Chinese couples to be allowed to have 2 children under new China policy

Share:

CHINA 2 CHILD POLICYChina will ease family planning restrictions to allow all couples to have two children after decades of the strict one-child policy, the ruling Communist Party said on Thursday, a move aimed at alleviating demographic strains on the economy.

The policy is a major liberalization of the country’s family planning restrictions, already eased in late 2013 when Beijing said it would allow more families to have two children when the parents met certain conditions.

A growing number of scholars had urged the government to reform the rules, introduced in the late 1970s to prevent population growth spiraling out of control, but now regarded as outdated and responsible for shrinking China’s labor pool.

For the first time in decades the working age population fell in 2012, and China, the world’s most populous nation, could be the first country in the world to get old before it gets rich.

The announcement was made at the close of a key Party meeting focused on financial reforms and maintaining growth between 2016 and 2020 amid concerns over the country’s slowing economy.

China will “fully implement a policy of allowing each couple to have two children as an active response to an aging population”, the party said in a statement carried by the official Xinhua news agency.

There were no immediate details on the new policy or a timeframe for implementation.

Wang Feng, a leading expert on demographic and social change in China, called the change an “historic event” that would change the world but said the challenges of China’s aging society would remain.

“It’s an event that we have been waiting for a generation, but it is one we have had to wait much too long for,” Wang said.

“It won’t have any impact on the issue of the aging society, but it will change the character of many young families,” Wang said.

TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE?

Under the 2013 reform, couples in which one parent is an only child were allowed to have a second child.

Critics said the relaxation of rules was too little, too late to redress substantial negative effects of the one-child policy on the economy and society.

Many couples who were allowed another child under the 2013 rules decided not to, especially in the cities, citing the cost of bringing up children in an increasingly expensive country.

State media said in January that about 30,000 families in Beijing, just 6.7 percent of those eligible, applied to have a second child. The Beijing government had said last year that it expected an extra 54,200 births annually as a result of the change in rules.

Chinese people took to microblogging site Weibo, China’s answer to Twitter, to welcome the move, but many said they probably wouldn’t opt for a second child.

“I can’t even afford to raise one, let alone two,” wrote one user.

Couples who flout family planning laws in China are, at minimum, fined, some lose their jobs, and in some cases mothers are forced to abort their babies or be sterilized.

William Nee, a China researcher at human rights campaign group Amnesty International, welcomed the move, but urged China to go further.

“China should immediately and completely end its control over people’s decisions to have children. This would not only be good for improving human rights, but would also make sense given the stark demographic challenges that lie ahead,” he said.

REUTERS

Share:

Comments

22 responses to “Chinese couples to be allowed to have 2 children under new China policy”

  1. 让我们来学习中国

    1. Nee ho Ma!

      To all you retards that post links, or anything else, in a language other than English, Arabic or French, Fuck off to those sites that speak the languages that aren’t spoken here.

      And the reason I said those three languages is coz that’s what most Lebanese speak. AND this is a site about Lebanon or what affects Lebanon.

      Dumbium should fuck off to bild and take its walking stick.
      Vs should fuck off back to Israel or Russia.
      And I should fuck off to Mars.

      1. you’re an idiot ass pimple

        1. Quick squeeze me 🙂

          1. 5thDrawer Avatar

            eeewwwwwwww…..

  2. IS closed antenatal clinics with male gynecologists in Raqqa

    1. Maybe Coz they are worried scum like you might be born.
      I honestly gave you the benefit of the doubt originally. But you are nothing but a extremist settler. It is honestly scum like you that fuck this world up. And IT IS a Beautiful world but ruined by terrorists, bigots, racists, homophobes etc.
      (Where the fuck are those flight to Mars!!??)

      One other thing, when I use the word terrorist, it includes governments (ie: like your Israeli apartheid racist bigoted terrorist government and all those that support its vile actions.) Israel is no better than Assad.

      1. fuck off idiot

  3. Nigeria mother arrested over ‘$90 baby sale’ http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-34680569

    1. In 2013, the Nigerian police discovered in a house in the south-east of the country 17 girls become pregnant by one man. It also found 11 babies. According to investigators, the owner of the shelter forced the girls to pregnancy. After birth, children taken away to be sold. The house was named “Factory for the production of children.”
      According to the UN, human trafficking, including the sale of babies, is the third most common crime in Nigeria after the fraud and drug trafficking

    2. Michaelinlondon1234 Avatar
      Michaelinlondon1234

      Guess what…Over 7 billion people and every one is different…..Get use to it.

  4. 5thDrawer Avatar

    The battles of concepts ….
    “could be the first country in the world to get old before it gets rich.”
    Not that getting old meant becoming more rich, and in fact usually means the opposite.
    ‘Golden Age’ is an advertising slogan … largely promoted by those who think there should always be more people to ‘take care of’ the future … which factor is simply ruining the planet ‘the aged’ enjoyed – once upon a time.
    Well, it seems only ‘religion’ can warp the thinking that people should not make their own choices.
    And China doesn’t have any one ‘officially’.

    It DOES have 300 million internal refugees, however, looking for work. And that was with a ‘one baby’ policy.
    AND STILL, we see the line: “…and responsible for shrinking China’s labor pool.”
    So, WHAT are you calling ‘labour’ these days? Pushing papers in a bank or a government office?
    Probably …
    “I can’t even afford to raise one, let alone two,” … one honest person looking at what he gets for his ‘labour’ VS what the ‘necessary’ cell-phone or computer cost, so he can add and subtract at a grocery store counter.
    His ‘reality choice’ SHOULD be not to have any at all. Because ‘the future’ isn’t looking better.

    1. Michaelinlondon1234 Avatar
      Michaelinlondon1234

      I was in china in 89. they needed the one child policy. It is the only reason China is still habitable. I am not saying the methods do not need refining.
      In the UK we have woman being paid to be baby farms which I completely disagree with.
      Chinese population….over 1.4 billion
      Lebanese population….total less than 5 million. less than most major Chinese cities. And China have universal education for the whole of the population.
      The bigger the control group when mistakes are made it affects millions verses hundreds or thousands.
      I do not see any other country system that services its population better. It is a socialist communist republic. India which is closest is chaotic. does not do universal education.
      So when is Lebanon going to have universal education and sort out the rubbish problem? You certainly have enough people to do both jobs.

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Geezzz Michael .. don’t lump me in with the tiny crowd. I’d like to see them educated too.
        Let’s at least admit there a difference in ‘land mass’ to begin with – although on a percentage basis (charts & graphs) maybe not much more arable land.
        And yes .. putting ‘socialist’ beside ‘communist’ is a failure of concept. Although we can admit that Cuba, China, and Europe DO the ‘socialist health care’ a whole lot better than Lebanon.
        What I was talking about was ‘general policy of humans’ to procreate before thinking.
        And yes, you think all the orphans should be adopted, instead of having a surrogate mother carry one for a childless couple. That’s you.

        1. Michaelinlondon1234 Avatar
          Michaelinlondon1234

          Lebanon has more arable land. It does not have the same level of industrial pollutants yet. It has spent decades exporting population.
          It has cried wolf far to often.
          Regarding orphans…Not my children. Not interested. To many scams around that subject.

    1. Michaelinlondon1234 Avatar
      Michaelinlondon1234

      It is something to do with the drugs they do in 5 star hotels and spending lots of time in Newyork and Washington that fries the brain cells of international bureaucrats.
      WHO sat on its hands for 8 months watching the Ebola epidemic unfold….
      World bank? Did not predict the last financial crash.
      Has caused food conflicts in the past…Some really stupid advice as well.
      I have been to Singapore….They groom their international image very carefully.

  5. 2.11 Because of heavy rainfall in several major Iraqi cities river overflowed and the water mixed with the contents of the crowded stormwater and sewage. Reported hundreds of deads

  6. November 16, 2015. Dresden held a mass protest against the influx of refugees

    1. with their families

Leave a Reply