Syrian attacks fuel fears of sectarian war

Share:

The Syrian regime marked the first day of the holy month of Ramadan with more strikes on restive towns, raising pressure for international action and provoking accusations of a sectarian war against the country’s majority Sunni Arab population.

Security forces pursued their bombardment of the city of Hama, where at least 80 people were killed on Sunday, with the crackdown also continuing in the eastern oil-producing town of Deir Ezzor and reaching Al Bukamal near the Iraqi border, according to activists.

The town of Zabadani, a protest hotspot close to Damascus, was reported to be under military siege. At least eight people were estimated to have been killed in Monday’s violence.

As world powers prepared for a meeting of the UN Security Council, where Russia has so far blocked condemnation of its ally in Damascus, the European Union added five new names to its list of Syrian officials subject to asset freezes and travel bans.

Even Moscow warned the Syrian regime on Monday against the use of force on civilians. In Turkey, an increasingly frustrated ally of Syria, President Abdullah Gul said the images from Hama on Sunday had “horrified us”.

Protesters in Hama, site of a 1982 massacre by President Bashar al-Assad’s father that residents thought would never be repeated, remained defiant however.

For the past month the city had been left alone by security forces, staging some of the largest peaceful demonstrations in the four-and-a-half-month uprising and undermining the regime’s narrative that it is fighting armed gangs.

As Ramadan dawned across Syria on Monday, the military moved in to position for another attack on Hama.

“This morning at 7.30 suddenly the city was bombed,” said Omar Habbal, an activist. “It was a very big bombardment which continued for 20-25 minutes.”

According to Mr Habbal, many of the city’s barricades, taken down by security forces on Sunday, have been rebuilt.

“We won’t give up because we have got a very big lesson from [the southern province of] Deraa, where they [the regime] took the boys and killed them and took them to mass graves.”

With a youth-led protest movement defying the regime’s crackdown, Mr Assad has apparently decided on a major assault to regain the initiative and crush activists’ plans to step up their popular campaign during Ramadan, when people congregate in mosques for evening prayers, a usual point of departure for many demonstrations.

Activists have also been encouraging protests during Ramadan in Damascus and Aleppo, the two major cities that have so far remained largely outside the protest movement.

In a letter to the army, Mr Assad repeated the regime’s claim that Syria was facing a foreign conspiracy designed to sow sectarian strife and “tear Syria into small statelets that compete to satisfy those who worked to slice them up”.

Opposition activists, however, say it is the regime, dominated by the Alawite minority in a majority Sunni country, that has been deliberately stoking sectarian tensions to maintain the loyalty of minorities and raise the spectre of civil chaos.

Arab television stations have been broadcasting the unforgettable spectacle of mosque minarets with clouds of smoke over them in the conservative Sunni city of Hama on the eve of the holy month of fasting.

The Muslim Brotherhood, whose Syrian branch, which is banned inside the country has hitherto been very careful not to play up the sectarian aspect of the crackdown, issued a statement saying Syria was witnessing “a war of sectarian cleansing”.

“The regime has linked its open annihilation with the crescent of Ramadan. It is a war on the identity and beliefs of the Syrian nation . . . on Arab Muslim Syria,” said the Brotherhood statement, reported by Reuters news agency.

Activists and analysts believe the escalating crackdown will prove counterproductive, just as previous attacks on other cities injected new momentum into the uprising.

“It an act of frustration and despair,” said Hilal Khashan, a professor of political science at the American University of Beirut. “[Assad] knows it will backfire.”

Wissam Tarif, a human rights activist based outside of Syria, said the question was whether the regime was willing to kill many more people to disrupt the protests, especially in Hama. In Ramadan, says Mr Tarif “every casualty will be emphasised – that’s what the protesters are betting on”.

FT

Share:

Comments

20 responses to “Syrian attacks fuel fears of sectarian war”

  1. persepoliswarrior Avatar
    persepoliswarrior

    I get the impression that many minorities fear a post-Assad Syria would mean religious minorities (Christians, Alawites, Druze, etc) would be treated as second-class citizens since Sunnis hold a majority.  I hope this would not happen.  I believe all the Syrian people, regardless of religious sect, should come together to form a new and free Syria that will preserve the diverse framework of the country.  It is time for this dictator to go.  His actions have proved his true intentions.  He only wants power and could care the least about justice and liberty for his people. 

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      ‘Liberty’ has many meanings in this part of the world … Hezzys want to force their version on you, for instance.

  2.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    I get the impression that many minorities fear a post-Assad Syria would mean religious minorities (Christians, Alawites, Druze, etc) would be treated as second-class citizens since Sunnis hold a majority.  I hope this would not happen.  I believe all the Syrian people, regardless of religious sect, should come together to form a new and free Syria that will preserve the diverse framework of the country.  It is time for this dictator to go.  His actions have proved his true intentions.  He only wants power and could care the least about justice and liberty for his people. 

    1.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      ‘Liberty’ has many meanings in this part of the world … Hezzys want to force their version on you, for instance.

  3. i like this banner al assad kill freedom with tanks and you did the same for the lebanese people you scum back you deserve every single bullet and shell enjoy as much as you could

  4. i like this banner al assad kill freedom with tanks and you did the same for the lebanese people you scum back you deserve every single bullet and shell enjoy as much as you could

  5. antar2011 Avatar
    antar2011

    how could any lebanese wish evil upon an innocent syrian citizen who is opposing the very regime that had killed our families, destroys our homes and jobs and made sure or future is bleak, is beyond me.

    and as for the actions for this regime and in ramadan well…. i am lost for words to describe his actions….subhanAllah, May Allah have mercy on the victims and eliminate their oppressor in this holy month when no duaa from a sincere muslim will be left unanswered….ameen

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      I guess if he collects enough gold from people’s houses, there’s always the ‘blood-money’ gambit people seem to love … in place of simple justice.

      1. antar2011 Avatar
        antar2011

        i will give you th ebenefit of the doubt and assume your non sarcasm in your statement about the blood money.
        you must learn what is the main purpose of blood money first before you actually take a jugment if it ia a just or if it is unjust thing.

        it is not the place here to explain in detail the purpose of blood money in an islamic perspective but what is evident is you lack full understanding of it and so i beg you to stop using religious technical terms without knowing what they are if you do have respect the religious in this forum…. but if you do not then that’s another story. 

        if you understan what is the purpose of blood money from an islamic point of view then you would know that blood money is the most merciful, manner justice can take place.

        but i wish that any comments in this forum is to be about politics without resorting to blanket statement about religion…any religion in general especially when being told on more then one occasion these politicians who are acting in the name of religion have nothing to do with what the religion actually says.

        then it is only useless to take a swipe [even a hidden one] at the religion each of these politicians represent…. this manner if anything it is disrespect that you claim you don’t have to other human beings.

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar
          5thDrawer

          Oh, no sarcasm … deadly serious … you are sensitive perhaps … the world is full of people paying fines for doing things against human and humanitarian laws. Many people of many religions attempt to pay for their sins – and I say attempt because it is only a token of the justice sane people no longer wish to mete out – that old ‘eye for an eye’ line is wearing thin in many places ( I think fortunately – although we see it still), and money is given for ‘pain and suffering’ to those so afflicted.
          Usually it is extracted only from those who are found guilty, of course – it is extremely rare to find someone who runs up to a mother and says ‘I stole your son, so here’s some money’. (We can discuss the ‘pre-buy’ of slavery another time.)
          Does the money replace the son in the heart of the mother?  A token of blood is nothing more than a human admittance that taking more blood does nothing worthwhile and only creates grieving in other hearts.  Forgiveness comes from the heart (mind), not the pocket. Yet it shows the sympathy of the society to the mother’s plight.

          Despots can often pay enough to enough people to allow them to slink away – perhaps to a comfortable hole instead of a jail. I am hoping in Assad’s case he may have trouble collecting enough.

          1. antar2011 Avatar
            antar2011

            again you are getting the whole idea of blood money muddled up. it is there for a merciful reason and a better alternative.

            something to note before you take into account the blood money issue:

            1-in islam, murder is murder regardless of any reason and so he or she must face the punishment.

            2- punishments are only a part of a whole. they cannot be properly understood nor successfully implemented IN ISOLATION.

            3- in Islam, all men and women’s religious duty is to aid, to exhort, and to commend each other to do good
            and to avoid evil. it is the responsibility of every institution of society to morally develop every person
            from the cradle to the grave.

            4- you have mentioned something about “eye for an eye’ which is, in islam, the principle of qisaas.
            it is important to realise that the right of Qisaas belongs to individuals, not society nor the state.

            REMEMBER; these laws are implemented in a society that is much different [and spiritualy higher] than
            modern day ones.[not to think in islotation!]

            however, islam does not sate that an individual can take the law into his or her own hands but there is
            a way that the injured person may forgo his right of qisaas by forgiving, or may agree to accept a ‘blood money”. of course the act of forgiving is highly reccommended and encouraged.

            …. Very few realize that the principle of qisaas even allows capital punishment to be avoided…..

            so there are strict punishments but there are ususally the last resort since the reccommendation for
            compassion, avoiding and eschewing evil rather then getting a high from the need to flog and stone.

            a benefit i can see clearly in qisaas is that the punishment is swiftly over; on many occasions without
            lengthy public stigma to the guilty person which they would have had to endure in the case of a prison
            sentence at the end of a trial. in that case i can see that these hudud/punishments enhances the
            individual’s dignity and stature in society rather then diminishes it.

            Sentences in Islam are certainly harsh, but the things a person must observe before a person may be
            convicted are even more strict and severe…in a society where all aspects of Shariah is implemented and in
            a society which is very different of any at this time.

          2. antar2011 Avatar
            antar2011

            again you are getting the whole idea of blood money muddled up. it is there for a merciful reason and a better alternative.

            something to note before you take into account the blood money issue:

            1-in islam, murder is murder regardless of any reason and so he or she must face the punishment.

            2- punishments are only a part of a whole. they cannot be properly understood nor successfully implemented IN ISOLATION.

            3- in Islam, all men and women’s religious duty is to aid, to exhort, and to commend each other to do good
            and to avoid evil. it is the responsibility of every institution of society to morally develop every person
            from the cradle to the grave.

            4- you have mentioned something about “eye for an eye’ which is, in islam, the principle of qisaas.
            it is important to realise that the right of Qisaas belongs to individuals, not society nor the state.

            REMEMBER; these laws are implemented in a society that is much different [and spiritualy higher] than
            modern day ones.[not to think in islotation!]

            however, islam does not sate that an individual can take the law into his or her own hands but there is
            a way that the injured person may forgo his right of qisaas by forgiving, or may agree to accept a ‘blood money”. of course the act of forgiving is highly reccommended and encouraged.

            …. Very few realize that the principle of qisaas even allows capital punishment to be avoided…..

            so there are strict punishments but there are ususally the last resort since the reccommendation for
            compassion, avoiding and eschewing evil rather then getting a high from the need to flog and stone.

            a benefit i can see clearly in qisaas is that the punishment is swiftly over; on many occasions without
            lengthy public stigma to the guilty person which they would have had to endure in the case of a prison
            sentence at the end of a trial. in that case i can see that these hudud/punishments enhances the
            individual’s dignity and stature in society rather then diminishes it.

            Sentences in Islam are certainly harsh, but the things a person must observe before a person may be
            convicted are even more strict and severe…in a society where all aspects of Shariah is implemented and in
            a society which is very different of any at this time.

  6. antar2011 Avatar
    antar2011

    how could any lebanese wish evil upon an innocent syrian citizen who is opposing the very regime that had killed our families, destroys our homes and jobs and made sure or future is bleak, is beyond me.

    and as for the actions for this regime and in ramadan well…. i am lost for words to describe his actions….subhanAllah, May Allah have mercy on the victims and eliminate their oppressor in this holy month when no duaa from a sincere muslim will be left unanswered….ameen

  7.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    how could any lebanese wish evil upon an innocent syrian citizen who is opposing the very regime that had killed our families, destroys our homes and jobs and made sure or future is bleak, is beyond me.

    and as for the actions for this regime and in ramadan well…. i am lost for words to describe his actions….subhanAllah, May Allah have mercy on the victims and eliminate their oppressor in this holy month when no duaa from a sincere muslim will be left unanswered….ameen

    1.  Avatar
      Anonymous

      I guess if he collects enough gold from people’s houses, there’s always the ‘blood-money’ gambit people seem to love … 

      1.  Avatar
        Anonymous

        i will give you th ebenefit of the doubt and assume your non sarcasm in your statement about the blood money.
        you must learn what is the main purpose of blood money first before you actually take a jugment if it ia a just or if it is unjust thing.

        it is not the place here to explain in detail the purpose of blood money in an islamic perspective but what is evident is you lack full understanding of it and so i beg you to stop using religious technical terms without knowing what they are if you do have respect the religious in this forum…. but if you do not then that’s another story. 

        if you understan what is the purpose of blood money from an islamic point of view then you would know that blood money is the most merciful, manner justice can take place.

        but i wish that any comments in this forum is to be about politics without resorting to blanket statement about religion…any religion in general especially when being told on more then one occasion these politicians who are acting in the name of religion have nothing to do with what the religion actually says.

        then it is only useless to take a swipe [even a hidden one] at the religion each of these politicians represent…. this manner if anything it is disrespect that you claim you don’t have to other human beings.

        1.  Avatar
          Anonymous

          Oh, no sarcasm … deadly serious … you are sensitive perhaps … the world is full of people paying fines for doing things against human and humanitarian laws. Many people of many religions attempt to pay for their sins – and I say attempt because it is only a token of the justice sane people no longer wish to mete out – that old ‘eye for an eye’ line is wearing thin in many places ( I think fortunately – although we see it still), and money is given for ‘pain and suffering’ to those so afflicted.
          Usually it is extracted only from those who are found guilty, of course – it is extremely rare to find someone who runs up to a mother and says ‘I stole your son, so here’s some money’. (We can discuss the ‘pre-buy’ of slavery another time.)
          Does the money replace the son in the heart of the mother?  A token of blood is nothing more than a human admittance that taking more blood does nothing worthwhile and only creates grieving in other hearts.  Forgiveness comes from the heart (mind), not the pocket. Yet it shows the sympathy of the society to the mother’s plight.

          Despots can often pay enough to enough people to allow them to slink away – perhaps to a comfortable hole instead of a jail. I am hoping in Assad’s case he may have trouble collecting enough.

          1.  Avatar
            Anonymous

            again you are getting the whole idea of blood money muddled up. it is there for a merciful reason and a better alternative.

            something to note before you take into account the blood money issue:

            1-in islam, murder is murder regardless of any reason and so he or she must face the punishment.

            2- punishments are only a part of a whole. they cannot be properly understood nor successfully implemented IN ISOLATION.

            3- in Islam, all men and women’s religious duty is to aid, to exhort, and to commend each other to do good
            and to avoid evil. it is the responsibility of every institution of society to morally develop every person
            from the cradle to the grave.

            4- you have mentioned something about “eye for an eye’ which is, in islam, the principle of qisaas.
            it is important to realise that the right of Qisaas belongs to individuals, not society nor the state.

            REMEMBER; these laws are implemented in a society that is much different [and spiritualy higher] than
            modern day ones.[not to think in islotation!]

            however, islam does not sate that an individual can take the law into his or her own hands but there is
            a way that the injured person may forgo his right of qisaas by forgiving, or may agree to accept a ‘blood money”. of course the act of forgiving is highly reccommended and encouraged.

            …. Very few realize that the principle of qisaas even allows capital punishment to be avoided…..

            so there are strict punishments but there are ususally the last resort since the reccommendation for
            compassion, avoiding and eschewing evil rather then getting a high from the need to flog and stone.

            a benefit i can see clearly in qisaas is that the punishment is swiftly over; on many occasions without
            lengthy public stigma to the guilty person which they would have had to endure in the case of a prison
            sentence at the end of a trial. in that case i can see that these hudud/punishments enhances the
            individual’s dignity and stature in society rather then diminishes it.

            Sentences in Islam are certainly harsh, but the things a person must observe before a person may be
            convicted are even more strict and severe…in a society where all aspects of Shariah is implemented and in
            a society which is very different of any at this time.

  8. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    BEIRUT News:  Tripoli MP Mohammad Kabbara urged the Lebanese to support the Syrian people against President Bashar Assad’s regime and to call on Arab leaders for action and not just talk.Kabbara called on the Lebanese to support the Syrian people against “the great tyrant in Syria and his small tyrants in Lebanon,” in reference to Syrian president Bashar Assad.He also urged Arab leaders to take action “and not just talk.”“Let’s act, all of us, for Arabs to boycott Assad’s regime … and so we can tell the international community that we will not be silent,” Kabbara said.

  9.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    BEIRUT News:  Tripoli MP Mohammad Kabbara urged the Lebanese to support the Syrian people against President Bashar Assad’s regime and to call on Arab leaders for action and not just talk.Kabbara called on the Lebanese to support the Syrian people against “the great tyrant in Syria and his small tyrants in Lebanon,” in reference to Syrian president Bashar Assad.He also urged Arab leaders to take action “and not just talk.”“Let’s act, all of us, for Arabs to boycott Assad’s regime … and so we can tell the international community that we will not be silent,” Kabbara said.

Leave a Reply