Iran is a lot more divided now than it was , says Obama

Share:

President Barack Obama said on Monday the United States has a “very good estimate” of Iran’s progress toward processing uranium but has some difficulty keeping track of the political dynamics within the Islamic Republic.

“Do we know all the dynamics inside of Iran? Absolutely not.

And I think one of the difficulties is that Iran itself is a lot more divided now than it was,” Obama told an NBC television interview taped on Sunday and aired on Monday morning.

“You’ve got, you know, the supreme leader contesting the president in some situation. Knowing who is making decisions at any given time inside of Iran is tough. But we do have a pretty good bead on what’s happening with their nuclear program,” he said.

Asked when the U.S. military would have “bunker busting bombs” ready that could hit underground nuclear sites in Iran, Obama said he would not discuss specific military programs or go into details of what the United States’ contingencies were.

“I will say this that we have done extensive planning over the last several years about all our various options in the Gulf. And you know, we are prepared to exercise these options should they, should the need arise,” he said.

Photo: From left: Parliament speaker Ali Larijani, judiciary chief Ayatullah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Supreme Leader Ayatullah Ali Khamenei sit under a portrait of Ayatullah Khomeini during a meeting in Tehran on July 20, 2009. President Obama told NBC on Sunday : “It is tough to know who is making decisions in Iran”

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1912970,00.html#ixzz1lcMHc0N9

Reuters

Share:

Comments

  1. Sebouh80 Avatar

    What about Israel Mr.President. Enough hypocrisy and double standards we know all your dirty tricks starting from Vietnam war to our present times.

    1.  the USA and its client state Israel have done more damage  and created unspeakable crimes and terroism than everyone else put together .now that they have finished with afghanistan and iraq its time to start on iran .remember who sponsored the corrupt puppet state of the Shah ,yes the CIA .get used to it middle east ,the USA and  Israel are todays controllers .

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Big Business and World Economy …. we are ALL into it.

        1.  not by choice unfortunately .the world economy and politics is controlled by a hand full of self interested greedies

        2.  not by choice unfortunately .the world economy and politics is controlled by a hand full of self interested greedies

      2. Sebouh80 Avatar

        Sir,
        Do you really think they are finished with Afghanistan and Iraq? Normally they always leave a trace behind or client regimes to look after their interests.

        Yes they bought the corrupt Shah regime back in 1953 and removed him in 1979 because they feared that he was becoming too powerful in the region. 

        1.  and look what they have now .read robert fisks latest on the independent newspaper .makes for good reading

  2. Sebouh80 Avatar

    What about Israel Mr.President. Enough hypocrisy and double standards we know all your dirty tricks starting from Vietnam war to our present times.

  3.  Avatar

    What about Israel Mr.President. Enough hypocrisy and double standards we know all your dirty tricks starting from Vietnam war to our present times.

    1.  Avatar

       the USA and its client state Israel have done more damage  and created unspeakable crimes and terroism than everyone else put together .now that they have finished with afghanistan and iraq its time to start on iran .remember who sponsored the corrupt puppet state of the Shah ,yes the CIA .get used to it middle east ,the USA and  Israel are todays controllers .

      1.  Avatar

        Big Business and World Economy …. we are ALL into it.

        1.  Avatar

           not by choice unfortunately .the world economy and politics is controlled by a hand full of self interested greedies

      2.  Avatar

        Sir,
        Do you really think they are finished with Afghanistan and Iraq? Normally they always leave a trace behind or client regimes to look after their interests.

        Yes they bought the corrupt Shah regime back in 1953 and removed him in 1979 because they feared that he was becoming too powerful in the region. 

        1.  Avatar

           and look what they have now .read robert fisks latest on the independent newspaper .makes for good reading

    2.  Avatar

       the USA and its client state Israel have done more damage  and created unspeakable crimes and terroism than everyone else put together .now that they have finished with afghanistan and iraq its time to start on iran .remember who sponsored the corrupt puppet state of the Shah ,yes the CIA .get used to it middle east ,the USA and  Israel are todays controllers .

  4. 5thDrawer Avatar

    If your beard isn’t white, you’re just not right. 🙂

  5.  Avatar

    If your beard isn’t white, you’re just not right. 🙂

  6. 4 scums and the devil on top nice shot

  7.  Avatar

    4 scums and the devil on top nice shot

  8. josephphdman Avatar
    josephphdman

    why do,nt the us convince the king of saudi arabia to attack iran,s nuclear facilities , saudi arabia beiing a sunnis dominated they consider shia,s iran as there ennemies , and they fear iran with a nuclear weapons , this way the us avoid confrontation with russia and china over iran ,china and iran there is nothing they could do or they will do against the saudi,s because the saudi,s beiing next door to iran they have the right to defendthemselves.

  9.  Avatar

    why do,nt the us convince the king of saudi arabia to attack iran,s nuclear facilities , saudi arabia beiing a sunnis dominated they consider shia,s iran as there ennemies , and they fear iran with a nuclear weapons , this way the us avoid confrontation with russia and china over iran ,china and iran there is nothing they could do or they will do against the saudi,s because the saudi,s beiing next door to iran they have the right to defendthemselves.

Leave a Reply