Saudi Arabia mobilizes clergy, media against extremist recruitment

Share:

Suleiman Sabiyi, a Saudi national who went to Syria after the death of his brother there, eventually decided to return to Saudi Arabia. (Al Arabiya)
Suleiman Sabiyi, a Saudi national who went to Syria after the death of his brother there, eventually decided to return to Saudi Arabia. (Al Arabiya)
For Saudi Arabia, the war against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is a vital struggle for the future of the Middle East that must be fought – but not by its own young men.

Alarmed by how jihadi veterans back home from Afghanistan and Iraq joined an Al-Qaeda uprising a decade ago, Riyadh is now trying to halt recruitment of Saudis to the militant cause, even as it funds and arms rebels in Syria.

The government and clerics are pushing their message in both the media and the mosque: Saudis who join radical groups such as Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) will get sucked into a jihadist experience that is ugly and futile.

Local media have highlighted the case of Fahd al-Zaidi, a Saudi who said he was duped into joining a war against fellow Sunni Muslims instead of fighting for their freedom.

“Anyone who dared to question the ISIS would be put in isolation and prevented from contacting others,” he said in comments reported in the local Arab News and carried widely by other Saudi media. “We spent days and nights wondering how we allowed ourselves to be fooled by a bunch of conmen.”

With the largely Sunni rebel groups often fighting each other rather than Assad’s forces, Riyadh believes the Syrian war should be left to Syrians. Those Saudis who shift their allegiance from the ruling Al Saud family to ISIS’s caliphate, which it is fighting to establish across Syria and Iraq, represent a threat to the government of the U.S. ally.

Informed by its previous experience, the kingdom is using an array of tools against jihadi recruitment apart from the media.

A royal decree in February ordered long jail terms for people who went to fight overseas or helped others do so, or for those giving moral or material aid to groups including ISIS and al Qaeda’s official offshoot in Syria, the Nusra Front. Several people have already been convicted.

Top clerics including the Grand Mufti and members of the Senior Council of Scholars, the highest religious bodies in the kingdom, have repeatedly denounced militant groups in sermons and fatwas. While some senior government-appointed clerics have described the Syrian war as a jihad, they have made clear it is one that should be fought by Syrians, not by Saudis.

Nevertheless, thousands of young men appear to have slipped through the net and joined ISIS and other groups. The authorities say they are aware of 2,500 Saudis fighting overseas, but admit there may be more.

Unlike in previous conflicts before militants learnt to use social media networks as recruitment tools, would-be jihadis no longer need extensive contact with facilitators inside Saudi Arabia. Some have simply flown to Turkey and headed for the Syrian or Iraqi border. Others used online contacts to get a mobile phone number for somebody who would help them once they arrived.

Salman, whose brother followed the route via Turkey to fight alongside ISIS and Nusra Front in Syria, said his sibling had been recruited online. But the brother, who is now on a government deradicalisation program, found the promises of a pure jihad did not match a far messier reality.

“His situation was very bad. He saw a lot of blood… there was a very big change in him when he came back. He blamed himself very much,” Salman said in a phone interview arranged by a psychologist working with the program and conducted on condition of anonymity.

Based in a secure facility in Riyadh, the programme uses clerics to argue against militancy, and provides art and sports classes where psychologists monitor inmates’ behaviour.

It encourages family visits and has helped inmates – or “beneficiaries” as the authorities call them – to find jobs and even marriage partners to help reintegrate them into society. It has a recidivism rate of around one in 10, officials say.

Muslim solidarity

Saudis went to previous jihadist wars mostly out of a sense of international Muslim solidarity which the authorities had fostered for decades as a counterweight to secular anti-monarchist ideology, say analysts.

In the 1980s it was the government and ruling family which encouraged Saudis to join the fight against Soviet forces occupying Afghanistan. But many clergy, particularly at a local level, were involved in recruitment.

The kingdom’s strict Wahhabi school of Islam, with its message of intolerance of Shiites and non-Muslims, may also have made Saudis more open to militant thinking.

The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, which deposed the Sunni leadership of Saddam Hussein in 2003 and brought a Shiite-led government to power, deepened a belief among many young Sunnis, including Saudis, that their branch of Islam faced persecution.

“I saw on the television news that my brother Muslims needed help, so I thought I’d go and join them,” said Ayad al-Onazi, who spent four years fighting alongside Iraqi insurgents before his group fell apart after a battle with Al-Qaeda.

When he told his family he had arrived in Iraq in 2005, they begged him to return but, sure he was doing the right thing, he stayed until 2009.

Today, ISIS is countering pressure on its fighters to come home. In a recent video, it showed a young man identified as Abu Hajr al-Jazrawi who was about to become a suicide bomber. Jazrawi tried to tell his parents that they were wrong to want him back.

“O my mother and father, as long as you say to return, to leave this path and not be deceived by ISIS, and not to be deluded by the Caliphate, I will only repeat the words of he who said: ‘would that my people knew!’,” he said in the video, translated by SITE Monitoring.

Not all Saudi families have been upset to see loved ones risk death. Some publicly celebrated their sons’ “martyrdom” a decade ago, said Thomas Hegghammer, author of the book Jihad in Saudi Arabia and a research fellow at the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment. “Their friends would post phone numbers for people to call and congratulate,” he said.

Such displays no longer occur, but it is unclear whether this is because public attitudes have changed or Saudis are simply frightened of the security services. Nevertheless, the government campaign has clearly driven much of the recruitment effort further underground, making it harder to assess who is going to Syria and Iraq and why.

“There’s so much less visibility now into the jihadi community. They don’t write as much about themselves as they used to. Activists in Saudi Arabia are more restrained now online than they used to be,” said Hegghammer.

Family push back

In August people in the small desert town of Tumair, about 160 km north of Riyadh, tipped off the authorities that two mosque imams were recruiting extremists.

The clerics, identified in local media as Ali al-Salloum and Hamad al-Rais, were detained with six others in Tumair on suspicion of working to send people to ISIS, the Interior Ministry later said without confirming their names.

This showed both how local religious networks can still pose a threat, and how Saudi society is growing less tolerant of such efforts. But in a sign of how sensitive such subjects are, no Tumair residents contacted by Reuters would discuss the case.

Ali al-Afnan, the psychologist working with the deradicalisation program, said family ties were at the center of its strategy to stop people going to war or entice back those who had already done so.

What authorities now fear most, he said, is the ease with which militants can use YouTube and Twitter to encourage young men to go to Syria or Iraq. This is a problem they share with other Arab governments, as well as Western countries which are also trying to discourage their citizens from joining jihad.

Riyadh has helped mothers of fighters in Syria to share their pain on television. In February a woman who called herself “Umm Mohammed” or “mother of Mohammed” appeared on a popular television to castigate firebrand preachers for luring her 17-year-old son to Syria.

The show’s host, Dawood Al Shirian, told Reuters that the government had been very receptive to his efforts to speak to such people and the son, Misfer, had eventually returned home after seeing his mother’s appeal.

Misfer later appeared on the program himself and said on it that he had decided to join the jihad after listening to sermons online by an influential Syrian preacher, the Saudi-owned al-Arabiya news channel reported at the time.

He travelled to Turkey alone and paid a smuggler to help him cross the border, but he grew disillusioned because some of the rebels in his group drank alcohol, he said.

Al Arabiya

Share:

Comments

13 responses to “Saudi Arabia mobilizes clergy, media against extremist recruitment”

  1. Reasonableman Avatar
    Reasonableman

    IMO, if I was in a position of power over the 1billion coming from saudi. I would spend it towards the same deradicalisation program towards our sons in #Roumieh.

    Who am I though

  2. Fauzia45 Avatar

    All extreme religious clerics (wherever they are found( who preach ^jihad^ ,hate,and spread hate and fear should be stopped by the authorities ,point blank!!!!!!!!!

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      But … ‘we vote’ on who should be ‘the authority’ … don’t we? 😉

  3. The Saudi clergy , allies of USA and Israel (officially the worlds leading terrorist states and proud of it) are in no position to be making fatwas against the defenders of the oppressed.

    1. Reasonableman Avatar
      Reasonableman

      Sallam 3allaykom akhi,
      I don’t believe we are in a position to stop them. The trend going around and is really annoying is to defame the saudi clerics just because they are from saudi and are outspoken against ISIS but when it comes to ISIS we are suddenly supposed to shut our mouths because they hold guns (you and I both know they have done some outrages stuff) and are supposbly defenders of our faith? And then we are told not to speak because we have no knowledge. So let me ask you do those who defame the cleric have more knowledge then him.

      Take 2 steps back akhi its not our fight.

      1. WA Alaikumul Aslaam Akhi, I get your point , but the government approved clerics do not offer any solutions, from the quran, so we should be clear in who we should and should not support .
        The only real solution is to look out for and follow the followers of the quran and Sunna. That much is clear. Why are they not calling for unity based on these principles.
        May Allah guide and preserve our great Umma as well as humanity . And May falsehood perish quickly.

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar

          You are right … there needs to be ‘love’ promoted … somehow.
          And some DO …. And DO follow ‘the good words’ for humanities.
          And they become like voices crying in the wilderness … until people finally become sick of killing each other all the time … once again.
          If that’s the only education children receive, the cycles never stop.

    2. 5thDrawer Avatar

      Frankly, listening to Fatheads make Fatwah’s is what fouled up ‘the book’ in the first place.
      And I could say ‘books’. Yes.
      But giving a point to the Christians, one must allow that they didn’t have a line in the text that says ‘all written after is dominant over what was before’. That is blatant politicking.
      Instead, they wrote new books. Of thought, and of philosophy, which is what religion basically is. They may have adjusted somewhat to be sure, and filed the real fairy-tales off to another library, but they didn’t say everyone had to ignore the old library or face death for reading it. And if one is allowed to think, one should be able to pass on the old thoughts well enough to see what doesn’t apply for humans 3000 years later.
      In fact, try to ASSUME THAT WAS WHAT WAS MEANT – in a recognition that ‘time changes everything’. WHY would we – with any sensibility – choose what made our lives worse???

      Hell, I should bite my tongue, but I’d say that Shiites were an improvement over the more ancient Sunni … and we all seem to agree that everything is an improvement over the Talmud which those few still living with it debate over forever … BUT EACH has these pockets of ‘resistance’ … and it’s the natural resistance of ‘change’ by ‘short-lived’ humanity which feels uncomfortable with the unknown. The unknown they don’t feel ‘right’ in.
      (why anyone feels comfortable whacking themselves on the head with a sword, or nailing themselves to a cross, is beyond me – a little flagellation by a lovely woman could be more fun and leave no marks at all. 😉
      Some parts of all these religions has gotten stuck by ‘simple belief’ somewhere in the past. And by the ‘leaders’ who cannot, or will not, lead humanity into a better future, but try to Lord it over us instead, for their own short comfortable lives.

  4. Alan Henning and other westerners are Lauded and praised when they go to Syria to help, but god forbid if a Muslim tries to do the same

    1. 5thDrawer Avatar

      Did Henning arrive with a gun?

      1. From where we sit , Only Allah (swt) knows who comes with what , as well as the intentions . But western mainstream media journalists are not the freinds of Islam, and should not expect a welcoming party.

        1. 5thDrawer Avatar

          What you call ‘western mainstream media’ is under attack everywhere these days … even the ones who were born and live in that muddled east …. especially from ALL governments which don’t want the taxpayers to know where all the money is going. Using ‘secrecy laws’ and ‘eyes only’ documentation for just about ANY FACT (including how many babies have buck-teeth from sucking thumbs) has taken honest reporting to low levels.
          Journalists are under fire – especially if they try to learn and to show BOTH sides of an argument, when confronted by both the ‘sides’ of idiots doing the arguing – because they dared to seek.
          And really, both ‘sides’ need to be seen to know which to choose for oneself. Getting only half the information from a blighted scource creates the angst.
          If freedom of the press, and rational speech, is the goal, then nothing should be proscribed by any country’s ‘security apparatus’ beyond what is truly going to keep it’s own military people safe – in the present.
          And really, Military History is available to all.
          Where it is not allowed to be recorded … well … who later will ‘believe’. ??

  5. The hidden truth-
    It’s a proven fact that wherever and whenever shits are and get power they start chaos. They play their games by using actors portrayed as sunnis or shits pretending as sunnis. They are caniving, deceitful, manipulative, and pathological liars. You can never trust or belief what they say as they always use Taqiyah against non-shits.
    You can’t name a single country which is in peace where they are in power irrespective of they being majority or not. The countries in which they are not in power then they side with the enemies of Muslims to gain political power and once they attain that then their real evilness comes out as shown and proved in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen, etc.
    As its taken that they will do and stoop to any level to achieve their goals. They start their age old tactics of making themselves look like the good guys, better of all evils, saviors, defenders, resistors, and if that doesnt work then they instigate hate, sectarianism, power politics, stories such as defending some shrine, ridiculing, maligning, branding anyone or everyone who stands against or in their path as wahabi, salafi, and takfiri.
    They create Khawarij’s like Isis, etc. and show to the world as sunnis. They make them do un-islamic things and bask in glory using that as a tool to propagandize, instill fear, and hate towards Islam and Muslims. Then they repeat the same rhetoric’s in social media, etc. portraying themselves as the good guys and scaring and brainwashing Muslims and non-muslims which in turn serves their purpose only at the expense of Islam, Muslims, Humanity, and Peace.
    They have done and have been doing more damage than all other haters of Islam combined.
    They are not Muslims and if they were as they claim to be then their actions proves it else.
    They are more dangerous than the worst of the humans.
    ASS ad=Isis=Shits=Iran

Leave a Reply