UK being sued over the Balfour Declaration “the root of the suffering of the Palestinian people

Share:

By Daoud Kuttab

Londoners mark 100 years since Balfour Declaration in a protest to recognise the on-going oppression of Palestinians and calling for an apology from the British government, in London on November 4, 2017

More than a hundred years after the Balfour Declaration, and the tragedies that befell the Palestinian people under the British Mandate government as a result, Palestinian businessmen and affected citizens intend to file a lawsuit against the UK government. They are demanding an apology, recognition of the State of Palestine and compensation for what Britain caused to happen to the Palestinian people. A Palestinian and international legal team are working away quietly, preparing studies and research for the case, as well as collecting testimonies. The courts in Palestine and Britain will soon begin to deal with a historic case brought by Palestinians against the British government. And why not?

Businessman Munib Al-Masri is one of those who will be filing the lawsuit. He said that the Balfour Declaration is “the root of the suffering of the Palestinian people and paved the way for the violation of their rights and the confiscation of their land and capabilities.” Al-Masri holds responsible “the British government and everyone who participated in the implementation of this permit, the massacres and tragedies that the Palestinian people were subjected to, especially the crime of uprooting and displacing them, which is ongoing.”

A group of families of the victims of the Deir Yassin, Qibya and Al-Dawayima massacres, and others who were affected directly by the crimes committed by the British government during the Mandate era in Palestine, from the early twentieth century to 15 May, 1948 are also participating in the lawsuit. This legal move represents a qualitative addition to the Palestinian struggle that could provide an opportunity to support the cause.

Former Prime Minister Theresa May angered the Palestinians when, on the centenary of the infamous letter in November 2017, she expressed her pride in the Balfour Declaration and the role Britain played in the establishment of the State of Israel. However, what was built on falsehood is inherently false, and experts in international law say that this is a sound basis on which to build the case against the British government for the catastrophe that Britain was instrumental in causing to the Palestinian people, including their displacement from their land. It is expected that the Palestinians’ lawyers will begin by referring to Balfour, and then gradually turn to a group of grave violations and war crimes committed by the British government in Palestine during the Mandate years, which continue to cause harm to the displaced and humiliated Palestinian people living under an unjust occupation created by Britain and its sinister machinations.

A Palestinian demonstrator carries a placard bearing the portrait of former British Prime Minister Arthur Balfour during a demonstration in northern West Bank city of Nablus on 2 November 2017, on the 100th anniversary of Britain’s Balfour Declaration, which helped lead to Israel’s creation and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. [JAAFAR ASHTIYEH/AFP via Getty Images]

Neither the Palestinian Authority nor the Palestine Liberation Organisation are parties to this case. This should help the lawsuit and pre-empt any efforts to disrupt it by putting political and diplomatic pressure on the leadership.

It is not clear whether the Palestinian courts will agree to hear the case. They may, for example, try to get out of it by relying on formalities, such as questions about validity and the statute of limitations. However, the Palestinian and international legal teams say that the fact that Britain and Palestine are signatories to The Hague and Geneva conventions is binding, and that they must bear responsibility for the consequences of those agreements, which deal with the rights of peoples under foreign rule. With regard to any statute of limitations, the damage caused by Balfour and Britain has not stopped; it is ongoing. In any case, international law reserves the statute of limitations for individuals and not for states, which can be sued no matter how much time has passed.

The lawyers are preparing the case in great detail, using several legal and humanitarian sources, including a huge archive at the Palestinian Al-Quds University. Some may consider the case to be decades too late, but better late than never. What is important now is its success in highlighting the grave violations committed by the British government, while also providing a legal and political opportunity for the UK to accept responsibility for what happened and take steps to correct the historical injustice that continues to affect an entire people in the most damaging way imaginable.

If Britain has even the slightest sense of justice, then the least it can do is recognise the Palestinian state on the 1967 borders. As an initial step, that would be a hugely symbolic act of atonement for its past crimes.

Translated from Al Araby Al Jadid, 19 October 2020

MEMO

Share:

Comments

9 responses to “UK being sued over the Balfour Declaration “the root of the suffering of the Palestinian people”

  1. What is the essence of Israel’s peace with Sudan?
    This is the crushing collapse of the notorious “Orab-Israeli conflict” at the symbolic level

    1. According to Ariel Kahana, a journalist for Israel HaYom, as a result of lengthy negotiations between the Trump administration and the interim government of Sudan, this country will be removed from the US list of states supporting terror and normalize its relations with Israel.

      On the eve it became known that a high-ranking Israeli delegation visited the Sudanese capital Khartoum to agree on the details of establishing diplomatic relations

      1. Well-known Israeli orientalist Dr. Gai Behor commented on this situation some time ago:

        Why is it important for Israel to establish a meaningful peace with Sudan? (seven points from Dr. Gai Behor)

        First, it is a symbolic event.

        It was here, in Khartoum, half a century ago (in 1967) that the infamous summit of Orab heads of state was held, convened immediately after the defeat of the Orabs in the Six Day War, at which three famous “no” were nominated:

        – “no” to peace with Israel;
        – “no” to the recognition of Israel;
        – “no” to negotiations with Israel.

        And now, now, the same Khartoum announces three “yes”:

        – “yes” to complete peace with Israel;
        – “yes” to negotiations on expanding cooperation;
        – “yes” to the recognition of Israel as a state of Jews.

        This is the crushing collapse of the notorious “Orab-Israeli conflict” at the symbolic level.

        Furthermore! This is a shock for the leaders of the “Faliestinian people” invented by this “conflict”, now inevitably disappearing after the extinction of the “conflict” itself. The lies, once invented by the Orabs with Soviet KGB, and now being canceled by them, are crumbling.

        1. Second, there is incredible strategic potential in these agreements.

          Under the former dictator, Omar Hassan al-Bashir, Sudan was an ally of Iran and Hamas. It is no coincidence that it was through Sudan that the flow of arms went to Gaza. Now Sudan is becoming part of a completely different union, drawing closer to Israel, and this is a colossal change in the entire regional situation.

          1. Third, the Sudan has remained particularly hostile to Israel over the years. The transition to full-fledged diplomatic relations with Israel, including air communication between the countries, is revolutionary and shows how strong Israel has become in recent years, and therefore an important, literally, key player in the Middle East.

          2. Fourth, it infuriates the leaders of the fictional “Faliestinian people” even more. They, after all, have always insisted that until an agreement is concluded with them, no one from the Orab world will come close to Israel. Now this theory has collapsed. the Orab world – country after country comes to Israel, but they were on the sidelines, useless, forgotten and abandoned by everyone.

            They have lost all relevance and this drives them out of themselves and terribly scares them.

          3. Fifth, Sudan is located on the shores of the Red Sea, directly opposite Saudi Orabia and Yemen. In other words, in a strategic place for Israel. Earlier, Khartoum called on Turkey to create a Turkish military base on an island belonging to Sudan in the Red Sea. This plan has already failed, but now, rapprochement with Israel is becoming another heavy blow to the “Sultan” Erdogan.

          4. Sixth, only a few thousand “refugees” from the Sudan remain in Israel. The “human rights” organizations harming Israel used to lie to the courts, saying that if the “refugees” were returned to Sudan, they would be persecuted there, since they came from Israel. Now, nothing will prevent them from returning home, including the residents of the Darfur region. Since earlier in September, thanks to the mediation of the UAE, an agreement was already reached on Darfur. No more claims and false stories will be accepted and will not help.

Leave a Reply