Jordanian jets pound ISIS as king comforts slain pilot’s family

Share:
Jordan's King Abdullah (C) embraces Fahed al-Kasaesbeh, the uncle of Jordanian pilot Muath al-Kasaesbeh, as he arrives to offer his condolences at the headquarters of the family's clan in the city of Karak February 5, 2015. CREDIT: REUTERS/PETRA NEWS AGENCY
Jordan’s King Abdullah (C) embraces Fahed al-Kasaesbeh, the uncle of Jordanian pilot Muath al-Kasaesbeh, as he arrives to offer his condolences at the headquarters of the family’s clan in the city of Karak February 5, 2015.
CREDIT: REUTERS/PETRA NEWS AGENCY

Jordanian fighter jets pounded Islamic State hideouts in Syria on Thursday and then roared over the hometown of a pilot killed by the militants, while below them King Abdullah consoled the victim’s family.

Witnesses overheard the monarch telling the pilot’s father the planes were returning from the militant-held city of Raqqa. A security source told Reuters the strikes hit targets in the eastern province of Deir al-Zor and near Raqqa.

The show of force came two days after the ultra-hardline Islamic State released a video showing captured Jordanian pilot Mouath al-Kasaesbeh being burned alive in a cage as masked militants in camouflage uniforms stood around watching.

State television said details of the attacks would be made known later. If so, this would be the first time Jordan has announced carrying out strikes outside the framework of the U.S.-led military coalition ranged against Islamic State.

A U.S. official, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, said that the strikes took place in the vicinity of Raqqa, where the Jordanian pilot was executed.

Military commanders briefed King Abdullah after the missions about the details of the strikes, state television said.

return of the dark ages ISIS burns pilot aliveThe monarch has vowed to avenge Kasaesbeh’s killing and ordered commanders to prepare for a stepped-up military role in the U.S.-led coalition against the group. But many Jordanians fear being dragged into a conflict that could trigger a backlash by hardline militants inside the kingdom.

Jordan is a major U.S. ally in the fight against hardline Islamist groups, and hosted U.S. troops during operations that led to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. It is home to hundreds of U.S. military trainers bolstering defences at the Syrian and Iraqi borders, and is determined to keep the jihadists in Syria away from its frontiers.

“NO HUMANITY”

State television showed a sombre king sitting alongside the army chief and senior officials visiting the Kasaesbeh tribal family in Aya, a village some 100 km (60 miles) south of the capital Amman.

The king, wearing a traditional Arab head dress, was met with cheering crowds and cries of “Long Live his Majesty the King, Long Live the King” in traditional Bedouin chanting.

Thousands of Jordanians flocked to pay their respects in a part of the country where influential tribes form an important pillar of support for the Hashemite monarchy and supply the army and security forces with their manpower.

“You are a wise monarch. These criminals violated the rules of war in Islam and they have no humanity. Even humanity disowns them,” Safi Kasaesbeh, father of the pilot, told the king.

The Jordanian monarch has vowed that the death of the pilot, which has stirred nationalist fervour across the country, will bring severe retaliation against Islamic State.

Hours after the release of the video showing the pilot burning to death, the authorities executed two al Qaeda militants who had been on death row, including a woman who had tried to blow herself up in a suicide bombing and whose release had been demanded by Islamic State.

Reuters

Share:

Comments

112 responses to “Jordanian jets pound ISIS as king comforts slain pilot’s family”

  1. Reasonableman Avatar
    Reasonableman

    تسريبات من الأردن: الطيارة الإماراتية مريم المنصوري مسؤولة عن سقوط الطائرة الأردنية

    شهاب – مصادر

    ذكرت آخر التسريبات العسكرية من العاصمة الأردنية ان الطائرة الاردنية التي أسقطت في سوريا كانت تحلق ضمن سرب تشرف على عملياته من ارتفاعات شاهقة طائرة اماراتية تقودها مريم المنصوري.

    وقالت التسريبات أن مريم هي التي امرت الطيار الاردني بالانخفاض الشديد والطيران على ارتفاع منخفض جدا لضرب موقع يعتقد بوجود زعيم داعش فيه مع علم الطيارة الاماراتية بخطورة المحاولة لوجود جبل قريب تتحصن به وحدات شيشانية مزودة بصواريخ متطورة مضادة للطائرات من نوع استينجر وهو ما جعل طائرة الكساسبة في مرمى النيران .

    ووفقا للمصدر فان الطيارة الاماراتية مريم المنصوري التي شهدت عملية اسقاط الطائرة الاردنية لم تقم بإعطاء احداثيات السقوط لفرقة مظليين قريبة مشكلة من امريكيين واردنيين وعملها هو انقاذ اي طيار يقفز بالمظلة في ساحة المعركة .

    ولم تتمكن الفرقة من الوصول الى الطيار الاردني لتأخر ابلاغها بمكان سقوطه مما سهل لداعش عملية القبض عليه رغم ان انقاذه كان متاحا لان الطيار نجح وبمهارة في تغيير مسار المظلة التي قفز بها بعيدا عن الهدف ليهبط في مياه النهر.

    ووفقا للمصدر فان الطيار الكساسبة ظل في النهر لأكثر من ساعة قبل القاء القبض عليه.

    Source: chehab news

    1. Reasonableman Avatar
      Reasonableman

      In summary for non arabic readers, the finger is being pointed at the commander of the operation “mariam almansouri” for knowing well of a cave full of chechnian isis fighters equipped with surface to air missiles was up ahead and still ordered the jet to fly at dangerously low altitudes.

      On a side night jordanian king abdullah (ex airforce commando) threatened to fly over and bomb isis himself.

      1. Reasonableman Avatar
        Reasonableman

        Almost star treck like #lol #sigh

      2. 5thDrawer Avatar

        Seems reasonable … and is only the first ‘hit’.

      3. wargame1 Avatar

        Daeshbags get their anti aircraft missile from Iran and this will be exposed sooner or later.

        1. nonsense.Syiah killed them badly at the time of America occupation..100 daily…in ten years..a bout 800,000 sunni iraqis killed by Syiah.How can they got their weapon from Syiits ?

    2. American politicians armies and Jews now advocated Zionism,they are not Christian any more.They planted new world order in Middle east,controlling oil and politic there..so if Arabs are fighting for america and sided with coalition,they eventually fighting for Zionism..and destroy Arabs glory..The west are cheating Arabs badly at the past..but these Arabs can,t learn anything from history books.Many Arabs trapped in America games to destroy them and separated them badly.America also planted wars among Sunni and Syiah to destroy both on behalf of Israel.America will do anything to plant full scale wars in Middle East..It is Zionism plan made in white house before 9 11.0oooo Arabs ..open you eyes..and wake up.Don,t let America disperse you badly.Fear god ..don,fear America.America is not immortal.It is only God who are immortal.Muslims who kill muslim….both are in hell fire.

      1. nagy_michael2 Avatar
        nagy_michael2

        listen you idiot and to all muslims who think that everyone in the west is christians. you will be surprised they are a lot who are not christians or follow christianity. just because they were born in the west that doesn’t make them christians. i saw one movie long time ago in lebanon where some westerners making love in Church. the muslims were all mocking christians little they know because they were white and westerners that don’t make them christians. real christians do not kill, or make love in church or steal. but zabada al Zib here want to make americans and jews all bad. did he forget that if it was not for Clinton who i disliked anyway saved the muslims of eastern europe from croatia and serbia? not even a single muslim country rose to help them. it was america who started the fight against the serbs. it was the west who prosecuted the war criminals of serbia. or did you forget that you little fuck.

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar

          Many things are conveniently forgotten. Sometimes even by the ones who’s asses were saved. And the propaganda against ‘proper logical thinking’ about the simplest things is VERY heavy. We see it … and more and more often I’d say in the past ten years.
          Basically, nothing is considered in a ‘simple’ way.
          (my past thoughts about ‘simple’ concepts not being repeated this time)
          The list of obviscations grows longer and confuses more brains. (even some who have one)

        2. Because most western are not stick on their religion , that why they are bombing others only for democracy and Arab,s oil..why i must hear to an ignorant and arrogant infidel,who are will live in hell for ever..like you ?.

          1. wargame1 Avatar

            Here is a video of a grave worshiper Hisham Kabbani going towards a grave and then climb on top of it and prostrating and talking to that dead guy. No wonder why the grave worshipers hate Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmHTRD2G6R0

          2. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Yah. Awesome. (and didn’t capture any ‘ghostly’ images either … tsk)

          3. muhammad Abdul wahab…see horn of satan from Najad.It is only muhammad abdul who are fake ulema who turn to Syeikhul Islam..None of any ulema who are from Najad and who are turned to syekhul Islam.It is only him.the authentic hadith fit to him,and really refer to him.peace ..brother.

          4. Like others some sufis are true some are deluding a way.But all wahabis and Syiah are wrong.

          5. wargame1 Avatar

            You have simply attested that you are a shit eating sufi

          6. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Wow, Zabada …. if you think Nagy is going to Hell, and he seems to believe in a lot of that Godly stuff like you do, then I MUST be already IN IT. !!!!
            Is THAT why there’s so much snow out there ???? :-0 (mmmmm – scary)

          7. nagy_michael2 Avatar
            nagy_michael2

            the westerner even without the good christians still make much more descent human beings than you low life ISIS Scums and mullahs of Iran. all you people talk about wars and killing and you killed each other for thousands of years and you keep blaming everybody except yourselves. oh what the use talking to non-sense war monger like you.

        3. wargame1 Avatar

          This Zabada secretly support Iran but he cant do it openly at this time so he go around to denounce others who can be a threat to Iran. He recommended to listen to a sufi crack pot named Imran Hossain who openly support Iran and Assad plus Russia. Now Zabada has a problem to continue that in this forum so he took the back door strategy. He clearly find the Daesh dogs as a good weapon against the sunnis.

          1. Imran Hossein do that to unite Syiah and Sunni..but he eventually can,t do that.It is impossible to eradicat Syiits before Almahdi appearance.Only almahdi is able to unite the two.Almahdi also will drive most half of christian to Sunni.The rest of christians will be burnt in hell fire forever.So the rset of syiah..since not all oif them will convert to sunni even at the time of almahdi in near future.I much better than Nostradamus.

          2. wargame1 Avatar

            Prophet Mohammad (Peace be upon him) said: “For (in) every Ummah (nation), there are Magians (Zoroastrians). The Magians of this Ummah (Muslim nation) are those who reject the Qadr (pre-destination). If anyone amongst them dies, do not attend their funeral, and if anyone amongst them becomes sick, don’t visit them. They are Shia of the Dajjal and it is the right of God to join them with the Dajjal.” (Sunan Abu Dawud #4072)
            The Shia reject the concept of Qadar (pre-destination) and instead have adopted the Mutazalite school of thought which rejects Qadr (pre-destination). The descendants of the Magians are none other than the Persians who mix Magianism (Zoroastrian religion) with Islam?

            Now Imran Hossain is the agent of the Shias who doesnt follow the sunnah of the prophet

          3. Imran husisn is not an agent to syiah.He fond to them and hoping they will unite with sunnis,hence Sunnis and Syiits will not killed each others..of course he failed to do so.

          4. wargame1 Avatar

            Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) said “The Dajjal (Anti-Christ) will be followed by 70,000 Jews of Isfahan (city in Iran), having on themselves Tayalisa (type of hoods or turbans).” (Sahih Muslim #5227)
            The shia religion was invented by Abdullah Ibn Al Sabah and their 12 Imam is in fact Dajjal. Today, 90% of the Persians (Iranians) are Shia. Furthermore, there are only few Jews in Iran today. So, it is reasonable to conclude that the “70,000 Jews of Isfahan” will most likely be Shia. Shouldn’t the Ahlus Sunnah (Sunnis) be prepared to deal with this potential secret alliance between the Jews and the Persian Shia? So who wants unity with the Shia other than a Shia with Taqyaa like you?

          5. wargame1 Avatar

            “rophet Mohammad (Peace be upon him) said ” Allah will grant the Muslims victory over Dajjal and the Muslims will kill him and his Shia; when the Shia of Dajjal hide behind a tree or a stone, then the tree and the stone will say to the Muslim that there is a Jew behind me come and kill him.” (Musnad Imam Ahmad #5099)
            The word Shia is Arabic means group or followers. Is it simply a coincidence that this Hadith uses the Arabic word “Shia” to describe the followers of Dajjal? All these Hezbushaitan and the Iranian regime are Jew with Taqyaa and they are waiting for their messiah the Dajjal. Go and unite with them if you want.

          6. Iran, Zionists, and It’s Allies Diabolical Games

            Are they Enemies or Natural Allies – Fact or Myth?

            For the last thirty five odd years, the Islamic Republic of Iran has not only been constantly calling for the destruction of Israel, but has also been acting to make it happen. There is a little-known story that in 1873 Naser al-din Shah Qajar, king of Iran at the time, met with a few European Jewish figures. In his memoir, Naser said he made the following suggestion to them: as they were affluent enough, they should buy a land, make it home to the Jewish people and they themselves should become leaders of that land.

            The first encounter of an Iranian government with the Arab-Israeli conflict goes back to 1930. Mohammad Ali Foroughi, Iran’s foreign minister at the time, proposed to his leadership that Iran should be generally neutral in this conflict but have a slight tendency towards the Arabs. When Foroughi later became Prime Minister himself, he supported the Palestinians in his speech at the League of Nations.

            But Foroughi’s position on this issue had strong opponents. In 1936, the foreign minister, Enaytollah Samiee, proposed another policy that embraced a strategic alliance between the Jewish state and Iran. In his letter he advocated strong Iranian support for a Jewish state as Iran and the Jewish people had a common opponent, the Arabs of the region. He cites his concern that in the future an Arab empire could arise on Iran’s southern and western borders and threaten Iran’s national interest and so he looked at the Jewish state as a strong strategic ally.

            In 1950 Iran started its relations with Israel, amounting to de facto recognition, though it is worth noting that Iran had voted against accepting Israel at the United Nations. In July of 1951,

            Mohammad Mosaddegh, an ally of Islamists who had taken power due to the murder of Ali Razmara, his powerful rival, by Fadayan-e Islam, a radical Islamic fundamentalist group influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood, shut down the Iranian consulate in Jerusalem and cut off diplomatic relations. After the fall of Mosaddegh, the Shah was not yet powerful enough to stand against the rising Islamists and couldn’t restart diplomatic relations with Israel. Later, on July 24, 1960, the Shah declared a new chapter of relations between Iran and Israel. Two days later, Syria and Egypt, which had joined to become the United Arab Republic, cut off ties with Iran as a result of the Shah’s new policy. This ushered in 20 years of fruitful cooperation between Iran and Israel. Before the revolution, the two countries had worked with each other in several areas including oil, military and intelligence, agriculture, construction and other fields that were beneficial for both nations.

            It seems these days that such fruitful relations in partnership between Iran and Israel are far from ever happening again, but it only seems so on first sight. One must only remember demonstrators in the streets of Iran after the stolen elections of 2009 chanting ”Not Gaza, not Lebanon – my life for Iran.“ This was a sharp departure from the Islamic Republic’s hateful propaganda against Israel. In just one powerful sentence, Iranians revealed their true views on how much they detest the regime’s militant support for other Islamists in the region and its constant threats towards Israel. And by that they proved their true democratic vision.

            Now that this vision is no mere passing fancy, but could become reality, how would future Iranian-Israeli relations look? What would the architecture be of Iran’s future Israel policy? First and foremost, the full establishment of diplomatic relations is of great importance to a democratic Iran. Second, not only would a democratic Iran stop all counterproductive meddling in the Middle East conflict, but it would also articulate clearly that support for the Palestinians is not in Iran’s national security interest. On a more societal level, youth exchanges between the two countries in culture, economy, education and sports would build a strong pillar as well. Iran’s courageous democrats are not too far away from that true and lasting friendship between Iran and Israel, as the Iranian regime is not only morally bankrupt, but also facing the a financial crisis so severe it may lead to its demise. In The Romantic Manifesto, Ayn Rand wrote, “Anyone who fights for the future, lives in it today.” This applies so accurately to Iran’s younger generation and its democratic cause. They know in their minds and hearts that Teheran and Tel Aviv are natural allies.

            Iran-Israel Hostilities: Real or Fictitious?

            The Secret Alliance of Israel, Iran, and the Allies is “the alliance of the periphery” or “the periphery doctrine” which was never got affected neither by the coming of Khomeini to power nor by the anti-Zionist speeches.

            Despite Iranian opposition to Israel, Israel believed that Iraq posed an existential threat to Israel on a long-term basis. Iran appeared weak because of the chaotic domestic situation following the revolution. Iraq had an army more than four times the size of Israel’s and held the world’s third-largest oil reserves. Therefore, an Iraqi victory would have left Israel in a vulnerable position, and Iraq would have had undisputed hegemony over the Gulf region. It would have made the threat from the eastern front worse. Also, with the US intent on making Hussein their new ally, an Iraqi-US rapprochement would have had little bearing on Iraq’s hostility toward Israel. An Iranian victory, as unlikely as it appeared at the outbreak of the war, did not particularly worry Israel. Iran was thousand miles away and its ability to participate in a war against Israel was minimal, even if it did overcome Iraq. Thus, according to Professor David Menashri of Tel Aviv University, Israel’s foremost expert on Iran, “Throughout the 1980s, no one in Israel said anything about an Iranian threat — the word wasn’t even uttered”. Indeed, in October 1987, Yitzhak Rabin and Shaul Mofaz, the then Israeli minister of defense, said: “Iran is the best friend of Israel.”

            As a result of these continuing threats, soon after the Iran-Iraq War broke out, Israel covertly armed Iran without the knowledge of the US in what became known as the Iran-Contra Affair. This suggests that the relationship had not ended; it had simply changed to what has become known as “distant alliance.”

            According to Ronen Bergman, an Israeli reporter and the author of The Secret War with Iran: The 30-Year Covert Struggle for Control of a Rogue State, in 1981 Israel sold weapons worth $75 million to Iran. As for Trita Parsi, he divides Israeli support for Iran into two stages: The first stage was from 1981-1983, during which, according to the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University, Israel sold weapons worth more than $500 million dollars to Iran against Iranian Oil. Parsi quotes Ahmed Al-Haidari, an Iranian arms dealer who worked for the Khomeini regime, as saying that nearly 80 percent of the arms deals with Iran immediately after the outbreak of the Iran-Iraq war were made in Israel.

            The second stage was between 1985-86. It took the form of arms shipments sent from the US to Iran through Israel. This became known as the “Iran-Contra affair” or the “Iran-Contra scandal.” Israel managed to convince the Reagan administration to supply Iran with badly needed war material (HAWK missiles, TOW antitank missiles and spare weapons parts) in exchange for the freedom of US citizens held hostage in Lebanon. In addition, intelligence support was also provided to Iran, according to numerous reports which show that Israel had trainers working to support Iran during the war.

            The outbreak of the Iran-Iraq War in 1980 provided Israel with a unique window of strategic opportunity. Iraq had been neutralized as a threat to Israel and Syria had become isolated from the rest of the Arab world because it supported Iran. The war diminished the likelihood of a joint eastern-front attack by Syria, Iraq and Jordan.
            Therefore, the threat from the Soviet Union and Iraq were the two primary factors that guaranteed cooperation between Iran and Israel. However the end of the Cold War and the fall of Iraq eliminated these factors as a driver of cooperation between the two states, thereby fostering an environment conducive to increasing the confrontation between the countries and altering the balance of power in the region.

            Iran and Israel: The Best of Enemies or Friends?

            The relationship between Israel and Iran is highly complex. The two states cooperated behind the scenes well into the 1980s.

            Israel was founded on May 14, 1948 – and found itself immediately at war with its Arab neighbors.

            The Israelis managed to thwart the Arab attack, but the Palestine War showed Israel’s founding father David Ben Gurion quite clearly the hostile surroundings in which the young state would have to hold its ground. He developed a so-called “alliance of the periphery,” a foreign policy strategy that called for Israel to form alliances with non-Arab states and forces in the region, including Turkey, Lebanese Christians – and Iran.

            In the early 1950s, Tehran, too, was suspicious about growing Arab nationalism – in particular after 1953, when Iran developed into a dictatorship strongly influenced by the US.

            Tehran regarded Israel, which was also supported by Washington, as a welcome political counterbalance to its Arab neighbors. “The two countries had an excellent relationship,” says Henner Fürtig from the Hamburg-based GIGA-Institute.

            Israel trained agricultural experts, supplied technical know-how and helped build and train the Persian armed forces – in return for crude oil, a resource urgently needed in economically ambitious Israel.

            “In the late 1970s, Iran covered 80 percent of Israel’s oil requirements,” says Fürtig. “It was an existential relationship which was developed between the two states.”

            The 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran put an abrupt end to that cooperation.

            The new regime’s spiritual leader, Ayatollah Khomeini, harshly criticized Israel for the occupation of the Palestinian territories. As soon as he had assumed power, he cancelled all agreements with Israel. When Israel intervened in the Lebanese civil war and marched into southern Lebanon in 1982, Khomeini sent Iran’s revolutionary guards to Beirut to support the local Shiite militia. To this very day, the militant Hezbollah group that emerged back then is regarded as the long arm of Tehran in Lebanon.

            There were increasingly public tensions between Iran and Israel, but at the same time, cooperation was secretly revived, triggered by the start of the Iran-Iraq war in September 1980.

            Unimpressed by the revolution in Tehran, almost the entire western world supported Iraq, which had been armed to the hilt by the United States. Israel, on the other hand, regarded Saddam Hussein’s regime as the greater threat – and sided with Khomeini.

            According to a study conducted by the Tel Aviv Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), Israel supplied Iran with arms totaling $500 million (365 million euros) in the first three years of the war.

          7. 5thDrawer Avatar

            How the future relations would ‘look’ will be due to how much the propaganda on both sides of that ‘uber-religious’ coin has penetrated the minds of that ‘youth’, who wish for freedom still.

          8. Iran – Zionists Hostilities: Real or Fictitious?

            The Secret Alliance of Israel, Iran, and the Allies is “the alliance of the periphery” or “the periphery doctrine” which was never got affected neither by the coming of Khomeini to power nor by the anti-Zionist speeches.

            Despite Iranian opposition to Israel, Israel believed that Iraq posed an existential threat to Israel on a long-term basis. Iran appeared weak because of the chaotic domestic situation following the revolution. Iraq had an army more than four times the size of Israel’s and held the world’s third-largest oil reserves. Therefore, an Iraqi victory would have left Israel in a vulnerable position, and Iraq would have had undisputed hegemony over the Gulf region. It would have made the threat from the eastern front worse. Also, with the US intent on making Hussein their new ally, an Iraqi-US rapprochement would have had little bearing on Iraq’s hostility toward Israel. An Iranian victory, as unlikely as it appeared at the outbreak of the war, did not particularly worry Israel. Iran was thousand miles away and its ability to participate in a war against Israel was minimal, even if it did overcome Iraq. Thus, according to Professor David Menashri of Tel Aviv University, Israel’s foremost expert on Iran, “Throughout the 1980s, no one in Israel said anything about an Iranian threat — the word wasn’t even uttered”. Indeed, in October 1987, Yitzhak Rabin and Shaul Mofaz, the then Israeli minister of defense, said: “Iran is the best friend of Israel.”

            As a result of these continuing threats, soon after the Iran-Iraq War broke out, Israel covertly armed Iran without the knowledge of the US in what became known as the Iran-Contra Affair. This suggests that the relationship had not ended; it had simply changed to what has become known as “distant alliance.”

            According to Ronen Bergman, an Israeli reporter and the author of The Secret War with Iran: The 30-Year Covert Struggle for Control of a Rogue State, in 1981 Israel sold weapons worth $75 million to Iran. As for Trita Parsi, he divides Israeli support for Iran into two stages: The first stage was from 1981-1983, during which, according to the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University, Israel sold weapons worth more than $500 million dollars to Iran against Iranian Oil. Parsi quotes Ahmed Al-Haidari, an Iranian arms dealer who worked for the Khomeini regime, as saying that nearly 80 percent of the arms deals with Iran immediately after the outbreak of the Iran-Iraq war were made in Israel.

            The second stage was between 1985-86. It took the form of arms shipments sent from the US to Iran through Israel. This became known as the “Iran-Contra affair” or the “Iran-Contra scandal.” Israel managed to convince the Reagan administration to supply Iran with badly needed war material (HAWK missiles, TOW antitank missiles and spare weapons parts) in exchange for the freedom of US citizens held hostage in Lebanon. In addition, intelligence support was also provided to Iran, according to numerous reports which show that Israel had trainers working to support Iran during the war.

            The outbreak of the Iran-Iraq War in 1980 provided Israel with a unique window of strategic opportunity. Iraq had been neutralized as a threat to Israel and Syria had become isolated from the rest of the Arab world because it supported Iran. The war diminished the likelihood of a joint eastern-front attack by Syria, Iraq and Jordan.

            Therefore, the threat from the Soviet Union and Iraq were the two primary factors that guaranteed cooperation between Iran and Israel. However the end of the Cold War and the fall of Iraq eliminated these factors as a driver of cooperation between the two states, thereby fostering an environment conducive to increasing the confrontation between the countries and altering the balance of power in the region.

          9. Iran and Zionists: The Best of Enemies or Friends?

            The relationship between Israel and Iran is highly complex. The two states cooperated behind the scenes well into the 1980s.

            Israel was founded on May 14, 1948 – and found itself immediately at war with its Arab neighbors.

            The Israelis managed to thwart the Arab attack, but the Palestine War showed Israel’s founding father David Ben Gurion quite clearly the hostile surroundings in which the young state would have to hold its ground. He developed a so-called “alliance of the periphery,” a foreign policy strategy that called for Israel to form alliances with non-Arab states and forces in the region, including Turkey, Lebanese Christians – and Iran.

            In the early 1950s, Tehran, too, was suspicious about growing Arab nationalism – in particular after 1953, when Iran developed into a dictatorship strongly influenced by the US.

            Tehran regarded Israel, which was also supported by Washington, as a welcome political counterbalance to its Arab neighbors. “The two countries had an excellent relationship,” says Henner Fürtig from the Hamburg-based GIGA-Institute.

            Israel trained agricultural experts, supplied technical know-how and helped build and train the Persian armed forces – in return for crude oil, a resource urgently needed in economically ambitious Israel.

            “In the late 1970s, Iran covered 80 percent of Israel’s oil requirements,” says Fürtig. “It was an existential relationship which was developed between the two states.”

            The 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran put an abrupt end to that cooperation.

            The new regime’s spiritual leader, Ayatollah Khomeini, harshly criticized Israel for the occupation of the Palestinian territories. As soon as he had assumed power, he cancelled all agreements with Israel. When Israel intervened in the Lebanese civil war and marched into southern Lebanon in 1982, Khomeini sent Iran’s revolutionary guards to Beirut to support the local Shiite militia. To this very day, the militant Hezbollah group that emerged back then is regarded as the long arm of Tehran in Lebanon.

            There were increasingly public tensions between Iran and Israel, but at the same time, cooperation was secretly revived, triggered by the start of the Iran-Iraq war in September 1980.

            Unimpressed by the revolution in Tehran, almost the entire western world supported Iraq, which had been armed to the hilt by the United States. Israel, on the other hand, regarded Saddam Hussein’s regime as the greater threat – and sided with Khomeini.

            According to a study conducted by the Tel Aviv Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), Israel supplied Iran with arms totaling $500 million (365 million euros) in the first three years of the war.

          10. Iran and Zionists: An Age Old Alliance

            The regime of Iran pretends that there is a deep hostility between Iranians and Israelis. On the other side, the regime of Iran has been trying to prove that the Iranian people care about Palestinians in a special way. Both of these claims are baseless and wrong. Iranians do not feel any hostility towards Israelis and Iranians have no special place in their hearts for the Palestinians.

            The secret Israel-Iran alliance isn’t much written about (it’s a secret, after all). Here are some quick points to think about:

            1. The ‘doctrine of the periphery’, the idea that Israel’s natural allies are non-Arab states not adjacent to Israel, which Susser indicates is dead, is very much alive, applying now both to Turkey and the Kurds (an impossibility in the long run, which both Turkey and the Kurds are going to find out), and applies most of all to the Persians (Cyrus the Great was the liberator of the Jews!)

            2. Iran facilitated the immigration of the Jews from Iraq to Israel in 1948-1949

            3. Continuing dealings between Ledeen and Ghorbanifar, who represents Iranian business interests (the real long-term power base in Iran)

            4. Israeli support for Iran in the Iran-Iraq war

            5. A little thing we like to call Iran-Contra, although the Contras got very little out of it, should have been called Iran-Israel, as it was primarily a deal for the Israelis to sell arms to Iran.

            The relationship is literally thousands of years old, and a few Crypto Shiite Ayatollahs aren’t going to slow it down. The fact that Iran lies completely outside the proposed boundaries of Greater Israel is a bonus.

            Iranians had a great role in the ancient history of the Jews. The name of Cyrus the great is mentioned many times in the Old Testament. Cyrus freed the Jews while they were living in exile and under captivity in Babylon. He let them return to Jerusalem and helped them to build their main temple. The dates of these events are occasions for some of the most important celebrations of the Jews. This is also a source of great honor for Iranians as the flag bearers of the religious tolerance, human rights, and respect for the “others”. In addition to these historical relations, there are many similarities between Iran and Israel, such as:

            1- Iran, like Israel, is a non-Arab country in the Middle East. Amir Taheri, a prominent Iranian journalist, has mentioned in his article: “If Israel had never appeared on the map, the energy of the pan-Arab nationalism movement, which dominated Arab politics in the post-war era, would have been directed against two other neighbors: Turkey and Iran. To a certain extent, it was anyway. Even today, the Arab League claims that the Turkish province of Iskanderun is ‘usurped Arab territory’ and regards the Iranian province of Khuzestan as ‘occupied Arab land’.”

            2- Iran and Israel both follow a religion that is different from the Arabs. Israelis are mostly Jews, and Iranians are mostly Shiite (Sunni do not consider Shiites as a branch of Islam in many Arab countries). Iranians are not serious Muslims (compare the behaviors of Iranians to the people of the Arab countries) and it is accepted by some researchers that Shiite sect was “invented” by Iranians as a kind of instrument to be different from the Sunni Arabs.

            3- Iran, like Israel, is accused by the Arabs for being an occupier of the Arab lands. The case of Israel is clear and the case of Iran is related to the three Islands in the Persian Gulf that the UAE has put a claim on them. (The UAE did not exist before 1971).

            Therefore, the two countries must have the best relations. However, the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran claims to be the first enemy of Israel. Why? Because: the government of the Islamic Republic is also the worst enemy of the Iranian people.

            A look at the record of the Islamic Republic of Iran reveals that that during the last quarter of the century, this regime has done everything possible to eradicate the Iranian identity of Iran. If they have not succeeded to do so, it was not due to their failure to work hard or their use of less violent tactics as compared to the Afghan Talibans. The reason was that the people of Iran did not let them to get what they wanted. The regime of Iran is determined to use the case of Israel as:

            1- A pretext to fight the people of Iran who do not feel any hostility towards the Israelis.

            2- The regime has failed in all cultural, economic, and political fields and it wants to find an enemy to accuse for its failures.

            3- The regime of Iran has lost its legitimacy and it is trying to find a mission for itself.

            The people of Iran do not feel to have a special obligation to defend the rights of the Palestinians too. There are countless Arab countries, with money and power and good relations and they are in much better position to defend the Palestinians.

            In fact, the Arabs, including the Palestinians, never have asked or welcomed the intervention of the Iranian regime in the Palestinian issue. They consider this as Arabic issue and consider the intervention of Iran as step from the “outside” and they look at Iran as they look at Israel. During the Iran-Iraq war (1980-1988), no Arab country or person, including the Palestinians and the Syrians, who were fed by the Iranian regime, participated on behalf of Iran. As far as the case of three Iranian Islands in the Persian Gulf is concerned, all Arab states, including Palestinians and Syrians, have stood behind the baseless claims of the UAE.

            Perhaps one of the most important acts during the Iraq-Iran war (1980-1988) was the daring attack of Israel against the nuclear facilities of Iraq (Osiraq). If Saddam had managed to complete its nuclear bomb, he would not have hesitated one second for using it against Iran (Khomeini was the same).

          11. Iran and Zionists: Similar Goals Hideous Paths

            Are they identical sides of the same coin?

            Let’s revisit their glorious history and alliance, shall we?

            “How can we tolerate the disgrace of having our Islamic country turned into a base for Israel and Zionism?. . . Israel wants to take our economy in its clutches. Israel wants to destroy our trade and agriculture. Israel wants to destroy that which stands between them and domination. This buffer is formed by the ulama who have to be broken. . . In this way Israel gets what it wants, and in this way the government of Iran threatens us with contempt to achieve its base wishes.” -Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Qum, June 1963

            After the Shiite fundamentalist movement led by Ayatollah Khomeini seized political power in Iran, many observers predicted the end of the close political-military relationship between the shah’s Iran and Israel, and the beginning of a realignment of Iran toward nationalist Arab states and movements including the Palestine Liberation Organization. Within two years, however, both predictions proved wrong.

            Soon after the overthrow of the shah, PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat went to Tehran, where Khomeini and a group of Iranian religious and secular leaders expressed their support for the struggle of the Palestinian people against Israel. The newly established Islamic regime closed down the Israeli Embassy there and offered the building to the PLO as its new office in Tehran. After the American Embassy was seized by a mob, Yasser Arafat journeyed again to Tehran to plead for the release of the U.S. staff. Had Khomeini allowed the PLO leader to conduct the Americans safely out of Iran, it could have reversed years of negative imagery of the Palestinians in the United States. Khomeini, however, had plans of his own to hold the Americans for arms if possible, and for the release of Iranian funds frozen in U.S. banks.

            After their spectacular beginning, relations between the Khomeini regime and the PLO quickly deteriorated. Iranian officials made clear that documents recovered from the Israeli Embassy would not be handed over to the PLO along with the building. The Iranians said the documents belonged to the state of Iran and could not be turned over to a foreign government or organization. (Iranian opposition newspapers claimed, however, that the documents revealed that influential members of the Iranian clergy had received regular payments from the shah’s secret police.) Soon after this incident, the PLO office in Ahwaz, in southwestern Iran, was closed down and accused by the Iranian government of spying and interfering in the internal affairs of the country.

            No country has helped Iranian terrorism and subversion more than Israel, which emerged after the 1979 departure of the shah as one of Iran’s closest and most reliable allies.

            The increasing tension between the Khomeini regime and the PLO was a byproduct of the Iranian government’s attempts to penetrate and subsequently take over the Palestinian national movement. The Iranian strategy was first to create an Islamic fundamentalist faction within the PLO, then use this faction to replace the PLO’s predominantly secular nationalist leadership with a new pro-Iranian fundamentalist leadership. As the PLO leadership increasingly resisted Iran’s fundamentalist penetration, the Islamic regime moved away from the PLO, attacking it in the state-controlled media as a group comprised of “those who refuse to admit that the Palestinian cause is an inseparable component of an Islamic movement.”

            The final breakdown of the relationship between Iran and the PLO corresponded with the outbreak of war with Iraq and the sudden desperate need of the Khomeini regime to find allies willing to help in Iran’s war efforts. The Iranian military found itself unable to carry out successful counteroffensives against Iraq due to a lack of spare parts and armaments. As a result, Iranian national morale showed signs of cracking.

            ** The Beginnings of the Israeli-Iranian Secret Alliance

            It was at this critical juncture that Israel and Iran began to restore their historic secret alliance. The origin of the Israeli-Iranian relationship dates back to the 1950s, when emerging radical Arab nationalist movements and governments caused much anxiety both in Tel Aviv and Tehran. Although Iran had recognized Israel in 1950, relations between the two countries at first remained distant.

            The unification of Egypt and Syria in 1958 seemed to be transforming Arab nationalism into a dynamic political and ideological force. Israel and Iran, both of which greatly feared Arab unity, saw these first tangible steps toward it as a major threat. By the early 1960s, therefore, the Israeli-Iranian relationship had evolved to include trade as well as military intelligence cooperation and coordination. David Ben Gurion, Golda Meir, Abba Eban, Yitzhak Rabin, Yigal Allon, Moshe Dayan, Menachem Begin, and many lesser Israeli leaders visited Iran and discussed the common interests between the two countries with the shah.

            When it became clear that Iraq could not win, continuation of the Iran-Iraq war was considered beneficial for Israel because it divided the Arab states into two antagonistic camps.

            Petroleum was the major Iranian export to Israel, and military equipment the principal Israeli export to Iran. By 1968, according to Edward A. Bayne (Persian Kingship in Transition), “virtually every general officer in the shah’s army had visited Israel, and hundreds of Iranian junior officers had undergone some aspect of Israeli training.” In contrast to the assertion made repeatedly in the popular media, therefore, Israel’s close contacts with the Iranian military did not begin in the early 1980s but were a continuation, with only a brief interruption, of the relationship going back to the early 1960s.

            ** Israel Penetrates Iran During Shah’s Reign

            Between 1962 and the shah’s downfall in 1979, Israel’s military intelligence established close contacts with many of the Iranian officers being trained by the Israeli military. Israel also expanded its intelligence network in Iran by using members of Iran’s large Jewish community. William H. Sullivan, the last U.S. ambassador to Iran, noted that “the Israelis enjoyed an information network that was second to none, thanks to the large colony of 80,000 Jews who penetrated into almost every aspect of Iranian life.”

            One of the most prominent of these Iranian Jews with special contacts with the Israelis was Albert Hakim, who has subsequently figured so prominently in the Israeli-brokered sales of U.S. arms for American hostages. Hakim’s company, Stanford Technology, dealt in sophisticated electronics and had extensive business dealings with the shah’s military.

            Besides its strong links with the Iranian military and the Jewish community in Iran, Israel also enjoyed a very close relationship with the shah’s notorious secret police, Savak. The popular belief in Iran was that Savak agents were trained by the Mossad and the CIA. Richard T. Sale reported in the Washington Post on May 9, 1977, that “Innumerable Iranians, including many in a position to know, told me that the Israelis oversee Savak’s techniques.”

            Throughout the shah’s reign, Israel also recruited Savak agents to work with Israel’s external intelligence service, the Mossad. One Savak agent recruited by the Israelis was Manucher Ghorbanifar, who later emerged both as a key player in the Iran-contra secret operations and as the originator of false reports of armed Libyan “hit squads” headed for Washington that had the U.S. national capital tied in knots throughout much of 1981.

            By arming Iran to the extent that it was able to turn the tide of the war against Iraq, Israel raised the prestige of the Khomeini regime and fueled Islamic fundamentalist sentiments in the Arab world.

            After the fall of the shah, Ghorbanifar and other such former Savak agents proved to be extremely useful to Israel because they continued to maintain their contracts with the Israelis while working for the Khomeini regime. Their central role in the Iranian-Israeli (and U.S.) relationship was made possible by Khomeini’s decision to leave the shah’s secret police untouched. Beyond executing three former chiefs of Savak and changing the name of the remaining organization to Savama, the Khomeini regime did little to alter its functions. Many of its agents were called back and assigned the same duties by the Khomeini regime that they had performed for the shah.

            ** Double Agents Sell Iran Israeli, U.S. Arms for Its War With Iraq

            After 1980, with the Iranian military desperately short of spare parts for its war with Iraq, Ghorbanifar and other former Savak agents were assigned to find badly needed armaments. Ghorbanifar’s principal Israeli contact was Gen. Yaacov Nimrodi, a former Israeli military attache in Tehran who had become a successful arms merchant. Nimrodi, while he was head of the Mossad station in Iran, had been the Israeli official closest to the shah and to the former chief of Savak, Gen. Nassiri.

            As early as Nov. 30, 1980, the London Observer reported that Nimrodi had sold the Khomeini regime advanced U.S. military hardware including “Lance missiles and the latest laser-guided Copperhead anti-tank shells.”

            Nimrodi subsequently played a role in organizing the mysterious shipments of U.S. arms from Israel to Iran which were exposed when, in July 1981, one of the three planes carrying them crashed on the Turkish-Soviet border. Israeli officials said the three shipments had been authorized by the Reagan administration shortly after the hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran were released on President Reagan’s inauguration day.

            In his memoirs published in 1983, Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter’s national security adviser, said the U.S. government had become aware of Israeli shipments of U.S.-made armaments to the Khomeini regime in 1980. Defense Minister Ariel Sharon himself admitted in May 1982 that Israel was selling military equipment to the Khomeini government. Five months later, the then-Israeli ambassador to the U.S., Moshe Arens, stated that Israeli shipments of arms to Iran were “taking place in coordination with the highest level of the U.S. government.”

            Ghorbanifar’s role as a double agent working for both the Israeli Mossad and Khomeini’s secret police assumed greater significance when the Israelis decided to involve the U.S. directly so that Israel could continue shipping arms to Iran at a time when the U.S. was urging its NATO allies to avoid such sales. After David Kimche, director general of Israel’s Foreign Ministry and former deputy chief of Mossad, suckered-to use Secretary of State George Shultz’s term-the Reagan administration into selling arms to Iran, Ghorbanifar and others enticed Col. Oliver North and other American negotiators to remain involved by suggesting diversion of the profits to the Contras.

            From the very beginning of the Iran-Iraq war, the Jerusalem Post reported on Dec. 6, 1986, the entire Israeli intelligence community “supported the policy of backing Iran because Iraq has taken part in every war against Israel and is an integral component of the Eastern Front, whereas Khomeini’s fundamentalism is first and foremost a threat to the Arabs themselves.”

            ** Israel Gains Economically and Politically From Iran-Iraq War

            When it became clear that Iraq could not win, continuation of the Iran-Iraq war was considered beneficial for Israel because it divided the Arab states into two antagonistic camps, with Syria and Libya supporting Iran, and Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan backing Iraq. The increasing instability caused by the war permitted Israel to pose as the only internally stable country and the only reliable U.S. ally in the region. Meanwhile, the Israeli-Iranian arms tie enabled Israel to renew the relationship which has always been central to Israeli strategic objectives in the region.

            Israel’s faltering arms industry has profited immensely from the Iran-Iraq war. Despite assertions by Israeli officials, Israel’s sales were not mainly of munitions for Israeli-made systems that had formerly been sold to the shah, but included Hawk anti-aircraft missiles, TOW anti-tank missiles, and aircraft spare parts. In this case, as in the past, Israel’s export-geared arms industry was a primary consideration in political decision-making.

            A U.S. Department of State special report, entitled “Iran’s Use of International Terrorism,” asserts that “major goals of Iranian-backed terrorism and subversion include spreading its Shiite fundamentalist revolution to other Islamic states, creating a copy of an Iranian Islamic Republic in Lebanon, and driving Western influence-esspecially that of the U.S.-from the Middle East.”

            It would have been only fair for the State Department to add that no country has helped Iranian terrorism and subversion more than Israel. By helping to arm Iran to the extent that it was able to turn the tide of the war against Iraq, Israel raised the prestige of the Khomeini regime in the region and fueled Islamic fundamentalist sentiments in the Arab world, particularly among the Lebanese Shiites who are now the principal source of terrorism directed against Americans in the Middle East.

            Even since the public disclosure of the Iran-contra connection, the Israelis have continued to supply the Khomeini regime with armaments made in the U.S. and the People’s Republic of China. The Danish Seaman’s Union reported that between September 1986 and March 1987, Israel constituted the major exporter of military supplies to Iran.

            Iranian opposition groups now cite Israeli press reports to demonstrate that Israeli cooperation with the Khomeini regime increasingly resembles cooperation with the shah’s Iran. These groups say Israel has been training Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, who are charged not only with internal suppression of the Iranian people and continuation of the war with Iraq, but also with the training of Hezbollah members in Lebanon. They are the same “Party of God” terrorists who are holding Americans and other foreigners for ransom, and who have undermined American influence in what once was the most pro-American country in the Middle East.

          12. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Let’s hear it for ‘unionists’. Shippers know where goods go.

          13. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Wargame … I think ‘our Mr. pOl’ has a better set of books to draw some relevant conclusions from, than those ancient scripts that need so much translation, which no-one can figure out any relevance to the 21st century from except you seekers of prophecy.

          14. wargame1 Avatar

            I never tried to make the prophesy come true. I only presented the prophesies which corresponding the present situation. Enjoy reading them and remember them as reference.

          15. some times you are deluding the the true meaning of some hadiths fit to your side.

          16. Iran and Zionists: Made For Each Other?

            They are inseparable, “Two Bodies One Soul”, come from the same Jewish tree.

            Israel and Iran need each other. That is the way it has been and that is the way it will be.

            Iran was the great hope of the periphery strategy, a hope realized and utilized to an impressive extent. The success of the strategy in Iran, however, became known only after the alliance itself had collapsed under the pressure of Islamic fundamentalism.

            Still, Israel was second only to the United States in its involvement and influence in Iran, and in some areas, such as domestic intelligence, Israeli involvement was even greater. But even Khomeini’s rise to power and the internal changes in Iran did not completely discourage those in Israel who still dreamt of a revival of this grand alliance (Khomeini’s Iran is a hidden Israeli ally, just as Pahlavi’s Iran was, though in a less hidden manner), as we shall see.

            The Iran-contra affair grew out of earlier Israeli deals with Iran and the continuing contact prior and after Shah. Israel always had the connections with Iran, and the intelligence.

            There is truth in the laws of geopolitics: whoever rules Teheran becomes, willy-nilly, an ally of whoever rules Jerusalem. The rule has proven its validity since the days of Cyrus.

            There are those who asks whether it would be desirable to prepare the ground for a renewal of overt (or semi-overt) ties, in preparation for the day when the world uncover the hidden alliance.

            1. Israel should keep its traditional contacts with the Iranian military.

            2. A continuing proxy war between Iran, a non-arab state with arab states is to Israel’s strategic advantage.

            3. The proxy wars will cause rifts in the Arab world, with Syria and Russia supporting Iran.

            4. Use of Iran and Allies to create and arm extreme radical forces (ISIS, Hezbollah, etc.) in the Middle East and elsewhere.

            ** Strategic Advantages Of Their and Their Allies Unholy Alliance:

            – To prevent any peace settlement for the state of Palestine

            – To keep Arab hostility, while the common interests of Teheran and Jerusalem will be recognized

            – Iran destabilizes the Arab states and neutralizes the atrocities and apartheid of Palestine and Palestinians

            – To keep the hold over Arab Sunni states intact

            – To take over Muslim lands, Holy Places, Wealth, and Resources

            – To create false flags, proxy and sectarian wars

            – To sensationalize barbaric acts and keep the fear factor alive

            – To Keep the hatred towards Islam and Sunnis always boiling

            – To divert world’s attention from their deceptions, treacheries, hidden agendas, atrocities, and illegal, corrupt, ruthless, barbaric rules and dominance

            – To justify their or their puppets rule

            – To showcase world their dependence and need to counter and protect them against their own created evil entities

            – To manipulate and use the ignorant, followers of other religions, atheists, etc. in hating, attacking, and demonizing Islam and Sunni Muslims in social media and elsewhere

            – To keep the masses ignorant and enslaved

            – To have total control over people, their minds and lives

            – To keep the masses away from God and Religion

            – To make people despise God and Religion

            – To bring people closer to Satan

            – To fulfill the dream of forming a greater Israel / Shia crescent (Persian Empire)

            – To create events, wars, weapons, biological warfare’s, etc. which would aid in population annihilation and reduction

            – To create an apocalyptic type of World war

            – To pave the way for New World Order, One World Government, One Global Currency, One Universal Army, One Universal Religion, etc.

            – To lay the platform for their Mahdi / Moshiach (Dajjal / Anti-Christ / Lucifer / Ra, etc.) upon his arrival to rule the World and it’s remaining people

          17. wargame1 Avatar

            “Those who have caused schism (splitting or division) in their religion and they have become Shia (sects or groups), you (Prophet Mohammad صلى الله عليه وسلم ) are not one of them in any way. Their case (for judgment & punishment) is up to Allah. Then, He (Allah) will tell (confront) them about what they used to do.” Quran 6:159)

            So why do you advocate unity with those who slander against the wives and the companion of the prophet???

          18. wargame1 Avatar

            Anas b. Malik reported that Allaah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) said: The dajjal would be followed by seventy thousand Jews of Isfahan wearing Persian shawls.(SahihMuslim7034)

            Imran Hossain is a mini Dajjal who are trying to goad people in supporting the Dajjal/

          19. Dajjal is western countries.Yakjuj makjuj , gog magog is Russia.

          20. wargame1 Avatar

            Iran is not in the west and the main followers of Dajjal live in Iran

          21. the prophet said..jews from isafahan is only the followers of dajjal..not dajjal him self. I read all you hadith before.

          22. wargame1 Avatar

            Mohammad bin Musab said that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: ” Seventy thousand from the Jews of Isfahan (a city in Iran) wearing Al-Tijan (crowns or turbans) will come out with the Dajjal.” (Musnad Ahmad and Tabarani)

            The Iranian Shits are those Jews pretending to be Muslims

          23. wargame1 Avatar

            Abu Saeed Al-Khudri said that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: ” The Dajjal will be followed by seventy thousand from my Umma (nation of Muslims) wearing Al-Sijan (type of hoods or turbans, associated with Sijistan, known today as Sistan, in Iran). ” (Al-Baghawi and Abd-Al-Razzaq)

          24. this make sense.

          25. wargame1 Avatar

            Abu Huraira said that The Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: ” The Dajjal will go down to Khuz (lands east of Iran) and Kerman (region in Iran) with seventy thousand (soldiers) whose faces look like flattened shields.” (Musnad Ahmad)

          26. wargame1 Avatar

            Abu Bakr Al-Siddiq (r.a.) narrated that The Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: “The Dajjal emerges from a land in the East called Khorasan . He will be followed by people whose faces are like flattened shields.” (Tirmizi, Ahmad, Ibn Maja, and Al-Haakim)
            Khorashan is the region that includes Northeastern part of Iran, Afghanistan, parts of Pakistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, etc.

          27. Dajjal is Christian western nation.May be these people is only a followers of dajjal.

          28. wargame1 Avatar

            Anas bin Malik said that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said “Seventy thousand of the Jews of Isfahan (a city in Iran) will follow the Dajjal, wearing Tayalisa (type of hoods or turbans).” ( Sahih Muslim)

          29. wargame1 Avatar

            You read shit and spread shit

          30. of course i m not.

          31. wargame1 Avatar

            Gog magog are a race of people and they are not country

          32. nagy_michael2 Avatar
            nagy_michael2

            he is very confused and bemused with ISIS dogs all right. there is no doubt he loves their style of disciplining everyone including the sunnis who do not believes in their way of livings. they kill boys for watching soccer but they rape them in their tents according to several sunni boys who managed to ran away from the camps. they smoke hasish and pot and everything and yet you get flogged or hanged if you caught smoking in public. yes i wish he goes there and live among them so maybe we don’t see his ugly face here.

          33. wargame1 Avatar

            This ugly Zabada wont last here long as you can see that he has exposed himself in such a way that he survives only if the Daeash Dogs win. Once their perishing end starts you will find this nutcase running away.

          34. I support all peacefull people..what ever they are going to believe.it is their business..and I oppose wrong doing and criminals and an oppressor.

          35. he he he ..i m not Syiah..I scare to God to convert to Syiah.I will burnt in the hell for ever for deluding religion as politic tool and mixing Persian cultures in islam at its worse.i will live die sunnis Syafie for ever.I m also oppose Wahabis who are also using religion mixing with Muhammad Abdul wahab doctrines as a politic tool in Najad 200 year a go to dehtrone King Husin in Mecca.Both syiah and wahabis got their large territories,in Iran and Arab Saudi,but the true Islamic teaching are destroyed badly by the two,Syiah and wahabi.Both are not a religion movement but a political movement wrapped badly with religion.

        4. After that they come to Iraq and killed a million of sunnis..only for oil and democracy….dacoit are helping for some time ..after that they will rob and kill again and a gain..they are helping to defeat Russia influence..in order to control. Helping Zionist bankers to expand it all over the world.. to enslave all people if they can.no matter how many are going to kill people on the earth.Unfonurtely i know many that you don,t know.

          1. nagy_michael2 Avatar
            nagy_michael2

            killed millions of sunnis? how much weed you smoked 3 days ago? where do you come up with such inflated numbers? what about al Qaeda who blow themselves up in mosques? who killed both sunnis and shiites? what about invading Kuwait by Saddam? what about gassing the kurds by Saddam? you should live in the fantasy island of ISIS you both made good propagandist. and please take the USEquaISIS with you. because you both belong with them.

      2. Reasonableman Avatar
        Reasonableman

        Isis has killed more muslims sunnis then any other party on the ground, you choose to look at the good they do rather then the good and bad.
        Ofcourse nobody can be doing only bad 24/7.
        Who are the Isis scholars?? Turki benali? Who the hell was he before the war?? Yallah tell me he has a PHD in fiqh and hadis. Guess what PHD is a westerm award system!

        Take a step back zabada, ofcourse america helps with strings attached. If it was not for them though there would have been a bloodbooth like what the TTP done to the school children. WORSE!!

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar

          slight disagreement … some CAN do bad 24/7.

          1. Arabs gun down the prophet descendants in Iraq ? It,s scare me.At the past they are killing Caliph Ali,Caliph Uthman,Hasan,Hussin,the prophet,s grand sons in Syiah and Sunni war….Caliph .Umar killed by a Persian.I ve nothing to say…Jews are killing prophets..Arabs are killing Prophet,s descendants.What happen to them ?That why there are too many chaos..they killed the Prophet,s sons!!!!!!!..HENCE I VE NIOTHING TO SAID..

          2. wargame1 Avatar

            It was the Khawarij who killed Ali Osman etc. Today they rise again and they are called Daesh.

          3. I m nothing to do on any side..I know not who are good..or bad..it is their business to kill each others..god will judge them.I m wonder..how they can killed the prophet,s descendants in Iraq.I guess that why god punished them with many chaos there..Their greediness on politic make many of them blind.

        2. America and the west killed them more..you are weak in mathematics.count its out carefully.

          1. wargame1 Avatar

            Daesh doesnt have any scholar. They have some who they call scholar such as Anjum Chowdhury , Abu Katada etc. If you do their background check then you find them as pimp , or nightclub bouncer etc.

          2. Reasonableman Avatar
            Reasonableman

            Lol these guys have their own school of thought, beyond the stars.

            although didn’t abu qatada and al maqdisi denounced isis? And the burning of the pilot?

            Its also quite mischievous the release of al maqdisi took place 8hours after the horrific video was aired. Rumor has it he was interviewed by king abdullah himself, but I have not found any videos. Sort of a pattern happening here, the last time he was released he also lashed out at ISIS and was imprisoned again.

            May allah hasten the release of the prisoners who have done nothing except say la ilaha ilallah.

          3. wargame1 Avatar

            There is a good reason of the release of that Khawarij Maqdisi because Maqdisi himself is now identify Daesh as Khawarij!!! If you recall the time of Ali Ibn Abu Talib then you find that after the debate with the Khawarij by the uncle of the prophet i.e. Abbas , many Khawarij left their group. So Its clear that Jordan is using this tool to denounce those Khawarij dogs. Do you know what the Daesh Khawarij say in reply? They claimed that those one of their own denounce Daesh because they are jealous of the militants’ success!

          4. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Repeating the ‘mantras’ all the time is certainly not a reason for incarceration … unless the mantra advocates picking up a gun.

          5. nonsense…

          6. Reasonableman Avatar
            Reasonableman

            An interesting possible scenario for Sinai in coming months/years:

            This scenario wouldn’t have crossed anyone’s mind a few years ago, but the events in Iraq and Syria have given such a scenario a possibility.

            We all know what has happened most recently in Syria and Iraq where ISIS destroyed the border between the two countries and formed a “state”. Such a thing wasn’t on anyone’s mind a year before it occurred, but none the less, it occurred.

            We all know of the great existence of Salafi Jihadi organisations in Sinai which date back to the 1990s. But most recently we have witnessed the rise of a group who have given Bay’ah to ISIS and called Sinai a Wilayah. 

            Given what has happened in Iraq and Syria, the same scenario is not far fetched from happening between Sinai and Gaza. Meaning, ISIS Wilayah Sinai will destroy the border between Sinai and Gaza and declare that area part of their state.

            If such a move happens, it will mean:

            -There will be bloodshed between ISIS and Hamas/other palestinian factions, since ISIS makes Takfir on them. This will take the focus away from Israel, keeping the Zionists satisfied at Muslims spilling each other’s blood. 

            -America would benefit, and would allow such a move to take place. This doesn’t necessarily mean that America will have a direct link with those taking this move, but they may have knowledge and pave the way for it to happen, since it will weaken Gazas resistance, and give Israel a right to invade it.

            Thoughts on this scenario? Mr Einstein

          7. it is true..i ve your point..America and Zionist movement take advantage on Arab,s tribalism..you know what is tribalism..it is old kind of cultures,politic and way of life..America and Zionist take advantage on these stone age nation to destroy and enslave them.America is not helping.Divided and is Western and Zionist games long a go…now they are going to plant that in Arab world..to save Israel..to control petroleum..gas..and also politic…Salafi is not a priority to most of Arabs..Salafi is a political movement long ago,it is not a big problem in asrab world..the true problem is their leaders and politic..they are not satisfied on their leaders..who are served too long on their office..oppressing and killing civilian isis is common by dictator in Arab world.In monarchy countries also annoying people.At any kind of politic,they have no civilization at all..no tech..no progress.Israel occupation and America or Russian influence separated them badly..some of Arab love America..some of them them hates America.Some of them love democracy..some are not.Arabs not understand democracy at all..at the same time..Zionist preaching their democracy in Arab world..democracy now is a tool to zionist to control the world..so they force democracy on Arab.Saddam.Libya and ect.Zionist goal is oil and politic..also to protect Israel.No powerfull political instrument that can defend Arab from zionist…nor powerfull weapons..so some of them now go back to their four first caliph..likely to America who force Arab to accept democracy..so these Arabs..will force caliphate on Arabs..since ..in their believe it is only the way to save Arab from Zionist.the two America and Arab caliphate will fight fiercely in order to win.It is war that you see now.These wars will prolong to may decades in future.America eventually make mistake..very big mistake ..by mess up with Iraqis Sunnis..it is like they are mess up with a sleeping lion.I tell you this nation..tribes..theology..who are destroyed Rome empire and Persian Empire..many will not believe in me..they going to believe me after 30 years in future..at the past..it is impossible to weak Arabs to dethrone Rome and Persia..but these tribes did..these caliphate will win in near future..Arabs will understand and accept caliphate in near future ..like American who force Arabs to accept ..democracy..so Arabs will force caliphate on all Arabs.Now the war of the two just started ..both side will force their believe on Arabs.Zionist open democracy vs caliphate..Arab,s limited democracy.Let we see.

          8. wargame1 Avatar

            I have read prophesy regarding this fight in Palestine and will post them one of the coming days inshallah

          9. Reasonableman Avatar
            Reasonableman

            https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=28uOe7LFjTk

            Alshaykh rabee al madkhali ra7imallah calls on ahlul sunnah of yemen to fight the houthis.

          10. This is very obvious and this is going to be ugly for these houthis. Iran is further exposed that its main goal is to expand its Majoosi Empire.

          11. Abdullah ibn Hawalah said: The Messenger of Allah (Peace be upon him) said: “Matters will run their course until you become three armies: an army in AshSham (Syria), an army in ‘Iraq, and an army in theYemen.” I said: “O Messenger of Allah, which one I should join ? ” He said: “You should go to AshSham, for it is the best of Allah’s lands, and the best of His servants will be drawn to there. If you do not (go to AshSham), go to the Yemen and drink from its wells. For Allah has guaranteed me that He will look after AshSham and its people.” (Abu Dawud).

            We have seen the Army of Syria i.e The FSA and the Ilam Brigade then Iran and Assad brought the Daesh Dogs in to confront the Syrian army. The Iraqi sunnis formed their army too and then Nuri Maliki brought Daesh Dogs to confront the Sunni Army. Now Yemen…You can see the pattern here. The Sunnis here will form their army to fight and its obvious that the Houthis will bring the Al-Qaeda/Daesh Dogs here. You may notice the chronological event in the hadis i.e. First its the Army of Syria then Iraq and then Yemen.

          12. I guess you are FSA politician.You have your selfish plan.No evidence at all Daesh bring up by Assda and Syiah Iraqis to fight FSA.Both FSA ans Daesh are Suynnis..they can,t fighing each others.Both will burnt in hell fire if they are going to kill each others.You are nonsense.

          13. Huzaifa said that the Messenger of Allah (Peace be upon him) said : “When the dark people come after the Arabs, they will be defeated and thrown into the lowest part of the Earth. While these circumstances exist, the Sufyani will come with three hundred and sixty men until he reaches Damascus. After a month, he will befollowed by thirty thousand from Kalb (tribe). He will send an army to Iraq and kill one hundred thousand in Az-Zawra (possibly refers to Baghdad)…” (Nuaim Bin Hammad’s Kitab Al-Fitan, Tabarani, and Abu Amru Uthman bin Saeed Ad-Dani )
            ————————————————–
            There are three Sufiany and this hadis is possibly referring to the third Sufyani. dark people are possibly these Houthies, Boko Haram etc.

          14. Assad and his Alawis is Bani kalb.Thanks for tha Hadith.

          15. Anti ISIS Avatar

            Hey Zabada, eat shit you animal.

          16. kheah..kheah..kheha..i eat many thing..but shits.You make my day.

          17. Anti ISIS Avatar

            Oh no ZIBada, it’s most certainly shit you are eating and spewing out.

          18. no mem…please mem..mem..I eat nice thing only mem.

          19. Abi Qubayl said: ” In Africa, there will be a prince for 12 years. Then, after him, there will be a Fitna (strife). Then, a dark man will rule and fill it with justice. Then, he will marsh toward the Mahdi and declares allegiance to him (Mahdi) and fights for him.” (Nuaim bin Hammad’s Kitab Al-Fitan, Jalal-uddine AsSuyuti’s Al-Urf Al-Wardi fi Akhbar Al-Mahdi, a part of Al-Hawi li Al-Fatawa)

          20. Abi Otba, a Mala of Amr bin Al-Aas said: ” Egypt will be devastated when it gets hit by the four arrows: the arrow of the Turks , arrow of the Romans, arrow of Abyssinia , and arrow of people of Andalusia.” (Nuaim bin Hammad’s Kitab al-Fitan)

            ———————-
            After the present conflict of there will be Roman invasion of Egypt and we may see these Boko Haram , Houthies are taking part together with the Romans and the Turks (Turkey)

          21. the Hadith already fitted at the past.Not now or in future.

        3. America do its better..count its out.

        4. Masters and Creators of ‘Daesh’ ISIS: Iran, Assad, and Allies

          Consider the Iranian (Zanaadiqah, Mushrikoon, Sabaite-Majoosite-Safavid, Rafziz, Rafidi, Rawafid, Takfiri, Khawarij crypto Yahud Anjaas) game. It has no rules and one goal: Divert the attention away from one’s weakness. We invented it and we are masters at playing it. We have been diverting the attention towards Israel ever since the Palestinian exodus of 1948.

          Daesh (ISIS) is Iran’s secret military division. They get generous financial and arms support from Iran and are able to recruit foreign paid mercenaries. Iran is spending a lot of money in different ways to counter the Syrian revolution, on this clandestine ISIS operation as well as on supporting the Assad regime. ISIS helped both Assad’s regime from collapsing and Iran in keeping it’s hegemony over ME intact and showcasing to the world it’s importance in being the sole saviors and protectors against their own created Daesh and thereby using them as a bargaining tool to strengthen their position on the negotiation table.

          For a diversionary tactic, ISIS is a dream tool to deflect the attention away from Syria and Iran, from their nuclear programs, terrorist proxies, fear politics, and more importantly from regime change. Assad, with Iranian help, forged ISIS for a reason.

          It serves both Syria and Iran to maintain the ISIS threat against the West for many years to come. If the West is focused on their ISIS creation, who has the time to change the regimes of the masters of terror? Who has the time to monitor Iran’s nuclear ambitions?

          Just Google Syria News and weigh-in the number of stories on ISIS vs. those on the Syrian Qusayr, mountain-deep nuclear facility in Syria. This is how Iran is defeating Obama. The Mullahs threw him a bone after he failed to remove Assad to divert permanently his attention away from their terror. It sure is working.

          Moreover, it is working because Secretary Kerry is almost begging Russia to find a solution for Syria. The same country US have slapped sanctions against is the very same one Kerry is begging to help him close the Syria file soiling his legacy. It’s OK should you feel like crying for America here.

          Hindsight, Obama’s letter to Khamenei suggesting he will work with Iran on combating ISIS underscores how little US President, and his NSC staff, understand the Arab world. This grotesque ignorance is leading us to the chaos we see in many parts of the region.

          If we are sweating bullets fighting ISIS, you had better believe ISIS will go if Iran says so.

          Over the past 15 years, Assad tried, on several occasions, to kick-start a new terror group inside Syria to serve his needs (Remember Fatah al-Islam?), but ISIS, created with the help of Iran, is his crown jewel. He empowered ISIS to occupy oil fields he no longer controlled and purchased back his own oil to strengthen it.

          Anyone who thinks ISIS, now an important global brand of terror, is about to be defeated, think again. Neither regimes will let it happen. The same way Syria and Iran fed al-Qaeda in Iraq to terrorize US troops, both will feed ISIS to threaten the region and to keep us busy. This is why most of Assad’s attacks on the battlefields have been against innocent Syrian civilians, not against ISIS.

          Recently Assad has called for cooperation with the West to defeat ISIS. Just another ruse to wrap ISIS like a suicide vest wraps around one’s bare back. Luckily PM Cameron did not fall for it.

          On the diplomatic front, Assad is dispatching secret envoys who will find their way to the ears of US allies, and Iran is assisting Hezbollah to go on a charm offensive to showcase how Shia Islam is Reformed Islam because of the untouchable Sunni Ahadith.

          The Punch and the Kiss tactic of Iran. Punch the West with ISIS, then send Nasrallah kisses to Saudi Arabia (Ouch), and indirectly to Israel against the unreformed Sunnis.

          Iran knows it cannot confront its enemies by constantly antagonizing them. It has to play the roles of friend and foe simultaneously to achieve its goals of total dominance in the region.

          ISIS is a dangerous gravity pulling us into another Middle East terror trap, and so far it is working because Obama has the likes of a 37-year old Ben Rhodes, with no past foreign affairs experience, run US foreign policy.

          If we really want to eradicate ISIS, we have no choice but to remove their masters, in Damascus and Tehran, from power. Anyone who believes ISIS will be destroyed eventually if Assad and Khamenei are still in power is a fool.

      3. wargame1 Avatar

        Its good to see that the Daeshdogs are killed by the Americans. They asked for it. This Al-Qaeda Dogs took responsibility of 911 and London 7/7 bombing and praised the attack so they wanted to take on America by killing civilian and the punishment of Allah against any one who kill non combatant civilian. These Al-Qaeda khawarij are killing Muslims so you should fear Allah for supporting this Shaiatins. Daesh is beaten badly by the Kurds and now Jordan is going to beat the crap out of Daeshbags. The Muslims get the verdict from the known Sunni Scholar against Daesh. No Sunni scholar support the Daeshbags. If you support them thats your choice but the majority sunnis do not support these Khawarij Dogs.

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar

          (again the ‘fear’ factors … ‘scared’ is the order of the day)

          1. they are too brave that why killed each others and destroyed their countries.Bravery with out mind.

          2. 5thDrawer Avatar

            That’s not ‘brave’ … it’s simply stupid.
            ‘Brave’ was a guy who walked into a lion’s den … (like a few aid workers we could name)
            Of course, they cut off his head anyway.

          3. Reasonableman Avatar
            Reasonableman

            I blame women

          4. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Reasonably, it could be said that one served his head on a plate, in a good story.
            AND yet … That female form …. mmmm … so naughty.
            A few have taken mine, over the years … when they knew what to say. 😉

        2. I m not support any side.It is their business to feuding on others.We are debating our differences.we are not too greedy on politic.we share economy equally with non muslims.even share power with them.Hence it is peace in here.If there are critical problem we negotiate behind curtain..all problem saved well.It is our culture from the beginning.Not easy to make all side satisfied on all things.But we try its best.

        3. 9 11 perpetrated by Zioniast in America..mossad and cia.you are backward on this.

      4. wargame1 Avatar

        Its Iran and Russia and Daesh Khawarij who are killing the Sunnis. Pointing finger to America wont help. Al-Qaeda attacked American civilian and they deserved to be punished for that. The good news is that these Khawarij are now marginalized and gathered in one place i.e. Iraq and Syria. More of these Dogs from else where will go there. These Khawarij are the enemy of mankind so every country should join to kill these bastards.

        1. sweetvirgo Avatar
          sweetvirgo

          Wargame…you’re just wasting your time with Zabada. It’s already programmed in his head that the west is to blame for EVERYTHING that is happening in the middle east and the only reason why Sunni’s are fighting back is because they have been oppressed. This is all he knows.

          1. too many sectarian in politic,theology,religion,doctrines..no modernization..civilization..Arab,s border made in the west,by Christians,their enemy.to divide them.Believe strongly on the west..but it,s civilization..science and tech.These all lead to Arabs down fall.Syiah Iran also is weak next to the the west who support israel badly..no country be able to win over Zionism..they need new kind of unity..but there are no a single tool be able to unite them.Tribalism disperse Arabs badly.Their fate now is fully on god,s hand.He will intervene in near future.

        2. Evil Axis – Iran, Zionists, and their Allies

          Is it safe to say that Iran, Zionists, and their Allies are source of all world’s Evils?

          Iran + Ass ad + Hezbulshaitan + Zionists + Allies are creators of ISIS, etc.

          Shiite Mahdi, Jewish Moshiach, Ra, etc. = Dajjal, Antichrist, Lucifer, etc.

          Iran is the problem not the solution. It along with it’s allies created this Khawarij daesh. They are desperate to bring their Mahdi or Moshiach (Dajjal) by creating such evil groups and events.

          Many talking heads around the world say that Iran is the key to defeating ISIS. But those in the know say the two “enemies” are actually secret allies.

          “There is no doubt after seeing the past and current events and the beneficiary who has benefitted that elements within Iran’s security services have facilitated ISIS,” Col. Derek Harvey told Foreign Policy, referring to the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, a terrorist network-cum-jihadist army that has now taken over territory in Syria and Iraq that, when combined, is roughly the size of Jordan. “When given opportunities to interdict, or have an effect, [the Iranians] have refrained.”

          Another high-ranking retired U.S. military official, who asked not to be identified by name, told FP: “Ansar al-Islam, the people who eventually became al Qaeda in Iraq [the forerunner organization to ISIS] — where’d they come from? They came from Iran. They traveled from Iran through Iraqi Kurdistan and then through Mosul before moving south through Al Sharqat and then Tikrit.” The official added: “Iran ran a very subversive campaign against Saddam long before we got into that country. And we were dealing with those same lines of communications before we got there. Look what they’ve done to the Levant, to Lebanon a couple times over.

          Intelligence reporting during this period, suggested that Iran was indeed funding “al Qaeda-type elements” in Iraq as well as Shiite militias such as Asaib Ahl al-Haq and Kataib Hezbollah, both of which are now said to be playing a major role in fortifying central Baghdad and Shiite-predominant cities and towns in southern Iraq. Iranian documents captured by U.S. forces in Iraq in 2007 did indeed state that Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps-Quds Force (IRGC) was helping Sunni jihadists along with Shiite militias, although to nowhere near the same extent. “All of the EFPs [explosively formed penetrators], IEDs [improved explosive devices], rockets, and rocket launchers we were seizing — all of this was coming out of Iran via the Shiite militias”. “Asaib Ahl al-Haq was getting $20 million a month or some outrageous figure like that to train their fighters. Their leadership was in Tehran, but their people operated in Iraq.” Another Iranian client was the Mahdi Army, led by Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who has now constituted that militia — once the bane of coalition forces in Najaf and beyond — under the new banner of the “Peace Brigades.” (Though that somewhat anodyne rebranding has not stopped Mahdi militants from marching through Baghdad with mock suicide vests.) According to Welch, the Mahdi Army “was going to Iran and getting training not in guerrilla warfare but in how to stir up sectarian conflict.”

          Iran’s influence in Iraq since ISIS sacked Mosul last June has resulted in a wave of sectarian bloodletting and dispossession against the country’s Sunni minority population, usually at the hands of Iranian-backed Shia militia groups, but sometimes with the active collusion of the Iraq’s internal security forces. Indeed, just as news was breaking last week that ISIS’s five-month siege on the Syrian-Turkish border town Kobane finally had been broken, Reuters reported that in Iraq’s Diyala province at least 72 “unarmed Iraqis” —all Sunnis—were “taken from their homes by men in uniform; heads down and linked together, then led in small groups to a field, made to kneel, and selected to be shot one by one.”

          For instance, 255 Sunni prisoners were executed by Shia militias and their confederates in the government’s internal security forces between June 9 and mid-July, according to Human Rights Watch. Eight of the victims were boys below the age of 18. “Sunnis are a minority in Baghdad, but they’re the majority in our morgue,” a doctor working at Iraq’s Health Ministry, told HRW at the end of July. Three forensic pathologists found that most of the victims in Baghdad were shot clean through the head, their bodies often left casually where they were killed. “The numbers have only increased since Mosul,” one doctor said.

          Iran, like President Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Damascus, is making the case that Saudi Arabia and other Sunni countries of the Persian Gulf are the real problem — the wellspring of terrorism in the region — and that Iran is therefore the natural ally of the United States.

          But this is only half-true. Iran has also nurtured Sunni jihadists when it was convenient to do so, and it has also spent years cultivating Shiite sectarianism. In its effort to dominate the region after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, Iran fostered staunch Shiite chauvinists, first Iraq and more recently in Syria. By doing this, Tehran gave up completely on an earlier ecumenical attempt to make Shiism acceptable to Sunnis under the banner of joint resistance against the “forces of global arrogance” — that is, the United States, Israel, and the Arab monarchies of the Gulf.

          Iran’s policy began in Iraq, where Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, Tehran’s protégé and anointed leader, led the country in a blindly sectarian and brutally authoritarian fashion, singling out Sunni rivals for persecution. Iran’s anti-Sunnism was further revealed when it backed the Assad regime in Damascus. Here Tehran mobilized significant financial, ideological, and military resources, including Shiite paramilitary forces such as Hezbollah, to fight for Assad’s survival while he wantonly continued to kill and brutalize Syria’s Sunni population. The net effect is that Iran has alienated the Sunnis of the Arab world, some of whom now express support for the most extreme forms of Shiite radicalism.

          1. 5thDrawer Avatar

            Music please …..
            ‘Oh the games people play, now.
            Never meaning what they say, now.
            Never saying what they mean ….
            And they don’t give a damn.’

            (look up all the verses …)

          2. wargame1 Avatar

            Brilliant writing Mashallah.

          3. I guess you protect your monarchy.

          4. 5thDrawer Avatar

            As monarchies go, this one isn’t so bad. The majority respect it.

          5. it is better next to dictatorship.Any way not the best.

          6. 5thDrawer Avatar

            But El Supremo lives on.

        3. khah..khah..I fear isis will cut of you ball.I saw they have anything to win.

        4. America attacked Sunni Iraqis only for democracy and oil..,killing nearly a million…and you ..big ball.. not say american is a dog.

    3. Limaaza taktuluunal muslimin..limaza lam taktul Assad askariah…au Israil…am antum abdun Americaaa wala abdul ilallah.

      1. Reasonableman Avatar
        Reasonableman

        Instead of joining a conversation with all guns blazing, try to calculate and put into perspective more than one view.

        Btw. You arabi عربي also needs working on.

        1. killing muslims Iraqis ,who killed badly by America and Syiah is legal to you and killing America zionist armies,who deserve to destroy Arab on behalf of Israel is illegal to you…you are great muslims of all times.God will regard you as second Saladin or second khalid Ibni walid.You will get Jannatul Firdaus.God love crazy muslims.

        2. yes..i m in working on..jaahil murakkab wa majnuuuun.

          1. Reasonableman Avatar
            Reasonableman

            Ok, you can take solace in your rant.

          2. it is not enough.

          3. 5thDrawer Avatar

            And according to one article, the girls often agree to marry an old guy for the money it brings to the rest of the family. Apparently a common ‘escape’. Jordan is NOT condoning it, but it’s a ‘custom’ as old as the hills. Women at age 14 out of war … in sad ways, older than their years … taking an ‘option’. Survival.
            The ‘proof’ of the survival of them and the family remains to be seen.
            Happily, some of those girls refuse to accept the ‘never-ending’ offers.

          4. war destroy anything.American greediness on oil and Zionist expanding were the real cause.Arabs have no unity ,no civilization at all to defend them selves.Their borders made in the west,who are cheating them badly at the past.These borders really to disperse them badly.Arabs know it not.It is easy to eat smaller cakes than the big one.now the west are having their breakfast on that cakes..Jews bankers join them.

Leave a Reply