US general in Afghanistan: Russia arming the Taliban

Share:

U.S. Army General John Nicholson (L), commander of U.S. Forces Afghanistan, and U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis (R) hold a news conference at Resolute Support headquarters in Kabul, Afghanistan April 24, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
U.S. Army General John Nicholson (L), commander of U.S. Forces Afghanistan, and U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis (R) hold a news conference at Resolute Support headquarters in Kabul, Afghanistan April 24, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
The United States must confront Russia for providing weapons to the Taliban for use against American-backed forces in Afghanistan, top U.S. military officials said Monday APRIL 24, 21017
The United States must confront Russia for providing weapons to the Taliban for use against American-backed forces in Afghanistan, top U.S. military officials said Monday APRIL 24, 21017

The United States must confront Russia for providing weapons to the Taliban for use against American-backed forces in Afghanistan, top U.S. military officials said Monday.

At a news conference with Defense Secretary Jim Mattis at his side, Gen. John Nicholson, the American commander in Afghanistan, wouldn’t provide specifics about Russia’s role in Afghanistan. But said he would “not refute” that Moscow’s involvement includes giving weapons to the Taliban.

Earlier Monday, a senior U.S. military official told reporters in Kabul that Russia was giving machine guns and other medium-weight weapons. The Taliban are using the weapons in the southern provinces of Helmand, Kandahar and Uruzgan, according to the official, who briefed journalists on intelligence information on condition of anonymity.

Russia denies that it provides any such support to the Taliban, which ruled Afghanistan until the U.S.-led invasion in 2001. Russia says contacts are limited to safeguarding security and getting the hard-line religious fundamentalists to reconcile with the government — which Washington has failed for years to advance. Russia also has promoted easing global sanctions on Taliban leaders who prove cooperative.

Asked about Russia’s activity in Afghanistan, where it fought a bloody war in the 1980s and withdrew in defeat, Mattis alluded to the increasing U.S. concerns.

“We’ll engage with Russia diplomatically,” Mattis said. “We’ll do so where we can, but we’re going to have to confront Russia where what they’re doing is contrary to international law or denying the sovereignty of other countries.”

“For example,” Mattis told reporters in the Afghan capital, “any weapons being funneled here from a foreign country would be a violation of international law.”

Mattis met with President Ashraf Ghani and other senior government officials just hours after the nation’s defense minister and Army chief resigned over a massacre of more than 140 Afghan troops at a military base last Friday.

The insurgent assault was the biggest ever on a military base in Afghanistan, involving multiple gunmen and suicide bombers in army uniforms who penetrated the compound of the 209th Corps of the Afghan National Army in northern Balkh province on Friday, killing and wounding scores. The death toll was likely to rise further.

Nicholson also said that in view of the sophisticated planning behind the attack, “it’s quite possible” that the Pakistan-based Haqqani network was responsible. The Taliban claimed it carried out the attack.

Nicholson, the top American commander in Kabul, recently told Congress that he needs a few thousand more troops to keep Afghan security forces on track to eventually handling the Taliban insurgency on their own.

Mattis on Monday offered a grim assessment for Afghan forces fighting the Taliban.

“2017 is going to be another tough year,” he said.

Kabul was the final stop on Mattis’ six-nation, weeklong tour. He is the first member of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet to visit Afghanistan. As part of the administration’s review of Afghan policy, Trump’s national security adviser, Army Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, visited Kabul last week to consult with Nicholson and with Afghan officials.

The war began in October 2001. The U.S. has about 9,800 troops in Afghanistan. They ended their combat mission against the Taliban in 2014 but are increasingly involved in backing up Afghan forces on the battlefield.

ABC NEWS

Share:

Comments

6 responses to “US general in Afghanistan: Russia arming the Taliban”

  1. I wonder what Putin is expected to gain from arming a terrorist group . This is Al Qaeda for God’s sake and Al Qaeda kicked the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan . Wake up Putin , this could end up being another Chechnya for Russia

    1. He’s sure his kleptocratic rule won’t be harmed. On the contrary: nothing like a little terrorism to boost the ratings.

    2. wargame1 Avatar

      Al-Qaeda didnt have any major role to play in Afghanistan. They were promoted heavily by the western media. The real fighters were the local Afghans who later was known as Taliban. After the US invasion in Afghanistan most of the Al-Qaeda leaders fled to Iran. The Afghans know their stray dogs better than Osama Bin Laden. It was CNN who introduced Osama. Al-Qaedas role in Afghanistan was just the same as ISIS in Syria. All the rebel group in Syria are against ISIS but the western media and the Assad regime portray ISIS as the main resistance so that Assad can claim that he is fighting the ISIS!!
      It was Iran and Russia who helped USA in overthrowing Taliban. But Taliban came back strong and the USA have realized that it is better to leave them alone. The puppet government in place but they dont have influence ove most of the Afghans. Now, Russia and Iran are arming the Taliban in order to drove the Americans from Afghanistan. It seems they are confident that once USA is gone then RUssia and Iran would take over Afghanistan. The Afghan puppet government is pro Iranian shia. The Taliban will take whatever they get from Russia and Iran and if they can drive the Americans out then they would be able to drive the Russian and Iranian out too.

  2. (off topic) Wild boars rampage in Kirkuk leaves 3 Islamic State members dead http://www.iraqinews.com/iraq-war/wild-boars-rampage-kirkuk-leaves-3-members-dead/

  3. The same so called “Mujahidin” that the US armed in the 80’s oh the irony!

    1. wargame1 Avatar

      Why the USA armed them? USA didnt lose any of their solders and made the Afghans do their fight. The Afghans didnt have choice but to fight the Russian invading pigs. If the Afghans would invade Russia with US help then you could have something to blame. The outcome of the war was great. The communist were defeated. Two Germany became one, East European countries could free themselves from these filthy commies. They were indeed Mujaheddin but the Al-Qaeda were Khawarij who went their to take over the power. When the Taliban took over the Al-Qaeda conspired against them and framed them with 911 attack. Most of the Al-Qaeda leaders then fled to Iran. We have the same scenario in Iran where ISIS khawarij came in 2013 with the intention to hijack the resistance. It was Assad and Iran who operate ISIS and Al-Qaeda. ISIS have failed in Iraq and Syria. All the Syrian rebel group expell these Khawarij and also they are fighting against these Khawarij.

Leave a Reply