013 there is a necessity of eliminating a bunch of human bodies to achieve this – and levelling a few towns to clear the space – which also creates easy rubble to build new monasteries with.
      They are working on it.

      1. wargame1 Avatar
        wargame1

        This will end. The revolution is not a cake walk. This Ipac Al-Zawaheri follow a certain doctrine called “Qutubism” these are sufis and they are placed to destroy the image of the sunnis. You see clearly that he support Iran even after this big mess in Syria. But all along the world media portray this Al-Qaeda as sunni group. It was necessary because the sunnis are resisting the occupation in Afghanistan and in Iraq. Therefore its better to identify the enemy ,so my effort is to clear the smoke screen as I do not like to be blamed for a crime which I didnt commit plus I denounce that crime too.

Leave a Reply