Kerry calls for end to Syria ‘imbalance’

Share:

kerry qatarUS Secretary of State John Kerry says supporters of the Syrian opposition will step up military and other aid in a bid to end an “imbalance” on the ground in President Bashar al-Assad’s favour.

Kerry, speaking at a conference of foreign ministers in Qatar on Saturday, said that the United States remained committed to a peace plan that includes a conference in Geneva and a transitional government picked both by Assad and the opposition.

The rebels need more support “for the purpose of being able to get to Geneva and to be able to address the imbalance on the ground,” Kerry said.

“The United States and other countries here – in their various ways, each choosing its own approach – will increase the scope and scale of assistance to the political and military opposition,” Kerry said.

Kerry said that the governments at the conference – which include stalwart supporters of the rebels Qatar and Saudi Arabia – would work to “coordinate our support” to the opposition’s Supreme Military Council.

Kerry accused Assad of an “internationalisation” of the conflict which has claimed nearly 100,000 lives by bringing in the support of Iran and the Lebanese Shi’ite movement Hezbollah.

“Reliable civilian governance and a stronger and more effective armed opposition will better enable the opposition to be able to provide the counterweight to the initiative of Assad,” he said.

President Barack Obama has announced plans to step up assistance to the rebels after concluding that Assad crossed his stated red line by using chemical weapons.

But the United States has said little about its own assistance, with Obama voicing concern about becoming too involved in the increasingly sectarian conflict.

News.com.au

Share:

Comments

2 responses to “Kerry calls for end to Syria ‘imbalance’”

  1. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    But Kerry Dear … I’m sure you remember Vietnam … the French do, as they had to go the bayonet at Dien Bien Fu. Eventually the 90% overwhelmed them … and you too I believe. The ‘superior weapons’ just couldn’t get past the volume of bodies any more. Stalin treated Hitler the same way … a few guns in front, picked up from dead fighters by the waves of peasants following behind. Gun has a big clip … everyone gets off one shot … it worked. 😉 Equality can be had in many ways. :-)))
    It Seems, in all the ‘dialogues’, that basically everyone worries about ‘how many’ THEIR ‘side’ loses.
    But WHY ??? If they didn’t want loses, there wouldn’t be a war in the first place … right? 😉

    Not that I was in it, but I remember hearing a favorite WWI song … (ugly war that entrenched one) …
    ‘Praise The Lord, And Pass The Ammuniton’.

    Of course, everyone worries that on the ‘radical sides’ there could be a ‘Pol Pot’ coming out of it.
    But, he couldn’t put enough into the fields either …
    And what you MUST do, is get ALL the minds OUT of the feeling that ‘production is everything’.

  2. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    But Kerry Dear … I’m sure you remember Vietnam … the French do, as they had to go the bayonet at Dien Bien Fu. Eventually the 90% overwhelmed them … and you too I believe. The ‘superior weapons’ just couldn’t get past the volume of bodies any more. Stalin treated Hitler the same way … a few guns in front, picked up from dead fighters by the waves of peasants following behind. Gun has a big clip … everyone gets off one shot … it worked. 😉 Equality can be had in many ways. :-)))
    It Seems, in all the ‘dialogues’, that basically everyone worries about ‘how many’ THEIR ‘side’ loses.
    But WHY ??? If they didn’t want loses, there wouldn’t be a war in the first place … right? 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *