Before World War II, Americans didn’t want Jewish refugees too

Share:
FILE - In this file photo of June 1, 1939, the German liner St. Louis is denied entrance to the Havana, Cuba harbor. The ship, carrying 917 German Jewish refugees, was later denied entrance to the United States and returned to Hamburg, Germany.  A new book disputes widely held assumptions that President Franklin D. Roosevelt was insensitive to the plight of European Jews under the Nazis, and instead concludes that he tried to arrange resettlement for thousands of refugees in the late 1930s, only to be thwarted by his own State Department. (AP Photo, file)
FILE – In this file photo of June 1, 1939, the German liner St. Louis is denied entrance to the Havana, Cuba harbor. The ship, carrying 917 German Jewish refugees, was later denied entrance to the United States and returned to Hamburg, Germany. A new book disputes widely held assumptions that President Franklin D. Roosevelt was insensitive to the plight of European Jews under the Nazis, and instead concludes that he tried to arrange resettlement for thousands of refugees in the late 1930s, only to be thwarted by his own State Department. (AP Photo, file)

The resistance to allowing Syrian refugees into the United States in light of the terrorist attacks in Paris echoes the concerns expressed by many Americans about accepting Jewish refugees before and during World War II.

Polls taken in 1938 and 1939 found that the majority of citizens did not want the government to allow refugees from Europe to settle in the United States. Multiple polls from the time period were tweeted Monday by an account called Historical Opinion, which shares historical polls and surveys.

One of the polls, published in Fortune magazine in July 1938, asked participants, “What is your attitude toward allowing German, Austrian and other political refugees to come to the U.S.?”

More than half of those polled, 67.4%, chose the response, “With the conditions as they are, we should try to keep them out.” About 23% said the country should accept refugees, but many of those said they would only agree if it would not raise the immigration quota.

Conducted by the American Institute of Public Opinion (which later became Gallup), the survey was conducted after Kristallnacht, or the “Night of Broken Glass,” a violent attack on Jews in Germany.

Polling methodology at the time was less exact than it is today, but anti-Semitism was prevalent during the run-up to World War II, historians say, and contributed to the hesitation about accepting Jewish refugees.

Also in 1939, the SS St Louis, a ship carrying over 900 Jewish refugees, arrived on the coast of Florida after being rejected by Cuban officials. The United States also refused to let it dock, and the captain was forced to take the ship back to Europe, where Belgium, France, Holland and the United Kingdom took in the refugees.
During the war, many Americans expressed concern that refugees could be secretly associated with the Nazis.

“Once the United States entered World War II, the State Department practiced stricter immigration policies out of fear that refugees could be blackmailed into working as agents for Germany,” the United State Holocaust Memorial Museum website says.

A column in the Saturday Evening Post in March 1941 expressed that view as well, warning that “disguised as refugees, Nazi agents have penetrated all over the world, as spies, fifth columnists, propagandists or secret commercial agents.”

Such fears have been echoed by a number of elected officials since the terrorist attacks in Paris on Friday. Many Republicans and some Democrats have said the U.S. should not accept Syrian refugees for fear that ISIS affiliates could enter the country hidden among the migrants.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll released Monday found 52% of Americans believe countries where Syrian refugees are accepted are less safe. Forty percent said those countries should continue to accept refugees, while 41% said they should stop accepting them. The poll did not ask specifically about the United States.

The State Department has said it will move forward with the plan to accept 10,000 Syrian refugees in the next year.

Before the Paris attacks, a Pew Research Poll found that 51% of Americans approved of the government’s decision to increase the number of refugees accepted into the country.

Many of those who support continuing the refugee program argue that those leaving Syria are fleeing terrorism themselves.

But, history shows, it may be a while before the public fully supports an influx of refugees. During World War II, the United States only took concrete steps to help Jewish refugees after Americans became fully aware of the genocide taking place in Europe. Near the end of the war, in 1944, President Franklin D. Roosevelt set up the War Refugee Board to help Jews escape to the United States.
MSNBC

This is to remind all our readers to respect the community . Comments that contain personal attacks or inappropriate language will be removed.

For those who are new to this site please note that Ya Libnan is all about fixing Lebanon.

We want our readers to come up with ideas that if implemented will make lebanon a better country.

Ya Libnan is a democratic venue that is open to anyone wishing to contribute any ideas to improve Lebanon. Our only wish is to maintain the civility of the discussions and that is why those who have not been able to abide by this rule have been banned from participating in this forum . We don’t want or expect anything from anyone …better lebanon is the only reward we seek. Help us get there!

Share:

Comments

13 responses to “Before World War II, Americans didn’t want Jewish refugees too”

  1. 5thDrawer Avatar

    Well, well .. another Poll that didn’t ask anything about Jews … only Germans and Austrians, etc.
    They didn’t want the Irish either at one point in time.
    Gotta love how ‘Charts&Graphs’ can be re-worked …

    1. Lol the religious bigot at work
      Did you wish your wife well?

  2. Nobody was worried that the reason Jewish refugees would be fleeing Europe was to BLOW THE AMERICANS UP IN THEIR OWN STADIUMS!

    And with that…. this mockery of an analogy dies.

    1. The mockery is you!

      “A column in the Saturday Evening Post in March 1941 expressed that view as well, warning that “disguised as refugees, Nazi agents have penetrated all over the world, as spies, fifth columnists, propagandists or secret commercial agents.””

      You disgusting religious bigot and racist retard

    2. And add more mockery to your mockery!

      “The King David Hotel bombing was an attack carried out on Monday July 22, 1946 by the militant Zionist underground organization Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.”

    3. “The King David Hotel explosion of July 22, 1946
      (Palestine), which resulted in the deaths of 92 Britons, Arabs and Jews,
      and in the wounding of 58, was not just an act of “Jewish
      extremists,” but a premeditated massacre conducted by the Irgun in
      agreement with the highest Jewish political authorities in Palestine–
      the Jewish Agency and its head David-Ben-Gurion. ”

      Maybe not stadiums but certainly hotels, amongst other things.
      See how stupid you are? If you had kept your disgusting religious bigotry to yourself, you wouldn’t have exposed yourself.

  3. Ya Libnan
    ver.
    HAARETZ

    Coincidence or plagiarism of the same theme…..
    “For U.S. Jews, a Double-edged Holocaust Precedent to Syrian Refugee Clash” – Citation of the comment by Waheed Raza Ahmed.
    “Syrian Refugee Crises and the similarities of the Jewish Refugee Crises

    It makes great sense that those of the Jewish Community are vocal and involved in the promotion for granting refuge to the Syrians whom sadly find themselves squeezed between the Assad regime and ISIS, now not to mention the bombings from UK, France, USA, Russia and now even the Iranians. It is a sad time in human history that after the appalling ways in which the Jews were treated in the holocaust we, after having formed the UN and other collective agencies as a direct result of the holocaust and the wars, still see a massive link where there is almost little changed in terms of the humanity displayed in those whom are refusing or rejection sanctuary to the aggrieved refugees! It is however rewarding to see that Jews are opposed to this clearly degrading and inhumane conduct and that Jewish parties are standing up for the Syrians. I hope that the Israel-Palestine issue clears up quickly also in a peaceful manner with no one hurting anyone nor no one insulting anyone, peace will always grant further life for mankind and through empathy and brotherhood it is always possible to overcome all grievances.”

    read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.687006#article-comments

  4. 5thDrawer Avatar

    Forget the past … Here’s today’s ‘Vetting Process’ …. tough enough.
    http://en.annahar.com/article/285764-things-to-know-about-syrian-refugees-and-the-vetting-process

  5. “Arabs/Muslims are the new Jews.” I’m starting to shed my obligatory tear, but then I recall that, in fact, said Jews are the Devil’s spawn, as the “Resistance” so wisely teaches us. So now I’m feeling confused. I guess I should consult the resident philosophers from Al-Akhbar for an appropriate solution to this dilemma.

  6. Patience2 Avatar

    And look what’s happened……..

Leave a Reply