42nd Earth Day: What Are We Celebrating?

Share:

by Ghassan Karam

Many in the world are already celebrating the 42nd anniversary of Earth Day and that is understandable. The young idealists who started this movement had a dream, a dream that the citizens of this planet have grown up, opened their eyes and decided that the human species must change its behavior , in all fields, if the planet and all what is on it is to have a chance to sustain its existence and to thrive. Over forty years have passed and the dream is farther=r away than ever. Actually it is not an exaggeration to claim that the dream is currently out of reach and that the human species has managed to create the conditions that will lead to nothing short of a ruinous outcome. Yes we are beyond the tipping point and in the words of the great James Lovelock we are witnessing “Gaia’s Revenge”.

How naive of us to have expected a different path. The idealism of youth blinded us from noting that every noble goal calls for commitment, hard work and sacrifice. A worthwhile goal is not for free but demands that we make major changes in our attitude and our behavior. It is not enough to put lipstick on a pig.

Modernity has allowed us to build islands of prosperity but within oceans of need and degradation. Yet what we wanted to do was to continue business as usual hoping that if we keep doing the same thing over and over again then eventually the outcome will be different. It never is. Exploitation breeds exploitation, tyranny cannot give birth to freedom and a world that is built on the principle that holds nationalism and patriotism as sacred is doomed to sacrifice the other and abuse the commons. Greed and selfishness is not the road to salvation. they are the road to perdition.

Whether the age of the Anthropogenic started with the industrial revolution or even 12000 years earlier as some would argue, the simple fact of the matter is that the direct effect of human behavior have grown so fast over the past 50-60 years that unless we show enough spine and courage to undertake meaningful action to change rather radically our behavior then the Anthropogenic might be bringing about its own destruction and in short order.

Climate deniers aside, scientific models suggest that the limits of human adaptation to climate change are in the 6-8 degrees Fahrenheit range. What is very disturbing about the above is the fact that most models predict that we will be there by around 2100; the 4degrees Fahrenheit is already in the bag and cannot be avoided even if all emissions are to stop tomorrow.

As if all of that is not enough, we go on our merry way pretending that the overall number of humans on this planet is not an issue of concern neither is the food that is required to nourish them. A quick calculation based on the carbon footprint of the average US citizen implies that we need about 6 planets if the same standard of living is to be made available to all the Earths’ inhabitants. Why shouldn’t it? It is tragic that many believe that financial capital can substitute for natural capital and so many nations increase their rate of accumulation of financial assets by devouring the only capital that counts, the natural ones. Is that anything short of a Sorceress’ Apprentice as John Foster Ballamy, a Marxist economist has stated?

It is rather clear that “only mad men and economists believe that we can have indefinite growth in a finite base” and that unless we “dare to do the impossible then we will have to contemplate the improbable”. Capitalism has ushered in the most prosperous period in history and has encouraged a modicum of democracy, liberty and creativity. Alas Capitalism rests on the premise that there are no limits to growth and thus, if left unfettered will only compound the ecological and human crisis. It is time that we accept the simple conclusion that a paradigm shift is sorely needed, a radical revolutionary change that questions the misguided principles upon which we have built our world vision , a vision that is out of step with reality. Yes, creative destruction will bring about the end of the system that nourished it and that is the way that it should be. That is how history unfolds. Ecological sanity is not compatible with any of the present societal structures that we have erected anywhere in this world.

Celebrate Earth Day with an open mind and with a sincere commitment that a healthy environment is not to be had through policies of economic growth, larger human populations and an archaic societal architecture that is built to favour personal good instead of that of the commonwealth.

Share:

Comments

20 responses to “42nd Earth Day: What Are We Celebrating?”

  1. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    True enough Ghassan … but people will always blame it on the great ‘them’ … or even on a God. They even accept now the ‘will of God’ … and educate less about the planet, environment, loss of species, etc. because of that.
    Continuing to plow farmland under to build huge cities on it doesn’t help of course. And they cut the rainforests anywhere to make more farms. The problem is that humans always think they are in control, and need to be ‘making it better’ than natural. Well, if so, it’s time to control the volume of the species. Only education will raise individual awareness on that of course. But you are right … if we haven’t done it by now, it won’t happen … unless it’s by massive ‘adjustments’ caused by the planet itself.
    Hmmmm … you don’t think Assad is a closet environmentalist, do you? 😉

    1. Ghassan Karam Avatar
      Ghassan Karam

      5thDrawer,
                    I am sure that Bashar thinks of himself as an environmentalist but there is a theory , among deep ecologists, that believes in ecological egalitarianism. As you can see no dictatorships in the natural world:-) Bashar  losses again lol.

  2. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    True enough Ghassan … but people will always blame it on the great ‘them’ … or even on a God. They even accept now the ‘will of God’ … and educate less about the planet, environment, loss of species, etc. because of that.
    Continuing to plow farmland under to build huge cities on it doesn’t help of course. And they cut the rainforests anywhere to make more farms. The problem is that humans always think they are in control, and need to be ‘making it better’ than natural. Well, if so, it’s time to control the volume of the species. Only education will raise individual awareness on that of course. But you are right … if we haven’t done it by now, it won’t happen … unless it’s by massive ‘adjustments’ caused by the planet itself.
    Hmmmm … you don’t think Assad is a closet environmentalist, do you? 😉

    1. 5thDrawer,
                    I am sure that Bashar thinks of himself as an environmentalist but there is a theory , among deep ecologists, that believes in ecological egalitarianism. As you can see no dictatorships in the natural world:-) Bashar  losses again lol.

  3. Sebouh80 Avatar
    Sebouh80

    An Excellent article that I tip my hat.

    Basically, the essence of this article is loud and clear that says we cannot afford to continue in the same path of “Business as Usual” and ignore the ecological and human crisis that is the outcome of perpetual growth which is inherent under capitalism.
    The bottom line is that we need a paradigm shift and if we fail to act in due course then I’m afraid ultimately nature will take its revenge and that would be catastrophic.
    Mr.Karam, do you think this bald initiative will come from politicians or from a separate political movement that would challenge the existing spheres of influence.
    One more thing, almost two years ago I received a well informative site from you about the present conditions of our planet based on how much we consume from the existing available resources. At that time I believe it was 1.4 times. Kindly can you share with us the site name if you still have it.
    Take care.

    1. Ghassan Karam Avatar
      Ghassan Karam

       Sebouh,
                   The pain that civilization will have to go through as a result of the damage that we are wreaking on nature could have been avoided had we been Homo Sapiens (Smart beings:-)) but I guess that we are not.
                   I worry about all the pain but then I am glad that it will force us to change and adopt a new paradigm.
      How will the change come about? Obviously no one can tell but my feeling is that it cannot come from the top. The political class is either selfish or is tyrannical and in both cases that does not qualify them to lead major changes.

  4. Sebouh80 Avatar
    Sebouh80

    An Excellent article that I tip my hat.

    Basically, the essence of this article is loud and clear that says we cannot afford to continue in the same path of “Business as Usual” and ignore the ecological and human crisis that is the outcome of perpetual growth which is inherent under capitalism.
    The bottom line is that we need a paradigm shift and if we fail to act in due course then I’m afraid ultimately nature will take its revenge and that would be catastrophic.
    Mr.Karam, do you think this bald initiative will come from politicians or from a separate political movement that would challenge the existing spheres of influence.
    One more thing, almost two years ago I received a well informative site from you about the present conditions of our planet based on how much we consume from the existing available resources. At that time I believe it was 1.4 times. Kindly can you share with us the site name if you still have it.
    Take care.

    1.  Sebouh,
                   The pain that civilization will have to go through as a result of the damage that we are wreaking on nature could have been avoided had we been Homo Sapiens (Smart beings:-)) but I guess that we are not.
                   I worry about all the pain but then I am glad that it will force us to change and adopt a new paradigm.
      How will the change come about? Obviously no one can tell but my feeling is that it cannot come from the top. The political class is either selfish or is tyrannical and in both cases that does not qualify them to lead major changes.

  5. Prophettttt Avatar
    Prophettttt

    Ghassan, I gather from your article that  capitalism , democracy,and freedom as a combination is responsible for the life style which led to the conditions you describe as “Ecological sanity”.We all know that capitalism has no conscious,and because of that, many democracies  who embraced capitalism , eventually  introduced many social and economical programs to balance out the greed of capitalism.We also know that in democratic countries where freedom and free elections have given capitalism more power,and as a result,more damage to the environment. have taken place than in poor and underdeveloped countries.
    Can we say that capitalism,as an economical and social system needs to be examined,and freedom has to be contained since the human mind is wired in a way that works based on greed and self satisfaction?
    I’m not suggesting  that communism is the alternative because communism,although it contains human greed,among other things,it limits human freedom,  equates people in unfair ways,and limits the admissions of individuals.

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      Again I say Prophet, that the main mistake God made was not putting past memory into the genetic code. We must teach each generation from the beginning again … from first thoughts at the mother’s knee. (Very inefficient plan there, God.) The tree of knowledge didn’t reproduce either it seems … unless you count those special books only a few actually read as ‘all’ knowledge – which obviously doesn’t seem to be the case.
      Getting the right thinking into individual heads is essential to this problem … through word AND practice.
      There’s enough knowledge out there now, and many people crying in the wilderness. Some, of course, would become the despotic in their methods. But in the end it’s up to the individual.
      Some schools are trying … at young ages … to make it part of the thinking. If you can make us all feel guilty about smoking, then why not about throwing poison in a sewer system and straight through to an ocean? Or having more than 2.3 babies?

    2. Ghassan Karam Avatar
      Ghassan Karam

       Prophettt,
                     I think that you might have misread what the above essay is saying. It is saying exactly the opposite of what you have posted. i have tried to state that “Ecological sanity is NOT compatible with any of the syatems and Capitalism IS the problem. The world NEEDS a paradigm shift.”

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar
        5thDrawer

        Ah well Ghassan … Mt. Aetna is burping again … one day the planet will adjust the population load.

  6. Prophettttt Avatar
    Prophettttt

    Ghassan, I gather from your article that  capitalism , democracy,and freedom as a combination is responsible for the life style which led to the conditions you describe as 
     Ecological sanity.We all know that capitalism has no conscious,and because of that, many democracies  who embraced capitalism , eventually  introduced many social and economical programs to balance out the greed of capitalism.We also know that in democratic countries where freedom and free elections have given capitalism more power,and as a result,more damage to the environment. have taken place than in poor and underdeveloped countries.
    Can we say that capitalism,as an economical and social system needs to be examined,and freedom has to be contained since the human mind is wired in a way that works based on greed and self satisfaction?
    I’m not suggesting  that communism is the alternative because communism,although contains human greed, equates people in unfair ways,and limits the admissions of individuals. 

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar
      5thDrawer

      Again I say Prophet, that the main mistake God made was not putting past memory into the genetic code. We must teach each generation from the beginning again … from first thoughts at the mother’s knee. (Very inefficient plan there, God.) The tree of knowledge didn’t reproduce either it seems … unless you count those special books only a few actually read as ‘all’ knowledge – which obviously doesn’t seem to be the case.
      Getting the right thinking into individual heads is essential to this problem … through word AND practice.
      There’s enough knowledge out there now, and many people crying in the wilderness. Some, of course, would become the despotic in their methods. But in the end it’s up to the individual.
      Some schools are trying … at young ages … to make it part of the thinking. If you can make us all feel guilty about smoking, then why not about throwing poison in a sewer system and straight through to an ocean? Or having more than 2.3 babies?

    2.  Prophettt,
                     I think that you might have misread what the above essay is saying. It is saying exactly the opposite of what you have posted. i have tried to state that “Ecological sanity is NOT compatible with any of the syatems and Capitalism IS the problem. The world NEEDS a paradigm shift.”

      1. 5thDrawer Avatar
        5thDrawer

        Ah well Ghassan … Mt. Aetna is burping again … one day the planet will adjust the population load.

  7. There is clear a contradiction between our way of living and the way we would like our future life to be. Unfortunately there is a need to produce and the alternative to the classical means of production are generally inefficient. Consuming less would certainly help but that would not be enough: We need to inovate our production technology and this is expensive. Increasing corporate taxes for the more polluant producers and decreasing it for the cleaner producers is an intelligent way of financing that research, the same way Europe does with the CO2 certificates. More initiatives like that would certainly help. Sell it to the Americans and the Chinese!

  8. There is clear a contradiction between our way of living and the way we would like our future life to be. Unfortunately there is a need to produce and the alternative to the classical means of production are generally inefficient. Consuming less would certainly help but that would not be enough: We need to inovate our production technology and this is expensive. Increasing corporate taxes for the more polluant producers and decreasing it for the cleaner producers is an intelligent way of financing that research, the same way Europe does with the CO2 certificates. More initiatives like that would certainly help. Sell it to the Americans and the Chinese!

  9. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    BBC-Programmes. Speaking of numbers, like 42 ….
    “After being invented by Indian mathematicians, modern numbers became established in the ancient Arab world, and then journeyed on to Europe in what was essentially the first maths textbook ever written, Liber Abaci.”
     Its author was Leonardo of Pisa, better known as Fibonacci

  10. 5thDrawer Avatar
    5thDrawer

    BBC-Programmes. Speaking of numbers, like 42 ….
    “After being invented by Indian mathematicians, modern numbers became established in the ancient Arab world, and then journeyed on to Europe in what was essentially the first maths textbook ever written, Liber Abaci.”
     Its author was Leonardo of Pisa, better known as Fibonacci

Leave a Reply