Lebanese divided over Arab League vote

Share:

The Lebanese leaders are divided over Lebanon’s vote against the suspension of Syria’s membership in the Arab league.

Lebanon and Yemen were the only countries that voted against the Arab League resolution .

The Arab League voted Saturday to suspend Syria and warned that the country could face sanctions if it did not end its crackdown against anti-government protesters.

The decision was a symbolic blow to a nation that prides itself on being a powerhouse of Arab nationalism.

Violence has continued unabated since Syria agreed on Nov. 2 to an Arab-brokered peace deal that called for the Syria to halt violence against protesters, pull tanks and armored vehicles out of cities, release political prisoners and allow journalists and rights groups into the country.

“Syria is a dear country for all of us and it pains us to make this decision,” the Qatari foreign minister Sheik Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani said. “We hope there will be a brave move from Syria to stop the violence and begin a real dialogue toward real reform.”

The decision comes as November is shaping up to be the bloodiest month yet in Syria’s 8-month-old uprising. More than 250 Syrian civilians have been killed in the past 11 days as the regime besieges the rebellious city of Homs.

shameful decision

many March 14 leaders branded Lebanon’s vote at the Arab League “shameful”

Former Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri said on Saturday on his Twitter page that he is , as a Lebanese citizen, “ashamed” of the government’s position saying it does not represent the will of the Lebanese people.

March 14 MP Marwan Hamadeh on Saturday called on the Lebanese cabinet to “immediately” resign.

He also slammed the Lebanese delegation’s “shameful” position at the Arab League’s meeting in Cairo and criticized President Michel Suleiman, the parliament and the cabinet ministers for embracing such a “shameful position ” .

Mikati, Suleiman try to justify the vote

On the other hand Prime Minister Najib Mikati who considers himself a centrist tried to defend Lebanon’s vote on Sunday during a visit to Tripoli . He said ” Arab countries “understand” Lebanon’s position at the Arab League meeting on Saturday”, National News Agency reported.

“Lebanon’s position regarding what is happening in Syria was taken in a way that takes into consideration the exceptional historic and geographic ties between Lebanon and Syria and which our brotherly Arabs understand.” He added

Mikati added that Arab countries “are aware that Lebanon will stay in contact with Arabs… We want to shield Lebanon from unpredictable risks and we want we stand for humanitarian causes by our brotherly Syrians who fled to Lebanon [without any political motives].”

President Michel Suleiman who recently defended Syria’s incursions into Lebanon and who denied the abductions of Syrian opposition members in Lebanon stressed on Sunday that Lebanon did not oppose the decisions of the Arab League, saying that it refuses the isolation of any country.

He said: “I call on Syrian President Bashar Assad to implement the Arab League initiative.”

March 8 alliance backs vote

Foreign Affairs Minister Adnan Mansour who is a member of the Amal movement a close ally of the Iranian and Syrian backed Hezbollah militant group said on Saturday during the Arab League foreign ministers’ meeting in Cairo that he objected to the League’s decision to suspend Syria because the “decision has dangerous repercussions for Syria and the region.”

Hezbollah MP Ali Moqdad slammed on Sunday the Arab League for its decision to suspend Syria’s membership in the organization, the National News Agency reported.

Moqdad also said Saturday’s Arab League summit was akin to a “Hebrew meeting that has nothing to do with any Arab citizen.”

“We will always resist and fight despite all the Hebrew summit’s plots against us,” he added.

Share:

Comments

23 responses to “Lebanese divided over Arab League vote”

  1. Which Lebanese support the massacre of the Syrian people? I am sure HA the puppet but no Lebanese will wish harm to our Syrian  brothers. Mikati and Suleiman doesnot represent the people anymore

    1. Disappointing that Tripoli did not protest today’s visit on the heels of the NO vote.
      Especially visit to justice palace, what a sick joke.

      1. Not a criticism of Tripoli but an indictment of the very difficult situation, god help them most people are more worried about surviving.

        1. antar2011 Avatar

          even if, the tripolians should be the first lebanese to booooooooo the president and the prime miniser on their shameful silent agreement over lebanon’s position towards syrian pple. because they have suffered most and continue to suffer from the criminal tyrant Bashaar. Allah yekhdouuu

        2. 5thDrawer Avatar

          True enough … even the babies left on the street have survival problems.

      2. antar2011 Avatar

        it is indeed a big slap to the pple of tripoli from it son…najeeb Mikati and from the president of Lebanon…
        it has been many years since a lebanese president has set foot in tripoli…so why now?

        what is the real reason for such a visit?
        this question leads me to be more angry at the way these politicians and the president himself belittle lebanese minds. ikhhht tfouuu 3alayon.

  2.  Avatar

    Which Lebanese support the massacre of the Syrian people? I am sure HA the puppet but no Lebanese will wish harm to our Syrian  brothers. Mikati and Suleiman doesnot represent the people anymore

    1.  Avatar

      Disappointing that Tripoli did not protest today’s visit on the heels of the NO vote.
      Especially visit to justice palace, what a sick joke.

      1. Not a criticism of Tripoli but an indictment of the very difficult situation, god help them most people are more worried about surviving.

        1.  Avatar

          even if, the tripolians should be the first lebanese to booooooooo the president and the prime miniser on their shameful silent agreement over lebanon’s position towards syrian pple. because they have suffered most and continue to suffer from the criminal tyrant Bashaar. Allah yekhdouuu

        2.  Avatar

          True enough … even the babies left on the street.

      2.  Avatar

        it is indeed a big slap to the pple of tripoli from it son…najeeb Mikati and from the president of Lebanon…
        it has been many years since a lebanese president has set foot in tripoli…so why now?

        what is the real reason for such a visit?
        this question leads me to be more angry at the way these politicians and the president himself belittle lebanese minds. ikhhht tfouuu 3alayon.

  3. LOL, 
    Iranian Agents want to teach us about Arabism.

    1. antar2011 Avatar

      eih wallah

      you hit the nail on the head

  4.  Avatar

    LOL, 
    Iranian Agents want to teach us about Arabism.

    1.  Avatar

      eih wallah

      you hit the nail on the head

  5. beyondreason1022 Avatar
    beyondreason1022

    Lebanese divided my A$$, they will change their minds when they know how much SA will pay more! it is all about “What’s in It For ME ? show me the money kind attitude. 

  6.  Avatar

    Lebanese divided my A$$, they will change their minds when they know how much SA will pay more! it is all about “What’s in It For ME ? show me the money kind attitude. 

  7. This will always happen when one group tries to control foreign policy !It cannot be imposed by force!Foreign policy in Lebanon has always been a problem and the cause of instability and civil strife.Therefore the various groups have to agree ( like so many have said before ,for example ¨Hourani¨) on a foreign policy that is acceptable to all !Otherwise the danger is always present !Lebanon has to exist independently and not part of any alliance that would endanger its very existence!!!

  8.  Avatar

    This will always happen when one group tries to control foreign policy !It cannot be imposed by force!Foreign policy in Lebanon has always been a problem and the cause of instability and civil strife.Therefore the various groups have to agree ( like so many have said before ,for example ¨Hourani¨) on a foreign policy that is acceptable to all !Otherwise the danger is always present !Lebanon has to exist independently and not part of any alliance that would endanger its very existence!!!

  9.  Avatar

    This will always happen when one group tries to control foreign policy !It cannot be imposed by force!Foreign policy in Lebanon has always been a problem and the cause of instability and civil strife.Therefore the various groups have to agree ( like so many have said before ,for example ¨Hourani¨) on a foreign policy that is acceptable to all !Otherwise the danger is always present !Lebanon has to exist independently and not part of any alliance that would endanger its very existence!!!

  10. 5thDrawer Avatar

    Ah yes … nice how Moqdad manages to twist something about Jews into the whole thing. As if the Israelis called the Arabs together. THERE is a monkey’s tongue, that racist bastard. Wonder when he was last at a ‘Hebrew meeting’ ??

  11.  Avatar

    Ah yes … nice how Moqdad manages to twist something about Jews into the whole thing. As if the Israelis called the Arabs together. THERE is a monkey’s tongue, that racist bastard. Wonder when he was last at a ‘Hebrew meeting’ ??

Leave a Reply